CC 22 Jun 12:00 am GG

Lineup Out

La Sagesse Park
Spice Isle T10

Best Player Combinations For
CC vs GG

How it Works?

This guide is super useful for identifying player combinations that are likely to score big. Use the filters to identify the best player combinations according to specific match scenarios.

Player correlate positively

Both players generally perform similarly when picked together. They either score high together or score low together. Maximise FPts by picking players that correlate positively with top players.

Player correlate negatively

Both players generally perform in an opposite manner. If one player scores high, the other usually scores low. Avoid picking players that correlate negatively with top player

Show Player Combinations on the basis of:

Best CC Player Combinations

Best CC Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad
K Andrew BAT CC
C Blache BOW CC
C Charles BOW CC
K Murray BOW CC
P McSween AR CC
D Hypolite AR CC
A Dubissette BOW CC
J Hazzard WK CC
H Jackson AR CC
D Nedd BAT CC
D Smith WK CC
K Andrew
C Blache
C Charles
K Murray
P McSween
D Hypolite
A Dubissette
J Hazzard
H Jackson
D Nedd
D Smith
1
1 player
K Andrew
2 player
K Andrew
Strong Positive Correlation
0.51
1 player
K Andrew
2 player
C Blache
Positive Correlation
0.6
1 player
K Andrew
2 player
C Charles
Positive Correlation
0.44
1 player
K Andrew
2 player
K Murray
Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
K Andrew
2 player
P McSween
Weak Positive Correlation
0.57
1 player
K Andrew
2 player
D Hypolite
Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
K Andrew
2 player
A Dubissette
Weak Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
K Andrew
2 player
J Hazzard
Positive Correlation
0.05
1 player
K Andrew
2 player
H Jackson
No Correlation
0.22
1 player
K Andrew
2 player
D Nedd
Weak Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
K Andrew
2 player
D Smith
Weak Positive Correlation
0.51
1 player
C Blache
2 player
K Andrew
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
C Blache
2 player
C Blache
Strong Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
C Blache
2 player
C Charles
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
C Blache
2 player
K Murray
Weak Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
C Blache
2 player
P McSween
No Correlation
0.57
1 player
C Blache
2 player
D Hypolite
Positive Correlation
0.49
1 player
C Blache
2 player
A Dubissette
Positive Correlation
0.44
1 player
C Blache
2 player
J Hazzard
Positive Correlation
-0.07
1 player
C Blache
2 player
H Jackson
No Correlation
0.22
1 player
C Blache
2 player
D Nedd
Weak Positive Correlation
0.41
1 player
C Blache
2 player
D Smith
Positive Correlation
0.6
1 player
C Charles
2 player
K Andrew
Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
C Charles
2 player
C Blache
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
C Charles
2 player
C Charles
Strong Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
C Charles
2 player
K Murray
Weak Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
C Charles
2 player
P McSween
Positive Correlation
0.46
1 player
C Charles
2 player
D Hypolite
Positive Correlation
0.49
1 player
C Charles
2 player
A Dubissette
Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
C Charles
2 player
J Hazzard
Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
C Charles
2 player
H Jackson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.71
1 player
C Charles
2 player
D Nedd
Positive Correlation
0.41
1 player
C Charles
2 player
D Smith
Positive Correlation
0.44
1 player
K Murray
2 player
K Andrew
Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
K Murray
2 player
C Blache
Weak Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
K Murray
2 player
C Charles
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
K Murray
2 player
K Murray
Strong Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
K Murray
2 player
P McSween
Positive Correlation
0.55
1 player
K Murray
2 player
D Hypolite
Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
K Murray
2 player
A Dubissette
Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
K Murray
2 player
J Hazzard
Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
K Murray
2 player
H Jackson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
K Murray
2 player
D Nedd
Weak Positive Correlation
0.45
1 player
K Murray
2 player
D Smith
Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
P McSween
2 player
K Andrew
Weak Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
P McSween
2 player
C Blache
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
P McSween
2 player
C Charles
Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
P McSween
2 player
K Murray
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
P McSween
2 player
P McSween
Strong Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
P McSween
2 player
D Hypolite
Weak Positive Correlation
0.51
1 player
P McSween
2 player
A Dubissette
Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
P McSween
2 player
J Hazzard
Weak Positive Correlation
0.44
1 player
P McSween
2 player
H Jackson
Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
P McSween
2 player
D Nedd
Weak Positive Correlation
0.51
1 player
P McSween
2 player
D Smith
Positive Correlation
0.57
1 player
D Hypolite
2 player
K Andrew
Positive Correlation
0.57
1 player
D Hypolite
2 player
C Blache
Positive Correlation
0.46
1 player
D Hypolite
2 player
C Charles
Positive Correlation
0.55
1 player
D Hypolite
2 player
K Murray
Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
D Hypolite
2 player
P McSween
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
D Hypolite
2 player
D Hypolite
Strong Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
D Hypolite
2 player
A Dubissette
Weak Positive Correlation
0.72
1 player
D Hypolite
2 player
J Hazzard
Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
D Hypolite
2 player
H Jackson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
D Hypolite
2 player
D Nedd
Weak Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
D Hypolite
2 player
D Smith
Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
A Dubissette
2 player
K Andrew
Weak Positive Correlation
0.49
1 player
A Dubissette
2 player
C Blache
Positive Correlation
0.49
1 player
A Dubissette
2 player
C Charles
Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
A Dubissette
2 player
K Murray
Positive Correlation
0.51
1 player
A Dubissette
2 player
P McSween
Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
A Dubissette
2 player
D Hypolite
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
A Dubissette
2 player
A Dubissette
Strong Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
A Dubissette
2 player
J Hazzard
Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
A Dubissette
2 player
H Jackson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
A Dubissette
2 player
D Nedd
Weak Positive Correlation
0.37
1 player
A Dubissette
2 player
D Smith
Weak Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
J Hazzard
2 player
K Andrew
Positive Correlation
0.44
1 player
J Hazzard
2 player
C Blache
Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
J Hazzard
2 player
C Charles
Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
J Hazzard
2 player
K Murray
Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
J Hazzard
2 player
P McSween
Weak Positive Correlation
0.72
1 player
J Hazzard
2 player
D Hypolite
Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
J Hazzard
2 player
A Dubissette
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
J Hazzard
2 player
J Hazzard
Strong Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
J Hazzard
2 player
H Jackson
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
J Hazzard
2 player
D Nedd
Weak Positive Correlation
0.54
1 player
J Hazzard
2 player
D Smith
Positive Correlation
0.05
1 player
H Jackson
2 player
K Andrew
No Correlation
-0.07
1 player
H Jackson
2 player
C Blache
No Correlation
0.32
1 player
H Jackson
2 player
C Charles
Weak Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
H Jackson
2 player
K Murray
Weak Positive Correlation
0.44
1 player
H Jackson
2 player
P McSween
Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
H Jackson
2 player
D Hypolite
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
H Jackson
2 player
A Dubissette
Weak Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
H Jackson
2 player
J Hazzard
No Correlation
1
1 player
H Jackson
2 player
H Jackson
Strong Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
H Jackson
2 player
D Nedd
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
H Jackson
2 player
D Smith
Weak Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
D Nedd
2 player
K Andrew
Weak Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
D Nedd
2 player
C Blache
Weak Positive Correlation
0.71
1 player
D Nedd
2 player
C Charles
Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
D Nedd
2 player
K Murray
Weak Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
D Nedd
2 player
P McSween
Weak Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
D Nedd
2 player
D Hypolite
Weak Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
D Nedd
2 player
A Dubissette
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
D Nedd
2 player
J Hazzard
Weak Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
D Nedd
2 player
H Jackson
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
D Nedd
2 player
D Nedd
Strong Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
D Nedd
2 player
D Smith
Weak Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
D Smith
2 player
K Andrew
Weak Positive Correlation
0.41
1 player
D Smith
2 player
C Blache
Positive Correlation
0.41
1 player
D Smith
2 player
C Charles
Positive Correlation
0.45
1 player
D Smith
2 player
K Murray
Positive Correlation
0.51
1 player
D Smith
2 player
P McSween
Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
D Smith
2 player
D Hypolite
Positive Correlation
0.37
1 player
D Smith
2 player
A Dubissette
Weak Positive Correlation
0.54
1 player
D Smith
2 player
J Hazzard
Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
D Smith
2 player
H Jackson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
D Smith
2 player
D Nedd
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
D Smith
2 player
D Smith
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick K Andrew and C Charles together
Positive Correlation

Pick C Charles and D Nedd together
Positive Correlation

Pick D Hypolite and J Hazzard together
Positive Correlation

High Performing Players

1 D Nedd

BAT
Similar Perfomance
C Charles 0.71
D Hypolite 0.38
H Jackson 0.38
A Dubissette 0.31
P McSween 0.26
J Hazzard 0.25
D Smith 0.25
K Murray 0.23
K Andrew 0.22
C Blache 0.22

2 H Jackson

AR
Similar Perfomance
P McSween 0.44
K Murray 0.39
D Nedd 0.38
C Charles 0.32
A Dubissette 0.25
D Hypolite 0.22
D Smith 0.2
J Hazzard 0.17
K Andrew 0.05
Opposite Perfomance
C Blache -0.07

3 P McSween

AR
Similar Perfomance
A Dubissette 0.51
D Smith 0.51
C Charles 0.5
K Murray 0.5
H Jackson 0.44
J Hazzard 0.38
D Hypolite 0.31
K Andrew 0.26
D Nedd 0.26
C Blache 0.12

4 J Hazzard

WK
Similar Perfomance
D Hypolite 0.72
D Smith 0.54
K Andrew 0.47
C Charles 0.47
C Blache 0.44
K Murray 0.42
A Dubissette 0.4
P McSween 0.38
D Nedd 0.25
H Jackson 0.17

5 A Dubissette

BOW
Similar Perfomance
P McSween 0.51
C Blache 0.49
C Charles 0.49
K Murray 0.4
J Hazzard 0.4
D Smith 0.37
D Nedd 0.31
K Andrew 0.3
D Hypolite 0.27
H Jackson 0.25

Best GG Player Combinations

Best GG Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

No data found

No data found

No data found

Best CC Player Combinations

Best CC Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad
K Andrew BAT CC
C Blache BOW CC
C Charles BOW CC
K Murray BOW CC
P McSween AR CC
D Hypolite AR CC
A Dubissette BOW CC
J Hazzard WK CC
H Jackson AR CC
D Nedd BAT CC
D Smith WK CC
K Andrew
C Blache
C Charles
K Murray
P McSween
D Hypolite
A Dubissette
J Hazzard
H Jackson
D Nedd
D Smith
1
1 player
K Andrew
2 player
K Andrew
Strong Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
K Andrew
2 player
C Blache
No Correlation
-0.25
1 player
K Andrew
2 player
C Charles
Weak Negative Correlation
0.09
1 player
K Andrew
2 player
K Murray
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
K Andrew
2 player
P McSween
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.45
1 player
K Andrew
2 player
D Hypolite
Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
K Andrew
2 player
A Dubissette
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.26
1 player
K Andrew
2 player
J Hazzard
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.26
1 player
K Andrew
2 player
H Jackson
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.58
1 player
K Andrew
2 player
D Nedd
Negative Correlation
-0.09
1 player
K Andrew
2 player
D Smith
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
C Blache
2 player
K Andrew
No Correlation
1
1 player
C Blache
2 player
C Blache
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
C Blache
2 player
C Charles
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
C Blache
2 player
K Murray
Positive Correlation
-0.78
1 player
C Blache
2 player
P McSween
Negative Correlation
0.5
1 player
C Blache
2 player
D Hypolite
Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
C Blache
2 player
A Dubissette
Weak Negative Correlation
0.56
1 player
C Blache
2 player
J Hazzard
Positive Correlation
-0.56
1 player
C Blache
2 player
H Jackson
Negative Correlation
0.11
1 player
C Blache
2 player
D Nedd
No Correlation
0
1 player
C Blache
2 player
D Smith
No Correlation
-0.25
1 player
C Charles
2 player
K Andrew
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
C Charles
2 player
C Blache
No Correlation
1
1 player
C Charles
2 player
C Charles
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
C Charles
2 player
K Murray
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.25
1 player
C Charles
2 player
P McSween
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
C Charles
2 player
D Hypolite
No Correlation
0.43
1 player
C Charles
2 player
A Dubissette
Positive Correlation
-0.5
1 player
C Charles
2 player
J Hazzard
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
C Charles
2 player
H Jackson
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
C Charles
2 player
D Nedd
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
C Charles
2 player
D Smith
Weak Negative Correlation
0.09
1 player
K Murray
2 player
K Andrew
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
K Murray
2 player
C Blache
Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
K Murray
2 player
C Charles
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
K Murray
2 player
K Murray
Strong Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
K Murray
2 player
P McSween
No Correlation
0.45
1 player
K Murray
2 player
D Hypolite
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
K Murray
2 player
A Dubissette
No Correlation
0.45
1 player
K Murray
2 player
J Hazzard
Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
K Murray
2 player
H Jackson
No Correlation
-0.27
1 player
K Murray
2 player
D Nedd
Weak Negative Correlation
0.09
1 player
K Murray
2 player
D Smith
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
P McSween
2 player
K Andrew
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.78
1 player
P McSween
2 player
C Blache
Negative Correlation
-0.25
1 player
P McSween
2 player
C Charles
Weak Negative Correlation
0.09
1 player
P McSween
2 player
K Murray
No Correlation
1
1 player
P McSween
2 player
P McSween
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.45
1 player
P McSween
2 player
D Hypolite
Negative Correlation
0.22
1 player
P McSween
2 player
A Dubissette
Weak Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
P McSween
2 player
J Hazzard
No Correlation
0.6
1 player
P McSween
2 player
H Jackson
Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
P McSween
2 player
D Nedd
Weak Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
P McSween
2 player
D Smith
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.45
1 player
D Hypolite
2 player
K Andrew
Negative Correlation
0.5
1 player
D Hypolite
2 player
C Blache
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
D Hypolite
2 player
C Charles
No Correlation
0.45
1 player
D Hypolite
2 player
K Murray
Positive Correlation
-0.45
1 player
D Hypolite
2 player
P McSween
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
D Hypolite
2 player
D Hypolite
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.2
1 player
D Hypolite
2 player
A Dubissette
No Correlation
0.67
1 player
D Hypolite
2 player
J Hazzard
Positive Correlation
-0.09
1 player
D Hypolite
2 player
H Jackson
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
D Hypolite
2 player
D Nedd
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.09
1 player
D Hypolite
2 player
D Smith
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
A Dubissette
2 player
K Andrew
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.25
1 player
A Dubissette
2 player
C Blache
Weak Negative Correlation
0.43
1 player
A Dubissette
2 player
C Charles
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
A Dubissette
2 player
K Murray
No Correlation
0.22
1 player
A Dubissette
2 player
P McSween
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.2
1 player
A Dubissette
2 player
D Hypolite
No Correlation
1
1 player
A Dubissette
2 player
A Dubissette
Strong Positive Correlation
0.16
1 player
A Dubissette
2 player
J Hazzard
No Correlation
0.05
1 player
A Dubissette
2 player
H Jackson
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
A Dubissette
2 player
D Nedd
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.27
1 player
A Dubissette
2 player
D Smith
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.26
1 player
J Hazzard
2 player
K Andrew
Weak Negative Correlation
0.56
1 player
J Hazzard
2 player
C Blache
Positive Correlation
-0.5
1 player
J Hazzard
2 player
C Charles
Negative Correlation
0.45
1 player
J Hazzard
2 player
K Murray
Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
J Hazzard
2 player
P McSween
No Correlation
0.67
1 player
J Hazzard
2 player
D Hypolite
Positive Correlation
0.16
1 player
J Hazzard
2 player
A Dubissette
No Correlation
1
1 player
J Hazzard
2 player
J Hazzard
Strong Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
J Hazzard
2 player
H Jackson
No Correlation
0.13
1 player
J Hazzard
2 player
D Nedd
No Correlation
-0.09
1 player
J Hazzard
2 player
D Smith
No Correlation
-0.26
1 player
H Jackson
2 player
K Andrew
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.56
1 player
H Jackson
2 player
C Blache
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
H Jackson
2 player
C Charles
No Correlation
0.09
1 player
H Jackson
2 player
K Murray
No Correlation
0.6
1 player
H Jackson
2 player
P McSween
Positive Correlation
-0.09
1 player
H Jackson
2 player
D Hypolite
No Correlation
0.05
1 player
H Jackson
2 player
A Dubissette
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
H Jackson
2 player
J Hazzard
No Correlation
1
1 player
H Jackson
2 player
H Jackson
Strong Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
H Jackson
2 player
D Nedd
Weak Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
H Jackson
2 player
D Smith
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.58
1 player
D Nedd
2 player
K Andrew
Negative Correlation
0.11
1 player
D Nedd
2 player
C Blache
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
D Nedd
2 player
C Charles
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.27
1 player
D Nedd
2 player
K Murray
Weak Negative Correlation
0.2
1 player
D Nedd
2 player
P McSween
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
D Nedd
2 player
D Hypolite
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
D Nedd
2 player
A Dubissette
Weak Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
D Nedd
2 player
J Hazzard
No Correlation
0.22
1 player
D Nedd
2 player
H Jackson
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
D Nedd
2 player
D Nedd
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.08
1 player
D Nedd
2 player
D Smith
No Correlation
-0.09
1 player
D Smith
2 player
K Andrew
No Correlation
0
1 player
D Smith
2 player
C Blache
No Correlation
-0.25
1 player
D Smith
2 player
C Charles
Weak Negative Correlation
0.09
1 player
D Smith
2 player
K Murray
No Correlation
0.27
1 player
D Smith
2 player
P McSween
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.09
1 player
D Smith
2 player
D Hypolite
No Correlation
-0.27
1 player
D Smith
2 player
A Dubissette
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.09
1 player
D Smith
2 player
J Hazzard
No Correlation
0.27
1 player
D Smith
2 player
H Jackson
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.08
1 player
D Smith
2 player
D Nedd
No Correlation
1
1 player
D Smith
2 player
D Smith
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick P McSween and H Jackson together
Positive Correlation

Pick C Blache and P McSween together
Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 D Nedd

BAT
Similar Perfomance
D Hypolite 0.33
C Charles 0.25
H Jackson 0.22
P McSween 0.2
A Dubissette 0.2
J Hazzard 0.13
C Blache 0.11
Opposite Perfomance
K Andrew -0.58
K Murray -0.27
D Smith -0.08

2 H Jackson

AR
Similar Perfomance
P McSween 0.6
D Smith 0.27
D Nedd 0.22
J Hazzard 0.14
K Murray 0.09
A Dubissette 0.05
Opposite Perfomance
C Blache -0.56
K Andrew -0.26
D Hypolite -0.09

3 J Hazzard

WK
Similar Perfomance
D Hypolite 0.67
C Blache 0.56
K Murray 0.45
A Dubissette 0.16
H Jackson 0.14
D Nedd 0.13
P McSween 0.1
Opposite Perfomance
C Charles -0.5
K Andrew -0.26
D Smith -0.09

4 P McSween

AR
Similar Perfomance
H Jackson 0.6
D Smith 0.27
A Dubissette 0.22
D Nedd 0.2
J Hazzard 0.1
K Murray 0.09
Opposite Perfomance
C Blache -0.78
D Hypolite -0.45
K Andrew -0.33
C Charles -0.25

5 A Dubissette

BOW
Similar Perfomance
C Charles 0.43
P McSween 0.22
D Nedd 0.2
J Hazzard 0.16
H Jackson 0.05
Opposite Perfomance
K Andrew -0.33
D Smith -0.27
C Blache -0.25
D Hypolite -0.2

Best GG Player Combinations

Best GG Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad
J Gian Benjamin WK GG
J Eugene AR GG
C Duncan BOW GG
D Charles BOW GG
K bartholomew BOW GG
J Jeremiah BAT GG
C Bartholomew AR GG
R Williams BOW GG
L Lawrence WK GG
L Williams BOW GG
J Jeremiah BAT GG
J Gian Benjamin
J Eugene
C Duncan
D Charles
K bartholomew
J Jeremiah
C Bartholomew
R Williams
L Lawrence
L Williams
J Jeremiah
1
1 player
J Gian Benjamin
2 player
J Gian Benjamin
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
J Gian Benjamin
2 player
J Eugene
Weak Negative Correlation
0.25
1 player
J Gian Benjamin
2 player
C Duncan
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.56
1 player
J Gian Benjamin
2 player
D Charles
Negative Correlation
0.23
1 player
J Gian Benjamin
2 player
K bartholomew
Weak Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
J Gian Benjamin
2 player
J Jeremiah
No Correlation
0
1 player
J Gian Benjamin
2 player
C Bartholomew
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
J Gian Benjamin
2 player
R Williams
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
J Gian Benjamin
2 player
L Lawrence
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.27
1 player
J Gian Benjamin
2 player
L Williams
Weak Negative Correlation
0.27
1 player
J Gian Benjamin
2 player
J Jeremiah
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
J Eugene
2 player
J Gian Benjamin
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
J Eugene
2 player
J Eugene
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
J Eugene
2 player
C Duncan
No Correlation
0.75
1 player
J Eugene
2 player
D Charles
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
J Eugene
2 player
K bartholomew
Negative Correlation
-0.25
1 player
J Eugene
2 player
J Jeremiah
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.43
1 player
J Eugene
2 player
C Bartholomew
Negative Correlation
-0.25
1 player
J Eugene
2 player
R Williams
Weak Negative Correlation
0.43
1 player
J Eugene
2 player
L Lawrence
Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
J Eugene
2 player
L Williams
Weak Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
J Eugene
2 player
J Jeremiah
Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
C Duncan
2 player
J Gian Benjamin
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
C Duncan
2 player
J Eugene
No Correlation
1
1 player
C Duncan
2 player
C Duncan
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
C Duncan
2 player
D Charles
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
C Duncan
2 player
K bartholomew
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.25
1 player
C Duncan
2 player
J Jeremiah
Weak Negative Correlation
0.25
1 player
C Duncan
2 player
C Bartholomew
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
C Duncan
2 player
R Williams
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
C Duncan
2 player
L Lawrence
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.11
1 player
C Duncan
2 player
L Williams
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
C Duncan
2 player
J Jeremiah
No Correlation
-0.56
1 player
D Charles
2 player
J Gian Benjamin
Negative Correlation
0.75
1 player
D Charles
2 player
J Eugene
Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
D Charles
2 player
C Duncan
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
D Charles
2 player
D Charles
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
D Charles
2 player
K bartholomew
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
D Charles
2 player
J Jeremiah
No Correlation
-0.71
1 player
D Charles
2 player
C Bartholomew
Negative Correlation
-0.27
1 player
D Charles
2 player
R Williams
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
D Charles
2 player
L Lawrence
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
D Charles
2 player
L Williams
Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
D Charles
2 player
J Jeremiah
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
K bartholomew
2 player
J Gian Benjamin
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
K bartholomew
2 player
J Eugene
Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
K bartholomew
2 player
C Duncan
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
K bartholomew
2 player
D Charles
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
K bartholomew
2 player
K bartholomew
Strong Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
K bartholomew
2 player
J Jeremiah
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
K bartholomew
2 player
C Bartholomew
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
K bartholomew
2 player
R Williams
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
K bartholomew
2 player
L Lawrence
Negative Correlation
0.23
1 player
K bartholomew
2 player
L Williams
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
K bartholomew
2 player
J Jeremiah
Negative Correlation
0.11
1 player
J Jeremiah
2 player
J Gian Benjamin
No Correlation
-0.25
1 player
J Jeremiah
2 player
J Eugene
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.25
1 player
J Jeremiah
2 player
C Duncan
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
J Jeremiah
2 player
D Charles
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
J Jeremiah
2 player
K bartholomew
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
J Jeremiah
2 player
J Jeremiah
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
J Jeremiah
2 player
C Bartholomew
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
J Jeremiah
2 player
R Williams
Weak Negative Correlation
0.5
1 player
J Jeremiah
2 player
L Lawrence
Positive Correlation
-0.11
1 player
J Jeremiah
2 player
L Williams
No Correlation
-0.11
1 player
J Jeremiah
2 player
J Jeremiah
No Correlation
0
1 player
C Bartholomew
2 player
J Gian Benjamin
No Correlation
-0.43
1 player
C Bartholomew
2 player
J Eugene
Negative Correlation
0.25
1 player
C Bartholomew
2 player
C Duncan
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.71
1 player
C Bartholomew
2 player
D Charles
Negative Correlation
0.23
1 player
C Bartholomew
2 player
K bartholomew
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
C Bartholomew
2 player
J Jeremiah
No Correlation
1
1 player
C Bartholomew
2 player
C Bartholomew
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
C Bartholomew
2 player
R Williams
No Correlation
0
1 player
C Bartholomew
2 player
L Lawrence
No Correlation
0
1 player
C Bartholomew
2 player
L Williams
No Correlation
-0.75
1 player
C Bartholomew
2 player
J Jeremiah
Negative Correlation
0.2
1 player
R Williams
2 player
J Gian Benjamin
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
R Williams
2 player
J Eugene
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.25
1 player
R Williams
2 player
C Duncan
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.27
1 player
R Williams
2 player
D Charles
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
R Williams
2 player
K bartholomew
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
R Williams
2 player
J Jeremiah
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
R Williams
2 player
C Bartholomew
No Correlation
1
1 player
R Williams
2 player
R Williams
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
R Williams
2 player
L Lawrence
No Correlation
-0.67
1 player
R Williams
2 player
L Williams
Negative Correlation
0.08
1 player
R Williams
2 player
J Jeremiah
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
L Lawrence
2 player
J Gian Benjamin
Weak Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
L Lawrence
2 player
J Eugene
Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
L Lawrence
2 player
C Duncan
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
L Lawrence
2 player
D Charles
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
L Lawrence
2 player
K bartholomew
Negative Correlation
0.5
1 player
L Lawrence
2 player
J Jeremiah
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
L Lawrence
2 player
C Bartholomew
No Correlation
0
1 player
L Lawrence
2 player
R Williams
No Correlation
1
1 player
L Lawrence
2 player
L Lawrence
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.06
1 player
L Lawrence
2 player
L Williams
No Correlation
0.52
1 player
L Lawrence
2 player
J Jeremiah
Positive Correlation
-0.27
1 player
L Williams
2 player
J Gian Benjamin
Weak Negative Correlation
0.25
1 player
L Williams
2 player
J Eugene
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.11
1 player
L Williams
2 player
C Duncan
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
L Williams
2 player
D Charles
Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
L Williams
2 player
K bartholomew
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.11
1 player
L Williams
2 player
J Jeremiah
No Correlation
0
1 player
L Williams
2 player
C Bartholomew
No Correlation
-0.67
1 player
L Williams
2 player
R Williams
Negative Correlation
-0.06
1 player
L Williams
2 player
L Lawrence
No Correlation
1
1 player
L Williams
2 player
L Williams
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
L Williams
2 player
J Jeremiah
No Correlation
0.27
1 player
J Jeremiah
2 player
J Gian Benjamin
Weak Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
J Jeremiah
2 player
J Eugene
Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
J Jeremiah
2 player
C Duncan
No Correlation
0.18
1 player
J Jeremiah
2 player
D Charles
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
J Jeremiah
2 player
K bartholomew
Negative Correlation
-0.11
1 player
J Jeremiah
2 player
J Jeremiah
No Correlation
-0.75
1 player
J Jeremiah
2 player
C Bartholomew
Negative Correlation
0.08
1 player
J Jeremiah
2 player
R Williams
No Correlation
0.52
1 player
J Jeremiah
2 player
L Lawrence
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
J Jeremiah
2 player
L Williams
No Correlation
1
1 player
J Jeremiah
2 player
J Jeremiah
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick J Eugene and D Charles together
Positive Correlation

Pick J Eugene and K bartholomew together
Negative Correlation

Pick D Charles and C Bartholomew together
Negative Correlation

Pick K bartholomew and L Lawrence together
Negative Correlation

Pick K bartholomew and J Jeremiah together
Negative Correlation

Pick C Bartholomew and J Jeremiah together
Negative Correlation

Pick R Williams and L Williams together
Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 J Jeremiah

BAT
Similar Perfomance
L Lawrence 0.52
J Eugene 0.5
J Gian Benjamin 0.27
D Charles 0.18
C Duncan 0.11
R Williams 0.08
Opposite Perfomance
C Bartholomew -0.75
K bartholomew -0.7
J Jeremiah -0.11

2 L Lawrence

WK
Similar Perfomance
J Jeremiah 0.52
J Jeremiah 0.5
J Eugene 0.43
J Gian Benjamin 0.2
Opposite Perfomance
K bartholomew -0.7
C Duncan -0.33
L Williams -0.06

3 L Williams

BOW
Similar Perfomance
D Charles 0.5
J Eugene 0.25
K bartholomew 0.23
Opposite Perfomance
R Williams -0.67
J Gian Benjamin -0.27
C Duncan -0.11
J Jeremiah -0.11
L Lawrence -0.06

4 D Charles

BOW
Similar Perfomance
J Eugene 0.75
L Williams 0.5
J Jeremiah 0.18
Opposite Perfomance
C Bartholomew -0.71
J Gian Benjamin -0.56
R Williams -0.27
C Duncan -0.25
K bartholomew -0.23

5 J Gian Benjamin

WK
Similar Perfomance
J Jeremiah 0.27
C Duncan 0.25
K bartholomew 0.23
R Williams 0.2
L Lawrence 0.2
J Jeremiah 0.11
Opposite Perfomance
D Charles -0.56
L Williams -0.27
J Eugene -0.25

PerfectLineup © 2024. All Rights Reserved