Upcoming
Fixtures
View All
CH-W 12 Jan 05:10 am OS-W

Lineup Out

Fitzherbert Park
Women New Zealand T20 Domestic

Best Player Combinations For
CH-W vs OS-W

How it Works?

This guide is super useful for identifying player combinations that are likely to score big. Use the filters to identify the best player combinations according to specific match scenarios.

Player correlate positively

Both players generally perform similarly when picked together. They either score high together or score low together. Maximise FPts by picking players that correlate positively with top players.

Player correlate negatively

Both players generally perform in an opposite manner. If one player scores high, the other usually scores low. Avoid picking players that correlate negatively with top player

More on PL Labs

CH-W vs OS-W

Show Player Combinations on the basis of:

Best CH-W Player Combinations

Best CH-W Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
F Devonshire AR CH-W
H Armitage BAT CH-W
K Tomlinson BAT CH-W
M Greig BAT CH-W
H Rowe AR CH-W
C Green BOW CH-W
G Atkinson BAT CH-W
R Mair BOW CH-W
T Newton BAT CH-W
K Gaging WK CH-W
O Bartlett BOW CH-W
F Devonshire
H Armitage
K Tomlinson
M Greig
H Rowe
C Green
G Atkinson
R Mair
T Newton
K Gaging
O Bartlett
1
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
F Devonshire
Strong Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
H Armitage
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
K Tomlinson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.19
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
M Greig
No Correlation
-0.08
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
H Rowe
No Correlation
0.29
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
C Green
Weak Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
G Atkinson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
R Mair
No Correlation
0.24
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
T Newton
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
K Gaging
Weak Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
O Bartlett
Weak Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
F Devonshire
No Correlation
1
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
H Armitage
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.06
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
K Tomlinson
No Correlation
0.17
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
M Greig
No Correlation
0.32
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
H Rowe
Weak Positive Correlation
0.19
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
C Green
No Correlation
0.06
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
G Atkinson
No Correlation
0.36
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
R Mair
Weak Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
T Newton
Weak Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
K Gaging
Weak Positive Correlation
0.16
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
O Bartlett
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
K Tomlinson
2 player
F Devonshire
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.06
1 player
K Tomlinson
2 player
H Armitage
No Correlation
1
1 player
K Tomlinson
2 player
K Tomlinson
Strong Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
K Tomlinson
2 player
M Greig
Weak Positive Correlation
0.04
1 player
K Tomlinson
2 player
H Rowe
No Correlation
0.32
1 player
K Tomlinson
2 player
C Green
Weak Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
K Tomlinson
2 player
G Atkinson
Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
K Tomlinson
2 player
R Mair
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
K Tomlinson
2 player
T Newton
Weak Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
K Tomlinson
2 player
K Gaging
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
K Tomlinson
2 player
O Bartlett
Weak Positive Correlation
0.19
1 player
M Greig
2 player
F Devonshire
No Correlation
0.17
1 player
M Greig
2 player
H Armitage
No Correlation
0.39
1 player
M Greig
2 player
K Tomlinson
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M Greig
2 player
M Greig
Strong Positive Correlation
0.04
1 player
M Greig
2 player
H Rowe
No Correlation
0.04
1 player
M Greig
2 player
C Green
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
M Greig
2 player
G Atkinson
Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
M Greig
2 player
R Mair
No Correlation
0.47
1 player
M Greig
2 player
T Newton
Positive Correlation
0.56
1 player
M Greig
2 player
K Gaging
Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
M Greig
2 player
O Bartlett
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.08
1 player
H Rowe
2 player
F Devonshire
No Correlation
0.32
1 player
H Rowe
2 player
H Armitage
Weak Positive Correlation
0.04
1 player
H Rowe
2 player
K Tomlinson
No Correlation
0.04
1 player
H Rowe
2 player
M Greig
No Correlation
1
1 player
H Rowe
2 player
H Rowe
Strong Positive Correlation
0.46
1 player
H Rowe
2 player
C Green
Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
H Rowe
2 player
G Atkinson
No Correlation
0.37
1 player
H Rowe
2 player
R Mair
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
H Rowe
2 player
T Newton
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.1
1 player
H Rowe
2 player
K Gaging
No Correlation
-0.05
1 player
H Rowe
2 player
O Bartlett
No Correlation
0.29
1 player
C Green
2 player
F Devonshire
Weak Positive Correlation
0.19
1 player
C Green
2 player
H Armitage
No Correlation
0.32
1 player
C Green
2 player
K Tomlinson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.04
1 player
C Green
2 player
M Greig
No Correlation
0.46
1 player
C Green
2 player
H Rowe
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
C Green
2 player
C Green
Strong Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
C Green
2 player
G Atkinson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
C Green
2 player
R Mair
Weak Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
C Green
2 player
T Newton
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
C Green
2 player
K Gaging
Weak Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
C Green
2 player
O Bartlett
Weak Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
G Atkinson
2 player
F Devonshire
Weak Positive Correlation
0.06
1 player
G Atkinson
2 player
H Armitage
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
G Atkinson
2 player
K Tomlinson
Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
G Atkinson
2 player
M Greig
Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
G Atkinson
2 player
H Rowe
No Correlation
0.34
1 player
G Atkinson
2 player
C Green
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
G Atkinson
2 player
G Atkinson
Strong Positive Correlation
0.04
1 player
G Atkinson
2 player
R Mair
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
G Atkinson
2 player
T Newton
Weak Positive Correlation
0.59
1 player
G Atkinson
2 player
K Gaging
Positive Correlation
0.41
1 player
G Atkinson
2 player
O Bartlett
Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
R Mair
2 player
F Devonshire
No Correlation
0.36
1 player
R Mair
2 player
H Armitage
Weak Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
R Mair
2 player
K Tomlinson
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
R Mair
2 player
M Greig
No Correlation
0.37
1 player
R Mair
2 player
H Rowe
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
R Mair
2 player
C Green
Weak Positive Correlation
0.04
1 player
R Mair
2 player
G Atkinson
No Correlation
1
1 player
R Mair
2 player
R Mair
Strong Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
R Mair
2 player
T Newton
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
R Mair
2 player
K Gaging
Weak Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
R Mair
2 player
O Bartlett
Weak Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
T Newton
2 player
F Devonshire
Weak Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
T Newton
2 player
H Armitage
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
T Newton
2 player
K Tomlinson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
T Newton
2 player
M Greig
Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
T Newton
2 player
H Rowe
Weak Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
T Newton
2 player
C Green
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
T Newton
2 player
G Atkinson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
T Newton
2 player
R Mair
No Correlation
1
1 player
T Newton
2 player
T Newton
Strong Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
T Newton
2 player
K Gaging
No Correlation
-0.06
1 player
T Newton
2 player
O Bartlett
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
K Gaging
2 player
F Devonshire
Weak Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
K Gaging
2 player
H Armitage
Weak Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
K Gaging
2 player
K Tomlinson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.56
1 player
K Gaging
2 player
M Greig
Positive Correlation
-0.1
1 player
K Gaging
2 player
H Rowe
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
K Gaging
2 player
C Green
Weak Positive Correlation
0.59
1 player
K Gaging
2 player
G Atkinson
Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
K Gaging
2 player
R Mair
Weak Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
K Gaging
2 player
T Newton
No Correlation
1
1 player
K Gaging
2 player
K Gaging
Strong Positive Correlation
0.46
1 player
K Gaging
2 player
O Bartlett
Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
O Bartlett
2 player
F Devonshire
Weak Positive Correlation
0.16
1 player
O Bartlett
2 player
H Armitage
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
O Bartlett
2 player
K Tomlinson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
O Bartlett
2 player
M Greig
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.05
1 player
O Bartlett
2 player
H Rowe
No Correlation
0.26
1 player
O Bartlett
2 player
C Green
Weak Positive Correlation
0.41
1 player
O Bartlett
2 player
G Atkinson
Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
O Bartlett
2 player
R Mair
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.06
1 player
O Bartlett
2 player
T Newton
No Correlation
0.46
1 player
O Bartlett
2 player
K Gaging
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
O Bartlett
2 player
O Bartlett
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

No data found

High Performing Players

1 H Rowe

AR
Similar Perfomance
C Green 0.46
R Mair 0.37
H Armitage 0.32
T Newton 0.2
G Atkinson 0.08
K Tomlinson 0.04
M Greig 0.04
Opposite Perfomance
K Gaging -0.1
F Devonshire -0.08
O Bartlett -0.05

2 R Mair

BOW
Similar Perfomance
H Rowe 0.37
H Armitage 0.36
O Bartlett 0.3
C Green 0.28
K Gaging 0.23
M Greig 0.14
F Devonshire 0.12
K Tomlinson 0.12
T Newton 0.08
G Atkinson 0.04

3 C Green

BOW
Similar Perfomance
H Rowe 0.46
T Newton 0.38
G Atkinson 0.34
K Tomlinson 0.32
F Devonshire 0.29
R Mair 0.28
O Bartlett 0.26
K Gaging 0.25
H Armitage 0.19
M Greig 0.04

4 H Armitage

BAT
Similar Perfomance
T Newton 0.36
R Mair 0.36
K Gaging 0.34
H Rowe 0.32
C Green 0.19
M Greig 0.17
O Bartlett 0.16
F Devonshire 0.15
G Atkinson 0.06
Opposite Perfomance
K Tomlinson -0.06

5 G Atkinson

BAT
Similar Perfomance
K Gaging 0.59
O Bartlett 0.41
K Tomlinson 0.4
M Greig 0.4
C Green 0.34
F Devonshire 0.3
T Newton 0.28
H Rowe 0.08
H Armitage 0.06
R Mair 0.04

Best OS-W Player Combinations

Best OS-W Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
A Browning AR OS-W
K Gordon BOW OS-W
B James WK OS-W
E Carson BOW OS-W
C Blakely BAT OS-W
H Jensen AR OS-W
E Black AR OS-W
F Leydon-Davis AR OS-W
O Gain BAT OS-W
P Inglis WK OS-W
P Watkins BOW OS-W
A Browning
K Gordon
B James
E Carson
C Blakely
H Jensen
E Black
F Leydon-Davis
O Gain
P Inglis
P Watkins
1
1 player
A Browning
2 player
A Browning
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
A Browning
2 player
K Gordon
No Correlation
0.27
1 player
A Browning
2 player
B James
Weak Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
A Browning
2 player
E Carson
No Correlation
0.32
1 player
A Browning
2 player
C Blakely
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
A Browning
2 player
H Jensen
Weak Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
A Browning
2 player
E Black
No Correlation
0.3
1 player
A Browning
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
A Browning
2 player
O Gain
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
A Browning
2 player
P Inglis
Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
A Browning
2 player
P Watkins
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
A Browning
No Correlation
1
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
K Gordon
Strong Positive Correlation
0.06
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
B James
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
E Carson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
C Blakely
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
H Jensen
Weak Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
E Black
Weak Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.13
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
O Gain
No Correlation
0.17
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
P Inglis
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
P Watkins
Weak Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
B James
2 player
A Browning
Weak Positive Correlation
0.06
1 player
B James
2 player
K Gordon
No Correlation
1
1 player
B James
2 player
B James
Strong Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
B James
2 player
E Carson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
B James
2 player
C Blakely
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
B James
2 player
H Jensen
Weak Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
B James
2 player
E Black
Weak Positive Correlation
0.37
1 player
B James
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.48
1 player
B James
2 player
O Gain
Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
B James
2 player
P Inglis
Positive Correlation
-0.24
1 player
B James
2 player
P Watkins
Weak Negative Correlation
0.18
1 player
E Carson
2 player
A Browning
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
E Carson
2 player
K Gordon
Weak Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
E Carson
2 player
B James
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
E Carson
2 player
E Carson
Strong Positive Correlation
0.06
1 player
E Carson
2 player
C Blakely
No Correlation
0.26
1 player
E Carson
2 player
H Jensen
Weak Positive Correlation
0.44
1 player
E Carson
2 player
E Black
Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
E Carson
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.19
1 player
E Carson
2 player
O Gain
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
E Carson
2 player
P Inglis
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.04
1 player
E Carson
2 player
P Watkins
No Correlation
0.32
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
A Browning
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
K Gordon
Weak Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
B James
Weak Positive Correlation
0.06
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
E Carson
No Correlation
1
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
C Blakely
Strong Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
H Jensen
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
E Black
No Correlation
0.34
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
O Gain
Weak Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
P Inglis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
P Watkins
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
A Browning
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
K Gordon
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
B James
Weak Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
E Carson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
C Blakely
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
H Jensen
Strong Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
E Black
Positive Correlation
0.41
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
O Gain
Weak Positive Correlation
0.37
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
P Inglis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.41
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
P Watkins
Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
E Black
2 player
A Browning
No Correlation
0.31
1 player
E Black
2 player
K Gordon
Weak Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
E Black
2 player
B James
Weak Positive Correlation
0.44
1 player
E Black
2 player
E Carson
Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
E Black
2 player
C Blakely
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
E Black
2 player
H Jensen
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
E Black
2 player
E Black
Strong Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
E Black
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
E Black
2 player
O Gain
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
E Black
2 player
P Inglis
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.03
1 player
E Black
2 player
P Watkins
No Correlation
0.3
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
A Browning
Weak Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
K Gordon
Weak Positive Correlation
0.37
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
B James
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
E Carson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
C Blakely
Weak Positive Correlation
0.41
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
H Jensen
Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
E Black
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
Strong Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
O Gain
Weak Positive Correlation
0.46
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
P Inglis
Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
P Watkins
Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
O Gain
2 player
A Browning
No Correlation
-0.13
1 player
O Gain
2 player
K Gordon
No Correlation
0.48
1 player
O Gain
2 player
B James
Positive Correlation
0.19
1 player
O Gain
2 player
E Carson
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
O Gain
2 player
C Blakely
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
O Gain
2 player
H Jensen
Weak Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
O Gain
2 player
E Black
Weak Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
O Gain
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
O Gain
2 player
O Gain
Strong Positive Correlation
0.37
1 player
O Gain
2 player
P Inglis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
O Gain
2 player
P Watkins
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
A Browning
Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
K Gordon
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
B James
Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
E Carson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
C Blakely
Weak Positive Correlation
0.37
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
H Jensen
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
E Black
Weak Positive Correlation
0.46
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
Positive Correlation
0.37
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
O Gain
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
P Inglis
Strong Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
P Watkins
Weak Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
P Watkins
2 player
A Browning
Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
P Watkins
2 player
K Gordon
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.24
1 player
P Watkins
2 player
B James
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.04
1 player
P Watkins
2 player
E Carson
No Correlation
0.12
1 player
P Watkins
2 player
C Blakely
No Correlation
0.41
1 player
P Watkins
2 player
H Jensen
Positive Correlation
-0.03
1 player
P Watkins
2 player
E Black
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
P Watkins
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
P Watkins
2 player
O Gain
No Correlation
0.38
1 player
P Watkins
2 player
P Inglis
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
P Watkins
2 player
P Watkins
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

No data found

High Performing Players

1 E Carson

BOW
Similar Perfomance
E Black 0.44
F Leydon-Davis 0.28
B James 0.27
H Jensen 0.26
K Gordon 0.25
P Inglis 0.2
O Gain 0.19
A Browning 0.18
C Blakely 0.06
Opposite Perfomance
P Watkins -0.04

2 E Black

AR
Similar Perfomance
E Carson 0.44
H Jensen 0.4
F Leydon-Davis 0.39
B James 0.34
P Inglis 0.33
K Gordon 0.31
O Gain 0.22
A Browning 0.18
C Blakely 0.14
Opposite Perfomance
P Watkins -0.03

3 H Jensen

AR
Similar Perfomance
F Leydon-Davis 0.41
P Watkins 0.41
E Black 0.4
P Inglis 0.37
C Blakely 0.32
K Gordon 0.28
E Carson 0.26
B James 0.25
O Gain 0.23
A Browning 0.2

4 P Inglis

WK
Similar Perfomance
F Leydon-Davis 0.46
A Browning 0.42
B James 0.42
P Watkins 0.38
H Jensen 0.37
O Gain 0.37
C Blakely 0.36
E Black 0.33
E Carson 0.2
K Gordon 0.17

5 C Blakely

BAT
Similar Perfomance
P Inglis 0.36
F Leydon-Davis 0.34
A Browning 0.32
H Jensen 0.32
O Gain 0.28
B James 0.26
K Gordon 0.25
E Black 0.14
P Watkins 0.12
E Carson 0.06

Best CH-W Player Combinations

Best CH-W Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
F Devonshire AR CH-W
H Armitage BAT CH-W
K Tomlinson BAT CH-W
M Greig BAT CH-W
H Rowe AR CH-W
C Green BOW CH-W
G Atkinson BAT CH-W
R Mair BOW CH-W
T Newton BAT CH-W
K Gaging WK CH-W
O Bartlett BOW CH-W
F Devonshire
H Armitage
K Tomlinson
M Greig
H Rowe
C Green
G Atkinson
R Mair
T Newton
K Gaging
O Bartlett
1
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
F Devonshire
Strong Positive Correlation
0.06
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
H Armitage
No Correlation
-0.25
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
K Tomlinson
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.2
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
M Greig
No Correlation
-0.52
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
H Rowe
Negative Correlation
-0.25
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
C Green
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.08
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
G Atkinson
No Correlation
-0.13
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
R Mair
No Correlation
-0.06
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
T Newton
No Correlation
-0.23
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
K Gaging
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.08
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
O Bartlett
No Correlation
0.06
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
F Devonshire
No Correlation
1
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
H Armitage
Strong Positive Correlation
-1
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
K Tomlinson
Strong Negative Correlation
-0.18
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
M Greig
No Correlation
0.6
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
H Rowe
Positive Correlation
-0.12
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
C Green
No Correlation
-0.62
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
G Atkinson
Negative Correlation
0.6
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
R Mair
Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
T Newton
No Correlation
0.09
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
K Gaging
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
O Bartlett
No Correlation
-0.25
1 player
K Tomlinson
2 player
F Devonshire
Weak Negative Correlation
-1
1 player
K Tomlinson
2 player
H Armitage
Strong Negative Correlation
1
1 player
K Tomlinson
2 player
K Tomlinson
Strong Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
K Tomlinson
2 player
M Greig
No Correlation
-0.53
1 player
K Tomlinson
2 player
H Rowe
Negative Correlation
-0.1
1 player
K Tomlinson
2 player
C Green
No Correlation
0.26
1 player
K Tomlinson
2 player
G Atkinson
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.18
1 player
K Tomlinson
2 player
R Mair
No Correlation
-0.09
1 player
K Tomlinson
2 player
T Newton
No Correlation
0
1 player
K Tomlinson
2 player
K Gaging
No Correlation
-0.23
1 player
K Tomlinson
2 player
O Bartlett
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.2
1 player
M Greig
2 player
F Devonshire
No Correlation
-0.18
1 player
M Greig
2 player
H Armitage
No Correlation
0.1
1 player
M Greig
2 player
K Tomlinson
No Correlation
1
1 player
M Greig
2 player
M Greig
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.08
1 player
M Greig
2 player
H Rowe
No Correlation
-0.52
1 player
M Greig
2 player
C Green
Negative Correlation
-0.1
1 player
M Greig
2 player
G Atkinson
No Correlation
-0.19
1 player
M Greig
2 player
R Mair
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
M Greig
2 player
T Newton
No Correlation
0.43
1 player
M Greig
2 player
K Gaging
Positive Correlation
-0.29
1 player
M Greig
2 player
O Bartlett
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.52
1 player
H Rowe
2 player
F Devonshire
Negative Correlation
0.6
1 player
H Rowe
2 player
H Armitage
Positive Correlation
-0.53
1 player
H Rowe
2 player
K Tomlinson
Negative Correlation
-0.08
1 player
H Rowe
2 player
M Greig
No Correlation
1
1 player
H Rowe
2 player
H Rowe
Strong Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
H Rowe
2 player
C Green
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.36
1 player
H Rowe
2 player
G Atkinson
Weak Negative Correlation
0.3
1 player
H Rowe
2 player
R Mair
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
H Rowe
2 player
T Newton
No Correlation
-0.27
1 player
H Rowe
2 player
K Gaging
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
H Rowe
2 player
O Bartlett
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.25
1 player
C Green
2 player
F Devonshire
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.12
1 player
C Green
2 player
H Armitage
No Correlation
-0.1
1 player
C Green
2 player
K Tomlinson
No Correlation
-0.52
1 player
C Green
2 player
M Greig
Negative Correlation
0.23
1 player
C Green
2 player
H Rowe
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
C Green
2 player
C Green
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
C Green
2 player
G Atkinson
No Correlation
0
1 player
C Green
2 player
R Mair
No Correlation
0.06
1 player
C Green
2 player
T Newton
No Correlation
-0.23
1 player
C Green
2 player
K Gaging
Weak Negative Correlation
0.12
1 player
C Green
2 player
O Bartlett
No Correlation
-0.08
1 player
G Atkinson
2 player
F Devonshire
No Correlation
-0.62
1 player
G Atkinson
2 player
H Armitage
Negative Correlation
0.26
1 player
G Atkinson
2 player
K Tomlinson
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.1
1 player
G Atkinson
2 player
M Greig
No Correlation
-0.36
1 player
G Atkinson
2 player
H Rowe
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
G Atkinson
2 player
C Green
No Correlation
1
1 player
G Atkinson
2 player
G Atkinson
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.46
1 player
G Atkinson
2 player
R Mair
Negative Correlation
-0.29
1 player
G Atkinson
2 player
T Newton
Weak Negative Correlation
0.38
1 player
G Atkinson
2 player
K Gaging
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
G Atkinson
2 player
O Bartlett
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.13
1 player
R Mair
2 player
F Devonshire
No Correlation
0.6
1 player
R Mair
2 player
H Armitage
Positive Correlation
-0.18
1 player
R Mair
2 player
K Tomlinson
No Correlation
-0.19
1 player
R Mair
2 player
M Greig
No Correlation
0.3
1 player
R Mair
2 player
H Rowe
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
R Mair
2 player
C Green
No Correlation
-0.46
1 player
R Mair
2 player
G Atkinson
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
R Mair
2 player
R Mair
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
R Mair
2 player
T Newton
Weak Negative Correlation
0.17
1 player
R Mair
2 player
K Gaging
No Correlation
0.29
1 player
R Mair
2 player
O Bartlett
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.06
1 player
T Newton
2 player
F Devonshire
No Correlation
0.12
1 player
T Newton
2 player
H Armitage
No Correlation
-0.09
1 player
T Newton
2 player
K Tomlinson
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
T Newton
2 player
M Greig
No Correlation
0
1 player
T Newton
2 player
H Rowe
No Correlation
0.06
1 player
T Newton
2 player
C Green
No Correlation
-0.29
1 player
T Newton
2 player
G Atkinson
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.25
1 player
T Newton
2 player
R Mair
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
T Newton
2 player
T Newton
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.6
1 player
T Newton
2 player
K Gaging
Negative Correlation
-0.56
1 player
T Newton
2 player
O Bartlett
Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
K Gaging
2 player
F Devonshire
Weak Negative Correlation
0.09
1 player
K Gaging
2 player
H Armitage
No Correlation
0
1 player
K Gaging
2 player
K Tomlinson
No Correlation
0.43
1 player
K Gaging
2 player
M Greig
Positive Correlation
-0.27
1 player
K Gaging
2 player
H Rowe
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
K Gaging
2 player
C Green
Weak Negative Correlation
0.38
1 player
K Gaging
2 player
G Atkinson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
K Gaging
2 player
R Mair
No Correlation
-0.6
1 player
K Gaging
2 player
T Newton
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
K Gaging
2 player
K Gaging
Strong Positive Correlation
0.6
1 player
K Gaging
2 player
O Bartlett
Positive Correlation
-0.08
1 player
O Bartlett
2 player
F Devonshire
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
O Bartlett
2 player
H Armitage
No Correlation
-0.23
1 player
O Bartlett
2 player
K Tomlinson
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.29
1 player
O Bartlett
2 player
M Greig
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
O Bartlett
2 player
H Rowe
Weak Negative Correlation
0.12
1 player
O Bartlett
2 player
C Green
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
O Bartlett
2 player
G Atkinson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.29
1 player
O Bartlett
2 player
R Mair
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.56
1 player
O Bartlett
2 player
T Newton
Negative Correlation
0.6
1 player
O Bartlett
2 player
K Gaging
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
O Bartlett
2 player
O Bartlett
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick H Armitage and H Rowe together
Positive Correlation

Pick H Armitage and R Mair together
Positive Correlation

Pick K Gaging and O Bartlett together
Positive Correlation

Pick H Armitage and K Tomlinson together
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick H Armitage and G Atkinson together
Negative Correlation

Pick T Newton and K Gaging together
Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 H Rowe

AR
Similar Perfomance
H Armitage 0.6
R Mair 0.3
C Green 0.23
Opposite Perfomance
K Tomlinson -0.53
F Devonshire -0.52
G Atkinson -0.36
K Gaging -0.27
O Bartlett -0.23
M Greig -0.08

2 R Mair

BOW
Similar Perfomance
H Armitage 0.6
H Rowe 0.3
O Bartlett 0.29
K Gaging 0.17
Opposite Perfomance
G Atkinson -0.46
T Newton -0.25
M Greig -0.19
K Tomlinson -0.18
F Devonshire -0.13

3 C Green

BOW
Similar Perfomance
H Rowe 0.23
O Bartlett 0.12
T Newton 0.06
Opposite Perfomance
M Greig -0.52
F Devonshire -0.25
K Gaging -0.23
H Armitage -0.12
K Tomlinson -0.1

4 H Armitage

BAT
Similar Perfomance
R Mair 0.6
H Rowe 0.6
T Newton 0.12
K Gaging 0.09
F Devonshire 0.06
Opposite Perfomance
K Tomlinson -1
G Atkinson -0.62
M Greig -0.18
O Bartlett -0.14
C Green -0.12

5 M Greig

BAT
Similar Perfomance
K Gaging 0.43
T Newton 0.11
K Tomlinson 0.1
Opposite Perfomance
C Green -0.52
O Bartlett -0.29
F Devonshire -0.2
R Mair -0.19
H Armitage -0.18
G Atkinson -0.1
H Rowe -0.08

Best OS-W Player Combinations

Best OS-W Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
A Browning AR OS-W
K Gordon BOW OS-W
B James WK OS-W
E Carson BOW OS-W
C Blakely BAT OS-W
H Jensen AR OS-W
E Black AR OS-W
F Leydon-Davis AR OS-W
O Gain BAT OS-W
P Inglis WK OS-W
P Watkins BOW OS-W
A Browning
K Gordon
B James
E Carson
C Blakely
H Jensen
E Black
F Leydon-Davis
O Gain
P Inglis
P Watkins
1
1 player
A Browning
2 player
A Browning
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.56
1 player
A Browning
2 player
K Gordon
Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
A Browning
2 player
B James
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.17
1 player
A Browning
2 player
E Carson
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
A Browning
2 player
C Blakely
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
A Browning
2 player
H Jensen
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.38
1 player
A Browning
2 player
E Black
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.54
1 player
A Browning
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
A Browning
2 player
O Gain
Weak Negative Correlation
0.23
1 player
A Browning
2 player
P Inglis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
A Browning
2 player
P Watkins
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.56
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
A Browning
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
K Gordon
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
B James
Weak Negative Correlation
0.2
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
E Carson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
C Blakely
Weak Positive Correlation
0.6
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
H Jensen
Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
E Black
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.38
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
O Gain
Weak Negative Correlation
0.23
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
P Inglis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
P Watkins
Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
B James
2 player
A Browning
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
B James
2 player
K Gordon
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
B James
2 player
B James
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
B James
2 player
E Carson
No Correlation
-0.03
1 player
B James
2 player
C Blakely
No Correlation
-0.25
1 player
B James
2 player
H Jensen
Weak Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
B James
2 player
E Black
No Correlation
0.24
1 player
B James
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
B James
2 player
O Gain
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.03
1 player
B James
2 player
P Inglis
No Correlation
-1
1 player
B James
2 player
P Watkins
Strong Negative Correlation
-0.17
1 player
E Carson
2 player
A Browning
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
E Carson
2 player
K Gordon
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
E Carson
2 player
B James
No Correlation
1
1 player
E Carson
2 player
E Carson
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.2
1 player
E Carson
2 player
C Blakely
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
E Carson
2 player
H Jensen
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
E Carson
2 player
E Black
No Correlation
-0.12
1 player
E Carson
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
No Correlation
0
1 player
E Carson
2 player
O Gain
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
E Carson
2 player
P Inglis
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.2
1 player
E Carson
2 player
P Watkins
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
A Browning
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
K Gordon
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.03
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
B James
No Correlation
-0.2
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
E Carson
No Correlation
1
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
C Blakely
Strong Positive Correlation
0.04
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
H Jensen
No Correlation
-0.24
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
E Black
Weak Negative Correlation
0.07
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
No Correlation
-0.11
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
O Gain
No Correlation
-0.07
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
P Inglis
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
P Watkins
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
A Browning
Weak Negative Correlation
0.6
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
K Gordon
Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
B James
Weak Negative Correlation
0.08
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
E Carson
No Correlation
0.04
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
C Blakely
No Correlation
1
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
H Jensen
Strong Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
E Black
No Correlation
-0.04
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
No Correlation
-0.18
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
O Gain
No Correlation
0.04
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
P Inglis
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
P Watkins
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.38
1 player
E Black
2 player
A Browning
Weak Negative Correlation
0.23
1 player
E Black
2 player
K Gordon
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
E Black
2 player
B James
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
E Black
2 player
E Carson
No Correlation
-0.24
1 player
E Black
2 player
C Blakely
Weak Negative Correlation
0.08
1 player
E Black
2 player
H Jensen
No Correlation
1
1 player
E Black
2 player
E Black
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.17
1 player
E Black
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
No Correlation
-0.15
1 player
E Black
2 player
O Gain
No Correlation
0.24
1 player
E Black
2 player
P Inglis
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.4
1 player
E Black
2 player
P Watkins
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.54
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
A Browning
Negative Correlation
0.23
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
K Gordon
Weak Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
B James
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.12
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
E Carson
No Correlation
0.07
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
C Blakely
No Correlation
-0.04
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
H Jensen
No Correlation
-0.17
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
E Black
No Correlation
1
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.04
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
O Gain
No Correlation
-0.2
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
P Inglis
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
P Watkins
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
O Gain
2 player
A Browning
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.38
1 player
O Gain
2 player
K Gordon
Weak Negative Correlation
0.23
1 player
O Gain
2 player
B James
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
O Gain
2 player
E Carson
No Correlation
-0.11
1 player
O Gain
2 player
C Blakely
No Correlation
-0.18
1 player
O Gain
2 player
H Jensen
No Correlation
-0.15
1 player
O Gain
2 player
E Black
No Correlation
-0.04
1 player
O Gain
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
No Correlation
1
1 player
O Gain
2 player
O Gain
Strong Positive Correlation
0.19
1 player
O Gain
2 player
P Inglis
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
O Gain
2 player
P Watkins
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
A Browning
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
K Gordon
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.03
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
B James
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
E Carson
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.07
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
C Blakely
No Correlation
0.04
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
H Jensen
No Correlation
0.24
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
E Black
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.2
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
No Correlation
0.19
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
O Gain
No Correlation
1
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
P Inglis
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
P Watkins
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
P Watkins
2 player
A Browning
Weak Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
P Watkins
2 player
K Gordon
Positive Correlation
-1
1 player
P Watkins
2 player
B James
Strong Negative Correlation
-0.2
1 player
P Watkins
2 player
E Carson
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
P Watkins
2 player
C Blakely
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
P Watkins
2 player
H Jensen
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.4
1 player
P Watkins
2 player
E Black
Weak Negative Correlation
0.2
1 player
P Watkins
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
P Watkins
2 player
O Gain
No Correlation
0
1 player
P Watkins
2 player
P Inglis
No Correlation
1
1 player
P Watkins
2 player
P Watkins
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick K Gordon and H Jensen together
Positive Correlation

Pick K Gordon and P Watkins together
Positive Correlation

Pick B James and P Watkins together
Strong Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 E Black

AR
Similar Perfomance
P Inglis 0.24
K Gordon 0.23
B James 0.14
E Carson 0.08
H Jensen 0.08
Opposite Perfomance
P Watkins -0.4
A Browning -0.38
C Blakely -0.24
F Leydon-Davis -0.17
O Gain -0.15

2 E Carson

BOW
Similar Perfomance
P Inglis 0.28
K Gordon 0.2
H Jensen 0.08
E Black 0.08
Opposite Perfomance
C Blakely -0.2
P Watkins -0.2
A Browning -0.17
F Leydon-Davis -0.12

3 P Inglis

WK
Similar Perfomance
E Carson 0.28
E Black 0.24
A Browning 0.23
K Gordon 0.23
O Gain 0.19
H Jensen 0.04
Opposite Perfomance
F Leydon-Davis -0.2
C Blakely -0.07
B James -0.03

4 H Jensen

AR
Similar Perfomance
K Gordon 0.6
P Watkins 0.33
E Carson 0.08
E Black 0.08
C Blakely 0.04
P Inglis 0.04
Opposite Perfomance
A Browning -0.33
B James -0.25
O Gain -0.18
F Leydon-Davis -0.04

5 B James

WK
Similar Perfomance
F Leydon-Davis 0.24
O Gain 0.23
E Black 0.14
Opposite Perfomance
P Watkins -1
A Browning -0.33
K Gordon -0.33
H Jensen -0.25
C Blakely -0.03
P Inglis -0.03

More on PL Labs

CH-W vs OS-W

PerfectLineup © 2025. All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer - PerfectLineup is an educational tool providing detailed analysis of sports players based on their past performances. We are not associated with any gaming activity and do not host any kind of paid or free contests or pool games. Our focus is purely on data-driven solutions to enhance our users' knowledge.

Perfect Lineup is not affiliated in any way to and claims no association, in any capacity whatsoever, with the Residents of the states of SIKKIM, ASSAM, ODISHA, TELANGANA, NAGALAND, ANDHRA PRADESH and where otherwise prohibited by law are not eligible to access Perfect Lineup.

This platform is applicable for users 18+ Only