HOR 02 Mar 05:30 pm WIM

Lineup Out

Cartama Oval
European Cricket League

Best Player Combinations For
HOR vs WIM

How it Works?

This guide is super useful for identifying player combinations that are likely to score big. Use the filters to identify the best player combinations according to specific match scenarios.

Player correlate positively

Both players generally perform similarly when picked together. They either score high together or score low together. Maximise FPts by picking players that correlate positively with top players.

Player correlate negatively

Both players generally perform in an opposite manner. If one player scores high, the other usually scores low. Avoid picking players that correlate negatively with top player

Show Player Combinations on the basis of:

Best HOR Player Combinations

Best HOR Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad
M Whitlock BOW HOR
B Gordon AR HOR
J Vijay BAT HOR
T Coney WK HOR
P Murray WK HOR
Lesbourne Edwards BAT HOR
Arthur George BOW HOR
G Hankins BAT HOR
G Griffiths BOW HOR
H Hankins AR HOR
A Malik-l AR HOR
M Whitlock
B Gordon
J Vijay
T Coney
P Murray
Lesbourne Edwards
Arthur George
G Hankins
G Griffiths
H Hankins
A Malik-l
1
1 player
M Whitlock
2 player
M Whitlock
Strong Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
M Whitlock
2 player
B Gordon
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
M Whitlock
2 player
J Vijay
Weak Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
M Whitlock
2 player
T Coney
Weak Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
M Whitlock
2 player
P Murray
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.03
1 player
M Whitlock
2 player
Lesbourne Edwards
No Correlation
0.3
1 player
M Whitlock
2 player
Arthur George
Weak Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
M Whitlock
2 player
G Hankins
No Correlation
0.21
1 player
M Whitlock
2 player
G Griffiths
Weak Positive Correlation
0.19
1 player
M Whitlock
2 player
H Hankins
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
M Whitlock
2 player
A Malik-l
No Correlation
0.27
1 player
B Gordon
2 player
M Whitlock
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
B Gordon
2 player
B Gordon
Strong Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
B Gordon
2 player
J Vijay
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
B Gordon
2 player
T Coney
Weak Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
B Gordon
2 player
P Murray
Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
B Gordon
2 player
Lesbourne Edwards
No Correlation
0.37
1 player
B Gordon
2 player
Arthur George
Weak Positive Correlation
0.04
1 player
B Gordon
2 player
G Hankins
No Correlation
0.03
1 player
B Gordon
2 player
G Griffiths
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
B Gordon
2 player
H Hankins
Weak Positive Correlation
0.03
1 player
B Gordon
2 player
A Malik-l
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
J Vijay
2 player
M Whitlock
Weak Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
J Vijay
2 player
B Gordon
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
J Vijay
2 player
J Vijay
Strong Positive Correlation
0.29
1 player
J Vijay
2 player
T Coney
Weak Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
J Vijay
2 player
P Murray
Weak Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
J Vijay
2 player
Lesbourne Edwards
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
J Vijay
2 player
Arthur George
Weak Positive Correlation
0.16
1 player
J Vijay
2 player
G Hankins
No Correlation
0.27
1 player
J Vijay
2 player
G Griffiths
Weak Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
J Vijay
2 player
H Hankins
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
J Vijay
2 player
A Malik-l
Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
T Coney
2 player
M Whitlock
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
T Coney
2 player
B Gordon
Weak Positive Correlation
0.29
1 player
T Coney
2 player
J Vijay
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
T Coney
2 player
T Coney
Strong Positive Correlation
0.49
1 player
T Coney
2 player
P Murray
Positive Correlation
-0.2
1 player
T Coney
2 player
Lesbourne Edwards
No Correlation
0.54
1 player
T Coney
2 player
Arthur George
Positive Correlation
0.02
1 player
T Coney
2 player
G Hankins
No Correlation
0.17
1 player
T Coney
2 player
G Griffiths
No Correlation
-0.03
1 player
T Coney
2 player
H Hankins
No Correlation
0.1
1 player
T Coney
2 player
A Malik-l
No Correlation
0.3
1 player
P Murray
2 player
M Whitlock
Weak Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
P Murray
2 player
B Gordon
Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
P Murray
2 player
J Vijay
Weak Positive Correlation
0.49
1 player
P Murray
2 player
T Coney
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
P Murray
2 player
P Murray
Strong Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
P Murray
2 player
Lesbourne Edwards
Weak Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
P Murray
2 player
Arthur George
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
P Murray
2 player
G Hankins
Weak Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
P Murray
2 player
G Griffiths
Weak Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
P Murray
2 player
H Hankins
No Correlation
0.12
1 player
P Murray
2 player
A Malik-l
No Correlation
-0.03
1 player
Lesbourne Edwards
2 player
M Whitlock
No Correlation
0.17
1 player
Lesbourne Edwards
2 player
B Gordon
No Correlation
0.32
1 player
Lesbourne Edwards
2 player
J Vijay
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.2
1 player
Lesbourne Edwards
2 player
T Coney
No Correlation
0.27
1 player
Lesbourne Edwards
2 player
P Murray
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
Lesbourne Edwards
2 player
Lesbourne Edwards
Strong Positive Correlation
0.04
1 player
Lesbourne Edwards
2 player
Arthur George
No Correlation
0.58
1 player
Lesbourne Edwards
2 player
G Hankins
Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
Lesbourne Edwards
2 player
G Griffiths
Weak Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
Lesbourne Edwards
2 player
H Hankins
Weak Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
Lesbourne Edwards
2 player
A Malik-l
Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
Arthur George
2 player
M Whitlock
Weak Positive Correlation
0.37
1 player
Arthur George
2 player
B Gordon
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
Arthur George
2 player
J Vijay
Weak Positive Correlation
0.54
1 player
Arthur George
2 player
T Coney
Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
Arthur George
2 player
P Murray
Weak Positive Correlation
0.04
1 player
Arthur George
2 player
Lesbourne Edwards
No Correlation
1
1 player
Arthur George
2 player
Arthur George
Strong Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
Arthur George
2 player
G Hankins
No Correlation
0.07
1 player
Arthur George
2 player
G Griffiths
No Correlation
-0.02
1 player
Arthur George
2 player
H Hankins
No Correlation
0.22
1 player
Arthur George
2 player
A Malik-l
Weak Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
G Hankins
2 player
M Whitlock
No Correlation
0.04
1 player
G Hankins
2 player
B Gordon
No Correlation
0.16
1 player
G Hankins
2 player
J Vijay
No Correlation
0.02
1 player
G Hankins
2 player
T Coney
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
G Hankins
2 player
P Murray
Weak Positive Correlation
0.58
1 player
G Hankins
2 player
Lesbourne Edwards
Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
G Hankins
2 player
Arthur George
No Correlation
1
1 player
G Hankins
2 player
G Hankins
Strong Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
G Hankins
2 player
G Griffiths
Weak Positive Correlation
0.48
1 player
G Hankins
2 player
H Hankins
Positive Correlation
0.52
1 player
G Hankins
2 player
A Malik-l
Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
G Griffiths
2 player
M Whitlock
Weak Positive Correlation
0.03
1 player
G Griffiths
2 player
B Gordon
No Correlation
0.27
1 player
G Griffiths
2 player
J Vijay
Weak Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
G Griffiths
2 player
T Coney
No Correlation
0.21
1 player
G Griffiths
2 player
P Murray
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
G Griffiths
2 player
Lesbourne Edwards
Weak Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
G Griffiths
2 player
Arthur George
No Correlation
0.26
1 player
G Griffiths
2 player
G Hankins
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
G Griffiths
2 player
G Griffiths
Strong Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
G Griffiths
2 player
H Hankins
Weak Positive Correlation
0.37
1 player
G Griffiths
2 player
A Malik-l
Weak Positive Correlation
0.19
1 player
H Hankins
2 player
M Whitlock
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
H Hankins
2 player
B Gordon
Weak Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
H Hankins
2 player
J Vijay
No Correlation
-0.03
1 player
H Hankins
2 player
T Coney
No Correlation
0.12
1 player
H Hankins
2 player
P Murray
No Correlation
0.38
1 player
H Hankins
2 player
Lesbourne Edwards
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.02
1 player
H Hankins
2 player
Arthur George
No Correlation
0.48
1 player
H Hankins
2 player
G Hankins
Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
H Hankins
2 player
G Griffiths
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
H Hankins
2 player
H Hankins
Strong Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
H Hankins
2 player
A Malik-l
Weak Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
A Malik-l
2 player
M Whitlock
No Correlation
0.03
1 player
A Malik-l
2 player
B Gordon
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
A Malik-l
2 player
J Vijay
Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
A Malik-l
2 player
T Coney
No Correlation
0.12
1 player
A Malik-l
2 player
P Murray
No Correlation
0.47
1 player
A Malik-l
2 player
Lesbourne Edwards
Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
A Malik-l
2 player
Arthur George
Weak Positive Correlation
0.52
1 player
A Malik-l
2 player
G Hankins
Positive Correlation
0.37
1 player
A Malik-l
2 player
G Griffiths
Weak Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
A Malik-l
2 player
H Hankins
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
A Malik-l
2 player
A Malik-l
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

No data found

High Performing Players

1 G Hankins

BAT
Similar Perfomance
Lesbourne Edwards 0.58
A Malik-l 0.52
H Hankins 0.48
G Griffiths 0.26
P Murray 0.23
M Whitlock 0.18
J Vijay 0.16
Arthur George 0.11
B Gordon 0.04
T Coney 0.02

2 A Malik-l

AR
Similar Perfomance
G Hankins 0.52
Lesbourne Edwards 0.47
J Vijay 0.4
H Hankins 0.39
G Griffiths 0.37
Arthur George 0.22
P Murray 0.12
T Coney 0.1
M Whitlock 0.08
B Gordon 0.03

3 H Hankins

AR
Similar Perfomance
G Hankins 0.48
A Malik-l 0.39
Lesbourne Edwards 0.38
G Griffiths 0.33
B Gordon 0.28
M Whitlock 0.19
P Murray 0.12
J Vijay 0.1
Opposite Perfomance
T Coney -0.03
Arthur George -0.02

4 G Griffiths

BOW
Similar Perfomance
A Malik-l 0.37
H Hankins 0.33
Lesbourne Edwards 0.28
J Vijay 0.27
G Hankins 0.26
M Whitlock 0.21
P Murray 0.21
T Coney 0.17
Arthur George 0.07
B Gordon 0.03

5 Lesbourne Edwards

BAT
Similar Perfomance
G Hankins 0.58
A Malik-l 0.47
H Hankins 0.38
J Vijay 0.32
G Griffiths 0.28
P Murray 0.27
B Gordon 0.17
Arthur George 0.04
Opposite Perfomance
T Coney -0.2
M Whitlock -0.03

Best WIM Player Combinations

Best WIM Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad
OL Pike BOW WIM
R Lamb AR WIM
JP Webb BAT WIM
J Palsar BOW WIM
J Speller BOW WIM
Whipple AR WIM
M Benning AR WIM
B Tattam BAT WIM
H Merriman BAT WIM
T Lloyd BAT WIM
J Weir WK WIM
OL Pike
R Lamb
JP Webb
J Palsar
J Speller
Whipple
M Benning
B Tattam
H Merriman
T Lloyd
J Weir
1
1 player
OL Pike
2 player
OL Pike
Strong Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
OL Pike
2 player
R Lamb
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
OL Pike
2 player
JP Webb
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
OL Pike
2 player
J Palsar
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
OL Pike
2 player
J Speller
No Correlation
0.1
1 player
OL Pike
2 player
Whipple
No Correlation
-0.12
1 player
OL Pike
2 player
M Benning
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
OL Pike
2 player
B Tattam
Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
OL Pike
2 player
H Merriman
Positive Correlation
-0.08
1 player
OL Pike
2 player
T Lloyd
No Correlation
0.24
1 player
OL Pike
2 player
J Weir
Weak Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
R Lamb
2 player
OL Pike
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
R Lamb
2 player
R Lamb
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.3
1 player
R Lamb
2 player
JP Webb
Weak Negative Correlation
0.25
1 player
R Lamb
2 player
J Palsar
Weak Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
R Lamb
2 player
J Speller
Weak Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
R Lamb
2 player
Whipple
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
R Lamb
2 player
M Benning
Weak Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
R Lamb
2 player
B Tattam
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
R Lamb
2 player
H Merriman
Weak Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
R Lamb
2 player
T Lloyd
No Correlation
0.6
1 player
R Lamb
2 player
J Weir
Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
JP Webb
2 player
OL Pike
No Correlation
-0.3
1 player
JP Webb
2 player
R Lamb
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
JP Webb
2 player
JP Webb
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.42
1 player
JP Webb
2 player
J Palsar
Negative Correlation
-0.06
1 player
JP Webb
2 player
J Speller
No Correlation
0.13
1 player
JP Webb
2 player
Whipple
No Correlation
-0.07
1 player
JP Webb
2 player
M Benning
No Correlation
-0.05
1 player
JP Webb
2 player
B Tattam
No Correlation
0.38
1 player
JP Webb
2 player
H Merriman
Weak Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
JP Webb
2 player
T Lloyd
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.17
1 player
JP Webb
2 player
J Weir
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
J Palsar
2 player
OL Pike
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
J Palsar
2 player
R Lamb
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.42
1 player
J Palsar
2 player
JP Webb
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
J Palsar
2 player
J Palsar
Strong Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
J Palsar
2 player
J Speller
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
J Palsar
2 player
Whipple
Weak Positive Correlation
0.57
1 player
J Palsar
2 player
M Benning
Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
J Palsar
2 player
B Tattam
No Correlation
-0.27
1 player
J Palsar
2 player
H Merriman
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
J Palsar
2 player
T Lloyd
No Correlation
0.53
1 player
J Palsar
2 player
J Weir
Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
J Speller
2 player
OL Pike
No Correlation
0.36
1 player
J Speller
2 player
R Lamb
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.06
1 player
J Speller
2 player
JP Webb
No Correlation
0.13
1 player
J Speller
2 player
J Palsar
No Correlation
1
1 player
J Speller
2 player
J Speller
Strong Positive Correlation
0.57
1 player
J Speller
2 player
Whipple
Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
J Speller
2 player
M Benning
Weak Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
J Speller
2 player
B Tattam
Weak Positive Correlation
0.16
1 player
J Speller
2 player
H Merriman
No Correlation
0.48
1 player
J Speller
2 player
T Lloyd
Positive Correlation
0.6
1 player
J Speller
2 player
J Weir
Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
Whipple
2 player
OL Pike
No Correlation
0.07
1 player
Whipple
2 player
R Lamb
No Correlation
0.13
1 player
Whipple
2 player
JP Webb
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
Whipple
2 player
J Palsar
Weak Positive Correlation
0.57
1 player
Whipple
2 player
J Speller
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
Whipple
2 player
Whipple
Strong Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
Whipple
2 player
M Benning
Positive Correlation
0.05
1 player
Whipple
2 player
B Tattam
No Correlation
-0.07
1 player
Whipple
2 player
H Merriman
No Correlation
0.53
1 player
Whipple
2 player
T Lloyd
Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
Whipple
2 player
J Weir
Positive Correlation
-0.12
1 player
M Benning
2 player
OL Pike
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
M Benning
2 player
R Lamb
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.07
1 player
M Benning
2 player
JP Webb
No Correlation
0.57
1 player
M Benning
2 player
J Palsar
Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
M Benning
2 player
J Speller
Weak Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
M Benning
2 player
Whipple
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M Benning
2 player
M Benning
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.02
1 player
M Benning
2 player
B Tattam
No Correlation
-0.37
1 player
M Benning
2 player
H Merriman
Weak Negative Correlation
0.47
1 player
M Benning
2 player
T Lloyd
Positive Correlation
0.37
1 player
M Benning
2 player
J Weir
Weak Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
B Tattam
2 player
OL Pike
Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
B Tattam
2 player
R Lamb
No Correlation
-0.05
1 player
B Tattam
2 player
JP Webb
No Correlation
0.15
1 player
B Tattam
2 player
J Palsar
No Correlation
0.26
1 player
B Tattam
2 player
J Speller
Weak Positive Correlation
0.05
1 player
B Tattam
2 player
Whipple
No Correlation
-0.02
1 player
B Tattam
2 player
M Benning
No Correlation
1
1 player
B Tattam
2 player
B Tattam
Strong Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
B Tattam
2 player
H Merriman
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
B Tattam
2 player
T Lloyd
No Correlation
0.37
1 player
B Tattam
2 player
J Weir
Weak Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
H Merriman
2 player
OL Pike
Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
H Merriman
2 player
R Lamb
Weak Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
H Merriman
2 player
JP Webb
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.27
1 player
H Merriman
2 player
J Palsar
Weak Negative Correlation
0.16
1 player
H Merriman
2 player
J Speller
No Correlation
-0.07
1 player
H Merriman
2 player
Whipple
No Correlation
-0.37
1 player
H Merriman
2 player
M Benning
Weak Negative Correlation
0.47
1 player
H Merriman
2 player
B Tattam
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
H Merriman
2 player
H Merriman
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
H Merriman
2 player
T Lloyd
No Correlation
0.22
1 player
H Merriman
2 player
J Weir
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.08
1 player
T Lloyd
2 player
OL Pike
No Correlation
0.1
1 player
T Lloyd
2 player
R Lamb
No Correlation
0.38
1 player
T Lloyd
2 player
JP Webb
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
T Lloyd
2 player
J Palsar
No Correlation
0.48
1 player
T Lloyd
2 player
J Speller
Positive Correlation
0.53
1 player
T Lloyd
2 player
Whipple
Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
T Lloyd
2 player
M Benning
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
T Lloyd
2 player
B Tattam
No Correlation
0
1 player
T Lloyd
2 player
H Merriman
No Correlation
1
1 player
T Lloyd
2 player
T Lloyd
Strong Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
T Lloyd
2 player
J Weir
No Correlation
0.24
1 player
J Weir
2 player
OL Pike
Weak Positive Correlation
0.6
1 player
J Weir
2 player
R Lamb
Positive Correlation
-0.17
1 player
J Weir
2 player
JP Webb
No Correlation
0.53
1 player
J Weir
2 player
J Palsar
Positive Correlation
0.6
1 player
J Weir
2 player
J Speller
Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
J Weir
2 player
Whipple
Positive Correlation
0.37
1 player
J Weir
2 player
M Benning
Weak Positive Correlation
0.37
1 player
J Weir
2 player
B Tattam
Weak Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
J Weir
2 player
H Merriman
Weak Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
J Weir
2 player
T Lloyd
No Correlation
1
1 player
J Weir
2 player
J Weir
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick R Lamb and J Weir together
Positive Correlation

Pick J Speller and J Weir together
Positive Correlation

High Performing Players

1 Whipple

AR
Similar Perfomance
J Speller 0.57
T Lloyd 0.53
M Benning 0.42
J Weir 0.42
J Palsar 0.25
JP Webb 0.13
OL Pike 0.1
R Lamb 0.07
B Tattam 0.05
Opposite Perfomance
H Merriman -0.07

2 T Lloyd

BAT
Similar Perfomance
Whipple 0.53
J Speller 0.48
M Benning 0.47
JP Webb 0.38
J Weir 0.13
R Lamb 0.1
Opposite Perfomance
OL Pike -0.08

3 JP Webb

BAT
Similar Perfomance
H Merriman 0.38
T Lloyd 0.38
OL Pike 0.14
Whipple 0.13
Opposite Perfomance
J Palsar -0.42
R Lamb -0.3
J Weir -0.17
M Benning -0.07
J Speller -0.06
B Tattam -0.05

4 M Benning

AR
Similar Perfomance
J Palsar 0.57
T Lloyd 0.47
Whipple 0.42
J Weir 0.37
R Lamb 0.33
J Speller 0.3
Opposite Perfomance
H Merriman -0.37
OL Pike -0.12
JP Webb -0.07
B Tattam -0.02

5 J Speller

BOW
Similar Perfomance
J Weir 0.6
Whipple 0.57
T Lloyd 0.48
R Lamb 0.36
M Benning 0.3
B Tattam 0.26
H Merriman 0.16
J Palsar 0.13
OL Pike 0.08
Opposite Perfomance
JP Webb -0.06

Best HOR Player Combinations

Best HOR Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad
M Whitlock BOW HOR
B Gordon AR HOR
J Vijay BAT HOR
T Coney WK HOR
P Murray WK HOR
Lesbourne Edwards BAT HOR
Arthur George BOW HOR
G Hankins BAT HOR
G Griffiths BOW HOR
H Hankins AR HOR
A Malik-l AR HOR
M Whitlock
B Gordon
J Vijay
T Coney
P Murray
Lesbourne Edwards
Arthur George
G Hankins
G Griffiths
H Hankins
A Malik-l
1
1 player
M Whitlock
2 player
M Whitlock
Strong Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
M Whitlock
2 player
B Gordon
No Correlation
0
1 player
M Whitlock
2 player
J Vijay
No Correlation
0.16
1 player
M Whitlock
2 player
T Coney
No Correlation
-0.08
1 player
M Whitlock
2 player
P Murray
No Correlation
-0.5
1 player
M Whitlock
2 player
Lesbourne Edwards
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
M Whitlock
2 player
Arthur George
No Correlation
-0.07
1 player
M Whitlock
2 player
G Hankins
No Correlation
-0.28
1 player
M Whitlock
2 player
G Griffiths
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.4
1 player
M Whitlock
2 player
H Hankins
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.28
1 player
M Whitlock
2 player
A Malik-l
Weak Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
B Gordon
2 player
M Whitlock
No Correlation
1
1 player
B Gordon
2 player
B Gordon
Strong Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
B Gordon
2 player
J Vijay
No Correlation
-0.25
1 player
B Gordon
2 player
T Coney
Weak Negative Correlation
0.29
1 player
B Gordon
2 player
P Murray
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
B Gordon
2 player
Lesbourne Edwards
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
B Gordon
2 player
Arthur George
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
B Gordon
2 player
G Hankins
No Correlation
-0.38
1 player
B Gordon
2 player
G Griffiths
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.2
1 player
B Gordon
2 player
H Hankins
No Correlation
-0.08
1 player
B Gordon
2 player
A Malik-l
No Correlation
0
1 player
J Vijay
2 player
M Whitlock
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
J Vijay
2 player
B Gordon
No Correlation
1
1 player
J Vijay
2 player
J Vijay
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
J Vijay
2 player
T Coney
No Correlation
0
1 player
J Vijay
2 player
P Murray
No Correlation
-0.23
1 player
J Vijay
2 player
Lesbourne Edwards
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.17
1 player
J Vijay
2 player
Arthur George
No Correlation
0
1 player
J Vijay
2 player
G Hankins
No Correlation
-0.11
1 player
J Vijay
2 player
G Griffiths
No Correlation
-0.37
1 player
J Vijay
2 player
H Hankins
Weak Negative Correlation
0.1
1 player
J Vijay
2 player
A Malik-l
No Correlation
0.16
1 player
T Coney
2 player
M Whitlock
No Correlation
-0.25
1 player
T Coney
2 player
B Gordon
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
T Coney
2 player
J Vijay
No Correlation
1
1 player
T Coney
2 player
T Coney
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.11
1 player
T Coney
2 player
P Murray
No Correlation
-0.56
1 player
T Coney
2 player
Lesbourne Edwards
Negative Correlation
-0.25
1 player
T Coney
2 player
Arthur George
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.3
1 player
T Coney
2 player
G Hankins
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
T Coney
2 player
G Griffiths
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.57
1 player
T Coney
2 player
H Hankins
Negative Correlation
-0.47
1 player
T Coney
2 player
A Malik-l
Negative Correlation
-0.08
1 player
P Murray
2 player
M Whitlock
No Correlation
0.29
1 player
P Murray
2 player
B Gordon
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
P Murray
2 player
J Vijay
No Correlation
-0.11
1 player
P Murray
2 player
T Coney
No Correlation
1
1 player
P Murray
2 player
P Murray
Strong Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
P Murray
2 player
Lesbourne Edwards
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
P Murray
2 player
Arthur George
Weak Positive Correlation
0.19
1 player
P Murray
2 player
G Hankins
No Correlation
-0.52
1 player
P Murray
2 player
G Griffiths
Negative Correlation
-0.05
1 player
P Murray
2 player
H Hankins
No Correlation
-0.12
1 player
P Murray
2 player
A Malik-l
No Correlation
-0.5
1 player
Lesbourne Edwards
2 player
M Whitlock
Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
Lesbourne Edwards
2 player
B Gordon
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
Lesbourne Edwards
2 player
J Vijay
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.56
1 player
Lesbourne Edwards
2 player
T Coney
Negative Correlation
0.17
1 player
Lesbourne Edwards
2 player
P Murray
No Correlation
1
1 player
Lesbourne Edwards
2 player
Lesbourne Edwards
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.17
1 player
Lesbourne Edwards
2 player
Arthur George
No Correlation
0.85
1 player
Lesbourne Edwards
2 player
G Hankins
Strong Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
Lesbourne Edwards
2 player
G Griffiths
Weak Positive Correlation
0.85
1 player
Lesbourne Edwards
2 player
H Hankins
Strong Positive Correlation
0.54
1 player
Lesbourne Edwards
2 player
A Malik-l
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
Arthur George
2 player
M Whitlock
No Correlation
0
1 player
Arthur George
2 player
B Gordon
No Correlation
-0.17
1 player
Arthur George
2 player
J Vijay
No Correlation
-0.25
1 player
Arthur George
2 player
T Coney
Weak Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
Arthur George
2 player
P Murray
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.17
1 player
Arthur George
2 player
Lesbourne Edwards
No Correlation
1
1 player
Arthur George
2 player
Arthur George
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
Arthur George
2 player
G Hankins
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.27
1 player
Arthur George
2 player
G Griffiths
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
Arthur George
2 player
H Hankins
No Correlation
0
1 player
Arthur George
2 player
A Malik-l
No Correlation
-0.07
1 player
G Hankins
2 player
M Whitlock
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
G Hankins
2 player
B Gordon
No Correlation
0
1 player
G Hankins
2 player
J Vijay
No Correlation
-0.3
1 player
G Hankins
2 player
T Coney
Weak Negative Correlation
0.19
1 player
G Hankins
2 player
P Murray
No Correlation
0.85
1 player
G Hankins
2 player
Lesbourne Edwards
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
G Hankins
2 player
Arthur George
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
G Hankins
2 player
G Hankins
Strong Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
G Hankins
2 player
G Griffiths
Weak Positive Correlation
0.52
1 player
G Hankins
2 player
H Hankins
Positive Correlation
0.41
1 player
G Hankins
2 player
A Malik-l
Positive Correlation
-0.28
1 player
G Griffiths
2 player
M Whitlock
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.38
1 player
G Griffiths
2 player
B Gordon
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.11
1 player
G Griffiths
2 player
J Vijay
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
G Griffiths
2 player
T Coney
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.52
1 player
G Griffiths
2 player
P Murray
Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
G Griffiths
2 player
Lesbourne Edwards
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.27
1 player
G Griffiths
2 player
Arthur George
Weak Negative Correlation
0.31
1 player
G Griffiths
2 player
G Hankins
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
G Griffiths
2 player
G Griffiths
Strong Positive Correlation
0.37
1 player
G Griffiths
2 player
H Hankins
Weak Positive Correlation
0.44
1 player
G Griffiths
2 player
A Malik-l
Positive Correlation
-0.4
1 player
H Hankins
2 player
M Whitlock
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.2
1 player
H Hankins
2 player
B Gordon
No Correlation
-0.37
1 player
H Hankins
2 player
J Vijay
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.57
1 player
H Hankins
2 player
T Coney
Negative Correlation
-0.05
1 player
H Hankins
2 player
P Murray
No Correlation
0.85
1 player
H Hankins
2 player
Lesbourne Edwards
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
H Hankins
2 player
Arthur George
No Correlation
0.52
1 player
H Hankins
2 player
G Hankins
Positive Correlation
0.37
1 player
H Hankins
2 player
G Griffiths
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
H Hankins
2 player
H Hankins
Strong Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
H Hankins
2 player
A Malik-l
Positive Correlation
-0.28
1 player
A Malik-l
2 player
M Whitlock
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.08
1 player
A Malik-l
2 player
B Gordon
No Correlation
0.1
1 player
A Malik-l
2 player
J Vijay
No Correlation
-0.47
1 player
A Malik-l
2 player
T Coney
Negative Correlation
-0.12
1 player
A Malik-l
2 player
P Murray
No Correlation
0.54
1 player
A Malik-l
2 player
Lesbourne Edwards
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
A Malik-l
2 player
Arthur George
No Correlation
0.41
1 player
A Malik-l
2 player
G Hankins
Positive Correlation
0.44
1 player
A Malik-l
2 player
G Griffiths
Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
A Malik-l
2 player
H Hankins
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
A Malik-l
2 player
A Malik-l
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick Lesbourne Edwards and G Hankins together
Strong Positive Correlation

Pick Lesbourne Edwards and H Hankins together
Strong Positive Correlation

High Performing Players

1 G Hankins

BAT
Similar Perfomance
Lesbourne Edwards 0.85
H Hankins 0.52
A Malik-l 0.41
G Griffiths 0.31
P Murray 0.19
Opposite Perfomance
T Coney -0.3
Arthur George -0.23
B Gordon -0.14
M Whitlock -0.07

2 A Malik-l

AR
Similar Perfomance
Lesbourne Edwards 0.54
H Hankins 0.47
G Griffiths 0.44
G Hankins 0.41
J Vijay 0.1
Opposite Perfomance
T Coney -0.47
M Whitlock -0.28
P Murray -0.12
B Gordon -0.08

3 G Griffiths

BOW
Similar Perfomance
A Malik-l 0.44
H Hankins 0.37
Lesbourne Edwards 0.33
G Hankins 0.31
Opposite Perfomance
P Murray -0.52
B Gordon -0.38
T Coney -0.33
M Whitlock -0.28
Arthur George -0.27
J Vijay -0.11

4 H Hankins

AR
Similar Perfomance
Lesbourne Edwards 0.85
G Hankins 0.52
A Malik-l 0.47
G Griffiths 0.37
Opposite Perfomance
T Coney -0.57
M Whitlock -0.4
J Vijay -0.37
B Gordon -0.2
P Murray -0.05

5 P Murray

WK
Similar Perfomance
Arthur George 0.33
B Gordon 0.29
G Hankins 0.19
Lesbourne Edwards 0.17
Opposite Perfomance
G Griffiths -0.52
A Malik-l -0.12
T Coney -0.11
M Whitlock -0.08
H Hankins -0.05

Best WIM Player Combinations

Best WIM Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad
OL Pike BOW WIM
R Lamb AR WIM
JP Webb BAT WIM
J Palsar BOW WIM
J Speller BOW WIM
Whipple AR WIM
M Benning AR WIM
B Tattam BAT WIM
H Merriman BAT WIM
T Lloyd BAT WIM
J Weir WK WIM
OL Pike
R Lamb
JP Webb
J Palsar
J Speller
Whipple
M Benning
B Tattam
H Merriman
T Lloyd
J Weir
1
1 player
OL Pike
2 player
OL Pike
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
OL Pike
2 player
R Lamb
Weak Negative Correlation
0.35
1 player
OL Pike
2 player
JP Webb
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
OL Pike
2 player
J Palsar
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
OL Pike
2 player
J Speller
Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
OL Pike
2 player
Whipple
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
OL Pike
2 player
M Benning
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
OL Pike
2 player
B Tattam
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
OL Pike
2 player
H Merriman
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
OL Pike
2 player
T Lloyd
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.67
1 player
OL Pike
2 player
J Weir
Negative Correlation
-0.35
1 player
R Lamb
2 player
OL Pike
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
R Lamb
2 player
R Lamb
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.67
1 player
R Lamb
2 player
JP Webb
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
R Lamb
2 player
J Palsar
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
R Lamb
2 player
J Speller
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
R Lamb
2 player
Whipple
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
R Lamb
2 player
M Benning
No Correlation
0
1 player
R Lamb
2 player
B Tattam
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
R Lamb
2 player
H Merriman
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
R Lamb
2 player
T Lloyd
No Correlation
0.67
1 player
R Lamb
2 player
J Weir
Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
JP Webb
2 player
OL Pike
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.67
1 player
JP Webb
2 player
R Lamb
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
JP Webb
2 player
JP Webb
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
JP Webb
2 player
J Palsar
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
JP Webb
2 player
J Speller
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
JP Webb
2 player
Whipple
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
JP Webb
2 player
M Benning
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
JP Webb
2 player
B Tattam
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
JP Webb
2 player
H Merriman
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
JP Webb
2 player
T Lloyd
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
JP Webb
2 player
J Weir
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.35
1 player
J Palsar
2 player
OL Pike
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
J Palsar
2 player
R Lamb
No Correlation
0
1 player
J Palsar
2 player
JP Webb
No Correlation
1
1 player
J Palsar
2 player
J Palsar
Strong Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
J Palsar
2 player
J Speller
Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
J Palsar
2 player
Whipple
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
J Palsar
2 player
M Benning
No Correlation
0
1 player
J Palsar
2 player
B Tattam
No Correlation
0
1 player
J Palsar
2 player
H Merriman
No Correlation
0
1 player
J Palsar
2 player
T Lloyd
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
J Palsar
2 player
J Weir
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
J Speller
2 player
OL Pike
Negative Correlation
0.42
1 player
J Speller
2 player
R Lamb
Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
J Speller
2 player
JP Webb
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
J Speller
2 player
J Palsar
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
J Speller
2 player
J Speller
Strong Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
J Speller
2 player
Whipple
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
J Speller
2 player
M Benning
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
J Speller
2 player
B Tattam
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
J Speller
2 player
H Merriman
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
J Speller
2 player
T Lloyd
Positive Correlation
0.67
1 player
J Speller
2 player
J Weir
Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
Whipple
2 player
OL Pike
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
Whipple
2 player
R Lamb
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
Whipple
2 player
JP Webb
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
Whipple
2 player
J Palsar
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
Whipple
2 player
J Speller
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
Whipple
2 player
Whipple
Strong Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
Whipple
2 player
M Benning
Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
Whipple
2 player
B Tattam
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.67
1 player
Whipple
2 player
H Merriman
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
Whipple
2 player
T Lloyd
Strong Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
Whipple
2 player
J Weir
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
M Benning
2 player
OL Pike
Weak Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
M Benning
2 player
R Lamb
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
M Benning
2 player
JP Webb
No Correlation
0
1 player
M Benning
2 player
J Palsar
No Correlation
0
1 player
M Benning
2 player
J Speller
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
M Benning
2 player
Whipple
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M Benning
2 player
M Benning
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
M Benning
2 player
B Tattam
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
M Benning
2 player
H Merriman
Negative Correlation
0.42
1 player
M Benning
2 player
T Lloyd
Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
M Benning
2 player
J Weir
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
B Tattam
2 player
OL Pike
No Correlation
0
1 player
B Tattam
2 player
R Lamb
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
B Tattam
2 player
JP Webb
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
B Tattam
2 player
J Palsar
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
B Tattam
2 player
J Speller
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
B Tattam
2 player
Whipple
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
B Tattam
2 player
M Benning
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
B Tattam
2 player
B Tattam
Strong Positive Correlation
0.67
1 player
B Tattam
2 player
H Merriman
Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
B Tattam
2 player
T Lloyd
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
B Tattam
2 player
J Weir
Weak Negative Correlation
0.35
1 player
H Merriman
2 player
OL Pike
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
H Merriman
2 player
R Lamb
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
H Merriman
2 player
JP Webb
No Correlation
0
1 player
H Merriman
2 player
J Palsar
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
H Merriman
2 player
J Speller
No Correlation
-0.67
1 player
H Merriman
2 player
Whipple
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
H Merriman
2 player
M Benning
Negative Correlation
0.67
1 player
H Merriman
2 player
B Tattam
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
H Merriman
2 player
H Merriman
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.67
1 player
H Merriman
2 player
T Lloyd
Negative Correlation
-0.67
1 player
H Merriman
2 player
J Weir
Negative Correlation
-0.35
1 player
T Lloyd
2 player
OL Pike
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
T Lloyd
2 player
R Lamb
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
T Lloyd
2 player
JP Webb
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
T Lloyd
2 player
J Palsar
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
T Lloyd
2 player
J Speller
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
T Lloyd
2 player
Whipple
Strong Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
T Lloyd
2 player
M Benning
Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
T Lloyd
2 player
B Tattam
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.67
1 player
T Lloyd
2 player
H Merriman
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
T Lloyd
2 player
T Lloyd
Strong Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
T Lloyd
2 player
J Weir
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.67
1 player
J Weir
2 player
OL Pike
Negative Correlation
0.67
1 player
J Weir
2 player
R Lamb
Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
J Weir
2 player
JP Webb
Weak Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
J Weir
2 player
J Palsar
Positive Correlation
0.67
1 player
J Weir
2 player
J Speller
Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
J Weir
2 player
Whipple
Weak Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
J Weir
2 player
M Benning
Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
J Weir
2 player
B Tattam
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.67
1 player
J Weir
2 player
H Merriman
Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
J Weir
2 player
T Lloyd
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
J Weir
2 player
J Weir
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick J Palsar and J Speller together
Positive Correlation

Pick J Palsar and J Weir together
Positive Correlation

Pick Whipple and T Lloyd together
Strong Positive Correlation

Pick B Tattam and H Merriman together
Positive Correlation

Pick OL Pike and J Speller together
Negative Correlation

Pick OL Pike and J Weir together
Negative Correlation

Pick R Lamb and JP Webb together
Negative Correlation

Pick Whipple and H Merriman together
Negative Correlation

Pick M Benning and B Tattam together
Negative Correlation

Pick M Benning and H Merriman together
Negative Correlation

Pick H Merriman and T Lloyd together
Negative Correlation

Pick H Merriman and J Weir together
Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 Whipple

AR
Similar Perfomance
T Lloyd 1
M Benning 0.42
J Palsar 0.35
JP Webb 0.33
J Speller 0.33
J Weir 0.33
Opposite Perfomance
H Merriman -0.67
OL Pike -0.33
B Tattam -0.33

2 J Weir

WK
Similar Perfomance
J Palsar 0.7
R Lamb 0.67
J Speller 0.67
M Benning 0.42
Whipple 0.33
T Lloyd 0.33
Opposite Perfomance
OL Pike -0.67
H Merriman -0.67
JP Webb -0.33
B Tattam -0.33

3 JP Webb

BAT
Similar Perfomance
OL Pike 0.35
Whipple 0.33
T Lloyd 0.33
M Benning 0.14
Opposite Perfomance
R Lamb -0.67
B Tattam -0.33
J Weir -0.33
J Speller -0.14

4 T Lloyd

BAT
Similar Perfomance
Whipple 1
J Speller 0.42
M Benning 0.42
JP Webb 0.33
J Weir 0.33
Opposite Perfomance
H Merriman -0.67
OL Pike -0.35
B Tattam -0.33

5 M Benning

AR
Similar Perfomance
Whipple 0.42
T Lloyd 0.42
J Weir 0.42
R Lamb 0.14
JP Webb 0.14
Opposite Perfomance
H Merriman -0.7
B Tattam -0.7
OL Pike -0.23

PerfectLineup © 2024. All Rights Reserved