SK vs WEW

This guide is super useful for identifying player combinations that are likely to score big. Use the filters to identify the best player combinations according to specific match scenarios.

Both players generally perform similarly when picked together. They either score high together or score low together. Maximise FPts by picking players that correlate positively with top players.

Both players generally perform in an opposite manner. If one player scores high, the other usually scores low. Avoid picking players that correlate negatively with top player

Show Player Combinations on the basis of:

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

E Cunningham AR SK

C Olivier AR SK

R Henry BOW SK

A Hanekom BAT SK

R Rhode BOW SK

T Cornelissen AR SK

L Smit BAT SK

R De Bruin BAT SK

M de-Vries WK SK

W Brand WK SK

A Gqamane BOW SK

E Cunningham

C Olivier

R Henry

A Hanekom

R Rhode

T Cornelissen

L Smit

R De Bruin

M de-Vries

W Brand

A Gqamane

1

1 player

E Cunningham

2 player

E Cunningham

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.06

1 player

E Cunningham

2 player

C Olivier

No Correlation

0.26

1 player

E Cunningham

2 player

R Henry

Weak Positive Correlation

0.47

1 player

E Cunningham

2 player

A Hanekom

Positive Correlation

-0.04

1 player

E Cunningham

2 player

R Rhode

No Correlation

0.27

1 player

E Cunningham

2 player

T Cornelissen

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.03

1 player

E Cunningham

2 player

L Smit

No Correlation

0.17

1 player

E Cunningham

2 player

M de-Vries

No Correlation

0.5

1 player

E Cunningham

2 player

W Brand

Positive Correlation

0.49

1 player

E Cunningham

2 player

A Gqamane

Positive Correlation

-0.06

1 player

C Olivier

2 player

E Cunningham

No Correlation

1

1 player

C Olivier

2 player

C Olivier

Strong Positive Correlation

0.22

1 player

C Olivier

2 player

R Henry

Weak Positive Correlation

0.31

1 player

C Olivier

2 player

A Hanekom

Weak Positive Correlation

0.32

1 player

C Olivier

2 player

R Rhode

Weak Positive Correlation

0.31

1 player

C Olivier

2 player

T Cornelissen

Weak Positive Correlation

0.28

1 player

C Olivier

2 player

L Smit

Weak Positive Correlation

0.23

1 player

C Olivier

2 player

M de-Vries

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.13

1 player

C Olivier

2 player

W Brand

No Correlation

0.24

1 player

C Olivier

2 player

A Gqamane

Weak Positive Correlation

0.26

1 player

R Henry

2 player

E Cunningham

Weak Positive Correlation

0.22

1 player

R Henry

2 player

C Olivier

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

R Henry

2 player

R Henry

Strong Positive Correlation

0.51

1 player

R Henry

2 player

A Hanekom

Positive Correlation

0.23

1 player

R Henry

2 player

R Rhode

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.09

1 player

R Henry

2 player

T Cornelissen

No Correlation

0.6

1 player

R Henry

2 player

L Smit

Positive Correlation

0.29

1 player

R Henry

2 player

M de-Vries

Weak Positive Correlation

0.47

1 player

R Henry

2 player

W Brand

Positive Correlation

0.49

1 player

R Henry

2 player

A Gqamane

Positive Correlation

0.47

1 player

A Hanekom

2 player

E Cunningham

Positive Correlation

0.31

1 player

A Hanekom

2 player

C Olivier

Weak Positive Correlation

0.51

1 player

A Hanekom

2 player

R Henry

Positive Correlation

1

1 player

A Hanekom

2 player

A Hanekom

Strong Positive Correlation

0.28

1 player

A Hanekom

2 player

R Rhode

Weak Positive Correlation

0.1

1 player

A Hanekom

2 player

T Cornelissen

No Correlation

-0.07

1 player

A Hanekom

2 player

L Smit

No Correlation

0.26

1 player

A Hanekom

2 player

M de-Vries

Weak Positive Correlation

0.36

1 player

A Hanekom

2 player

W Brand

Weak Positive Correlation

0.65

1 player

A Hanekom

2 player

A Gqamane

Positive Correlation

-0.04

1 player

R Rhode

2 player

E Cunningham

No Correlation

0.32

1 player

R Rhode

2 player

C Olivier

Weak Positive Correlation

0.23

1 player

R Rhode

2 player

R Henry

Weak Positive Correlation

0.28

1 player

R Rhode

2 player

A Hanekom

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

R Rhode

2 player

R Rhode

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.01

1 player

R Rhode

2 player

T Cornelissen

No Correlation

-0.22

1 player

R Rhode

2 player

L Smit

Weak Negative Correlation

0.29

1 player

R Rhode

2 player

M de-Vries

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.09

1 player

R Rhode

2 player

W Brand

No Correlation

0.39

1 player

R Rhode

2 player

A Gqamane

Weak Positive Correlation

0.27

1 player

T Cornelissen

2 player

E Cunningham

Weak Positive Correlation

0.31

1 player

T Cornelissen

2 player

C Olivier

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.09

1 player

T Cornelissen

2 player

R Henry

No Correlation

0.1

1 player

T Cornelissen

2 player

A Hanekom

No Correlation

-0.01

1 player

T Cornelissen

2 player

R Rhode

No Correlation

1

1 player

T Cornelissen

2 player

T Cornelissen

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.27

1 player

T Cornelissen

2 player

L Smit

Weak Negative Correlation

0.28

1 player

T Cornelissen

2 player

M de-Vries

Weak Positive Correlation

0.21

1 player

T Cornelissen

2 player

W Brand

Weak Positive Correlation

0.26

1 player

T Cornelissen

2 player

A Gqamane

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.03

1 player

L Smit

2 player

E Cunningham

No Correlation

0.28

1 player

L Smit

2 player

C Olivier

Weak Positive Correlation

0.6

1 player

L Smit

2 player

R Henry

Positive Correlation

-0.07

1 player

L Smit

2 player

A Hanekom

No Correlation

-0.22

1 player

L Smit

2 player

R Rhode

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.27

1 player

L Smit

2 player

T Cornelissen

Weak Negative Correlation

1

1 player

L Smit

2 player

L Smit

Strong Positive Correlation

0.7

1 player

L Smit

2 player

M de-Vries

Positive Correlation

0.35

1 player

L Smit

2 player

W Brand

Weak Positive Correlation

0

1 player

L Smit

2 player

A Gqamane

No Correlation

0.17

1 player

M de-Vries

2 player

E Cunningham

No Correlation

0.23

1 player

M de-Vries

2 player

C Olivier

Weak Positive Correlation

0.29

1 player

M de-Vries

2 player

R Henry

Weak Positive Correlation

0.26

1 player

M de-Vries

2 player

A Hanekom

Weak Positive Correlation

0.29

1 player

M de-Vries

2 player

R Rhode

Weak Positive Correlation

0.28

1 player

M de-Vries

2 player

T Cornelissen

Weak Positive Correlation

0.7

1 player

M de-Vries

2 player

L Smit

Positive Correlation

1

1 player

M de-Vries

2 player

M de-Vries

Strong Positive Correlation

0.31

1 player

M de-Vries

2 player

W Brand

Weak Positive Correlation

0.31

1 player

M de-Vries

2 player

A Gqamane

Weak Positive Correlation

0.5

1 player

W Brand

2 player

E Cunningham

Positive Correlation

-0.13

1 player

W Brand

2 player

C Olivier

No Correlation

0.47

1 player

W Brand

2 player

R Henry

Positive Correlation

0.36

1 player

W Brand

2 player

A Hanekom

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.09

1 player

W Brand

2 player

R Rhode

No Correlation

0.21

1 player

W Brand

2 player

T Cornelissen

Weak Positive Correlation

0.35

1 player

W Brand

2 player

L Smit

Weak Positive Correlation

0.31

1 player

W Brand

2 player

M de-Vries

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

W Brand

2 player

W Brand

Strong Positive Correlation

0.54

1 player

W Brand

2 player

A Gqamane

Positive Correlation

0.49

1 player

A Gqamane

2 player

E Cunningham

Positive Correlation

0.24

1 player

A Gqamane

2 player

C Olivier

Weak Positive Correlation

0.49

1 player

A Gqamane

2 player

R Henry

Positive Correlation

0.65

1 player

A Gqamane

2 player

A Hanekom

Positive Correlation

0.39

1 player

A Gqamane

2 player

R Rhode

Weak Positive Correlation

0.26

1 player

A Gqamane

2 player

T Cornelissen

Weak Positive Correlation

0

1 player

A Gqamane

2 player

L Smit

No Correlation

0.31

1 player

A Gqamane

2 player

M de-Vries

Weak Positive Correlation

0.54

1 player

A Gqamane

2 player

W Brand

Positive Correlation

1

1 player

A Gqamane

2 player

A Gqamane

Strong Positive Correlation

Strong Positive Correlation

No Correlation

Strong Negative Correlation

Pick **R Henry** and **L Smit** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **A Hanekom** and **A Gqamane** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **L Smit** and **M de-Vries** together

Positive Correlation

Similar Perfomance

W Brand 0.5

A Gqamane 0.49

A Hanekom 0.47

T Cornelissen 0.27

R Henry 0.26

M de-Vries 0.17

Opposite Perfomance

C Olivier -0.06

R Rhode -0.04

L Smit -0.03

Similar Perfomance

A Hanekom 0.65

W Brand 0.54

E Cunningham 0.49

R Henry 0.49

R Rhode 0.39

M de-Vries 0.31

T Cornelissen 0.26

C Olivier 0.24

Similar Perfomance

A Gqamane 0.39

C Olivier 0.32

M de-Vries 0.29

A Hanekom 0.28

R Henry 0.23

Opposite Perfomance

L Smit -0.22

W Brand -0.09

E Cunningham -0.04

T Cornelissen -0.01

Similar Perfomance

A Gqamane 0.65

R Henry 0.51

E Cunningham 0.47

W Brand 0.36

C Olivier 0.31

R Rhode 0.28

M de-Vries 0.26

T Cornelissen 0.1

Opposite Perfomance

L Smit -0.07

Similar Perfomance

L Smit 0.6

A Hanekom 0.51

A Gqamane 0.49

W Brand 0.47

M de-Vries 0.29

E Cunningham 0.26

R Rhode 0.23

C Olivier 0.22

Opposite Perfomance

T Cornelissen -0.09

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

J Cassiem WK WEW

K Dreyden BOW WEW

S Wolmarans BOW WEW

C Ayford BAT WEW

M Dumpies BOW WEW

J Adams AR WEW

R Louw BAT WEW

R Robertson WK WEW

R du Plooy AR WEW

S Mahima AR WEW

M Copeland BAT WEW

J Cassiem

K Dreyden

S Wolmarans

C Ayford

M Dumpies

J Adams

R Louw

R Robertson

R du Plooy

S Mahima

M Copeland

1

1 player

J Cassiem

2 player

J Cassiem

Strong Positive Correlation

0.34

1 player

J Cassiem

2 player

K Dreyden

Weak Positive Correlation

0.3

1 player

J Cassiem

2 player

S Wolmarans

Weak Positive Correlation

0.66

1 player

J Cassiem

2 player

C Ayford

Positive Correlation

0.22

1 player

J Cassiem

2 player

M Dumpies

Weak Positive Correlation

0.31

1 player

J Cassiem

2 player

J Adams

Weak Positive Correlation

0.07

1 player

J Cassiem

2 player

R Louw

No Correlation

0.64

1 player

J Cassiem

2 player

R Robertson

Positive Correlation

0.85

1 player

J Cassiem

2 player

R du Plooy

Strong Positive Correlation

0.34

1 player

K Dreyden

2 player

J Cassiem

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

K Dreyden

2 player

K Dreyden

Strong Positive Correlation

0.42

1 player

K Dreyden

2 player

S Wolmarans

Positive Correlation

0.57

1 player

K Dreyden

2 player

C Ayford

Positive Correlation

0.3

1 player

K Dreyden

2 player

M Dumpies

Weak Positive Correlation

0.3

1 player

K Dreyden

2 player

J Adams

Weak Positive Correlation

0.3

1 player

K Dreyden

2 player

R Louw

Weak Positive Correlation

0.15

1 player

K Dreyden

2 player

R Robertson

No Correlation

0.3

1 player

K Dreyden

2 player

R du Plooy

Weak Positive Correlation

0.3

1 player

S Wolmarans

2 player

J Cassiem

Weak Positive Correlation

0.42

1 player

S Wolmarans

2 player

K Dreyden

Positive Correlation

1

1 player

S Wolmarans

2 player

S Wolmarans

Strong Positive Correlation

0.42

1 player

S Wolmarans

2 player

C Ayford

Positive Correlation

0.28

1 player

S Wolmarans

2 player

M Dumpies

Weak Positive Correlation

0.22

1 player

S Wolmarans

2 player

J Adams

Weak Positive Correlation

0.36

1 player

S Wolmarans

2 player

R Louw

Weak Positive Correlation

0

1 player

S Wolmarans

2 player

R Robertson

No Correlation

0.85

1 player

S Wolmarans

2 player

R du Plooy

Strong Positive Correlation

0.66

1 player

C Ayford

2 player

J Cassiem

Positive Correlation

0.57

1 player

C Ayford

2 player

K Dreyden

Positive Correlation

0.42

1 player

C Ayford

2 player

S Wolmarans

Positive Correlation

1

1 player

C Ayford

2 player

C Ayford

Strong Positive Correlation

0.44

1 player

C Ayford

2 player

M Dumpies

Positive Correlation

0.38

1 player

C Ayford

2 player

J Adams

Weak Positive Correlation

0.05

1 player

C Ayford

2 player

R Louw

No Correlation

1

1 player

C Ayford

2 player

R Robertson

Strong Positive Correlation

1

1 player

C Ayford

2 player

R du Plooy

Strong Positive Correlation

0.22

1 player

M Dumpies

2 player

J Cassiem

Weak Positive Correlation

0.3

1 player

M Dumpies

2 player

K Dreyden

Weak Positive Correlation

0.28

1 player

M Dumpies

2 player

S Wolmarans

Weak Positive Correlation

0.44

1 player

M Dumpies

2 player

C Ayford

Positive Correlation

1

1 player

M Dumpies

2 player

M Dumpies

Strong Positive Correlation

0.11

1 player

M Dumpies

2 player

J Adams

No Correlation

0.51

1 player

M Dumpies

2 player

R Louw

Positive Correlation

0.1

1 player

M Dumpies

2 player

R Robertson

No Correlation

0.7

1 player

M Dumpies

2 player

R du Plooy

Positive Correlation

0.31

1 player

J Adams

2 player

J Cassiem

Weak Positive Correlation

0.3

1 player

J Adams

2 player

K Dreyden

Weak Positive Correlation

0.22

1 player

J Adams

2 player

S Wolmarans

Weak Positive Correlation

0.38

1 player

J Adams

2 player

C Ayford

Weak Positive Correlation

0.11

1 player

J Adams

2 player

M Dumpies

No Correlation

1

1 player

J Adams

2 player

J Adams

Strong Positive Correlation

0.46

1 player

J Adams

2 player

R Louw

Positive Correlation

0.12

1 player

J Adams

2 player

R Robertson

No Correlation

1

1 player

J Adams

2 player

R du Plooy

Strong Positive Correlation

0.07

1 player

R Louw

2 player

J Cassiem

No Correlation

0.3

1 player

R Louw

2 player

K Dreyden

Weak Positive Correlation

0.36

1 player

R Louw

2 player

S Wolmarans

Weak Positive Correlation

0.05

1 player

R Louw

2 player

C Ayford

No Correlation

0.51

1 player

R Louw

2 player

M Dumpies

Positive Correlation

0.46

1 player

R Louw

2 player

J Adams

Positive Correlation

1

1 player

R Louw

2 player

R Louw

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.28

1 player

R Louw

2 player

R Robertson

Weak Negative Correlation

0.5

1 player

R Louw

2 player

R du Plooy

Positive Correlation

0.64

1 player

R Robertson

2 player

J Cassiem

Positive Correlation

0.15

1 player

R Robertson

2 player

K Dreyden

No Correlation

0

1 player

R Robertson

2 player

S Wolmarans

No Correlation

1

1 player

R Robertson

2 player

C Ayford

Strong Positive Correlation

0.1

1 player

R Robertson

2 player

M Dumpies

No Correlation

0.12

1 player

R Robertson

2 player

J Adams

No Correlation

-0.28

1 player

R Robertson

2 player

R Louw

Weak Negative Correlation

1

1 player

R Robertson

2 player

R Robertson

Strong Positive Correlation

0

1 player

R Robertson

2 player

R du Plooy

No Correlation

0.85

1 player

R du Plooy

2 player

J Cassiem

Strong Positive Correlation

0.3

1 player

R du Plooy

2 player

K Dreyden

Weak Positive Correlation

0.85

1 player

R du Plooy

2 player

S Wolmarans

Strong Positive Correlation

1

1 player

R du Plooy

2 player

C Ayford

Strong Positive Correlation

0.7

1 player

R du Plooy

2 player

M Dumpies

Positive Correlation

1

1 player

R du Plooy

2 player

J Adams

Strong Positive Correlation

0.5

1 player

R du Plooy

2 player

R Louw

Positive Correlation

0

1 player

R du Plooy

2 player

R Robertson

No Correlation

1

1 player

R du Plooy

2 player

R du Plooy

Strong Positive Correlation

Strong Positive Correlation

No Correlation

Strong Negative Correlation

Pick **J Cassiem** and **C Ayford** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **J Cassiem** and **R Robertson** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **J Cassiem** and **R du Plooy** together

Strong Positive Correlation

Pick **S Wolmarans** and **R du Plooy** together

Strong Positive Correlation

Pick **C Ayford** and **R Robertson** together

Strong Positive Correlation

Pick **C Ayford** and **R du Plooy** together

Strong Positive Correlation

Pick **M Dumpies** and **R du Plooy** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **J Adams** and **R du Plooy** together

Strong Positive Correlation

Pick **R Louw** and **M Copeland** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **R Robertson** and **S Mahima** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **R du Plooy** and **S Mahima** together

Positive Correlation

Similar Perfomance

M Dumpies 0.51

R du Plooy 0.5

J Adams 0.46

S Wolmarans 0.36

K Dreyden 0.3

J Cassiem 0.07

C Ayford 0.05

Opposite Perfomance

R Robertson -0.28

Similar Perfomance

R du Plooy 1

R Louw 0.46

C Ayford 0.38

J Cassiem 0.31

K Dreyden 0.3

S Wolmarans 0.22

R Robertson 0.12

M Dumpies 0.11

Similar Perfomance

R du Plooy 0.7

R Louw 0.51

C Ayford 0.44

K Dreyden 0.3

S Wolmarans 0.28

J Cassiem 0.22

J Adams 0.11

R Robertson 0.1

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

E Cunningham AR SK

C Olivier AR SK

R Henry BOW SK

A Hanekom BAT SK

R Rhode BOW SK

T Cornelissen AR SK

L Smit BAT SK

R De Bruin BAT SK

M de-Vries WK SK

W Brand WK SK

A Gqamane BOW SK

E Cunningham

C Olivier

R Henry

A Hanekom

R Rhode

T Cornelissen

L Smit

R De Bruin

M de-Vries

W Brand

A Gqamane

1

1 player

E Cunningham

2 player

E Cunningham

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.33

1 player

E Cunningham

2 player

C Olivier

Weak Negative Correlation

0.25

1 player

E Cunningham

2 player

R Henry

Weak Positive Correlation

0

1 player

E Cunningham

2 player

A Hanekom

No Correlation

-0.33

1 player

E Cunningham

2 player

R Rhode

Weak Negative Correlation

0.43

1 player

E Cunningham

2 player

T Cornelissen

Positive Correlation

-0.23

1 player

E Cunningham

2 player

L Smit

Weak Negative Correlation

0.14

1 player

E Cunningham

2 player

M de-Vries

No Correlation

0.71

1 player

E Cunningham

2 player

W Brand

Positive Correlation

0.25

1 player

E Cunningham

2 player

A Gqamane

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.33

1 player

C Olivier

2 player

E Cunningham

Weak Negative Correlation

1

1 player

C Olivier

2 player

C Olivier

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.14

1 player

C Olivier

2 player

R Henry

No Correlation

0.14

1 player

C Olivier

2 player

A Hanekom

No Correlation

0.5

1 player

C Olivier

2 player

R Rhode

Positive Correlation

0.43

1 player

C Olivier

2 player

T Cornelissen

Positive Correlation

-0.35

1 player

C Olivier

2 player

L Smit

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.25

1 player

C Olivier

2 player

M de-Vries

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.33

1 player

C Olivier

2 player

W Brand

Weak Negative Correlation

0.11

1 player

C Olivier

2 player

A Gqamane

No Correlation

0.25

1 player

R Henry

2 player

E Cunningham

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.14

1 player

R Henry

2 player

C Olivier

No Correlation

1

1 player

R Henry

2 player

R Henry

Strong Positive Correlation

0.71

1 player

R Henry

2 player

A Hanekom

Positive Correlation

0.14

1 player

R Henry

2 player

R Rhode

No Correlation

0

1 player

R Henry

2 player

T Cornelissen

No Correlation

-0.7

1 player

R Henry

2 player

L Smit

Negative Correlation

0

1 player

R Henry

2 player

M de-Vries

No Correlation

0.75

1 player

R Henry

2 player

W Brand

Positive Correlation

0.5

1 player

R Henry

2 player

A Gqamane

Positive Correlation

0

1 player

A Hanekom

2 player

E Cunningham

No Correlation

0.14

1 player

A Hanekom

2 player

C Olivier

No Correlation

0.71

1 player

A Hanekom

2 player

R Henry

Positive Correlation

1

1 player

A Hanekom

2 player

A Hanekom

Strong Positive Correlation

0.5

1 player

A Hanekom

2 player

R Rhode

Positive Correlation

-0.25

1 player

A Hanekom

2 player

T Cornelissen

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.7

1 player

A Hanekom

2 player

L Smit

Negative Correlation

-0.5

1 player

A Hanekom

2 player

M de-Vries

Negative Correlation

0.43

1 player

A Hanekom

2 player

W Brand

Positive Correlation

0.5

1 player

A Hanekom

2 player

A Gqamane

Positive Correlation

-0.33

1 player

R Rhode

2 player

E Cunningham

Weak Negative Correlation

0.5

1 player

R Rhode

2 player

C Olivier

Positive Correlation

0.14

1 player

R Rhode

2 player

R Henry

No Correlation

0.5

1 player

R Rhode

2 player

A Hanekom

Positive Correlation

1

1 player

R Rhode

2 player

R Rhode

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.25

1 player

R Rhode

2 player

T Cornelissen

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.7

1 player

R Rhode

2 player

L Smit

Negative Correlation

-0.33

1 player

R Rhode

2 player

M de-Vries

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.14

1 player

R Rhode

2 player

W Brand

No Correlation

0.33

1 player

R Rhode

2 player

A Gqamane

Weak Positive Correlation

0.43

1 player

T Cornelissen

2 player

E Cunningham

Positive Correlation

0.43

1 player

T Cornelissen

2 player

C Olivier

Positive Correlation

0

1 player

T Cornelissen

2 player

R Henry

No Correlation

-0.25

1 player

T Cornelissen

2 player

A Hanekom

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.25

1 player

T Cornelissen

2 player

R Rhode

Weak Negative Correlation

1

1 player

T Cornelissen

2 player

T Cornelissen

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.7

1 player

T Cornelissen

2 player

L Smit

Negative Correlation

0

1 player

T Cornelissen

2 player

M de-Vries

No Correlation

0.25

1 player

T Cornelissen

2 player

W Brand

Weak Positive Correlation

0

1 player

T Cornelissen

2 player

A Gqamane

No Correlation

-0.23

1 player

L Smit

2 player

E Cunningham

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.35

1 player

L Smit

2 player

C Olivier

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.7

1 player

L Smit

2 player

R Henry

Negative Correlation

-0.7

1 player

L Smit

2 player

A Hanekom

Negative Correlation

-0.7

1 player

L Smit

2 player

R Rhode

Negative Correlation

-0.7

1 player

L Smit

2 player

T Cornelissen

Negative Correlation

1

1 player

L Smit

2 player

L Smit

Strong Positive Correlation

0.23

1 player

L Smit

2 player

M de-Vries

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.7

1 player

L Smit

2 player

W Brand

Negative Correlation

-0.7

1 player

L Smit

2 player

A Gqamane

Negative Correlation

0.14

1 player

M de-Vries

2 player

E Cunningham

No Correlation

-0.25

1 player

M de-Vries

2 player

C Olivier

Weak Negative Correlation

0

1 player

M de-Vries

2 player

R Henry

No Correlation

-0.5

1 player

M de-Vries

2 player

A Hanekom

Negative Correlation

-0.33

1 player

M de-Vries

2 player

R Rhode

Weak Negative Correlation

0

1 player

M de-Vries

2 player

T Cornelissen

No Correlation

0.23

1 player

M de-Vries

2 player

L Smit

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

M de-Vries

2 player

M de-Vries

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.25

1 player

M de-Vries

2 player

W Brand

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.33

1 player

M de-Vries

2 player

A Gqamane

Weak Negative Correlation

0.71

1 player

W Brand

2 player

E Cunningham

Positive Correlation

-0.33

1 player

W Brand

2 player

C Olivier

Weak Negative Correlation

0.75

1 player

W Brand

2 player

R Henry

Positive Correlation

0.43

1 player

W Brand

2 player

A Hanekom

Positive Correlation

-0.14

1 player

W Brand

2 player

R Rhode

No Correlation

0.25

1 player

W Brand

2 player

T Cornelissen

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.7

1 player

W Brand

2 player

L Smit

Negative Correlation

-0.25

1 player

W Brand

2 player

M de-Vries

Weak Negative Correlation

1

1 player

W Brand

2 player

W Brand

Strong Positive Correlation

0.71

1 player

W Brand

2 player

A Gqamane

Positive Correlation

0.25

1 player

A Gqamane

2 player

E Cunningham

Weak Positive Correlation

0.11

1 player

A Gqamane

2 player

C Olivier

No Correlation

0.5

1 player

A Gqamane

2 player

R Henry

Positive Correlation

0.5

1 player

A Gqamane

2 player

A Hanekom

Positive Correlation

0.33

1 player

A Gqamane

2 player

R Rhode

Weak Positive Correlation

0

1 player

A Gqamane

2 player

T Cornelissen

No Correlation

-0.7

1 player

A Gqamane

2 player

L Smit

Negative Correlation

-0.33

1 player

A Gqamane

2 player

M de-Vries

Weak Negative Correlation

0.71

1 player

A Gqamane

2 player

W Brand

Positive Correlation

1

1 player

A Gqamane

2 player

A Gqamane

Strong Positive Correlation

Strong Positive Correlation

No Correlation

Strong Negative Correlation

Pick **E Cunningham** and **W Brand** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **R Henry** and **A Hanekom** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **R Henry** and **W Brand** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **L Smit** and **R De Bruin** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **R De Bruin** and **M de-Vries** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **W Brand** and **A Gqamane** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **C Olivier** and **R De Bruin** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **R Henry** and **R De Bruin** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **A Hanekom** and **L Smit** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **A Hanekom** and **R De Bruin** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **R Rhode** and **L Smit** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **R Rhode** and **R De Bruin** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **T Cornelissen** and **L Smit** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **L Smit** and **W Brand** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **L Smit** and **A Gqamane** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **R De Bruin** and **A Gqamane** together

Negative Correlation

Similar Perfomance

W Brand 0.71

R Henry 0.5

A Hanekom 0.5

R Rhode 0.33

E Cunningham 0.25

C Olivier 0.11

Opposite Perfomance

L Smit -0.7

M de-Vries -0.33

Similar Perfomance

R Henry 0.71

R Rhode 0.5

A Gqamane 0.5

W Brand 0.43

C Olivier 0.14

Opposite Perfomance

L Smit -0.7

M de-Vries -0.5

T Cornelissen -0.25

Similar Perfomance

C Olivier 0.5

A Hanekom 0.5

A Gqamane 0.33

R Henry 0.14

Opposite Perfomance

L Smit -0.7

E Cunningham -0.33

M de-Vries -0.33

T Cornelissen -0.25

W Brand -0.14

Similar Perfomance

W Brand 0.75

A Hanekom 0.71

A Gqamane 0.5

E Cunningham 0.25

R Rhode 0.14

Opposite Perfomance

L Smit -0.7

C Olivier -0.14

Similar Perfomance

W Brand 0.71

T Cornelissen 0.43

R Henry 0.25

A Gqamane 0.25

M de-Vries 0.14

Opposite Perfomance

C Olivier -0.33

R Rhode -0.33

L Smit -0.23

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

J Cassiem WK WEW

K Dreyden BOW WEW

S Wolmarans BOW WEW

C Ayford BAT WEW

M Dumpies BOW WEW

J Adams AR WEW

R Louw BAT WEW

R Robertson WK WEW

R du Plooy AR WEW

S Mahima AR WEW

M Copeland BAT WEW

J Cassiem

K Dreyden

S Wolmarans

C Ayford

M Dumpies

J Adams

R Louw

R Robertson

R du Plooy

S Mahima

M Copeland

1

1 player

J Cassiem

2 player

J Cassiem

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.5

1 player

J Cassiem

2 player

K Dreyden

Negative Correlation

-0.33

1 player

J Cassiem

2 player

S Wolmarans

Weak Negative Correlation

0.14

1 player

J Cassiem

2 player

C Ayford

No Correlation

-0.56

1 player

J Cassiem

2 player

M Dumpies

Negative Correlation

-0.11

1 player

J Cassiem

2 player

J Adams

No Correlation

-0.25

1 player

J Cassiem

2 player

R Louw

Weak Negative Correlation

0.42

1 player

J Cassiem

2 player

R Robertson

Positive Correlation

0.7

1 player

J Cassiem

2 player

R du Plooy

Positive Correlation

-0.5

1 player

K Dreyden

2 player

J Cassiem

Negative Correlation

1

1 player

K Dreyden

2 player

K Dreyden

Strong Positive Correlation

0

1 player

K Dreyden

2 player

S Wolmarans

No Correlation

0.33

1 player

K Dreyden

2 player

C Ayford

Weak Positive Correlation

0.14

1 player

K Dreyden

2 player

M Dumpies

No Correlation

-0.14

1 player

K Dreyden

2 player

J Adams

No Correlation

-0.33

1 player

K Dreyden

2 player

R Louw

Weak Negative Correlation

0

1 player

K Dreyden

2 player

R Robertson

No Correlation

-0.7

1 player

K Dreyden

2 player

R du Plooy

Negative Correlation

-0.33

1 player

S Wolmarans

2 player

J Cassiem

Weak Negative Correlation

0

1 player

S Wolmarans

2 player

K Dreyden

No Correlation

1

1 player

S Wolmarans

2 player

S Wolmarans

Strong Positive Correlation

0

1 player

S Wolmarans

2 player

C Ayford

No Correlation

0.42

1 player

S Wolmarans

2 player

M Dumpies

Positive Correlation

0.42

1 player

S Wolmarans

2 player

J Adams

Positive Correlation

0.42

1 player

S Wolmarans

2 player

R Louw

Positive Correlation

-0.35

1 player

S Wolmarans

2 player

R Robertson

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.7

1 player

S Wolmarans

2 player

R du Plooy

Negative Correlation

0.14

1 player

C Ayford

2 player

J Cassiem

No Correlation

0.33

1 player

C Ayford

2 player

K Dreyden

Weak Positive Correlation

0

1 player

C Ayford

2 player

S Wolmarans

No Correlation

1

1 player

C Ayford

2 player

C Ayford

Strong Positive Correlation

0.43

1 player

C Ayford

2 player

M Dumpies

Positive Correlation

-0.33

1 player

C Ayford

2 player

J Adams

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.67

1 player

C Ayford

2 player

R Louw

Negative Correlation

0.7

1 player

C Ayford

2 player

R Robertson

Positive Correlation

-0.7

1 player

C Ayford

2 player

R du Plooy

Negative Correlation

-0.56

1 player

M Dumpies

2 player

J Cassiem

Negative Correlation

0.14

1 player

M Dumpies

2 player

K Dreyden

No Correlation

0.42

1 player

M Dumpies

2 player

S Wolmarans

Positive Correlation

0.43

1 player

M Dumpies

2 player

C Ayford

Positive Correlation

1

1 player

M Dumpies

2 player

M Dumpies

Strong Positive Correlation

0

1 player

M Dumpies

2 player

J Adams

No Correlation

0.14

1 player

M Dumpies

2 player

R Louw

No Correlation

0

1 player

M Dumpies

2 player

R Robertson

No Correlation

-0.7

1 player

M Dumpies

2 player

R du Plooy

Negative Correlation

-0.11

1 player

J Adams

2 player

J Cassiem

No Correlation

-0.14

1 player

J Adams

2 player

K Dreyden

No Correlation

0.42

1 player

J Adams

2 player

S Wolmarans

Positive Correlation

-0.33

1 player

J Adams

2 player

C Ayford

Weak Negative Correlation

0

1 player

J Adams

2 player

M Dumpies

No Correlation

1

1 player

J Adams

2 player

J Adams

Strong Positive Correlation

0.71

1 player

J Adams

2 player

R Louw

Positive Correlation

-0.14

1 player

J Adams

2 player

R Robertson

No Correlation

-0.7

1 player

J Adams

2 player

R du Plooy

Negative Correlation

-0.25

1 player

R Louw

2 player

J Cassiem

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.33

1 player

R Louw

2 player

K Dreyden

Weak Negative Correlation

0.42

1 player

R Louw

2 player

S Wolmarans

Positive Correlation

-0.67

1 player

R Louw

2 player

C Ayford

Negative Correlation

0.14

1 player

R Louw

2 player

M Dumpies

No Correlation

0.71

1 player

R Louw

2 player

J Adams

Positive Correlation

1

1 player

R Louw

2 player

R Louw

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.35

1 player

R Louw

2 player

R Robertson

Weak Negative Correlation

0.7

1 player

R Louw

2 player

R du Plooy

Positive Correlation

0.42

1 player

R Robertson

2 player

J Cassiem

Positive Correlation

0

1 player

R Robertson

2 player

K Dreyden

No Correlation

-0.35

1 player

R Robertson

2 player

S Wolmarans

Weak Negative Correlation

0.7

1 player

R Robertson

2 player

C Ayford

Positive Correlation

0

1 player

R Robertson

2 player

M Dumpies

No Correlation

-0.14

1 player

R Robertson

2 player

J Adams

No Correlation

-0.35

1 player

R Robertson

2 player

R Louw

Weak Negative Correlation

1

1 player

R Robertson

2 player

R Robertson

Strong Positive Correlation

0

1 player

R Robertson

2 player

R du Plooy

No Correlation

0.7

1 player

R du Plooy

2 player

J Cassiem

Positive Correlation

-0.7

1 player

R du Plooy

2 player

K Dreyden

Negative Correlation

-0.7

1 player

R du Plooy

2 player

S Wolmarans

Negative Correlation

-0.7

1 player

R du Plooy

2 player

C Ayford

Negative Correlation

-0.7

1 player

R du Plooy

2 player

M Dumpies

Negative Correlation

-0.7

1 player

R du Plooy

2 player

J Adams

Negative Correlation

0.7

1 player

R du Plooy

2 player

R Louw

Positive Correlation

0

1 player

R du Plooy

2 player

R Robertson

No Correlation

1

1 player

R du Plooy

2 player

R du Plooy

Strong Positive Correlation

Strong Positive Correlation

No Correlation

Strong Negative Correlation

Pick **J Adams** and **R Louw** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **R Louw** and **R du Plooy** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **K Dreyden** and **R du Plooy** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **S Wolmarans** and **M Copeland** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **C Ayford** and **R Louw** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **C Ayford** and **M Copeland** together

Negative Correlation

Similar Perfomance

R Louw 0.71

S Wolmarans 0.42

Opposite Perfomance

R du Plooy -0.7

C Ayford -0.33

K Dreyden -0.14

R Robertson -0.14

J Cassiem -0.11

Similar Perfomance

J Adams 0.71

R du Plooy 0.7

S Wolmarans 0.42

M Dumpies 0.14

Opposite Perfomance

C Ayford -0.67

R Robertson -0.35

K Dreyden -0.33

J Cassiem -0.25

Similar Perfomance

C Ayford 0.33

M Dumpies 0.14

Opposite Perfomance

R du Plooy -0.7

J Cassiem -0.5

R Louw -0.33

J Adams -0.14