AH-W 08 Feb 03:00 am OS-W

Lineup Out

Kennards Hire Community Oval
Hallyburton Johnstone Shield

Best Player Combinations For
AH-W vs OS-W

How it Works?

This guide is super useful for identifying player combinations that are likely to score big. Use the filters to identify the best player combinations according to specific match scenarios.

Player correlate positively

Both players generally perform similarly when picked together. They either score high together or score low together. Maximise FPts by picking players that correlate positively with top players.

Player correlate negatively

Both players generally perform in an opposite manner. If one player scores high, the other usually scores low. Avoid picking players that correlate negatively with top player

Show Player Combinations on the basis of:

Best AH-W Player Combinations

Best AH-W Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad
I Gaze WK AH-W
B Illing BOW AH-W
R Jaswal BOW AH-W
L Down BAT AH-W
S Shahri BAT AH-W
B Armstrong BAT AH-W
F Jonas BOW AH-W
A Hucker BOW AH-W
M Green BAT AH-W
J Penfold AR AH-W
P Catton BAT AH-W
I Gaze
B Illing
R Jaswal
L Down
S Shahri
B Armstrong
F Jonas
A Hucker
M Green
J Penfold
P Catton
1
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
I Gaze
Strong Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
B Illing
Positive Correlation
0.53
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
R Jaswal
Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
L Down
Weak Positive Correlation
0.41
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
S Shahri
Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
B Armstrong
No Correlation
0.6
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
F Jonas
Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
A Hucker
Weak Positive Correlation
0.62
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
M Green
Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
J Penfold
Weak Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
P Catton
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
B Illing
2 player
I Gaze
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
B Illing
2 player
B Illing
Strong Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
B Illing
2 player
R Jaswal
Weak Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
B Illing
2 player
L Down
No Correlation
0
1 player
B Illing
2 player
S Shahri
No Correlation
-0.2
1 player
B Illing
2 player
B Armstrong
No Correlation
0.19
1 player
B Illing
2 player
F Jonas
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
B Illing
2 player
A Hucker
No Correlation
0.16
1 player
B Illing
2 player
M Green
No Correlation
0.34
1 player
B Illing
2 player
J Penfold
Weak Positive Correlation
0.05
1 player
B Illing
2 player
P Catton
No Correlation
0.53
1 player
R Jaswal
2 player
I Gaze
Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
R Jaswal
2 player
B Illing
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
R Jaswal
2 player
R Jaswal
Strong Positive Correlation
1
1 player
R Jaswal
2 player
L Down
Strong Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
R Jaswal
2 player
S Shahri
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
R Jaswal
2 player
B Armstrong
No Correlation
0.18
1 player
R Jaswal
2 player
F Jonas
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
R Jaswal
2 player
A Hucker
Weak Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
R Jaswal
2 player
M Green
Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
R Jaswal
2 player
J Penfold
Weak Positive Correlation
0.55
1 player
R Jaswal
2 player
P Catton
Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
L Down
2 player
I Gaze
Weak Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
L Down
2 player
B Illing
No Correlation
1
1 player
L Down
2 player
R Jaswal
Strong Positive Correlation
1
1 player
L Down
2 player
L Down
Strong Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
L Down
2 player
S Shahri
No Correlation
0.22
1 player
L Down
2 player
B Armstrong
Weak Positive Correlation
0.01
1 player
L Down
2 player
F Jonas
No Correlation
-0.03
1 player
L Down
2 player
A Hucker
No Correlation
-0.12
1 player
L Down
2 player
M Green
No Correlation
0.55
1 player
L Down
2 player
J Penfold
Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
L Down
2 player
P Catton
Positive Correlation
0.41
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
I Gaze
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
B Illing
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
R Jaswal
Weak Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
L Down
No Correlation
1
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
S Shahri
Strong Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
B Armstrong
Weak Positive Correlation
0.55
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
F Jonas
Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
A Hucker
Positive Correlation
0.53
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
M Green
Positive Correlation
-0.28
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
J Penfold
Weak Negative Correlation
0.19
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
P Catton
No Correlation
0.17
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
I Gaze
No Correlation
-0.2
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
B Illing
No Correlation
0
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
R Jaswal
No Correlation
0.22
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
L Down
Weak Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
S Shahri
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
B Armstrong
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.12
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
F Jonas
No Correlation
0.32
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
A Hucker
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.26
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
M Green
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.1
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
J Penfold
No Correlation
0.19
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
P Catton
No Correlation
0.6
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
I Gaze
Positive Correlation
0.19
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
B Illing
No Correlation
0.18
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
R Jaswal
No Correlation
0.01
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
L Down
No Correlation
0.55
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
S Shahri
Positive Correlation
-0.12
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
B Armstrong
No Correlation
1
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
F Jonas
Strong Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
A Hucker
Positive Correlation
0.52
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
M Green
Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
J Penfold
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.07
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
P Catton
No Correlation
0.32
1 player
A Hucker
2 player
I Gaze
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
A Hucker
2 player
B Illing
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
A Hucker
2 player
R Jaswal
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.03
1 player
A Hucker
2 player
L Down
No Correlation
0.43
1 player
A Hucker
2 player
S Shahri
Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
A Hucker
2 player
B Armstrong
Weak Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
A Hucker
2 player
F Jonas
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
A Hucker
2 player
A Hucker
Strong Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
A Hucker
2 player
M Green
No Correlation
0.17
1 player
A Hucker
2 player
J Penfold
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
A Hucker
2 player
P Catton
Weak Positive Correlation
0.62
1 player
M Green
2 player
I Gaze
Positive Correlation
0.16
1 player
M Green
2 player
B Illing
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
M Green
2 player
R Jaswal
Positive Correlation
-0.12
1 player
M Green
2 player
L Down
No Correlation
0.53
1 player
M Green
2 player
S Shahri
Positive Correlation
-0.26
1 player
M Green
2 player
B Armstrong
Weak Negative Correlation
0.52
1 player
M Green
2 player
F Jonas
Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
M Green
2 player
A Hucker
No Correlation
1
1 player
M Green
2 player
M Green
Strong Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
M Green
2 player
J Penfold
No Correlation
-0.07
1 player
M Green
2 player
P Catton
No Correlation
0.31
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
I Gaze
Weak Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
B Illing
Weak Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
R Jaswal
Weak Positive Correlation
0.55
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
L Down
Positive Correlation
-0.28
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
S Shahri
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.1
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
B Armstrong
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
F Jonas
Weak Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
A Hucker
No Correlation
0.07
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
M Green
No Correlation
1
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
J Penfold
Strong Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
P Catton
Weak Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
P Catton
2 player
I Gaze
No Correlation
0.05
1 player
P Catton
2 player
B Illing
No Correlation
0.55
1 player
P Catton
2 player
R Jaswal
Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
P Catton
2 player
L Down
Positive Correlation
0.19
1 player
P Catton
2 player
S Shahri
No Correlation
0.19
1 player
P Catton
2 player
B Armstrong
No Correlation
-0.07
1 player
P Catton
2 player
F Jonas
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
P Catton
2 player
A Hucker
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.07
1 player
P Catton
2 player
M Green
No Correlation
0.32
1 player
P Catton
2 player
J Penfold
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
P Catton
2 player
P Catton
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick I Gaze and F Jonas together
Positive Correlation

Pick I Gaze and M Green together
Positive Correlation

Pick R Jaswal and L Down together
Strong Positive Correlation

High Performing Players

1 S Shahri

BAT
Similar Perfomance
F Jonas 0.55
M Green 0.53
A Hucker 0.43
I Gaze 0.41
B Armstrong 0.3
R Jaswal 0.2
P Catton 0.19
L Down 0.09
Opposite Perfomance
J Penfold -0.28

2 M Green

BAT
Similar Perfomance
I Gaze 0.62
S Shahri 0.53
F Jonas 0.52
R Jaswal 0.42
B Illing 0.16
A Hucker 0.09
J Penfold 0.07
Opposite Perfomance
B Armstrong -0.26
L Down -0.12
P Catton -0.07

3 F Jonas

BOW
Similar Perfomance
I Gaze 0.6
S Shahri 0.55
M Green 0.52
A Hucker 0.43
J Penfold 0.2
B Illing 0.19
R Jaswal 0.18
L Down 0.01
Opposite Perfomance
B Armstrong -0.12
P Catton -0.07

4 A Hucker

BOW
Similar Perfomance
S Shahri 0.43
F Jonas 0.43
I Gaze 0.32
B Armstrong 0.32
R Jaswal 0.28
P Catton 0.25
J Penfold 0.17
B Illing 0.14
M Green 0.09
Opposite Perfomance
L Down -0.03

5 B Illing

BOW
Similar Perfomance
I Gaze 0.4
R Jaswal 0.34
J Penfold 0.34
F Jonas 0.19
M Green 0.16
A Hucker 0.14
L Down 0.1
P Catton 0.05
Opposite Perfomance
B Armstrong -0.2

Best OS-W Player Combinations

Best OS-W Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad
A Browning AR OS-W
B James BAT OS-W
E Carson BOW OS-W
C Blakely BAT OS-W
H Jensen BOW OS-W
E Black BOW OS-W
O Gain BAT OS-W
M Loe BOW OS-W
P Inglis WK OS-W
S Bates AR OS-W
A Browning
B James
E Carson
C Blakely
H Jensen
E Black
O Gain
M Loe
P Inglis
S Bates
1
1 player
A Browning
2 player
A Browning
Strong Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
A Browning
2 player
B James
No Correlation
-0.1
1 player
A Browning
2 player
E Carson
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Browning
2 player
C Blakely
No Correlation
0.9
1 player
A Browning
2 player
H Jensen
Strong Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
A Browning
2 player
E Black
No Correlation
0.12
1 player
A Browning
2 player
O Gain
No Correlation
-0.85
1 player
A Browning
2 player
M Loe
Strong Negative Correlation
0.08
1 player
A Browning
2 player
P Inglis
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Browning
2 player
S Bates
No Correlation
0.12
1 player
B James
2 player
A Browning
No Correlation
1
1 player
B James
2 player
B James
Strong Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
B James
2 player
E Carson
No Correlation
0.34
1 player
B James
2 player
C Blakely
Weak Positive Correlation
0.01
1 player
B James
2 player
H Jensen
No Correlation
0.22
1 player
B James
2 player
E Black
Weak Positive Correlation
0.29
1 player
B James
2 player
O Gain
Weak Positive Correlation
0.41
1 player
B James
2 player
M Loe
Positive Correlation
0.04
1 player
B James
2 player
P Inglis
No Correlation
0.32
1 player
B James
2 player
S Bates
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.1
1 player
E Carson
2 player
A Browning
No Correlation
0.1
1 player
E Carson
2 player
B James
No Correlation
1
1 player
E Carson
2 player
E Carson
Strong Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
E Carson
2 player
C Blakely
Weak Positive Correlation
0.04
1 player
E Carson
2 player
H Jensen
No Correlation
0.46
1 player
E Carson
2 player
E Black
Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
E Carson
2 player
O Gain
No Correlation
0.3
1 player
E Carson
2 player
M Loe
Weak Positive Correlation
0.19
1 player
E Carson
2 player
P Inglis
No Correlation
0.12
1 player
E Carson
2 player
S Bates
No Correlation
0
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
A Browning
No Correlation
0.34
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
B James
Weak Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
E Carson
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
C Blakely
Strong Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
H Jensen
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
E Black
Weak Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
O Gain
Weak Positive Correlation
0.41
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
M Loe
Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
P Inglis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
S Bates
Weak Positive Correlation
0.9
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
A Browning
Strong Positive Correlation
0.01
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
B James
No Correlation
0.04
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
E Carson
No Correlation
0.13
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
C Blakely
No Correlation
1
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
H Jensen
Strong Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
E Black
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
O Gain
Weak Positive Correlation
0.16
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
M Loe
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
P Inglis
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
S Bates
Weak Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
E Black
2 player
A Browning
No Correlation
0.22
1 player
E Black
2 player
B James
Weak Positive Correlation
0.46
1 player
E Black
2 player
E Carson
Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
E Black
2 player
C Blakely
Weak Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
E Black
2 player
H Jensen
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
E Black
2 player
E Black
Strong Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
E Black
2 player
O Gain
Weak Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
E Black
2 player
M Loe
Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
E Black
2 player
P Inglis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
E Black
2 player
S Bates
Weak Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
O Gain
2 player
A Browning
No Correlation
0.29
1 player
O Gain
2 player
B James
Weak Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
O Gain
2 player
E Carson
No Correlation
0.36
1 player
O Gain
2 player
C Blakely
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
O Gain
2 player
H Jensen
Weak Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
O Gain
2 player
E Black
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
O Gain
2 player
O Gain
Strong Positive Correlation
0.48
1 player
O Gain
2 player
M Loe
Positive Correlation
0.49
1 player
O Gain
2 player
P Inglis
Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
O Gain
2 player
S Bates
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.85
1 player
M Loe
2 player
A Browning
Strong Negative Correlation
0.41
1 player
M Loe
2 player
B James
Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
M Loe
2 player
E Carson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.41
1 player
M Loe
2 player
C Blakely
Positive Correlation
0.16
1 player
M Loe
2 player
H Jensen
No Correlation
0.47
1 player
M Loe
2 player
E Black
Positive Correlation
0.48
1 player
M Loe
2 player
O Gain
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M Loe
2 player
M Loe
Strong Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
M Loe
2 player
P Inglis
No Correlation
0.32
1 player
M Loe
2 player
S Bates
Weak Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
A Browning
No Correlation
0.04
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
B James
No Correlation
0.19
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
E Carson
No Correlation
0.26
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
C Blakely
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
H Jensen
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
E Black
Weak Positive Correlation
0.49
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
O Gain
Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
M Loe
No Correlation
1
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
P Inglis
Strong Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
S Bates
No Correlation
0
1 player
S Bates
2 player
A Browning
No Correlation
0.32
1 player
S Bates
2 player
B James
Weak Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
S Bates
2 player
E Carson
No Correlation
0.3
1 player
S Bates
2 player
C Blakely
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
S Bates
2 player
H Jensen
Weak Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
S Bates
2 player
E Black
Weak Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
S Bates
2 player
O Gain
Weak Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
S Bates
2 player
M Loe
Weak Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
S Bates
2 player
P Inglis
No Correlation
1
1 player
S Bates
2 player
S Bates
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick A Browning and H Jensen together
Strong Positive Correlation

Don’t pick A Browning and M Loe in the same lineup
Strong Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 E Black

BOW
Similar Perfomance
M Loe 0.47
E Carson 0.46
C Blakely 0.28
P Inglis 0.28
O Gain 0.27
S Bates 0.27
H Jensen 0.24
B James 0.22
A Browning 0.18

2 E Carson

BOW
Similar Perfomance
E Black 0.46
C Blakely 0.36
M Loe 0.3
P Inglis 0.19
O Gain 0.15
S Bates 0.12
B James 0.1
H Jensen 0.04
Opposite Perfomance
A Browning -0.1

3 C Blakely

BAT
Similar Perfomance
M Loe 0.41
E Carson 0.36
O Gain 0.36
B James 0.34
S Bates 0.3
E Black 0.28
P Inglis 0.26
H Jensen 0.13

4 P Inglis

WK
Similar Perfomance
O Gain 0.49
E Black 0.28
C Blakely 0.26
E Carson 0.19
S Bates 0.18
H Jensen 0.14
M Loe 0.09
A Browning 0.08
B James 0.04

5 B James

BAT
Similar Perfomance
M Loe 0.41
C Blakely 0.34
S Bates 0.32
O Gain 0.29
E Black 0.22
A Browning 0.12
E Carson 0.1
P Inglis 0.04
H Jensen 0.01

Best AH-W Player Combinations

Best AH-W Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad
I Gaze WK AH-W
B Illing BOW AH-W
R Jaswal BOW AH-W
L Down BAT AH-W
S Shahri BAT AH-W
B Armstrong BAT AH-W
F Jonas BOW AH-W
A Hucker BOW AH-W
M Green BAT AH-W
J Penfold AR AH-W
P Catton BAT AH-W
I Gaze
B Illing
R Jaswal
L Down
S Shahri
B Armstrong
F Jonas
A Hucker
M Green
J Penfold
P Catton
1
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
I Gaze
Strong Positive Correlation
0.82
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
B Illing
Strong Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
R Jaswal
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
L Down
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
S Shahri
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
B Armstrong
Weak Negative Correlation
0.2
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
F Jonas
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.09
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
A Hucker
No Correlation
-0.09
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
M Green
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
J Penfold
No Correlation
-0.38
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
P Catton
Weak Negative Correlation
0.82
1 player
B Illing
2 player
I Gaze
Strong Positive Correlation
1
1 player
B Illing
2 player
B Illing
Strong Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
B Illing
2 player
R Jaswal
No Correlation
-0.23
1 player
B Illing
2 player
L Down
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
B Illing
2 player
S Shahri
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.6
1 player
B Illing
2 player
B Armstrong
Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
B Illing
2 player
F Jonas
Weak Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
B Illing
2 player
A Hucker
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
B Illing
2 player
M Green
No Correlation
0.27
1 player
B Illing
2 player
J Penfold
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.08
1 player
B Illing
2 player
P Catton
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
R Jaswal
2 player
I Gaze
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
R Jaswal
2 player
B Illing
No Correlation
1
1 player
R Jaswal
2 player
R Jaswal
Strong Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
R Jaswal
2 player
L Down
Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
R Jaswal
2 player
S Shahri
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.35
1 player
R Jaswal
2 player
B Armstrong
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.42
1 player
R Jaswal
2 player
F Jonas
Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
R Jaswal
2 player
A Hucker
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
R Jaswal
2 player
M Green
No Correlation
0
1 player
R Jaswal
2 player
J Penfold
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
R Jaswal
2 player
P Catton
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
L Down
2 player
I Gaze
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
L Down
2 player
B Illing
Weak Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
L Down
2 player
R Jaswal
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
L Down
2 player
L Down
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.43
1 player
L Down
2 player
S Shahri
Negative Correlation
-0.5
1 player
L Down
2 player
B Armstrong
Negative Correlation
-0.2
1 player
L Down
2 player
F Jonas
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
L Down
2 player
A Hucker
Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
L Down
2 player
M Green
No Correlation
0
1 player
L Down
2 player
J Penfold
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
L Down
2 player
P Catton
Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
I Gaze
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
B Illing
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.25
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
R Jaswal
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.43
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
L Down
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
S Shahri
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
B Armstrong
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
F Jonas
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
A Hucker
Weak Positive Correlation
0.64
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
M Green
Positive Correlation
-0.62
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
J Penfold
Negative Correlation
-0.11
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
P Catton
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
I Gaze
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.6
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
B Illing
Negative Correlation
-0.35
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
R Jaswal
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.5
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
L Down
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
S Shahri
No Correlation
1
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
B Armstrong
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
F Jonas
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.25
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
A Hucker
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.75
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
M Green
Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
J Penfold
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
P Catton
Weak Negative Correlation
0.2
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
I Gaze
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
B Illing
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.42
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
R Jaswal
Negative Correlation
-0.2
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
L Down
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
S Shahri
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
B Armstrong
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
F Jonas
Strong Positive Correlation
0.56
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
A Hucker
Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
M Green
Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
J Penfold
No Correlation
-0.6
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
P Catton
Negative Correlation
-0.09
1 player
A Hucker
2 player
I Gaze
No Correlation
0.27
1 player
A Hucker
2 player
B Illing
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
A Hucker
2 player
R Jaswal
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
A Hucker
2 player
L Down
Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
A Hucker
2 player
S Shahri
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
A Hucker
2 player
B Armstrong
Weak Negative Correlation
0.56
1 player
A Hucker
2 player
F Jonas
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
A Hucker
2 player
A Hucker
Strong Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
A Hucker
2 player
M Green
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.08
1 player
A Hucker
2 player
J Penfold
No Correlation
-0.38
1 player
A Hucker
2 player
P Catton
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.09
1 player
M Green
2 player
I Gaze
No Correlation
0
1 player
M Green
2 player
B Illing
No Correlation
0
1 player
M Green
2 player
R Jaswal
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
M Green
2 player
L Down
No Correlation
0.64
1 player
M Green
2 player
S Shahri
Positive Correlation
-0.75
1 player
M Green
2 player
B Armstrong
Negative Correlation
0.5
1 player
M Green
2 player
F Jonas
Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
M Green
2 player
A Hucker
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M Green
2 player
M Green
Strong Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
M Green
2 player
J Penfold
No Correlation
-0.09
1 player
M Green
2 player
P Catton
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
I Gaze
No Correlation
0.27
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
B Illing
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
R Jaswal
No Correlation
0
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
L Down
No Correlation
-0.62
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
S Shahri
Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
B Armstrong
Weak Negative Correlation
0.09
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
F Jonas
No Correlation
-0.08
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
A Hucker
No Correlation
0.09
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
M Green
No Correlation
1
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
J Penfold
Strong Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
P Catton
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.38
1 player
P Catton
2 player
I Gaze
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.08
1 player
P Catton
2 player
B Illing
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
P Catton
2 player
R Jaswal
Weak Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
P Catton
2 player
L Down
Positive Correlation
-0.11
1 player
P Catton
2 player
S Shahri
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
P Catton
2 player
B Armstrong
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.6
1 player
P Catton
2 player
F Jonas
Negative Correlation
-0.38
1 player
P Catton
2 player
A Hucker
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.09
1 player
P Catton
2 player
M Green
No Correlation
0.38
1 player
P Catton
2 player
J Penfold
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
P Catton
2 player
P Catton
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick I Gaze and B Illing together
Strong Positive Correlation

Pick L Down and P Catton together
Positive Correlation

Pick S Shahri and M Green together
Positive Correlation

Pick B Illing and B Armstrong together
Negative Correlation

Pick L Down and A Hucker together
Negative Correlation

Pick S Shahri and J Penfold together
Negative Correlation

Pick B Armstrong and M Green together
Negative Correlation

Pick F Jonas and P Catton together
Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 S Shahri

BAT
Similar Perfomance
M Green 0.64
F Jonas 0.33
A Hucker 0.33
Opposite Perfomance
J Penfold -0.62
L Down -0.43
I Gaze -0.33
B Illing -0.33
R Jaswal -0.25
P Catton -0.11

2 A Hucker

BOW
Similar Perfomance
F Jonas 0.56
S Shahri 0.33
B Illing 0.27
M Green 0.2
Opposite Perfomance
L Down -0.7
P Catton -0.38
R Jaswal -0.33
B Armstrong -0.25
I Gaze -0.09
J Penfold -0.08

3 F Jonas

BOW
Similar Perfomance
A Hucker 0.56
M Green 0.5
B Illing 0.33
S Shahri 0.33
I Gaze 0.2
J Penfold 0.09
Opposite Perfomance
P Catton -0.6
R Jaswal -0.42
B Armstrong -0.33
L Down -0.2

4 I Gaze

WK
Similar Perfomance
B Illing 0.82
R Jaswal 0.33
F Jonas 0.2
J Penfold 0.08
Opposite Perfomance
P Catton -0.38
S Shahri -0.33
B Armstrong -0.33
L Down -0.23
A Hucker -0.09
M Green -0.09

5 M Green

BAT
Similar Perfomance
S Shahri 0.64
F Jonas 0.5
A Hucker 0.2
J Penfold 0.09
Opposite Perfomance
B Armstrong -0.75
L Down -0.14
I Gaze -0.09
P Catton -0.09

Best OS-W Player Combinations

Best OS-W Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad
A Browning AR OS-W
B James BAT OS-W
E Carson BOW OS-W
C Blakely BAT OS-W
H Jensen BOW OS-W
E Black BOW OS-W
O Gain BAT OS-W
M Loe BOW OS-W
P Inglis WK OS-W
S Bates AR OS-W
A Browning
B James
E Carson
C Blakely
H Jensen
E Black
O Gain
M Loe
P Inglis
S Bates
1
1 player
A Browning
2 player
A Browning
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
A Browning
2 player
B James
No Correlation
-0.23
1 player
A Browning
2 player
E Carson
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
A Browning
2 player
C Blakely
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
A Browning
2 player
H Jensen
Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
A Browning
2 player
E Black
Positive Correlation
-0.42
1 player
A Browning
2 player
O Gain
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
A Browning
2 player
M Loe
Negative Correlation
0.42
1 player
A Browning
2 player
P Inglis
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
A Browning
2 player
S Bates
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
B James
2 player
A Browning
No Correlation
1
1 player
B James
2 player
B James
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.4
1 player
B James
2 player
E Carson
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.07
1 player
B James
2 player
C Blakely
No Correlation
-0.2
1 player
B James
2 player
H Jensen
No Correlation
0.03
1 player
B James
2 player
E Black
No Correlation
-0.18
1 player
B James
2 player
O Gain
No Correlation
0.05
1 player
B James
2 player
M Loe
No Correlation
-0.19
1 player
B James
2 player
P Inglis
No Correlation
0.38
1 player
B James
2 player
S Bates
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
E Carson
2 player
A Browning
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.4
1 player
E Carson
2 player
B James
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
E Carson
2 player
E Carson
Strong Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
E Carson
2 player
C Blakely
No Correlation
-0.2
1 player
E Carson
2 player
H Jensen
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
E Carson
2 player
E Black
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
E Carson
2 player
O Gain
Weak Negative Correlation
0.08
1 player
E Carson
2 player
M Loe
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
E Carson
2 player
P Inglis
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
E Carson
2 player
S Bates
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
A Browning
No Correlation
-0.07
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
B James
No Correlation
0.1
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
E Carson
No Correlation
1
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
C Blakely
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
H Jensen
No Correlation
0.1
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
E Black
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
O Gain
No Correlation
0.16
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
M Loe
No Correlation
-0.04
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
P Inglis
No Correlation
-0.08
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
S Bates
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
A Browning
Positive Correlation
-0.2
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
B James
No Correlation
-0.2
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
E Carson
No Correlation
0
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
C Blakely
No Correlation
1
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
H Jensen
Strong Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
E Black
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
O Gain
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
M Loe
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
P Inglis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
S Bates
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
E Black
2 player
A Browning
Positive Correlation
0.03
1 player
E Black
2 player
B James
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
E Black
2 player
E Carson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
E Black
2 player
C Blakely
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
E Black
2 player
H Jensen
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
E Black
2 player
E Black
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.18
1 player
E Black
2 player
O Gain
No Correlation
0.37
1 player
E Black
2 player
M Loe
Weak Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
E Black
2 player
P Inglis
Positive Correlation
0.54
1 player
E Black
2 player
S Bates
Positive Correlation
-0.42
1 player
O Gain
2 player
A Browning
Negative Correlation
-0.18
1 player
O Gain
2 player
B James
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
O Gain
2 player
E Carson
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
O Gain
2 player
C Blakely
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
O Gain
2 player
H Jensen
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.18
1 player
O Gain
2 player
E Black
No Correlation
1
1 player
O Gain
2 player
O Gain
Strong Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
O Gain
2 player
M Loe
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.09
1 player
O Gain
2 player
P Inglis
No Correlation
-0.25
1 player
O Gain
2 player
S Bates
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
M Loe
2 player
A Browning
Negative Correlation
0.05
1 player
M Loe
2 player
B James
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
M Loe
2 player
E Carson
No Correlation
0.16
1 player
M Loe
2 player
C Blakely
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
M Loe
2 player
H Jensen
Weak Positive Correlation
0.37
1 player
M Loe
2 player
E Black
Weak Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
M Loe
2 player
O Gain
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M Loe
2 player
M Loe
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
M Loe
2 player
P Inglis
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
M Loe
2 player
S Bates
Weak Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
A Browning
Positive Correlation
-0.19
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
B James
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
E Carson
No Correlation
-0.04
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
C Blakely
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
H Jensen
Weak Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
E Black
Positive Correlation
-0.09
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
O Gain
No Correlation
0
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
M Loe
No Correlation
1
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
P Inglis
Strong Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
S Bates
No Correlation
0
1 player
S Bates
2 player
A Browning
No Correlation
0.38
1 player
S Bates
2 player
B James
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
S Bates
2 player
E Carson
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.08
1 player
S Bates
2 player
C Blakely
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
S Bates
2 player
H Jensen
No Correlation
0.54
1 player
S Bates
2 player
E Black
Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
S Bates
2 player
O Gain
Weak Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
S Bates
2 player
M Loe
Weak Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
S Bates
2 player
P Inglis
No Correlation
1
1 player
S Bates
2 player
S Bates
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

No data found

High Performing Players

1 C Blakely

BAT
Similar Perfomance
M Loe 0.16
E Carson 0.1
E Black 0.1
Opposite Perfomance
A Browning -0.14
O Gain -0.14
S Bates -0.08
B James -0.07
P Inglis -0.04

2 E Black

BOW
Similar Perfomance
S Bates 0.54
P Inglis 0.43
A Browning 0.42
M Loe 0.37
E Carson 0.33
H Jensen 0.2
C Blakely 0.1
B James 0.03
Opposite Perfomance
O Gain -0.18

3 E Carson

BOW
Similar Perfomance
E Black 0.33
S Bates 0.23
P Inglis 0.14
C Blakely 0.1
M Loe 0.08
Opposite Perfomance
B James -0.4
O Gain -0.33
A Browning -0.23
H Jensen -0.2

4 P Inglis

WK
Similar Perfomance
E Black 0.43
A Browning 0.42
H Jensen 0.2
E Carson 0.14
S Bates 0.08
Opposite Perfomance
B James -0.19
O Gain -0.09
C Blakely -0.04

5 B James

BAT
Similar Perfomance
S Bates 0.38
M Loe 0.05
E Black 0.03
Opposite Perfomance
E Carson -0.4
H Jensen -0.2
P Inglis -0.19
O Gain -0.18
A Browning -0.14
C Blakely -0.07

PerfectLineup © 2025. All Rights Reserved