MEL vs PER

This guide is super useful for identifying player combinations that are likely to score big. Use the filters to identify the best player combinations according to specific match scenarios.

Both players generally perform similarly when picked together. They either score high together or score low together. Maximise FPts by picking players that correlate positively with top players.

Both players generally perform in an opposite manner. If one player scores high, the other usually scores low. Avoid picking players that correlate negatively with top player

Show Player Combinations on the basis of:

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

H Matthews AR MEL

N Stalenberg BAT MEL

S Molineux BOW MEL

C Webb BAT MEL

S Coyte BOW MEL

N Faltum WK MEL

T Norris BOW MEL

E de Broughe AR MEL

D Dottin BAT MEL

A Capsey BAT MEL

G Wareham AR MEL

H Matthews

N Stalenberg

S Molineux

C Webb

S Coyte

N Faltum

T Norris

E de Broughe

D Dottin

A Capsey

G Wareham

1

1 player

H Matthews

2 player

H Matthews

Strong Positive Correlation

0.12

1 player

H Matthews

2 player

N Stalenberg

No Correlation

0.34

1 player

H Matthews

2 player

S Molineux

Weak Positive Correlation

0.27

1 player

H Matthews

2 player

C Webb

Weak Positive Correlation

0.48

1 player

H Matthews

2 player

S Coyte

Positive Correlation

0.08

1 player

H Matthews

2 player

N Faltum

No Correlation

-0.03

1 player

H Matthews

2 player

E de Broughe

No Correlation

-0.07

1 player

H Matthews

2 player

D Dottin

No Correlation

0

1 player

H Matthews

2 player

A Capsey

No Correlation

0.36

1 player

H Matthews

2 player

G Wareham

Weak Positive Correlation

0.12

1 player

N Stalenberg

2 player

H Matthews

No Correlation

1

1 player

N Stalenberg

2 player

N Stalenberg

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.26

1 player

N Stalenberg

2 player

S Molineux

Weak Negative Correlation

0.4

1 player

N Stalenberg

2 player

C Webb

Positive Correlation

0.45

1 player

N Stalenberg

2 player

S Coyte

Positive Correlation

0.32

1 player

N Stalenberg

2 player

N Faltum

Weak Positive Correlation

0.29

1 player

N Stalenberg

2 player

E de Broughe

Weak Positive Correlation

0.68

1 player

N Stalenberg

2 player

D Dottin

Positive Correlation

-0.2

1 player

N Stalenberg

2 player

A Capsey

No Correlation

-0.2

1 player

N Stalenberg

2 player

G Wareham

No Correlation

0.34

1 player

S Molineux

2 player

H Matthews

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.26

1 player

S Molineux

2 player

N Stalenberg

Weak Negative Correlation

1

1 player

S Molineux

2 player

S Molineux

Strong Positive Correlation

0.31

1 player

S Molineux

2 player

C Webb

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.22

1 player

S Molineux

2 player

S Coyte

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.1

1 player

S Molineux

2 player

N Faltum

No Correlation

-0.25

1 player

S Molineux

2 player

E de Broughe

Weak Negative Correlation

0

1 player

S Molineux

2 player

D Dottin

No Correlation

0.22

1 player

S Molineux

2 player

A Capsey

Weak Positive Correlation

0.45

1 player

S Molineux

2 player

G Wareham

Positive Correlation

0.27

1 player

C Webb

2 player

H Matthews

Weak Positive Correlation

0.4

1 player

C Webb

2 player

N Stalenberg

Positive Correlation

0.31

1 player

C Webb

2 player

S Molineux

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

C Webb

2 player

C Webb

Strong Positive Correlation

0.27

1 player

C Webb

2 player

S Coyte

Weak Positive Correlation

0.23

1 player

C Webb

2 player

N Faltum

Weak Positive Correlation

0.25

1 player

C Webb

2 player

E de Broughe

Weak Positive Correlation

0.3

1 player

C Webb

2 player

D Dottin

Weak Positive Correlation

0.6

1 player

C Webb

2 player

A Capsey

Positive Correlation

0.14

1 player

C Webb

2 player

G Wareham

No Correlation

0.48

1 player

S Coyte

2 player

H Matthews

Positive Correlation

0.45

1 player

S Coyte

2 player

N Stalenberg

Positive Correlation

-0.22

1 player

S Coyte

2 player

S Molineux

Weak Negative Correlation

0.27

1 player

S Coyte

2 player

C Webb

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

S Coyte

2 player

S Coyte

Strong Positive Correlation

0.4

1 player

S Coyte

2 player

N Faltum

Positive Correlation

0.32

1 player

S Coyte

2 player

E de Broughe

Weak Positive Correlation

0.54

1 player

S Coyte

2 player

D Dottin

Positive Correlation

-0.11

1 player

S Coyte

2 player

A Capsey

No Correlation

0.16

1 player

S Coyte

2 player

G Wareham

No Correlation

0.08

1 player

N Faltum

2 player

H Matthews

No Correlation

0.32

1 player

N Faltum

2 player

N Stalenberg

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.1

1 player

N Faltum

2 player

S Molineux

No Correlation

0.23

1 player

N Faltum

2 player

C Webb

Weak Positive Correlation

0.4

1 player

N Faltum

2 player

S Coyte

Positive Correlation

1

1 player

N Faltum

2 player

N Faltum

Strong Positive Correlation

0.19

1 player

N Faltum

2 player

E de Broughe

No Correlation

0.52

1 player

N Faltum

2 player

D Dottin

Positive Correlation

0.02

1 player

N Faltum

2 player

A Capsey

No Correlation

0.08

1 player

N Faltum

2 player

G Wareham

No Correlation

-0.03

1 player

E de Broughe

2 player

H Matthews

No Correlation

0.29

1 player

E de Broughe

2 player

N Stalenberg

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.25

1 player

E de Broughe

2 player

S Molineux

Weak Negative Correlation

0.25

1 player

E de Broughe

2 player

C Webb

Weak Positive Correlation

0.32

1 player

E de Broughe

2 player

S Coyte

Weak Positive Correlation

0.19

1 player

E de Broughe

2 player

N Faltum

No Correlation

1

1 player

E de Broughe

2 player

E de Broughe

Strong Positive Correlation

0.35

1 player

E de Broughe

2 player

D Dottin

Weak Positive Correlation

0.18

1 player

E de Broughe

2 player

A Capsey

No Correlation

0.09

1 player

E de Broughe

2 player

G Wareham

No Correlation

-0.07

1 player

D Dottin

2 player

H Matthews

No Correlation

0.68

1 player

D Dottin

2 player

N Stalenberg

Positive Correlation

0

1 player

D Dottin

2 player

S Molineux

No Correlation

0.3

1 player

D Dottin

2 player

C Webb

Weak Positive Correlation

0.54

1 player

D Dottin

2 player

S Coyte

Positive Correlation

0.52

1 player

D Dottin

2 player

N Faltum

Positive Correlation

0.35

1 player

D Dottin

2 player

E de Broughe

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

D Dottin

2 player

D Dottin

Strong Positive Correlation

0.18

1 player

D Dottin

2 player

A Capsey

No Correlation

0.18

1 player

D Dottin

2 player

G Wareham

No Correlation

0

1 player

A Capsey

2 player

H Matthews

No Correlation

-0.2

1 player

A Capsey

2 player

N Stalenberg

No Correlation

0.22

1 player

A Capsey

2 player

S Molineux

Weak Positive Correlation

0.6

1 player

A Capsey

2 player

C Webb

Positive Correlation

-0.11

1 player

A Capsey

2 player

S Coyte

No Correlation

0.02

1 player

A Capsey

2 player

N Faltum

No Correlation

0.18

1 player

A Capsey

2 player

E de Broughe

No Correlation

0.18

1 player

A Capsey

2 player

D Dottin

No Correlation

1

1 player

A Capsey

2 player

A Capsey

Strong Positive Correlation

0.42

1 player

A Capsey

2 player

G Wareham

Positive Correlation

0.36

1 player

G Wareham

2 player

H Matthews

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.2

1 player

G Wareham

2 player

N Stalenberg

No Correlation

0.45

1 player

G Wareham

2 player

S Molineux

Positive Correlation

0.14

1 player

G Wareham

2 player

C Webb

No Correlation

0.16

1 player

G Wareham

2 player

S Coyte

No Correlation

0.08

1 player

G Wareham

2 player

N Faltum

No Correlation

0.09

1 player

G Wareham

2 player

E de Broughe

No Correlation

0.18

1 player

G Wareham

2 player

D Dottin

No Correlation

0.42

1 player

G Wareham

2 player

A Capsey

Positive Correlation

1

1 player

G Wareham

2 player

G Wareham

Strong Positive Correlation

Strong Positive Correlation

No Correlation

Strong Negative Correlation

Pick **N Stalenberg** and **T Norris** together

Strong Positive Correlation

Pick **N Stalenberg** and **D Dottin** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **C Webb** and **A Capsey** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **S Coyte** and **T Norris** together

Strong Positive Correlation

Don’t Pick **S Molineux** and **T Norris** together

Strong Negative Correlation

Don’t Pick **T Norris** and **G Wareham** together

Negative Correlation

Similar Perfomance

S Coyte 0.48

G Wareham 0.36

S Molineux 0.34

C Webb 0.27

N Stalenberg 0.12

N Faltum 0.08

Opposite Perfomance

D Dottin -0.07

E de Broughe -0.03

Similar Perfomance

D Dottin 0.54

H Matthews 0.48

N Stalenberg 0.45

N Faltum 0.4

E de Broughe 0.32

C Webb 0.27

G Wareham 0.16

Opposite Perfomance

S Molineux -0.22

A Capsey -0.11

Similar Perfomance

S Molineux 0.45

A Capsey 0.42

H Matthews 0.36

D Dottin 0.18

S Coyte 0.16

C Webb 0.14

E de Broughe 0.09

N Faltum 0.08

Opposite Perfomance

N Stalenberg -0.2

Similar Perfomance

A Capsey 0.6

N Stalenberg 0.4

S Molineux 0.31

D Dottin 0.3

H Matthews 0.27

S Coyte 0.27

E de Broughe 0.25

N Faltum 0.23

G Wareham 0.14

Opposite Perfomance

Similar Perfomance

G Wareham 0.45

H Matthews 0.34

C Webb 0.31

A Capsey 0.22

Opposite Perfomance

N Stalenberg -0.26

E de Broughe -0.25

S Coyte -0.22

N Faltum -0.1

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

A Jones WK PER

E Hoskin BOW PER

C Ainsworth BOW PER

C Piparo BAT PER

M Hinkley BAT PER

A King BOW PER

D Hemalatha BAT PER

L Mills BOW PER

A Edgar AR PER

S Devine AR PER

B Mooney WK PER

A Jones

E Hoskin

C Ainsworth

C Piparo

M Hinkley

A King

D Hemalatha

L Mills

A Edgar

S Devine

B Mooney

1

1 player

A Jones

2 player

A Jones

Strong Positive Correlation

0.55

1 player

A Jones

2 player

E Hoskin

Positive Correlation

0.12

1 player

A Jones

2 player

C Ainsworth

No Correlation

0.29

1 player

A Jones

2 player

C Piparo

Weak Positive Correlation

0.35

1 player

A Jones

2 player

M Hinkley

Weak Positive Correlation

0.14

1 player

A Jones

2 player

A King

No Correlation

0.39

1 player

A Jones

2 player

L Mills

Weak Positive Correlation

0.39

1 player

A Jones

2 player

A Edgar

Weak Positive Correlation

0.11

1 player

A Jones

2 player

B Mooney

No Correlation

0.55

1 player

E Hoskin

2 player

A Jones

Positive Correlation

1

1 player

E Hoskin

2 player

E Hoskin

Strong Positive Correlation

0.35

1 player

E Hoskin

2 player

C Ainsworth

Weak Positive Correlation

0.35

1 player

E Hoskin

2 player

C Piparo

Weak Positive Correlation

0.35

1 player

E Hoskin

2 player

M Hinkley

Weak Positive Correlation

0.35

1 player

E Hoskin

2 player

A King

Weak Positive Correlation

0.85

1 player

E Hoskin

2 player

L Mills

Strong Positive Correlation

0.3

1 player

E Hoskin

2 player

A Edgar

Weak Positive Correlation

0.7

1 player

E Hoskin

2 player

B Mooney

Positive Correlation

0.12

1 player

C Ainsworth

2 player

A Jones

No Correlation

0.35

1 player

C Ainsworth

2 player

E Hoskin

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

C Ainsworth

2 player

C Ainsworth

Strong Positive Correlation

0.44

1 player

C Ainsworth

2 player

C Piparo

Positive Correlation

-0.1

1 player

C Ainsworth

2 player

M Hinkley

No Correlation

0.32

1 player

C Ainsworth

2 player

A King

Weak Positive Correlation

0.27

1 player

C Ainsworth

2 player

L Mills

Weak Positive Correlation

0.4

1 player

C Ainsworth

2 player

A Edgar

Positive Correlation

0.43

1 player

C Ainsworth

2 player

B Mooney

Positive Correlation

0.29

1 player

C Piparo

2 player

A Jones

Weak Positive Correlation

0.35

1 player

C Piparo

2 player

E Hoskin

Weak Positive Correlation

0.44

1 player

C Piparo

2 player

C Ainsworth

Positive Correlation

1

1 player

C Piparo

2 player

C Piparo

Strong Positive Correlation

0.34

1 player

C Piparo

2 player

M Hinkley

Weak Positive Correlation

0.14

1 player

C Piparo

2 player

A King

No Correlation

0.35

1 player

C Piparo

2 player

L Mills

Weak Positive Correlation

0.41

1 player

C Piparo

2 player

A Edgar

Positive Correlation

0.14

1 player

C Piparo

2 player

B Mooney

No Correlation

0.35

1 player

M Hinkley

2 player

A Jones

Weak Positive Correlation

0.35

1 player

M Hinkley

2 player

E Hoskin

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.1

1 player

M Hinkley

2 player

C Ainsworth

No Correlation

0.34

1 player

M Hinkley

2 player

C Piparo

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

M Hinkley

2 player

M Hinkley

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.08

1 player

M Hinkley

2 player

A King

No Correlation

0.54

1 player

M Hinkley

2 player

L Mills

Positive Correlation

0

1 player

M Hinkley

2 player

A Edgar

No Correlation

-0.18

1 player

M Hinkley

2 player

B Mooney

No Correlation

0.14

1 player

A King

2 player

A Jones

No Correlation

0.35

1 player

A King

2 player

E Hoskin

Weak Positive Correlation

0.32

1 player

A King

2 player

C Ainsworth

Weak Positive Correlation

0.14

1 player

A King

2 player

C Piparo

No Correlation

-0.08

1 player

A King

2 player

M Hinkley

No Correlation

1

1 player

A King

2 player

A King

Strong Positive Correlation

0.04

1 player

A King

2 player

L Mills

No Correlation

0.27

1 player

A King

2 player

A Edgar

Weak Positive Correlation

0.15

1 player

A King

2 player

B Mooney

No Correlation

0.39

1 player

L Mills

2 player

A Jones

Weak Positive Correlation

0.85

1 player

L Mills

2 player

E Hoskin

Strong Positive Correlation

0.27

1 player

L Mills

2 player

C Ainsworth

Weak Positive Correlation

0.35

1 player

L Mills

2 player

C Piparo

Weak Positive Correlation

0.54

1 player

L Mills

2 player

M Hinkley

Positive Correlation

0.04

1 player

L Mills

2 player

A King

No Correlation

1

1 player

L Mills

2 player

L Mills

Strong Positive Correlation

0.14

1 player

L Mills

2 player

A Edgar

No Correlation

0.07

1 player

L Mills

2 player

B Mooney

No Correlation

0.39

1 player

A Edgar

2 player

A Jones

Weak Positive Correlation

0.3

1 player

A Edgar

2 player

E Hoskin

Weak Positive Correlation

0.4

1 player

A Edgar

2 player

C Ainsworth

Positive Correlation

0.41

1 player

A Edgar

2 player

C Piparo

Positive Correlation

0

1 player

A Edgar

2 player

M Hinkley

No Correlation

0.27

1 player

A Edgar

2 player

A King

Weak Positive Correlation

0.14

1 player

A Edgar

2 player

L Mills

No Correlation

1

1 player

A Edgar

2 player

A Edgar

Strong Positive Correlation

0.38

1 player

A Edgar

2 player

B Mooney

Weak Positive Correlation

0.11

1 player

B Mooney

2 player

A Jones

No Correlation

0.7

1 player

B Mooney

2 player

E Hoskin

Positive Correlation

0.43

1 player

B Mooney

2 player

C Ainsworth

Positive Correlation

0.14

1 player

B Mooney

2 player

C Piparo

No Correlation

-0.18

1 player

B Mooney

2 player

M Hinkley

No Correlation

0.15

1 player

B Mooney

2 player

A King

No Correlation

0.07

1 player

B Mooney

2 player

L Mills

No Correlation

0.38

1 player

B Mooney

2 player

A Edgar

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

B Mooney

2 player

B Mooney

Strong Positive Correlation

Strong Positive Correlation

No Correlation

Strong Negative Correlation

Pick **A Jones** and **D Hemalatha** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **E Hoskin** and **L Mills** together

Strong Positive Correlation

Pick **E Hoskin** and **S Devine** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **E Hoskin** and **B Mooney** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **C Piparo** and **D Hemalatha** together

Strong Positive Correlation

Pick **D Hemalatha** and **A Edgar** together

Positive Correlation

Similar Perfomance

E Hoskin 0.7

C Ainsworth 0.43

A Edgar 0.38

A King 0.15

C Piparo 0.14

A Jones 0.11

L Mills 0.07

Opposite Perfomance

M Hinkley -0.18

Similar Perfomance

E Hoskin 0.35

C Ainsworth 0.32

A Edgar 0.27

B Mooney 0.15

A Jones 0.14

C Piparo 0.14

L Mills 0.04

Opposite Perfomance

M Hinkley -0.08

Similar Perfomance

C Piparo 0.41

C Ainsworth 0.4

A Jones 0.39

B Mooney 0.38

E Hoskin 0.3

A King 0.27

L Mills 0.14

Similar Perfomance

E Hoskin 0.85

M Hinkley 0.54

A Jones 0.39

C Piparo 0.35

C Ainsworth 0.27

A Edgar 0.14

B Mooney 0.07

A King 0.04

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

H Matthews AR MEL

N Stalenberg BAT MEL

S Molineux BOW MEL

C Webb BAT MEL

S Coyte BOW MEL

N Faltum WK MEL

T Norris BOW MEL

E de Broughe AR MEL

D Dottin BAT MEL

A Capsey BAT MEL

G Wareham AR MEL

H Matthews

N Stalenberg

S Molineux

C Webb

S Coyte

N Faltum

T Norris

E de Broughe

D Dottin

A Capsey

G Wareham

1

1 player

H Matthews

2 player

H Matthews

Strong Positive Correlation

0

1 player

H Matthews

2 player

N Stalenberg

No Correlation

0.11

1 player

H Matthews

2 player

S Molineux

No Correlation

0.17

1 player

H Matthews

2 player

C Webb

No Correlation

0.57

1 player

H Matthews

2 player

S Coyte

Positive Correlation

-0.14

1 player

H Matthews

2 player

N Faltum

No Correlation

-0.4

1 player

H Matthews

2 player

E de Broughe

Weak Negative Correlation

0.35

1 player

H Matthews

2 player

D Dottin

Weak Positive Correlation

0

1 player

H Matthews

2 player

A Capsey

No Correlation

0.41

1 player

H Matthews

2 player

G Wareham

Positive Correlation

0

1 player

N Stalenberg

2 player

H Matthews

No Correlation

1

1 player

N Stalenberg

2 player

N Stalenberg

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.42

1 player

N Stalenberg

2 player

S Molineux

Negative Correlation

-0.09

1 player

N Stalenberg

2 player

C Webb

No Correlation

0.6

1 player

N Stalenberg

2 player

S Coyte

Positive Correlation

0.25

1 player

N Stalenberg

2 player

N Faltum

Weak Positive Correlation

0.4

1 player

N Stalenberg

2 player

E de Broughe

Positive Correlation

0.7

1 player

N Stalenberg

2 player

D Dottin

Positive Correlation

-0.7

1 player

N Stalenberg

2 player

A Capsey

Negative Correlation

-0.67

1 player

N Stalenberg

2 player

G Wareham

Negative Correlation

0.11

1 player

S Molineux

2 player

H Matthews

No Correlation

-0.42

1 player

S Molineux

2 player

N Stalenberg

Negative Correlation

1

1 player

S Molineux

2 player

S Molineux

Strong Positive Correlation

0.2

1 player

S Molineux

2 player

C Webb

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.5

1 player

S Molineux

2 player

S Coyte

Negative Correlation

-0.42

1 player

S Molineux

2 player

N Faltum

Negative Correlation

-0.7

1 player

S Molineux

2 player

E de Broughe

Negative Correlation

-0.42

1 player

S Molineux

2 player

D Dottin

Negative Correlation

0.14

1 player

S Molineux

2 player

A Capsey

No Correlation

0.7

1 player

S Molineux

2 player

G Wareham

Positive Correlation

0.17

1 player

C Webb

2 player

H Matthews

No Correlation

-0.09

1 player

C Webb

2 player

N Stalenberg

No Correlation

0.2

1 player

C Webb

2 player

S Molineux

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

C Webb

2 player

C Webb

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.08

1 player

C Webb

2 player

S Coyte

No Correlation

-0.2

1 player

C Webb

2 player

N Faltum

No Correlation

0.33

1 player

C Webb

2 player

E de Broughe

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.14

1 player

C Webb

2 player

D Dottin

No Correlation

0.43

1 player

C Webb

2 player

A Capsey

Positive Correlation

-0.29

1 player

C Webb

2 player

G Wareham

Weak Negative Correlation

0.57

1 player

S Coyte

2 player

H Matthews

Positive Correlation

0.6

1 player

S Coyte

2 player

N Stalenberg

Positive Correlation

-0.5

1 player

S Coyte

2 player

S Molineux

Negative Correlation

-0.08

1 player

S Coyte

2 player

C Webb

No Correlation

1

1 player

S Coyte

2 player

S Coyte

Strong Positive Correlation

0.11

1 player

S Coyte

2 player

N Faltum

No Correlation

0.08

1 player

S Coyte

2 player

E de Broughe

No Correlation

0.7

1 player

S Coyte

2 player

D Dottin

Positive Correlation

-0.33

1 player

S Coyte

2 player

A Capsey

Weak Negative Correlation

0.38

1 player

S Coyte

2 player

G Wareham

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.14

1 player

N Faltum

2 player

H Matthews

No Correlation

0.25

1 player

N Faltum

2 player

N Stalenberg

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.42

1 player

N Faltum

2 player

S Molineux

Negative Correlation

-0.2

1 player

N Faltum

2 player

C Webb

No Correlation

0.11

1 player

N Faltum

2 player

S Coyte

No Correlation

1

1 player

N Faltum

2 player

N Faltum

Strong Positive Correlation

0.11

1 player

N Faltum

2 player

E de Broughe

No Correlation

0.35

1 player

N Faltum

2 player

D Dottin

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.67

1 player

N Faltum

2 player

A Capsey

Negative Correlation

-0.42

1 player

N Faltum

2 player

G Wareham

Negative Correlation

-0.4

1 player

E de Broughe

2 player

H Matthews

Weak Negative Correlation

0.4

1 player

E de Broughe

2 player

N Stalenberg

Positive Correlation

-0.7

1 player

E de Broughe

2 player

S Molineux

Negative Correlation

0.33

1 player

E de Broughe

2 player

C Webb

Weak Positive Correlation

0.08

1 player

E de Broughe

2 player

S Coyte

No Correlation

0.11

1 player

E de Broughe

2 player

N Faltum

No Correlation

1

1 player

E de Broughe

2 player

E de Broughe

Strong Positive Correlation

0.35

1 player

E de Broughe

2 player

D Dottin

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.33

1 player

E de Broughe

2 player

A Capsey

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.64

1 player

E de Broughe

2 player

G Wareham

Negative Correlation

0.35

1 player

D Dottin

2 player

H Matthews

Weak Positive Correlation

0.7

1 player

D Dottin

2 player

N Stalenberg

Positive Correlation

-0.42

1 player

D Dottin

2 player

S Molineux

Negative Correlation

-0.14

1 player

D Dottin

2 player

C Webb

No Correlation

0.7

1 player

D Dottin

2 player

S Coyte

Positive Correlation

0.35

1 player

D Dottin

2 player

N Faltum

Weak Positive Correlation

0.35

1 player

D Dottin

2 player

E de Broughe

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

D Dottin

2 player

D Dottin

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.7

1 player

D Dottin

2 player

A Capsey

Negative Correlation

-0.35

1 player

D Dottin

2 player

G Wareham

Weak Negative Correlation

0

1 player

A Capsey

2 player

H Matthews

No Correlation

-0.7

1 player

A Capsey

2 player

N Stalenberg

Negative Correlation

0.14

1 player

A Capsey

2 player

S Molineux

No Correlation

0.43

1 player

A Capsey

2 player

C Webb

Positive Correlation

-0.33

1 player

A Capsey

2 player

S Coyte

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.67

1 player

A Capsey

2 player

N Faltum

Negative Correlation

-0.33

1 player

A Capsey

2 player

E de Broughe

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.7

1 player

A Capsey

2 player

D Dottin

Negative Correlation

1

1 player

A Capsey

2 player

A Capsey

Strong Positive Correlation

0.33

1 player

A Capsey

2 player

G Wareham

Weak Positive Correlation

0.41

1 player

G Wareham

2 player

H Matthews

Positive Correlation

-0.67

1 player

G Wareham

2 player

N Stalenberg

Negative Correlation

0.7

1 player

G Wareham

2 player

S Molineux

Positive Correlation

-0.29

1 player

G Wareham

2 player

C Webb

Weak Negative Correlation

0.38

1 player

G Wareham

2 player

S Coyte

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.42

1 player

G Wareham

2 player

N Faltum

Negative Correlation

-0.64

1 player

G Wareham

2 player

E de Broughe

Negative Correlation

-0.35

1 player

G Wareham

2 player

D Dottin

Weak Negative Correlation

0.33

1 player

G Wareham

2 player

A Capsey

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

G Wareham

2 player

G Wareham

Strong Positive Correlation

Strong Positive Correlation

No Correlation

Strong Negative Correlation

Pick **N Stalenberg** and **S Coyte** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **S Molineux** and **G Wareham** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **S Coyte** and **D Dottin** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **N Faltum** and **T Norris** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **T Norris** and **E de Broughe** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **T Norris** and **D Dottin** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **N Stalenberg** and **A Capsey** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **N Stalenberg** and **G Wareham** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **S Molineux** and **E de Broughe** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **N Faltum** and **A Capsey** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **T Norris** and **A Capsey** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **E de Broughe** and **G Wareham** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **D Dottin** and **A Capsey** together

Negative Correlation

Similar Perfomance

S Coyte 0.57

G Wareham 0.41

D Dottin 0.35

C Webb 0.17

S Molineux 0.11

Opposite Perfomance

E de Broughe -0.4

N Faltum -0.14

Similar Perfomance

S Molineux 0.7

H Matthews 0.41

S Coyte 0.38

A Capsey 0.33

Opposite Perfomance

N Stalenberg -0.67

E de Broughe -0.64

N Faltum -0.42

D Dottin -0.35

C Webb -0.29

Similar Perfomance

A Capsey 0.43

E de Broughe 0.33

S Molineux 0.2

H Matthews 0.17

Opposite Perfomance

G Wareham -0.29

N Faltum -0.2

D Dottin -0.14

N Stalenberg -0.09

S Coyte -0.08

Similar Perfomance

D Dottin 0.7

N Stalenberg 0.6

H Matthews 0.57

G Wareham 0.38

N Faltum 0.11

E de Broughe 0.08

Opposite Perfomance

S Molineux -0.5

A Capsey -0.33

C Webb -0.08

Similar Perfomance

G Wareham 0.7

C Webb 0.2

A Capsey 0.14

H Matthews 0.11

Opposite Perfomance

E de Broughe -0.7

S Coyte -0.5

N Stalenberg -0.42

N Faltum -0.42

D Dottin -0.42

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

A Jones WK PER

E Hoskin BOW PER

C Ainsworth BOW PER

C Piparo BAT PER

M Hinkley BAT PER

A King BOW PER

D Hemalatha BAT PER

L Mills BOW PER

A Edgar AR PER

S Devine AR PER

B Mooney WK PER

A Jones

E Hoskin

C Ainsworth

C Piparo

M Hinkley

A King

D Hemalatha

L Mills

A Edgar

S Devine

B Mooney

1

1 player

A Jones

2 player

A Jones

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.7

1 player

A Jones

2 player

E Hoskin

Negative Correlation

-0.23

1 player

A Jones

2 player

C Ainsworth

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.27

1 player

A Jones

2 player

C Piparo

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.35

1 player

A Jones

2 player

M Hinkley

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.33

1 player

A Jones

2 player

A King

Weak Negative Correlation

0.09

1 player

A Jones

2 player

L Mills

No Correlation

0.07

1 player

A Jones

2 player

A Edgar

No Correlation

-0.07

1 player

A Jones

2 player

B Mooney

No Correlation

-0.7

1 player

E Hoskin

2 player

A Jones

Negative Correlation

1

1 player

E Hoskin

2 player

E Hoskin

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.7

1 player

E Hoskin

2 player

C Ainsworth

Negative Correlation

0

1 player

E Hoskin

2 player

C Piparo

No Correlation

0.7

1 player

E Hoskin

2 player

M Hinkley

Positive Correlation

0

1 player

E Hoskin

2 player

A King

No Correlation

0

1 player

E Hoskin

2 player

L Mills

No Correlation

0

1 player

E Hoskin

2 player

A Edgar

No Correlation

0

1 player

E Hoskin

2 player

B Mooney

No Correlation

-0.23

1 player

C Ainsworth

2 player

A Jones

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.7

1 player

C Ainsworth

2 player

E Hoskin

Negative Correlation

1

1 player

C Ainsworth

2 player

C Ainsworth

Strong Positive Correlation

0.45

1 player

C Ainsworth

2 player

C Piparo

Positive Correlation

-0.7

1 player

C Ainsworth

2 player

M Hinkley

Negative Correlation

-0.07

1 player

C Ainsworth

2 player

A King

No Correlation

-0.09

1 player

C Ainsworth

2 player

L Mills

No Correlation

0.47

1 player

C Ainsworth

2 player

A Edgar

Positive Correlation

0.33

1 player

C Ainsworth

2 player

B Mooney

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.27

1 player

C Piparo

2 player

A Jones

Weak Negative Correlation

0

1 player

C Piparo

2 player

E Hoskin

No Correlation

0.45

1 player

C Piparo

2 player

C Ainsworth

Positive Correlation

1

1 player

C Piparo

2 player

C Piparo

Strong Positive Correlation

0.14

1 player

C Piparo

2 player

M Hinkley

No Correlation

-0.27

1 player

C Piparo

2 player

A King

Weak Negative Correlation

0.27

1 player

C Piparo

2 player

L Mills

Weak Positive Correlation

0.09

1 player

C Piparo

2 player

A Edgar

No Correlation

0.27

1 player

C Piparo

2 player

B Mooney

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.35

1 player

M Hinkley

2 player

A Jones

Weak Negative Correlation

0.7

1 player

M Hinkley

2 player

E Hoskin

Positive Correlation

-0.7

1 player

M Hinkley

2 player

C Ainsworth

Negative Correlation

0.14

1 player

M Hinkley

2 player

C Piparo

No Correlation

1

1 player

M Hinkley

2 player

M Hinkley

Strong Positive Correlation

0

1 player

M Hinkley

2 player

A King

No Correlation

0.14

1 player

M Hinkley

2 player

L Mills

No Correlation

-0.35

1 player

M Hinkley

2 player

A Edgar

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.35

1 player

M Hinkley

2 player

B Mooney

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.33

1 player

A King

2 player

A Jones

Weak Negative Correlation

0

1 player

A King

2 player

E Hoskin

No Correlation

-0.07

1 player

A King

2 player

C Ainsworth

No Correlation

-0.27

1 player

A King

2 player

C Piparo

Weak Negative Correlation

0

1 player

A King

2 player

M Hinkley

No Correlation

1

1 player

A King

2 player

A King

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.27

1 player

A King

2 player

L Mills

Weak Negative Correlation

0

1 player

A King

2 player

A Edgar

No Correlation

0.15

1 player

A King

2 player

B Mooney

No Correlation

0.09

1 player

L Mills

2 player

A Jones

No Correlation

0

1 player

L Mills

2 player

E Hoskin

No Correlation

-0.09

1 player

L Mills

2 player

C Ainsworth

No Correlation

0.27

1 player

L Mills

2 player

C Piparo

Weak Positive Correlation

0.14

1 player

L Mills

2 player

M Hinkley

No Correlation

-0.27

1 player

L Mills

2 player

A King

Weak Negative Correlation

1

1 player

L Mills

2 player

L Mills

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.18

1 player

L Mills

2 player

A Edgar

No Correlation

0.18

1 player

L Mills

2 player

B Mooney

No Correlation

0.07

1 player

A Edgar

2 player

A Jones

No Correlation

0

1 player

A Edgar

2 player

E Hoskin

No Correlation

0.47

1 player

A Edgar

2 player

C Ainsworth

Positive Correlation

0.09

1 player

A Edgar

2 player

C Piparo

No Correlation

-0.35

1 player

A Edgar

2 player

M Hinkley

Weak Negative Correlation

0

1 player

A Edgar

2 player

A King

No Correlation

-0.18

1 player

A Edgar

2 player

L Mills

No Correlation

1

1 player

A Edgar

2 player

A Edgar

Strong Positive Correlation

0.38

1 player

A Edgar

2 player

B Mooney

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.07

1 player

B Mooney

2 player

A Jones

No Correlation

0

1 player

B Mooney

2 player

E Hoskin

No Correlation

0.33

1 player

B Mooney

2 player

C Ainsworth

Weak Positive Correlation

0.27

1 player

B Mooney

2 player

C Piparo

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.35

1 player

B Mooney

2 player

M Hinkley

Weak Negative Correlation

0.15

1 player

B Mooney

2 player

A King

No Correlation

0.18

1 player

B Mooney

2 player

L Mills

No Correlation

0.38

1 player

B Mooney

2 player

A Edgar

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

B Mooney

2 player

B Mooney

Strong Positive Correlation

Strong Positive Correlation

No Correlation

Strong Negative Correlation

Pick **E Hoskin** and **M Hinkley** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **C Ainsworth** and **D Hemalatha** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **A Jones** and **E Hoskin** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **E Hoskin** and **C Ainsworth** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **E Hoskin** and **D Hemalatha** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **C Ainsworth** and **M Hinkley** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **M Hinkley** and **D Hemalatha** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **A King** and **D Hemalatha** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **D Hemalatha** and **L Mills** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **D Hemalatha** and **S Devine** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **D Hemalatha** and **B Mooney** together

Negative Correlation

Similar Perfomance

B Mooney 0.15

Opposite Perfomance

A Jones -0.33

C Piparo -0.27

L Mills -0.27

C Ainsworth -0.07

Similar Perfomance

C Ainsworth 0.47

B Mooney 0.38

C Piparo 0.09

A Jones 0.07

Opposite Perfomance

M Hinkley -0.35

L Mills -0.18

Similar Perfomance

A Edgar 0.38

C Ainsworth 0.33

C Piparo 0.27

L Mills 0.18

A King 0.15

Opposite Perfomance

M Hinkley -0.35

A Jones -0.07

Similar Perfomance

C Piparo 0.27

B Mooney 0.18

M Hinkley 0.14

A Jones 0.09

Opposite Perfomance

A King -0.27

A Edgar -0.18

C Ainsworth -0.09