SES vs WSS

This guide is super useful for identifying player combinations that are likely to score big. Use the filters to identify the best player combinations according to specific match scenarios.

Both players generally perform similarly when picked together. They either score high together or score low together. Maximise FPts by picking players that correlate positively with top players.

Both players generally perform in an opposite manner. If one player scores high, the other usually scores low. Avoid picking players that correlate negatively with top player

Show Player Combinations on the basis of:

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

K Moore AR SES

TC Coleman BOW SES

T Farrant AR SES

B Smith AR SES

A Cranstone BAT SES

A Davidson-Richards AR SES

P Scholfield BAT SES

P Franklin AR SES

D Gregory BOW SES

C Hill WK SES

R Macdonald-Gay BOW SES

K Moore

TC Coleman

T Farrant

B Smith

A Cranstone

A Davidson-Richards

P Scholfield

P Franklin

D Gregory

C Hill

R Macdonald-Gay

1

1 player

K Moore

2 player

K Moore

Strong Positive Correlation

0.31

1 player

K Moore

2 player

T Farrant

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.2

1 player

K Moore

2 player

B Smith

No Correlation

0.47

1 player

K Moore

2 player

A Cranstone

Positive Correlation

0.45

1 player

K Moore

2 player

A Davidson-Richards

Positive Correlation

0.13

1 player

K Moore

2 player

P Scholfield

No Correlation

-0.17

1 player

K Moore

2 player

P Franklin

No Correlation

0.05

1 player

K Moore

2 player

D Gregory

No Correlation

0.41

1 player

K Moore

2 player

C Hill

Positive Correlation

0.26

1 player

K Moore

2 player

R Macdonald-Gay

Weak Positive Correlation

0.31

1 player

T Farrant

2 player

K Moore

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

T Farrant

2 player

T Farrant

Strong Positive Correlation

0.02

1 player

T Farrant

2 player

B Smith

No Correlation

0.06

1 player

T Farrant

2 player

A Cranstone

No Correlation

0.26

1 player

T Farrant

2 player

A Davidson-Richards

Weak Positive Correlation

0.34

1 player

T Farrant

2 player

P Scholfield

Weak Positive Correlation

0.03

1 player

T Farrant

2 player

P Franklin

No Correlation

0.39

1 player

T Farrant

2 player

D Gregory

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.14

1 player

T Farrant

2 player

C Hill

No Correlation

0.3

1 player

T Farrant

2 player

R Macdonald-Gay

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.2

1 player

B Smith

2 player

K Moore

No Correlation

0.02

1 player

B Smith

2 player

T Farrant

No Correlation

1

1 player

B Smith

2 player

B Smith

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.15

1 player

B Smith

2 player

A Cranstone

No Correlation

0.25

1 player

B Smith

2 player

A Davidson-Richards

Weak Positive Correlation

0.2

1 player

B Smith

2 player

P Scholfield

Weak Positive Correlation

0.47

1 player

B Smith

2 player

P Franklin

Positive Correlation

0.16

1 player

B Smith

2 player

D Gregory

No Correlation

0.21

1 player

B Smith

2 player

C Hill

Weak Positive Correlation

0

1 player

B Smith

2 player

R Macdonald-Gay

No Correlation

0.47

1 player

A Cranstone

2 player

K Moore

Positive Correlation

0.06

1 player

A Cranstone

2 player

T Farrant

No Correlation

-0.15

1 player

A Cranstone

2 player

B Smith

No Correlation

1

1 player

A Cranstone

2 player

A Cranstone

Strong Positive Correlation

0.09

1 player

A Cranstone

2 player

A Davidson-Richards

No Correlation

0.03

1 player

A Cranstone

2 player

P Scholfield

No Correlation

0.21

1 player

A Cranstone

2 player

P Franklin

Weak Positive Correlation

0.05

1 player

A Cranstone

2 player

D Gregory

No Correlation

0.42

1 player

A Cranstone

2 player

C Hill

Positive Correlation

0.34

1 player

A Cranstone

2 player

R Macdonald-Gay

Weak Positive Correlation

0.45

1 player

A Davidson-Richards

2 player

K Moore

Positive Correlation

0.26

1 player

A Davidson-Richards

2 player

T Farrant

Weak Positive Correlation

0.25

1 player

A Davidson-Richards

2 player

B Smith

Weak Positive Correlation

0.09

1 player

A Davidson-Richards

2 player

A Cranstone

No Correlation

1

1 player

A Davidson-Richards

2 player

A Davidson-Richards

Strong Positive Correlation

0.22

1 player

A Davidson-Richards

2 player

P Scholfield

Weak Positive Correlation

0.28

1 player

A Davidson-Richards

2 player

P Franklin

Weak Positive Correlation

0.28

1 player

A Davidson-Richards

2 player

D Gregory

Weak Positive Correlation

0.6

1 player

A Davidson-Richards

2 player

C Hill

Positive Correlation

0.4

1 player

A Davidson-Richards

2 player

R Macdonald-Gay

Positive Correlation

0.13

1 player

P Scholfield

2 player

K Moore

No Correlation

0.34

1 player

P Scholfield

2 player

T Farrant

Weak Positive Correlation

0.2

1 player

P Scholfield

2 player

B Smith

Weak Positive Correlation

0.03

1 player

P Scholfield

2 player

A Cranstone

No Correlation

0.22

1 player

P Scholfield

2 player

A Davidson-Richards

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

P Scholfield

2 player

P Scholfield

Strong Positive Correlation

0.24

1 player

P Scholfield

2 player

P Franklin

Weak Positive Correlation

0.33

1 player

P Scholfield

2 player

D Gregory

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.05

1 player

P Scholfield

2 player

C Hill

No Correlation

0.42

1 player

P Scholfield

2 player

R Macdonald-Gay

Positive Correlation

-0.17

1 player

P Franklin

2 player

K Moore

No Correlation

0.03

1 player

P Franklin

2 player

T Farrant

No Correlation

0.47

1 player

P Franklin

2 player

B Smith

Positive Correlation

0.21

1 player

P Franklin

2 player

A Cranstone

Weak Positive Correlation

0.28

1 player

P Franklin

2 player

A Davidson-Richards

Weak Positive Correlation

0.24

1 player

P Franklin

2 player

P Scholfield

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

P Franklin

2 player

P Franklin

Strong Positive Correlation

0.33

1 player

P Franklin

2 player

D Gregory

Weak Positive Correlation

0.28

1 player

P Franklin

2 player

C Hill

Weak Positive Correlation

0.25

1 player

P Franklin

2 player

R Macdonald-Gay

Weak Positive Correlation

0.05

1 player

D Gregory

2 player

K Moore

No Correlation

0.39

1 player

D Gregory

2 player

T Farrant

Weak Positive Correlation

0.16

1 player

D Gregory

2 player

B Smith

No Correlation

0.05

1 player

D Gregory

2 player

A Cranstone

No Correlation

0.28

1 player

D Gregory

2 player

A Davidson-Richards

Weak Positive Correlation

0.33

1 player

D Gregory

2 player

P Scholfield

Weak Positive Correlation

0.33

1 player

D Gregory

2 player

P Franklin

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

D Gregory

2 player

D Gregory

Strong Positive Correlation

0.14

1 player

D Gregory

2 player

C Hill

No Correlation

0.32

1 player

D Gregory

2 player

R Macdonald-Gay

Weak Positive Correlation

0.41

1 player

C Hill

2 player

K Moore

Positive Correlation

-0.14

1 player

C Hill

2 player

T Farrant

No Correlation

0.21

1 player

C Hill

2 player

B Smith

Weak Positive Correlation

0.42

1 player

C Hill

2 player

A Cranstone

Positive Correlation

0.6

1 player

C Hill

2 player

A Davidson-Richards

Positive Correlation

-0.05

1 player

C Hill

2 player

P Scholfield

No Correlation

0.28

1 player

C Hill

2 player

P Franklin

Weak Positive Correlation

0.14

1 player

C Hill

2 player

D Gregory

No Correlation

1

1 player

C Hill

2 player

C Hill

Strong Positive Correlation

0.26

1 player

C Hill

2 player

R Macdonald-Gay

Weak Positive Correlation

0.26

1 player

R Macdonald-Gay

2 player

K Moore

Weak Positive Correlation

0.3

1 player

R Macdonald-Gay

2 player

T Farrant

Weak Positive Correlation

0

1 player

R Macdonald-Gay

2 player

B Smith

No Correlation

0.34

1 player

R Macdonald-Gay

2 player

A Cranstone

Weak Positive Correlation

0.4

1 player

R Macdonald-Gay

2 player

A Davidson-Richards

Positive Correlation

0.42

1 player

R Macdonald-Gay

2 player

P Scholfield

Positive Correlation

0.25

1 player

R Macdonald-Gay

2 player

P Franklin

Weak Positive Correlation

0.32

1 player

R Macdonald-Gay

2 player

D Gregory

Weak Positive Correlation

0.26

1 player

R Macdonald-Gay

2 player

C Hill

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

R Macdonald-Gay

2 player

R Macdonald-Gay

Strong Positive Correlation

Strong Positive Correlation

No Correlation

Strong Negative Correlation

Pick **A Davidson-Richards** and **C Hill** together

Positive Correlation

Similar Perfomance

P Franklin 0.47

A Davidson-Richards 0.25

C Hill 0.21

P Scholfield 0.2

D Gregory 0.16

T Farrant 0.02

Opposite Perfomance

K Moore -0.2

A Cranstone -0.15

Similar Perfomance

T Farrant 0.39

P Scholfield 0.33

P Franklin 0.33

R Macdonald-Gay 0.32

A Davidson-Richards 0.28

B Smith 0.16

C Hill 0.14

K Moore 0.05

A Cranstone 0.05

Similar Perfomance

B Smith 0.47

D Gregory 0.33

A Davidson-Richards 0.28

C Hill 0.28

R Macdonald-Gay 0.25

P Scholfield 0.24

A Cranstone 0.21

T Farrant 0.03

Opposite Perfomance

K Moore -0.17

Similar Perfomance

C Hill 0.6

K Moore 0.45

R Macdonald-Gay 0.4

P Franklin 0.28

D Gregory 0.28

T Farrant 0.26

B Smith 0.25

P Scholfield 0.22

A Cranstone 0.09

Opposite Perfomance

Similar Perfomance

R Macdonald-Gay 0.42

T Farrant 0.34

D Gregory 0.33

P Franklin 0.24

A Davidson-Richards 0.22

B Smith 0.2

K Moore 0.13

A Cranstone 0.03

Opposite Perfomance

C Hill -0.05

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

E Anderson BOW WSS

J Hazell BAT WSS

A Wellington AR WSS

S Luff BAT WSS

A Griffiths AR WSS

N Wraith WK WSS

E Corney BAT WSS

N Holland BAT WSS

I Wong BOW WSS

C Skelton BOW WSS

S Smale AR WSS

E Anderson

J Hazell

A Wellington

S Luff

A Griffiths

N Wraith

E Corney

N Holland

I Wong

C Skelton

S Smale

1

1 player

J Hazell

2 player

J Hazell

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.4

1 player

J Hazell

2 player

A Wellington

Weak Negative Correlation

1

1 player

J Hazell

2 player

S Luff

Strong Positive Correlation

0

1 player

J Hazell

2 player

A Griffiths

No Correlation

0.7

1 player

J Hazell

2 player

N Wraith

Positive Correlation

1

1 player

J Hazell

2 player

E Corney

Strong Positive Correlation

0.4

1 player

J Hazell

2 player

N Holland

Positive Correlation

-0.4

1 player

J Hazell

2 player

C Skelton

Weak Negative Correlation

0.7

1 player

J Hazell

2 player

S Smale

Positive Correlation

-0.4

1 player

A Wellington

2 player

J Hazell

Weak Negative Correlation

1

1 player

A Wellington

2 player

A Wellington

Strong Positive Correlation

0.23

1 player

A Wellington

2 player

S Luff

Weak Positive Correlation

0.3

1 player

A Wellington

2 player

A Griffiths

Weak Positive Correlation

0.21

1 player

A Wellington

2 player

N Wraith

Weak Positive Correlation

0.36

1 player

A Wellington

2 player

E Corney

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.25

1 player

A Wellington

2 player

N Holland

Weak Negative Correlation

0

1 player

A Wellington

2 player

C Skelton

No Correlation

0.44

1 player

A Wellington

2 player

S Smale

Positive Correlation

1

1 player

S Luff

2 player

J Hazell

Strong Positive Correlation

0.23

1 player

S Luff

2 player

A Wellington

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

S Luff

2 player

S Luff

Strong Positive Correlation

0.07

1 player

S Luff

2 player

A Griffiths

No Correlation

0.18

1 player

S Luff

2 player

N Wraith

No Correlation

0.57

1 player

S Luff

2 player

E Corney

Positive Correlation

0.34

1 player

S Luff

2 player

N Holland

Weak Positive Correlation

0.08

1 player

S Luff

2 player

C Skelton

No Correlation

0.42

1 player

S Luff

2 player

S Smale

Positive Correlation

0

1 player

A Griffiths

2 player

J Hazell

No Correlation

0.3

1 player

A Griffiths

2 player

A Wellington

Weak Positive Correlation

0.07

1 player

A Griffiths

2 player

S Luff

No Correlation

1

1 player

A Griffiths

2 player

A Griffiths

Strong Positive Correlation

0.39

1 player

A Griffiths

2 player

N Wraith

Weak Positive Correlation

0.4

1 player

A Griffiths

2 player

E Corney

Positive Correlation

0.36

1 player

A Griffiths

2 player

N Holland

Weak Positive Correlation

0.35

1 player

A Griffiths

2 player

C Skelton

Weak Positive Correlation

0.25

1 player

A Griffiths

2 player

S Smale

Weak Positive Correlation

0.7

1 player

N Wraith

2 player

J Hazell

Positive Correlation

0.21

1 player

N Wraith

2 player

A Wellington

Weak Positive Correlation

0.18

1 player

N Wraith

2 player

S Luff

No Correlation

0.39

1 player

N Wraith

2 player

A Griffiths

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

N Wraith

2 player

N Wraith

Strong Positive Correlation

0.47

1 player

N Wraith

2 player

E Corney

Positive Correlation

0.31

1 player

N Wraith

2 player

N Holland

Weak Positive Correlation

0.39

1 player

N Wraith

2 player

C Skelton

Weak Positive Correlation

0.24

1 player

N Wraith

2 player

S Smale

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

E Corney

2 player

J Hazell

Strong Positive Correlation

0.36

1 player

E Corney

2 player

A Wellington

Weak Positive Correlation

0.57

1 player

E Corney

2 player

S Luff

Positive Correlation

0.4

1 player

E Corney

2 player

A Griffiths

Positive Correlation

0.47

1 player

E Corney

2 player

N Wraith

Positive Correlation

1

1 player

E Corney

2 player

E Corney

Strong Positive Correlation

0.55

1 player

E Corney

2 player

N Holland

Positive Correlation

0.07

1 player

E Corney

2 player

C Skelton

No Correlation

0.37

1 player

E Corney

2 player

S Smale

Weak Positive Correlation

0.4

1 player

N Holland

2 player

J Hazell

Positive Correlation

-0.25

1 player

N Holland

2 player

A Wellington

Weak Negative Correlation

0.34

1 player

N Holland

2 player

S Luff

Weak Positive Correlation

0.36

1 player

N Holland

2 player

A Griffiths

Weak Positive Correlation

0.31

1 player

N Holland

2 player

N Wraith

Weak Positive Correlation

0.55

1 player

N Holland

2 player

E Corney

Positive Correlation

1

1 player

N Holland

2 player

N Holland

Strong Positive Correlation

0.22

1 player

N Holland

2 player

C Skelton

Weak Positive Correlation

0.25

1 player

N Holland

2 player

S Smale

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.4

1 player

C Skelton

2 player

J Hazell

Weak Negative Correlation

0

1 player

C Skelton

2 player

A Wellington

No Correlation

0.08

1 player

C Skelton

2 player

S Luff

No Correlation

0.35

1 player

C Skelton

2 player

A Griffiths

Weak Positive Correlation

0.39

1 player

C Skelton

2 player

N Wraith

Weak Positive Correlation

0.07

1 player

C Skelton

2 player

E Corney

No Correlation

0.22

1 player

C Skelton

2 player

N Holland

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

C Skelton

2 player

C Skelton

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.08

1 player

C Skelton

2 player

S Smale

No Correlation

0.7

1 player

S Smale

2 player

J Hazell

Positive Correlation

0.44

1 player

S Smale

2 player

A Wellington

Positive Correlation

0.42

1 player

S Smale

2 player

S Luff

Positive Correlation

0.25

1 player

S Smale

2 player

A Griffiths

Weak Positive Correlation

0.24

1 player

S Smale

2 player

N Wraith

Weak Positive Correlation

0.37

1 player

S Smale

2 player

E Corney

Weak Positive Correlation

0.25

1 player

S Smale

2 player

N Holland

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.08

1 player

S Smale

2 player

C Skelton

No Correlation

1

1 player

S Smale

2 player

S Smale

Strong Positive Correlation

Strong Positive Correlation

No Correlation

Strong Negative Correlation

Pick **E Anderson** and **N Holland** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **J Hazell** and **S Luff** together

Strong Positive Correlation

Pick **J Hazell** and **N Wraith** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **J Hazell** and **E Corney** together

Strong Positive Correlation

Pick **J Hazell** and **S Smale** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **I Wong** and **C Skelton** together

Positive Correlation

Similar Perfomance

J Hazell 1

E Corney 0.57

S Smale 0.42

N Holland 0.34

A Wellington 0.23

N Wraith 0.18

C Skelton 0.08

A Griffiths 0.07

Similar Perfomance

J Hazell 0.7

A Wellington 0.44

S Luff 0.42

E Corney 0.37

A Griffiths 0.25

N Holland 0.25

N Wraith 0.24

Opposite Perfomance

C Skelton -0.08

Similar Perfomance

E Corney 0.4

N Wraith 0.39

N Holland 0.36

C Skelton 0.35

A Wellington 0.3

S Smale 0.25

S Luff 0.07

Similar Perfomance

S Smale 0.44

E Corney 0.36

A Griffiths 0.3

S Luff 0.23

N Wraith 0.21

Opposite Perfomance

J Hazell -0.4

N Holland -0.25

Similar Perfomance

J Hazell 0.7

E Corney 0.47

A Griffiths 0.39

C Skelton 0.39

N Holland 0.31

S Smale 0.24

A Wellington 0.21

S Luff 0.18

Opposite Perfomance

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

K Moore AR SES

TC Coleman BOW SES

T Farrant AR SES

B Smith AR SES

A Cranstone BAT SES

A Davidson-Richards AR SES

P Scholfield BAT SES

P Franklin AR SES

D Gregory BOW SES

C Hill WK SES

R Macdonald-Gay BOW SES

K Moore

TC Coleman

T Farrant

B Smith

A Cranstone

A Davidson-Richards

P Scholfield

P Franklin

D Gregory

C Hill

R Macdonald-Gay

1

1 player

K Moore

2 player

K Moore

Strong Positive Correlation

0.25

1 player

K Moore

2 player

T Farrant

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.45

1 player

K Moore

2 player

B Smith

Negative Correlation

0.43

1 player

K Moore

2 player

A Cranstone

Positive Correlation

0.67

1 player

K Moore

2 player

A Davidson-Richards

Positive Correlation

0.11

1 player

K Moore

2 player

P Scholfield

No Correlation

-0.64

1 player

K Moore

2 player

P Franklin

Negative Correlation

-0.27

1 player

K Moore

2 player

D Gregory

Weak Negative Correlation

0.43

1 player

K Moore

2 player

C Hill

Positive Correlation

0.45

1 player

K Moore

2 player

R Macdonald-Gay

Positive Correlation

0.25

1 player

T Farrant

2 player

K Moore

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

T Farrant

2 player

T Farrant

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.38

1 player

T Farrant

2 player

B Smith

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.11

1 player

T Farrant

2 player

A Cranstone

No Correlation

0.5

1 player

T Farrant

2 player

A Davidson-Richards

Positive Correlation

-0.4

1 player

T Farrant

2 player

P Scholfield

Weak Negative Correlation

0

1 player

T Farrant

2 player

P Franklin

No Correlation

0.38

1 player

T Farrant

2 player

D Gregory

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.7

1 player

T Farrant

2 player

C Hill

Negative Correlation

0.56

1 player

T Farrant

2 player

R Macdonald-Gay

Positive Correlation

-0.45

1 player

B Smith

2 player

K Moore

Negative Correlation

-0.38

1 player

B Smith

2 player

T Farrant

Weak Negative Correlation

1

1 player

B Smith

2 player

B Smith

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.16

1 player

B Smith

2 player

A Cranstone

No Correlation

-0.05

1 player

B Smith

2 player

A Davidson-Richards

No Correlation

0

1 player

B Smith

2 player

P Scholfield

No Correlation

0.83

1 player

B Smith

2 player

P Franklin

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.12

1 player

B Smith

2 player

D Gregory

No Correlation

-0.11

1 player

B Smith

2 player

C Hill

No Correlation

-0.86

1 player

B Smith

2 player

R Macdonald-Gay

Strong Negative Correlation

0.43

1 player

A Cranstone

2 player

K Moore

Positive Correlation

-0.11

1 player

A Cranstone

2 player

T Farrant

No Correlation

-0.16

1 player

A Cranstone

2 player

B Smith

No Correlation

1

1 player

A Cranstone

2 player

A Cranstone

Strong Positive Correlation

0.07

1 player

A Cranstone

2 player

A Davidson-Richards

No Correlation

-0.5

1 player

A Cranstone

2 player

P Scholfield

Negative Correlation

-0.18

1 player

A Cranstone

2 player

P Franklin

No Correlation

-0.22

1 player

A Cranstone

2 player

D Gregory

Weak Negative Correlation

0.33

1 player

A Cranstone

2 player

C Hill

Weak Positive Correlation

0.4

1 player

A Cranstone

2 player

R Macdonald-Gay

Positive Correlation

0.67

1 player

A Davidson-Richards

2 player

K Moore

Positive Correlation

0.5

1 player

A Davidson-Richards

2 player

T Farrant

Positive Correlation

-0.05

1 player

A Davidson-Richards

2 player

B Smith

No Correlation

0.07

1 player

A Davidson-Richards

2 player

A Cranstone

No Correlation

1

1 player

A Davidson-Richards

2 player

A Davidson-Richards

Strong Positive Correlation

0

1 player

A Davidson-Richards

2 player

P Scholfield

No Correlation

-0.05

1 player

A Davidson-Richards

2 player

P Franklin

No Correlation

-0.1

1 player

A Davidson-Richards

2 player

D Gregory

No Correlation

0.14

1 player

A Davidson-Richards

2 player

C Hill

No Correlation

0.11

1 player

A Davidson-Richards

2 player

R Macdonald-Gay

No Correlation

0.11

1 player

P Scholfield

2 player

K Moore

No Correlation

-0.4

1 player

P Scholfield

2 player

T Farrant

Weak Negative Correlation

0

1 player

P Scholfield

2 player

B Smith

No Correlation

-0.5

1 player

P Scholfield

2 player

A Cranstone

Negative Correlation

0

1 player

P Scholfield

2 player

A Davidson-Richards

No Correlation

1

1 player

P Scholfield

2 player

P Scholfield

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.29

1 player

P Scholfield

2 player

P Franklin

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.29

1 player

P Scholfield

2 player

D Gregory

Weak Negative Correlation

0

1 player

P Scholfield

2 player

C Hill

No Correlation

0

1 player

P Scholfield

2 player

R Macdonald-Gay

No Correlation

-0.64

1 player

P Franklin

2 player

K Moore

Negative Correlation

0

1 player

P Franklin

2 player

T Farrant

No Correlation

0.83

1 player

P Franklin

2 player

B Smith

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.18

1 player

P Franklin

2 player

A Cranstone

No Correlation

-0.05

1 player

P Franklin

2 player

A Davidson-Richards

No Correlation

-0.29

1 player

P Franklin

2 player

P Scholfield

Weak Negative Correlation

1

1 player

P Franklin

2 player

P Franklin

Strong Positive Correlation

0.04

1 player

P Franklin

2 player

D Gregory

No Correlation

-0.25

1 player

P Franklin

2 player

C Hill

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.57

1 player

P Franklin

2 player

R Macdonald-Gay

Negative Correlation

-0.27

1 player

D Gregory

2 player

K Moore

Weak Negative Correlation

0.38

1 player

D Gregory

2 player

T Farrant

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.12

1 player

D Gregory

2 player

B Smith

No Correlation

-0.22

1 player

D Gregory

2 player

A Cranstone

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.1

1 player

D Gregory

2 player

A Davidson-Richards

No Correlation

-0.29

1 player

D Gregory

2 player

P Scholfield

Weak Negative Correlation

0.04

1 player

D Gregory

2 player

P Franklin

No Correlation

1

1 player

D Gregory

2 player

D Gregory

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.56

1 player

D Gregory

2 player

C Hill

Negative Correlation

-0.08

1 player

D Gregory

2 player

R Macdonald-Gay

No Correlation

0.43

1 player

C Hill

2 player

K Moore

Positive Correlation

-0.7

1 player

C Hill

2 player

T Farrant

Negative Correlation

-0.11

1 player

C Hill

2 player

B Smith

No Correlation

0.33

1 player

C Hill

2 player

A Cranstone

Weak Positive Correlation

0.14

1 player

C Hill

2 player

A Davidson-Richards

No Correlation

0

1 player

C Hill

2 player

P Scholfield

No Correlation

-0.25

1 player

C Hill

2 player

P Franklin

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.56

1 player

C Hill

2 player

D Gregory

Negative Correlation

1

1 player

C Hill

2 player

C Hill

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.14

1 player

C Hill

2 player

R Macdonald-Gay

No Correlation

0.45

1 player

R Macdonald-Gay

2 player

K Moore

Positive Correlation

0.56

1 player

R Macdonald-Gay

2 player

T Farrant

Positive Correlation

-0.86

1 player

R Macdonald-Gay

2 player

B Smith

Strong Negative Correlation

0.4

1 player

R Macdonald-Gay

2 player

A Cranstone

Positive Correlation

0.11

1 player

R Macdonald-Gay

2 player

A Davidson-Richards

No Correlation

0

1 player

R Macdonald-Gay

2 player

P Scholfield

No Correlation

-0.57

1 player

R Macdonald-Gay

2 player

P Franklin

Negative Correlation

-0.08

1 player

R Macdonald-Gay

2 player

D Gregory

No Correlation

-0.14

1 player

R Macdonald-Gay

2 player

C Hill

No Correlation

1

1 player

R Macdonald-Gay

2 player

R Macdonald-Gay

Strong Positive Correlation

Strong Positive Correlation

No Correlation

Strong Negative Correlation

Pick **K Moore** and **A Davidson-Richards** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **B Smith** and **P Franklin** together

Strong Positive Correlation

Pick **K Moore** and **P Franklin** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **T Farrant** and **C Hill** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **B Smith** and **R Macdonald-Gay** together

Strong Negative Correlation

Similar Perfomance

P Franklin 0.83

Opposite Perfomance

R Macdonald-Gay -0.86

K Moore -0.45

T Farrant -0.38

A Cranstone -0.16

D Gregory -0.12

C Hill -0.11

A Davidson-Richards -0.05

Similar Perfomance

B Smith 0.83

D Gregory 0.04

Opposite Perfomance

K Moore -0.64

R Macdonald-Gay -0.57

P Scholfield -0.29

C Hill -0.25

A Cranstone -0.18

A Davidson-Richards -0.05

Similar Perfomance

T Farrant 0.38

P Franklin 0.04

Opposite Perfomance

C Hill -0.56

P Scholfield -0.29

K Moore -0.27

A Cranstone -0.22

B Smith -0.12

A Davidson-Richards -0.1

R Macdonald-Gay -0.08

Similar Perfomance

K Moore 0.67

T Farrant 0.5

C Hill 0.14

R Macdonald-Gay 0.11

A Cranstone 0.07

Opposite Perfomance

D Gregory -0.1

B Smith -0.05

P Franklin -0.05

Similar Perfomance

K Moore 0.11

Opposite Perfomance

A Cranstone -0.5

T Farrant -0.4

P Franklin -0.29

D Gregory -0.29

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

E Anderson BOW WSS

J Hazell BAT WSS

A Wellington AR WSS

S Luff BAT WSS

A Griffiths AR WSS

N Wraith WK WSS

E Corney BAT WSS

N Holland BAT WSS

I Wong BOW WSS

C Skelton BOW WSS

S Smale AR WSS

E Anderson

J Hazell

A Wellington

S Luff

A Griffiths

N Wraith

E Corney

N Holland

I Wong

C Skelton

S Smale

1

1 player

J Hazell

2 player

J Hazell

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.7

1 player

J Hazell

2 player

A Wellington

Negative Correlation

0.7

1 player

J Hazell

2 player

S Luff

Positive Correlation

-0.7

1 player

J Hazell

2 player

A Griffiths

Negative Correlation

0.7

1 player

J Hazell

2 player

N Wraith

Positive Correlation

0.7

1 player

J Hazell

2 player

E Corney

Positive Correlation

0.7

1 player

J Hazell

2 player

N Holland

Positive Correlation

-0.7

1 player

J Hazell

2 player

C Skelton

Negative Correlation

0.7

1 player

J Hazell

2 player

S Smale

Positive Correlation

-0.7

1 player

A Wellington

2 player

J Hazell

Negative Correlation

1

1 player

A Wellington

2 player

A Wellington

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.14

1 player

A Wellington

2 player

S Luff

No Correlation

0.42

1 player

A Wellington

2 player

A Griffiths

Positive Correlation

0.71

1 player

A Wellington

2 player

N Wraith

Positive Correlation

0.42

1 player

A Wellington

2 player

E Corney

Positive Correlation

-0.7

1 player

A Wellington

2 player

N Holland

Negative Correlation

-0.14

1 player

A Wellington

2 player

C Skelton

No Correlation

0.14

1 player

A Wellington

2 player

S Smale

No Correlation

0.7

1 player

S Luff

2 player

J Hazell

Positive Correlation

-0.14

1 player

S Luff

2 player

A Wellington

No Correlation

1

1 player

S Luff

2 player

S Luff

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.57

1 player

S Luff

2 player

A Griffiths

Negative Correlation

-0.2

1 player

S Luff

2 player

N Wraith

No Correlation

0.33

1 player

S Luff

2 player

E Corney

Weak Positive Correlation

0

1 player

S Luff

2 player

N Holland

No Correlation

-0.08

1 player

S Luff

2 player

C Skelton

No Correlation

0

1 player

S Luff

2 player

S Smale

No Correlation

-0.7

1 player

A Griffiths

2 player

J Hazell

Negative Correlation

0.42

1 player

A Griffiths

2 player

A Wellington

Positive Correlation

-0.57

1 player

A Griffiths

2 player

S Luff

Negative Correlation

1

1 player

A Griffiths

2 player

A Griffiths

Strong Positive Correlation

0.13

1 player

A Griffiths

2 player

N Wraith

No Correlation

-0.14

1 player

A Griffiths

2 player

E Corney

No Correlation

0.08

1 player

A Griffiths

2 player

N Holland

No Correlation

-0.09

1 player

A Griffiths

2 player

C Skelton

No Correlation

0.25

1 player

A Griffiths

2 player

S Smale

Weak Positive Correlation

0.7

1 player

N Wraith

2 player

J Hazell

Positive Correlation

0.71

1 player

N Wraith

2 player

A Wellington

Positive Correlation

-0.2

1 player

N Wraith

2 player

S Luff

No Correlation

0.13

1 player

N Wraith

2 player

A Griffiths

No Correlation

1

1 player

N Wraith

2 player

N Wraith

Strong Positive Correlation

0.67

1 player

N Wraith

2 player

E Corney

Positive Correlation

0

1 player

N Wraith

2 player

N Holland

No Correlation

0.23

1 player

N Wraith

2 player

C Skelton

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.22

1 player

N Wraith

2 player

S Smale

Weak Negative Correlation

0.7

1 player

E Corney

2 player

J Hazell

Positive Correlation

0.42

1 player

E Corney

2 player

A Wellington

Positive Correlation

0.33

1 player

E Corney

2 player

S Luff

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.14

1 player

E Corney

2 player

A Griffiths

No Correlation

0.67

1 player

E Corney

2 player

N Wraith

Positive Correlation

1

1 player

E Corney

2 player

E Corney

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.35

1 player

E Corney

2 player

N Holland

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.67

1 player

E Corney

2 player

C Skelton

Negative Correlation

0.33

1 player

E Corney

2 player

S Smale

Weak Positive Correlation

0.7

1 player

N Holland

2 player

J Hazell

Positive Correlation

-0.7

1 player

N Holland

2 player

A Wellington

Negative Correlation

0

1 player

N Holland

2 player

S Luff

No Correlation

0.08

1 player

N Holland

2 player

A Griffiths

No Correlation

0

1 player

N Holland

2 player

N Wraith

No Correlation

-0.35

1 player

N Holland

2 player

E Corney

Weak Negative Correlation

1

1 player

N Holland

2 player

N Holland

Strong Positive Correlation

0.2

1 player

N Holland

2 player

C Skelton

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.38

1 player

N Holland

2 player

S Smale

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.7

1 player

C Skelton

2 player

J Hazell

Negative Correlation

-0.14

1 player

C Skelton

2 player

A Wellington

No Correlation

-0.08

1 player

C Skelton

2 player

S Luff

No Correlation

-0.09

1 player

C Skelton

2 player

A Griffiths

No Correlation

0.23

1 player

C Skelton

2 player

N Wraith

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.67

1 player

C Skelton

2 player

E Corney

Negative Correlation

0.2

1 player

C Skelton

2 player

N Holland

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

C Skelton

2 player

C Skelton

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.67

1 player

C Skelton

2 player

S Smale

Negative Correlation

0.7

1 player

S Smale

2 player

J Hazell

Positive Correlation

0.14

1 player

S Smale

2 player

A Wellington

No Correlation

0

1 player

S Smale

2 player

S Luff

No Correlation

0.25

1 player

S Smale

2 player

A Griffiths

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.22

1 player

S Smale

2 player

N Wraith

Weak Negative Correlation

0.33

1 player

S Smale

2 player

E Corney

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.38

1 player

S Smale

2 player

N Holland

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.67

1 player

S Smale

2 player

C Skelton

Negative Correlation

1

1 player

S Smale

2 player

S Smale

Strong Positive Correlation

Strong Positive Correlation

No Correlation

Strong Negative Correlation

Pick **J Hazell** and **N Holland** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **A Wellington** and **N Wraith** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **N Wraith** and **E Corney** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **J Hazell** and **A Wellington** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **J Hazell** and **A Griffiths** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **J Hazell** and **C Skelton** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **A Wellington** and **N Holland** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **S Luff** and **I Wong** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **E Corney** and **C Skelton** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **C Skelton** and **S Smale** together

Negative Correlation

Similar Perfomance

J Hazell 0.7

E Corney 0.33

Opposite Perfomance

A Griffiths -0.57

N Wraith -0.2

A Wellington -0.14

C Skelton -0.08

Similar Perfomance

J Hazell 0.7

E Corney 0.33

A Griffiths 0.25

A Wellington 0.14

Opposite Perfomance

C Skelton -0.67

N Holland -0.38

N Wraith -0.22

Similar Perfomance

A Wellington 0.71

J Hazell 0.7

E Corney 0.67

C Skelton 0.23

A Griffiths 0.13

Opposite Perfomance

S Smale -0.22

S Luff -0.2

Similar Perfomance

A Wellington 0.42

S Smale 0.25

N Wraith 0.13

N Holland 0.08

Opposite Perfomance

J Hazell -0.7

S Luff -0.57

E Corney -0.14

C Skelton -0.09

Similar Perfomance

N Wraith 0.23

N Holland 0.2

Opposite Perfomance

J Hazell -0.7

E Corney -0.67

S Smale -0.67

A Wellington -0.14

A Griffiths -0.09

S Luff -0.08