Upcoming
Fixtures
View All
PC 14 Jan 04:30 pm SEC

Lineup Out

SuperSport Park, Centurion
South Africa T20 League

Best Player Combinations For
PC vs SEC

How it Works?

This guide is super useful for identifying player combinations that are likely to score big. Use the filters to identify the best player combinations according to specific match scenarios.

Player correlate positively

Both players generally perform similarly when picked together. They either score high together or score low together. Maximise FPts by picking players that correlate positively with top players.

Player correlate negatively

Both players generally perform in an opposite manner. If one player scores high, the other usually scores low. Avoid picking players that correlate negatively with top player

More on PL Labs

PC vs SEC

Show Player Combinations on the basis of:

Best PC Player Combinations

Best PC Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
J Neesham AR PC
R Gurbaz WK PC
L Livingstone AR PC
W Jacks BAT PC
R Rossouw BAT PC
K Verreynne WK PC
E Bosch BOW PC
S Muthusamy AR PC
D Dupavillon BOW PC
M Ackerman BAT PC
M Pretorius BOW PC
J Neesham
R Gurbaz
L Livingstone
W Jacks
R Rossouw
K Verreynne
E Bosch
S Muthusamy
D Dupavillon
M Ackerman
M Pretorius
1
1 player
J Neesham
2 player
J Neesham
Strong Positive Correlation
0.04
1 player
J Neesham
2 player
R Gurbaz
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
J Neesham
2 player
L Livingstone
Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
J Neesham
2 player
W Jacks
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
J Neesham
2 player
R Rossouw
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
J Neesham
2 player
K Verreynne
Weak Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
J Neesham
2 player
E Bosch
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
J Neesham
2 player
S Muthusamy
No Correlation
0.49
1 player
J Neesham
2 player
D Dupavillon
Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
J Neesham
2 player
M Ackerman
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
J Neesham
2 player
M Pretorius
Weak Positive Correlation
0.04
1 player
R Gurbaz
2 player
J Neesham
No Correlation
1
1 player
R Gurbaz
2 player
R Gurbaz
Strong Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
R Gurbaz
2 player
L Livingstone
Weak Positive Correlation
0.29
1 player
R Gurbaz
2 player
W Jacks
Weak Positive Correlation
0.59
1 player
R Gurbaz
2 player
R Rossouw
Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
R Gurbaz
2 player
K Verreynne
Weak Positive Correlation
0.01
1 player
R Gurbaz
2 player
E Bosch
No Correlation
0.27
1 player
R Gurbaz
2 player
S Muthusamy
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.13
1 player
R Gurbaz
2 player
D Dupavillon
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
R Gurbaz
2 player
M Ackerman
Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
R Gurbaz
2 player
M Pretorius
Weak Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
L Livingstone
2 player
J Neesham
Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
L Livingstone
2 player
R Gurbaz
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
L Livingstone
2 player
L Livingstone
Strong Positive Correlation
0.58
1 player
L Livingstone
2 player
W Jacks
Positive Correlation
0.6
1 player
L Livingstone
2 player
R Rossouw
Positive Correlation
0.52
1 player
L Livingstone
2 player
K Verreynne
Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
L Livingstone
2 player
E Bosch
Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
L Livingstone
2 player
S Muthusamy
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
L Livingstone
2 player
D Dupavillon
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
L Livingstone
2 player
M Ackerman
Weak Positive Correlation
0.57
1 player
L Livingstone
2 player
M Pretorius
Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
W Jacks
2 player
J Neesham
No Correlation
0.29
1 player
W Jacks
2 player
R Gurbaz
Weak Positive Correlation
0.58
1 player
W Jacks
2 player
L Livingstone
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
W Jacks
2 player
W Jacks
Strong Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
W Jacks
2 player
R Rossouw
No Correlation
0.3
1 player
W Jacks
2 player
K Verreynne
Weak Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
W Jacks
2 player
E Bosch
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
W Jacks
2 player
S Muthusamy
Weak Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
W Jacks
2 player
D Dupavillon
No Correlation
0.26
1 player
W Jacks
2 player
M Ackerman
Weak Positive Correlation
0.54
1 player
W Jacks
2 player
M Pretorius
Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
R Rossouw
2 player
J Neesham
Weak Positive Correlation
0.59
1 player
R Rossouw
2 player
R Gurbaz
Positive Correlation
0.6
1 player
R Rossouw
2 player
L Livingstone
Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
R Rossouw
2 player
W Jacks
No Correlation
1
1 player
R Rossouw
2 player
R Rossouw
Strong Positive Correlation
0.29
1 player
R Rossouw
2 player
K Verreynne
Weak Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
R Rossouw
2 player
E Bosch
Weak Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
R Rossouw
2 player
S Muthusamy
No Correlation
0.22
1 player
R Rossouw
2 player
D Dupavillon
Weak Positive Correlation
0.59
1 player
R Rossouw
2 player
M Ackerman
Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
R Rossouw
2 player
M Pretorius
Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
K Verreynne
2 player
J Neesham
Weak Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
K Verreynne
2 player
R Gurbaz
Weak Positive Correlation
0.52
1 player
K Verreynne
2 player
L Livingstone
Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
K Verreynne
2 player
W Jacks
Weak Positive Correlation
0.29
1 player
K Verreynne
2 player
R Rossouw
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
K Verreynne
2 player
K Verreynne
Strong Positive Correlation
0.16
1 player
K Verreynne
2 player
E Bosch
No Correlation
0.19
1 player
K Verreynne
2 player
S Muthusamy
No Correlation
-0.01
1 player
K Verreynne
2 player
D Dupavillon
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
K Verreynne
2 player
M Ackerman
Weak Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
K Verreynne
2 player
M Pretorius
No Correlation
0.34
1 player
E Bosch
2 player
J Neesham
Weak Positive Correlation
0.01
1 player
E Bosch
2 player
R Gurbaz
No Correlation
0.47
1 player
E Bosch
2 player
L Livingstone
Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
E Bosch
2 player
W Jacks
No Correlation
0.38
1 player
E Bosch
2 player
R Rossouw
Weak Positive Correlation
0.16
1 player
E Bosch
2 player
K Verreynne
No Correlation
1
1 player
E Bosch
2 player
E Bosch
Strong Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
E Bosch
2 player
S Muthusamy
Weak Positive Correlation
0.45
1 player
E Bosch
2 player
D Dupavillon
Positive Correlation
0.69
1 player
E Bosch
2 player
M Ackerman
Positive Correlation
0.37
1 player
E Bosch
2 player
M Pretorius
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
S Muthusamy
2 player
J Neesham
No Correlation
0.27
1 player
S Muthusamy
2 player
R Gurbaz
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
S Muthusamy
2 player
L Livingstone
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
S Muthusamy
2 player
W Jacks
Weak Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
S Muthusamy
2 player
R Rossouw
No Correlation
0.19
1 player
S Muthusamy
2 player
K Verreynne
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
S Muthusamy
2 player
E Bosch
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
S Muthusamy
2 player
S Muthusamy
Strong Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
S Muthusamy
2 player
D Dupavillon
Weak Positive Correlation
0.6
1 player
S Muthusamy
2 player
M Ackerman
Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
S Muthusamy
2 player
M Pretorius
Weak Positive Correlation
0.49
1 player
D Dupavillon
2 player
J Neesham
Positive Correlation
-0.13
1 player
D Dupavillon
2 player
R Gurbaz
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
D Dupavillon
2 player
L Livingstone
Weak Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
D Dupavillon
2 player
W Jacks
No Correlation
0.22
1 player
D Dupavillon
2 player
R Rossouw
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.01
1 player
D Dupavillon
2 player
K Verreynne
No Correlation
0.45
1 player
D Dupavillon
2 player
E Bosch
Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
D Dupavillon
2 player
S Muthusamy
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
D Dupavillon
2 player
D Dupavillon
Strong Positive Correlation
0.85
1 player
D Dupavillon
2 player
M Ackerman
Strong Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
D Dupavillon
2 player
M Pretorius
Weak Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
M Ackerman
2 player
J Neesham
Weak Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
M Ackerman
2 player
R Gurbaz
Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
M Ackerman
2 player
L Livingstone
Weak Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
M Ackerman
2 player
W Jacks
Weak Positive Correlation
0.59
1 player
M Ackerman
2 player
R Rossouw
Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
M Ackerman
2 player
K Verreynne
Weak Positive Correlation
0.69
1 player
M Ackerman
2 player
E Bosch
Positive Correlation
0.6
1 player
M Ackerman
2 player
S Muthusamy
Positive Correlation
0.85
1 player
M Ackerman
2 player
D Dupavillon
Strong Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M Ackerman
2 player
M Ackerman
Strong Positive Correlation
0.76
1 player
M Ackerman
2 player
M Pretorius
Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
M Pretorius
2 player
J Neesham
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
M Pretorius
2 player
R Gurbaz
Weak Positive Correlation
0.57
1 player
M Pretorius
2 player
L Livingstone
Positive Correlation
0.54
1 player
M Pretorius
2 player
W Jacks
Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
M Pretorius
2 player
R Rossouw
Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
M Pretorius
2 player
K Verreynne
No Correlation
0.37
1 player
M Pretorius
2 player
E Bosch
Weak Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
M Pretorius
2 player
S Muthusamy
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
M Pretorius
2 player
D Dupavillon
Weak Positive Correlation
0.76
1 player
M Pretorius
2 player
M Ackerman
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M Pretorius
2 player
M Pretorius
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick L Livingstone and R Rossouw together
Positive Correlation

Pick E Bosch and M Ackerman together
Positive Correlation

Pick S Muthusamy and M Ackerman together
Positive Correlation

Pick D Dupavillon and M Ackerman together
Strong Positive Correlation

Pick M Ackerman and M Pretorius together
Positive Correlation

High Performing Players

1 W Jacks

BAT
Similar Perfomance
L Livingstone 0.58
M Pretorius 0.54
S Muthusamy 0.33
K Verreynne 0.3
R Gurbaz 0.29
M Ackerman 0.26
J Neesham 0.14
E Bosch 0.13
D Dupavillon 0.12
R Rossouw 0.11

2 J Neesham

AR
Similar Perfomance
D Dupavillon 0.49
L Livingstone 0.42
M Ackerman 0.39
K Verreynne 0.35
E Bosch 0.34
R Rossouw 0.28
M Pretorius 0.23
W Jacks 0.14
R Gurbaz 0.04
Opposite Perfomance
S Muthusamy -0.14

3 E Bosch

BOW
Similar Perfomance
M Ackerman 0.69
L Livingstone 0.47
D Dupavillon 0.45
R Rossouw 0.38
M Pretorius 0.37
J Neesham 0.34
S Muthusamy 0.23
K Verreynne 0.16
W Jacks 0.13
R Gurbaz 0.01

4 R Rossouw

BAT
Similar Perfomance
L Livingstone 0.6
R Gurbaz 0.59
M Ackerman 0.59
M Pretorius 0.42
E Bosch 0.38
K Verreynne 0.29
J Neesham 0.28
D Dupavillon 0.22
S Muthusamy 0.17
W Jacks 0.11

5 K Verreynne

WK
Similar Perfomance
L Livingstone 0.52
J Neesham 0.35
W Jacks 0.3
R Rossouw 0.29
M Ackerman 0.28
R Gurbaz 0.24
S Muthusamy 0.19
M Pretorius 0.17
E Bosch 0.16
Opposite Perfomance
D Dupavillon -0.01

Best SEC Player Combinations

Best SEC Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
Z Crawley BAT SEC
S Harmer BOW SEC
R Gleeson BOW SEC
T Abell BAT SEC
C Overton BOW SEC
M Jansen AR SEC
O Baartman BOW SEC
P Kruger AR SEC
T Stubbs WK SEC
D Bedingham BAT SEC
A Markram BAT SEC
Z Crawley
S Harmer
R Gleeson
T Abell
C Overton
M Jansen
O Baartman
P Kruger
T Stubbs
D Bedingham
A Markram
1
1 player
Z Crawley
2 player
Z Crawley
Strong Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
Z Crawley
2 player
S Harmer
Positive Correlation
-0.09
1 player
Z Crawley
2 player
R Gleeson
No Correlation
0.74
1 player
Z Crawley
2 player
T Abell
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
Z Crawley
2 player
C Overton
No Correlation
-0.3
1 player
Z Crawley
2 player
M Jansen
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.2
1 player
Z Crawley
2 player
O Baartman
No Correlation
1
1 player
Z Crawley
2 player
P Kruger
Strong Positive Correlation
0.54
1 player
Z Crawley
2 player
T Stubbs
Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
Z Crawley
2 player
D Bedingham
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
Z Crawley
2 player
A Markram
Weak Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
S Harmer
2 player
Z Crawley
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
S Harmer
2 player
S Harmer
Strong Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
S Harmer
2 player
R Gleeson
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.01
1 player
S Harmer
2 player
T Abell
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
S Harmer
2 player
C Overton
Positive Correlation
-0.12
1 player
S Harmer
2 player
M Jansen
No Correlation
0.03
1 player
S Harmer
2 player
O Baartman
No Correlation
0.36
1 player
S Harmer
2 player
P Kruger
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
S Harmer
2 player
T Stubbs
Weak Positive Correlation
0.29
1 player
S Harmer
2 player
D Bedingham
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
S Harmer
2 player
A Markram
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.09
1 player
R Gleeson
2 player
Z Crawley
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
R Gleeson
2 player
S Harmer
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
R Gleeson
2 player
R Gleeson
Strong Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
R Gleeson
2 player
T Abell
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
R Gleeson
2 player
C Overton
Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
R Gleeson
2 player
M Jansen
Positive Correlation
0.67
1 player
R Gleeson
2 player
O Baartman
Positive Correlation
-0.4
1 player
R Gleeson
2 player
P Kruger
Weak Negative Correlation
0.3
1 player
R Gleeson
2 player
T Stubbs
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
R Gleeson
2 player
D Bedingham
No Correlation
0.09
1 player
R Gleeson
2 player
A Markram
No Correlation
0.74
1 player
T Abell
2 player
Z Crawley
Positive Correlation
-0.01
1 player
T Abell
2 player
S Harmer
No Correlation
0.09
1 player
T Abell
2 player
R Gleeson
No Correlation
1
1 player
T Abell
2 player
T Abell
Strong Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
T Abell
2 player
C Overton
Positive Correlation
-0.02
1 player
T Abell
2 player
M Jansen
No Correlation
-0.05
1 player
T Abell
2 player
O Baartman
No Correlation
0.17
1 player
T Abell
2 player
P Kruger
No Correlation
0.48
1 player
T Abell
2 player
T Stubbs
Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
T Abell
2 player
D Bedingham
Weak Positive Correlation
0.05
1 player
T Abell
2 player
A Markram
No Correlation
0
1 player
C Overton
2 player
Z Crawley
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
C Overton
2 player
S Harmer
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
C Overton
2 player
R Gleeson
Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
C Overton
2 player
T Abell
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
C Overton
2 player
C Overton
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
C Overton
2 player
M Jansen
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
C Overton
2 player
O Baartman
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
C Overton
2 player
P Kruger
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
C Overton
2 player
T Stubbs
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
C Overton
2 player
D Bedingham
No Correlation
0
1 player
C Overton
2 player
A Markram
No Correlation
-0.3
1 player
M Jansen
2 player
Z Crawley
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.12
1 player
M Jansen
2 player
S Harmer
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
M Jansen
2 player
R Gleeson
Positive Correlation
-0.02
1 player
M Jansen
2 player
T Abell
No Correlation
0
1 player
M Jansen
2 player
C Overton
No Correlation
1
1 player
M Jansen
2 player
M Jansen
Strong Positive Correlation
0.59
1 player
M Jansen
2 player
O Baartman
Positive Correlation
-0.11
1 player
M Jansen
2 player
P Kruger
No Correlation
0.39
1 player
M Jansen
2 player
T Stubbs
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.39
1 player
M Jansen
2 player
D Bedingham
Weak Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
M Jansen
2 player
A Markram
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.2
1 player
O Baartman
2 player
Z Crawley
No Correlation
0.03
1 player
O Baartman
2 player
S Harmer
No Correlation
0.67
1 player
O Baartman
2 player
R Gleeson
Positive Correlation
-0.05
1 player
O Baartman
2 player
T Abell
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
O Baartman
2 player
C Overton
Positive Correlation
0.59
1 player
O Baartman
2 player
M Jansen
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
O Baartman
2 player
O Baartman
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.01
1 player
O Baartman
2 player
P Kruger
No Correlation
0.27
1 player
O Baartman
2 player
T Stubbs
Weak Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
O Baartman
2 player
D Bedingham
No Correlation
0.38
1 player
O Baartman
2 player
A Markram
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
P Kruger
2 player
Z Crawley
Strong Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
P Kruger
2 player
S Harmer
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.4
1 player
P Kruger
2 player
R Gleeson
Weak Negative Correlation
0.17
1 player
P Kruger
2 player
T Abell
No Correlation
0
1 player
P Kruger
2 player
C Overton
No Correlation
-0.11
1 player
P Kruger
2 player
M Jansen
No Correlation
-0.01
1 player
P Kruger
2 player
O Baartman
No Correlation
1
1 player
P Kruger
2 player
P Kruger
Strong Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
P Kruger
2 player
T Stubbs
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
P Kruger
2 player
D Bedingham
Strong Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
P Kruger
2 player
A Markram
Weak Positive Correlation
0.54
1 player
T Stubbs
2 player
Z Crawley
Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
T Stubbs
2 player
S Harmer
Weak Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
T Stubbs
2 player
R Gleeson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.48
1 player
T Stubbs
2 player
T Abell
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
T Stubbs
2 player
C Overton
Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
T Stubbs
2 player
M Jansen
Weak Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
T Stubbs
2 player
O Baartman
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
T Stubbs
2 player
P Kruger
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
T Stubbs
2 player
T Stubbs
Strong Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
T Stubbs
2 player
D Bedingham
Weak Positive Correlation
0.41
1 player
T Stubbs
2 player
A Markram
Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
D Bedingham
2 player
Z Crawley
Weak Positive Correlation
0.29
1 player
D Bedingham
2 player
S Harmer
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
D Bedingham
2 player
R Gleeson
No Correlation
0.34
1 player
D Bedingham
2 player
T Abell
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
D Bedingham
2 player
C Overton
No Correlation
-0.39
1 player
D Bedingham
2 player
M Jansen
Weak Negative Correlation
0.1
1 player
D Bedingham
2 player
O Baartman
No Correlation
1
1 player
D Bedingham
2 player
P Kruger
Strong Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
D Bedingham
2 player
T Stubbs
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
D Bedingham
2 player
D Bedingham
Strong Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
D Bedingham
2 player
A Markram
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
A Markram
2 player
Z Crawley
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
A Markram
2 player
S Harmer
Weak Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
A Markram
2 player
R Gleeson
No Correlation
0.05
1 player
A Markram
2 player
T Abell
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Markram
2 player
C Overton
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
A Markram
2 player
M Jansen
Weak Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
A Markram
2 player
O Baartman
Weak Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
A Markram
2 player
P Kruger
Weak Positive Correlation
0.41
1 player
A Markram
2 player
T Stubbs
Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
A Markram
2 player
D Bedingham
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
A Markram
2 player
A Markram
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick Z Crawley and T Abell together
Positive Correlation

Pick Z Crawley and P Kruger together
Strong Positive Correlation

Pick R Gleeson and C Overton together
Positive Correlation

Pick R Gleeson and O Baartman together
Positive Correlation

Pick C Overton and O Baartman together
Positive Correlation

Pick C Overton and T Stubbs together
Positive Correlation

Pick P Kruger and D Bedingham together
Strong Positive Correlation

High Performing Players

1 M Jansen

AR
Similar Perfomance
O Baartman 0.59
R Gleeson 0.42
T Stubbs 0.39
A Markram 0.33
Opposite Perfomance
D Bedingham -0.39
Z Crawley -0.3
S Harmer -0.12
P Kruger -0.11
T Abell -0.02

2 A Markram

BAT
Similar Perfomance
T Stubbs 0.41
O Baartman 0.38
M Jansen 0.33
D Bedingham 0.3
P Kruger 0.27
S Harmer 0.25
Z Crawley 0.2
R Gleeson 0.09
T Abell 0.05

3 O Baartman

BOW
Similar Perfomance
C Overton 0.7
R Gleeson 0.67
M Jansen 0.59
A Markram 0.38
T Stubbs 0.27
D Bedingham 0.1
S Harmer 0.03
Opposite Perfomance
Z Crawley -0.2
T Abell -0.05
P Kruger -0.01

4 T Stubbs

WK
Similar Perfomance
C Overton 0.7
Z Crawley 0.54
T Abell 0.48
A Markram 0.41
M Jansen 0.39
R Gleeson 0.3
O Baartman 0.27
D Bedingham 0.27
S Harmer 0.25
P Kruger 0.2

5 T Abell

BAT
Similar Perfomance
Z Crawley 0.74
T Stubbs 0.48
C Overton 0.4
D Bedingham 0.34
P Kruger 0.17
R Gleeson 0.09
A Markram 0.05
Opposite Perfomance
O Baartman -0.05
M Jansen -0.02
S Harmer -0.01

Best PC Player Combinations

Best PC Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
J Neesham AR PC
R Gurbaz WK PC
L Livingstone AR PC
W Jacks BAT PC
R Rossouw BAT PC
K Verreynne WK PC
E Bosch BOW PC
S Muthusamy AR PC
D Dupavillon BOW PC
M Ackerman BAT PC
M Pretorius BOW PC
J Neesham
R Gurbaz
L Livingstone
W Jacks
R Rossouw
K Verreynne
E Bosch
S Muthusamy
D Dupavillon
M Ackerman
M Pretorius
1
1 player
J Neesham
2 player
J Neesham
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.43
1 player
J Neesham
2 player
R Gurbaz
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
J Neesham
2 player
L Livingstone
No Correlation
0
1 player
J Neesham
2 player
W Jacks
No Correlation
0.04
1 player
J Neesham
2 player
R Rossouw
No Correlation
0.17
1 player
J Neesham
2 player
K Verreynne
No Correlation
-0.12
1 player
J Neesham
2 player
E Bosch
No Correlation
-0.62
1 player
J Neesham
2 player
S Muthusamy
Negative Correlation
0.43
1 player
J Neesham
2 player
D Dupavillon
Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
J Neesham
2 player
M Ackerman
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
J Neesham
2 player
M Pretorius
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.43
1 player
R Gurbaz
2 player
J Neesham
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
R Gurbaz
2 player
R Gurbaz
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
R Gurbaz
2 player
L Livingstone
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
R Gurbaz
2 player
W Jacks
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
R Gurbaz
2 player
R Rossouw
No Correlation
-0.43
1 player
R Gurbaz
2 player
K Verreynne
Negative Correlation
-0.43
1 player
R Gurbaz
2 player
E Bosch
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
R Gurbaz
2 player
S Muthusamy
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
R Gurbaz
2 player
D Dupavillon
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
R Gurbaz
2 player
M Ackerman
No Correlation
-0.35
1 player
R Gurbaz
2 player
M Pretorius
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
L Livingstone
2 player
J Neesham
No Correlation
0
1 player
L Livingstone
2 player
R Gurbaz
No Correlation
1
1 player
L Livingstone
2 player
L Livingstone
Strong Positive Correlation
0.67
1 player
L Livingstone
2 player
W Jacks
Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
L Livingstone
2 player
R Rossouw
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
L Livingstone
2 player
K Verreynne
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.67
1 player
L Livingstone
2 player
E Bosch
Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
L Livingstone
2 player
S Muthusamy
No Correlation
0
1 player
L Livingstone
2 player
D Dupavillon
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
L Livingstone
2 player
M Ackerman
Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
L Livingstone
2 player
M Pretorius
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
W Jacks
2 player
J Neesham
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
W Jacks
2 player
R Gurbaz
No Correlation
0.67
1 player
W Jacks
2 player
L Livingstone
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
W Jacks
2 player
W Jacks
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.39
1 player
W Jacks
2 player
R Rossouw
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.07
1 player
W Jacks
2 player
K Verreynne
No Correlation
-0.48
1 player
W Jacks
2 player
E Bosch
Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
W Jacks
2 player
S Muthusamy
No Correlation
-0.11
1 player
W Jacks
2 player
D Dupavillon
No Correlation
-0.71
1 player
W Jacks
2 player
M Ackerman
Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
W Jacks
2 player
M Pretorius
No Correlation
0.04
1 player
R Rossouw
2 player
J Neesham
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
R Rossouw
2 player
R Gurbaz
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
R Rossouw
2 player
L Livingstone
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.39
1 player
R Rossouw
2 player
W Jacks
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
R Rossouw
2 player
R Rossouw
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.07
1 player
R Rossouw
2 player
K Verreynne
No Correlation
0.21
1 player
R Rossouw
2 player
E Bosch
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.11
1 player
R Rossouw
2 player
S Muthusamy
No Correlation
0
1 player
R Rossouw
2 player
D Dupavillon
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
R Rossouw
2 player
M Ackerman
No Correlation
-0.4
1 player
R Rossouw
2 player
M Pretorius
Weak Negative Correlation
0.17
1 player
K Verreynne
2 player
J Neesham
No Correlation
-0.43
1 player
K Verreynne
2 player
R Gurbaz
Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
K Verreynne
2 player
L Livingstone
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.07
1 player
K Verreynne
2 player
W Jacks
No Correlation
-0.07
1 player
K Verreynne
2 player
R Rossouw
No Correlation
1
1 player
K Verreynne
2 player
K Verreynne
Strong Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
K Verreynne
2 player
E Bosch
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
K Verreynne
2 player
S Muthusamy
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
K Verreynne
2 player
D Dupavillon
No Correlation
-0.67
1 player
K Verreynne
2 player
M Ackerman
Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
K Verreynne
2 player
M Pretorius
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.12
1 player
E Bosch
2 player
J Neesham
No Correlation
-0.43
1 player
E Bosch
2 player
R Gurbaz
Negative Correlation
-0.67
1 player
E Bosch
2 player
L Livingstone
Negative Correlation
-0.48
1 player
E Bosch
2 player
W Jacks
Negative Correlation
0.21
1 player
E Bosch
2 player
R Rossouw
Weak Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
E Bosch
2 player
K Verreynne
No Correlation
1
1 player
E Bosch
2 player
E Bosch
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.11
1 player
E Bosch
2 player
S Muthusamy
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
E Bosch
2 player
D Dupavillon
Weak Positive Correlation
0.71
1 player
E Bosch
2 player
M Ackerman
Positive Correlation
-0.2
1 player
E Bosch
2 player
M Pretorius
No Correlation
-0.62
1 player
S Muthusamy
2 player
J Neesham
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
S Muthusamy
2 player
R Gurbaz
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
S Muthusamy
2 player
L Livingstone
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
S Muthusamy
2 player
W Jacks
No Correlation
-0.11
1 player
S Muthusamy
2 player
R Rossouw
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
S Muthusamy
2 player
K Verreynne
No Correlation
-0.11
1 player
S Muthusamy
2 player
E Bosch
No Correlation
1
1 player
S Muthusamy
2 player
S Muthusamy
Strong Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
S Muthusamy
2 player
D Dupavillon
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
S Muthusamy
2 player
M Ackerman
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
S Muthusamy
2 player
M Pretorius
Weak Negative Correlation
0.43
1 player
D Dupavillon
2 player
J Neesham
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
D Dupavillon
2 player
R Gurbaz
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
D Dupavillon
2 player
L Livingstone
No Correlation
-0.11
1 player
D Dupavillon
2 player
W Jacks
No Correlation
0
1 player
D Dupavillon
2 player
R Rossouw
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
D Dupavillon
2 player
K Verreynne
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
D Dupavillon
2 player
E Bosch
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
D Dupavillon
2 player
S Muthusamy
No Correlation
1
1 player
D Dupavillon
2 player
D Dupavillon
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
D Dupavillon
2 player
M Ackerman
No Correlation
-0.23
1 player
D Dupavillon
2 player
M Pretorius
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
M Ackerman
2 player
J Neesham
No Correlation
0
1 player
M Ackerman
2 player
R Gurbaz
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
M Ackerman
2 player
L Livingstone
Negative Correlation
-0.71
1 player
M Ackerman
2 player
W Jacks
Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
M Ackerman
2 player
R Rossouw
No Correlation
-0.67
1 player
M Ackerman
2 player
K Verreynne
Negative Correlation
0.71
1 player
M Ackerman
2 player
E Bosch
Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
M Ackerman
2 player
S Muthusamy
No Correlation
0
1 player
M Ackerman
2 player
D Dupavillon
No Correlation
1
1 player
M Ackerman
2 player
M Ackerman
Strong Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
M Ackerman
2 player
M Pretorius
Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
M Pretorius
2 player
J Neesham
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
M Pretorius
2 player
R Gurbaz
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
M Pretorius
2 player
L Livingstone
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
M Pretorius
2 player
W Jacks
No Correlation
-0.4
1 player
M Pretorius
2 player
R Rossouw
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
M Pretorius
2 player
K Verreynne
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.2
1 player
M Pretorius
2 player
E Bosch
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
M Pretorius
2 player
S Muthusamy
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
M Pretorius
2 player
D Dupavillon
Weak Negative Correlation
0.42
1 player
M Pretorius
2 player
M Ackerman
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M Pretorius
2 player
M Pretorius
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick L Livingstone and W Jacks together
Positive Correlation

Pick J Neesham and S Muthusamy together
Negative Correlation

Pick R Gurbaz and D Dupavillon together
Negative Correlation

Pick L Livingstone and E Bosch together
Negative Correlation

Pick L Livingstone and M Ackerman together
Negative Correlation

Pick W Jacks and M Ackerman together
Negative Correlation

Pick K Verreynne and M Ackerman together
Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 J Neesham

AR
Similar Perfomance
D Dupavillon 0.43
M Pretorius 0.2
K Verreynne 0.17
R Rossouw 0.04
Opposite Perfomance
S Muthusamy -0.62
R Gurbaz -0.43
M Ackerman -0.14
E Bosch -0.12

2 W Jacks

BAT
Similar Perfomance
L Livingstone 0.67
S Muthusamy 0.14
Opposite Perfomance
M Ackerman -0.71
E Bosch -0.48
R Rossouw -0.39
R Gurbaz -0.14
M Pretorius -0.14
D Dupavillon -0.11
K Verreynne -0.07

3 E Bosch

BOW
Similar Perfomance
M Ackerman 0.71
R Rossouw 0.21
D Dupavillon 0.2
K Verreynne 0.07
Opposite Perfomance
L Livingstone -0.67
W Jacks -0.48
R Gurbaz -0.43
M Pretorius -0.2
J Neesham -0.12
S Muthusamy -0.11

4 K Verreynne

WK
Similar Perfomance
J Neesham 0.17
D Dupavillon 0.14
S Muthusamy 0.11
E Bosch 0.07
Opposite Perfomance
M Ackerman -0.67
R Gurbaz -0.43
L Livingstone -0.33
M Pretorius -0.33
W Jacks -0.07
R Rossouw -0.07

5 S Muthusamy

AR
Similar Perfomance
W Jacks 0.14
D Dupavillon 0.14
K Verreynne 0.11
Opposite Perfomance
J Neesham -0.62
M Pretorius -0.33
L Livingstone -0.14
M Ackerman -0.14
R Rossouw -0.11
E Bosch -0.11

Best SEC Player Combinations

Best SEC Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
Z Crawley BAT SEC
S Harmer BOW SEC
R Gleeson BOW SEC
T Abell BAT SEC
C Overton BOW SEC
M Jansen AR SEC
O Baartman BOW SEC
P Kruger AR SEC
T Stubbs WK SEC
D Bedingham BAT SEC
A Markram BAT SEC
Z Crawley
S Harmer
R Gleeson
T Abell
C Overton
M Jansen
O Baartman
P Kruger
T Stubbs
D Bedingham
A Markram
1
1 player
Z Crawley
2 player
Z Crawley
Strong Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
Z Crawley
2 player
S Harmer
Positive Correlation
-0.43
1 player
Z Crawley
2 player
R Gleeson
Negative Correlation
0.71
1 player
Z Crawley
2 player
T Abell
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
Z Crawley
2 player
C Overton
Negative Correlation
-0.43
1 player
Z Crawley
2 player
M Jansen
Negative Correlation
-0.42
1 player
Z Crawley
2 player
O Baartman
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
Z Crawley
2 player
P Kruger
Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
Z Crawley
2 player
T Stubbs
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
Z Crawley
2 player
D Bedingham
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
Z Crawley
2 player
A Markram
No Correlation
0.43
1 player
S Harmer
2 player
Z Crawley
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
S Harmer
2 player
S Harmer
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.5
1 player
S Harmer
2 player
R Gleeson
Negative Correlation
-0.12
1 player
S Harmer
2 player
T Abell
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
S Harmer
2 player
C Overton
Negative Correlation
-0.44
1 player
S Harmer
2 player
M Jansen
Negative Correlation
-0.38
1 player
S Harmer
2 player
O Baartman
Weak Negative Correlation
0.09
1 player
S Harmer
2 player
P Kruger
No Correlation
-0.16
1 player
S Harmer
2 player
T Stubbs
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
S Harmer
2 player
D Bedingham
No Correlation
0.16
1 player
S Harmer
2 player
A Markram
No Correlation
-0.43
1 player
R Gleeson
2 player
Z Crawley
Negative Correlation
-0.5
1 player
R Gleeson
2 player
S Harmer
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
R Gleeson
2 player
R Gleeson
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
R Gleeson
2 player
T Abell
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
R Gleeson
2 player
C Overton
Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
R Gleeson
2 player
M Jansen
Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
R Gleeson
2 player
O Baartman
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
R Gleeson
2 player
P Kruger
Negative Correlation
-0.5
1 player
R Gleeson
2 player
T Stubbs
Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
R Gleeson
2 player
D Bedingham
No Correlation
-0.5
1 player
R Gleeson
2 player
A Markram
Negative Correlation
0.71
1 player
T Abell
2 player
Z Crawley
Positive Correlation
-0.12
1 player
T Abell
2 player
S Harmer
No Correlation
0
1 player
T Abell
2 player
R Gleeson
No Correlation
1
1 player
T Abell
2 player
T Abell
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
T Abell
2 player
C Overton
Negative Correlation
-0.16
1 player
T Abell
2 player
M Jansen
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
T Abell
2 player
O Baartman
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
T Abell
2 player
P Kruger
Weak Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
T Abell
2 player
T Stubbs
Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
T Abell
2 player
D Bedingham
No Correlation
-0.26
1 player
T Abell
2 player
A Markram
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
C Overton
2 player
Z Crawley
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
C Overton
2 player
S Harmer
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
C Overton
2 player
R Gleeson
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
C Overton
2 player
T Abell
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
C Overton
2 player
C Overton
Strong Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
C Overton
2 player
M Jansen
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
C Overton
2 player
O Baartman
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
C Overton
2 player
P Kruger
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
C Overton
2 player
T Stubbs
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
C Overton
2 player
D Bedingham
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
C Overton
2 player
A Markram
Negative Correlation
-0.43
1 player
M Jansen
2 player
Z Crawley
Negative Correlation
-0.44
1 player
M Jansen
2 player
S Harmer
Negative Correlation
0.5
1 player
M Jansen
2 player
R Gleeson
Positive Correlation
-0.16
1 player
M Jansen
2 player
T Abell
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Jansen
2 player
C Overton
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M Jansen
2 player
M Jansen
Strong Positive Correlation
0.78
1 player
M Jansen
2 player
O Baartman
Positive Correlation
-0.4
1 player
M Jansen
2 player
P Kruger
Weak Negative Correlation
0.1
1 player
M Jansen
2 player
T Stubbs
No Correlation
-0.43
1 player
M Jansen
2 player
D Bedingham
Negative Correlation
-0.03
1 player
M Jansen
2 player
A Markram
No Correlation
-0.42
1 player
O Baartman
2 player
Z Crawley
Negative Correlation
-0.38
1 player
O Baartman
2 player
S Harmer
Weak Negative Correlation
0.42
1 player
O Baartman
2 player
R Gleeson
Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
O Baartman
2 player
T Abell
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
O Baartman
2 player
C Overton
Positive Correlation
0.78
1 player
O Baartman
2 player
M Jansen
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
O Baartman
2 player
O Baartman
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.5
1 player
O Baartman
2 player
P Kruger
Negative Correlation
0.16
1 player
O Baartman
2 player
T Stubbs
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
O Baartman
2 player
D Bedingham
No Correlation
0.47
1 player
O Baartman
2 player
A Markram
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
P Kruger
2 player
Z Crawley
Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
P Kruger
2 player
S Harmer
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
P Kruger
2 player
R Gleeson
Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
P Kruger
2 player
T Abell
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
P Kruger
2 player
C Overton
Negative Correlation
-0.4
1 player
P Kruger
2 player
M Jansen
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.5
1 player
P Kruger
2 player
O Baartman
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
P Kruger
2 player
P Kruger
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.09
1 player
P Kruger
2 player
T Stubbs
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
P Kruger
2 player
D Bedingham
Positive Correlation
-0.27
1 player
P Kruger
2 player
A Markram
Weak Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
T Stubbs
2 player
Z Crawley
No Correlation
-0.16
1 player
T Stubbs
2 player
S Harmer
No Correlation
-0.5
1 player
T Stubbs
2 player
R Gleeson
Negative Correlation
0.47
1 player
T Stubbs
2 player
T Abell
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
T Stubbs
2 player
C Overton
Negative Correlation
0.1
1 player
T Stubbs
2 player
M Jansen
No Correlation
0.16
1 player
T Stubbs
2 player
O Baartman
No Correlation
-0.09
1 player
T Stubbs
2 player
P Kruger
No Correlation
1
1 player
T Stubbs
2 player
T Stubbs
Strong Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
T Stubbs
2 player
D Bedingham
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
T Stubbs
2 player
A Markram
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
D Bedingham
2 player
Z Crawley
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
D Bedingham
2 player
S Harmer
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
D Bedingham
2 player
R Gleeson
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
D Bedingham
2 player
T Abell
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
D Bedingham
2 player
C Overton
Negative Correlation
-0.43
1 player
D Bedingham
2 player
M Jansen
Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
D Bedingham
2 player
O Baartman
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
D Bedingham
2 player
P Kruger
Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
D Bedingham
2 player
T Stubbs
No Correlation
1
1 player
D Bedingham
2 player
D Bedingham
Strong Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
D Bedingham
2 player
A Markram
Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
A Markram
2 player
Z Crawley
No Correlation
0.16
1 player
A Markram
2 player
S Harmer
No Correlation
-0.5
1 player
A Markram
2 player
R Gleeson
Negative Correlation
-0.26
1 player
A Markram
2 player
T Abell
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
A Markram
2 player
C Overton
Negative Correlation
-0.03
1 player
A Markram
2 player
M Jansen
No Correlation
0.47
1 player
A Markram
2 player
O Baartman
Positive Correlation
-0.27
1 player
A Markram
2 player
P Kruger
Weak Negative Correlation
0.2
1 player
A Markram
2 player
T Stubbs
Weak Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
A Markram
2 player
D Bedingham
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
A Markram
2 player
A Markram
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick C Overton and M Jansen together
Positive Correlation

Pick M Jansen and O Baartman together
Positive Correlation

Pick Z Crawley and C Overton together
Negative Correlation

Pick S Harmer and C Overton together
Negative Correlation

Pick R Gleeson and P Kruger together
Negative Correlation

Pick T Abell and C Overton together
Negative Correlation

Pick C Overton and P Kruger together
Negative Correlation

Pick C Overton and D Bedingham together
Negative Correlation

Pick C Overton and A Markram together
Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 M Jansen

AR
Similar Perfomance
O Baartman 0.78
C Overton 0.7
R Gleeson 0.5
T Stubbs 0.1
Opposite Perfomance
S Harmer -0.44
Z Crawley -0.43
D Bedingham -0.43
P Kruger -0.4
T Abell -0.16
A Markram -0.03

2 A Markram

BAT
Similar Perfomance
O Baartman 0.47
D Bedingham 0.43
T Stubbs 0.2
S Harmer 0.16
Opposite Perfomance
C Overton -0.7
R Gleeson -0.5
P Kruger -0.27
T Abell -0.26
Z Crawley -0.14
M Jansen -0.03

3 T Stubbs

WK
Similar Perfomance
T Abell 0.47
A Markram 0.2
O Baartman 0.16
Z Crawley 0.14
D Bedingham 0.14
M Jansen 0.1
Opposite Perfomance
C Overton -0.7
R Gleeson -0.5
S Harmer -0.16
P Kruger -0.09

4 O Baartman

BOW
Similar Perfomance
M Jansen 0.78
C Overton 0.7
A Markram 0.47
R Gleeson 0.42
T Stubbs 0.16
Opposite Perfomance
P Kruger -0.5
Z Crawley -0.42
S Harmer -0.38
T Abell -0.14
D Bedingham -0.14

5 T Abell

BAT
Similar Perfomance
Z Crawley 0.71
T Stubbs 0.47
P Kruger 0.33
D Bedingham 0.14
Opposite Perfomance
C Overton -0.7
A Markram -0.26
M Jansen -0.16
O Baartman -0.14
S Harmer -0.12

More on PL Labs

PC vs SEC

PerfectLineup © 2025. All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer - PerfectLineup is an educational tool providing detailed analysis of sports players based on their past performances. We are not associated with any gaming activity and do not host any kind of paid or free contests or pool games. Our focus is purely on data-driven solutions to enhance our users' knowledge.

Perfect Lineup is not affiliated in any way to and claims no association, in any capacity whatsoever, with the Residents of the states of SIKKIM, ASSAM, ODISHA, TELANGANA, NAGALAND, ANDHRA PRADESH and where otherwise prohibited by law are not eligible to access Perfect Lineup.

This platform is applicable for users 18+ Only