DUR vs DER

This guide is super useful for identifying player combinations that are likely to score big. Use the filters to identify the best player combinations according to specific match scenarios.

Both players generally perform similarly when picked together. They either score high together or score low together. Maximise FPts by picking players that correlate positively with top players.

Both players generally perform in an opposite manner. If one player scores high, the other usually scores low. Avoid picking players that correlate negatively with top player

Show Player Combinations on the basis of:

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

J Bushnell AR DUR

H Mustard WK DUR

B de Leede AR DUR

M Jones BAT DUR

S Borthwick AR DUR

A Lees BAT DUR

B Raine AR DUR

G Drissell BOW DUR

C Parkinson BOW DUR

C Ackermann AR DUR

J Bushnell

H Mustard

B de Leede

M Jones

S Borthwick

A Lees

B Raine

G Drissell

C Parkinson

C Ackermann

1

1 player

J Bushnell

2 player

J Bushnell

Strong Positive Correlation

0.7

1 player

J Bushnell

2 player

H Mustard

Positive Correlation

0.55

1 player

J Bushnell

2 player

B de Leede

Positive Correlation

0.22

1 player

J Bushnell

2 player

M Jones

Weak Positive Correlation

0

1 player

J Bushnell

2 player

S Borthwick

No Correlation

0.26

1 player

J Bushnell

2 player

A Lees

Weak Positive Correlation

0.42

1 player

J Bushnell

2 player

G Drissell

Positive Correlation

0

1 player

J Bushnell

2 player

C Ackermann

No Correlation

0.7

1 player

H Mustard

2 player

J Bushnell

Positive Correlation

1

1 player

H Mustard

2 player

H Mustard

Strong Positive Correlation

0.4

1 player

H Mustard

2 player

B de Leede

Positive Correlation

1

1 player

H Mustard

2 player

M Jones

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.4

1 player

H Mustard

2 player

S Borthwick

Weak Negative Correlation

0.7

1 player

H Mustard

2 player

A Lees

Positive Correlation

0.4

1 player

H Mustard

2 player

G Drissell

Positive Correlation

0.4

1 player

H Mustard

2 player

C Ackermann

Positive Correlation

0.55

1 player

B de Leede

2 player

J Bushnell

Positive Correlation

0.4

1 player

B de Leede

2 player

H Mustard

Positive Correlation

1

1 player

B de Leede

2 player

B de Leede

Strong Positive Correlation

0.4

1 player

B de Leede

2 player

M Jones

Positive Correlation

0

1 player

B de Leede

2 player

S Borthwick

No Correlation

0.35

1 player

B de Leede

2 player

A Lees

Weak Positive Correlation

0.7

1 player

B de Leede

2 player

G Drissell

Positive Correlation

-0.4

1 player

B de Leede

2 player

C Ackermann

Weak Negative Correlation

0.22

1 player

M Jones

2 player

J Bushnell

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

M Jones

2 player

H Mustard

Strong Positive Correlation

0.4

1 player

M Jones

2 player

B de Leede

Positive Correlation

1

1 player

M Jones

2 player

M Jones

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.01

1 player

M Jones

2 player

S Borthwick

No Correlation

0.33

1 player

M Jones

2 player

A Lees

Weak Positive Correlation

0.39

1 player

M Jones

2 player

G Drissell

Weak Positive Correlation

0.4

1 player

M Jones

2 player

C Ackermann

Positive Correlation

0

1 player

S Borthwick

2 player

J Bushnell

No Correlation

-0.4

1 player

S Borthwick

2 player

H Mustard

Weak Negative Correlation

0

1 player

S Borthwick

2 player

B de Leede

No Correlation

-0.01

1 player

S Borthwick

2 player

M Jones

No Correlation

1

1 player

S Borthwick

2 player

S Borthwick

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.02

1 player

S Borthwick

2 player

A Lees

No Correlation

0.05

1 player

S Borthwick

2 player

G Drissell

No Correlation

0.4

1 player

S Borthwick

2 player

C Ackermann

Positive Correlation

0.26

1 player

A Lees

2 player

J Bushnell

Weak Positive Correlation

0.7

1 player

A Lees

2 player

H Mustard

Positive Correlation

0.35

1 player

A Lees

2 player

B de Leede

Weak Positive Correlation

0.33

1 player

A Lees

2 player

M Jones

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.02

1 player

A Lees

2 player

S Borthwick

No Correlation

1

1 player

A Lees

2 player

A Lees

Strong Positive Correlation

0.44

1 player

A Lees

2 player

G Drissell

Positive Correlation

0

1 player

A Lees

2 player

C Ackermann

No Correlation

0.42

1 player

G Drissell

2 player

J Bushnell

Positive Correlation

0.4

1 player

G Drissell

2 player

H Mustard

Positive Correlation

0.7

1 player

G Drissell

2 player

B de Leede

Positive Correlation

0.39

1 player

G Drissell

2 player

M Jones

Weak Positive Correlation

0.05

1 player

G Drissell

2 player

S Borthwick

No Correlation

0.44

1 player

G Drissell

2 player

A Lees

Positive Correlation

1

1 player

G Drissell

2 player

G Drissell

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.4

1 player

G Drissell

2 player

C Ackermann

Weak Negative Correlation

0

1 player

C Ackermann

2 player

J Bushnell

No Correlation

0.4

1 player

C Ackermann

2 player

H Mustard

Positive Correlation

-0.4

1 player

C Ackermann

2 player

B de Leede

Weak Negative Correlation

0.4

1 player

C Ackermann

2 player

M Jones

Positive Correlation

0.4

1 player

C Ackermann

2 player

S Borthwick

Positive Correlation

0

1 player

C Ackermann

2 player

A Lees

No Correlation

-0.4

1 player

C Ackermann

2 player

G Drissell

Weak Negative Correlation

1

1 player

C Ackermann

2 player

C Ackermann

Strong Positive Correlation

Strong Positive Correlation

No Correlation

Strong Negative Correlation

Pick **J Bushnell** and **H Mustard** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **H Mustard** and **M Jones** together

Strong Positive Correlation

Pick **H Mustard** and **A Lees** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **B de Leede** and **G Drissell** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **S Borthwick** and **C Parkinson** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **B Raine** and **C Parkinson** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **C Parkinson** and **C Ackermann** together

Positive Correlation

Don’t Pick **J Bushnell** and **B Raine** together

Negative Correlation

Don’t Pick **B de Leede** and **B Raine** together

Strong Negative Correlation

Don’t Pick **B de Leede** and **C Parkinson** together

Negative Correlation

Don’t Pick **B Raine** and **G Drissell** together

Strong Negative Correlation

Don’t Pick **G Drissell** and **C Parkinson** together

Negative Correlation

Similar Perfomance

H Mustard 0.7

G Drissell 0.44

B de Leede 0.35

M Jones 0.33

J Bushnell 0.26

Opposite Perfomance

S Borthwick -0.02

Similar Perfomance

C Ackermann 0.4

G Drissell 0.05

Opposite Perfomance

H Mustard -0.4

A Lees -0.02

M Jones -0.01

Similar Perfomance

B de Leede 0.7

A Lees 0.44

J Bushnell 0.42

H Mustard 0.4

M Jones 0.39

S Borthwick 0.05

Opposite Perfomance

C Ackermann -0.4

Similar Perfomance

H Mustard 0.7

B de Leede 0.55

G Drissell 0.42

A Lees 0.26

M Jones 0.22

Opposite Perfomance

Similar Perfomance

H Mustard 1

B de Leede 0.4

C Ackermann 0.4

G Drissell 0.39

A Lees 0.33

J Bushnell 0.22

Opposite Perfomance

S Borthwick -0.01

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

No data found

No data found

No data found

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

J Bushnell AR DUR

H Mustard WK DUR

B de Leede AR DUR

M Jones BAT DUR

S Borthwick AR DUR

A Lees BAT DUR

B Raine AR DUR

G Drissell BOW DUR

C Parkinson BOW DUR

C Ackermann AR DUR

J Bushnell

H Mustard

B de Leede

M Jones

S Borthwick

A Lees

B Raine

G Drissell

C Parkinson

C Ackermann

1

1 player

J Bushnell

2 player

J Bushnell

Strong Positive Correlation

0.7

1 player

J Bushnell

2 player

H Mustard

Positive Correlation

0.7

1 player

J Bushnell

2 player

B de Leede

Positive Correlation

-0.11

1 player

J Bushnell

2 player

M Jones

No Correlation

-0.11

1 player

J Bushnell

2 player

S Borthwick

No Correlation

0.25

1 player

J Bushnell

2 player

A Lees

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.2

1 player

J Bushnell

2 player

G Drissell

No Correlation

-0.7

1 player

J Bushnell

2 player

C Ackermann

Negative Correlation

0.7

1 player

H Mustard

2 player

J Bushnell

Positive Correlation

1

1 player

H Mustard

2 player

H Mustard

Strong Positive Correlation

0.7

1 player

H Mustard

2 player

B de Leede

Positive Correlation

0.7

1 player

H Mustard

2 player

M Jones

Positive Correlation

-0.7

1 player

H Mustard

2 player

S Borthwick

Negative Correlation

0.7

1 player

H Mustard

2 player

A Lees

Positive Correlation

0.7

1 player

H Mustard

2 player

G Drissell

Positive Correlation

-0.7

1 player

H Mustard

2 player

C Ackermann

Negative Correlation

0.7

1 player

B de Leede

2 player

J Bushnell

Positive Correlation

0.7

1 player

B de Leede

2 player

H Mustard

Positive Correlation

1

1 player

B de Leede

2 player

B de Leede

Strong Positive Correlation

0.7

1 player

B de Leede

2 player

M Jones

Positive Correlation

0

1 player

B de Leede

2 player

S Borthwick

No Correlation

0

1 player

B de Leede

2 player

A Lees

No Correlation

0

1 player

B de Leede

2 player

G Drissell

No Correlation

-0.7

1 player

B de Leede

2 player

C Ackermann

Negative Correlation

-0.11

1 player

M Jones

2 player

J Bushnell

No Correlation

0.7

1 player

M Jones

2 player

H Mustard

Positive Correlation

0.7

1 player

M Jones

2 player

B de Leede

Positive Correlation

1

1 player

M Jones

2 player

M Jones

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.11

1 player

M Jones

2 player

S Borthwick

No Correlation

0.4

1 player

M Jones

2 player

A Lees

Positive Correlation

0.33

1 player

M Jones

2 player

G Drissell

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.7

1 player

M Jones

2 player

C Ackermann

Negative Correlation

-0.11

1 player

S Borthwick

2 player

J Bushnell

No Correlation

-0.7

1 player

S Borthwick

2 player

H Mustard

Negative Correlation

0

1 player

S Borthwick

2 player

B de Leede

No Correlation

-0.11

1 player

S Borthwick

2 player

M Jones

No Correlation

1

1 player

S Borthwick

2 player

S Borthwick

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.41

1 player

S Borthwick

2 player

A Lees

Negative Correlation

-0.6

1 player

S Borthwick

2 player

G Drissell

Negative Correlation

0.7

1 player

S Borthwick

2 player

C Ackermann

Positive Correlation

0.25

1 player

A Lees

2 player

J Bushnell

Weak Positive Correlation

0.7

1 player

A Lees

2 player

H Mustard

Positive Correlation

0

1 player

A Lees

2 player

B de Leede

No Correlation

0.4

1 player

A Lees

2 player

M Jones

Positive Correlation

-0.41

1 player

A Lees

2 player

S Borthwick

Negative Correlation

1

1 player

A Lees

2 player

A Lees

Strong Positive Correlation

0.5

1 player

A Lees

2 player

G Drissell

Positive Correlation

-0.7

1 player

A Lees

2 player

C Ackermann

Negative Correlation

-0.2

1 player

G Drissell

2 player

J Bushnell

No Correlation

0.7

1 player

G Drissell

2 player

H Mustard

Positive Correlation

0

1 player

G Drissell

2 player

B de Leede

No Correlation

0.33

1 player

G Drissell

2 player

M Jones

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.6

1 player

G Drissell

2 player

S Borthwick

Negative Correlation

0.5

1 player

G Drissell

2 player

A Lees

Positive Correlation

1

1 player

G Drissell

2 player

G Drissell

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.7

1 player

G Drissell

2 player

C Ackermann

Negative Correlation

-0.7

1 player

C Ackermann

2 player

J Bushnell

Negative Correlation

-0.7

1 player

C Ackermann

2 player

H Mustard

Negative Correlation

-0.7

1 player

C Ackermann

2 player

B de Leede

Negative Correlation

-0.7

1 player

C Ackermann

2 player

M Jones

Negative Correlation

0.7

1 player

C Ackermann

2 player

S Borthwick

Positive Correlation

-0.7

1 player

C Ackermann

2 player

A Lees

Negative Correlation

-0.7

1 player

C Ackermann

2 player

G Drissell

Negative Correlation

1

1 player

C Ackermann

2 player

C Ackermann

Strong Positive Correlation

Strong Positive Correlation

No Correlation

Strong Negative Correlation

Pick **J Bushnell** and **B de Leede** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **H Mustard** and **B de Leede** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **H Mustard** and **G Drissell** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **B de Leede** and **M Jones** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **S Borthwick** and **C Ackermann** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **B Raine** and **C Ackermann** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **J Bushnell** and **C Parkinson** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **J Bushnell** and **C Ackermann** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **H Mustard** and **S Borthwick** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **H Mustard** and **B Raine** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **H Mustard** and **C Parkinson** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **H Mustard** and **C Ackermann** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **B de Leede** and **C Ackermann** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **M Jones** and **B Raine** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **M Jones** and **C Parkinson** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **M Jones** and **C Ackermann** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **S Borthwick** and **G Drissell** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **A Lees** and **B Raine** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **A Lees** and **C Parkinson** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **A Lees** and **C Ackermann** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **G Drissell** and **C Ackermann** together

Negative Correlation

Similar Perfomance

H Mustard 0.7

G Drissell 0.5

M Jones 0.4

J Bushnell 0.25

Opposite Perfomance

C Ackermann -0.7

S Borthwick -0.41

Similar Perfomance

C Ackermann 0.7

Opposite Perfomance

H Mustard -0.7

G Drissell -0.6

A Lees -0.41

J Bushnell -0.11

M Jones -0.11

Similar Perfomance

H Mustard 0.7

B de Leede 0.7

A Lees 0.25

Opposite Perfomance

C Ackermann -0.7

G Drissell -0.2

M Jones -0.11

S Borthwick -0.11

Similar Perfomance

H Mustard 0.7

A Lees 0.5

M Jones 0.33

Opposite Perfomance

C Ackermann -0.7

S Borthwick -0.6

J Bushnell -0.2

Similar Perfomance

H Mustard 0.7

B de Leede 0.7

A Lees 0.4

G Drissell 0.33

Opposite Perfomance

C Ackermann -0.7

J Bushnell -0.11

S Borthwick -0.11

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

No data found

No data found