Upcoming
Fixtures
View All
QUN-W 12 Jan 05:00 am TAS-W

Lineup Out

Allan Border Field
Womens National Cricket League

Best Player Combinations For
QUN-W vs TAS-W

How it Works?

This guide is super useful for identifying player combinations that are likely to score big. Use the filters to identify the best player combinations according to specific match scenarios.

Player correlate positively

Both players generally perform similarly when picked together. They either score high together or score low together. Maximise FPts by picking players that correlate positively with top players.

Player correlate negatively

Both players generally perform in an opposite manner. If one player scores high, the other usually scores low. Avoid picking players that correlate negatively with top player

More on PL Labs

QUN-W vs TAS-W

Show Player Combinations on the basis of:

Best QUN-W Player Combinations

Best QUN-W Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
L Winfield-Hill WK QUN-W
S Ginger AR QUN-W
L Hamilton BOW QUN-W
M Wrigley WK QUN-W
G Redmayne WK QUN-W
N Hancock BOW QUN-W
G Harris AR QUN-W
C Sippel BOW QUN-W
C Knott AR QUN-W
L Harris BAT QUN-W
J Jonassen AR QUN-W
L Winfield-Hill
S Ginger
L Hamilton
M Wrigley
G Redmayne
N Hancock
G Harris
C Sippel
C Knott
L Harris
J Jonassen
1
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
Strong Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
S Ginger
Weak Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
L Hamilton
No Correlation
0.21
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
M Wrigley
Weak Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
G Redmayne
Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
N Hancock
No Correlation
-0.07
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
G Harris
No Correlation
0.48
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
C Sippel
Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
C Knott
Weak Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
L Harris
Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
J Jonassen
Weak Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
S Ginger
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
S Ginger
2 player
S Ginger
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
S Ginger
2 player
L Hamilton
No Correlation
-0.18
1 player
S Ginger
2 player
M Wrigley
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
S Ginger
2 player
G Redmayne
Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
S Ginger
2 player
N Hancock
Weak Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
S Ginger
2 player
G Harris
No Correlation
0.13
1 player
S Ginger
2 player
C Sippel
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
S Ginger
2 player
C Knott
Weak Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
S Ginger
2 player
L Harris
No Correlation
0.21
1 player
S Ginger
2 player
J Jonassen
Weak Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
L Hamilton
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
No Correlation
0
1 player
L Hamilton
2 player
S Ginger
No Correlation
1
1 player
L Hamilton
2 player
L Hamilton
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
L Hamilton
2 player
M Wrigley
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
L Hamilton
2 player
G Redmayne
Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
L Hamilton
2 player
N Hancock
No Correlation
-0.5
1 player
L Hamilton
2 player
G Harris
Negative Correlation
-0.15
1 player
L Hamilton
2 player
C Sippel
No Correlation
-0.15
1 player
L Hamilton
2 player
C Knott
No Correlation
0
1 player
L Hamilton
2 player
L Harris
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
L Hamilton
2 player
J Jonassen
Weak Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
M Wrigley
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.18
1 player
M Wrigley
2 player
S Ginger
No Correlation
0
1 player
M Wrigley
2 player
L Hamilton
No Correlation
1
1 player
M Wrigley
2 player
M Wrigley
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.05
1 player
M Wrigley
2 player
G Redmayne
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
M Wrigley
2 player
N Hancock
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
M Wrigley
2 player
G Harris
Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
M Wrigley
2 player
C Sippel
No Correlation
-0.39
1 player
M Wrigley
2 player
C Knott
Weak Negative Correlation
0.85
1 player
M Wrigley
2 player
L Harris
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.43
1 player
M Wrigley
2 player
J Jonassen
Negative Correlation
0.42
1 player
G Redmayne
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
G Redmayne
2 player
S Ginger
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
G Redmayne
2 player
L Hamilton
Positive Correlation
-0.05
1 player
G Redmayne
2 player
M Wrigley
No Correlation
1
1 player
G Redmayne
2 player
G Redmayne
Strong Positive Correlation
0.19
1 player
G Redmayne
2 player
N Hancock
No Correlation
0.29
1 player
G Redmayne
2 player
G Harris
Weak Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
G Redmayne
2 player
C Sippel
Positive Correlation
0.05
1 player
G Redmayne
2 player
C Knott
No Correlation
0.03
1 player
G Redmayne
2 player
L Harris
No Correlation
0.41
1 player
G Redmayne
2 player
J Jonassen
Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
N Hancock
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
No Correlation
0.26
1 player
N Hancock
2 player
S Ginger
Weak Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
N Hancock
2 player
L Hamilton
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
N Hancock
2 player
M Wrigley
No Correlation
0.19
1 player
N Hancock
2 player
G Redmayne
No Correlation
1
1 player
N Hancock
2 player
N Hancock
Strong Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
N Hancock
2 player
G Harris
Weak Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
N Hancock
2 player
C Sippel
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
N Hancock
2 player
C Knott
Weak Positive Correlation
0.02
1 player
N Hancock
2 player
L Harris
No Correlation
0.09
1 player
N Hancock
2 player
J Jonassen
No Correlation
-0.07
1 player
G Harris
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
G Harris
2 player
S Ginger
No Correlation
-0.5
1 player
G Harris
2 player
L Hamilton
Negative Correlation
0.5
1 player
G Harris
2 player
M Wrigley
Positive Correlation
0.29
1 player
G Harris
2 player
G Redmayne
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
G Harris
2 player
N Hancock
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
G Harris
2 player
G Harris
Strong Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
G Harris
2 player
C Sippel
Positive Correlation
-0.05
1 player
G Harris
2 player
C Knott
No Correlation
0.21
1 player
G Harris
2 player
L Harris
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.06
1 player
G Harris
2 player
J Jonassen
No Correlation
0.48
1 player
C Sippel
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
C Sippel
2 player
S Ginger
No Correlation
-0.15
1 player
C Sippel
2 player
L Hamilton
No Correlation
0.1
1 player
C Sippel
2 player
M Wrigley
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
C Sippel
2 player
G Redmayne
Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
C Sippel
2 player
N Hancock
Weak Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
C Sippel
2 player
G Harris
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
C Sippel
2 player
C Sippel
Strong Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
C Sippel
2 player
C Knott
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
C Sippel
2 player
L Harris
Weak Positive Correlation
0.6
1 player
C Sippel
2 player
J Jonassen
Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
C Knott
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
C Knott
2 player
S Ginger
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.15
1 player
C Knott
2 player
L Hamilton
No Correlation
-0.39
1 player
C Knott
2 player
M Wrigley
Weak Negative Correlation
0.05
1 player
C Knott
2 player
G Redmayne
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
C Knott
2 player
N Hancock
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.05
1 player
C Knott
2 player
G Harris
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
C Knott
2 player
C Sippel
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
C Knott
2 player
C Knott
Strong Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
C Knott
2 player
L Harris
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
C Knott
2 player
J Jonassen
Weak Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
L Harris
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
L Harris
2 player
S Ginger
No Correlation
0
1 player
L Harris
2 player
L Hamilton
No Correlation
0.85
1 player
L Harris
2 player
M Wrigley
Strong Positive Correlation
0.03
1 player
L Harris
2 player
G Redmayne
No Correlation
0.02
1 player
L Harris
2 player
N Hancock
No Correlation
0.21
1 player
L Harris
2 player
G Harris
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
L Harris
2 player
C Sippel
Weak Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
L Harris
2 player
C Knott
No Correlation
1
1 player
L Harris
2 player
L Harris
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.15
1 player
L Harris
2 player
J Jonassen
No Correlation
0.27
1 player
J Jonassen
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
Weak Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
J Jonassen
2 player
S Ginger
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
J Jonassen
2 player
L Hamilton
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.43
1 player
J Jonassen
2 player
M Wrigley
Negative Correlation
0.41
1 player
J Jonassen
2 player
G Redmayne
Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
J Jonassen
2 player
N Hancock
No Correlation
-0.06
1 player
J Jonassen
2 player
G Harris
No Correlation
0.6
1 player
J Jonassen
2 player
C Sippel
Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
J Jonassen
2 player
C Knott
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.15
1 player
J Jonassen
2 player
L Harris
No Correlation
1
1 player
J Jonassen
2 player
J Jonassen
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick L Hamilton and G Redmayne together
Positive Correlation

Pick M Wrigley and L Harris together
Strong Positive Correlation

Pick C Sippel and J Jonassen together
Positive Correlation

High Performing Players

1 C Knott

AR
Similar Perfomance
J Jonassen 0.35
C Sippel 0.35
S Ginger 0.25
N Hancock 0.23
L Winfield-Hill 0.22
L Harris 0.15
G Redmayne 0.05
Opposite Perfomance
M Wrigley -0.39
L Hamilton -0.15
G Harris -0.05

2 C Sippel

BOW
Similar Perfomance
J Jonassen 0.6
G Harris 0.5
L Winfield-Hill 0.48
G Redmayne 0.42
C Knott 0.35
N Hancock 0.22
L Harris 0.2
S Ginger 0.13
M Wrigley 0.1
Opposite Perfomance
L Hamilton -0.15

3 J Jonassen

AR
Similar Perfomance
C Sippel 0.6
G Redmayne 0.41
L Hamilton 0.35
C Knott 0.35
L Winfield-Hill 0.27
S Ginger 0.21
N Hancock 0.09
Opposite Perfomance
M Wrigley -0.43
L Harris -0.15
G Harris -0.06

4 G Redmayne

WK
Similar Perfomance
L Hamilton 0.7
L Winfield-Hill 0.42
C Sippel 0.42
J Jonassen 0.41
S Ginger 0.4
G Harris 0.29
N Hancock 0.19
C Knott 0.05
L Harris 0.03
Opposite Perfomance
M Wrigley -0.05

5 N Hancock

BOW
Similar Perfomance
G Harris 0.33
S Ginger 0.26
C Knott 0.23
C Sippel 0.22
G Redmayne 0.19
L Hamilton 0.15
M Wrigley 0.14
L Winfield-Hill 0.11
J Jonassen 0.09
L Harris 0.02

Best TAS-W Player Combinations

Best TAS-W Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

No data found

No data found

No data found

Best QUN-W Player Combinations

Best QUN-W Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
L Winfield-Hill WK QUN-W
S Ginger AR QUN-W
L Hamilton BOW QUN-W
M Wrigley WK QUN-W
G Redmayne WK QUN-W
N Hancock BOW QUN-W
G Harris AR QUN-W
C Sippel BOW QUN-W
C Knott AR QUN-W
L Harris BAT QUN-W
J Jonassen AR QUN-W
L Winfield-Hill
S Ginger
L Hamilton
M Wrigley
G Redmayne
N Hancock
G Harris
C Sippel
C Knott
L Harris
J Jonassen
1
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
S Ginger
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
L Hamilton
No Correlation
0
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
M Wrigley
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
G Redmayne
No Correlation
0
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
N Hancock
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
G Harris
Weak Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
C Sippel
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
C Knott
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
L Harris
Weak Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
J Jonassen
No Correlation
-0.23
1 player
S Ginger
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
S Ginger
2 player
S Ginger
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
S Ginger
2 player
L Hamilton
No Correlation
-0.75
1 player
S Ginger
2 player
M Wrigley
Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
S Ginger
2 player
G Redmayne
Weak Positive Correlation
0.05
1 player
S Ginger
2 player
N Hancock
No Correlation
-0.25
1 player
S Ginger
2 player
G Harris
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.29
1 player
S Ginger
2 player
C Sippel
Weak Negative Correlation
0.05
1 player
S Ginger
2 player
C Knott
No Correlation
-0.47
1 player
S Ginger
2 player
L Harris
Negative Correlation
0.45
1 player
S Ginger
2 player
J Jonassen
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
L Hamilton
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
No Correlation
0
1 player
L Hamilton
2 player
S Ginger
No Correlation
1
1 player
L Hamilton
2 player
L Hamilton
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
L Hamilton
2 player
M Wrigley
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
L Hamilton
2 player
G Redmayne
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
L Hamilton
2 player
N Hancock
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
L Hamilton
2 player
G Harris
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
L Hamilton
2 player
C Sippel
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
L Hamilton
2 player
C Knott
No Correlation
0
1 player
L Hamilton
2 player
L Harris
No Correlation
0
1 player
L Hamilton
2 player
J Jonassen
No Correlation
0
1 player
M Wrigley
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
No Correlation
-0.75
1 player
M Wrigley
2 player
S Ginger
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
M Wrigley
2 player
L Hamilton
No Correlation
1
1 player
M Wrigley
2 player
M Wrigley
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
M Wrigley
2 player
G Redmayne
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
M Wrigley
2 player
N Hancock
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
M Wrigley
2 player
G Harris
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
M Wrigley
2 player
C Sippel
No Correlation
-0.75
1 player
M Wrigley
2 player
C Knott
Negative Correlation
0.75
1 player
M Wrigley
2 player
L Harris
Positive Correlation
-1
1 player
M Wrigley
2 player
J Jonassen
Strong Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
G Redmayne
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
G Redmayne
2 player
S Ginger
Weak Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
G Redmayne
2 player
L Hamilton
Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
G Redmayne
2 player
M Wrigley
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
G Redmayne
2 player
G Redmayne
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.04
1 player
G Redmayne
2 player
N Hancock
No Correlation
0
1 player
G Redmayne
2 player
G Harris
No Correlation
0.29
1 player
G Redmayne
2 player
C Sippel
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.3
1 player
G Redmayne
2 player
C Knott
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.37
1 player
G Redmayne
2 player
L Harris
Weak Negative Correlation
0.29
1 player
G Redmayne
2 player
J Jonassen
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
N Hancock
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
No Correlation
0.05
1 player
N Hancock
2 player
S Ginger
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
N Hancock
2 player
L Hamilton
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
N Hancock
2 player
M Wrigley
No Correlation
-0.04
1 player
N Hancock
2 player
G Redmayne
No Correlation
1
1 player
N Hancock
2 player
N Hancock
Strong Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
N Hancock
2 player
G Harris
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
N Hancock
2 player
C Sippel
No Correlation
-0.07
1 player
N Hancock
2 player
C Knott
No Correlation
-0.23
1 player
N Hancock
2 player
L Harris
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
N Hancock
2 player
J Jonassen
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
G Harris
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.25
1 player
G Harris
2 player
S Ginger
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
G Harris
2 player
L Hamilton
Negative Correlation
0.35
1 player
G Harris
2 player
M Wrigley
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
G Harris
2 player
G Redmayne
No Correlation
0.27
1 player
G Harris
2 player
N Hancock
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
G Harris
2 player
G Harris
Strong Positive Correlation
0.56
1 player
G Harris
2 player
C Sippel
Positive Correlation
-0.09
1 player
G Harris
2 player
C Knott
No Correlation
-0.11
1 player
G Harris
2 player
L Harris
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
G Harris
2 player
J Jonassen
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
C Sippel
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.29
1 player
C Sippel
2 player
S Ginger
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
C Sippel
2 player
L Hamilton
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
C Sippel
2 player
M Wrigley
No Correlation
0.29
1 player
C Sippel
2 player
G Redmayne
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
C Sippel
2 player
N Hancock
No Correlation
0.56
1 player
C Sippel
2 player
G Harris
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
C Sippel
2 player
C Sippel
Strong Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
C Sippel
2 player
C Knott
No Correlation
-0.2
1 player
C Sippel
2 player
L Harris
No Correlation
0.6
1 player
C Sippel
2 player
J Jonassen
Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
C Knott
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
No Correlation
0.05
1 player
C Knott
2 player
S Ginger
No Correlation
0
1 player
C Knott
2 player
L Hamilton
No Correlation
-0.75
1 player
C Knott
2 player
M Wrigley
Negative Correlation
-0.3
1 player
C Knott
2 player
G Redmayne
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.07
1 player
C Knott
2 player
N Hancock
No Correlation
-0.09
1 player
C Knott
2 player
G Harris
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
C Knott
2 player
C Sippel
No Correlation
1
1 player
C Knott
2 player
C Knott
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.15
1 player
C Knott
2 player
L Harris
No Correlation
0.57
1 player
C Knott
2 player
J Jonassen
Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
L Harris
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.47
1 player
L Harris
2 player
S Ginger
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
L Harris
2 player
L Hamilton
No Correlation
0.75
1 player
L Harris
2 player
M Wrigley
Positive Correlation
-0.37
1 player
L Harris
2 player
G Redmayne
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
L Harris
2 player
N Hancock
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.11
1 player
L Harris
2 player
G Harris
No Correlation
-0.2
1 player
L Harris
2 player
C Sippel
No Correlation
-0.15
1 player
L Harris
2 player
C Knott
No Correlation
1
1 player
L Harris
2 player
L Harris
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.69
1 player
L Harris
2 player
J Jonassen
Negative Correlation
0.11
1 player
J Jonassen
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
No Correlation
0.45
1 player
J Jonassen
2 player
S Ginger
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
J Jonassen
2 player
L Hamilton
No Correlation
-1
1 player
J Jonassen
2 player
M Wrigley
Strong Negative Correlation
0.29
1 player
J Jonassen
2 player
G Redmayne
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
J Jonassen
2 player
N Hancock
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
J Jonassen
2 player
G Harris
No Correlation
0.6
1 player
J Jonassen
2 player
C Sippel
Positive Correlation
0.57
1 player
J Jonassen
2 player
C Knott
Positive Correlation
-0.69
1 player
J Jonassen
2 player
L Harris
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
J Jonassen
2 player
J Jonassen
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

No data found

Pick S Ginger and M Wrigley together
Negative Correlation

Pick L Hamilton and N Hancock together
Negative Correlation

Pick L Hamilton and G Harris together
Negative Correlation

Pick L Hamilton and C Sippel together
Negative Correlation

Pick M Wrigley and C Knott together
Negative Correlation

Pick M Wrigley and J Jonassen together
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick L Harris and J Jonassen together
Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 C Knott

AR
Similar Perfomance
J Jonassen 0.57
L Winfield-Hill 0.14
C Sippel 0.08
S Ginger 0.05
Opposite Perfomance
M Wrigley -0.75
G Redmayne -0.3
L Harris -0.15
G Harris -0.09
N Hancock -0.07

2 N Hancock

BOW
Similar Perfomance
G Harris 0.27
S Ginger 0.05
Opposite Perfomance
L Hamilton -0.7
L Harris -0.23
J Jonassen -0.14
C Knott -0.07
G Redmayne -0.04

3 C Sippel

BOW
Similar Perfomance
J Jonassen 0.6
G Harris 0.56
L Winfield-Hill 0.33
G Redmayne 0.29
C Knott 0.08
Opposite Perfomance
L Hamilton -0.7
S Ginger -0.29
L Harris -0.2

4 G Redmayne

WK
Similar Perfomance
L Hamilton 0.7
S Ginger 0.33
C Sippel 0.29
J Jonassen 0.29
Opposite Perfomance
L Harris -0.37
C Knott -0.3
M Wrigley -0.25
L Winfield-Hill -0.14
N Hancock -0.04

5 J Jonassen

AR
Similar Perfomance
C Sippel 0.6
C Knott 0.57
S Ginger 0.45
G Redmayne 0.29
L Winfield-Hill 0.11
Opposite Perfomance
M Wrigley -1
L Harris -0.69
N Hancock -0.14
G Harris -0.14

Best TAS-W Player Combinations

Best TAS-W Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
L Lee BAT TAS-W
J Cavanough BOW TAS-W
T Saville BAT TAS-W
N Stalenberg BAT TAS-W
M Gibson BOW TAS-W
M Strano BOW TAS-W
H Graham AR TAS-W
E Manix-Geeves WK TAS-W
A Smith BAT TAS-W
N Carey AR TAS-W
E Villani BAT TAS-W
L Lee
J Cavanough
T Saville
N Stalenberg
M Gibson
M Strano
H Graham
E Manix-Geeves
A Smith
N Carey
E Villani
1
1 player
L Lee
2 player
L Lee
Strong Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
L Lee
2 player
J Cavanough
Weak Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
L Lee
2 player
T Saville
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
L Lee
2 player
N Stalenberg
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.2
1 player
L Lee
2 player
M Gibson
No Correlation
0
1 player
L Lee
2 player
M Strano
No Correlation
0.12
1 player
L Lee
2 player
H Graham
No Correlation
-0.2
1 player
L Lee
2 player
E Manix-Geeves
No Correlation
-0.38
1 player
L Lee
2 player
A Smith
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.28
1 player
L Lee
2 player
N Carey
Weak Negative Correlation
0.08
1 player
L Lee
2 player
E Villani
No Correlation
0.27
1 player
J Cavanough
2 player
L Lee
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
J Cavanough
2 player
J Cavanough
Strong Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
J Cavanough
2 player
T Saville
No Correlation
0.09
1 player
J Cavanough
2 player
N Stalenberg
No Correlation
-0.56
1 player
J Cavanough
2 player
M Gibson
Negative Correlation
-0.27
1 player
J Cavanough
2 player
M Strano
Weak Negative Correlation
0.67
1 player
J Cavanough
2 player
H Graham
Positive Correlation
-0.27
1 player
J Cavanough
2 player
E Manix-Geeves
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.67
1 player
J Cavanough
2 player
A Smith
Negative Correlation
-0.27
1 player
J Cavanough
2 player
N Carey
Weak Negative Correlation
0.45
1 player
J Cavanough
2 player
E Villani
Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
T Saville
2 player
L Lee
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
T Saville
2 player
J Cavanough
No Correlation
1
1 player
T Saville
2 player
T Saville
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.08
1 player
T Saville
2 player
N Stalenberg
No Correlation
-0.11
1 player
T Saville
2 player
M Gibson
No Correlation
0
1 player
T Saville
2 player
M Strano
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
T Saville
2 player
H Graham
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.54
1 player
T Saville
2 player
E Manix-Geeves
Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
T Saville
2 player
A Smith
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.38
1 player
T Saville
2 player
N Carey
Weak Negative Correlation
0.17
1 player
T Saville
2 player
E Villani
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
N Stalenberg
2 player
L Lee
Weak Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
N Stalenberg
2 player
J Cavanough
No Correlation
-0.08
1 player
N Stalenberg
2 player
T Saville
No Correlation
1
1 player
N Stalenberg
2 player
N Stalenberg
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
N Stalenberg
2 player
M Gibson
No Correlation
-0.41
1 player
N Stalenberg
2 player
M Strano
Negative Correlation
-0.1
1 player
N Stalenberg
2 player
H Graham
No Correlation
-0.13
1 player
N Stalenberg
2 player
E Manix-Geeves
No Correlation
-0.12
1 player
N Stalenberg
2 player
A Smith
No Correlation
-0.1
1 player
N Stalenberg
2 player
N Carey
No Correlation
-0.03
1 player
N Stalenberg
2 player
E Villani
No Correlation
-0.2
1 player
M Gibson
2 player
L Lee
No Correlation
-0.56
1 player
M Gibson
2 player
J Cavanough
Negative Correlation
-0.11
1 player
M Gibson
2 player
T Saville
No Correlation
0
1 player
M Gibson
2 player
N Stalenberg
No Correlation
1
1 player
M Gibson
2 player
M Gibson
Strong Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
M Gibson
2 player
M Strano
No Correlation
-0.27
1 player
M Gibson
2 player
H Graham
Weak Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
M Gibson
2 player
E Manix-Geeves
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
M Gibson
2 player
A Smith
Weak Negative Correlation
0.53
1 player
M Gibson
2 player
N Carey
Positive Correlation
-0.18
1 player
M Gibson
2 player
E Villani
No Correlation
0
1 player
M Strano
2 player
L Lee
No Correlation
-0.27
1 player
M Strano
2 player
J Cavanough
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
M Strano
2 player
T Saville
No Correlation
-0.41
1 player
M Strano
2 player
N Stalenberg
Negative Correlation
0.07
1 player
M Strano
2 player
M Gibson
No Correlation
1
1 player
M Strano
2 player
M Strano
Strong Positive Correlation
0.06
1 player
M Strano
2 player
H Graham
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
M Strano
2 player
E Manix-Geeves
Weak Negative Correlation
0.38
1 player
M Strano
2 player
A Smith
Weak Positive Correlation
0.46
1 player
M Strano
2 player
N Carey
Positive Correlation
-0.48
1 player
M Strano
2 player
E Villani
Negative Correlation
0.12
1 player
H Graham
2 player
L Lee
No Correlation
0.67
1 player
H Graham
2 player
J Cavanough
Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
H Graham
2 player
T Saville
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.1
1 player
H Graham
2 player
N Stalenberg
No Correlation
-0.27
1 player
H Graham
2 player
M Gibson
Weak Negative Correlation
0.06
1 player
H Graham
2 player
M Strano
No Correlation
1
1 player
H Graham
2 player
H Graham
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.2
1 player
H Graham
2 player
E Manix-Geeves
No Correlation
-0.11
1 player
H Graham
2 player
A Smith
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
H Graham
2 player
N Carey
Positive Correlation
0.05
1 player
H Graham
2 player
E Villani
No Correlation
-0.2
1 player
E Manix-Geeves
2 player
L Lee
No Correlation
-0.27
1 player
E Manix-Geeves
2 player
J Cavanough
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.54
1 player
E Manix-Geeves
2 player
T Saville
Negative Correlation
-0.13
1 player
E Manix-Geeves
2 player
N Stalenberg
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
E Manix-Geeves
2 player
M Gibson
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
E Manix-Geeves
2 player
M Strano
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.2
1 player
E Manix-Geeves
2 player
H Graham
No Correlation
1
1 player
E Manix-Geeves
2 player
E Manix-Geeves
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.5
1 player
E Manix-Geeves
2 player
A Smith
Negative Correlation
-0.03
1 player
E Manix-Geeves
2 player
N Carey
No Correlation
0.24
1 player
E Manix-Geeves
2 player
E Villani
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.38
1 player
A Smith
2 player
L Lee
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.67
1 player
A Smith
2 player
J Cavanough
Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
A Smith
2 player
T Saville
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.12
1 player
A Smith
2 player
N Stalenberg
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
A Smith
2 player
M Gibson
Weak Negative Correlation
0.38
1 player
A Smith
2 player
M Strano
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.11
1 player
A Smith
2 player
H Graham
No Correlation
-0.5
1 player
A Smith
2 player
E Manix-Geeves
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
A Smith
2 player
A Smith
Strong Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
A Smith
2 player
N Carey
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
A Smith
2 player
E Villani
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.28
1 player
N Carey
2 player
L Lee
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.27
1 player
N Carey
2 player
J Cavanough
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.38
1 player
N Carey
2 player
T Saville
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.1
1 player
N Carey
2 player
N Stalenberg
No Correlation
0.53
1 player
N Carey
2 player
M Gibson
Positive Correlation
0.46
1 player
N Carey
2 player
M Strano
Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
N Carey
2 player
H Graham
Positive Correlation
-0.03
1 player
N Carey
2 player
E Manix-Geeves
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
N Carey
2 player
A Smith
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
N Carey
2 player
N Carey
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.36
1 player
N Carey
2 player
E Villani
Weak Negative Correlation
0.08
1 player
E Villani
2 player
L Lee
No Correlation
0.45
1 player
E Villani
2 player
J Cavanough
Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
E Villani
2 player
T Saville
No Correlation
-0.03
1 player
E Villani
2 player
N Stalenberg
No Correlation
-0.18
1 player
E Villani
2 player
M Gibson
No Correlation
-0.48
1 player
E Villani
2 player
M Strano
Negative Correlation
0.05
1 player
E Villani
2 player
H Graham
No Correlation
0.24
1 player
E Villani
2 player
E Manix-Geeves
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
E Villani
2 player
A Smith
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.36
1 player
E Villani
2 player
N Carey
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
E Villani
2 player
E Villani
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick J Cavanough and H Graham together
Positive Correlation

Pick J Cavanough and A Smith together
Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 N Carey

AR
Similar Perfomance
M Gibson 0.53
M Strano 0.46
H Graham 0.4
A Smith 0.2
Opposite Perfomance
T Saville -0.38
E Villani -0.36
L Lee -0.28
J Cavanough -0.27
N Stalenberg -0.1
E Manix-Geeves -0.03

2 M Strano

BOW
Similar Perfomance
N Carey 0.46
A Smith 0.38
M Gibson 0.07
H Graham 0.06
Opposite Perfomance
E Villani -0.48
N Stalenberg -0.41
E Manix-Geeves -0.33
J Cavanough -0.27

3 H Graham

AR
Similar Perfomance
J Cavanough 0.67
N Carey 0.4
T Saville 0.25
L Lee 0.12
M Strano 0.06
E Villani 0.05
Opposite Perfomance
M Gibson -0.27
E Manix-Geeves -0.2
A Smith -0.11
N Stalenberg -0.1

4 E Manix-Geeves

WK
Similar Perfomance
M Gibson 0.33
E Villani 0.24
Opposite Perfomance
T Saville -0.54
A Smith -0.5
M Strano -0.33
J Cavanough -0.27
L Lee -0.2
H Graham -0.2
N Stalenberg -0.13
N Carey -0.03

5 E Villani

BAT
Similar Perfomance
J Cavanough 0.45
E Manix-Geeves 0.24
T Saville 0.17
L Lee 0.08
H Graham 0.05
Opposite Perfomance
M Strano -0.48
N Carey -0.36
A Smith -0.25
M Gibson -0.18
N Stalenberg -0.03

More on PL Labs

QUN-W vs TAS-W

PerfectLineup © 2025. All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer - PerfectLineup is an educational tool providing detailed analysis of sports players based on their past performances. We are not associated with any gaming activity and do not host any kind of paid or free contests or pool games. Our focus is purely on data-driven solutions to enhance our users' knowledge.

Perfect Lineup is not affiliated in any way to and claims no association, in any capacity whatsoever, with the Residents of the states of SIKKIM, ASSAM, ODISHA, TELANGANA, NAGALAND, ANDHRA PRADESH and where otherwise prohibited by law are not eligible to access Perfect Lineup.

This platform is applicable for users 18+ Only