Upcoming
Fixtures
View All
CS 12 Jan 08:55 am OV

Lineup Out

Fitzherbert Park
New Zealand T20 Domestic

Best Player Combinations For
CS vs OV

How it Works?

This guide is super useful for identifying player combinations that are likely to score big. Use the filters to identify the best player combinations according to specific match scenarios.

Player correlate positively

Both players generally perform similarly when picked together. They either score high together or score low together. Maximise FPts by picking players that correlate positively with top players.

Player correlate negatively

Both players generally perform in an opposite manner. If one player scores high, the other usually scores low. Avoid picking players that correlate negatively with top player

More on PL Labs

CS vs OV

Show Player Combinations on the basis of:

Best CS Player Combinations

Best CS Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
A Schaw AR CS
C Heaphy WK CS
T Findlay AR CS
B Randell BOW CS
W Clark AR CS
J Lennox BOW CS
D Cleaver WK CS
T Bruce BAT CS
J Clarkson AR CS
B Tickner BOW CS
J Boyle BAT CS
A Schaw
C Heaphy
T Findlay
B Randell
W Clark
J Lennox
D Cleaver
T Bruce
J Clarkson
B Tickner
J Boyle
1
1 player
A Schaw
2 player
A Schaw
Strong Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
A Schaw
2 player
C Heaphy
No Correlation
0.62
1 player
A Schaw
2 player
T Findlay
Positive Correlation
0.01
1 player
A Schaw
2 player
B Randell
No Correlation
0.52
1 player
A Schaw
2 player
W Clark
Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
A Schaw
2 player
J Lennox
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.04
1 player
A Schaw
2 player
D Cleaver
No Correlation
0.19
1 player
A Schaw
2 player
T Bruce
No Correlation
0.45
1 player
A Schaw
2 player
J Clarkson
Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
A Schaw
2 player
B Tickner
Weak Positive Correlation
0.48
1 player
A Schaw
2 player
J Boyle
Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
C Heaphy
2 player
A Schaw
No Correlation
1
1 player
C Heaphy
2 player
C Heaphy
Strong Positive Correlation
0.45
1 player
C Heaphy
2 player
T Findlay
Positive Correlation
0.54
1 player
C Heaphy
2 player
B Randell
Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
C Heaphy
2 player
W Clark
Weak Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
C Heaphy
2 player
J Lennox
No Correlation
0.44
1 player
C Heaphy
2 player
D Cleaver
Positive Correlation
0.19
1 player
C Heaphy
2 player
T Bruce
No Correlation
0.16
1 player
C Heaphy
2 player
J Clarkson
No Correlation
0.59
1 player
C Heaphy
2 player
B Tickner
Positive Correlation
-0.07
1 player
C Heaphy
2 player
J Boyle
No Correlation
0.62
1 player
T Findlay
2 player
A Schaw
Positive Correlation
0.45
1 player
T Findlay
2 player
C Heaphy
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
T Findlay
2 player
T Findlay
Strong Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
T Findlay
2 player
B Randell
Weak Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
T Findlay
2 player
W Clark
Weak Positive Correlation
0.76
1 player
T Findlay
2 player
J Lennox
Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
T Findlay
2 player
D Cleaver
Weak Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
T Findlay
2 player
T Bruce
Weak Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
T Findlay
2 player
J Clarkson
Positive Correlation
0.46
1 player
T Findlay
2 player
B Tickner
Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
T Findlay
2 player
J Boyle
Weak Positive Correlation
0.01
1 player
B Randell
2 player
A Schaw
No Correlation
0.54
1 player
B Randell
2 player
C Heaphy
Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
B Randell
2 player
T Findlay
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
B Randell
2 player
B Randell
Strong Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
B Randell
2 player
W Clark
No Correlation
0.32
1 player
B Randell
2 player
J Lennox
Weak Positive Correlation
0.53
1 player
B Randell
2 player
D Cleaver
Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
B Randell
2 player
T Bruce
Weak Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
B Randell
2 player
J Clarkson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
B Randell
2 player
B Tickner
Weak Positive Correlation
0.04
1 player
B Randell
2 player
J Boyle
No Correlation
0.52
1 player
W Clark
2 player
A Schaw
Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
W Clark
2 player
C Heaphy
Weak Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
W Clark
2 player
T Findlay
Weak Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
W Clark
2 player
B Randell
No Correlation
1
1 player
W Clark
2 player
W Clark
Strong Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
W Clark
2 player
J Lennox
No Correlation
0.15
1 player
W Clark
2 player
D Cleaver
No Correlation
0.12
1 player
W Clark
2 player
T Bruce
No Correlation
0.48
1 player
W Clark
2 player
J Clarkson
Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
W Clark
2 player
B Tickner
No Correlation
0.18
1 player
W Clark
2 player
J Boyle
No Correlation
0.36
1 player
J Lennox
2 player
A Schaw
Weak Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
J Lennox
2 player
C Heaphy
No Correlation
0.76
1 player
J Lennox
2 player
T Findlay
Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
J Lennox
2 player
B Randell
Weak Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
J Lennox
2 player
W Clark
No Correlation
1
1 player
J Lennox
2 player
J Lennox
Strong Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
J Lennox
2 player
D Cleaver
Weak Positive Correlation
0.55
1 player
J Lennox
2 player
T Bruce
Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
J Lennox
2 player
J Clarkson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
J Lennox
2 player
B Tickner
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
J Lennox
2 player
J Boyle
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.04
1 player
D Cleaver
2 player
A Schaw
No Correlation
0.44
1 player
D Cleaver
2 player
C Heaphy
Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
D Cleaver
2 player
T Findlay
Weak Positive Correlation
0.53
1 player
D Cleaver
2 player
B Randell
Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
D Cleaver
2 player
W Clark
No Correlation
0.27
1 player
D Cleaver
2 player
J Lennox
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
D Cleaver
2 player
D Cleaver
Strong Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
D Cleaver
2 player
T Bruce
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
D Cleaver
2 player
J Clarkson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
D Cleaver
2 player
B Tickner
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
D Cleaver
2 player
J Boyle
No Correlation
0.19
1 player
T Bruce
2 player
A Schaw
No Correlation
0.19
1 player
T Bruce
2 player
C Heaphy
No Correlation
0.34
1 player
T Bruce
2 player
T Findlay
Weak Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
T Bruce
2 player
B Randell
Weak Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
T Bruce
2 player
W Clark
No Correlation
0.55
1 player
T Bruce
2 player
J Lennox
Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
T Bruce
2 player
D Cleaver
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
T Bruce
2 player
T Bruce
Strong Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
T Bruce
2 player
J Clarkson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
T Bruce
2 player
B Tickner
Weak Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
T Bruce
2 player
J Boyle
No Correlation
0.45
1 player
J Clarkson
2 player
A Schaw
Positive Correlation
0.16
1 player
J Clarkson
2 player
C Heaphy
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
J Clarkson
2 player
T Findlay
Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
J Clarkson
2 player
B Randell
Weak Positive Correlation
0.48
1 player
J Clarkson
2 player
W Clark
Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
J Clarkson
2 player
J Lennox
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
J Clarkson
2 player
D Cleaver
Weak Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
J Clarkson
2 player
T Bruce
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
J Clarkson
2 player
J Clarkson
Strong Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
J Clarkson
2 player
B Tickner
Weak Positive Correlation
0.52
1 player
J Clarkson
2 player
J Boyle
Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
B Tickner
2 player
A Schaw
Weak Positive Correlation
0.59
1 player
B Tickner
2 player
C Heaphy
Positive Correlation
0.46
1 player
B Tickner
2 player
T Findlay
Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
B Tickner
2 player
B Randell
Weak Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
B Tickner
2 player
W Clark
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
B Tickner
2 player
J Lennox
Weak Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
B Tickner
2 player
D Cleaver
No Correlation
0.3
1 player
B Tickner
2 player
T Bruce
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
B Tickner
2 player
J Clarkson
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
B Tickner
2 player
B Tickner
Strong Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
B Tickner
2 player
J Boyle
No Correlation
0.48
1 player
J Boyle
2 player
A Schaw
Positive Correlation
-0.07
1 player
J Boyle
2 player
C Heaphy
No Correlation
0.36
1 player
J Boyle
2 player
T Findlay
Weak Positive Correlation
0.04
1 player
J Boyle
2 player
B Randell
No Correlation
0.18
1 player
J Boyle
2 player
W Clark
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
J Boyle
2 player
J Lennox
Weak Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
J Boyle
2 player
D Cleaver
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
J Boyle
2 player
T Bruce
No Correlation
0.52
1 player
J Boyle
2 player
J Clarkson
Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
J Boyle
2 player
B Tickner
No Correlation
1
1 player
J Boyle
2 player
J Boyle
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick A Schaw and T Findlay together
Positive Correlation

Pick T Findlay and J Lennox together
Positive Correlation

High Performing Players

1 T Bruce

BAT
Similar Perfomance
J Lennox 0.55
T Findlay 0.34
D Cleaver 0.3
J Clarkson 0.3
B Tickner 0.3
B Randell 0.26
A Schaw 0.19
C Heaphy 0.19
W Clark 0.12
J Boyle 0.08

2 J Lennox

BOW
Similar Perfomance
T Findlay 0.76
T Bruce 0.55
A Schaw 0.36
B Tickner 0.33
B Randell 0.32
D Cleaver 0.27
J Clarkson 0.25
J Boyle 0.25
W Clark 0.12
C Heaphy 0.1

3 D Cleaver

WK
Similar Perfomance
B Randell 0.53
C Heaphy 0.44
J Clarkson 0.35
T Bruce 0.3
T Findlay 0.28
J Lennox 0.27
W Clark 0.15
J Boyle 0.11
B Tickner 0.07
Opposite Perfomance
A Schaw -0.04

4 J Clarkson

AR
Similar Perfomance
J Boyle 0.52
T Findlay 0.5
W Clark 0.48
A Schaw 0.45
D Cleaver 0.35
T Bruce 0.3
B Tickner 0.28
J Lennox 0.25
B Randell 0.22
C Heaphy 0.16

5 B Tickner

BOW
Similar Perfomance
C Heaphy 0.59
T Findlay 0.46
B Randell 0.38
J Lennox 0.33
T Bruce 0.3
J Clarkson 0.28
A Schaw 0.22
W Clark 0.18
J Boyle 0.17
D Cleaver 0.07

Best OV Player Combinations

Best OV Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
J Todd BAT OV
M Clarke BOW OV
R Clinton BAT OV
D Phillips BAT OV
L Georgeson AR OV
D Foxcroft AR OV
L Carter BAT OV
A Hazeldine BOW OV
M Bacon BOW OV
L Johnson BAT OV
B Lockrose BOW OV
J Todd
M Clarke
R Clinton
D Phillips
L Georgeson
D Foxcroft
L Carter
A Hazeldine
M Bacon
L Johnson
B Lockrose
1
1 player
J Todd
2 player
J Todd
Strong Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
J Todd
2 player
M Clarke
Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
J Todd
2 player
R Clinton
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
J Todd
2 player
D Phillips
No Correlation
0.46
1 player
J Todd
2 player
L Georgeson
Positive Correlation
-0.1
1 player
J Todd
2 player
D Foxcroft
No Correlation
0.3
1 player
J Todd
2 player
L Carter
Weak Positive Correlation
0.03
1 player
J Todd
2 player
A Hazeldine
No Correlation
0.03
1 player
J Todd
2 player
M Bacon
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
J Todd
2 player
L Johnson
No Correlation
0.07
1 player
J Todd
2 player
B Lockrose
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
M Clarke
2 player
J Todd
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M Clarke
2 player
M Clarke
Strong Positive Correlation
0.37
1 player
M Clarke
2 player
R Clinton
Weak Positive Correlation
0.54
1 player
M Clarke
2 player
D Phillips
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Clarke
2 player
L Georgeson
Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
M Clarke
2 player
D Foxcroft
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
M Clarke
2 player
L Carter
No Correlation
0.22
1 player
M Clarke
2 player
A Hazeldine
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
M Clarke
2 player
M Bacon
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.06
1 player
M Clarke
2 player
L Johnson
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
M Clarke
2 player
B Lockrose
Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
R Clinton
2 player
J Todd
Weak Positive Correlation
0.37
1 player
R Clinton
2 player
M Clarke
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
R Clinton
2 player
R Clinton
Strong Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
R Clinton
2 player
D Phillips
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.4
1 player
R Clinton
2 player
L Georgeson
Weak Negative Correlation
0.27
1 player
R Clinton
2 player
D Foxcroft
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
R Clinton
2 player
L Carter
Weak Positive Correlation
0.8
1 player
R Clinton
2 player
A Hazeldine
Strong Positive Correlation
0.6
1 player
R Clinton
2 player
M Bacon
Positive Correlation
-0.13
1 player
R Clinton
2 player
L Johnson
No Correlation
0.47
1 player
R Clinton
2 player
B Lockrose
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
D Phillips
2 player
J Todd
No Correlation
0.54
1 player
D Phillips
2 player
M Clarke
Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
D Phillips
2 player
R Clinton
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
D Phillips
2 player
D Phillips
Strong Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
D Phillips
2 player
L Georgeson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.06
1 player
D Phillips
2 player
D Foxcroft
No Correlation
0.09
1 player
D Phillips
2 player
L Carter
No Correlation
0.64
1 player
D Phillips
2 player
A Hazeldine
Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
D Phillips
2 player
M Bacon
Weak Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
D Phillips
2 player
L Johnson
Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
D Phillips
2 player
B Lockrose
Weak Positive Correlation
0.46
1 player
L Georgeson
2 player
J Todd
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
L Georgeson
2 player
M Clarke
Positive Correlation
-0.4
1 player
L Georgeson
2 player
R Clinton
Weak Negative Correlation
0.21
1 player
L Georgeson
2 player
D Phillips
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
L Georgeson
2 player
L Georgeson
Strong Positive Correlation
0.44
1 player
L Georgeson
2 player
D Foxcroft
Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
L Georgeson
2 player
L Carter
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.04
1 player
L Georgeson
2 player
A Hazeldine
No Correlation
0.16
1 player
L Georgeson
2 player
M Bacon
No Correlation
0.43
1 player
L Georgeson
2 player
L Johnson
Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
L Georgeson
2 player
B Lockrose
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.1
1 player
D Foxcroft
2 player
J Todd
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
D Foxcroft
2 player
M Clarke
No Correlation
0.27
1 player
D Foxcroft
2 player
R Clinton
Weak Positive Correlation
0.06
1 player
D Foxcroft
2 player
D Phillips
No Correlation
0.44
1 player
D Foxcroft
2 player
L Georgeson
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
D Foxcroft
2 player
D Foxcroft
Strong Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
D Foxcroft
2 player
L Carter
Weak Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
D Foxcroft
2 player
A Hazeldine
No Correlation
0.27
1 player
D Foxcroft
2 player
M Bacon
Weak Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
D Foxcroft
2 player
L Johnson
No Correlation
0.44
1 player
D Foxcroft
2 player
B Lockrose
Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
L Carter
2 player
J Todd
Weak Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
L Carter
2 player
M Clarke
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
L Carter
2 player
R Clinton
Weak Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
L Carter
2 player
D Phillips
No Correlation
0.36
1 player
L Carter
2 player
L Georgeson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
L Carter
2 player
D Foxcroft
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
L Carter
2 player
L Carter
Strong Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
L Carter
2 player
A Hazeldine
No Correlation
0.07
1 player
L Carter
2 player
M Bacon
No Correlation
0.53
1 player
L Carter
2 player
L Johnson
Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
L Carter
2 player
B Lockrose
Weak Positive Correlation
0.03
1 player
A Hazeldine
2 player
J Todd
No Correlation
0.22
1 player
A Hazeldine
2 player
M Clarke
Weak Positive Correlation
0.8
1 player
A Hazeldine
2 player
R Clinton
Strong Positive Correlation
0.64
1 player
A Hazeldine
2 player
D Phillips
Positive Correlation
-0.04
1 player
A Hazeldine
2 player
L Georgeson
No Correlation
0.1
1 player
A Hazeldine
2 player
D Foxcroft
No Correlation
0.18
1 player
A Hazeldine
2 player
L Carter
No Correlation
1
1 player
A Hazeldine
2 player
A Hazeldine
Strong Positive Correlation
0.46
1 player
A Hazeldine
2 player
M Bacon
Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
A Hazeldine
2 player
L Johnson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
A Hazeldine
2 player
B Lockrose
Weak Positive Correlation
0.03
1 player
M Bacon
2 player
J Todd
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
M Bacon
2 player
M Clarke
Weak Positive Correlation
0.6
1 player
M Bacon
2 player
R Clinton
Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
M Bacon
2 player
D Phillips
Weak Positive Correlation
0.16
1 player
M Bacon
2 player
L Georgeson
No Correlation
0.27
1 player
M Bacon
2 player
D Foxcroft
Weak Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
M Bacon
2 player
L Carter
No Correlation
0.46
1 player
M Bacon
2 player
A Hazeldine
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M Bacon
2 player
M Bacon
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
M Bacon
2 player
L Johnson
No Correlation
0.43
1 player
M Bacon
2 player
B Lockrose
Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
L Johnson
2 player
J Todd
No Correlation
-0.06
1 player
L Johnson
2 player
M Clarke
No Correlation
-0.13
1 player
L Johnson
2 player
R Clinton
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
L Johnson
2 player
D Phillips
Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
L Johnson
2 player
L Georgeson
Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
L Johnson
2 player
D Foxcroft
No Correlation
0.53
1 player
L Johnson
2 player
L Carter
Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
L Johnson
2 player
A Hazeldine
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
L Johnson
2 player
M Bacon
No Correlation
1
1 player
L Johnson
2 player
L Johnson
Strong Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
L Johnson
2 player
B Lockrose
Weak Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
B Lockrose
2 player
J Todd
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
B Lockrose
2 player
M Clarke
Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
B Lockrose
2 player
R Clinton
Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
B Lockrose
2 player
D Phillips
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
B Lockrose
2 player
L Georgeson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.44
1 player
B Lockrose
2 player
D Foxcroft
Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
B Lockrose
2 player
L Carter
Weak Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
B Lockrose
2 player
A Hazeldine
Weak Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
B Lockrose
2 player
M Bacon
Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
B Lockrose
2 player
L Johnson
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
B Lockrose
2 player
B Lockrose
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick M Clarke and L Georgeson together
Positive Correlation

Pick R Clinton and A Hazeldine together
Strong Positive Correlation

Pick R Clinton and M Bacon together
Positive Correlation

Pick D Phillips and A Hazeldine together
Positive Correlation

High Performing Players

1 D Foxcroft

AR
Similar Perfomance
B Lockrose 0.44
L Georgeson 0.44
L Carter 0.35
R Clinton 0.27
M Bacon 0.27
M Clarke 0.14
A Hazeldine 0.1
L Johnson 0.07
D Phillips 0.06
Opposite Perfomance
J Todd -0.1

2 B Lockrose

BOW
Similar Perfomance
M Clarke 0.5
R Clinton 0.47
D Foxcroft 0.44
M Bacon 0.43
D Phillips 0.36
L Johnson 0.34
A Hazeldine 0.32
L Carter 0.25
L Georgeson 0.23
J Todd 0.07

3 M Bacon

BOW
Similar Perfomance
R Clinton 0.6
A Hazeldine 0.46
B Lockrose 0.43
D Foxcroft 0.27
D Phillips 0.26
M Clarke 0.2
L Georgeson 0.16
L Carter 0.07
J Todd 0.03

4 A Hazeldine

BOW
Similar Perfomance
R Clinton 0.8
D Phillips 0.64
M Bacon 0.46
L Johnson 0.33
B Lockrose 0.32
M Clarke 0.22
L Carter 0.18
D Foxcroft 0.1
J Todd 0.03
Opposite Perfomance
L Georgeson -0.04

5 D Phillips

BAT
Similar Perfomance
A Hazeldine 0.64
M Clarke 0.54
L Johnson 0.4
B Lockrose 0.36
R Clinton 0.27
M Bacon 0.26
L Georgeson 0.21
L Carter 0.09
D Foxcroft 0.06

Best CS Player Combinations

Best CS Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
A Schaw AR CS
C Heaphy WK CS
T Findlay AR CS
B Randell BOW CS
W Clark AR CS
J Lennox BOW CS
D Cleaver WK CS
T Bruce BAT CS
J Clarkson AR CS
B Tickner BOW CS
J Boyle BAT CS
A Schaw
C Heaphy
T Findlay
B Randell
W Clark
J Lennox
D Cleaver
T Bruce
J Clarkson
B Tickner
J Boyle
1
1 player
A Schaw
2 player
A Schaw
Strong Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
A Schaw
2 player
C Heaphy
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
A Schaw
2 player
T Findlay
No Correlation
-0.75
1 player
A Schaw
2 player
B Randell
Negative Correlation
0.25
1 player
A Schaw
2 player
W Clark
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
A Schaw
2 player
J Lennox
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.43
1 player
A Schaw
2 player
D Cleaver
Negative Correlation
0.5
1 player
A Schaw
2 player
T Bruce
Positive Correlation
-0.67
1 player
A Schaw
2 player
J Clarkson
Negative Correlation
0.43
1 player
A Schaw
2 player
B Tickner
Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
A Schaw
2 player
J Boyle
Weak Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
C Heaphy
2 player
A Schaw
No Correlation
1
1 player
C Heaphy
2 player
C Heaphy
Strong Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
C Heaphy
2 player
T Findlay
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
C Heaphy
2 player
B Randell
No Correlation
-0.2
1 player
C Heaphy
2 player
W Clark
No Correlation
-0.4
1 player
C Heaphy
2 player
J Lennox
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.11
1 player
C Heaphy
2 player
D Cleaver
No Correlation
-0.11
1 player
C Heaphy
2 player
T Bruce
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
C Heaphy
2 player
J Clarkson
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
C Heaphy
2 player
B Tickner
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
C Heaphy
2 player
J Boyle
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
T Findlay
2 player
A Schaw
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
T Findlay
2 player
C Heaphy
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
T Findlay
2 player
T Findlay
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
T Findlay
2 player
B Randell
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
T Findlay
2 player
W Clark
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
T Findlay
2 player
J Lennox
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
T Findlay
2 player
D Cleaver
Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
T Findlay
2 player
T Bruce
No Correlation
-0.35
1 player
T Findlay
2 player
J Clarkson
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
T Findlay
2 player
B Tickner
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
T Findlay
2 player
J Boyle
Positive Correlation
-0.75
1 player
B Randell
2 player
A Schaw
Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
B Randell
2 player
C Heaphy
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
B Randell
2 player
T Findlay
No Correlation
1
1 player
B Randell
2 player
B Randell
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.17
1 player
B Randell
2 player
W Clark
No Correlation
-0.29
1 player
B Randell
2 player
J Lennox
Weak Negative Correlation
0.17
1 player
B Randell
2 player
D Cleaver
No Correlation
-0.12
1 player
B Randell
2 player
T Bruce
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
B Randell
2 player
J Clarkson
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
B Randell
2 player
B Tickner
No Correlation
0
1 player
B Randell
2 player
J Boyle
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
W Clark
2 player
A Schaw
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.2
1 player
W Clark
2 player
C Heaphy
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
W Clark
2 player
T Findlay
No Correlation
-0.17
1 player
W Clark
2 player
B Randell
No Correlation
1
1 player
W Clark
2 player
W Clark
Strong Positive Correlation
0.05
1 player
W Clark
2 player
J Lennox
No Correlation
-0.06
1 player
W Clark
2 player
D Cleaver
No Correlation
-0.37
1 player
W Clark
2 player
T Bruce
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.07
1 player
W Clark
2 player
J Clarkson
No Correlation
0
1 player
W Clark
2 player
B Tickner
No Correlation
-0.17
1 player
W Clark
2 player
J Boyle
No Correlation
-0.25
1 player
J Lennox
2 player
A Schaw
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.4
1 player
J Lennox
2 player
C Heaphy
Weak Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
J Lennox
2 player
T Findlay
No Correlation
-0.29
1 player
J Lennox
2 player
B Randell
Weak Negative Correlation
0.05
1 player
J Lennox
2 player
W Clark
No Correlation
1
1 player
J Lennox
2 player
J Lennox
Strong Positive Correlation
0.04
1 player
J Lennox
2 player
D Cleaver
No Correlation
0
1 player
J Lennox
2 player
T Bruce
No Correlation
-0.18
1 player
J Lennox
2 player
J Clarkson
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
J Lennox
2 player
B Tickner
No Correlation
0.17
1 player
J Lennox
2 player
J Boyle
No Correlation
-0.43
1 player
D Cleaver
2 player
A Schaw
Negative Correlation
-0.11
1 player
D Cleaver
2 player
C Heaphy
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
D Cleaver
2 player
T Findlay
Negative Correlation
0.17
1 player
D Cleaver
2 player
B Randell
No Correlation
-0.06
1 player
D Cleaver
2 player
W Clark
No Correlation
0.04
1 player
D Cleaver
2 player
J Lennox
No Correlation
1
1 player
D Cleaver
2 player
D Cleaver
Strong Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
D Cleaver
2 player
T Bruce
No Correlation
0.26
1 player
D Cleaver
2 player
J Clarkson
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
D Cleaver
2 player
B Tickner
No Correlation
-0.27
1 player
D Cleaver
2 player
J Boyle
Weak Negative Correlation
0.5
1 player
T Bruce
2 player
A Schaw
Positive Correlation
-0.11
1 player
T Bruce
2 player
C Heaphy
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
T Bruce
2 player
T Findlay
No Correlation
-0.12
1 player
T Bruce
2 player
B Randell
No Correlation
-0.37
1 player
T Bruce
2 player
W Clark
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
T Bruce
2 player
J Lennox
No Correlation
0.09
1 player
T Bruce
2 player
D Cleaver
No Correlation
1
1 player
T Bruce
2 player
T Bruce
Strong Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
T Bruce
2 player
J Clarkson
No Correlation
0.26
1 player
T Bruce
2 player
B Tickner
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.27
1 player
T Bruce
2 player
J Boyle
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.67
1 player
J Clarkson
2 player
A Schaw
Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
J Clarkson
2 player
C Heaphy
No Correlation
-0.35
1 player
J Clarkson
2 player
T Findlay
Weak Negative Correlation
0.2
1 player
J Clarkson
2 player
B Randell
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.07
1 player
J Clarkson
2 player
W Clark
No Correlation
-0.18
1 player
J Clarkson
2 player
J Lennox
No Correlation
0.26
1 player
J Clarkson
2 player
D Cleaver
Weak Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
J Clarkson
2 player
T Bruce
No Correlation
1
1 player
J Clarkson
2 player
J Clarkson
Strong Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
J Clarkson
2 player
B Tickner
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
J Clarkson
2 player
J Boyle
Weak Negative Correlation
0.43
1 player
B Tickner
2 player
A Schaw
Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
B Tickner
2 player
C Heaphy
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
B Tickner
2 player
T Findlay
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
B Tickner
2 player
B Randell
No Correlation
0
1 player
B Tickner
2 player
W Clark
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
B Tickner
2 player
J Lennox
No Correlation
0
1 player
B Tickner
2 player
D Cleaver
No Correlation
0.26
1 player
B Tickner
2 player
T Bruce
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
B Tickner
2 player
J Clarkson
No Correlation
1
1 player
B Tickner
2 player
B Tickner
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.09
1 player
B Tickner
2 player
J Boyle
No Correlation
-0.25
1 player
J Boyle
2 player
A Schaw
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
J Boyle
2 player
C Heaphy
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
J Boyle
2 player
T Findlay
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
J Boyle
2 player
B Randell
No Correlation
-0.17
1 player
J Boyle
2 player
W Clark
No Correlation
0.17
1 player
J Boyle
2 player
J Lennox
No Correlation
-0.27
1 player
J Boyle
2 player
D Cleaver
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.27
1 player
J Boyle
2 player
T Bruce
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
J Boyle
2 player
J Clarkson
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.09
1 player
J Boyle
2 player
B Tickner
No Correlation
1
1 player
J Boyle
2 player
J Boyle
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

No data found

Pick A Schaw and B Randell together
Negative Correlation

Pick A Schaw and J Clarkson together
Negative Correlation

Pick T Findlay and D Cleaver together
Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 T Bruce

BAT
Similar Perfomance
A Schaw 0.5
B Tickner 0.26
J Clarkson 0.13
D Cleaver 0.09
Opposite Perfomance
W Clark -0.37
J Boyle -0.27
T Findlay -0.14
B Randell -0.12
C Heaphy -0.11

2 J Lennox

BOW
Similar Perfomance
J Boyle 0.17
T Findlay 0.14
B Tickner 0.11
W Clark 0.05
D Cleaver 0.04
Opposite Perfomance
C Heaphy -0.4
B Randell -0.29
A Schaw -0.25
J Clarkson -0.18

3 D Cleaver

WK
Similar Perfomance
J Clarkson 0.26
B Randell 0.17
T Bruce 0.09
J Lennox 0.04
Opposite Perfomance
T Findlay -0.7
A Schaw -0.43
J Boyle -0.27
C Heaphy -0.11
W Clark -0.06

4 J Clarkson

AR
Similar Perfomance
D Cleaver 0.26
B Randell 0.2
C Heaphy 0.14
B Tickner 0.14
T Bruce 0.13
Opposite Perfomance
A Schaw -0.67
T Findlay -0.35
J Boyle -0.33
J Lennox -0.18
W Clark -0.07

5 B Randell

BOW
Similar Perfomance
J Clarkson 0.2
D Cleaver 0.17
C Heaphy 0.14
Opposite Perfomance
A Schaw -0.75
J Lennox -0.29
W Clark -0.17
T Findlay -0.14
B Tickner -0.14
T Bruce -0.12

Best OV Player Combinations

Best OV Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
J Todd BAT OV
M Clarke BOW OV
R Clinton BAT OV
D Phillips BAT OV
L Georgeson AR OV
D Foxcroft AR OV
L Carter BAT OV
A Hazeldine BOW OV
M Bacon BOW OV
L Johnson BAT OV
B Lockrose BOW OV
J Todd
M Clarke
R Clinton
D Phillips
L Georgeson
D Foxcroft
L Carter
A Hazeldine
M Bacon
L Johnson
B Lockrose
1
1 player
J Todd
2 player
J Todd
Strong Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
J Todd
2 player
M Clarke
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
J Todd
2 player
R Clinton
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.2
1 player
J Todd
2 player
D Phillips
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
J Todd
2 player
L Georgeson
No Correlation
-0.2
1 player
J Todd
2 player
D Foxcroft
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
J Todd
2 player
L Carter
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.17
1 player
J Todd
2 player
A Hazeldine
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
J Todd
2 player
M Bacon
No Correlation
-0.2
1 player
J Todd
2 player
L Johnson
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
J Todd
2 player
B Lockrose
Weak Negative Correlation
0.35
1 player
M Clarke
2 player
J Todd
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M Clarke
2 player
M Clarke
Strong Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
M Clarke
2 player
R Clinton
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
M Clarke
2 player
D Phillips
Weak Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Clarke
2 player
L Georgeson
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
M Clarke
2 player
D Foxcroft
No Correlation
-0.35
1 player
M Clarke
2 player
L Carter
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
M Clarke
2 player
A Hazeldine
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
M Clarke
2 player
M Bacon
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
M Clarke
2 player
L Johnson
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
M Clarke
2 player
B Lockrose
No Correlation
-0.23
1 player
R Clinton
2 player
J Todd
Weak Negative Correlation
0.23
1 player
R Clinton
2 player
M Clarke
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
R Clinton
2 player
R Clinton
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
R Clinton
2 player
D Phillips
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
R Clinton
2 player
L Georgeson
Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
R Clinton
2 player
D Foxcroft
Weak Negative Correlation
0.23
1 player
R Clinton
2 player
L Carter
Weak Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
R Clinton
2 player
A Hazeldine
Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
R Clinton
2 player
M Bacon
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
R Clinton
2 player
L Johnson
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
R Clinton
2 player
B Lockrose
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.2
1 player
D Phillips
2 player
J Todd
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
D Phillips
2 player
M Clarke
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
D Phillips
2 player
R Clinton
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
D Phillips
2 player
D Phillips
Strong Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
D Phillips
2 player
L Georgeson
No Correlation
-0.3
1 player
D Phillips
2 player
D Foxcroft
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.82
1 player
D Phillips
2 player
L Carter
Strong Negative Correlation
0.4
1 player
D Phillips
2 player
A Hazeldine
Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
D Phillips
2 player
M Bacon
No Correlation
0.04
1 player
D Phillips
2 player
L Johnson
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
D Phillips
2 player
B Lockrose
Weak Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
L Georgeson
2 player
J Todd
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
L Georgeson
2 player
M Clarke
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
L Georgeson
2 player
R Clinton
Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
L Georgeson
2 player
D Phillips
No Correlation
1
1 player
L Georgeson
2 player
L Georgeson
Strong Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
L Georgeson
2 player
D Foxcroft
Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
L Georgeson
2 player
L Carter
No Correlation
-0.11
1 player
L Georgeson
2 player
A Hazeldine
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
L Georgeson
2 player
M Bacon
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
L Georgeson
2 player
L Johnson
No Correlation
-0.11
1 player
L Georgeson
2 player
B Lockrose
No Correlation
-0.2
1 player
D Foxcroft
2 player
J Todd
No Correlation
0
1 player
D Foxcroft
2 player
M Clarke
No Correlation
-0.23
1 player
D Foxcroft
2 player
R Clinton
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.3
1 player
D Foxcroft
2 player
D Phillips
Weak Negative Correlation
0.43
1 player
D Foxcroft
2 player
L Georgeson
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
D Foxcroft
2 player
D Foxcroft
Strong Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
D Foxcroft
2 player
L Carter
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
D Foxcroft
2 player
A Hazeldine
No Correlation
0
1 player
D Foxcroft
2 player
M Bacon
No Correlation
-0.15
1 player
D Foxcroft
2 player
L Johnson
No Correlation
0.36
1 player
D Foxcroft
2 player
B Lockrose
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
L Carter
2 player
J Todd
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
L Carter
2 player
M Clarke
Weak Negative Correlation
0.23
1 player
L Carter
2 player
R Clinton
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.82
1 player
L Carter
2 player
D Phillips
Strong Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
L Carter
2 player
L Georgeson
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
L Carter
2 player
D Foxcroft
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
L Carter
2 player
L Carter
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
L Carter
2 player
A Hazeldine
No Correlation
-0.2
1 player
L Carter
2 player
M Bacon
No Correlation
0.17
1 player
L Carter
2 player
L Johnson
No Correlation
-0.5
1 player
L Carter
2 player
B Lockrose
Negative Correlation
-0.17
1 player
A Hazeldine
2 player
J Todd
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Hazeldine
2 player
M Clarke
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
A Hazeldine
2 player
R Clinton
Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
A Hazeldine
2 player
D Phillips
Positive Correlation
-0.11
1 player
A Hazeldine
2 player
L Georgeson
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
A Hazeldine
2 player
D Foxcroft
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Hazeldine
2 player
L Carter
No Correlation
1
1 player
A Hazeldine
2 player
A Hazeldine
Strong Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
A Hazeldine
2 player
M Bacon
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
A Hazeldine
2 player
L Johnson
No Correlation
0.04
1 player
A Hazeldine
2 player
B Lockrose
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
M Bacon
2 player
J Todd
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
M Bacon
2 player
M Clarke
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
M Bacon
2 player
R Clinton
Weak Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
M Bacon
2 player
D Phillips
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
M Bacon
2 player
L Georgeson
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
M Bacon
2 player
D Foxcroft
No Correlation
-0.2
1 player
M Bacon
2 player
L Carter
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
M Bacon
2 player
A Hazeldine
No Correlation
1
1 player
M Bacon
2 player
M Bacon
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.62
1 player
M Bacon
2 player
L Johnson
Negative Correlation
-0.05
1 player
M Bacon
2 player
B Lockrose
No Correlation
-0.2
1 player
L Johnson
2 player
J Todd
No Correlation
-0.35
1 player
L Johnson
2 player
M Clarke
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
L Johnson
2 player
R Clinton
Weak Negative Correlation
0.04
1 player
L Johnson
2 player
D Phillips
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
L Johnson
2 player
L Georgeson
No Correlation
-0.15
1 player
L Johnson
2 player
D Foxcroft
No Correlation
0.17
1 player
L Johnson
2 player
L Carter
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
L Johnson
2 player
A Hazeldine
No Correlation
-0.62
1 player
L Johnson
2 player
M Bacon
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
L Johnson
2 player
L Johnson
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
L Johnson
2 player
B Lockrose
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
B Lockrose
2 player
J Todd
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
B Lockrose
2 player
M Clarke
No Correlation
-0.23
1 player
B Lockrose
2 player
R Clinton
Weak Negative Correlation
0.2
1 player
B Lockrose
2 player
D Phillips
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.11
1 player
B Lockrose
2 player
L Georgeson
No Correlation
0.36
1 player
B Lockrose
2 player
D Foxcroft
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.5
1 player
B Lockrose
2 player
L Carter
Negative Correlation
0.04
1 player
B Lockrose
2 player
A Hazeldine
No Correlation
-0.05
1 player
B Lockrose
2 player
M Bacon
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
B Lockrose
2 player
L Johnson
No Correlation
1
1 player
B Lockrose
2 player
B Lockrose
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

No data found

Pick R Clinton and L Georgeson together
Negative Correlation

Pick D Phillips and L Carter together
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick M Bacon and L Johnson together
Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 B Lockrose

BOW
Similar Perfomance
D Foxcroft 0.36
D Phillips 0.2
A Hazeldine 0.04
Opposite Perfomance
L Carter -0.5
J Todd -0.33
R Clinton -0.23
L Johnson -0.14
L Georgeson -0.11
M Bacon -0.05

2 D Foxcroft

AR
Similar Perfomance
L Georgeson 0.43
B Lockrose 0.36
L Carter 0.2
Opposite Perfomance
D Phillips -0.3
R Clinton -0.23
J Todd -0.2
L Johnson -0.15
A Hazeldine -0.14

3 M Bacon

BOW
Similar Perfomance
M Clarke 0.35
L Georgeson 0.33
R Clinton 0.23
A Hazeldine 0.14
J Todd 0.11
D Phillips 0.11
Opposite Perfomance
L Johnson -0.62
L Carter -0.2
B Lockrose -0.05

4 A Hazeldine

BOW
Similar Perfomance
R Clinton 0.7
D Phillips 0.4
M Bacon 0.14
B Lockrose 0.04
Opposite Perfomance
J Todd -0.17
D Foxcroft -0.14
L Johnson -0.14
L Georgeson -0.11

5 D Phillips

BAT
Similar Perfomance
A Hazeldine 0.4
M Clarke 0.35
B Lockrose 0.2
L Georgeson 0.14
M Bacon 0.11
L Johnson 0.04
Opposite Perfomance
L Carter -0.82
D Foxcroft -0.3
R Clinton -0.23
J Todd -0.2

More on PL Labs

CS vs OV

PerfectLineup © 2025. All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer - PerfectLineup is an educational tool providing detailed analysis of sports players based on their past performances. We are not associated with any gaming activity and do not host any kind of paid or free contests or pool games. Our focus is purely on data-driven solutions to enhance our users' knowledge.

Perfect Lineup is not affiliated in any way to and claims no association, in any capacity whatsoever, with the Residents of the states of SIKKIM, ASSAM, ODISHA, TELANGANA, NAGALAND, ANDHRA PRADESH and where otherwise prohibited by law are not eligible to access Perfect Lineup.

This platform is applicable for users 18+ Only