ND 31 May 07:00 pm SES

Lineup Out

Riverside Ground, Chester-le-Street
Charlotte Edwards Cup

Best Player Combinations For
ND vs SES

How it Works?

This guide is super useful for identifying player combinations that are likely to score big. Use the filters to identify the best player combinations according to specific match scenarios.

Player correlate positively

Both players generally perform similarly when picked together. They either score high together or score low together. Maximise FPts by picking players that correlate positively with top players.

Player correlate negatively

Both players generally perform in an opposite manner. If one player scores high, the other usually scores low. Avoid picking players that correlate negatively with top player

Show Player Combinations on the basis of:

Best ND Player Combinations

Best ND Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad
E Marlow BAT ND
L Winfield-Hill WK ND
G Hall BOW ND
E Burns AR ND
B Heath WK ND
K Levick BOW ND
H Armitage AR ND
S Kalis BAT ND
L Dobson BAT ND
R Slater BOW ND
K Fraser AR ND
E Marlow
L Winfield-Hill
G Hall
E Burns
B Heath
K Levick
H Armitage
S Kalis
L Dobson
R Slater
K Fraser
1
1 player
E Marlow
2 player
E Marlow
Strong Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
E Marlow
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
Weak Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
E Marlow
2 player
G Hall
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.13
1 player
E Marlow
2 player
E Burns
No Correlation
0.46
1 player
E Marlow
2 player
B Heath
Positive Correlation
-0.11
1 player
E Marlow
2 player
K Levick
No Correlation
0.04
1 player
E Marlow
2 player
H Armitage
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
E Marlow
2 player
S Kalis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
E Marlow
2 player
L Dobson
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.05
1 player
E Marlow
2 player
R Slater
No Correlation
0.32
1 player
E Marlow
2 player
K Fraser
Weak Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
E Marlow
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
Strong Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
G Hall
No Correlation
-0.01
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
E Burns
No Correlation
0.26
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
B Heath
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.08
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
K Levick
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
H Armitage
Weak Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
S Kalis
No Correlation
0.3
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
L Dobson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.06
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
R Slater
No Correlation
0.16
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
K Fraser
No Correlation
0.26
1 player
G Hall
2 player
E Marlow
Weak Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
G Hall
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
No Correlation
1
1 player
G Hall
2 player
G Hall
Strong Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
G Hall
2 player
E Burns
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
G Hall
2 player
B Heath
Weak Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
G Hall
2 player
K Levick
Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
G Hall
2 player
H Armitage
Weak Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
G Hall
2 player
S Kalis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
G Hall
2 player
L Dobson
No Correlation
0.36
1 player
G Hall
2 player
R Slater
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
G Hall
2 player
K Fraser
No Correlation
-0.13
1 player
E Burns
2 player
E Marlow
No Correlation
-0.01
1 player
E Burns
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
No Correlation
0.3
1 player
E Burns
2 player
G Hall
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
E Burns
2 player
E Burns
Strong Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
E Burns
2 player
B Heath
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
E Burns
2 player
K Levick
Weak Positive Correlation
0.01
1 player
E Burns
2 player
H Armitage
No Correlation
0.12
1 player
E Burns
2 player
S Kalis
No Correlation
-0.09
1 player
E Burns
2 player
L Dobson
No Correlation
0.09
1 player
E Burns
2 player
R Slater
No Correlation
0.32
1 player
E Burns
2 player
K Fraser
Weak Positive Correlation
0.46
1 player
B Heath
2 player
E Marlow
Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
B Heath
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
B Heath
2 player
G Hall
Weak Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
B Heath
2 player
E Burns
No Correlation
1
1 player
B Heath
2 player
B Heath
Strong Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
B Heath
2 player
K Levick
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
B Heath
2 player
H Armitage
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
B Heath
2 player
S Kalis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
B Heath
2 player
L Dobson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
B Heath
2 player
R Slater
Weak Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
B Heath
2 player
K Fraser
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.11
1 player
K Levick
2 player
E Marlow
No Correlation
-0.08
1 player
K Levick
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
K Levick
2 player
G Hall
Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
K Levick
2 player
E Burns
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
K Levick
2 player
B Heath
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
K Levick
2 player
K Levick
Strong Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
K Levick
2 player
H Armitage
No Correlation
0.24
1 player
K Levick
2 player
S Kalis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
K Levick
2 player
L Dobson
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
K Levick
2 player
R Slater
Weak Positive Correlation
0.19
1 player
K Levick
2 player
K Fraser
No Correlation
0.04
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
E Marlow
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
Weak Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
G Hall
Weak Positive Correlation
0.01
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
E Burns
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
B Heath
No Correlation
0.1
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
K Levick
No Correlation
1
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
H Armitage
Strong Positive Correlation
0.06
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
S Kalis
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
L Dobson
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
R Slater
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.04
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
K Fraser
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
S Kalis
2 player
E Marlow
Weak Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
S Kalis
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
No Correlation
0.22
1 player
S Kalis
2 player
G Hall
Weak Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
S Kalis
2 player
E Burns
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
S Kalis
2 player
B Heath
Weak Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
S Kalis
2 player
K Levick
Weak Positive Correlation
0.06
1 player
S Kalis
2 player
H Armitage
No Correlation
1
1 player
S Kalis
2 player
S Kalis
Strong Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
S Kalis
2 player
L Dobson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
S Kalis
2 player
R Slater
Weak Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
S Kalis
2 player
K Fraser
Weak Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
L Dobson
2 player
E Marlow
Weak Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
L Dobson
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
Weak Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
L Dobson
2 player
G Hall
No Correlation
-0.09
1 player
L Dobson
2 player
E Burns
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
L Dobson
2 player
B Heath
Weak Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
L Dobson
2 player
K Levick
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
L Dobson
2 player
H Armitage
No Correlation
0.21
1 player
L Dobson
2 player
S Kalis
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
L Dobson
2 player
L Dobson
Strong Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
L Dobson
2 player
R Slater
Weak Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
L Dobson
2 player
K Fraser
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.05
1 player
R Slater
2 player
E Marlow
No Correlation
0.06
1 player
R Slater
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
No Correlation
0.36
1 player
R Slater
2 player
G Hall
Weak Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
R Slater
2 player
E Burns
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
R Slater
2 player
B Heath
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
R Slater
2 player
K Levick
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
R Slater
2 player
H Armitage
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
R Slater
2 player
S Kalis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
R Slater
2 player
L Dobson
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
R Slater
2 player
R Slater
Strong Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
R Slater
2 player
K Fraser
No Correlation
0.32
1 player
K Fraser
2 player
E Marlow
Weak Positive Correlation
0.16
1 player
K Fraser
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
No Correlation
0
1 player
K Fraser
2 player
G Hall
No Correlation
0.32
1 player
K Fraser
2 player
E Burns
Weak Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
K Fraser
2 player
B Heath
Weak Positive Correlation
0.19
1 player
K Fraser
2 player
K Levick
No Correlation
-0.04
1 player
K Fraser
2 player
H Armitage
No Correlation
0.38
1 player
K Fraser
2 player
S Kalis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
K Fraser
2 player
L Dobson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
K Fraser
2 player
R Slater
No Correlation
1
1 player
K Fraser
2 player
K Fraser
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

No data found

High Performing Players

1 K Levick

BOW
Similar Perfomance
G Hall 0.42
B Heath 0.28
R Slater 0.28
E Burns 0.25
S Kalis 0.24
K Fraser 0.19
L Dobson 0.12
H Armitage 0.1
Opposite Perfomance
E Marlow -0.11
L Winfield-Hill -0.08

2 H Armitage

AR
Similar Perfomance
R Slater 0.35
L Winfield-Hill 0.33
G Hall 0.27
B Heath 0.14
L Dobson 0.14
K Levick 0.1
S Kalis 0.06
E Marlow 0.04
E Burns 0.01
Opposite Perfomance
K Fraser -0.04

3 B Heath

WK
Similar Perfomance
E Marlow 0.46
S Kalis 0.33
K Levick 0.28
L Winfield-Hill 0.26
L Dobson 0.25
G Hall 0.23
R Slater 0.23
K Fraser 0.21
E Burns 0.15
H Armitage 0.14

4 L Winfield-Hill

WK
Similar Perfomance
H Armitage 0.33
E Marlow 0.31
L Dobson 0.3
B Heath 0.26
G Hall 0.18
K Fraser 0.16
S Kalis 0.08
R Slater 0.06
Opposite Perfomance
K Levick -0.08
E Burns -0.01

5 E Burns

AR
Similar Perfomance
K Fraser 0.32
G Hall 0.3
K Levick 0.25
B Heath 0.15
S Kalis 0.12
R Slater 0.09
H Armitage 0.01
Opposite Perfomance
E Marlow -0.13
L Dobson -0.09
L Winfield-Hill -0.01

Best SES Player Combinations

Best SES Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad
S Dunkley BAT SES
K Moore AR SES
TC Coleman BOW SES
T Farrant AR SES
B Smith AR SES
A Cranstone BAT SES
P Scholfield BAT SES
P Franklin AR SES
D Gregory BOW SES
C Hill WK SES
R Macdonald-Gay BOW SES
S Dunkley
K Moore
TC Coleman
T Farrant
B Smith
A Cranstone
P Scholfield
P Franklin
D Gregory
C Hill
R Macdonald-Gay
1
1 player
S Dunkley
2 player
S Dunkley
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.2
1 player
S Dunkley
2 player
K Moore
No Correlation
0.12
1 player
S Dunkley
2 player
TC Coleman
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
S Dunkley
2 player
T Farrant
No Correlation
0.43
1 player
S Dunkley
2 player
B Smith
Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
S Dunkley
2 player
A Cranstone
Weak Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
S Dunkley
2 player
P Scholfield
Weak Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
S Dunkley
2 player
P Franklin
Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
S Dunkley
2 player
D Gregory
Weak Positive Correlation
0.05
1 player
S Dunkley
2 player
C Hill
No Correlation
0.3
1 player
S Dunkley
2 player
R Macdonald-Gay
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.2
1 player
K Moore
2 player
S Dunkley
No Correlation
1
1 player
K Moore
2 player
K Moore
Strong Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
K Moore
2 player
TC Coleman
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
K Moore
2 player
T Farrant
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.22
1 player
K Moore
2 player
B Smith
Weak Negative Correlation
0.47
1 player
K Moore
2 player
A Cranstone
Positive Correlation
0.19
1 player
K Moore
2 player
P Scholfield
No Correlation
-0.1
1 player
K Moore
2 player
P Franklin
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
K Moore
2 player
D Gregory
No Correlation
0.49
1 player
K Moore
2 player
C Hill
Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
K Moore
2 player
R Macdonald-Gay
Weak Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
TC Coleman
2 player
S Dunkley
No Correlation
0.1
1 player
TC Coleman
2 player
K Moore
No Correlation
1
1 player
TC Coleman
2 player
TC Coleman
Strong Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
TC Coleman
2 player
T Farrant
Weak Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
TC Coleman
2 player
B Smith
No Correlation
-0.18
1 player
TC Coleman
2 player
A Cranstone
No Correlation
0.03
1 player
TC Coleman
2 player
P Scholfield
No Correlation
-0.09
1 player
TC Coleman
2 player
P Franklin
No Correlation
0.1
1 player
TC Coleman
2 player
D Gregory
No Correlation
-0.07
1 player
TC Coleman
2 player
C Hill
No Correlation
0.39
1 player
TC Coleman
2 player
R Macdonald-Gay
Weak Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
T Farrant
2 player
S Dunkley
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
T Farrant
2 player
K Moore
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
T Farrant
2 player
TC Coleman
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
T Farrant
2 player
T Farrant
Strong Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
T Farrant
2 player
B Smith
No Correlation
0.06
1 player
T Farrant
2 player
A Cranstone
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
T Farrant
2 player
P Scholfield
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
T Farrant
2 player
P Franklin
No Correlation
0.39
1 player
T Farrant
2 player
D Gregory
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.12
1 player
T Farrant
2 player
C Hill
No Correlation
0.3
1 player
T Farrant
2 player
R Macdonald-Gay
Weak Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
B Smith
2 player
S Dunkley
Positive Correlation
-0.22
1 player
B Smith
2 player
K Moore
Weak Negative Correlation
0.09
1 player
B Smith
2 player
TC Coleman
No Correlation
0.07
1 player
B Smith
2 player
T Farrant
No Correlation
1
1 player
B Smith
2 player
B Smith
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.15
1 player
B Smith
2 player
A Cranstone
No Correlation
0.19
1 player
B Smith
2 player
P Scholfield
No Correlation
0.43
1 player
B Smith
2 player
P Franklin
Positive Correlation
0.16
1 player
B Smith
2 player
D Gregory
No Correlation
0.15
1 player
B Smith
2 player
C Hill
No Correlation
0
1 player
B Smith
2 player
R Macdonald-Gay
No Correlation
0.31
1 player
A Cranstone
2 player
S Dunkley
Weak Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
A Cranstone
2 player
K Moore
Positive Correlation
-0.18
1 player
A Cranstone
2 player
TC Coleman
No Correlation
0.06
1 player
A Cranstone
2 player
T Farrant
No Correlation
-0.15
1 player
A Cranstone
2 player
B Smith
No Correlation
1
1 player
A Cranstone
2 player
A Cranstone
Strong Positive Correlation
0.03
1 player
A Cranstone
2 player
P Scholfield
No Correlation
0.21
1 player
A Cranstone
2 player
P Franklin
Weak Positive Correlation
0.05
1 player
A Cranstone
2 player
D Gregory
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
A Cranstone
2 player
C Hill
Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
A Cranstone
2 player
R Macdonald-Gay
Weak Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
P Scholfield
2 player
S Dunkley
Weak Positive Correlation
0.19
1 player
P Scholfield
2 player
K Moore
No Correlation
0.03
1 player
P Scholfield
2 player
TC Coleman
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
P Scholfield
2 player
T Farrant
Weak Positive Correlation
0.19
1 player
P Scholfield
2 player
B Smith
No Correlation
0.03
1 player
P Scholfield
2 player
A Cranstone
No Correlation
1
1 player
P Scholfield
2 player
P Scholfield
Strong Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
P Scholfield
2 player
P Franklin
Weak Positive Correlation
0.37
1 player
P Scholfield
2 player
D Gregory
Weak Positive Correlation
0.06
1 player
P Scholfield
2 player
C Hill
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
P Scholfield
2 player
R Macdonald-Gay
Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
P Franklin
2 player
S Dunkley
Positive Correlation
-0.1
1 player
P Franklin
2 player
K Moore
No Correlation
-0.09
1 player
P Franklin
2 player
TC Coleman
No Correlation
0
1 player
P Franklin
2 player
T Farrant
No Correlation
0.43
1 player
P Franklin
2 player
B Smith
Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
P Franklin
2 player
A Cranstone
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
P Franklin
2 player
P Scholfield
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
P Franklin
2 player
P Franklin
Strong Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
P Franklin
2 player
D Gregory
Weak Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
P Franklin
2 player
C Hill
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
P Franklin
2 player
R Macdonald-Gay
Weak Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
D Gregory
2 player
S Dunkley
Weak Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
D Gregory
2 player
K Moore
No Correlation
0.1
1 player
D Gregory
2 player
TC Coleman
No Correlation
0.39
1 player
D Gregory
2 player
T Farrant
Weak Positive Correlation
0.16
1 player
D Gregory
2 player
B Smith
No Correlation
0.05
1 player
D Gregory
2 player
A Cranstone
No Correlation
0.37
1 player
D Gregory
2 player
P Scholfield
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
D Gregory
2 player
P Franklin
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
D Gregory
2 player
D Gregory
Strong Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
D Gregory
2 player
C Hill
Weak Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
D Gregory
2 player
R Macdonald-Gay
Weak Positive Correlation
0.05
1 player
C Hill
2 player
S Dunkley
No Correlation
0.49
1 player
C Hill
2 player
K Moore
Positive Correlation
-0.07
1 player
C Hill
2 player
TC Coleman
No Correlation
-0.12
1 player
C Hill
2 player
T Farrant
No Correlation
0.15
1 player
C Hill
2 player
B Smith
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
C Hill
2 player
A Cranstone
Positive Correlation
0.06
1 player
C Hill
2 player
P Scholfield
No Correlation
0.32
1 player
C Hill
2 player
P Franklin
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
C Hill
2 player
D Gregory
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
C Hill
2 player
C Hill
Strong Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
C Hill
2 player
R Macdonald-Gay
Weak Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
R Macdonald-Gay
2 player
S Dunkley
Weak Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
R Macdonald-Gay
2 player
K Moore
Weak Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
R Macdonald-Gay
2 player
TC Coleman
Weak Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
R Macdonald-Gay
2 player
T Farrant
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
R Macdonald-Gay
2 player
B Smith
No Correlation
0.34
1 player
R Macdonald-Gay
2 player
A Cranstone
Weak Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
R Macdonald-Gay
2 player
P Scholfield
Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
R Macdonald-Gay
2 player
P Franklin
Weak Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
R Macdonald-Gay
2 player
D Gregory
Weak Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
R Macdonald-Gay
2 player
C Hill
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
R Macdonald-Gay
2 player
R Macdonald-Gay
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

No data found

High Performing Players

1 B Smith

AR
Similar Perfomance
S Dunkley 0.43
P Franklin 0.43
P Scholfield 0.19
D Gregory 0.16
C Hill 0.15
TC Coleman 0.09
T Farrant 0.07
Opposite Perfomance
K Moore -0.22
A Cranstone -0.15

2 D Gregory

BOW
Similar Perfomance
T Farrant 0.39
P Scholfield 0.37
P Franklin 0.33
S Dunkley 0.32
R Macdonald-Gay 0.32
C Hill 0.2
B Smith 0.16
K Moore 0.11
TC Coleman 0.1
A Cranstone 0.05

3 P Franklin

AR
Similar Perfomance
S Dunkley 0.43
B Smith 0.43
D Gregory 0.33
C Hill 0.32
P Scholfield 0.25
R Macdonald-Gay 0.25
A Cranstone 0.21
Opposite Perfomance
K Moore -0.1
TC Coleman -0.09

4 P Scholfield

BAT
Similar Perfomance
R Macdonald-Gay 0.42
D Gregory 0.37
T Farrant 0.35
S Dunkley 0.27
P Franklin 0.25
K Moore 0.19
B Smith 0.19
C Hill 0.06
TC Coleman 0.03
A Cranstone 0.03

5 T Farrant

AR
Similar Perfomance
D Gregory 0.39
P Scholfield 0.35
R Macdonald-Gay 0.3
K Moore 0.28
TC Coleman 0.25
S Dunkley 0.11
B Smith 0.07
A Cranstone 0.06
Opposite Perfomance
C Hill -0.12

Best ND Player Combinations

Best ND Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad
E Marlow BAT ND
L Winfield-Hill WK ND
G Hall BOW ND
E Burns AR ND
B Heath WK ND
K Levick BOW ND
H Armitage AR ND
S Kalis BAT ND
L Dobson BAT ND
R Slater BOW ND
K Fraser AR ND
E Marlow
L Winfield-Hill
G Hall
E Burns
B Heath
K Levick
H Armitage
S Kalis
L Dobson
R Slater
K Fraser
1
1 player
E Marlow
2 player
E Marlow
Strong Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
E Marlow
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
No Correlation
-0.42
1 player
E Marlow
2 player
G Hall
Negative Correlation
-0.56
1 player
E Marlow
2 player
E Burns
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
E Marlow
2 player
B Heath
No Correlation
-0.38
1 player
E Marlow
2 player
K Levick
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.25
1 player
E Marlow
2 player
H Armitage
Weak Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
E Marlow
2 player
S Kalis
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
E Marlow
2 player
L Dobson
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.29
1 player
E Marlow
2 player
R Slater
Weak Negative Correlation
0.2
1 player
E Marlow
2 player
K Fraser
Weak Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
E Marlow
No Correlation
1
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
G Hall
No Correlation
-0.43
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
E Burns
Negative Correlation
-0.12
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
B Heath
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
K Levick
Weak Negative Correlation
0.44
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
H Armitage
Positive Correlation
-0.5
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
S Kalis
Negative Correlation
0.12
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
L Dobson
No Correlation
-0.09
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
R Slater
No Correlation
-0.08
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
K Fraser
No Correlation
-0.42
1 player
G Hall
2 player
E Marlow
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
G Hall
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
No Correlation
1
1 player
G Hall
2 player
G Hall
Strong Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
G Hall
2 player
E Burns
Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
G Hall
2 player
B Heath
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
G Hall
2 player
K Levick
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
G Hall
2 player
H Armitage
No Correlation
-0.17
1 player
G Hall
2 player
S Kalis
No Correlation
-0.17
1 player
G Hall
2 player
L Dobson
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
G Hall
2 player
R Slater
No Correlation
-0.45
1 player
G Hall
2 player
K Fraser
Negative Correlation
-0.56
1 player
E Burns
2 player
E Marlow
Negative Correlation
-0.43
1 player
E Burns
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
Negative Correlation
0.42
1 player
E Burns
2 player
G Hall
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
E Burns
2 player
E Burns
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
E Burns
2 player
B Heath
No Correlation
0
1 player
E Burns
2 player
K Levick
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
E Burns
2 player
H Armitage
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
E Burns
2 player
S Kalis
No Correlation
-0.56
1 player
E Burns
2 player
L Dobson
Negative Correlation
-0.11
1 player
E Burns
2 player
R Slater
No Correlation
0
1 player
E Burns
2 player
K Fraser
No Correlation
0
1 player
B Heath
2 player
E Marlow
No Correlation
-0.12
1 player
B Heath
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
No Correlation
0.09
1 player
B Heath
2 player
G Hall
No Correlation
0
1 player
B Heath
2 player
E Burns
No Correlation
1
1 player
B Heath
2 player
B Heath
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.04
1 player
B Heath
2 player
K Levick
No Correlation
-0.12
1 player
B Heath
2 player
H Armitage
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
B Heath
2 player
S Kalis
No Correlation
-0.18
1 player
B Heath
2 player
L Dobson
No Correlation
-0.2
1 player
B Heath
2 player
R Slater
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
B Heath
2 player
K Fraser
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.38
1 player
K Levick
2 player
E Marlow
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
K Levick
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
Weak Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
K Levick
2 player
G Hall
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
K Levick
2 player
E Burns
No Correlation
-0.04
1 player
K Levick
2 player
B Heath
No Correlation
1
1 player
K Levick
2 player
K Levick
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.17
1 player
K Levick
2 player
H Armitage
No Correlation
0.04
1 player
K Levick
2 player
S Kalis
No Correlation
-0.04
1 player
K Levick
2 player
L Dobson
No Correlation
-0.06
1 player
K Levick
2 player
R Slater
No Correlation
-0.12
1 player
K Levick
2 player
K Fraser
No Correlation
-0.25
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
E Marlow
Weak Negative Correlation
0.44
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
G Hall
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
E Burns
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.12
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
B Heath
No Correlation
-0.17
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
K Levick
No Correlation
1
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
H Armitage
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.48
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
S Kalis
Negative Correlation
-0.12
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
L Dobson
No Correlation
0.18
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
R Slater
No Correlation
-0.12
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
K Fraser
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
S Kalis
2 player
E Marlow
No Correlation
-0.5
1 player
S Kalis
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
Negative Correlation
-0.17
1 player
S Kalis
2 player
G Hall
No Correlation
0
1 player
S Kalis
2 player
E Burns
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
S Kalis
2 player
B Heath
No Correlation
0.04
1 player
S Kalis
2 player
K Levick
No Correlation
-0.48
1 player
S Kalis
2 player
H Armitage
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
S Kalis
2 player
S Kalis
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.28
1 player
S Kalis
2 player
L Dobson
Weak Negative Correlation
0.07
1 player
S Kalis
2 player
R Slater
No Correlation
0.12
1 player
S Kalis
2 player
K Fraser
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
L Dobson
2 player
E Marlow
Weak Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
L Dobson
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
No Correlation
-0.17
1 player
L Dobson
2 player
G Hall
No Correlation
-0.56
1 player
L Dobson
2 player
E Burns
Negative Correlation
-0.18
1 player
L Dobson
2 player
B Heath
No Correlation
-0.04
1 player
L Dobson
2 player
K Levick
No Correlation
-0.12
1 player
L Dobson
2 player
H Armitage
No Correlation
-0.28
1 player
L Dobson
2 player
S Kalis
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
L Dobson
2 player
L Dobson
Strong Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
L Dobson
2 player
R Slater
No Correlation
0.07
1 player
L Dobson
2 player
K Fraser
No Correlation
-0.29
1 player
R Slater
2 player
E Marlow
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.09
1 player
R Slater
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
R Slater
2 player
G Hall
No Correlation
-0.11
1 player
R Slater
2 player
E Burns
No Correlation
-0.2
1 player
R Slater
2 player
B Heath
No Correlation
-0.06
1 player
R Slater
2 player
K Levick
No Correlation
0.18
1 player
R Slater
2 player
H Armitage
No Correlation
0.07
1 player
R Slater
2 player
S Kalis
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
R Slater
2 player
L Dobson
No Correlation
1
1 player
R Slater
2 player
R Slater
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.4
1 player
R Slater
2 player
K Fraser
Weak Negative Correlation
0.2
1 player
K Fraser
2 player
E Marlow
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.08
1 player
K Fraser
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
No Correlation
-0.45
1 player
K Fraser
2 player
G Hall
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
K Fraser
2 player
E Burns
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
K Fraser
2 player
B Heath
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.12
1 player
K Fraser
2 player
K Levick
No Correlation
-0.12
1 player
K Fraser
2 player
H Armitage
No Correlation
0.12
1 player
K Fraser
2 player
S Kalis
No Correlation
0.07
1 player
K Fraser
2 player
L Dobson
No Correlation
-0.4
1 player
K Fraser
2 player
R Slater
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
K Fraser
2 player
K Fraser
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

No data found

High Performing Players

1 K Levick

BOW
Similar Perfomance
G Hall 0.33
S Kalis 0.04
Opposite Perfomance
E Marlow -0.38
L Winfield-Hill -0.33
H Armitage -0.17
K Fraser -0.12
R Slater -0.06
B Heath -0.04
L Dobson -0.04

2 H Armitage

AR
Similar Perfomance
L Winfield-Hill 0.44
E Burns 0.2
R Slater 0.18
Opposite Perfomance
S Kalis -0.48
E Marlow -0.25
K Levick -0.17
B Heath -0.12
L Dobson -0.12
K Fraser -0.12

3 B Heath

WK
Similar Perfomance
K Fraser 0.2
G Hall 0.09
S Kalis 0.08
Opposite Perfomance
R Slater -0.2
L Dobson -0.18
L Winfield-Hill -0.12
H Armitage -0.12
K Levick -0.04

4 S Kalis

BAT
Similar Perfomance
E Marlow 0.14
K Fraser 0.12
B Heath 0.08
R Slater 0.07
K Levick 0.04
Opposite Perfomance
L Winfield-Hill -0.5
H Armitage -0.48
L Dobson -0.28
G Hall -0.17

5 L Winfield-Hill

WK
Similar Perfomance
H Armitage 0.44
L Dobson 0.12
E Marlow 0.11
Opposite Perfomance
S Kalis -0.5
E Burns -0.43
K Levick -0.33
B Heath -0.12
R Slater -0.09
K Fraser -0.08

Best SES Player Combinations

Best SES Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad
S Dunkley BAT SES
K Moore AR SES
TC Coleman BOW SES
T Farrant AR SES
B Smith AR SES
A Cranstone BAT SES
P Scholfield BAT SES
P Franklin AR SES
D Gregory BOW SES
C Hill WK SES
R Macdonald-Gay BOW SES
S Dunkley
K Moore
TC Coleman
T Farrant
B Smith
A Cranstone
P Scholfield
P Franklin
D Gregory
C Hill
R Macdonald-Gay
1
1 player
S Dunkley
2 player
S Dunkley
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
S Dunkley
2 player
K Moore
Weak Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
S Dunkley
2 player
TC Coleman
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
S Dunkley
2 player
T Farrant
No Correlation
0.17
1 player
S Dunkley
2 player
B Smith
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
S Dunkley
2 player
A Cranstone
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
S Dunkley
2 player
P Scholfield
No Correlation
0
1 player
S Dunkley
2 player
P Franklin
No Correlation
-0.17
1 player
S Dunkley
2 player
D Gregory
No Correlation
0
1 player
S Dunkley
2 player
C Hill
No Correlation
-0.11
1 player
S Dunkley
2 player
R Macdonald-Gay
No Correlation
-0.25
1 player
K Moore
2 player
S Dunkley
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
K Moore
2 player
K Moore
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
K Moore
2 player
TC Coleman
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
K Moore
2 player
T Farrant
No Correlation
-0.5
1 player
K Moore
2 player
B Smith
Negative Correlation
0.43
1 player
K Moore
2 player
A Cranstone
Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
K Moore
2 player
P Scholfield
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.5
1 player
K Moore
2 player
P Franklin
Negative Correlation
-0.17
1 player
K Moore
2 player
D Gregory
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
K Moore
2 player
C Hill
Positive Correlation
0.45
1 player
K Moore
2 player
R Macdonald-Gay
Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
TC Coleman
2 player
S Dunkley
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
TC Coleman
2 player
K Moore
No Correlation
1
1 player
TC Coleman
2 player
TC Coleman
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
TC Coleman
2 player
T Farrant
No Correlation
0
1 player
TC Coleman
2 player
B Smith
No Correlation
-0.42
1 player
TC Coleman
2 player
A Cranstone
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
TC Coleman
2 player
P Scholfield
No Correlation
-0.5
1 player
TC Coleman
2 player
P Franklin
Negative Correlation
-0.25
1 player
TC Coleman
2 player
D Gregory
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
TC Coleman
2 player
C Hill
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
TC Coleman
2 player
R Macdonald-Gay
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
T Farrant
2 player
S Dunkley
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
T Farrant
2 player
K Moore
No Correlation
0
1 player
T Farrant
2 player
TC Coleman
No Correlation
1
1 player
T Farrant
2 player
T Farrant
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.29
1 player
T Farrant
2 player
B Smith
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.11
1 player
T Farrant
2 player
A Cranstone
No Correlation
-0.45
1 player
T Farrant
2 player
P Scholfield
Negative Correlation
-0.08
1 player
T Farrant
2 player
P Franklin
No Correlation
0.29
1 player
T Farrant
2 player
D Gregory
Weak Positive Correlation
-1
1 player
T Farrant
2 player
C Hill
Strong Negative Correlation
0.56
1 player
T Farrant
2 player
R Macdonald-Gay
Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
B Smith
2 player
S Dunkley
No Correlation
-0.5
1 player
B Smith
2 player
K Moore
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
B Smith
2 player
TC Coleman
No Correlation
-0.29
1 player
B Smith
2 player
T Farrant
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
B Smith
2 player
B Smith
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.16
1 player
B Smith
2 player
A Cranstone
No Correlation
-0.07
1 player
B Smith
2 player
P Scholfield
No Correlation
0.76
1 player
B Smith
2 player
P Franklin
Positive Correlation
-0.15
1 player
B Smith
2 player
D Gregory
No Correlation
-0.2
1 player
B Smith
2 player
C Hill
No Correlation
-0.86
1 player
B Smith
2 player
R Macdonald-Gay
Strong Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
A Cranstone
2 player
S Dunkley
No Correlation
0.43
1 player
A Cranstone
2 player
K Moore
Positive Correlation
-0.42
1 player
A Cranstone
2 player
TC Coleman
Negative Correlation
-0.11
1 player
A Cranstone
2 player
T Farrant
No Correlation
-0.16
1 player
A Cranstone
2 player
B Smith
No Correlation
1
1 player
A Cranstone
2 player
A Cranstone
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.5
1 player
A Cranstone
2 player
P Scholfield
Negative Correlation
-0.18
1 player
A Cranstone
2 player
P Franklin
No Correlation
-0.22
1 player
A Cranstone
2 player
D Gregory
Weak Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
A Cranstone
2 player
C Hill
Weak Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
A Cranstone
2 player
R Macdonald-Gay
Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
P Scholfield
2 player
S Dunkley
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
P Scholfield
2 player
K Moore
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
P Scholfield
2 player
TC Coleman
No Correlation
-0.45
1 player
P Scholfield
2 player
T Farrant
Negative Correlation
-0.07
1 player
P Scholfield
2 player
B Smith
No Correlation
-0.5
1 player
P Scholfield
2 player
A Cranstone
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
P Scholfield
2 player
P Scholfield
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.2
1 player
P Scholfield
2 player
P Franklin
No Correlation
-0.2
1 player
P Scholfield
2 player
D Gregory
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
P Scholfield
2 player
C Hill
No Correlation
0
1 player
P Scholfield
2 player
R Macdonald-Gay
No Correlation
0
1 player
P Franklin
2 player
S Dunkley
No Correlation
-0.5
1 player
P Franklin
2 player
K Moore
Negative Correlation
-0.5
1 player
P Franklin
2 player
TC Coleman
Negative Correlation
-0.08
1 player
P Franklin
2 player
T Farrant
No Correlation
0.76
1 player
P Franklin
2 player
B Smith
Positive Correlation
-0.18
1 player
P Franklin
2 player
A Cranstone
No Correlation
-0.2
1 player
P Franklin
2 player
P Scholfield
No Correlation
1
1 player
P Franklin
2 player
P Franklin
Strong Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
P Franklin
2 player
D Gregory
No Correlation
-0.11
1 player
P Franklin
2 player
C Hill
No Correlation
-0.57
1 player
P Franklin
2 player
R Macdonald-Gay
Negative Correlation
-0.17
1 player
D Gregory
2 player
S Dunkley
No Correlation
-0.17
1 player
D Gregory
2 player
K Moore
No Correlation
-0.25
1 player
D Gregory
2 player
TC Coleman
Weak Negative Correlation
0.29
1 player
D Gregory
2 player
T Farrant
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.15
1 player
D Gregory
2 player
B Smith
No Correlation
-0.22
1 player
D Gregory
2 player
A Cranstone
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.2
1 player
D Gregory
2 player
P Scholfield
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
D Gregory
2 player
P Franklin
No Correlation
1
1 player
D Gregory
2 player
D Gregory
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.4
1 player
D Gregory
2 player
C Hill
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.08
1 player
D Gregory
2 player
R Macdonald-Gay
No Correlation
0
1 player
C Hill
2 player
S Dunkley
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
C Hill
2 player
K Moore
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
C Hill
2 player
TC Coleman
No Correlation
-1
1 player
C Hill
2 player
T Farrant
Strong Negative Correlation
-0.2
1 player
C Hill
2 player
B Smith
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
C Hill
2 player
A Cranstone
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
C Hill
2 player
P Scholfield
No Correlation
-0.11
1 player
C Hill
2 player
P Franklin
No Correlation
-0.4
1 player
C Hill
2 player
D Gregory
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
C Hill
2 player
C Hill
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
C Hill
2 player
R Macdonald-Gay
No Correlation
-0.11
1 player
R Macdonald-Gay
2 player
S Dunkley
No Correlation
0.45
1 player
R Macdonald-Gay
2 player
K Moore
Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
R Macdonald-Gay
2 player
TC Coleman
No Correlation
0.56
1 player
R Macdonald-Gay
2 player
T Farrant
Positive Correlation
-0.86
1 player
R Macdonald-Gay
2 player
B Smith
Strong Negative Correlation
0.4
1 player
R Macdonald-Gay
2 player
A Cranstone
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
R Macdonald-Gay
2 player
P Scholfield
No Correlation
-0.57
1 player
R Macdonald-Gay
2 player
P Franklin
Negative Correlation
-0.08
1 player
R Macdonald-Gay
2 player
D Gregory
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
R Macdonald-Gay
2 player
C Hill
No Correlation
1
1 player
R Macdonald-Gay
2 player
R Macdonald-Gay
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick B Smith and P Franklin together
Positive Correlation

Pick T Farrant and C Hill together
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick B Smith and R Macdonald-Gay together
Strong Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 B Smith

AR
Similar Perfomance
P Franklin 0.76
S Dunkley 0.17
Opposite Perfomance
R Macdonald-Gay -0.86
K Moore -0.5
T Farrant -0.29
C Hill -0.2
A Cranstone -0.16
D Gregory -0.15
P Scholfield -0.07

2 P Franklin

AR
Similar Perfomance
B Smith 0.76
D Gregory 0.08
Opposite Perfomance
R Macdonald-Gay -0.57
K Moore -0.5
TC Coleman -0.5
P Scholfield -0.2
A Cranstone -0.18
C Hill -0.11
T Farrant -0.08

3 D Gregory

BOW
Similar Perfomance
T Farrant 0.29
P Franklin 0.08
Opposite Perfomance
C Hill -0.4
TC Coleman -0.25
A Cranstone -0.22
P Scholfield -0.2
S Dunkley -0.17
K Moore -0.17
B Smith -0.15
R Macdonald-Gay -0.08

4 P Scholfield

BAT
Similar Perfomance
K Moore 0.2
C Hill 0.14
S Dunkley 0.11
Opposite Perfomance
A Cranstone -0.5
T Farrant -0.45
P Franklin -0.2
D Gregory -0.2
B Smith -0.07

5 R Macdonald-Gay

BOW
Similar Perfomance
T Farrant 0.56
K Moore 0.45
A Cranstone 0.4
TC Coleman 0.14
Opposite Perfomance
B Smith -0.86
P Franklin -0.57
C Hill -0.14
S Dunkley -0.11
D Gregory -0.08

PerfectLineup © 2024. All Rights Reserved