KET 21 Jun 11:00 pm ESS

Lineup Out

St Lawrence Ground
English T20 Blast

Best Player Combinations For
KET vs ESS

How it Works?

This guide is super useful for identifying player combinations that are likely to score big. Use the filters to identify the best player combinations according to specific match scenarios.

Player correlate positively

Both players generally perform similarly when picked together. They either score high together or score low together. Maximise FPts by picking players that correlate positively with top players.

Player correlate negatively

Both players generally perform in an opposite manner. If one player scores high, the other usually scores low. Avoid picking players that correlate negatively with top player

Show Player Combinations on the basis of:

Best KET Player Combinations

Best KET Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad
X Bartlett BOW KET
Z Crawley BAT KET
J Evison AR KET
M Parkinson BOW KET
B Swanepoel AR KET
D Bell-Drummond BAT KET
M O'Riordan BAT KET
H Finch WK KET
N Gilchrist BOW KET
T Muyeye BAT KET
S Billings WK KET
X Bartlett
Z Crawley
J Evison
M Parkinson
B Swanepoel
D Bell-Drummond
M O'Riordan
H Finch
N Gilchrist
T Muyeye
S Billings
1
1 player
X Bartlett
2 player
X Bartlett
Strong Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
X Bartlett
2 player
Z Crawley
Weak Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
X Bartlett
2 player
J Evison
No Correlation
0.27
1 player
X Bartlett
2 player
M Parkinson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.52
1 player
X Bartlett
2 player
B Swanepoel
Positive Correlation
0.62
1 player
X Bartlett
2 player
D Bell-Drummond
Positive Correlation
0.49
1 player
X Bartlett
2 player
M O'Riordan
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
X Bartlett
2 player
H Finch
Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
X Bartlett
2 player
N Gilchrist
Weak Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
X Bartlett
2 player
T Muyeye
Positive Correlation
-0.09
1 player
X Bartlett
2 player
S Billings
No Correlation
0.32
1 player
Z Crawley
2 player
X Bartlett
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
Z Crawley
2 player
Z Crawley
Strong Positive Correlation
0.59
1 player
Z Crawley
2 player
J Evison
Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
Z Crawley
2 player
M Parkinson
Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
Z Crawley
2 player
B Swanepoel
Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
Z Crawley
2 player
D Bell-Drummond
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
Z Crawley
2 player
M O'Riordan
Weak Positive Correlation
0.55
1 player
Z Crawley
2 player
H Finch
Positive Correlation
-0.13
1 player
Z Crawley
2 player
N Gilchrist
No Correlation
0.68
1 player
Z Crawley
2 player
T Muyeye
Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
Z Crawley
2 player
S Billings
No Correlation
0.15
1 player
J Evison
2 player
X Bartlett
No Correlation
0.59
1 player
J Evison
2 player
Z Crawley
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
J Evison
2 player
J Evison
Strong Positive Correlation
0.19
1 player
J Evison
2 player
M Parkinson
No Correlation
0.17
1 player
J Evison
2 player
B Swanepoel
No Correlation
0.24
1 player
J Evison
2 player
D Bell-Drummond
Weak Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
J Evison
2 player
M O'Riordan
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
J Evison
2 player
H Finch
Weak Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
J Evison
2 player
N Gilchrist
Weak Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
J Evison
2 player
T Muyeye
Weak Positive Correlation
0.45
1 player
J Evison
2 player
S Billings
Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
M Parkinson
2 player
X Bartlett
Weak Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
M Parkinson
2 player
Z Crawley
Positive Correlation
0.19
1 player
M Parkinson
2 player
J Evison
No Correlation
1
1 player
M Parkinson
2 player
M Parkinson
Strong Positive Correlation
0.03
1 player
M Parkinson
2 player
B Swanepoel
No Correlation
0.13
1 player
M Parkinson
2 player
D Bell-Drummond
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
M Parkinson
2 player
M O'Riordan
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
M Parkinson
2 player
H Finch
Weak Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
M Parkinson
2 player
N Gilchrist
No Correlation
0.19
1 player
M Parkinson
2 player
T Muyeye
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
M Parkinson
2 player
S Billings
Weak Positive Correlation
0.52
1 player
B Swanepoel
2 player
X Bartlett
Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
B Swanepoel
2 player
Z Crawley
Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
B Swanepoel
2 player
J Evison
No Correlation
0.03
1 player
B Swanepoel
2 player
M Parkinson
No Correlation
1
1 player
B Swanepoel
2 player
B Swanepoel
Strong Positive Correlation
0.48
1 player
B Swanepoel
2 player
D Bell-Drummond
Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
B Swanepoel
2 player
M O'Riordan
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
B Swanepoel
2 player
H Finch
Weak Positive Correlation
-1
1 player
B Swanepoel
2 player
N Gilchrist
Strong Negative Correlation
0.48
1 player
B Swanepoel
2 player
T Muyeye
Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
B Swanepoel
2 player
S Billings
Weak Negative Correlation
0.62
1 player
D Bell-Drummond
2 player
X Bartlett
Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
D Bell-Drummond
2 player
Z Crawley
Weak Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
D Bell-Drummond
2 player
J Evison
Weak Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
D Bell-Drummond
2 player
M Parkinson
No Correlation
0.48
1 player
D Bell-Drummond
2 player
B Swanepoel
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
D Bell-Drummond
2 player
D Bell-Drummond
Strong Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
D Bell-Drummond
2 player
M O'Riordan
Weak Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
D Bell-Drummond
2 player
H Finch
Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
D Bell-Drummond
2 player
N Gilchrist
No Correlation
0.06
1 player
D Bell-Drummond
2 player
T Muyeye
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
D Bell-Drummond
2 player
S Billings
No Correlation
0.49
1 player
M O'Riordan
2 player
X Bartlett
Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
M O'Riordan
2 player
Z Crawley
Weak Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
M O'Riordan
2 player
J Evison
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
M O'Riordan
2 player
M Parkinson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
M O'Riordan
2 player
B Swanepoel
Weak Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
M O'Riordan
2 player
D Bell-Drummond
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M O'Riordan
2 player
M O'Riordan
Strong Positive Correlation
0.37
1 player
M O'Riordan
2 player
H Finch
Weak Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
M O'Riordan
2 player
N Gilchrist
Weak Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
M O'Riordan
2 player
T Muyeye
Weak Positive Correlation
0.02
1 player
M O'Riordan
2 player
S Billings
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
H Finch
2 player
X Bartlett
Positive Correlation
0.55
1 player
H Finch
2 player
Z Crawley
Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
H Finch
2 player
J Evison
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
H Finch
2 player
M Parkinson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
H Finch
2 player
B Swanepoel
Weak Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
H Finch
2 player
D Bell-Drummond
Positive Correlation
0.37
1 player
H Finch
2 player
M O'Riordan
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
H Finch
2 player
H Finch
Strong Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
H Finch
2 player
N Gilchrist
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
H Finch
2 player
T Muyeye
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
H Finch
2 player
S Billings
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
N Gilchrist
2 player
X Bartlett
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.13
1 player
N Gilchrist
2 player
Z Crawley
No Correlation
0.3
1 player
N Gilchrist
2 player
J Evison
Weak Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
N Gilchrist
2 player
M Parkinson
No Correlation
-1
1 player
N Gilchrist
2 player
B Swanepoel
Strong Negative Correlation
0.1
1 player
N Gilchrist
2 player
D Bell-Drummond
No Correlation
0.27
1 player
N Gilchrist
2 player
M O'Riordan
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
N Gilchrist
2 player
H Finch
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
N Gilchrist
2 player
N Gilchrist
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
N Gilchrist
2 player
T Muyeye
No Correlation
0.56
1 player
N Gilchrist
2 player
S Billings
Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
T Muyeye
2 player
X Bartlett
Positive Correlation
0.68
1 player
T Muyeye
2 player
Z Crawley
Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
T Muyeye
2 player
J Evison
Weak Positive Correlation
0.19
1 player
T Muyeye
2 player
M Parkinson
No Correlation
0.48
1 player
T Muyeye
2 player
B Swanepoel
Positive Correlation
0.06
1 player
T Muyeye
2 player
D Bell-Drummond
No Correlation
0.38
1 player
T Muyeye
2 player
M O'Riordan
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
T Muyeye
2 player
H Finch
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
T Muyeye
2 player
N Gilchrist
No Correlation
1
1 player
T Muyeye
2 player
T Muyeye
Strong Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
T Muyeye
2 player
S Billings
No Correlation
-0.09
1 player
S Billings
2 player
X Bartlett
No Correlation
0.1
1 player
S Billings
2 player
Z Crawley
No Correlation
0.45
1 player
S Billings
2 player
J Evison
Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
S Billings
2 player
M Parkinson
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
S Billings
2 player
B Swanepoel
Weak Negative Correlation
0.08
1 player
S Billings
2 player
D Bell-Drummond
No Correlation
0.02
1 player
S Billings
2 player
M O'Riordan
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
S Billings
2 player
H Finch
Weak Positive Correlation
0.56
1 player
S Billings
2 player
N Gilchrist
Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
S Billings
2 player
T Muyeye
No Correlation
1
1 player
S Billings
2 player
S Billings
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick X Bartlett and D Bell-Drummond together
Positive Correlation

Pick X Bartlett and H Finch together
Positive Correlation

Pick Z Crawley and T Muyeye together
Positive Correlation

Pick D Bell-Drummond and H Finch together
Positive Correlation

Don’t Pick B Swanepoel and N Gilchrist together
Strong Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 D Bell-Drummond

BAT
Similar Perfomance
H Finch 0.7
X Bartlett 0.62
B Swanepoel 0.48
Z Crawley 0.3
J Evison 0.24
M O'Riordan 0.24
M Parkinson 0.13
N Gilchrist 0.1
S Billings 0.08
T Muyeye 0.06

2 S Billings

WK
Similar Perfomance
N Gilchrist 0.56
J Evison 0.45
H Finch 0.28
M Parkinson 0.2
Z Crawley 0.1
D Bell-Drummond 0.08
T Muyeye 0.08
M O'Riordan 0.02
Opposite Perfomance
B Swanepoel -0.23
X Bartlett -0.09

3 T Muyeye

BAT
Similar Perfomance
Z Crawley 0.68
B Swanepoel 0.48
X Bartlett 0.4
M O'Riordan 0.38
H Finch 0.28
J Evison 0.22
M Parkinson 0.19
S Billings 0.08
D Bell-Drummond 0.06

4 J Evison

AR
Similar Perfomance
Z Crawley 0.59
S Billings 0.45
H Finch 0.35
M O'Riordan 0.32
N Gilchrist 0.3
D Bell-Drummond 0.24
T Muyeye 0.22
M Parkinson 0.19
B Swanepoel 0.17
X Bartlett 0.15

5 M Parkinson

BOW
Similar Perfomance
Z Crawley 0.4
M O'Riordan 0.35
X Bartlett 0.27
H Finch 0.2
S Billings 0.2
J Evison 0.19
T Muyeye 0.19
D Bell-Drummond 0.13
N Gilchrist 0.13
B Swanepoel 0.03

Best ESS Player Combinations

Best ESS Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad
CW Allison BAT ESS
S Harmer BOW ESS
J Cox BAT ESS
M Pepper WK ESS
P Walter AR ESS
A Beard BOW ESS
B Allison BOW ESS
A Rossington WK ESS
M Critchley AR ESS
D Elgar BAT ESS
L Benkenstein BOW ESS
CW Allison
S Harmer
J Cox
M Pepper
P Walter
A Beard
B Allison
A Rossington
M Critchley
D Elgar
L Benkenstein
1
1 player
CW Allison
2 player
CW Allison
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.02
1 player
CW Allison
2 player
S Harmer
No Correlation
-0.2
1 player
CW Allison
2 player
J Cox
No Correlation
0.05
1 player
CW Allison
2 player
M Pepper
No Correlation
-0.38
1 player
CW Allison
2 player
P Walter
Weak Negative Correlation
0.85
1 player
CW Allison
2 player
A Beard
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.9
1 player
CW Allison
2 player
B Allison
Strong Negative Correlation
-0.18
1 player
CW Allison
2 player
A Rossington
No Correlation
-0.13
1 player
CW Allison
2 player
M Critchley
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
CW Allison
2 player
D Elgar
Weak Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
CW Allison
2 player
L Benkenstein
Positive Correlation
-0.02
1 player
S Harmer
2 player
CW Allison
No Correlation
1
1 player
S Harmer
2 player
S Harmer
Strong Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
S Harmer
2 player
J Cox
Weak Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
S Harmer
2 player
M Pepper
No Correlation
0.04
1 player
S Harmer
2 player
P Walter
No Correlation
0.17
1 player
S Harmer
2 player
A Beard
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
S Harmer
2 player
B Allison
Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
S Harmer
2 player
A Rossington
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
S Harmer
2 player
M Critchley
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.03
1 player
S Harmer
2 player
D Elgar
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
S Harmer
2 player
L Benkenstein
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.2
1 player
J Cox
2 player
CW Allison
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
J Cox
2 player
S Harmer
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
J Cox
2 player
J Cox
Strong Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
J Cox
2 player
M Pepper
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
J Cox
2 player
P Walter
Weak Positive Correlation
0.54
1 player
J Cox
2 player
A Beard
Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
J Cox
2 player
B Allison
No Correlation
0.3
1 player
J Cox
2 player
A Rossington
Weak Positive Correlation
0.37
1 player
J Cox
2 player
M Critchley
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
J Cox
2 player
D Elgar
Weak Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
J Cox
2 player
L Benkenstein
No Correlation
0.05
1 player
M Pepper
2 player
CW Allison
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
M Pepper
2 player
S Harmer
No Correlation
0.09
1 player
M Pepper
2 player
J Cox
No Correlation
1
1 player
M Pepper
2 player
M Pepper
Strong Positive Correlation
0.04
1 player
M Pepper
2 player
P Walter
No Correlation
-0.05
1 player
M Pepper
2 player
A Beard
No Correlation
0.26
1 player
M Pepper
2 player
B Allison
Weak Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
M Pepper
2 player
A Rossington
No Correlation
0.19
1 player
M Pepper
2 player
M Critchley
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
M Pepper
2 player
D Elgar
Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
M Pepper
2 player
L Benkenstein
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.38
1 player
P Walter
2 player
CW Allison
Weak Negative Correlation
0.04
1 player
P Walter
2 player
S Harmer
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
P Walter
2 player
J Cox
Weak Positive Correlation
0.04
1 player
P Walter
2 player
M Pepper
No Correlation
1
1 player
P Walter
2 player
P Walter
Strong Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
P Walter
2 player
A Beard
No Correlation
0.03
1 player
P Walter
2 player
B Allison
No Correlation
0.45
1 player
P Walter
2 player
A Rossington
Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
P Walter
2 player
M Critchley
Weak Positive Correlation
0.02
1 player
P Walter
2 player
D Elgar
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
P Walter
2 player
L Benkenstein
No Correlation
0.85
1 player
A Beard
2 player
CW Allison
Strong Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
A Beard
2 player
S Harmer
No Correlation
0.54
1 player
A Beard
2 player
J Cox
Positive Correlation
-0.05
1 player
A Beard
2 player
M Pepper
No Correlation
0.13
1 player
A Beard
2 player
P Walter
No Correlation
1
1 player
A Beard
2 player
A Beard
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.03
1 player
A Beard
2 player
B Allison
No Correlation
0.3
1 player
A Beard
2 player
A Rossington
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
A Beard
2 player
M Critchley
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
A Beard
2 player
D Elgar
Weak Positive Correlation
0.37
1 player
A Beard
2 player
L Benkenstein
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.9
1 player
B Allison
2 player
CW Allison
Strong Negative Correlation
0.42
1 player
B Allison
2 player
S Harmer
Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
B Allison
2 player
J Cox
No Correlation
0.26
1 player
B Allison
2 player
M Pepper
Weak Positive Correlation
0.03
1 player
B Allison
2 player
P Walter
No Correlation
-0.03
1 player
B Allison
2 player
A Beard
No Correlation
1
1 player
B Allison
2 player
B Allison
Strong Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
B Allison
2 player
A Rossington
Weak Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
B Allison
2 player
M Critchley
Weak Positive Correlation
0.04
1 player
B Allison
2 player
D Elgar
No Correlation
-0.16
1 player
B Allison
2 player
L Benkenstein
No Correlation
-0.18
1 player
A Rossington
2 player
CW Allison
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
A Rossington
2 player
S Harmer
No Correlation
0.3
1 player
A Rossington
2 player
J Cox
Weak Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
A Rossington
2 player
M Pepper
No Correlation
0.45
1 player
A Rossington
2 player
P Walter
Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
A Rossington
2 player
A Beard
Weak Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
A Rossington
2 player
B Allison
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
A Rossington
2 player
A Rossington
Strong Positive Correlation
0.29
1 player
A Rossington
2 player
M Critchley
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
A Rossington
2 player
D Elgar
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
A Rossington
2 player
L Benkenstein
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.13
1 player
M Critchley
2 player
CW Allison
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
M Critchley
2 player
S Harmer
Weak Positive Correlation
0.37
1 player
M Critchley
2 player
J Cox
Weak Positive Correlation
0.19
1 player
M Critchley
2 player
M Pepper
No Correlation
0.24
1 player
M Critchley
2 player
P Walter
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
M Critchley
2 player
A Beard
No Correlation
0.21
1 player
M Critchley
2 player
B Allison
Weak Positive Correlation
0.29
1 player
M Critchley
2 player
A Rossington
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M Critchley
2 player
M Critchley
Strong Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
M Critchley
2 player
D Elgar
No Correlation
0.45
1 player
M Critchley
2 player
L Benkenstein
Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
D Elgar
2 player
CW Allison
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.03
1 player
D Elgar
2 player
S Harmer
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
D Elgar
2 player
J Cox
Weak Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
D Elgar
2 player
M Pepper
Positive Correlation
0.02
1 player
D Elgar
2 player
P Walter
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
D Elgar
2 player
A Beard
Weak Positive Correlation
0.04
1 player
D Elgar
2 player
B Allison
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
D Elgar
2 player
A Rossington
Weak Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
D Elgar
2 player
M Critchley
No Correlation
1
1 player
D Elgar
2 player
D Elgar
Strong Positive Correlation
0.04
1 player
D Elgar
2 player
L Benkenstein
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
L Benkenstein
2 player
CW Allison
Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
L Benkenstein
2 player
S Harmer
Weak Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
L Benkenstein
2 player
J Cox
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
L Benkenstein
2 player
M Pepper
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
L Benkenstein
2 player
P Walter
No Correlation
0.37
1 player
L Benkenstein
2 player
A Beard
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.16
1 player
L Benkenstein
2 player
B Allison
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
L Benkenstein
2 player
A Rossington
Weak Positive Correlation
0.45
1 player
L Benkenstein
2 player
M Critchley
Positive Correlation
0.04
1 player
L Benkenstein
2 player
D Elgar
No Correlation
1
1 player
L Benkenstein
2 player
L Benkenstein
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick CW Allison and A Beard together
Strong Positive Correlation

Pick CW Allison and L Benkenstein together
Positive Correlation

Don’t pick CW Allison and B Allison in the same lineup
Strong Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 M Critchley

AR
Similar Perfomance
L Benkenstein 0.45
J Cox 0.37
S Harmer 0.35
A Rossington 0.29
P Walter 0.24
B Allison 0.21
M Pepper 0.19
A Beard 0.14
D Elgar 0.08
Opposite Perfomance
CW Allison -0.13

2 P Walter

AR
Similar Perfomance
A Rossington 0.45
J Cox 0.35
M Critchley 0.24
L Benkenstein 0.14
A Beard 0.13
S Harmer 0.04
M Pepper 0.04
B Allison 0.03
D Elgar 0.02
Opposite Perfomance
CW Allison -0.38

3 M Pepper

WK
Similar Perfomance
D Elgar 0.42
B Allison 0.26
L Benkenstein 0.2
M Critchley 0.19
S Harmer 0.11
A Rossington 0.11
J Cox 0.09
CW Allison 0.05
P Walter 0.04
Opposite Perfomance
A Beard -0.05

4 S Harmer

BOW
Similar Perfomance
B Allison 0.42
M Critchley 0.35
J Cox 0.28
L Benkenstein 0.28
A Beard 0.17
A Rossington 0.14
M Pepper 0.11
P Walter 0.04
Opposite Perfomance
D Elgar -0.03
CW Allison -0.02

5 A Rossington

WK
Similar Perfomance
P Walter 0.45
D Elgar 0.33
J Cox 0.3
A Beard 0.3
M Critchley 0.29
L Benkenstein 0.25
B Allison 0.24
S Harmer 0.14
M Pepper 0.11
Opposite Perfomance
CW Allison -0.18

Best KET Player Combinations

Best KET Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

No data found

No data found

High Performing Players

Best ESS Player Combinations

Best ESS Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad
CW Allison BAT ESS
S Harmer BOW ESS
J Cox BAT ESS
M Pepper WK ESS
P Walter AR ESS
A Beard BOW ESS
B Allison BOW ESS
A Rossington WK ESS
M Critchley AR ESS
D Elgar BAT ESS
L Benkenstein BOW ESS
CW Allison
S Harmer
J Cox
M Pepper
P Walter
A Beard
B Allison
A Rossington
M Critchley
D Elgar
L Benkenstein
1
1 player
CW Allison
2 player
CW Allison
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
CW Allison
2 player
S Harmer
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
CW Allison
2 player
J Cox
Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
CW Allison
2 player
M Pepper
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
CW Allison
2 player
P Walter
Weak Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
CW Allison
2 player
A Beard
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
CW Allison
2 player
B Allison
Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
CW Allison
2 player
A Rossington
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
CW Allison
2 player
M Critchley
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
CW Allison
2 player
D Elgar
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
CW Allison
2 player
L Benkenstein
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
S Harmer
2 player
CW Allison
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
S Harmer
2 player
S Harmer
Strong Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
S Harmer
2 player
J Cox
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
S Harmer
2 player
M Pepper
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
S Harmer
2 player
P Walter
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
S Harmer
2 player
A Beard
Weak Negative Correlation
0.56
1 player
S Harmer
2 player
B Allison
Positive Correlation
0.16
1 player
S Harmer
2 player
A Rossington
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
S Harmer
2 player
M Critchley
No Correlation
-0.27
1 player
S Harmer
2 player
D Elgar
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.56
1 player
S Harmer
2 player
L Benkenstein
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
J Cox
2 player
CW Allison
Negative Correlation
0.11
1 player
J Cox
2 player
S Harmer
No Correlation
1
1 player
J Cox
2 player
J Cox
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
J Cox
2 player
M Pepper
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
J Cox
2 player
P Walter
Weak Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
J Cox
2 player
A Beard
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
J Cox
2 player
B Allison
No Correlation
0
1 player
J Cox
2 player
A Rossington
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
J Cox
2 player
M Critchley
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
J Cox
2 player
D Elgar
No Correlation
-0.5
1 player
J Cox
2 player
L Benkenstein
Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
M Pepper
2 player
CW Allison
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
M Pepper
2 player
S Harmer
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
M Pepper
2 player
J Cox
No Correlation
1
1 player
M Pepper
2 player
M Pepper
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.04
1 player
M Pepper
2 player
P Walter
No Correlation
-0.43
1 player
M Pepper
2 player
A Beard
Negative Correlation
0.27
1 player
M Pepper
2 player
B Allison
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.16
1 player
M Pepper
2 player
A Rossington
No Correlation
-0.19
1 player
M Pepper
2 player
M Critchley
No Correlation
0.43
1 player
M Pepper
2 player
D Elgar
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
M Pepper
2 player
L Benkenstein
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
P Walter
2 player
CW Allison
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
P Walter
2 player
S Harmer
Weak Negative Correlation
0.2
1 player
P Walter
2 player
J Cox
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.04
1 player
P Walter
2 player
M Pepper
No Correlation
1
1 player
P Walter
2 player
P Walter
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.08
1 player
P Walter
2 player
A Beard
No Correlation
-0.4
1 player
P Walter
2 player
B Allison
Weak Negative Correlation
0.3
1 player
P Walter
2 player
A Rossington
Weak Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
P Walter
2 player
M Critchley
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
P Walter
2 player
D Elgar
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
P Walter
2 player
L Benkenstein
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
A Beard
2 player
CW Allison
Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
A Beard
2 player
S Harmer
Weak Negative Correlation
0.43
1 player
A Beard
2 player
J Cox
Positive Correlation
-0.43
1 player
A Beard
2 player
M Pepper
Negative Correlation
-0.08
1 player
A Beard
2 player
P Walter
No Correlation
1
1 player
A Beard
2 player
A Beard
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.11
1 player
A Beard
2 player
B Allison
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
A Beard
2 player
A Rossington
No Correlation
0.07
1 player
A Beard
2 player
M Critchley
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
A Beard
2 player
D Elgar
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Beard
2 player
L Benkenstein
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
B Allison
2 player
CW Allison
Negative Correlation
0.56
1 player
B Allison
2 player
S Harmer
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
B Allison
2 player
J Cox
No Correlation
0.27
1 player
B Allison
2 player
M Pepper
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.4
1 player
B Allison
2 player
P Walter
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.11
1 player
B Allison
2 player
A Beard
No Correlation
1
1 player
B Allison
2 player
B Allison
Strong Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
B Allison
2 player
A Rossington
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
B Allison
2 player
M Critchley
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
B Allison
2 player
D Elgar
No Correlation
-0.78
1 player
B Allison
2 player
L Benkenstein
Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
A Rossington
2 player
CW Allison
Weak Negative Correlation
0.16
1 player
A Rossington
2 player
S Harmer
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Rossington
2 player
J Cox
No Correlation
-0.16
1 player
A Rossington
2 player
M Pepper
No Correlation
0.3
1 player
A Rossington
2 player
P Walter
Weak Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
A Rossington
2 player
A Beard
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
A Rossington
2 player
B Allison
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
A Rossington
2 player
A Rossington
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
A Rossington
2 player
M Critchley
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
A Rossington
2 player
D Elgar
No Correlation
-0.5
1 player
A Rossington
2 player
L Benkenstein
Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
M Critchley
2 player
CW Allison
Weak Negative Correlation
0.08
1 player
M Critchley
2 player
S Harmer
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
M Critchley
2 player
J Cox
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.19
1 player
M Critchley
2 player
M Pepper
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
M Critchley
2 player
P Walter
No Correlation
0.07
1 player
M Critchley
2 player
A Beard
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
M Critchley
2 player
B Allison
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
M Critchley
2 player
A Rossington
No Correlation
1
1 player
M Critchley
2 player
M Critchley
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
M Critchley
2 player
D Elgar
No Correlation
-0.08
1 player
M Critchley
2 player
L Benkenstein
No Correlation
0
1 player
D Elgar
2 player
CW Allison
No Correlation
-0.27
1 player
D Elgar
2 player
S Harmer
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
D Elgar
2 player
J Cox
No Correlation
0.43
1 player
D Elgar
2 player
M Pepper
Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
D Elgar
2 player
P Walter
Weak Negative Correlation
0.11
1 player
D Elgar
2 player
A Beard
No Correlation
0
1 player
D Elgar
2 player
B Allison
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
D Elgar
2 player
A Rossington
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
D Elgar
2 player
M Critchley
No Correlation
1
1 player
D Elgar
2 player
D Elgar
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
D Elgar
2 player
L Benkenstein
Weak Negative Correlation
0.35
1 player
L Benkenstein
2 player
CW Allison
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.56
1 player
L Benkenstein
2 player
S Harmer
Negative Correlation
-0.5
1 player
L Benkenstein
2 player
J Cox
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
L Benkenstein
2 player
M Pepper
No Correlation
0
1 player
L Benkenstein
2 player
P Walter
No Correlation
0
1 player
L Benkenstein
2 player
A Beard
No Correlation
-0.78
1 player
L Benkenstein
2 player
B Allison
Negative Correlation
-0.5
1 player
L Benkenstein
2 player
A Rossington
Negative Correlation
-0.08
1 player
L Benkenstein
2 player
M Critchley
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
L Benkenstein
2 player
D Elgar
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
L Benkenstein
2 player
L Benkenstein
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

No data found

Pick CW Allison and J Cox together
Negative Correlation

Pick B Allison and L Benkenstein together
Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 M Critchley

AR
Similar Perfomance
J Cox 0.2
P Walter 0.11
S Harmer 0.08
A Beard 0.07
Opposite Perfomance
CW Allison -0.33
B Allison -0.33
M Pepper -0.19
D Elgar -0.14
L Benkenstein -0.08

2 P Walter

AR
Similar Perfomance
A Rossington 0.3
J Cox 0.2
M Critchley 0.11
Opposite Perfomance
B Allison -0.4
CW Allison -0.33
D Elgar -0.33
S Harmer -0.23
A Beard -0.08
M Pepper -0.04

3 M Pepper

WK
Similar Perfomance
D Elgar 0.43
B Allison 0.27
Opposite Perfomance
A Beard -0.43
CW Allison -0.33
S Harmer -0.33
M Critchley -0.19
A Rossington -0.16
P Walter -0.04

4 A Rossington

WK
Similar Perfomance
P Walter 0.3
B Allison 0.2
S Harmer 0.16
A Beard 0.08
D Elgar 0.08
Opposite Perfomance
L Benkenstein -0.5
CW Allison -0.33
M Pepper -0.16

5 S Harmer

BOW
Similar Perfomance
B Allison 0.56
A Rossington 0.16
J Cox 0.11
M Critchley 0.08
Opposite Perfomance
L Benkenstein -0.56
CW Allison -0.33
M Pepper -0.33
A Beard -0.33
D Elgar -0.27
P Walter -0.23

PerfectLineup © 2024. All Rights Reserved