HOR vs TW

This guide is super useful for identifying player combinations that are likely to score big. Use the filters to identify the best player combinations according to specific match scenarios.

Both players generally perform similarly when picked together. They either score high together or score low together. Maximise FPts by picking players that correlate positively with top players.

Both players generally perform in an opposite manner. If one player scores high, the other usually scores low. Avoid picking players that correlate negatively with top player

Show Player Combinations on the basis of:

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

J Hogarth AR HOR

G Clarke BAT HOR

M Whitlock BOW HOR

P Murray WK HOR

B Allchin BOW HOR

Arthur George BOW HOR

J Palmer WK HOR

A Roberts BAT HOR

G Farquhar BAT HOR

B Whitlock BOW HOR

G Hankins BAT HOR

J Hogarth

G Clarke

M Whitlock

P Murray

B Allchin

Arthur George

J Palmer

A Roberts

G Farquhar

B Whitlock

G Hankins

1

1 player

J Hogarth

2 player

J Hogarth

Strong Positive Correlation

0.31

1 player

J Hogarth

2 player

M Whitlock

Weak Positive Correlation

0.49

1 player

J Hogarth

2 player

P Murray

Positive Correlation

0.26

1 player

J Hogarth

2 player

B Allchin

Weak Positive Correlation

0.65

1 player

J Hogarth

2 player

Arthur George

Positive Correlation

0.52

1 player

J Hogarth

2 player

J Palmer

Positive Correlation

0.48

1 player

J Hogarth

2 player

A Roberts

Positive Correlation

0.92

1 player

J Hogarth

2 player

B Whitlock

Strong Positive Correlation

0.48

1 player

J Hogarth

2 player

G Hankins

Positive Correlation

0.31

1 player

M Whitlock

2 player

J Hogarth

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

M Whitlock

2 player

M Whitlock

Strong Positive Correlation

0.32

1 player

M Whitlock

2 player

P Murray

Weak Positive Correlation

0.67

1 player

M Whitlock

2 player

B Allchin

Positive Correlation

0.24

1 player

M Whitlock

2 player

Arthur George

Weak Positive Correlation

0.47

1 player

M Whitlock

2 player

J Palmer

Positive Correlation

0.26

1 player

M Whitlock

2 player

A Roberts

Weak Positive Correlation

0.1

1 player

M Whitlock

2 player

B Whitlock

No Correlation

0.13

1 player

M Whitlock

2 player

G Hankins

No Correlation

0.49

1 player

P Murray

2 player

J Hogarth

Positive Correlation

0.32

1 player

P Murray

2 player

M Whitlock

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

P Murray

2 player

P Murray

Strong Positive Correlation

0.35

1 player

P Murray

2 player

B Allchin

Weak Positive Correlation

0.41

1 player

P Murray

2 player

Arthur George

Positive Correlation

0.32

1 player

P Murray

2 player

J Palmer

Weak Positive Correlation

0.2

1 player

P Murray

2 player

A Roberts

Weak Positive Correlation

0.47

1 player

P Murray

2 player

B Whitlock

Positive Correlation

0.2

1 player

P Murray

2 player

G Hankins

Weak Positive Correlation

0.26

1 player

B Allchin

2 player

J Hogarth

Weak Positive Correlation

0.67

1 player

B Allchin

2 player

M Whitlock

Positive Correlation

0.35

1 player

B Allchin

2 player

P Murray

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

B Allchin

2 player

B Allchin

Strong Positive Correlation

0.15

1 player

B Allchin

2 player

Arthur George

No Correlation

0.48

1 player

B Allchin

2 player

J Palmer

Positive Correlation

0.6

1 player

B Allchin

2 player

A Roberts

Positive Correlation

0.6

1 player

B Allchin

2 player

B Whitlock

Positive Correlation

0.08

1 player

B Allchin

2 player

G Hankins

No Correlation

0.65

1 player

Arthur George

2 player

J Hogarth

Positive Correlation

0.24

1 player

Arthur George

2 player

M Whitlock

Weak Positive Correlation

0.41

1 player

Arthur George

2 player

P Murray

Positive Correlation

0.15

1 player

Arthur George

2 player

B Allchin

No Correlation

1

1 player

Arthur George

2 player

Arthur George

Strong Positive Correlation

0.06

1 player

Arthur George

2 player

J Palmer

No Correlation

0.18

1 player

Arthur George

2 player

A Roberts

No Correlation

0.5

1 player

Arthur George

2 player

B Whitlock

Positive Correlation

0.05

1 player

Arthur George

2 player

G Hankins

No Correlation

0.52

1 player

J Palmer

2 player

J Hogarth

Positive Correlation

0.47

1 player

J Palmer

2 player

M Whitlock

Positive Correlation

0.32

1 player

J Palmer

2 player

P Murray

Weak Positive Correlation

0.48

1 player

J Palmer

2 player

B Allchin

Positive Correlation

0.06

1 player

J Palmer

2 player

Arthur George

No Correlation

1

1 player

J Palmer

2 player

J Palmer

Strong Positive Correlation

0.47

1 player

J Palmer

2 player

A Roberts

Positive Correlation

0.2

1 player

J Palmer

2 player

B Whitlock

Weak Positive Correlation

0.53

1 player

J Palmer

2 player

G Hankins

Positive Correlation

0.48

1 player

A Roberts

2 player

J Hogarth

Positive Correlation

0.26

1 player

A Roberts

2 player

M Whitlock

Weak Positive Correlation

0.2

1 player

A Roberts

2 player

P Murray

Weak Positive Correlation

0.6

1 player

A Roberts

2 player

B Allchin

Positive Correlation

0.18

1 player

A Roberts

2 player

Arthur George

No Correlation

0.47

1 player

A Roberts

2 player

J Palmer

Positive Correlation

1

1 player

A Roberts

2 player

A Roberts

Strong Positive Correlation

0.77

1 player

A Roberts

2 player

B Whitlock

Positive Correlation

0.52

1 player

A Roberts

2 player

G Hankins

Positive Correlation

0.92

1 player

B Whitlock

2 player

J Hogarth

Strong Positive Correlation

0.1

1 player

B Whitlock

2 player

M Whitlock

No Correlation

0.47

1 player

B Whitlock

2 player

P Murray

Positive Correlation

0.6

1 player

B Whitlock

2 player

B Allchin

Positive Correlation

0.5

1 player

B Whitlock

2 player

Arthur George

Positive Correlation

0.2

1 player

B Whitlock

2 player

J Palmer

Weak Positive Correlation

0.77

1 player

B Whitlock

2 player

A Roberts

Positive Correlation

1

1 player

B Whitlock

2 player

B Whitlock

Strong Positive Correlation

0.67

1 player

B Whitlock

2 player

G Hankins

Positive Correlation

0.48

1 player

G Hankins

2 player

J Hogarth

Positive Correlation

0.13

1 player

G Hankins

2 player

M Whitlock

No Correlation

0.2

1 player

G Hankins

2 player

P Murray

Weak Positive Correlation

0.08

1 player

G Hankins

2 player

B Allchin

No Correlation

0.05

1 player

G Hankins

2 player

Arthur George

No Correlation

0.53

1 player

G Hankins

2 player

J Palmer

Positive Correlation

0.52

1 player

G Hankins

2 player

A Roberts

Positive Correlation

0.67

1 player

G Hankins

2 player

B Whitlock

Positive Correlation

1

1 player

G Hankins

2 player

G Hankins

Strong Positive Correlation

Strong Positive Correlation

No Correlation

Strong Negative Correlation

Pick **J Hogarth** and **G Clarke** together

Strong Positive Correlation

Pick **J Hogarth** and **Arthur George** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **J Hogarth** and **B Whitlock** together

Strong Positive Correlation

Pick **G Clarke** and **J Palmer** together

Strong Positive Correlation

Pick **G Clarke** and **A Roberts** together

Strong Positive Correlation

Pick **G Clarke** and **G Farquhar** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **G Clarke** and **B Whitlock** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **G Clarke** and **G Hankins** together

Strong Positive Correlation

Pick **M Whitlock** and **B Allchin** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **B Allchin** and **A Roberts** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **B Allchin** and **B Whitlock** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **J Palmer** and **G Farquhar** together

Strong Positive Correlation

Pick **A Roberts** and **B Whitlock** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **G Farquhar** and **G Hankins** together

Strong Positive Correlation

Pick **B Whitlock** and **G Hankins** together

Positive Correlation

Don’t Pick **M Whitlock** and **G Farquhar** together

Strong Negative Correlation

Don’t Pick **B Allchin** and **G Farquhar** together

Negative Correlation

Don’t Pick **Arthur George** and **G Farquhar** together

Negative Correlation

Similar Perfomance

B Whitlock 0.67

J Palmer 0.53

A Roberts 0.52

J Hogarth 0.48

P Murray 0.2

M Whitlock 0.13

B Allchin 0.08

Arthur George 0.05

Similar Perfomance

B Allchin 0.67

J Palmer 0.47

P Murray 0.32

J Hogarth 0.31

A Roberts 0.26

Arthur George 0.24

G Hankins 0.13

B Whitlock 0.1

Opposite Perfomance

Similar Perfomance

J Hogarth 0.49

B Whitlock 0.47

Arthur George 0.41

B Allchin 0.35

M Whitlock 0.32

J Palmer 0.32

A Roberts 0.2

G Hankins 0.2

Opposite Perfomance

Similar Perfomance

J Hogarth 0.65

B Whitlock 0.5

P Murray 0.41

M Whitlock 0.24

A Roberts 0.18

B Allchin 0.15

J Palmer 0.06

G Hankins 0.05

Opposite Perfomance

Similar Perfomance

B Whitlock 0.92

Arthur George 0.65

J Palmer 0.52

P Murray 0.49

A Roberts 0.48

G Hankins 0.48

M Whitlock 0.31

B Allchin 0.26

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

DT Smith AR TW

D Jayalath BOW TW

F Freeman BOW TW

S Huggett BOW TW

H Youds BOW TW

S Shah AR TW

L Cormie AR TW

W Freeman BAT TW

S Smith WK TW

Z Webb AR TW

DT Smith

D Jayalath

F Freeman

S Huggett

H Youds

S Shah

L Cormie

W Freeman

S Smith

Z Webb

1

1 player

DT Smith

2 player

DT Smith

Strong Positive Correlation

0.2

1 player

DT Smith

2 player

D Jayalath

Weak Positive Correlation

0.08

1 player

DT Smith

2 player

F Freeman

No Correlation

0.47

1 player

DT Smith

2 player

S Huggett

Positive Correlation

0

1 player

DT Smith

2 player

H Youds

No Correlation

0.42

1 player

DT Smith

2 player

L Cormie

Positive Correlation

0.5

1 player

DT Smith

2 player

S Smith

Positive Correlation

-0.18

1 player

DT Smith

2 player

Z Webb

No Correlation

0.2

1 player

D Jayalath

2 player

DT Smith

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

D Jayalath

2 player

D Jayalath

Strong Positive Correlation

0.18

1 player

D Jayalath

2 player

F Freeman

No Correlation

0.2

1 player

D Jayalath

2 player

S Huggett

Weak Positive Correlation

0.18

1 player

D Jayalath

2 player

H Youds

No Correlation

0.38

1 player

D Jayalath

2 player

L Cormie

Weak Positive Correlation

0.25

1 player

D Jayalath

2 player

S Smith

Weak Positive Correlation

0.33

1 player

D Jayalath

2 player

Z Webb

Weak Positive Correlation

0.08

1 player

F Freeman

2 player

DT Smith

No Correlation

0.18

1 player

F Freeman

2 player

D Jayalath

No Correlation

1

1 player

F Freeman

2 player

F Freeman

Strong Positive Correlation

0.23

1 player

F Freeman

2 player

S Huggett

Weak Positive Correlation

0.26

1 player

F Freeman

2 player

H Youds

Weak Positive Correlation

0.4

1 player

F Freeman

2 player

L Cormie

Positive Correlation

0.25

1 player

F Freeman

2 player

S Smith

Weak Positive Correlation

0.37

1 player

F Freeman

2 player

Z Webb

Weak Positive Correlation

0.47

1 player

S Huggett

2 player

DT Smith

Positive Correlation

0.2

1 player

S Huggett

2 player

D Jayalath

Weak Positive Correlation

0.23

1 player

S Huggett

2 player

F Freeman

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

S Huggett

2 player

S Huggett

Strong Positive Correlation

0.7

1 player

S Huggett

2 player

H Youds

Positive Correlation

0.67

1 player

S Huggett

2 player

L Cormie

Positive Correlation

0.5

1 player

S Huggett

2 player

S Smith

Positive Correlation

0.27

1 player

S Huggett

2 player

Z Webb

Weak Positive Correlation

0

1 player

H Youds

2 player

DT Smith

No Correlation

0.18

1 player

H Youds

2 player

D Jayalath

No Correlation

0.26

1 player

H Youds

2 player

F Freeman

Weak Positive Correlation

0.7

1 player

H Youds

2 player

S Huggett

Positive Correlation

1

1 player

H Youds

2 player

H Youds

Strong Positive Correlation

0.34

1 player

H Youds

2 player

L Cormie

Weak Positive Correlation

0.54

1 player

H Youds

2 player

S Smith

Positive Correlation

0.25

1 player

H Youds

2 player

Z Webb

Weak Positive Correlation

0.42

1 player

L Cormie

2 player

DT Smith

Positive Correlation

0.38

1 player

L Cormie

2 player

D Jayalath

Weak Positive Correlation

0.4

1 player

L Cormie

2 player

F Freeman

Positive Correlation

0.67

1 player

L Cormie

2 player

S Huggett

Positive Correlation

0.34

1 player

L Cormie

2 player

H Youds

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

L Cormie

2 player

L Cormie

Strong Positive Correlation

0.16

1 player

L Cormie

2 player

S Smith

No Correlation

-0.18

1 player

L Cormie

2 player

Z Webb

No Correlation

0.5

1 player

S Smith

2 player

DT Smith

Positive Correlation

0.25

1 player

S Smith

2 player

D Jayalath

Weak Positive Correlation

0.25

1 player

S Smith

2 player

F Freeman

Weak Positive Correlation

0.5

1 player

S Smith

2 player

S Huggett

Positive Correlation

0.54

1 player

S Smith

2 player

H Youds

Positive Correlation

0.16

1 player

S Smith

2 player

L Cormie

No Correlation

1

1 player

S Smith

2 player

S Smith

Strong Positive Correlation

0.39

1 player

S Smith

2 player

Z Webb

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.18

1 player

Z Webb

2 player

DT Smith

No Correlation

0.33

1 player

Z Webb

2 player

D Jayalath

Weak Positive Correlation

0.37

1 player

Z Webb

2 player

F Freeman

Weak Positive Correlation

0.27

1 player

Z Webb

2 player

S Huggett

Weak Positive Correlation

0.25

1 player

Z Webb

2 player

H Youds

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.18

1 player

Z Webb

2 player

L Cormie

No Correlation

0.39

1 player

Z Webb

2 player

S Smith

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

Z Webb

2 player

Z Webb

Strong Positive Correlation

Strong Positive Correlation

No Correlation

Strong Negative Correlation

Pick **DT Smith** and **S Shah** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **D Jayalath** and **S Shah** together

Strong Positive Correlation

Pick **S Huggett** and **H Youds** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **S Huggett** and **S Shah** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **S Huggett** and **L Cormie** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **S Shah** and **L Cormie** together

Strong Positive Correlation

Similar Perfomance

L Cormie 0.4

Z Webb 0.37

H Youds 0.26

S Smith 0.25

S Huggett 0.23

D Jayalath 0.18

DT Smith 0.08

Opposite Perfomance

Similar Perfomance

S Smith 0.5

S Huggett 0.47

L Cormie 0.42

D Jayalath 0.2

F Freeman 0.08

Opposite Perfomance

Z Webb -0.18

Similar Perfomance

H Youds 0.54

DT Smith 0.5

S Huggett 0.5

Z Webb 0.39

D Jayalath 0.25

F Freeman 0.25

L Cormie 0.16

Similar Perfomance

S Smith 0.39

F Freeman 0.37

D Jayalath 0.33

S Huggett 0.27

H Youds 0.25

Opposite Perfomance

DT Smith -0.18

L Cormie -0.18

Similar Perfomance

S Huggett 0.67

DT Smith 0.42

F Freeman 0.4

D Jayalath 0.38

H Youds 0.34

S Smith 0.16

Opposite Perfomance

Z Webb -0.18

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

J Hogarth AR HOR

G Clarke BAT HOR

M Whitlock BOW HOR

P Murray WK HOR

B Allchin BOW HOR

Arthur George BOW HOR

J Palmer WK HOR

A Roberts BAT HOR

G Farquhar BAT HOR

B Whitlock BOW HOR

G Hankins BAT HOR

J Hogarth

G Clarke

M Whitlock

P Murray

B Allchin

Arthur George

J Palmer

A Roberts

G Farquhar

B Whitlock

G Hankins

1

1 player

J Hogarth

2 player

J Hogarth

Strong Positive Correlation

0.11

1 player

J Hogarth

2 player

M Whitlock

No Correlation

0.25

1 player

J Hogarth

2 player

P Murray

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.14

1 player

J Hogarth

2 player

B Allchin

No Correlation

0.5

1 player

J Hogarth

2 player

Arthur George

Positive Correlation

-0.33

1 player

J Hogarth

2 player

J Palmer

Weak Negative Correlation

0

1 player

J Hogarth

2 player

A Roberts

No Correlation

-0.23

1 player

J Hogarth

2 player

B Whitlock

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.42

1 player

J Hogarth

2 player

G Hankins

Negative Correlation

0.11

1 player

M Whitlock

2 player

J Hogarth

No Correlation

1

1 player

M Whitlock

2 player

M Whitlock

Strong Positive Correlation

0

1 player

M Whitlock

2 player

P Murray

No Correlation

0.71

1 player

M Whitlock

2 player

B Allchin

Positive Correlation

-0.11

1 player

M Whitlock

2 player

Arthur George

No Correlation

0.33

1 player

M Whitlock

2 player

J Palmer

Weak Positive Correlation

0

1 player

M Whitlock

2 player

A Roberts

No Correlation

-0.7

1 player

M Whitlock

2 player

B Whitlock

Negative Correlation

-0.17

1 player

M Whitlock

2 player

G Hankins

No Correlation

0.25

1 player

P Murray

2 player

J Hogarth

Weak Positive Correlation

0

1 player

P Murray

2 player

M Whitlock

No Correlation

1

1 player

P Murray

2 player

P Murray

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.33

1 player

P Murray

2 player

B Allchin

Weak Negative Correlation

0.44

1 player

P Murray

2 player

Arthur George

Positive Correlation

-0.42

1 player

P Murray

2 player

J Palmer

Negative Correlation

0.7

1 player

P Murray

2 player

A Roberts

Positive Correlation

0

1 player

P Murray

2 player

B Whitlock

No Correlation

0.22

1 player

P Murray

2 player

G Hankins

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.14

1 player

B Allchin

2 player

J Hogarth

No Correlation

0.71

1 player

B Allchin

2 player

M Whitlock

Positive Correlation

-0.33

1 player

B Allchin

2 player

P Murray

Weak Negative Correlation

1

1 player

B Allchin

2 player

B Allchin

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.67

1 player

B Allchin

2 player

Arthur George

Negative Correlation

0.42

1 player

B Allchin

2 player

J Palmer

Positive Correlation

0.23

1 player

B Allchin

2 player

A Roberts

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.7

1 player

B Allchin

2 player

B Whitlock

Negative Correlation

-0.14

1 player

B Allchin

2 player

G Hankins

No Correlation

0.5

1 player

Arthur George

2 player

J Hogarth

Positive Correlation

-0.11

1 player

Arthur George

2 player

M Whitlock

No Correlation

0.44

1 player

Arthur George

2 player

P Murray

Positive Correlation

-0.67

1 player

Arthur George

2 player

B Allchin

Negative Correlation

1

1 player

Arthur George

2 player

Arthur George

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.7

1 player

Arthur George

2 player

J Palmer

Negative Correlation

0.7

1 player

Arthur George

2 player

A Roberts

Positive Correlation

0

1 player

Arthur George

2 player

B Whitlock

No Correlation

-0.33

1 player

Arthur George

2 player

G Hankins

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.33

1 player

J Palmer

2 player

J Hogarth

Weak Negative Correlation

0.33

1 player

J Palmer

2 player

M Whitlock

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.42

1 player

J Palmer

2 player

P Murray

Negative Correlation

0.42

1 player

J Palmer

2 player

B Allchin

Positive Correlation

-0.7

1 player

J Palmer

2 player

Arthur George

Negative Correlation

1

1 player

J Palmer

2 player

J Palmer

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.23

1 player

J Palmer

2 player

A Roberts

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.23

1 player

J Palmer

2 player

B Whitlock

Weak Negative Correlation

0.23

1 player

J Palmer

2 player

G Hankins

Weak Positive Correlation

0

1 player

A Roberts

2 player

J Hogarth

No Correlation

0

1 player

A Roberts

2 player

M Whitlock

No Correlation

0.7

1 player

A Roberts

2 player

P Murray

Positive Correlation

0.23

1 player

A Roberts

2 player

B Allchin

Weak Positive Correlation

0.7

1 player

A Roberts

2 player

Arthur George

Positive Correlation

-0.23

1 player

A Roberts

2 player

J Palmer

Weak Negative Correlation

1

1 player

A Roberts

2 player

A Roberts

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.23

1 player

A Roberts

2 player

B Whitlock

Weak Negative Correlation

0.23

1 player

A Roberts

2 player

G Hankins

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.23

1 player

B Whitlock

2 player

J Hogarth

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.7

1 player

B Whitlock

2 player

M Whitlock

Negative Correlation

0

1 player

B Whitlock

2 player

P Murray

No Correlation

-0.7

1 player

B Whitlock

2 player

B Allchin

Negative Correlation

0

1 player

B Whitlock

2 player

Arthur George

No Correlation

-0.23

1 player

B Whitlock

2 player

J Palmer

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.23

1 player

B Whitlock

2 player

A Roberts

Weak Negative Correlation

1

1 player

B Whitlock

2 player

B Whitlock

Strong Positive Correlation

0.23

1 player

B Whitlock

2 player

G Hankins

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.42

1 player

G Hankins

2 player

J Hogarth

Negative Correlation

-0.17

1 player

G Hankins

2 player

M Whitlock

No Correlation

0.22

1 player

G Hankins

2 player

P Murray

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.14

1 player

G Hankins

2 player

B Allchin

No Correlation

-0.33

1 player

G Hankins

2 player

Arthur George

Weak Negative Correlation

0.23

1 player

G Hankins

2 player

J Palmer

Weak Positive Correlation

0.23

1 player

G Hankins

2 player

A Roberts

Weak Positive Correlation

0.23

1 player

G Hankins

2 player

B Whitlock

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

G Hankins

2 player

G Hankins

Strong Positive Correlation

Strong Positive Correlation

No Correlation

Strong Negative Correlation

Pick **P Murray** and **A Roberts** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **Arthur George** and **A Roberts** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **G Farquhar** and **B Whitlock** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **J Hogarth** and **G Farquhar** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **G Clarke** and **B Allchin** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **M Whitlock** and **B Whitlock** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **P Murray** and **G Farquhar** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **B Allchin** and **Arthur George** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **Arthur George** and **J Palmer** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **A Roberts** and **G Farquhar** together

Negative Correlation

Similar Perfomance

A Roberts 0.23

J Palmer 0.23

B Whitlock 0.23

P Murray 0.22

Opposite Perfomance

J Hogarth -0.42

Arthur George -0.33

M Whitlock -0.17

B Allchin -0.14

Similar Perfomance

A Roberts 0.7

Arthur George 0.44

J Hogarth 0.25

G Hankins 0.22

Opposite Perfomance

J Palmer -0.42

B Allchin -0.33

Similar Perfomance

B Allchin 0.71

J Palmer 0.33

J Hogarth 0.11

Opposite Perfomance

B Whitlock -0.7

G Hankins -0.17

Arthur George -0.11

Similar Perfomance

A Roberts 0.7

J Hogarth 0.5

P Murray 0.44

Opposite Perfomance

J Palmer -0.7

B Allchin -0.67

G Hankins -0.33

M Whitlock -0.11

Similar Perfomance

Arthur George 0.5

P Murray 0.25

M Whitlock 0.11

Opposite Perfomance

G Hankins -0.42

J Palmer -0.33

B Whitlock -0.23

B Allchin -0.14

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

DT Smith AR TW

D Jayalath BOW TW

F Freeman BOW TW

S Huggett BOW TW

H Youds BOW TW

S Shah AR TW

L Cormie AR TW

W Freeman BAT TW

S Smith WK TW

Z Webb AR TW

DT Smith

D Jayalath

F Freeman

S Huggett

H Youds

S Shah

L Cormie

W Freeman

S Smith

Z Webb

1

1 player

DT Smith

2 player

DT Smith

Strong Positive Correlation

0.7

1 player

DT Smith

2 player

D Jayalath

Positive Correlation

0.14

1 player

DT Smith

2 player

F Freeman

No Correlation

-0.7

1 player

DT Smith

2 player

S Huggett

Negative Correlation

-0.42

1 player

DT Smith

2 player

H Youds

Negative Correlation

0.14

1 player

DT Smith

2 player

L Cormie

No Correlation

-0.14

1 player

DT Smith

2 player

S Smith

No Correlation

-0.35

1 player

DT Smith

2 player

Z Webb

Weak Negative Correlation

0.7

1 player

D Jayalath

2 player

DT Smith

Positive Correlation

1

1 player

D Jayalath

2 player

D Jayalath

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.23

1 player

D Jayalath

2 player

F Freeman

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.7

1 player

D Jayalath

2 player

S Huggett

Negative Correlation

-0.23

1 player

D Jayalath

2 player

H Youds

Weak Negative Correlation

0.7

1 player

D Jayalath

2 player

L Cormie

Positive Correlation

-0.23

1 player

D Jayalath

2 player

S Smith

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.7

1 player

D Jayalath

2 player

Z Webb

Negative Correlation

0.14

1 player

F Freeman

2 player

DT Smith

No Correlation

-0.23

1 player

F Freeman

2 player

D Jayalath

Weak Negative Correlation

1

1 player

F Freeman

2 player

F Freeman

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.7

1 player

F Freeman

2 player

S Huggett

Negative Correlation

-0.42

1 player

F Freeman

2 player

H Youds

Negative Correlation

-0.42

1 player

F Freeman

2 player

L Cormie

Negative Correlation

0

1 player

F Freeman

2 player

S Smith

No Correlation

0.14

1 player

F Freeman

2 player

Z Webb

No Correlation

-0.7

1 player

S Huggett

2 player

DT Smith

Negative Correlation

-0.7

1 player

S Huggett

2 player

D Jayalath

Negative Correlation

-0.7

1 player

S Huggett

2 player

F Freeman

Negative Correlation

1

1 player

S Huggett

2 player

S Huggett

Strong Positive Correlation

0.7

1 player

S Huggett

2 player

H Youds

Positive Correlation

0.23

1 player

S Huggett

2 player

L Cormie

Weak Positive Correlation

0.23

1 player

S Huggett

2 player

S Smith

Weak Positive Correlation

0.23

1 player

S Huggett

2 player

Z Webb

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.42

1 player

H Youds

2 player

DT Smith

Negative Correlation

-0.23

1 player

H Youds

2 player

D Jayalath

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.42

1 player

H Youds

2 player

F Freeman

Negative Correlation

0.7

1 player

H Youds

2 player

S Huggett

Positive Correlation

1

1 player

H Youds

2 player

H Youds

Strong Positive Correlation

0.14

1 player

H Youds

2 player

L Cormie

No Correlation

-0.14

1 player

H Youds

2 player

S Smith

No Correlation

0

1 player

H Youds

2 player

Z Webb

No Correlation

0.14

1 player

L Cormie

2 player

DT Smith

No Correlation

0.7

1 player

L Cormie

2 player

D Jayalath

Positive Correlation

-0.42

1 player

L Cormie

2 player

F Freeman

Negative Correlation

0.23

1 player

L Cormie

2 player

S Huggett

Weak Positive Correlation

0.14

1 player

L Cormie

2 player

H Youds

No Correlation

1

1 player

L Cormie

2 player

L Cormie

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.14

1 player

L Cormie

2 player

S Smith

No Correlation

-0.35

1 player

L Cormie

2 player

Z Webb

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.14

1 player

S Smith

2 player

DT Smith

No Correlation

-0.23

1 player

S Smith

2 player

D Jayalath

Weak Negative Correlation

0

1 player

S Smith

2 player

F Freeman

No Correlation

0.23

1 player

S Smith

2 player

S Huggett

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.14

1 player

S Smith

2 player

H Youds

No Correlation

-0.14

1 player

S Smith

2 player

L Cormie

No Correlation

1

1 player

S Smith

2 player

S Smith

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.14

1 player

S Smith

2 player

Z Webb

No Correlation

-0.35

1 player

Z Webb

2 player

DT Smith

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.7

1 player

Z Webb

2 player

D Jayalath

Negative Correlation

0.14

1 player

Z Webb

2 player

F Freeman

No Correlation

0.23

1 player

Z Webb

2 player

S Huggett

Weak Positive Correlation

0

1 player

Z Webb

2 player

H Youds

No Correlation

-0.35

1 player

Z Webb

2 player

L Cormie

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.14

1 player

Z Webb

2 player

S Smith

No Correlation

1

1 player

Z Webb

2 player

Z Webb

Strong Positive Correlation

Strong Positive Correlation

No Correlation

Strong Negative Correlation

Pick **DT Smith** and **D Jayalath** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **D Jayalath** and **L Cormie** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **S Huggett** and **W Freeman** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **H Youds** and **W Freeman** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **DT Smith** and **S Huggett** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **D Jayalath** and **S Huggett** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **D Jayalath** and **Z Webb** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **F Freeman** and **S Huggett** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **S Shah** and **W Freeman** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **S Shah** and **Z Webb** together

Negative Correlation

Similar Perfomance

DT Smith 0.14

Z Webb 0.14

Opposite Perfomance

S Huggett -0.7

H Youds -0.42

L Cormie -0.42

D Jayalath -0.23

Similar Perfomance

S Huggett 0.23

Opposite Perfomance

D Jayalath -0.23

DT Smith -0.14

H Youds -0.14

L Cormie -0.14

Z Webb -0.14

Similar Perfomance

D Jayalath 0.7

F Freeman 0.14

L Cormie 0.14

Opposite Perfomance

S Huggett -0.7

H Youds -0.42

Z Webb -0.35

S Smith -0.14

Similar Perfomance

DT Smith 0.7

L Cormie 0.7

Opposite Perfomance

S Huggett -0.7

Z Webb -0.7

F Freeman -0.23

H Youds -0.23

S Smith -0.23

Similar Perfomance

D Jayalath 0.7

S Huggett 0.23

DT Smith 0.14

H Youds 0.14

Opposite Perfomance

F Freeman -0.42

Z Webb -0.35

S Smith -0.14