ND vs SES

This guide is super useful for identifying player combinations that are likely to score big. Use the filters to identify the best player combinations according to specific match scenarios.

Both players generally perform similarly when picked together. They either score high together or score low together. Maximise FPts by picking players that correlate positively with top players.

Both players generally perform in an opposite manner. If one player scores high, the other usually scores low. Avoid picking players that correlate negatively with top player

Show Player Combinations on the basis of:

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

E Marlow BAT ND

L Winfield-Hill WK ND

G Hall BOW ND

E Burns AR ND

B Heath WK ND

K Levick BOW ND

H Armitage AR ND

S Kalis BAT ND

L Dobson BAT ND

R Slater BOW ND

K Fraser AR ND

E Marlow

L Winfield-Hill

G Hall

E Burns

B Heath

K Levick

H Armitage

S Kalis

L Dobson

R Slater

K Fraser

1

1 player

E Marlow

2 player

E Marlow

Strong Positive Correlation

0.31

1 player

E Marlow

2 player

L Winfield-Hill

Weak Positive Correlation

0.26

1 player

E Marlow

2 player

G Hall

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.13

1 player

E Marlow

2 player

E Burns

No Correlation

0.46

1 player

E Marlow

2 player

B Heath

Positive Correlation

-0.11

1 player

E Marlow

2 player

K Levick

No Correlation

0.04

1 player

E Marlow

2 player

H Armitage

No Correlation

0.28

1 player

E Marlow

2 player

S Kalis

Weak Positive Correlation

0.38

1 player

E Marlow

2 player

L Dobson

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.05

1 player

E Marlow

2 player

R Slater

No Correlation

0.32

1 player

E Marlow

2 player

K Fraser

Weak Positive Correlation

0.31

1 player

L Winfield-Hill

2 player

E Marlow

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

L Winfield-Hill

2 player

L Winfield-Hill

Strong Positive Correlation

0.18

1 player

L Winfield-Hill

2 player

G Hall

No Correlation

-0.01

1 player

L Winfield-Hill

2 player

E Burns

No Correlation

0.26

1 player

L Winfield-Hill

2 player

B Heath

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.08

1 player

L Winfield-Hill

2 player

K Levick

No Correlation

0.33

1 player

L Winfield-Hill

2 player

H Armitage

Weak Positive Correlation

0.08

1 player

L Winfield-Hill

2 player

S Kalis

No Correlation

0.3

1 player

L Winfield-Hill

2 player

L Dobson

Weak Positive Correlation

0.06

1 player

L Winfield-Hill

2 player

R Slater

No Correlation

0.16

1 player

L Winfield-Hill

2 player

K Fraser

No Correlation

0.26

1 player

G Hall

2 player

E Marlow

Weak Positive Correlation

0.18

1 player

G Hall

2 player

L Winfield-Hill

No Correlation

1

1 player

G Hall

2 player

G Hall

Strong Positive Correlation

0.3

1 player

G Hall

2 player

E Burns

Weak Positive Correlation

0.23

1 player

G Hall

2 player

B Heath

Weak Positive Correlation

0.42

1 player

G Hall

2 player

K Levick

Positive Correlation

0.27

1 player

G Hall

2 player

H Armitage

Weak Positive Correlation

0.22

1 player

G Hall

2 player

S Kalis

Weak Positive Correlation

0.07

1 player

G Hall

2 player

L Dobson

No Correlation

0.36

1 player

G Hall

2 player

R Slater

Weak Positive Correlation

0

1 player

G Hall

2 player

K Fraser

No Correlation

-0.13

1 player

E Burns

2 player

E Marlow

No Correlation

-0.01

1 player

E Burns

2 player

L Winfield-Hill

No Correlation

0.3

1 player

E Burns

2 player

G Hall

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

E Burns

2 player

E Burns

Strong Positive Correlation

0.15

1 player

E Burns

2 player

B Heath

No Correlation

0.25

1 player

E Burns

2 player

K Levick

Weak Positive Correlation

0.01

1 player

E Burns

2 player

H Armitage

No Correlation

0.12

1 player

E Burns

2 player

S Kalis

No Correlation

-0.09

1 player

E Burns

2 player

L Dobson

No Correlation

0.09

1 player

E Burns

2 player

R Slater

No Correlation

0.32

1 player

E Burns

2 player

K Fraser

Weak Positive Correlation

0.46

1 player

B Heath

2 player

E Marlow

Positive Correlation

0.26

1 player

B Heath

2 player

L Winfield-Hill

Weak Positive Correlation

0.23

1 player

B Heath

2 player

G Hall

Weak Positive Correlation

0.15

1 player

B Heath

2 player

E Burns

No Correlation

1

1 player

B Heath

2 player

B Heath

Strong Positive Correlation

0.28

1 player

B Heath

2 player

K Levick

Weak Positive Correlation

0.14

1 player

B Heath

2 player

H Armitage

No Correlation

0.33

1 player

B Heath

2 player

S Kalis

Weak Positive Correlation

0.25

1 player

B Heath

2 player

L Dobson

Weak Positive Correlation

0.23

1 player

B Heath

2 player

R Slater

Weak Positive Correlation

0.21

1 player

B Heath

2 player

K Fraser

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.11

1 player

K Levick

2 player

E Marlow

No Correlation

-0.08

1 player

K Levick

2 player

L Winfield-Hill

No Correlation

0.42

1 player

K Levick

2 player

G Hall

Positive Correlation

0.25

1 player

K Levick

2 player

E Burns

Weak Positive Correlation

0.28

1 player

K Levick

2 player

B Heath

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

K Levick

2 player

K Levick

Strong Positive Correlation

0.1

1 player

K Levick

2 player

H Armitage

No Correlation

0.24

1 player

K Levick

2 player

S Kalis

Weak Positive Correlation

0.12

1 player

K Levick

2 player

L Dobson

No Correlation

0.28

1 player

K Levick

2 player

R Slater

Weak Positive Correlation

0.19

1 player

K Levick

2 player

K Fraser

No Correlation

0.04

1 player

H Armitage

2 player

E Marlow

No Correlation

0.33

1 player

H Armitage

2 player

L Winfield-Hill

Weak Positive Correlation

0.27

1 player

H Armitage

2 player

G Hall

Weak Positive Correlation

0.01

1 player

H Armitage

2 player

E Burns

No Correlation

0.14

1 player

H Armitage

2 player

B Heath

No Correlation

0.1

1 player

H Armitage

2 player

K Levick

No Correlation

1

1 player

H Armitage

2 player

H Armitage

Strong Positive Correlation

0.06

1 player

H Armitage

2 player

S Kalis

No Correlation

0.14

1 player

H Armitage

2 player

L Dobson

No Correlation

0.35

1 player

H Armitage

2 player

R Slater

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.04

1 player

H Armitage

2 player

K Fraser

No Correlation

0.28

1 player

S Kalis

2 player

E Marlow

Weak Positive Correlation

0.08

1 player

S Kalis

2 player

L Winfield-Hill

No Correlation

0.22

1 player

S Kalis

2 player

G Hall

Weak Positive Correlation

0.12

1 player

S Kalis

2 player

E Burns

No Correlation

0.33

1 player

S Kalis

2 player

B Heath

Weak Positive Correlation

0.24

1 player

S Kalis

2 player

K Levick

Weak Positive Correlation

0.06

1 player

S Kalis

2 player

H Armitage

No Correlation

1

1 player

S Kalis

2 player

S Kalis

Strong Positive Correlation

0.21

1 player

S Kalis

2 player

L Dobson

Weak Positive Correlation

0.23

1 player

S Kalis

2 player

R Slater

Weak Positive Correlation

0.38

1 player

S Kalis

2 player

K Fraser

Weak Positive Correlation

0.38

1 player

L Dobson

2 player

E Marlow

Weak Positive Correlation

0.3

1 player

L Dobson

2 player

L Winfield-Hill

Weak Positive Correlation

0.07

1 player

L Dobson

2 player

G Hall

No Correlation

-0.09

1 player

L Dobson

2 player

E Burns

No Correlation

0.25

1 player

L Dobson

2 player

B Heath

Weak Positive Correlation

0.12

1 player

L Dobson

2 player

K Levick

No Correlation

0.14

1 player

L Dobson

2 player

H Armitage

No Correlation

0.21

1 player

L Dobson

2 player

S Kalis

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

L Dobson

2 player

L Dobson

Strong Positive Correlation

0.2

1 player

L Dobson

2 player

R Slater

Weak Positive Correlation

0.26

1 player

L Dobson

2 player

K Fraser

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.05

1 player

R Slater

2 player

E Marlow

No Correlation

0.06

1 player

R Slater

2 player

L Winfield-Hill

No Correlation

0.36

1 player

R Slater

2 player

G Hall

Weak Positive Correlation

0.09

1 player

R Slater

2 player

E Burns

No Correlation

0.23

1 player

R Slater

2 player

B Heath

Weak Positive Correlation

0.28

1 player

R Slater

2 player

K Levick

Weak Positive Correlation

0.35

1 player

R Slater

2 player

H Armitage

Weak Positive Correlation

0.23

1 player

R Slater

2 player

S Kalis

Weak Positive Correlation

0.2

1 player

R Slater

2 player

L Dobson

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

R Slater

2 player

R Slater

Strong Positive Correlation

0.17

1 player

R Slater

2 player

K Fraser

No Correlation

0.32

1 player

K Fraser

2 player

E Marlow

Weak Positive Correlation

0.16

1 player

K Fraser

2 player

L Winfield-Hill

No Correlation

0

1 player

K Fraser

2 player

G Hall

No Correlation

0.32

1 player

K Fraser

2 player

E Burns

Weak Positive Correlation

0.21

1 player

K Fraser

2 player

B Heath

Weak Positive Correlation

0.19

1 player

K Fraser

2 player

K Levick

No Correlation

-0.04

1 player

K Fraser

2 player

H Armitage

No Correlation

0.38

1 player

K Fraser

2 player

S Kalis

Weak Positive Correlation

0.26

1 player

K Fraser

2 player

L Dobson

Weak Positive Correlation

0.17

1 player

K Fraser

2 player

R Slater

No Correlation

1

1 player

K Fraser

2 player

K Fraser

Strong Positive Correlation

Strong Positive Correlation

No Correlation

Strong Negative Correlation

No data found

Similar Perfomance

G Hall 0.42

B Heath 0.28

R Slater 0.28

E Burns 0.25

S Kalis 0.24

K Fraser 0.19

L Dobson 0.12

H Armitage 0.1

Opposite Perfomance

E Marlow -0.11

L Winfield-Hill -0.08

Similar Perfomance

R Slater 0.35

L Winfield-Hill 0.33

G Hall 0.27

B Heath 0.14

L Dobson 0.14

K Levick 0.1

S Kalis 0.06

E Marlow 0.04

E Burns 0.01

Opposite Perfomance

K Fraser -0.04

Similar Perfomance

E Marlow 0.46

S Kalis 0.33

K Levick 0.28

L Winfield-Hill 0.26

L Dobson 0.25

G Hall 0.23

R Slater 0.23

K Fraser 0.21

E Burns 0.15

H Armitage 0.14

Similar Perfomance

H Armitage 0.33

E Marlow 0.31

L Dobson 0.3

B Heath 0.26

G Hall 0.18

K Fraser 0.16

S Kalis 0.08

R Slater 0.06

Opposite Perfomance

K Levick -0.08

E Burns -0.01

Similar Perfomance

K Fraser 0.32

G Hall 0.3

K Levick 0.25

B Heath 0.15

S Kalis 0.12

R Slater 0.09

H Armitage 0.01

Opposite Perfomance

E Marlow -0.13

L Dobson -0.09

L Winfield-Hill -0.01

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

S Dunkley BAT SES

K Moore AR SES

TC Coleman BOW SES

T Farrant AR SES

B Smith AR SES

A Cranstone BAT SES

P Scholfield BAT SES

P Franklin AR SES

D Gregory BOW SES

C Hill WK SES

R Macdonald-Gay BOW SES

S Dunkley

K Moore

TC Coleman

T Farrant

B Smith

A Cranstone

P Scholfield

P Franklin

D Gregory

C Hill

R Macdonald-Gay

1

1 player

S Dunkley

2 player

S Dunkley

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.2

1 player

S Dunkley

2 player

K Moore

No Correlation

0.11

1 player

S Dunkley

2 player

T Farrant

No Correlation

0.43

1 player

S Dunkley

2 player

B Smith

Positive Correlation

0.31

1 player

S Dunkley

2 player

A Cranstone

Weak Positive Correlation

0.27

1 player

S Dunkley

2 player

P Scholfield

Weak Positive Correlation

0.43

1 player

S Dunkley

2 player

P Franklin

Positive Correlation

0.32

1 player

S Dunkley

2 player

D Gregory

Weak Positive Correlation

0.05

1 player

S Dunkley

2 player

C Hill

No Correlation

0.3

1 player

S Dunkley

2 player

R Macdonald-Gay

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.2

1 player

K Moore

2 player

S Dunkley

No Correlation

1

1 player

K Moore

2 player

K Moore

Strong Positive Correlation

0.28

1 player

K Moore

2 player

T Farrant

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.22

1 player

K Moore

2 player

B Smith

Weak Negative Correlation

0.47

1 player

K Moore

2 player

A Cranstone

Positive Correlation

0.19

1 player

K Moore

2 player

P Scholfield

No Correlation

-0.1

1 player

K Moore

2 player

P Franklin

No Correlation

0.11

1 player

K Moore

2 player

D Gregory

No Correlation

0.49

1 player

K Moore

2 player

C Hill

Positive Correlation

0.26

1 player

K Moore

2 player

R Macdonald-Gay

Weak Positive Correlation

0.11

1 player

T Farrant

2 player

S Dunkley

No Correlation

0.28

1 player

T Farrant

2 player

K Moore

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

T Farrant

2 player

T Farrant

Strong Positive Correlation

0.07

1 player

T Farrant

2 player

B Smith

No Correlation

0.06

1 player

T Farrant

2 player

A Cranstone

No Correlation

0.35

1 player

T Farrant

2 player

P Scholfield

Weak Positive Correlation

0

1 player

T Farrant

2 player

P Franklin

No Correlation

0.39

1 player

T Farrant

2 player

D Gregory

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.12

1 player

T Farrant

2 player

C Hill

No Correlation

0.3

1 player

T Farrant

2 player

R Macdonald-Gay

Weak Positive Correlation

0.43

1 player

B Smith

2 player

S Dunkley

Positive Correlation

-0.22

1 player

B Smith

2 player

K Moore

Weak Negative Correlation

0.07

1 player

B Smith

2 player

T Farrant

No Correlation

1

1 player

B Smith

2 player

B Smith

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.15

1 player

B Smith

2 player

A Cranstone

No Correlation

0.19

1 player

B Smith

2 player

P Scholfield

No Correlation

0.43

1 player

B Smith

2 player

P Franklin

Positive Correlation

0.16

1 player

B Smith

2 player

D Gregory

No Correlation

0.15

1 player

B Smith

2 player

C Hill

No Correlation

0

1 player

B Smith

2 player

R Macdonald-Gay

No Correlation

0.31

1 player

A Cranstone

2 player

S Dunkley

Weak Positive Correlation

0.47

1 player

A Cranstone

2 player

K Moore

Positive Correlation

0.06

1 player

A Cranstone

2 player

T Farrant

No Correlation

-0.15

1 player

A Cranstone

2 player

B Smith

No Correlation

1

1 player

A Cranstone

2 player

A Cranstone

Strong Positive Correlation

0.03

1 player

A Cranstone

2 player

P Scholfield

No Correlation

0.21

1 player

A Cranstone

2 player

P Franklin

Weak Positive Correlation

0.05

1 player

A Cranstone

2 player

D Gregory

No Correlation

0.42

1 player

A Cranstone

2 player

C Hill

Positive Correlation

0.34

1 player

A Cranstone

2 player

R Macdonald-Gay

Weak Positive Correlation

0.27

1 player

P Scholfield

2 player

S Dunkley

Weak Positive Correlation

0.19

1 player

P Scholfield

2 player

K Moore

No Correlation

0.35

1 player

P Scholfield

2 player

T Farrant

Weak Positive Correlation

0.19

1 player

P Scholfield

2 player

B Smith

No Correlation

0.03

1 player

P Scholfield

2 player

A Cranstone

No Correlation

1

1 player

P Scholfield

2 player

P Scholfield

Strong Positive Correlation

0.25

1 player

P Scholfield

2 player

P Franklin

Weak Positive Correlation

0.37

1 player

P Scholfield

2 player

D Gregory

Weak Positive Correlation

0.06

1 player

P Scholfield

2 player

C Hill

No Correlation

0.42

1 player

P Scholfield

2 player

R Macdonald-Gay

Positive Correlation

0.43

1 player

P Franklin

2 player

S Dunkley

Positive Correlation

-0.1

1 player

P Franklin

2 player

K Moore

No Correlation

0

1 player

P Franklin

2 player

T Farrant

No Correlation

0.43

1 player

P Franklin

2 player

B Smith

Positive Correlation

0.21

1 player

P Franklin

2 player

A Cranstone

Weak Positive Correlation

0.25

1 player

P Franklin

2 player

P Scholfield

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

P Franklin

2 player

P Franklin

Strong Positive Correlation

0.33

1 player

P Franklin

2 player

D Gregory

Weak Positive Correlation

0.32

1 player

P Franklin

2 player

C Hill

Weak Positive Correlation

0.25

1 player

P Franklin

2 player

R Macdonald-Gay

Weak Positive Correlation

0.32

1 player

D Gregory

2 player

S Dunkley

Weak Positive Correlation

0.11

1 player

D Gregory

2 player

K Moore

No Correlation

0.39

1 player

D Gregory

2 player

T Farrant

Weak Positive Correlation

0.16

1 player

D Gregory

2 player

B Smith

No Correlation

0.05

1 player

D Gregory

2 player

A Cranstone

No Correlation

0.37

1 player

D Gregory

2 player

P Scholfield

Weak Positive Correlation

0.33

1 player

D Gregory

2 player

P Franklin

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

D Gregory

2 player

D Gregory

Strong Positive Correlation

0.2

1 player

D Gregory

2 player

C Hill

Weak Positive Correlation

0.32

1 player

D Gregory

2 player

R Macdonald-Gay

Weak Positive Correlation

0.05

1 player

C Hill

2 player

S Dunkley

No Correlation

0.49

1 player

C Hill

2 player

K Moore

Positive Correlation

-0.12

1 player

C Hill

2 player

T Farrant

No Correlation

0.15

1 player

C Hill

2 player

B Smith

No Correlation

0.42

1 player

C Hill

2 player

A Cranstone

Positive Correlation

0.06

1 player

C Hill

2 player

P Scholfield

No Correlation

0.32

1 player

C Hill

2 player

P Franklin

Weak Positive Correlation

0.2

1 player

C Hill

2 player

D Gregory

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

C Hill

2 player

C Hill

Strong Positive Correlation

0.26

1 player

C Hill

2 player

R Macdonald-Gay

Weak Positive Correlation

0.3

1 player

R Macdonald-Gay

2 player

S Dunkley

Weak Positive Correlation

0.26

1 player

R Macdonald-Gay

2 player

K Moore

Weak Positive Correlation

0.3

1 player

R Macdonald-Gay

2 player

T Farrant

Weak Positive Correlation

0

1 player

R Macdonald-Gay

2 player

B Smith

No Correlation

0.34

1 player

R Macdonald-Gay

2 player

A Cranstone

Weak Positive Correlation

0.42

1 player

R Macdonald-Gay

2 player

P Scholfield

Positive Correlation

0.25

1 player

R Macdonald-Gay

2 player

P Franklin

Weak Positive Correlation

0.32

1 player

R Macdonald-Gay

2 player

D Gregory

Weak Positive Correlation

0.26

1 player

R Macdonald-Gay

2 player

C Hill

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

R Macdonald-Gay

2 player

R Macdonald-Gay

Strong Positive Correlation

Strong Positive Correlation

No Correlation

Strong Negative Correlation

No data found

Similar Perfomance

S Dunkley 0.43

P Franklin 0.43

P Scholfield 0.19

D Gregory 0.16

C Hill 0.15

T Farrant 0.07

Opposite Perfomance

K Moore -0.22

A Cranstone -0.15

Similar Perfomance

T Farrant 0.39

P Scholfield 0.37

P Franklin 0.33

S Dunkley 0.32

R Macdonald-Gay 0.32

C Hill 0.2

B Smith 0.16

K Moore 0.11

A Cranstone 0.05

Similar Perfomance

S Dunkley 0.43

B Smith 0.43

D Gregory 0.33

C Hill 0.32

P Scholfield 0.25

R Macdonald-Gay 0.25

A Cranstone 0.21

Opposite Perfomance

K Moore -0.1

Similar Perfomance

R Macdonald-Gay 0.42

D Gregory 0.37

T Farrant 0.35

S Dunkley 0.27

P Franklin 0.25

K Moore 0.19

B Smith 0.19

C Hill 0.06

A Cranstone 0.03

Similar Perfomance

D Gregory 0.39

P Scholfield 0.35

R Macdonald-Gay 0.3

K Moore 0.28

S Dunkley 0.11

B Smith 0.07

A Cranstone 0.06

Opposite Perfomance

C Hill -0.12

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

E Marlow BAT ND

L Winfield-Hill WK ND

G Hall BOW ND

E Burns AR ND

B Heath WK ND

K Levick BOW ND

H Armitage AR ND

S Kalis BAT ND

L Dobson BAT ND

R Slater BOW ND

K Fraser AR ND

E Marlow

L Winfield-Hill

G Hall

E Burns

B Heath

K Levick

H Armitage

S Kalis

L Dobson

R Slater

K Fraser

1

1 player

E Marlow

2 player

E Marlow

Strong Positive Correlation

0.11

1 player

E Marlow

2 player

L Winfield-Hill

No Correlation

-0.42

1 player

E Marlow

2 player

G Hall

Negative Correlation

-0.56

1 player

E Marlow

2 player

E Burns

Negative Correlation

0

1 player

E Marlow

2 player

B Heath

No Correlation

-0.38

1 player

E Marlow

2 player

K Levick

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.25

1 player

E Marlow

2 player

H Armitage

Weak Negative Correlation

0.14

1 player

E Marlow

2 player

S Kalis

No Correlation

0.33

1 player

E Marlow

2 player

L Dobson

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.29

1 player

E Marlow

2 player

R Slater

Weak Negative Correlation

0.2

1 player

E Marlow

2 player

K Fraser

Weak Positive Correlation

0.11

1 player

L Winfield-Hill

2 player

E Marlow

No Correlation

1

1 player

L Winfield-Hill

2 player

L Winfield-Hill

Strong Positive Correlation

0

1 player

L Winfield-Hill

2 player

G Hall

No Correlation

-0.43

1 player

L Winfield-Hill

2 player

E Burns

Negative Correlation

-0.12

1 player

L Winfield-Hill

2 player

B Heath

No Correlation

-0.33

1 player

L Winfield-Hill

2 player

K Levick

Weak Negative Correlation

0.44

1 player

L Winfield-Hill

2 player

H Armitage

Positive Correlation

-0.5

1 player

L Winfield-Hill

2 player

S Kalis

Negative Correlation

0.12

1 player

L Winfield-Hill

2 player

L Dobson

No Correlation

-0.09

1 player

L Winfield-Hill

2 player

R Slater

No Correlation

-0.08

1 player

L Winfield-Hill

2 player

K Fraser

No Correlation

-0.42

1 player

G Hall

2 player

E Marlow

Negative Correlation

0

1 player

G Hall

2 player

L Winfield-Hill

No Correlation

1

1 player

G Hall

2 player

G Hall

Strong Positive Correlation

0.42

1 player

G Hall

2 player

E Burns

Positive Correlation

0.09

1 player

G Hall

2 player

B Heath

No Correlation

0.33

1 player

G Hall

2 player

K Levick

Weak Positive Correlation

0

1 player

G Hall

2 player

H Armitage

No Correlation

-0.17

1 player

G Hall

2 player

S Kalis

No Correlation

-0.17

1 player

G Hall

2 player

L Dobson

No Correlation

-0.14

1 player

G Hall

2 player

R Slater

No Correlation

-0.45

1 player

G Hall

2 player

K Fraser

Negative Correlation

-0.56

1 player

E Burns

2 player

E Marlow

Negative Correlation

-0.43

1 player

E Burns

2 player

L Winfield-Hill

Negative Correlation

0.42

1 player

E Burns

2 player

G Hall

Positive Correlation

1

1 player

E Burns

2 player

E Burns

Strong Positive Correlation

0

1 player

E Burns

2 player

B Heath

No Correlation

0

1 player

E Burns

2 player

K Levick

No Correlation

0.2

1 player

E Burns

2 player

H Armitage

Weak Positive Correlation

0

1 player

E Burns

2 player

S Kalis

No Correlation

-0.56

1 player

E Burns

2 player

L Dobson

Negative Correlation

-0.11

1 player

E Burns

2 player

R Slater

No Correlation

0

1 player

E Burns

2 player

K Fraser

No Correlation

0

1 player

B Heath

2 player

E Marlow

No Correlation

-0.12

1 player

B Heath

2 player

L Winfield-Hill

No Correlation

0.09

1 player

B Heath

2 player

G Hall

No Correlation

0

1 player

B Heath

2 player

E Burns

No Correlation

1

1 player

B Heath

2 player

B Heath

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.04

1 player

B Heath

2 player

K Levick

No Correlation

-0.12

1 player

B Heath

2 player

H Armitage

No Correlation

0.08

1 player

B Heath

2 player

S Kalis

No Correlation

-0.18

1 player

B Heath

2 player

L Dobson

No Correlation

-0.2

1 player

B Heath

2 player

R Slater

No Correlation

0.2

1 player

B Heath

2 player

K Fraser

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.38

1 player

K Levick

2 player

E Marlow

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.33

1 player

K Levick

2 player

L Winfield-Hill

Weak Negative Correlation

0.33

1 player

K Levick

2 player

G Hall

Weak Positive Correlation

0

1 player

K Levick

2 player

E Burns

No Correlation

-0.04

1 player

K Levick

2 player

B Heath

No Correlation

1

1 player

K Levick

2 player

K Levick

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.17

1 player

K Levick

2 player

H Armitage

No Correlation

0.04

1 player

K Levick

2 player

S Kalis

No Correlation

-0.04

1 player

K Levick

2 player

L Dobson

No Correlation

-0.06

1 player

K Levick

2 player

R Slater

No Correlation

-0.12

1 player

K Levick

2 player

K Fraser

No Correlation

-0.25

1 player

H Armitage

2 player

E Marlow

Weak Negative Correlation

0.44

1 player

H Armitage

2 player

L Winfield-Hill

Positive Correlation

0

1 player

H Armitage

2 player

G Hall

No Correlation

0.2

1 player

H Armitage

2 player

E Burns

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.12

1 player

H Armitage

2 player

B Heath

No Correlation

-0.17

1 player

H Armitage

2 player

K Levick

No Correlation

1

1 player

H Armitage

2 player

H Armitage

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.48

1 player

H Armitage

2 player

S Kalis

Negative Correlation

-0.12

1 player

H Armitage

2 player

L Dobson

No Correlation

0.18

1 player

H Armitage

2 player

R Slater

No Correlation

-0.12

1 player

H Armitage

2 player

K Fraser

No Correlation

0.14

1 player

S Kalis

2 player

E Marlow

No Correlation

-0.5

1 player

S Kalis

2 player

L Winfield-Hill

Negative Correlation

-0.17

1 player

S Kalis

2 player

G Hall

No Correlation

0

1 player

S Kalis

2 player

E Burns

No Correlation

0.08

1 player

S Kalis

2 player

B Heath

No Correlation

0.04

1 player

S Kalis

2 player

K Levick

No Correlation

-0.48

1 player

S Kalis

2 player

H Armitage

Negative Correlation

1

1 player

S Kalis

2 player

S Kalis

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.28

1 player

S Kalis

2 player

L Dobson

Weak Negative Correlation

0.07

1 player

S Kalis

2 player

R Slater

No Correlation

0.12

1 player

S Kalis

2 player

K Fraser

No Correlation

0.33

1 player

L Dobson

2 player

E Marlow

Weak Positive Correlation

0.12

1 player

L Dobson

2 player

L Winfield-Hill

No Correlation

-0.17

1 player

L Dobson

2 player

G Hall

No Correlation

-0.56

1 player

L Dobson

2 player

E Burns

Negative Correlation

-0.18

1 player

L Dobson

2 player

B Heath

No Correlation

-0.04

1 player

L Dobson

2 player

K Levick

No Correlation

-0.12

1 player

L Dobson

2 player

H Armitage

No Correlation

-0.28

1 player

L Dobson

2 player

S Kalis

Weak Negative Correlation

1

1 player

L Dobson

2 player

L Dobson

Strong Positive Correlation

0.08

1 player

L Dobson

2 player

R Slater

No Correlation

0.07

1 player

L Dobson

2 player

K Fraser

No Correlation

-0.29

1 player

R Slater

2 player

E Marlow

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.09

1 player

R Slater

2 player

L Winfield-Hill

No Correlation

-0.14

1 player

R Slater

2 player

G Hall

No Correlation

-0.11

1 player

R Slater

2 player

E Burns

No Correlation

-0.2

1 player

R Slater

2 player

B Heath

No Correlation

-0.06

1 player

R Slater

2 player

K Levick

No Correlation

0.18

1 player

R Slater

2 player

H Armitage

No Correlation

0.07

1 player

R Slater

2 player

S Kalis

No Correlation

0.08

1 player

R Slater

2 player

L Dobson

No Correlation

1

1 player

R Slater

2 player

R Slater

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.4

1 player

R Slater

2 player

K Fraser

Weak Negative Correlation

0.2

1 player

K Fraser

2 player

E Marlow

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.08

1 player

K Fraser

2 player

L Winfield-Hill

No Correlation

-0.45

1 player

K Fraser

2 player

G Hall

Negative Correlation

0

1 player

K Fraser

2 player

E Burns

No Correlation

0.2

1 player

K Fraser

2 player

B Heath

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.12

1 player

K Fraser

2 player

K Levick

No Correlation

-0.12

1 player

K Fraser

2 player

H Armitage

No Correlation

0.12

1 player

K Fraser

2 player

S Kalis

No Correlation

0.07

1 player

K Fraser

2 player

L Dobson

No Correlation

-0.4

1 player

K Fraser

2 player

R Slater

Weak Negative Correlation

1

1 player

K Fraser

2 player

K Fraser

Strong Positive Correlation

Strong Positive Correlation

No Correlation

Strong Negative Correlation

No data found

Similar Perfomance

G Hall 0.33

S Kalis 0.04

Opposite Perfomance

E Marlow -0.38

L Winfield-Hill -0.33

H Armitage -0.17

K Fraser -0.12

R Slater -0.06

B Heath -0.04

L Dobson -0.04

Similar Perfomance

L Winfield-Hill 0.44

E Burns 0.2

R Slater 0.18

Opposite Perfomance

S Kalis -0.48

E Marlow -0.25

K Levick -0.17

B Heath -0.12

L Dobson -0.12

K Fraser -0.12

Similar Perfomance

K Fraser 0.2

G Hall 0.09

S Kalis 0.08

Opposite Perfomance

R Slater -0.2

L Dobson -0.18

L Winfield-Hill -0.12

H Armitage -0.12

K Levick -0.04

Similar Perfomance

E Marlow 0.14

K Fraser 0.12

B Heath 0.08

R Slater 0.07

K Levick 0.04

Opposite Perfomance

L Winfield-Hill -0.5

H Armitage -0.48

L Dobson -0.28

G Hall -0.17

Similar Perfomance

H Armitage 0.44

L Dobson 0.12

E Marlow 0.11

Opposite Perfomance

S Kalis -0.5

E Burns -0.43

K Levick -0.33

B Heath -0.12

R Slater -0.09

K Fraser -0.08

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

S Dunkley BAT SES

K Moore AR SES

TC Coleman BOW SES

T Farrant AR SES

B Smith AR SES

A Cranstone BAT SES

P Scholfield BAT SES

P Franklin AR SES

D Gregory BOW SES

C Hill WK SES

R Macdonald-Gay BOW SES

S Dunkley

K Moore

TC Coleman

T Farrant

B Smith

A Cranstone

P Scholfield

P Franklin

D Gregory

C Hill

R Macdonald-Gay

1

1 player

S Dunkley

2 player

S Dunkley

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.25

1 player

S Dunkley

2 player

K Moore

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.14

1 player

S Dunkley

2 player

T Farrant

No Correlation

0.17

1 player

S Dunkley

2 player

B Smith

No Correlation

0.14

1 player

S Dunkley

2 player

A Cranstone

No Correlation

0.11

1 player

S Dunkley

2 player

P Scholfield

No Correlation

0

1 player

S Dunkley

2 player

P Franklin

No Correlation

-0.17

1 player

S Dunkley

2 player

D Gregory

No Correlation

0

1 player

S Dunkley

2 player

C Hill

No Correlation

-0.11

1 player

S Dunkley

2 player

R Macdonald-Gay

No Correlation

-0.25

1 player

K Moore

2 player

S Dunkley

Weak Negative Correlation

1

1 player

K Moore

2 player

K Moore

Strong Positive Correlation

0.11

1 player

K Moore

2 player

T Farrant

No Correlation

-0.5

1 player

K Moore

2 player

B Smith

Negative Correlation

0.43

1 player

K Moore

2 player

A Cranstone

Positive Correlation

0.2

1 player

K Moore

2 player

P Scholfield

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.5

1 player

K Moore

2 player

P Franklin

Negative Correlation

-0.17

1 player

K Moore

2 player

D Gregory

No Correlation

0.5

1 player

K Moore

2 player

C Hill

Positive Correlation

0.45

1 player

K Moore

2 player

R Macdonald-Gay

Positive Correlation

-0.14

1 player

T Farrant

2 player

S Dunkley

No Correlation

0.11

1 player

T Farrant

2 player

K Moore

No Correlation

1

1 player

T Farrant

2 player

T Farrant

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.29

1 player

T Farrant

2 player

B Smith

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.11

1 player

T Farrant

2 player

A Cranstone

No Correlation

-0.45

1 player

T Farrant

2 player

P Scholfield

Negative Correlation

-0.08

1 player

T Farrant

2 player

P Franklin

No Correlation

0.29

1 player

T Farrant

2 player

D Gregory

Weak Positive Correlation

-1

1 player

T Farrant

2 player

C Hill

Strong Negative Correlation

0.56

1 player

T Farrant

2 player

R Macdonald-Gay

Positive Correlation

0.17

1 player

B Smith

2 player

S Dunkley

No Correlation

-0.5

1 player

B Smith

2 player

K Moore

Negative Correlation

-0.29

1 player

B Smith

2 player

T Farrant

Weak Negative Correlation

1

1 player

B Smith

2 player

B Smith

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.16

1 player

B Smith

2 player

A Cranstone

No Correlation

-0.07

1 player

B Smith

2 player

P Scholfield

No Correlation

0.76

1 player

B Smith

2 player

P Franklin

Positive Correlation

-0.15

1 player

B Smith

2 player

D Gregory

No Correlation

-0.2

1 player

B Smith

2 player

C Hill

No Correlation

-0.86

1 player

B Smith

2 player

R Macdonald-Gay

Strong Negative Correlation

0.14

1 player

A Cranstone

2 player

S Dunkley

No Correlation

0.43

1 player

A Cranstone

2 player

K Moore

Positive Correlation

-0.11

1 player

A Cranstone

2 player

T Farrant

No Correlation

-0.16

1 player

A Cranstone

2 player

B Smith

No Correlation

1

1 player

A Cranstone

2 player

A Cranstone

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.5

1 player

A Cranstone

2 player

P Scholfield

Negative Correlation

-0.18

1 player

A Cranstone

2 player

P Franklin

No Correlation

-0.22

1 player

A Cranstone

2 player

D Gregory

Weak Negative Correlation

0.33

1 player

A Cranstone

2 player

C Hill

Weak Positive Correlation

0.4

1 player

A Cranstone

2 player

R Macdonald-Gay

Positive Correlation

0.11

1 player

P Scholfield

2 player

S Dunkley

No Correlation

0.2

1 player

P Scholfield

2 player

K Moore

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.45

1 player

P Scholfield

2 player

T Farrant

Negative Correlation

-0.07

1 player

P Scholfield

2 player

B Smith

No Correlation

-0.5

1 player

P Scholfield

2 player

A Cranstone

Negative Correlation

1

1 player

P Scholfield

2 player

P Scholfield

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.2

1 player

P Scholfield

2 player

P Franklin

No Correlation

-0.2

1 player

P Scholfield

2 player

D Gregory

No Correlation

0.14

1 player

P Scholfield

2 player

C Hill

No Correlation

0

1 player

P Scholfield

2 player

R Macdonald-Gay

No Correlation

0

1 player

P Franklin

2 player

S Dunkley

No Correlation

-0.5

1 player

P Franklin

2 player

K Moore

Negative Correlation

-0.08

1 player

P Franklin

2 player

T Farrant

No Correlation

0.76

1 player

P Franklin

2 player

B Smith

Positive Correlation

-0.18

1 player

P Franklin

2 player

A Cranstone

No Correlation

-0.2

1 player

P Franklin

2 player

P Scholfield

No Correlation

1

1 player

P Franklin

2 player

P Franklin

Strong Positive Correlation

0.08

1 player

P Franklin

2 player

D Gregory

No Correlation

-0.11

1 player

P Franklin

2 player

C Hill

No Correlation

-0.57

1 player

P Franklin

2 player

R Macdonald-Gay

Negative Correlation

-0.17

1 player

D Gregory

2 player

S Dunkley

No Correlation

-0.17

1 player

D Gregory

2 player

K Moore

No Correlation

0.29

1 player

D Gregory

2 player

T Farrant

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.15

1 player

D Gregory

2 player

B Smith

No Correlation

-0.22

1 player

D Gregory

2 player

A Cranstone

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.2

1 player

D Gregory

2 player

P Scholfield

No Correlation

0.08

1 player

D Gregory

2 player

P Franklin

No Correlation

1

1 player

D Gregory

2 player

D Gregory

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.4

1 player

D Gregory

2 player

C Hill

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.08

1 player

D Gregory

2 player

R Macdonald-Gay

No Correlation

0

1 player

C Hill

2 player

S Dunkley

No Correlation

0.5

1 player

C Hill

2 player

K Moore

Positive Correlation

-1

1 player

C Hill

2 player

T Farrant

Strong Negative Correlation

-0.2

1 player

C Hill

2 player

B Smith

No Correlation

0.33

1 player

C Hill

2 player

A Cranstone

Weak Positive Correlation

0.14

1 player

C Hill

2 player

P Scholfield

No Correlation

-0.11

1 player

C Hill

2 player

P Franklin

No Correlation

-0.4

1 player

C Hill

2 player

D Gregory

Weak Negative Correlation

1

1 player

C Hill

2 player

C Hill

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.14

1 player

C Hill

2 player

R Macdonald-Gay

No Correlation

-0.11

1 player

R Macdonald-Gay

2 player

S Dunkley

No Correlation

0.45

1 player

R Macdonald-Gay

2 player

K Moore

Positive Correlation

0.56

1 player

R Macdonald-Gay

2 player

T Farrant

Positive Correlation

-0.86

1 player

R Macdonald-Gay

2 player

B Smith

Strong Negative Correlation

0.4

1 player

R Macdonald-Gay

2 player

A Cranstone

Positive Correlation

0

1 player

R Macdonald-Gay

2 player

P Scholfield

No Correlation

-0.57

1 player

R Macdonald-Gay

2 player

P Franklin

Negative Correlation

-0.08

1 player

R Macdonald-Gay

2 player

D Gregory

No Correlation

-0.14

1 player

R Macdonald-Gay

2 player

C Hill

No Correlation

1

1 player

R Macdonald-Gay

2 player

R Macdonald-Gay

Strong Positive Correlation

Strong Positive Correlation

No Correlation

Strong Negative Correlation

Pick **B Smith** and **P Franklin** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **T Farrant** and **C Hill** together

Strong Negative Correlation

Pick **B Smith** and **R Macdonald-Gay** together

Strong Negative Correlation

Similar Perfomance

P Franklin 0.76

S Dunkley 0.17

Opposite Perfomance

R Macdonald-Gay -0.86

K Moore -0.5

T Farrant -0.29

C Hill -0.2

A Cranstone -0.16

D Gregory -0.15

P Scholfield -0.07

Similar Perfomance

B Smith 0.76

D Gregory 0.08

Opposite Perfomance

R Macdonald-Gay -0.57

K Moore -0.5

P Scholfield -0.2

A Cranstone -0.18

C Hill -0.11

T Farrant -0.08

Similar Perfomance

T Farrant 0.29

P Franklin 0.08

Opposite Perfomance

C Hill -0.4

A Cranstone -0.22

P Scholfield -0.2

S Dunkley -0.17

K Moore -0.17

B Smith -0.15

R Macdonald-Gay -0.08

Similar Perfomance

K Moore 0.2

C Hill 0.14

S Dunkley 0.11

Opposite Perfomance

A Cranstone -0.5

T Farrant -0.45

P Franklin -0.2

D Gregory -0.2

B Smith -0.07

Similar Perfomance

T Farrant 0.56

K Moore 0.45

A Cranstone 0.4

Opposite Perfomance

B Smith -0.86

P Franklin -0.57

C Hill -0.14

S Dunkley -0.11

D Gregory -0.08