SES 27 May 07:00 pm WSS

Lineup Out

The Kent County Cricket Ground
Charlotte Edwards Cup

Best Player Combinations For
SES vs WSS

How it Works?

This guide is super useful for identifying player combinations that are likely to score big. Use the filters to identify the best player combinations according to specific match scenarios.

Player correlate positively

Both players generally perform similarly when picked together. They either score high together or score low together. Maximise FPts by picking players that correlate positively with top players.

Player correlate negatively

Both players generally perform in an opposite manner. If one player scores high, the other usually scores low. Avoid picking players that correlate negatively with top player

Show Player Combinations on the basis of:

Best SES Player Combinations

Best SES Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad
K Moore AR SES
TC Coleman BOW SES
T Farrant AR SES
B Smith AR SES
A Cranstone BAT SES
A Davidson-Richards AR SES
P Scholfield BAT SES
P Franklin AR SES
D Gregory BOW SES
C Hill WK SES
R Macdonald-Gay BOW SES
K Moore
TC Coleman
T Farrant
B Smith
A Cranstone
A Davidson-Richards
P Scholfield
P Franklin
D Gregory
C Hill
R Macdonald-Gay
1
1 player
K Moore
2 player
K Moore
Strong Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
K Moore
2 player
TC Coleman
No Correlation
0.31
1 player
K Moore
2 player
T Farrant
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.2
1 player
K Moore
2 player
B Smith
No Correlation
0.47
1 player
K Moore
2 player
A Cranstone
Positive Correlation
0.45
1 player
K Moore
2 player
A Davidson-Richards
Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
K Moore
2 player
P Scholfield
No Correlation
-0.17
1 player
K Moore
2 player
P Franklin
No Correlation
0.05
1 player
K Moore
2 player
D Gregory
No Correlation
0.41
1 player
K Moore
2 player
C Hill
Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
K Moore
2 player
R Macdonald-Gay
Weak Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
TC Coleman
2 player
K Moore
No Correlation
1
1 player
TC Coleman
2 player
TC Coleman
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
TC Coleman
2 player
T Farrant
No Correlation
0
1 player
TC Coleman
2 player
B Smith
No Correlation
-0.18
1 player
TC Coleman
2 player
A Cranstone
No Correlation
-0.18
1 player
TC Coleman
2 player
A Davidson-Richards
No Correlation
-0.04
1 player
TC Coleman
2 player
P Scholfield
No Correlation
-0.04
1 player
TC Coleman
2 player
P Franklin
No Correlation
0.06
1 player
TC Coleman
2 player
D Gregory
No Correlation
-0.08
1 player
TC Coleman
2 player
C Hill
No Correlation
0.39
1 player
TC Coleman
2 player
R Macdonald-Gay
Weak Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
T Farrant
2 player
K Moore
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
T Farrant
2 player
TC Coleman
No Correlation
1
1 player
T Farrant
2 player
T Farrant
Strong Positive Correlation
0.02
1 player
T Farrant
2 player
B Smith
No Correlation
0.06
1 player
T Farrant
2 player
A Cranstone
No Correlation
0.26
1 player
T Farrant
2 player
A Davidson-Richards
Weak Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
T Farrant
2 player
P Scholfield
Weak Positive Correlation
0.03
1 player
T Farrant
2 player
P Franklin
No Correlation
0.39
1 player
T Farrant
2 player
D Gregory
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
T Farrant
2 player
C Hill
No Correlation
0.3
1 player
T Farrant
2 player
R Macdonald-Gay
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.2
1 player
B Smith
2 player
K Moore
No Correlation
0
1 player
B Smith
2 player
TC Coleman
No Correlation
0.02
1 player
B Smith
2 player
T Farrant
No Correlation
1
1 player
B Smith
2 player
B Smith
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.15
1 player
B Smith
2 player
A Cranstone
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
B Smith
2 player
A Davidson-Richards
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
B Smith
2 player
P Scholfield
Weak Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
B Smith
2 player
P Franklin
Positive Correlation
0.16
1 player
B Smith
2 player
D Gregory
No Correlation
0.21
1 player
B Smith
2 player
C Hill
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
B Smith
2 player
R Macdonald-Gay
No Correlation
0.47
1 player
A Cranstone
2 player
K Moore
Positive Correlation
-0.18
1 player
A Cranstone
2 player
TC Coleman
No Correlation
0.06
1 player
A Cranstone
2 player
T Farrant
No Correlation
-0.15
1 player
A Cranstone
2 player
B Smith
No Correlation
1
1 player
A Cranstone
2 player
A Cranstone
Strong Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
A Cranstone
2 player
A Davidson-Richards
No Correlation
0.03
1 player
A Cranstone
2 player
P Scholfield
No Correlation
0.21
1 player
A Cranstone
2 player
P Franklin
Weak Positive Correlation
0.05
1 player
A Cranstone
2 player
D Gregory
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
A Cranstone
2 player
C Hill
Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
A Cranstone
2 player
R Macdonald-Gay
Weak Positive Correlation
0.45
1 player
A Davidson-Richards
2 player
K Moore
Positive Correlation
-0.18
1 player
A Davidson-Richards
2 player
TC Coleman
No Correlation
0.26
1 player
A Davidson-Richards
2 player
T Farrant
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
A Davidson-Richards
2 player
B Smith
Weak Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
A Davidson-Richards
2 player
A Cranstone
No Correlation
1
1 player
A Davidson-Richards
2 player
A Davidson-Richards
Strong Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
A Davidson-Richards
2 player
P Scholfield
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
A Davidson-Richards
2 player
P Franklin
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
A Davidson-Richards
2 player
D Gregory
Weak Positive Correlation
0.6
1 player
A Davidson-Richards
2 player
C Hill
Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
A Davidson-Richards
2 player
R Macdonald-Gay
Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
P Scholfield
2 player
K Moore
No Correlation
-0.04
1 player
P Scholfield
2 player
TC Coleman
No Correlation
0.34
1 player
P Scholfield
2 player
T Farrant
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
P Scholfield
2 player
B Smith
Weak Positive Correlation
0.03
1 player
P Scholfield
2 player
A Cranstone
No Correlation
0.22
1 player
P Scholfield
2 player
A Davidson-Richards
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
P Scholfield
2 player
P Scholfield
Strong Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
P Scholfield
2 player
P Franklin
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
P Scholfield
2 player
D Gregory
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.05
1 player
P Scholfield
2 player
C Hill
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
P Scholfield
2 player
R Macdonald-Gay
Positive Correlation
-0.17
1 player
P Franklin
2 player
K Moore
No Correlation
-0.04
1 player
P Franklin
2 player
TC Coleman
No Correlation
0.03
1 player
P Franklin
2 player
T Farrant
No Correlation
0.47
1 player
P Franklin
2 player
B Smith
Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
P Franklin
2 player
A Cranstone
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
P Franklin
2 player
A Davidson-Richards
Weak Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
P Franklin
2 player
P Scholfield
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
P Franklin
2 player
P Franklin
Strong Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
P Franklin
2 player
D Gregory
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
P Franklin
2 player
C Hill
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
P Franklin
2 player
R Macdonald-Gay
Weak Positive Correlation
0.05
1 player
D Gregory
2 player
K Moore
No Correlation
0.06
1 player
D Gregory
2 player
TC Coleman
No Correlation
0.39
1 player
D Gregory
2 player
T Farrant
Weak Positive Correlation
0.16
1 player
D Gregory
2 player
B Smith
No Correlation
0.05
1 player
D Gregory
2 player
A Cranstone
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
D Gregory
2 player
A Davidson-Richards
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
D Gregory
2 player
P Scholfield
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
D Gregory
2 player
P Franklin
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
D Gregory
2 player
D Gregory
Strong Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
D Gregory
2 player
C Hill
No Correlation
0.32
1 player
D Gregory
2 player
R Macdonald-Gay
Weak Positive Correlation
0.41
1 player
C Hill
2 player
K Moore
Positive Correlation
-0.08
1 player
C Hill
2 player
TC Coleman
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
C Hill
2 player
T Farrant
No Correlation
0.21
1 player
C Hill
2 player
B Smith
Weak Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
C Hill
2 player
A Cranstone
Positive Correlation
0.6
1 player
C Hill
2 player
A Davidson-Richards
Positive Correlation
-0.05
1 player
C Hill
2 player
P Scholfield
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
C Hill
2 player
P Franklin
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
C Hill
2 player
D Gregory
No Correlation
1
1 player
C Hill
2 player
C Hill
Strong Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
C Hill
2 player
R Macdonald-Gay
Weak Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
R Macdonald-Gay
2 player
K Moore
Weak Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
R Macdonald-Gay
2 player
TC Coleman
Weak Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
R Macdonald-Gay
2 player
T Farrant
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
R Macdonald-Gay
2 player
B Smith
No Correlation
0.34
1 player
R Macdonald-Gay
2 player
A Cranstone
Weak Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
R Macdonald-Gay
2 player
A Davidson-Richards
Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
R Macdonald-Gay
2 player
P Scholfield
Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
R Macdonald-Gay
2 player
P Franklin
Weak Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
R Macdonald-Gay
2 player
D Gregory
Weak Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
R Macdonald-Gay
2 player
C Hill
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
R Macdonald-Gay
2 player
R Macdonald-Gay
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick A Davidson-Richards and C Hill together
Positive Correlation

High Performing Players

1 B Smith

AR
Similar Perfomance
P Franklin 0.47
A Davidson-Richards 0.25
C Hill 0.21
P Scholfield 0.2
D Gregory 0.16
T Farrant 0.02
Opposite Perfomance
K Moore -0.2
A Cranstone -0.15

2 D Gregory

BOW
Similar Perfomance
T Farrant 0.39
P Scholfield 0.33
P Franklin 0.33
R Macdonald-Gay 0.32
A Davidson-Richards 0.28
B Smith 0.16
C Hill 0.14
TC Coleman 0.06
K Moore 0.05
A Cranstone 0.05

3 P Franklin

AR
Similar Perfomance
B Smith 0.47
D Gregory 0.33
A Davidson-Richards 0.28
C Hill 0.28
R Macdonald-Gay 0.25
P Scholfield 0.24
A Cranstone 0.21
T Farrant 0.03
Opposite Perfomance
K Moore -0.17
TC Coleman -0.04

4 A Davidson-Richards

AR
Similar Perfomance
C Hill 0.6
K Moore 0.45
R Macdonald-Gay 0.4
P Franklin 0.28
D Gregory 0.28
T Farrant 0.26
B Smith 0.25
P Scholfield 0.22
A Cranstone 0.09
Opposite Perfomance
TC Coleman -0.18

5 P Scholfield

BAT
Similar Perfomance
R Macdonald-Gay 0.42
T Farrant 0.34
D Gregory 0.33
P Franklin 0.24
A Davidson-Richards 0.22
B Smith 0.2
K Moore 0.13
A Cranstone 0.03
Opposite Perfomance
C Hill -0.05
TC Coleman -0.04

Best WSS Player Combinations

Best WSS Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad
E Anderson BOW WSS
J Hazell BAT WSS
A Wellington AR WSS
S Luff BAT WSS
A Griffiths AR WSS
N Wraith WK WSS
E Corney BAT WSS
N Holland BAT WSS
I Wong BOW WSS
C Skelton BOW WSS
S Smale AR WSS
E Anderson
J Hazell
A Wellington
S Luff
A Griffiths
N Wraith
E Corney
N Holland
I Wong
C Skelton
S Smale
1
1 player
E Anderson
2 player
E Anderson
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
E Anderson
2 player
J Hazell
No Correlation
-0.05
1 player
E Anderson
2 player
A Wellington
No Correlation
0.1
1 player
E Anderson
2 player
S Luff
No Correlation
0.26
1 player
E Anderson
2 player
A Griffiths
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.06
1 player
E Anderson
2 player
N Wraith
No Correlation
0
1 player
E Anderson
2 player
E Corney
No Correlation
0.6
1 player
E Anderson
2 player
N Holland
Positive Correlation
0.06
1 player
E Anderson
2 player
I Wong
No Correlation
-0.03
1 player
E Anderson
2 player
C Skelton
No Correlation
-0.01
1 player
E Anderson
2 player
S Smale
No Correlation
0
1 player
J Hazell
2 player
E Anderson
No Correlation
1
1 player
J Hazell
2 player
J Hazell
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.4
1 player
J Hazell
2 player
A Wellington
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
J Hazell
2 player
S Luff
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
J Hazell
2 player
A Griffiths
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
J Hazell
2 player
N Wraith
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
J Hazell
2 player
E Corney
Strong Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
J Hazell
2 player
N Holland
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
J Hazell
2 player
I Wong
No Correlation
-0.4
1 player
J Hazell
2 player
C Skelton
Weak Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
J Hazell
2 player
S Smale
Positive Correlation
-0.05
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
E Anderson
No Correlation
-0.4
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
J Hazell
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
A Wellington
Strong Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
S Luff
Weak Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
A Griffiths
Weak Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
N Wraith
Weak Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
E Corney
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
N Holland
Weak Negative Correlation
0.02
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
I Wong
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
C Skelton
No Correlation
0.44
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
S Smale
Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
S Luff
2 player
E Anderson
No Correlation
1
1 player
S Luff
2 player
J Hazell
Strong Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
S Luff
2 player
A Wellington
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
S Luff
2 player
S Luff
Strong Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
S Luff
2 player
A Griffiths
No Correlation
0.18
1 player
S Luff
2 player
N Wraith
No Correlation
0.57
1 player
S Luff
2 player
E Corney
Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
S Luff
2 player
N Holland
Weak Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
S Luff
2 player
I Wong
Weak Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
S Luff
2 player
C Skelton
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
S Luff
2 player
S Smale
Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
A Griffiths
2 player
E Anderson
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
A Griffiths
2 player
J Hazell
No Correlation
0.3
1 player
A Griffiths
2 player
A Wellington
Weak Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
A Griffiths
2 player
S Luff
No Correlation
1
1 player
A Griffiths
2 player
A Griffiths
Strong Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
A Griffiths
2 player
N Wraith
Weak Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
A Griffiths
2 player
E Corney
Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
A Griffiths
2 player
N Holland
Weak Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
A Griffiths
2 player
I Wong
Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
A Griffiths
2 player
C Skelton
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
A Griffiths
2 player
S Smale
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.06
1 player
N Wraith
2 player
E Anderson
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
N Wraith
2 player
J Hazell
Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
N Wraith
2 player
A Wellington
Weak Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
N Wraith
2 player
S Luff
No Correlation
0.39
1 player
N Wraith
2 player
A Griffiths
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
N Wraith
2 player
N Wraith
Strong Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
N Wraith
2 player
E Corney
Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
N Wraith
2 player
N Holland
Weak Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
N Wraith
2 player
I Wong
No Correlation
0.39
1 player
N Wraith
2 player
C Skelton
Weak Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
N Wraith
2 player
S Smale
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
E Corney
2 player
E Anderson
No Correlation
1
1 player
E Corney
2 player
J Hazell
Strong Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
E Corney
2 player
A Wellington
Weak Positive Correlation
0.57
1 player
E Corney
2 player
S Luff
Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
E Corney
2 player
A Griffiths
Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
E Corney
2 player
N Wraith
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
E Corney
2 player
E Corney
Strong Positive Correlation
0.55
1 player
E Corney
2 player
N Holland
Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
E Corney
2 player
I Wong
Weak Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
E Corney
2 player
C Skelton
No Correlation
0.37
1 player
E Corney
2 player
S Smale
Weak Positive Correlation
0.6
1 player
N Holland
2 player
E Anderson
Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
N Holland
2 player
J Hazell
Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
N Holland
2 player
A Wellington
Weak Negative Correlation
0.34
1 player
N Holland
2 player
S Luff
Weak Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
N Holland
2 player
A Griffiths
Weak Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
N Holland
2 player
N Wraith
Weak Positive Correlation
0.55
1 player
N Holland
2 player
E Corney
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
N Holland
2 player
N Holland
Strong Positive Correlation
0.37
1 player
N Holland
2 player
I Wong
Weak Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
N Holland
2 player
C Skelton
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
N Holland
2 player
S Smale
Weak Positive Correlation
0.06
1 player
I Wong
2 player
E Anderson
No Correlation
0
1 player
I Wong
2 player
J Hazell
No Correlation
0.02
1 player
I Wong
2 player
A Wellington
No Correlation
0.26
1 player
I Wong
2 player
S Luff
Weak Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
I Wong
2 player
A Griffiths
Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
I Wong
2 player
N Wraith
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
I Wong
2 player
E Corney
Weak Positive Correlation
0.37
1 player
I Wong
2 player
N Holland
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
I Wong
2 player
I Wong
Strong Positive Correlation
0.62
1 player
I Wong
2 player
C Skelton
Positive Correlation
-0.1
1 player
I Wong
2 player
S Smale
No Correlation
-0.03
1 player
C Skelton
2 player
E Anderson
No Correlation
-0.4
1 player
C Skelton
2 player
J Hazell
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
C Skelton
2 player
A Wellington
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
C Skelton
2 player
S Luff
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
C Skelton
2 player
A Griffiths
Weak Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
C Skelton
2 player
N Wraith
Weak Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
C Skelton
2 player
E Corney
No Correlation
0.22
1 player
C Skelton
2 player
N Holland
Weak Positive Correlation
0.62
1 player
C Skelton
2 player
I Wong
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
C Skelton
2 player
C Skelton
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.08
1 player
C Skelton
2 player
S Smale
No Correlation
-0.01
1 player
S Smale
2 player
E Anderson
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
S Smale
2 player
J Hazell
Positive Correlation
0.44
1 player
S Smale
2 player
A Wellington
Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
S Smale
2 player
S Luff
Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
S Smale
2 player
A Griffiths
Weak Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
S Smale
2 player
N Wraith
Weak Positive Correlation
0.37
1 player
S Smale
2 player
E Corney
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
S Smale
2 player
N Holland
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.1
1 player
S Smale
2 player
I Wong
No Correlation
-0.08
1 player
S Smale
2 player
C Skelton
No Correlation
1
1 player
S Smale
2 player
S Smale
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick E Anderson and N Holland together
Positive Correlation

Pick J Hazell and S Luff together
Strong Positive Correlation

Pick J Hazell and N Wraith together
Positive Correlation

Pick J Hazell and E Corney together
Strong Positive Correlation

Pick J Hazell and S Smale together
Positive Correlation

Pick I Wong and C Skelton together
Positive Correlation

High Performing Players

1 S Luff

BAT
Similar Perfomance
J Hazell 1
E Corney 0.57
S Smale 0.42
N Holland 0.34
I Wong 0.26
A Wellington 0.23
N Wraith 0.18
E Anderson 0.1
C Skelton 0.08
A Griffiths 0.07

2 S Smale

AR
Similar Perfomance
J Hazell 0.7
A Wellington 0.44
S Luff 0.42
E Corney 0.37
A Griffiths 0.25
N Holland 0.25
N Wraith 0.24
Opposite Perfomance
I Wong -0.1
C Skelton -0.08
E Anderson -0.01

3 A Griffiths

AR
Similar Perfomance
I Wong 0.4
E Corney 0.4
N Wraith 0.39
N Holland 0.36
C Skelton 0.35
A Wellington 0.3
E Anderson 0.26
S Smale 0.25
S Luff 0.07

4 A Wellington

AR
Similar Perfomance
S Smale 0.44
E Corney 0.36
A Griffiths 0.3
S Luff 0.23
N Wraith 0.21
I Wong 0.02
Opposite Perfomance
J Hazell -0.4
N Holland -0.25
E Anderson -0.05

5 N Wraith

WK
Similar Perfomance
J Hazell 0.7
E Corney 0.47
A Griffiths 0.39
C Skelton 0.39
N Holland 0.31
S Smale 0.24
A Wellington 0.21
S Luff 0.18
I Wong 0.1
Opposite Perfomance
E Anderson -0.06

Best SES Player Combinations

Best SES Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad
K Moore AR SES
TC Coleman BOW SES
T Farrant AR SES
B Smith AR SES
A Cranstone BAT SES
A Davidson-Richards AR SES
P Scholfield BAT SES
P Franklin AR SES
D Gregory BOW SES
C Hill WK SES
R Macdonald-Gay BOW SES
K Moore
TC Coleman
T Farrant
B Smith
A Cranstone
A Davidson-Richards
P Scholfield
P Franklin
D Gregory
C Hill
R Macdonald-Gay
1
1 player
K Moore
2 player
K Moore
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
K Moore
2 player
TC Coleman
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
K Moore
2 player
T Farrant
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.45
1 player
K Moore
2 player
B Smith
Negative Correlation
0.43
1 player
K Moore
2 player
A Cranstone
Positive Correlation
0.67
1 player
K Moore
2 player
A Davidson-Richards
Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
K Moore
2 player
P Scholfield
No Correlation
-0.64
1 player
K Moore
2 player
P Franklin
Negative Correlation
-0.27
1 player
K Moore
2 player
D Gregory
Weak Negative Correlation
0.43
1 player
K Moore
2 player
C Hill
Positive Correlation
0.45
1 player
K Moore
2 player
R Macdonald-Gay
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
TC Coleman
2 player
K Moore
No Correlation
1
1 player
TC Coleman
2 player
TC Coleman
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
TC Coleman
2 player
T Farrant
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
TC Coleman
2 player
B Smith
No Correlation
-0.42
1 player
TC Coleman
2 player
A Cranstone
Negative Correlation
-0.35
1 player
TC Coleman
2 player
A Davidson-Richards
Weak Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
TC Coleman
2 player
P Scholfield
No Correlation
-0.43
1 player
TC Coleman
2 player
P Franklin
Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
TC Coleman
2 player
D Gregory
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
TC Coleman
2 player
C Hill
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
TC Coleman
2 player
R Macdonald-Gay
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
T Farrant
2 player
K Moore
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
T Farrant
2 player
TC Coleman
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
T Farrant
2 player
T Farrant
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.38
1 player
T Farrant
2 player
B Smith
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.11
1 player
T Farrant
2 player
A Cranstone
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
T Farrant
2 player
A Davidson-Richards
Positive Correlation
-0.4
1 player
T Farrant
2 player
P Scholfield
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
T Farrant
2 player
P Franklin
No Correlation
0.38
1 player
T Farrant
2 player
D Gregory
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
T Farrant
2 player
C Hill
Negative Correlation
0.56
1 player
T Farrant
2 player
R Macdonald-Gay
Positive Correlation
-0.45
1 player
B Smith
2 player
K Moore
Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
B Smith
2 player
TC Coleman
No Correlation
-0.38
1 player
B Smith
2 player
T Farrant
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
B Smith
2 player
B Smith
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.16
1 player
B Smith
2 player
A Cranstone
No Correlation
-0.05
1 player
B Smith
2 player
A Davidson-Richards
No Correlation
0
1 player
B Smith
2 player
P Scholfield
No Correlation
0.83
1 player
B Smith
2 player
P Franklin
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.12
1 player
B Smith
2 player
D Gregory
No Correlation
-0.11
1 player
B Smith
2 player
C Hill
No Correlation
-0.86
1 player
B Smith
2 player
R Macdonald-Gay
Strong Negative Correlation
0.43
1 player
A Cranstone
2 player
K Moore
Positive Correlation
-0.42
1 player
A Cranstone
2 player
TC Coleman
Negative Correlation
-0.11
1 player
A Cranstone
2 player
T Farrant
No Correlation
-0.16
1 player
A Cranstone
2 player
B Smith
No Correlation
1
1 player
A Cranstone
2 player
A Cranstone
Strong Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
A Cranstone
2 player
A Davidson-Richards
No Correlation
-0.5
1 player
A Cranstone
2 player
P Scholfield
Negative Correlation
-0.18
1 player
A Cranstone
2 player
P Franklin
No Correlation
-0.22
1 player
A Cranstone
2 player
D Gregory
Weak Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
A Cranstone
2 player
C Hill
Weak Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
A Cranstone
2 player
R Macdonald-Gay
Positive Correlation
0.67
1 player
A Davidson-Richards
2 player
K Moore
Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
A Davidson-Richards
2 player
TC Coleman
Weak Negative Correlation
0.5
1 player
A Davidson-Richards
2 player
T Farrant
Positive Correlation
-0.05
1 player
A Davidson-Richards
2 player
B Smith
No Correlation
0.07
1 player
A Davidson-Richards
2 player
A Cranstone
No Correlation
1
1 player
A Davidson-Richards
2 player
A Davidson-Richards
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
A Davidson-Richards
2 player
P Scholfield
No Correlation
-0.05
1 player
A Davidson-Richards
2 player
P Franklin
No Correlation
-0.1
1 player
A Davidson-Richards
2 player
D Gregory
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
A Davidson-Richards
2 player
C Hill
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
A Davidson-Richards
2 player
R Macdonald-Gay
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
P Scholfield
2 player
K Moore
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
P Scholfield
2 player
TC Coleman
No Correlation
-0.4
1 player
P Scholfield
2 player
T Farrant
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
P Scholfield
2 player
B Smith
No Correlation
-0.5
1 player
P Scholfield
2 player
A Cranstone
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
P Scholfield
2 player
A Davidson-Richards
No Correlation
1
1 player
P Scholfield
2 player
P Scholfield
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.29
1 player
P Scholfield
2 player
P Franklin
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.29
1 player
P Scholfield
2 player
D Gregory
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
P Scholfield
2 player
C Hill
No Correlation
0
1 player
P Scholfield
2 player
R Macdonald-Gay
No Correlation
-0.64
1 player
P Franklin
2 player
K Moore
Negative Correlation
-0.43
1 player
P Franklin
2 player
TC Coleman
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
P Franklin
2 player
T Farrant
No Correlation
0.83
1 player
P Franklin
2 player
B Smith
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.18
1 player
P Franklin
2 player
A Cranstone
No Correlation
-0.05
1 player
P Franklin
2 player
A Davidson-Richards
No Correlation
-0.29
1 player
P Franklin
2 player
P Scholfield
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
P Franklin
2 player
P Franklin
Strong Positive Correlation
0.04
1 player
P Franklin
2 player
D Gregory
No Correlation
-0.25
1 player
P Franklin
2 player
C Hill
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.57
1 player
P Franklin
2 player
R Macdonald-Gay
Negative Correlation
-0.27
1 player
D Gregory
2 player
K Moore
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
D Gregory
2 player
TC Coleman
No Correlation
0.38
1 player
D Gregory
2 player
T Farrant
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.12
1 player
D Gregory
2 player
B Smith
No Correlation
-0.22
1 player
D Gregory
2 player
A Cranstone
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.1
1 player
D Gregory
2 player
A Davidson-Richards
No Correlation
-0.29
1 player
D Gregory
2 player
P Scholfield
Weak Negative Correlation
0.04
1 player
D Gregory
2 player
P Franklin
No Correlation
1
1 player
D Gregory
2 player
D Gregory
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.56
1 player
D Gregory
2 player
C Hill
Negative Correlation
-0.08
1 player
D Gregory
2 player
R Macdonald-Gay
No Correlation
0.43
1 player
C Hill
2 player
K Moore
Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
C Hill
2 player
TC Coleman
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
C Hill
2 player
T Farrant
Negative Correlation
-0.11
1 player
C Hill
2 player
B Smith
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
C Hill
2 player
A Cranstone
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
C Hill
2 player
A Davidson-Richards
No Correlation
0
1 player
C Hill
2 player
P Scholfield
No Correlation
-0.25
1 player
C Hill
2 player
P Franklin
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.56
1 player
C Hill
2 player
D Gregory
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
C Hill
2 player
C Hill
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
C Hill
2 player
R Macdonald-Gay
No Correlation
0.45
1 player
R Macdonald-Gay
2 player
K Moore
Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
R Macdonald-Gay
2 player
TC Coleman
No Correlation
0.56
1 player
R Macdonald-Gay
2 player
T Farrant
Positive Correlation
-0.86
1 player
R Macdonald-Gay
2 player
B Smith
Strong Negative Correlation
0.4
1 player
R Macdonald-Gay
2 player
A Cranstone
Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
R Macdonald-Gay
2 player
A Davidson-Richards
No Correlation
0
1 player
R Macdonald-Gay
2 player
P Scholfield
No Correlation
-0.57
1 player
R Macdonald-Gay
2 player
P Franklin
Negative Correlation
-0.08
1 player
R Macdonald-Gay
2 player
D Gregory
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
R Macdonald-Gay
2 player
C Hill
No Correlation
1
1 player
R Macdonald-Gay
2 player
R Macdonald-Gay
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick K Moore and A Davidson-Richards together
Positive Correlation

Pick B Smith and P Franklin together
Strong Positive Correlation

Pick K Moore and P Franklin together
Negative Correlation

Pick T Farrant and C Hill together
Negative Correlation

Pick B Smith and R Macdonald-Gay together
Strong Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 B Smith

AR
Similar Perfomance
P Franklin 0.83
Opposite Perfomance
R Macdonald-Gay -0.86
K Moore -0.45
T Farrant -0.38
A Cranstone -0.16
TC Coleman -0.14
D Gregory -0.12
C Hill -0.11
A Davidson-Richards -0.05

2 P Franklin

AR
Similar Perfomance
B Smith 0.83
D Gregory 0.04
Opposite Perfomance
K Moore -0.64
R Macdonald-Gay -0.57
TC Coleman -0.43
P Scholfield -0.29
C Hill -0.25
A Cranstone -0.18
A Davidson-Richards -0.05

3 D Gregory

BOW
Similar Perfomance
T Farrant 0.38
P Franklin 0.04
Opposite Perfomance
C Hill -0.56
P Scholfield -0.29
K Moore -0.27
A Cranstone -0.22
TC Coleman -0.14
B Smith -0.12
A Davidson-Richards -0.1
R Macdonald-Gay -0.08

4 A Davidson-Richards

AR
Similar Perfomance
K Moore 0.67
T Farrant 0.5
C Hill 0.14
R Macdonald-Gay 0.11
A Cranstone 0.07
Opposite Perfomance
TC Coleman -0.35
D Gregory -0.1
B Smith -0.05
P Franklin -0.05

5 P Scholfield

BAT
Similar Perfomance
TC Coleman 0.14
K Moore 0.11
Opposite Perfomance
A Cranstone -0.5
T Farrant -0.4
P Franklin -0.29
D Gregory -0.29

Best WSS Player Combinations

Best WSS Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad
E Anderson BOW WSS
J Hazell BAT WSS
A Wellington AR WSS
S Luff BAT WSS
A Griffiths AR WSS
N Wraith WK WSS
E Corney BAT WSS
N Holland BAT WSS
I Wong BOW WSS
C Skelton BOW WSS
S Smale AR WSS
E Anderson
J Hazell
A Wellington
S Luff
A Griffiths
N Wraith
E Corney
N Holland
I Wong
C Skelton
S Smale
1
1 player
E Anderson
2 player
E Anderson
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
E Anderson
2 player
J Hazell
No Correlation
-0.42
1 player
E Anderson
2 player
A Wellington
Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
E Anderson
2 player
S Luff
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
E Anderson
2 player
A Griffiths
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
E Anderson
2 player
N Wraith
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
E Anderson
2 player
E Corney
Weak Negative Correlation
0.35
1 player
E Anderson
2 player
N Holland
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
E Anderson
2 player
I Wong
No Correlation
0
1 player
E Anderson
2 player
C Skelton
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
E Anderson
2 player
S Smale
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
J Hazell
2 player
E Anderson
No Correlation
1
1 player
J Hazell
2 player
J Hazell
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
J Hazell
2 player
A Wellington
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
J Hazell
2 player
S Luff
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
J Hazell
2 player
A Griffiths
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
J Hazell
2 player
N Wraith
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
J Hazell
2 player
E Corney
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
J Hazell
2 player
N Holland
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
J Hazell
2 player
I Wong
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
J Hazell
2 player
C Skelton
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
J Hazell
2 player
S Smale
Positive Correlation
-0.42
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
E Anderson
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
J Hazell
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
A Wellington
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
S Luff
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
A Griffiths
Positive Correlation
0.71
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
N Wraith
Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
E Corney
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
N Holland
Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
I Wong
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
C Skelton
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
S Smale
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
S Luff
2 player
E Anderson
Weak Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
S Luff
2 player
J Hazell
Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
S Luff
2 player
A Wellington
No Correlation
1
1 player
S Luff
2 player
S Luff
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.57
1 player
S Luff
2 player
A Griffiths
Negative Correlation
-0.2
1 player
S Luff
2 player
N Wraith
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
S Luff
2 player
E Corney
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
S Luff
2 player
N Holland
No Correlation
-0.71
1 player
S Luff
2 player
I Wong
Negative Correlation
-0.08
1 player
S Luff
2 player
C Skelton
No Correlation
0
1 player
S Luff
2 player
S Smale
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
A Griffiths
2 player
E Anderson
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
A Griffiths
2 player
J Hazell
Negative Correlation
0.42
1 player
A Griffiths
2 player
A Wellington
Positive Correlation
-0.57
1 player
A Griffiths
2 player
S Luff
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
A Griffiths
2 player
A Griffiths
Strong Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
A Griffiths
2 player
N Wraith
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
A Griffiths
2 player
E Corney
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
A Griffiths
2 player
N Holland
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
A Griffiths
2 player
I Wong
No Correlation
-0.09
1 player
A Griffiths
2 player
C Skelton
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
A Griffiths
2 player
S Smale
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
N Wraith
2 player
E Anderson
Weak Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
N Wraith
2 player
J Hazell
Positive Correlation
0.71
1 player
N Wraith
2 player
A Wellington
Positive Correlation
-0.2
1 player
N Wraith
2 player
S Luff
No Correlation
0.13
1 player
N Wraith
2 player
A Griffiths
No Correlation
1
1 player
N Wraith
2 player
N Wraith
Strong Positive Correlation
0.67
1 player
N Wraith
2 player
E Corney
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
N Wraith
2 player
N Holland
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
N Wraith
2 player
I Wong
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
N Wraith
2 player
C Skelton
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.22
1 player
N Wraith
2 player
S Smale
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
E Corney
2 player
E Anderson
Weak Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
E Corney
2 player
J Hazell
Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
E Corney
2 player
A Wellington
Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
E Corney
2 player
S Luff
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
E Corney
2 player
A Griffiths
No Correlation
0.67
1 player
E Corney
2 player
N Wraith
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
E Corney
2 player
E Corney
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
E Corney
2 player
N Holland
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
E Corney
2 player
I Wong
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.67
1 player
E Corney
2 player
C Skelton
Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
E Corney
2 player
S Smale
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
N Holland
2 player
E Anderson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
N Holland
2 player
J Hazell
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
N Holland
2 player
A Wellington
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
N Holland
2 player
S Luff
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
N Holland
2 player
A Griffiths
No Correlation
0
1 player
N Holland
2 player
N Wraith
No Correlation
-0.35
1 player
N Holland
2 player
E Corney
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
N Holland
2 player
N Holland
Strong Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
N Holland
2 player
I Wong
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
N Holland
2 player
C Skelton
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.38
1 player
N Holland
2 player
S Smale
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
I Wong
2 player
E Anderson
No Correlation
0
1 player
I Wong
2 player
J Hazell
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
I Wong
2 player
A Wellington
No Correlation
-0.71
1 player
I Wong
2 player
S Luff
Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
I Wong
2 player
A Griffiths
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
I Wong
2 player
N Wraith
No Correlation
-0.23
1 player
I Wong
2 player
E Corney
Weak Negative Correlation
0.23
1 player
I Wong
2 player
N Holland
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
I Wong
2 player
I Wong
Strong Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
I Wong
2 player
C Skelton
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
I Wong
2 player
S Smale
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
C Skelton
2 player
E Anderson
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
C Skelton
2 player
J Hazell
Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
C Skelton
2 player
A Wellington
No Correlation
-0.08
1 player
C Skelton
2 player
S Luff
No Correlation
-0.09
1 player
C Skelton
2 player
A Griffiths
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
C Skelton
2 player
N Wraith
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.67
1 player
C Skelton
2 player
E Corney
Negative Correlation
0.2
1 player
C Skelton
2 player
N Holland
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
C Skelton
2 player
I Wong
No Correlation
1
1 player
C Skelton
2 player
C Skelton
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.67
1 player
C Skelton
2 player
S Smale
Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
S Smale
2 player
E Anderson
Weak Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
S Smale
2 player
J Hazell
Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
S Smale
2 player
A Wellington
No Correlation
0
1 player
S Smale
2 player
S Luff
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
S Smale
2 player
A Griffiths
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.22
1 player
S Smale
2 player
N Wraith
Weak Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
S Smale
2 player
E Corney
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.38
1 player
S Smale
2 player
N Holland
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
S Smale
2 player
I Wong
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.67
1 player
S Smale
2 player
C Skelton
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
S Smale
2 player
S Smale
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick J Hazell and N Holland together
Positive Correlation

Pick A Wellington and N Wraith together
Positive Correlation

Pick N Wraith and E Corney together
Positive Correlation

Pick J Hazell and A Wellington together
Negative Correlation

Pick J Hazell and A Griffiths together
Negative Correlation

Pick J Hazell and C Skelton together
Negative Correlation

Pick A Wellington and N Holland together
Negative Correlation

Pick S Luff and I Wong together
Negative Correlation

Pick E Corney and C Skelton together
Negative Correlation

Pick C Skelton and S Smale together
Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 S Luff

BAT
Similar Perfomance
J Hazell 0.7
E Corney 0.33
Opposite Perfomance
I Wong -0.71
A Griffiths -0.57
E Anderson -0.33
N Wraith -0.2
A Wellington -0.14
C Skelton -0.08

2 S Smale

AR
Similar Perfomance
J Hazell 0.7
E Corney 0.33
A Griffiths 0.25
A Wellington 0.14
Opposite Perfomance
C Skelton -0.67
N Holland -0.38
E Anderson -0.33
I Wong -0.33
N Wraith -0.22

3 N Wraith

WK
Similar Perfomance
A Wellington 0.71
J Hazell 0.7
E Corney 0.67
C Skelton 0.23
A Griffiths 0.13
Opposite Perfomance
E Anderson -0.33
S Smale -0.22
S Luff -0.2
I Wong -0.14

4 A Griffiths

AR
Similar Perfomance
A Wellington 0.42
S Smale 0.25
I Wong 0.14
N Wraith 0.13
N Holland 0.08
Opposite Perfomance
J Hazell -0.7
S Luff -0.57
E Anderson -0.14
E Corney -0.14
C Skelton -0.09

5 C Skelton

BOW
Similar Perfomance
N Wraith 0.23
N Holland 0.2
I Wong 0.14
Opposite Perfomance
J Hazell -0.7
E Corney -0.67
S Smale -0.67
A Wellington -0.14
A Griffiths -0.09
S Luff -0.08

PerfectLineup © 2024. All Rights Reserved