PC 28 Jan 09:00 pm JSK

Lineup Out

SuperSport Park, Centurion
South Africa T20 League

Best Player Combinations For
PC vs JSK

How it Works?

This guide is super useful for identifying player combinations that are likely to score big. Use the filters to identify the best player combinations according to specific match scenarios.

Player correlate positively

Both players generally perform similarly when picked together. They either score high together or score low together. Maximise FPts by picking players that correlate positively with top players.

Player correlate negatively

Both players generally perform in an opposite manner. If one player scores high, the other usually scores low. Avoid picking players that correlate negatively with top player

Show Player Combinations on the basis of:

Best PC Player Combinations

Best PC Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad
A Turner BAT PC
KL Cachet WK PC
T Stewart Rogers BOW PC
W Jacks AR PC
W Smeed BAT PC
K Verreynne WK PC
E Bosch BOW PC
S Muthusamy AR PC
M Ackerman BAT PC
M Pretorius BOW PC
G Peters BOW PC
A Turner
KL Cachet
T Stewart Rogers
W Jacks
W Smeed
K Verreynne
E Bosch
S Muthusamy
M Ackerman
M Pretorius
G Peters
1
1 player
A Turner
2 player
A Turner
Strong Positive Correlation
0.55
1 player
A Turner
2 player
KL Cachet
Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
A Turner
2 player
T Stewart Rogers
Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
A Turner
2 player
W Jacks
Weak Positive Correlation
0.55
1 player
A Turner
2 player
W Smeed
Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
A Turner
2 player
K Verreynne
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
A Turner
2 player
E Bosch
Strong Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
A Turner
2 player
S Muthusamy
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Turner
2 player
M Ackerman
No Correlation
-0.35
1 player
A Turner
2 player
M Pretorius
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
A Turner
2 player
G Peters
No Correlation
0.55
1 player
KL Cachet
2 player
A Turner
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
KL Cachet
2 player
KL Cachet
Strong Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
KL Cachet
2 player
T Stewart Rogers
Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
KL Cachet
2 player
W Jacks
Weak Positive Correlation
0.8
1 player
KL Cachet
2 player
W Smeed
Strong Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
KL Cachet
2 player
K Verreynne
Weak Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
KL Cachet
2 player
E Bosch
Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
KL Cachet
2 player
S Muthusamy
Weak Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
KL Cachet
2 player
M Ackerman
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.2
1 player
KL Cachet
2 player
M Pretorius
No Correlation
0.47
1 player
KL Cachet
2 player
G Peters
Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
T Stewart Rogers
2 player
A Turner
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
T Stewart Rogers
2 player
KL Cachet
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
T Stewart Rogers
2 player
T Stewart Rogers
Strong Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
T Stewart Rogers
2 player
W Jacks
Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
T Stewart Rogers
2 player
W Smeed
Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
T Stewart Rogers
2 player
K Verreynne
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
T Stewart Rogers
2 player
E Bosch
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
T Stewart Rogers
2 player
S Muthusamy
Positive Correlation
0.55
1 player
T Stewart Rogers
2 player
M Ackerman
Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
T Stewart Rogers
2 player
M Pretorius
Weak Positive Correlation
0.55
1 player
T Stewart Rogers
2 player
G Peters
Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
W Jacks
2 player
A Turner
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
W Jacks
2 player
KL Cachet
Weak Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
W Jacks
2 player
T Stewart Rogers
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
W Jacks
2 player
W Jacks
Strong Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
W Jacks
2 player
W Smeed
Weak Positive Correlation
0.29
1 player
W Jacks
2 player
K Verreynne
Weak Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
W Jacks
2 player
E Bosch
No Correlation
0.36
1 player
W Jacks
2 player
S Muthusamy
Weak Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
W Jacks
2 player
M Ackerman
Weak Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
W Jacks
2 player
M Pretorius
Weak Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
W Jacks
2 player
G Peters
No Correlation
0.55
1 player
W Smeed
2 player
A Turner
Positive Correlation
0.8
1 player
W Smeed
2 player
KL Cachet
Strong Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
W Smeed
2 player
T Stewart Rogers
Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
W Smeed
2 player
W Jacks
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
W Smeed
2 player
W Smeed
Strong Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
W Smeed
2 player
K Verreynne
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
W Smeed
2 player
E Bosch
No Correlation
0.02
1 player
W Smeed
2 player
S Muthusamy
No Correlation
-0.2
1 player
W Smeed
2 player
M Ackerman
No Correlation
-0.6
1 player
W Smeed
2 player
M Pretorius
Negative Correlation
0.2
1 player
W Smeed
2 player
G Peters
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
K Verreynne
2 player
A Turner
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
K Verreynne
2 player
KL Cachet
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
K Verreynne
2 player
T Stewart Rogers
Weak Positive Correlation
0.29
1 player
K Verreynne
2 player
W Jacks
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
K Verreynne
2 player
W Smeed
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
K Verreynne
2 player
K Verreynne
Strong Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
K Verreynne
2 player
E Bosch
No Correlation
0.22
1 player
K Verreynne
2 player
S Muthusamy
Weak Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
K Verreynne
2 player
M Ackerman
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
K Verreynne
2 player
M Pretorius
Weak Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
K Verreynne
2 player
G Peters
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
E Bosch
2 player
A Turner
Strong Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
E Bosch
2 player
KL Cachet
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
E Bosch
2 player
T Stewart Rogers
No Correlation
0.1
1 player
E Bosch
2 player
W Jacks
No Correlation
0
1 player
E Bosch
2 player
W Smeed
No Correlation
0.18
1 player
E Bosch
2 player
K Verreynne
No Correlation
1
1 player
E Bosch
2 player
E Bosch
Strong Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
E Bosch
2 player
S Muthusamy
No Correlation
0.55
1 player
E Bosch
2 player
M Ackerman
Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
E Bosch
2 player
M Pretorius
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
E Bosch
2 player
G Peters
Negative Correlation
0.15
1 player
S Muthusamy
2 player
A Turner
No Correlation
0.36
1 player
S Muthusamy
2 player
KL Cachet
Weak Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
S Muthusamy
2 player
T Stewart Rogers
Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
S Muthusamy
2 player
W Jacks
Weak Positive Correlation
0.02
1 player
S Muthusamy
2 player
W Smeed
No Correlation
0.22
1 player
S Muthusamy
2 player
K Verreynne
Weak Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
S Muthusamy
2 player
E Bosch
No Correlation
1
1 player
S Muthusamy
2 player
S Muthusamy
Strong Positive Correlation
0.59
1 player
S Muthusamy
2 player
M Ackerman
Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
S Muthusamy
2 player
M Pretorius
Weak Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
S Muthusamy
2 player
G Peters
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
M Ackerman
2 player
A Turner
No Correlation
0.36
1 player
M Ackerman
2 player
KL Cachet
Weak Positive Correlation
0.55
1 player
M Ackerman
2 player
T Stewart Rogers
Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
M Ackerman
2 player
W Jacks
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.2
1 player
M Ackerman
2 player
W Smeed
No Correlation
0.39
1 player
M Ackerman
2 player
K Verreynne
Weak Positive Correlation
0.55
1 player
M Ackerman
2 player
E Bosch
Positive Correlation
0.59
1 player
M Ackerman
2 player
S Muthusamy
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M Ackerman
2 player
M Ackerman
Strong Positive Correlation
0.74
1 player
M Ackerman
2 player
M Pretorius
Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
M Ackerman
2 player
G Peters
Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
M Pretorius
2 player
A Turner
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.2
1 player
M Pretorius
2 player
KL Cachet
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
M Pretorius
2 player
T Stewart Rogers
Weak Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
M Pretorius
2 player
W Jacks
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.6
1 player
M Pretorius
2 player
W Smeed
Negative Correlation
0.25
1 player
M Pretorius
2 player
K Verreynne
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
M Pretorius
2 player
E Bosch
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
M Pretorius
2 player
S Muthusamy
Weak Positive Correlation
0.74
1 player
M Pretorius
2 player
M Ackerman
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M Pretorius
2 player
M Pretorius
Strong Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Pretorius
2 player
G Peters
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
G Peters
2 player
A Turner
No Correlation
0.47
1 player
G Peters
2 player
KL Cachet
Positive Correlation
0.55
1 player
G Peters
2 player
T Stewart Rogers
Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
G Peters
2 player
W Jacks
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
G Peters
2 player
W Smeed
Weak Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
G Peters
2 player
K Verreynne
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
G Peters
2 player
E Bosch
Negative Correlation
0.5
1 player
G Peters
2 player
S Muthusamy
Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
G Peters
2 player
M Ackerman
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
G Peters
2 player
M Pretorius
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
G Peters
2 player
G Peters
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick A Turner and E Bosch together
Strong Positive Correlation

Pick KL Cachet and T Stewart Rogers together
Positive Correlation

Pick KL Cachet and W Smeed together
Strong Positive Correlation

Pick T Stewart Rogers and W Jacks together
Positive Correlation

Pick T Stewart Rogers and S Muthusamy together
Positive Correlation

Pick M Ackerman and M Pretorius together
Positive Correlation

Pick M Pretorius and G Peters together
Positive Correlation

Don’t Pick W Smeed and M Pretorius together
Negative Correlation

Don’t Pick E Bosch and G Peters together
Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 W Jacks

AR
Similar Perfomance
T Stewart Rogers 0.7
M Pretorius 0.39
S Muthusamy 0.36
W Smeed 0.35
M Ackerman 0.31
K Verreynne 0.29
KL Cachet 0.28
A Turner 0.2
G Peters 0.13
E Bosch 0.1

2 E Bosch

BOW
Similar Perfomance
A Turner 1
M Ackerman 0.55
KL Cachet 0.4
M Pretorius 0.28
K Verreynne 0.18
S Muthusamy 0.17
W Jacks 0.1
Opposite Perfomance
G Peters -0.7

3 S Muthusamy

AR
Similar Perfomance
T Stewart Rogers 0.7
M Ackerman 0.59
G Peters 0.5
KL Cachet 0.36
W Jacks 0.36
M Pretorius 0.33
K Verreynne 0.22
E Bosch 0.17
A Turner 0.15
W Smeed 0.02

4 K Verreynne

WK
Similar Perfomance
M Ackerman 0.39
T Stewart Rogers 0.35
W Jacks 0.29
KL Cachet 0.28
W Smeed 0.28
G Peters 0.27
M Pretorius 0.25
S Muthusamy 0.22
A Turner 0.2
E Bosch 0.18

5 M Pretorius

BOW
Similar Perfomance
M Ackerman 0.74
G Peters 0.7
W Jacks 0.39
S Muthusamy 0.33
E Bosch 0.28
K Verreynne 0.25
T Stewart Rogers 0.2
Opposite Perfomance
W Smeed -0.6
A Turner -0.35
KL Cachet -0.2

Best JSK Player Combinations

Best JSK Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad
H Viljoen BOW JSK
M Pathirana BOW JSK
D Ferreira AR JSK
D Conway WK JSK
I Tahir BOW JSK
W Lubbe BAT JSK
E Jones AR JSK
F du Plessis BAT JSK
L Sipamla BOW JSK
J Bairstow WK JSK
M Ali AR JSK
H Viljoen
M Pathirana
D Ferreira
D Conway
I Tahir
W Lubbe
E Jones
F du Plessis
L Sipamla
J Bairstow
M Ali
1
1 player
H Viljoen
2 player
H Viljoen
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.27
1 player
H Viljoen
2 player
M Pathirana
Weak Negative Correlation
0.29
1 player
H Viljoen
2 player
D Ferreira
Weak Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
H Viljoen
2 player
D Conway
Weak Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
H Viljoen
2 player
I Tahir
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.02
1 player
H Viljoen
2 player
W Lubbe
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
H Viljoen
2 player
E Jones
Weak Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
H Viljoen
2 player
F du Plessis
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
H Viljoen
2 player
L Sipamla
Weak Positive Correlation
0.54
1 player
H Viljoen
2 player
J Bairstow
Positive Correlation
-0.09
1 player
H Viljoen
2 player
M Ali
No Correlation
-0.27
1 player
M Pathirana
2 player
H Viljoen
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
M Pathirana
2 player
M Pathirana
Strong Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
M Pathirana
2 player
D Ferreira
Weak Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
M Pathirana
2 player
D Conway
Positive Correlation
0.62
1 player
M Pathirana
2 player
I Tahir
Positive Correlation
0.63
1 player
M Pathirana
2 player
W Lubbe
Positive Correlation
0.44
1 player
M Pathirana
2 player
E Jones
Positive Correlation
0.02
1 player
M Pathirana
2 player
F du Plessis
No Correlation
-0.4
1 player
M Pathirana
2 player
L Sipamla
Weak Negative Correlation
0.2
1 player
M Pathirana
2 player
J Bairstow
Weak Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Pathirana
2 player
M Ali
Positive Correlation
0.29
1 player
D Ferreira
2 player
H Viljoen
Weak Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
D Ferreira
2 player
M Pathirana
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
D Ferreira
2 player
D Ferreira
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
D Ferreira
2 player
D Conway
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
D Ferreira
2 player
I Tahir
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.17
1 player
D Ferreira
2 player
W Lubbe
No Correlation
0.12
1 player
D Ferreira
2 player
E Jones
No Correlation
-0.02
1 player
D Ferreira
2 player
F du Plessis
No Correlation
-0.04
1 player
D Ferreira
2 player
L Sipamla
No Correlation
0.32
1 player
D Ferreira
2 player
J Bairstow
Weak Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
D Ferreira
2 player
M Ali
No Correlation
0.31
1 player
D Conway
2 player
H Viljoen
Weak Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
D Conway
2 player
M Pathirana
Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
D Conway
2 player
D Ferreira
No Correlation
1
1 player
D Conway
2 player
D Conway
Strong Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
D Conway
2 player
I Tahir
Weak Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
D Conway
2 player
W Lubbe
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
D Conway
2 player
E Jones
Weak Positive Correlation
0.57
1 player
D Conway
2 player
F du Plessis
Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
D Conway
2 player
L Sipamla
Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
D Conway
2 player
J Bairstow
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
D Conway
2 player
M Ali
Weak Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
I Tahir
2 player
H Viljoen
Weak Positive Correlation
0.62
1 player
I Tahir
2 player
M Pathirana
Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
I Tahir
2 player
D Ferreira
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
I Tahir
2 player
D Conway
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
I Tahir
2 player
I Tahir
Strong Positive Correlation
0.44
1 player
I Tahir
2 player
W Lubbe
Positive Correlation
0.41
1 player
I Tahir
2 player
E Jones
Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
I Tahir
2 player
F du Plessis
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.19
1 player
I Tahir
2 player
L Sipamla
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
I Tahir
2 player
J Bairstow
Weak Positive Correlation
0.52
1 player
I Tahir
2 player
M Ali
Positive Correlation
-0.02
1 player
W Lubbe
2 player
H Viljoen
No Correlation
0.63
1 player
W Lubbe
2 player
M Pathirana
Positive Correlation
-0.17
1 player
W Lubbe
2 player
D Ferreira
No Correlation
0.36
1 player
W Lubbe
2 player
D Conway
Weak Positive Correlation
0.44
1 player
W Lubbe
2 player
I Tahir
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
W Lubbe
2 player
W Lubbe
Strong Positive Correlation
0.54
1 player
W Lubbe
2 player
E Jones
Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
W Lubbe
2 player
F du Plessis
No Correlation
0.01
1 player
W Lubbe
2 player
L Sipamla
No Correlation
0.04
1 player
W Lubbe
2 player
J Bairstow
No Correlation
0.53
1 player
W Lubbe
2 player
M Ali
Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
E Jones
2 player
H Viljoen
Weak Positive Correlation
0.44
1 player
E Jones
2 player
M Pathirana
Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
E Jones
2 player
D Ferreira
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
E Jones
2 player
D Conway
Weak Positive Correlation
0.41
1 player
E Jones
2 player
I Tahir
Positive Correlation
0.54
1 player
E Jones
2 player
W Lubbe
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
E Jones
2 player
E Jones
Strong Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
E Jones
2 player
F du Plessis
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.06
1 player
E Jones
2 player
L Sipamla
No Correlation
0.26
1 player
E Jones
2 player
J Bairstow
Weak Positive Correlation
0.62
1 player
E Jones
2 player
M Ali
Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
F du Plessis
2 player
H Viljoen
No Correlation
0.02
1 player
F du Plessis
2 player
M Pathirana
No Correlation
-0.02
1 player
F du Plessis
2 player
D Ferreira
No Correlation
0.57
1 player
F du Plessis
2 player
D Conway
Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
F du Plessis
2 player
I Tahir
Weak Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
F du Plessis
2 player
W Lubbe
No Correlation
0.3
1 player
F du Plessis
2 player
E Jones
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
F du Plessis
2 player
F du Plessis
Strong Positive Correlation
0.51
1 player
F du Plessis
2 player
L Sipamla
Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
F du Plessis
2 player
J Bairstow
No Correlation
0.21
1 player
F du Plessis
2 player
M Ali
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
L Sipamla
2 player
H Viljoen
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.4
1 player
L Sipamla
2 player
M Pathirana
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.04
1 player
L Sipamla
2 player
D Ferreira
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
L Sipamla
2 player
D Conway
Positive Correlation
-0.19
1 player
L Sipamla
2 player
I Tahir
No Correlation
0.01
1 player
L Sipamla
2 player
W Lubbe
No Correlation
-0.06
1 player
L Sipamla
2 player
E Jones
No Correlation
0.51
1 player
L Sipamla
2 player
F du Plessis
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
L Sipamla
2 player
L Sipamla
Strong Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
L Sipamla
2 player
J Bairstow
No Correlation
-0.22
1 player
L Sipamla
2 player
M Ali
Weak Negative Correlation
0.54
1 player
J Bairstow
2 player
H Viljoen
Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
J Bairstow
2 player
M Pathirana
Weak Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
J Bairstow
2 player
D Ferreira
Weak Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
J Bairstow
2 player
D Conway
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
J Bairstow
2 player
I Tahir
Weak Positive Correlation
0.04
1 player
J Bairstow
2 player
W Lubbe
No Correlation
0.26
1 player
J Bairstow
2 player
E Jones
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
J Bairstow
2 player
F du Plessis
No Correlation
0.12
1 player
J Bairstow
2 player
L Sipamla
No Correlation
1
1 player
J Bairstow
2 player
J Bairstow
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.2
1 player
J Bairstow
2 player
M Ali
No Correlation
-0.09
1 player
M Ali
2 player
H Viljoen
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Ali
2 player
M Pathirana
Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
M Ali
2 player
D Ferreira
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
M Ali
2 player
D Conway
Weak Positive Correlation
0.52
1 player
M Ali
2 player
I Tahir
Positive Correlation
0.53
1 player
M Ali
2 player
W Lubbe
Positive Correlation
0.62
1 player
M Ali
2 player
E Jones
Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
M Ali
2 player
F du Plessis
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.22
1 player
M Ali
2 player
L Sipamla
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.2
1 player
M Ali
2 player
J Bairstow
No Correlation
1
1 player
M Ali
2 player
M Ali
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick M Pathirana and I Tahir together
Positive Correlation

Pick M Pathirana and W Lubbe together
Positive Correlation

Pick M Pathirana and M Ali together
Positive Correlation

Pick E Jones and M Ali together
Positive Correlation

High Performing Players

1 F du Plessis

BAT
Similar Perfomance
D Conway 0.57
L Sipamla 0.51
E Jones 0.3
I Tahir 0.28
M Ali 0.21
J Bairstow 0.14
W Lubbe 0.13
H Viljoen 0.12
M Pathirana 0.02
Opposite Perfomance
D Ferreira -0.02

2 D Ferreira

AR
Similar Perfomance
I Tahir 0.33
J Bairstow 0.32
H Viljoen 0.29
M Pathirana 0.22
M Ali 0.18
E Jones 0.12
Opposite Perfomance
W Lubbe -0.17
D Conway -0.14
L Sipamla -0.04
F du Plessis -0.02

3 I Tahir

BOW
Similar Perfomance
M Pathirana 0.62
M Ali 0.52
W Lubbe 0.44
E Jones 0.41
D Ferreira 0.33
H Viljoen 0.31
D Conway 0.28
F du Plessis 0.28
J Bairstow 0.28
Opposite Perfomance
L Sipamla -0.19

4 M Ali

AR
Similar Perfomance
M Pathirana 0.7
E Jones 0.62
W Lubbe 0.53
I Tahir 0.52
D Conway 0.23
F du Plessis 0.21
D Ferreira 0.18
Opposite Perfomance
L Sipamla -0.22
J Bairstow -0.2
H Viljoen -0.09

5 H Viljoen

BOW
Similar Perfomance
J Bairstow 0.54
D Conway 0.31
I Tahir 0.31
D Ferreira 0.29
L Sipamla 0.25
E Jones 0.23
F du Plessis 0.12
Opposite Perfomance
M Pathirana -0.27
M Ali -0.09
W Lubbe -0.02

Best PC Player Combinations

Best PC Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad
A Turner BAT PC
KL Cachet WK PC
T Stewart Rogers BOW PC
W Jacks AR PC
W Smeed BAT PC
K Verreynne WK PC
E Bosch BOW PC
S Muthusamy AR PC
M Ackerman BAT PC
M Pretorius BOW PC
G Peters BOW PC
A Turner
KL Cachet
T Stewart Rogers
W Jacks
W Smeed
K Verreynne
E Bosch
S Muthusamy
M Ackerman
M Pretorius
G Peters
1
1 player
A Turner
2 player
A Turner
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
A Turner
2 player
KL Cachet
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
A Turner
2 player
T Stewart Rogers
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
A Turner
2 player
W Jacks
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
A Turner
2 player
W Smeed
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Turner
2 player
K Verreynne
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
A Turner
2 player
E Bosch
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
A Turner
2 player
S Muthusamy
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
A Turner
2 player
M Ackerman
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
A Turner
2 player
M Pretorius
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
A Turner
2 player
G Peters
No Correlation
0
1 player
KL Cachet
2 player
A Turner
No Correlation
1
1 player
KL Cachet
2 player
KL Cachet
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
KL Cachet
2 player
T Stewart Rogers
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
KL Cachet
2 player
W Jacks
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
KL Cachet
2 player
W Smeed
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.42
1 player
KL Cachet
2 player
K Verreynne
Negative Correlation
0.23
1 player
KL Cachet
2 player
E Bosch
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
KL Cachet
2 player
S Muthusamy
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
KL Cachet
2 player
M Ackerman
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
KL Cachet
2 player
M Pretorius
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
KL Cachet
2 player
G Peters
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
T Stewart Rogers
2 player
A Turner
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
T Stewart Rogers
2 player
KL Cachet
No Correlation
1
1 player
T Stewart Rogers
2 player
T Stewart Rogers
Strong Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
T Stewart Rogers
2 player
W Jacks
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
T Stewart Rogers
2 player
W Smeed
No Correlation
0
1 player
T Stewart Rogers
2 player
K Verreynne
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
T Stewart Rogers
2 player
E Bosch
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
T Stewart Rogers
2 player
S Muthusamy
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
T Stewart Rogers
2 player
M Ackerman
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
T Stewart Rogers
2 player
M Pretorius
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
T Stewart Rogers
2 player
G Peters
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
W Jacks
2 player
A Turner
Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
W Jacks
2 player
KL Cachet
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
W Jacks
2 player
T Stewart Rogers
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
W Jacks
2 player
W Jacks
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
W Jacks
2 player
W Smeed
No Correlation
0
1 player
W Jacks
2 player
K Verreynne
No Correlation
-0.57
1 player
W Jacks
2 player
E Bosch
Negative Correlation
0.25
1 player
W Jacks
2 player
S Muthusamy
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.4
1 player
W Jacks
2 player
M Ackerman
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
W Jacks
2 player
M Pretorius
No Correlation
-0.23
1 player
W Jacks
2 player
G Peters
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
W Smeed
2 player
A Turner
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
W Smeed
2 player
KL Cachet
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
W Smeed
2 player
T Stewart Rogers
No Correlation
0
1 player
W Smeed
2 player
W Jacks
No Correlation
1
1 player
W Smeed
2 player
W Smeed
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
W Smeed
2 player
K Verreynne
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
W Smeed
2 player
E Bosch
No Correlation
-0.23
1 player
W Smeed
2 player
S Muthusamy
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
W Smeed
2 player
M Ackerman
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
W Smeed
2 player
M Pretorius
Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
W Smeed
2 player
G Peters
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
K Verreynne
2 player
A Turner
No Correlation
-0.42
1 player
K Verreynne
2 player
KL Cachet
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
K Verreynne
2 player
T Stewart Rogers
No Correlation
0
1 player
K Verreynne
2 player
W Jacks
No Correlation
-0.35
1 player
K Verreynne
2 player
W Smeed
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
K Verreynne
2 player
K Verreynne
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
K Verreynne
2 player
E Bosch
No Correlation
0.17
1 player
K Verreynne
2 player
S Muthusamy
No Correlation
-0.11
1 player
K Verreynne
2 player
M Ackerman
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
K Verreynne
2 player
M Pretorius
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
K Verreynne
2 player
G Peters
Weak Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
E Bosch
2 player
A Turner
Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
E Bosch
2 player
KL Cachet
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
E Bosch
2 player
T Stewart Rogers
Negative Correlation
-0.57
1 player
E Bosch
2 player
W Jacks
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
E Bosch
2 player
W Smeed
No Correlation
0
1 player
E Bosch
2 player
K Verreynne
No Correlation
1
1 player
E Bosch
2 player
E Bosch
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.22
1 player
E Bosch
2 player
S Muthusamy
Weak Negative Correlation
0.5
1 player
E Bosch
2 player
M Ackerman
Positive Correlation
-0.27
1 player
E Bosch
2 player
M Pretorius
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
E Bosch
2 player
G Peters
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
S Muthusamy
2 player
A Turner
Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
S Muthusamy
2 player
KL Cachet
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
S Muthusamy
2 player
T Stewart Rogers
Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
S Muthusamy
2 player
W Jacks
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
S Muthusamy
2 player
W Smeed
Weak Negative Correlation
0.17
1 player
S Muthusamy
2 player
K Verreynne
No Correlation
-0.22
1 player
S Muthusamy
2 player
E Bosch
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
S Muthusamy
2 player
S Muthusamy
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
S Muthusamy
2 player
M Ackerman
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
S Muthusamy
2 player
M Pretorius
No Correlation
-0.23
1 player
S Muthusamy
2 player
G Peters
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
M Ackerman
2 player
A Turner
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
M Ackerman
2 player
KL Cachet
No Correlation
0
1 player
M Ackerman
2 player
T Stewart Rogers
No Correlation
-0.4
1 player
M Ackerman
2 player
W Jacks
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
M Ackerman
2 player
W Smeed
Negative Correlation
-0.11
1 player
M Ackerman
2 player
K Verreynne
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
M Ackerman
2 player
E Bosch
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
M Ackerman
2 player
S Muthusamy
No Correlation
1
1 player
M Ackerman
2 player
M Ackerman
Strong Positive Correlation
0.67
1 player
M Ackerman
2 player
M Pretorius
Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
M Ackerman
2 player
G Peters
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
M Pretorius
2 player
A Turner
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
M Pretorius
2 player
KL Cachet
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Pretorius
2 player
T Stewart Rogers
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
M Pretorius
2 player
W Jacks
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
M Pretorius
2 player
W Smeed
Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
M Pretorius
2 player
K Verreynne
No Correlation
-0.27
1 player
M Pretorius
2 player
E Bosch
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
M Pretorius
2 player
S Muthusamy
No Correlation
0.67
1 player
M Pretorius
2 player
M Ackerman
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M Pretorius
2 player
M Pretorius
Strong Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Pretorius
2 player
G Peters
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
G Peters
2 player
A Turner
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
G Peters
2 player
KL Cachet
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
G Peters
2 player
T Stewart Rogers
No Correlation
-0.23
1 player
G Peters
2 player
W Jacks
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
G Peters
2 player
W Smeed
Weak Negative Correlation
0.23
1 player
G Peters
2 player
K Verreynne
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
G Peters
2 player
E Bosch
Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
G Peters
2 player
S Muthusamy
Weak Negative Correlation
0.23
1 player
G Peters
2 player
M Ackerman
Weak Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
G Peters
2 player
M Pretorius
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
G Peters
2 player
G Peters
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick T Stewart Rogers and M Pretorius together
Positive Correlation

Pick A Turner and T Stewart Rogers together
Negative Correlation

Pick A Turner and W Jacks together
Negative Correlation

Pick A Turner and S Muthusamy together
Negative Correlation

Pick A Turner and M Pretorius together
Negative Correlation

Pick KL Cachet and M Pretorius together
Negative Correlation

Pick KL Cachet and G Peters together
Negative Correlation

Pick T Stewart Rogers and E Bosch together
Negative Correlation

Pick W Smeed and M Ackerman together
Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 W Jacks

AR
Similar Perfomance
T Stewart Rogers 0.7
S Muthusamy 0.25
KL Cachet 0.14
Opposite Perfomance
A Turner -0.7
E Bosch -0.57
M Ackerman -0.4
G Peters -0.23

2 E Bosch

BOW
Similar Perfomance
A Turner 0.7
M Ackerman 0.5
KL Cachet 0.23
Opposite Perfomance
T Stewart Rogers -0.7
G Peters -0.7
W Jacks -0.57
M Pretorius -0.27
S Muthusamy -0.22

3 K Verreynne

WK
Similar Perfomance
G Peters 0.23
S Muthusamy 0.17
Opposite Perfomance
KL Cachet -0.42
W Smeed -0.35
M Pretorius -0.14
M Ackerman -0.11

4 S Muthusamy

AR
Similar Perfomance
T Stewart Rogers 0.7
W Jacks 0.25
K Verreynne 0.17
Opposite Perfomance
A Turner -0.7
W Smeed -0.23
G Peters -0.23
E Bosch -0.22
KL Cachet -0.14
M Pretorius -0.14

5 M Pretorius

BOW
Similar Perfomance
T Stewart Rogers 0.7
G Peters 0.7
M Ackerman 0.67
Opposite Perfomance
A Turner -0.7
KL Cachet -0.7
W Smeed -0.7
E Bosch -0.27
K Verreynne -0.14
S Muthusamy -0.14

Best JSK Player Combinations

Best JSK Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad
H Viljoen BOW JSK
M Pathirana BOW JSK
D Ferreira AR JSK
D Conway WK JSK
I Tahir BOW JSK
W Lubbe BAT JSK
E Jones AR JSK
F du Plessis BAT JSK
L Sipamla BOW JSK
J Bairstow WK JSK
M Ali AR JSK
H Viljoen
M Pathirana
D Ferreira
D Conway
I Tahir
W Lubbe
E Jones
F du Plessis
L Sipamla
J Bairstow
M Ali
1
1 player
H Viljoen
2 player
H Viljoen
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
H Viljoen
2 player
M Pathirana
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
H Viljoen
2 player
D Ferreira
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
H Viljoen
2 player
D Conway
Weak Negative Correlation
0.25
1 player
H Viljoen
2 player
I Tahir
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.67
1 player
H Viljoen
2 player
W Lubbe
Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
H Viljoen
2 player
E Jones
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.11
1 player
H Viljoen
2 player
F du Plessis
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
H Viljoen
2 player
L Sipamla
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
H Viljoen
2 player
J Bairstow
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
H Viljoen
2 player
M Ali
No Correlation
0
1 player
M Pathirana
2 player
H Viljoen
No Correlation
1
1 player
M Pathirana
2 player
M Pathirana
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.42
1 player
M Pathirana
2 player
D Ferreira
Negative Correlation
0.42
1 player
M Pathirana
2 player
D Conway
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Pathirana
2 player
I Tahir
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Pathirana
2 player
W Lubbe
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
M Pathirana
2 player
E Jones
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
M Pathirana
2 player
F du Plessis
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
M Pathirana
2 player
L Sipamla
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
M Pathirana
2 player
J Bairstow
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
M Pathirana
2 player
M Ali
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
D Ferreira
2 player
H Viljoen
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.42
1 player
D Ferreira
2 player
M Pathirana
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
D Ferreira
2 player
D Ferreira
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.6
1 player
D Ferreira
2 player
D Conway
Negative Correlation
-0.06
1 player
D Ferreira
2 player
I Tahir
No Correlation
-0.5
1 player
D Ferreira
2 player
W Lubbe
Negative Correlation
-0.5
1 player
D Ferreira
2 player
E Jones
Negative Correlation
-0.38
1 player
D Ferreira
2 player
F du Plessis
Weak Negative Correlation
0.25
1 player
D Ferreira
2 player
L Sipamla
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
D Ferreira
2 player
J Bairstow
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.07
1 player
D Ferreira
2 player
M Ali
No Correlation
-0.25
1 player
D Conway
2 player
H Viljoen
Weak Negative Correlation
0.42
1 player
D Conway
2 player
M Pathirana
Positive Correlation
-0.6
1 player
D Conway
2 player
D Ferreira
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
D Conway
2 player
D Conway
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.11
1 player
D Conway
2 player
I Tahir
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
D Conway
2 player
W Lubbe
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
D Conway
2 player
E Jones
Weak Negative Correlation
0.45
1 player
D Conway
2 player
F du Plessis
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
D Conway
2 player
L Sipamla
No Correlation
-0.2
1 player
D Conway
2 player
J Bairstow
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
D Conway
2 player
M Ali
Weak Negative Correlation
0.25
1 player
I Tahir
2 player
H Viljoen
Weak Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
I Tahir
2 player
M Pathirana
Positive Correlation
-0.06
1 player
I Tahir
2 player
D Ferreira
No Correlation
-0.11
1 player
I Tahir
2 player
D Conway
No Correlation
1
1 player
I Tahir
2 player
I Tahir
Strong Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
I Tahir
2 player
W Lubbe
Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
I Tahir
2 player
E Jones
No Correlation
-0.11
1 player
I Tahir
2 player
F du Plessis
No Correlation
0
1 player
I Tahir
2 player
L Sipamla
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
I Tahir
2 player
J Bairstow
Weak Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
I Tahir
2 player
M Ali
No Correlation
-0.67
1 player
W Lubbe
2 player
H Viljoen
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
W Lubbe
2 player
M Pathirana
Positive Correlation
-0.5
1 player
W Lubbe
2 player
D Ferreira
Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
W Lubbe
2 player
D Conway
Weak Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
W Lubbe
2 player
I Tahir
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
W Lubbe
2 player
W Lubbe
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
W Lubbe
2 player
E Jones
No Correlation
-0.23
1 player
W Lubbe
2 player
F du Plessis
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
W Lubbe
2 player
L Sipamla
No Correlation
-0.5
1 player
W Lubbe
2 player
J Bairstow
Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
W Lubbe
2 player
M Ali
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
E Jones
2 player
H Viljoen
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
E Jones
2 player
M Pathirana
No Correlation
-0.5
1 player
E Jones
2 player
D Ferreira
Negative Correlation
-0.25
1 player
E Jones
2 player
D Conway
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
E Jones
2 player
I Tahir
No Correlation
0
1 player
E Jones
2 player
W Lubbe
No Correlation
1
1 player
E Jones
2 player
E Jones
Strong Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
E Jones
2 player
F du Plessis
No Correlation
-1
1 player
E Jones
2 player
L Sipamla
Strong Negative Correlation
-0.25
1 player
E Jones
2 player
J Bairstow
Weak Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
E Jones
2 player
M Ali
Positive Correlation
-0.11
1 player
F du Plessis
2 player
H Viljoen
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
F du Plessis
2 player
M Pathirana
No Correlation
-0.38
1 player
F du Plessis
2 player
D Ferreira
Weak Negative Correlation
0.45
1 player
F du Plessis
2 player
D Conway
Positive Correlation
-0.11
1 player
F du Plessis
2 player
I Tahir
No Correlation
-0.23
1 player
F du Plessis
2 player
W Lubbe
Weak Negative Correlation
0.11
1 player
F du Plessis
2 player
E Jones
No Correlation
1
1 player
F du Plessis
2 player
F du Plessis
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
F du Plessis
2 player
L Sipamla
No Correlation
-0.4
1 player
F du Plessis
2 player
J Bairstow
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
F du Plessis
2 player
M Ali
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
L Sipamla
2 player
H Viljoen
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
L Sipamla
2 player
M Pathirana
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
L Sipamla
2 player
D Ferreira
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
L Sipamla
2 player
D Conway
No Correlation
0
1 player
L Sipamla
2 player
I Tahir
No Correlation
0
1 player
L Sipamla
2 player
W Lubbe
No Correlation
-1
1 player
L Sipamla
2 player
E Jones
Strong Negative Correlation
0
1 player
L Sipamla
2 player
F du Plessis
No Correlation
1
1 player
L Sipamla
2 player
L Sipamla
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
L Sipamla
2 player
J Bairstow
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
L Sipamla
2 player
M Ali
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
J Bairstow
2 player
H Viljoen
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
J Bairstow
2 player
M Pathirana
Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
J Bairstow
2 player
D Ferreira
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.2
1 player
J Bairstow
2 player
D Conway
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
J Bairstow
2 player
I Tahir
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.5
1 player
J Bairstow
2 player
W Lubbe
Negative Correlation
-0.25
1 player
J Bairstow
2 player
E Jones
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.4
1 player
J Bairstow
2 player
F du Plessis
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
J Bairstow
2 player
L Sipamla
No Correlation
1
1 player
J Bairstow
2 player
J Bairstow
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.42
1 player
J Bairstow
2 player
M Ali
Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
M Ali
2 player
H Viljoen
No Correlation
0
1 player
M Ali
2 player
M Pathirana
No Correlation
-0.07
1 player
M Ali
2 player
D Ferreira
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
M Ali
2 player
D Conway
Weak Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
M Ali
2 player
I Tahir
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
M Ali
2 player
W Lubbe
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Ali
2 player
E Jones
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
M Ali
2 player
F du Plessis
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
M Ali
2 player
L Sipamla
No Correlation
-0.42
1 player
M Ali
2 player
J Bairstow
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
M Ali
2 player
M Ali
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

No data found

Pick H Viljoen and W Lubbe together
Negative Correlation

Pick M Pathirana and J Bairstow together
Negative Correlation

Pick D Ferreira and D Conway together
Negative Correlation

Pick E Jones and L Sipamla together
Strong Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 D Ferreira

AR
Similar Perfomance
J Bairstow 0.33
H Viljoen 0.25
L Sipamla 0.25
Opposite Perfomance
D Conway -0.6
W Lubbe -0.5
E Jones -0.5
M Pathirana -0.42
F du Plessis -0.38
M Ali -0.07
I Tahir -0.06

2 F du Plessis

BAT
Similar Perfomance
D Conway 0.45
M Pathirana 0.14
E Jones 0.11
Opposite Perfomance
J Bairstow -0.4
D Ferreira -0.38
W Lubbe -0.23
H Viljoen -0.11
I Tahir -0.11

3 I Tahir

BOW
Similar Perfomance
M Pathirana 0.7
W Lubbe 0.4
H Viljoen 0.25
M Ali 0.14
Opposite Perfomance
J Bairstow -0.33
E Jones -0.14
D Conway -0.11
F du Plessis -0.11
D Ferreira -0.06

4 H Viljoen

BOW
Similar Perfomance
D Ferreira 0.25
I Tahir 0.25
L Sipamla 0.14
Opposite Perfomance
W Lubbe -0.67
E Jones -0.33
D Conway -0.25
J Bairstow -0.14
M Ali -0.14
F du Plessis -0.11

5 M Ali

AR
Similar Perfomance
E Jones 0.7
I Tahir 0.14
W Lubbe 0.14
Opposite Perfomance
J Bairstow -0.42
D Conway -0.33
H Viljoen -0.14
L Sipamla -0.14
D Ferreira -0.07

PerfectLineup © 2025. All Rights Reserved