SVP vs ND

This guide is super useful for identifying player combinations that are likely to score big. Use the filters to identify the best player combinations according to specific match scenarios.

Both players generally perform similarly when picked together. They either score high together or score low together. Maximise FPts by picking players that correlate positively with top players.

Both players generally perform in an opposite manner. If one player scores high, the other usually scores low. Avoid picking players that correlate negatively with top player

Show Player Combinations on the basis of:

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

D Wyatt BAT SVP

L Smith BOW SVP

F Davies BAT SVP

G Elwiss BAT SVP

C Knott AR SVP

R Southby WK SVP

G Adams AR SVP

C Dean BOW SVP

L Bell BOW SVP

M Bouchier BAT SVP

F Kemp BOW SVP

D Wyatt

L Smith

F Davies

G Elwiss

C Knott

R Southby

G Adams

C Dean

L Bell

M Bouchier

F Kemp

1

1 player

L Smith

2 player

L Smith

Strong Positive Correlation

0.23

1 player

L Smith

2 player

G Elwiss

Weak Positive Correlation

0.37

1 player

L Smith

2 player

C Knott

Weak Positive Correlation

0.43

1 player

L Smith

2 player

R Southby

Positive Correlation

0.36

1 player

L Smith

2 player

G Adams

Weak Positive Correlation

0.37

1 player

L Smith

2 player

C Dean

Weak Positive Correlation

0.41

1 player

L Smith

2 player

L Bell

Positive Correlation

0.29

1 player

L Smith

2 player

M Bouchier

Weak Positive Correlation

0.12

1 player

L Smith

2 player

F Kemp

No Correlation

0.23

1 player

G Elwiss

2 player

L Smith

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

G Elwiss

2 player

G Elwiss

Strong Positive Correlation

0.39

1 player

G Elwiss

2 player

C Knott

Weak Positive Correlation

0.33

1 player

G Elwiss

2 player

R Southby

Weak Positive Correlation

0.34

1 player

G Elwiss

2 player

G Adams

Weak Positive Correlation

0.09

1 player

G Elwiss

2 player

C Dean

No Correlation

0.34

1 player

G Elwiss

2 player

L Bell

Weak Positive Correlation

0.39

1 player

G Elwiss

2 player

M Bouchier

Weak Positive Correlation

0.35

1 player

G Elwiss

2 player

F Kemp

Weak Positive Correlation

0.37

1 player

C Knott

2 player

L Smith

Weak Positive Correlation

0.39

1 player

C Knott

2 player

G Elwiss

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

C Knott

2 player

C Knott

Strong Positive Correlation

0.25

1 player

C Knott

2 player

R Southby

Weak Positive Correlation

0.59

1 player

C Knott

2 player

G Adams

Positive Correlation

0.42

1 player

C Knott

2 player

C Dean

Positive Correlation

0.62

1 player

C Knott

2 player

L Bell

Positive Correlation

0.18

1 player

C Knott

2 player

M Bouchier

No Correlation

0.32

1 player

C Knott

2 player

F Kemp

Weak Positive Correlation

0.43

1 player

R Southby

2 player

L Smith

Positive Correlation

0.33

1 player

R Southby

2 player

G Elwiss

Weak Positive Correlation

0.25

1 player

R Southby

2 player

C Knott

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

R Southby

2 player

R Southby

Strong Positive Correlation

0.22

1 player

R Southby

2 player

G Adams

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.12

1 player

R Southby

2 player

C Dean

No Correlation

0.18

1 player

R Southby

2 player

L Bell

No Correlation

0.44

1 player

R Southby

2 player

M Bouchier

Positive Correlation

0.59

1 player

R Southby

2 player

F Kemp

Positive Correlation

0.36

1 player

G Adams

2 player

L Smith

Weak Positive Correlation

0.34

1 player

G Adams

2 player

G Elwiss

Weak Positive Correlation

0.59

1 player

G Adams

2 player

C Knott

Positive Correlation

0.22

1 player

G Adams

2 player

R Southby

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

G Adams

2 player

G Adams

Strong Positive Correlation

0.47

1 player

G Adams

2 player

C Dean

Positive Correlation

0.21

1 player

G Adams

2 player

L Bell

Weak Positive Correlation

0.29

1 player

G Adams

2 player

M Bouchier

Weak Positive Correlation

0.12

1 player

G Adams

2 player

F Kemp

No Correlation

0.37

1 player

C Dean

2 player

L Smith

Weak Positive Correlation

0.09

1 player

C Dean

2 player

G Elwiss

No Correlation

0.42

1 player

C Dean

2 player

C Knott

Positive Correlation

-0.12

1 player

C Dean

2 player

R Southby

No Correlation

0.47

1 player

C Dean

2 player

G Adams

Positive Correlation

1

1 player

C Dean

2 player

C Dean

Strong Positive Correlation

0.02

1 player

C Dean

2 player

L Bell

No Correlation

0.18

1 player

C Dean

2 player

M Bouchier

No Correlation

-0.01

1 player

C Dean

2 player

F Kemp

No Correlation

0.41

1 player

L Bell

2 player

L Smith

Positive Correlation

0.34

1 player

L Bell

2 player

G Elwiss

Weak Positive Correlation

0.62

1 player

L Bell

2 player

C Knott

Positive Correlation

0.18

1 player

L Bell

2 player

R Southby

No Correlation

0.21

1 player

L Bell

2 player

G Adams

Weak Positive Correlation

0.02

1 player

L Bell

2 player

C Dean

No Correlation

1

1 player

L Bell

2 player

L Bell

Strong Positive Correlation

0.35

1 player

L Bell

2 player

M Bouchier

Weak Positive Correlation

0.11

1 player

L Bell

2 player

F Kemp

No Correlation

0.29

1 player

M Bouchier

2 player

L Smith

Weak Positive Correlation

0.39

1 player

M Bouchier

2 player

G Elwiss

Weak Positive Correlation

0.18

1 player

M Bouchier

2 player

C Knott

No Correlation

0.44

1 player

M Bouchier

2 player

R Southby

Positive Correlation

0.29

1 player

M Bouchier

2 player

G Adams

Weak Positive Correlation

0.18

1 player

M Bouchier

2 player

C Dean

No Correlation

0.35

1 player

M Bouchier

2 player

L Bell

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

M Bouchier

2 player

M Bouchier

Strong Positive Correlation

0.31

1 player

M Bouchier

2 player

F Kemp

Weak Positive Correlation

0.12

1 player

F Kemp

2 player

L Smith

No Correlation

0.35

1 player

F Kemp

2 player

G Elwiss

Weak Positive Correlation

0.32

1 player

F Kemp

2 player

C Knott

Weak Positive Correlation

0.59

1 player

F Kemp

2 player

R Southby

Positive Correlation

0.12

1 player

F Kemp

2 player

G Adams

No Correlation

-0.01

1 player

F Kemp

2 player

C Dean

No Correlation

0.11

1 player

F Kemp

2 player

L Bell

No Correlation

0.31

1 player

F Kemp

2 player

M Bouchier

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

F Kemp

2 player

F Kemp

Strong Positive Correlation

Strong Positive Correlation

No Correlation

Strong Negative Correlation

Pick **C Knott** and **L Bell** together

Positive Correlation

Similar Perfomance

C Knott 0.59

C Dean 0.47

L Smith 0.36

G Elwiss 0.34

M Bouchier 0.29

R Southby 0.22

L Bell 0.21

F Kemp 0.12

Similar Perfomance

G Adams 0.47

C Knott 0.42

L Smith 0.37

M Bouchier 0.18

G Elwiss 0.09

L Bell 0.02

Opposite Perfomance

R Southby -0.12

F Kemp -0.01

Similar Perfomance

C Knott 0.39

M Bouchier 0.39

F Kemp 0.35

G Adams 0.34

L Bell 0.34

R Southby 0.33

L Smith 0.23

C Dean 0.09

Similar Perfomance

R Southby 0.43

L Bell 0.41

C Knott 0.37

C Dean 0.37

G Adams 0.36

M Bouchier 0.29

G Elwiss 0.23

F Kemp 0.12

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

E Marlow BAT ND

E Burns AR ND

B Heath WK ND

K Levick BOW ND

H Armitage AR ND

S Kalis BAT ND

L Dobson BAT ND

R Slater BOW ND

R Duckworth BAT ND

S Turner BOW ND

K Fraser AR ND

E Marlow

E Burns

B Heath

K Levick

H Armitage

S Kalis

L Dobson

R Slater

R Duckworth

S Turner

K Fraser

1

1 player

E Marlow

2 player

E Marlow

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.13

1 player

E Marlow

2 player

E Burns

No Correlation

0.46

1 player

E Marlow

2 player

B Heath

Positive Correlation

-0.11

1 player

E Marlow

2 player

K Levick

No Correlation

0.04

1 player

E Marlow

2 player

H Armitage

No Correlation

0.28

1 player

E Marlow

2 player

S Kalis

Weak Positive Correlation

0.38

1 player

E Marlow

2 player

L Dobson

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.05

1 player

E Marlow

2 player

R Slater

No Correlation

0.2

1 player

E Marlow

2 player

S Turner

Weak Positive Correlation

0.32

1 player

E Marlow

2 player

K Fraser

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.13

1 player

E Burns

2 player

E Marlow

No Correlation

1

1 player

E Burns

2 player

E Burns

Strong Positive Correlation

0.15

1 player

E Burns

2 player

B Heath

No Correlation

0.25

1 player

E Burns

2 player

K Levick

Weak Positive Correlation

0.01

1 player

E Burns

2 player

H Armitage

No Correlation

0.12

1 player

E Burns

2 player

S Kalis

No Correlation

-0.09

1 player

E Burns

2 player

L Dobson

No Correlation

0.09

1 player

E Burns

2 player

R Slater

No Correlation

-0.22

1 player

E Burns

2 player

S Turner

Weak Negative Correlation

0.32

1 player

E Burns

2 player

K Fraser

Weak Positive Correlation

0.46

1 player

B Heath

2 player

E Marlow

Positive Correlation

0.15

1 player

B Heath

2 player

E Burns

No Correlation

1

1 player

B Heath

2 player

B Heath

Strong Positive Correlation

0.28

1 player

B Heath

2 player

K Levick

Weak Positive Correlation

0.14

1 player

B Heath

2 player

H Armitage

No Correlation

0.33

1 player

B Heath

2 player

S Kalis

Weak Positive Correlation

0.25

1 player

B Heath

2 player

L Dobson

Weak Positive Correlation

0.23

1 player

B Heath

2 player

R Slater

Weak Positive Correlation

0.22

1 player

B Heath

2 player

S Turner

Weak Positive Correlation

0.21

1 player

B Heath

2 player

K Fraser

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.11

1 player

K Levick

2 player

E Marlow

No Correlation

0.25

1 player

K Levick

2 player

E Burns

Weak Positive Correlation

0.28

1 player

K Levick

2 player

B Heath

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

K Levick

2 player

K Levick

Strong Positive Correlation

0.1

1 player

K Levick

2 player

H Armitage

No Correlation

0.24

1 player

K Levick

2 player

S Kalis

Weak Positive Correlation

0.12

1 player

K Levick

2 player

L Dobson

No Correlation

0.28

1 player

K Levick

2 player

R Slater

Weak Positive Correlation

0.4

1 player

K Levick

2 player

S Turner

Positive Correlation

0.19

1 player

K Levick

2 player

K Fraser

No Correlation

0.04

1 player

H Armitage

2 player

E Marlow

No Correlation

0.01

1 player

H Armitage

2 player

E Burns

No Correlation

0.14

1 player

H Armitage

2 player

B Heath

No Correlation

0.1

1 player

H Armitage

2 player

K Levick

No Correlation

1

1 player

H Armitage

2 player

H Armitage

Strong Positive Correlation

0.06

1 player

H Armitage

2 player

S Kalis

No Correlation

0.14

1 player

H Armitage

2 player

L Dobson

No Correlation

0.35

1 player

H Armitage

2 player

R Slater

Weak Positive Correlation

0.2

1 player

H Armitage

2 player

S Turner

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.04

1 player

H Armitage

2 player

K Fraser

No Correlation

0.28

1 player

S Kalis

2 player

E Marlow

Weak Positive Correlation

0.12

1 player

S Kalis

2 player

E Burns

No Correlation

0.33

1 player

S Kalis

2 player

B Heath

Weak Positive Correlation

0.24

1 player

S Kalis

2 player

K Levick

Weak Positive Correlation

0.06

1 player

S Kalis

2 player

H Armitage

No Correlation

1

1 player

S Kalis

2 player

S Kalis

Strong Positive Correlation

0.21

1 player

S Kalis

2 player

L Dobson

Weak Positive Correlation

0.23

1 player

S Kalis

2 player

R Slater

Weak Positive Correlation

0.44

1 player

S Kalis

2 player

S Turner

Positive Correlation

0.38

1 player

S Kalis

2 player

K Fraser

Weak Positive Correlation

0.38

1 player

L Dobson

2 player

E Marlow

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.09

1 player

L Dobson

2 player

E Burns

No Correlation

0.25

1 player

L Dobson

2 player

B Heath

Weak Positive Correlation

0.12

1 player

L Dobson

2 player

K Levick

No Correlation

0.14

1 player

L Dobson

2 player

H Armitage

No Correlation

0.21

1 player

L Dobson

2 player

S Kalis

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

L Dobson

2 player

L Dobson

Strong Positive Correlation

0.2

1 player

L Dobson

2 player

R Slater

Weak Positive Correlation

0.1

1 player

L Dobson

2 player

S Turner

No Correlation

0.26

1 player

L Dobson

2 player

K Fraser

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.05

1 player

R Slater

2 player

E Marlow

No Correlation

0.09

1 player

R Slater

2 player

E Burns

No Correlation

0.23

1 player

R Slater

2 player

B Heath

Weak Positive Correlation

0.28

1 player

R Slater

2 player

K Levick

Weak Positive Correlation

0.35

1 player

R Slater

2 player

H Armitage

Weak Positive Correlation

0.23

1 player

R Slater

2 player

S Kalis

Weak Positive Correlation

0.2

1 player

R Slater

2 player

L Dobson

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

R Slater

2 player

R Slater

Strong Positive Correlation

0

1 player

R Slater

2 player

S Turner

No Correlation

0.17

1 player

R Slater

2 player

K Fraser

No Correlation

0.2

1 player

S Turner

2 player

E Marlow

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.22

1 player

S Turner

2 player

E Burns

Weak Negative Correlation

0.22

1 player

S Turner

2 player

B Heath

Weak Positive Correlation

0.4

1 player

S Turner

2 player

K Levick

Positive Correlation

0.2

1 player

S Turner

2 player

H Armitage

Weak Positive Correlation

0.44

1 player

S Turner

2 player

S Kalis

Positive Correlation

0.1

1 player

S Turner

2 player

L Dobson

No Correlation

0

1 player

S Turner

2 player

R Slater

No Correlation

1

1 player

S Turner

2 player

S Turner

Strong Positive Correlation

0.47

1 player

S Turner

2 player

K Fraser

Positive Correlation

0.32

1 player

K Fraser

2 player

E Marlow

Weak Positive Correlation

0.32

1 player

K Fraser

2 player

E Burns

Weak Positive Correlation

0.21

1 player

K Fraser

2 player

B Heath

Weak Positive Correlation

0.19

1 player

K Fraser

2 player

K Levick

No Correlation

-0.04

1 player

K Fraser

2 player

H Armitage

No Correlation

0.38

1 player

K Fraser

2 player

S Kalis

Weak Positive Correlation

0.26

1 player

K Fraser

2 player

L Dobson

Weak Positive Correlation

0.17

1 player

K Fraser

2 player

R Slater

No Correlation

0.47

1 player

K Fraser

2 player

S Turner

Positive Correlation

1

1 player

K Fraser

2 player

K Fraser

Strong Positive Correlation

Strong Positive Correlation

No Correlation

Strong Negative Correlation

Pick **L Dobson** and **R Duckworth** together

Positive Correlation

Similar Perfomance

S Turner 0.4

B Heath 0.28

R Slater 0.28

E Burns 0.25

S Kalis 0.24

K Fraser 0.19

L Dobson 0.12

H Armitage 0.1

Opposite Perfomance

E Marlow -0.11

Similar Perfomance

R Slater 0.35

S Turner 0.2

B Heath 0.14

L Dobson 0.14

K Levick 0.1

S Kalis 0.06

E Marlow 0.04

E Burns 0.01

Opposite Perfomance

K Fraser -0.04

Similar Perfomance

E Marlow 0.46

S Kalis 0.33

K Levick 0.28

L Dobson 0.25

R Slater 0.23

S Turner 0.22

K Fraser 0.21

E Burns 0.15

H Armitage 0.14

Similar Perfomance

K Fraser 0.32

K Levick 0.25

B Heath 0.15

S Kalis 0.12

R Slater 0.09

H Armitage 0.01

Opposite Perfomance

S Turner -0.22

E Marlow -0.13

L Dobson -0.09

Similar Perfomance

S Turner 0.44

K Fraser 0.38

B Heath 0.33

E Marlow 0.28

K Levick 0.24

R Slater 0.23

L Dobson 0.21

E Burns 0.12

H Armitage 0.06

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

D Wyatt BAT SVP

L Smith BOW SVP

F Davies BAT SVP

G Elwiss BAT SVP

C Knott AR SVP

R Southby WK SVP

G Adams AR SVP

C Dean BOW SVP

L Bell BOW SVP

M Bouchier BAT SVP

F Kemp BOW SVP

D Wyatt

L Smith

F Davies

G Elwiss

C Knott

R Southby

G Adams

C Dean

L Bell

M Bouchier

F Kemp

1

1 player

L Smith

2 player

L Smith

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.2

1 player

L Smith

2 player

G Elwiss

No Correlation

0.2

1 player

L Smith

2 player

C Knott

Weak Positive Correlation

0.2

1 player

L Smith

2 player

R Southby

Weak Positive Correlation

0.18

1 player

L Smith

2 player

G Adams

No Correlation

0.33

1 player

L Smith

2 player

C Dean

Weak Positive Correlation

0.2

1 player

L Smith

2 player

L Bell

Weak Positive Correlation

0.23

1 player

L Smith

2 player

M Bouchier

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.38

1 player

L Smith

2 player

F Kemp

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.2

1 player

G Elwiss

2 player

L Smith

No Correlation

1

1 player

G Elwiss

2 player

G Elwiss

Strong Positive Correlation

0.2

1 player

G Elwiss

2 player

C Knott

Weak Positive Correlation

0

1 player

G Elwiss

2 player

R Southby

No Correlation

0.41

1 player

G Elwiss

2 player

G Adams

Positive Correlation

-0.29

1 player

G Elwiss

2 player

C Dean

Weak Negative Correlation

0.14

1 player

G Elwiss

2 player

L Bell

No Correlation

0.12

1 player

G Elwiss

2 player

M Bouchier

No Correlation

0.16

1 player

G Elwiss

2 player

F Kemp

No Correlation

0.2

1 player

C Knott

2 player

L Smith

Weak Positive Correlation

0.2

1 player

C Knott

2 player

G Elwiss

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

C Knott

2 player

C Knott

Strong Positive Correlation

0.09

1 player

C Knott

2 player

R Southby

No Correlation

0.6

1 player

C Knott

2 player

G Adams

Positive Correlation

0.67

1 player

C Knott

2 player

C Dean

Positive Correlation

0.35

1 player

C Knott

2 player

L Bell

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.14

1 player

C Knott

2 player

M Bouchier

No Correlation

0.11

1 player

C Knott

2 player

F Kemp

No Correlation

0.2

1 player

R Southby

2 player

L Smith

Weak Positive Correlation

0

1 player

R Southby

2 player

G Elwiss

No Correlation

0.09

1 player

R Southby

2 player

C Knott

No Correlation

1

1 player

R Southby

2 player

R Southby

Strong Positive Correlation

0.2

1 player

R Southby

2 player

G Adams

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.33

1 player

R Southby

2 player

C Dean

Weak Negative Correlation

0

1 player

R Southby

2 player

L Bell

No Correlation

0.7

1 player

R Southby

2 player

M Bouchier

Positive Correlation

0.78

1 player

R Southby

2 player

F Kemp

Positive Correlation

0.18

1 player

G Adams

2 player

L Smith

No Correlation

0.41

1 player

G Adams

2 player

G Elwiss

Positive Correlation

0.6

1 player

G Adams

2 player

C Knott

Positive Correlation

0.2

1 player

G Adams

2 player

R Southby

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

G Adams

2 player

G Adams

Strong Positive Correlation

0.38

1 player

G Adams

2 player

C Dean

Weak Positive Correlation

0.33

1 player

G Adams

2 player

L Bell

Weak Positive Correlation

0.33

1 player

G Adams

2 player

M Bouchier

Weak Positive Correlation

0

1 player

G Adams

2 player

F Kemp

No Correlation

0.33

1 player

C Dean

2 player

L Smith

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.29

1 player

C Dean

2 player

G Elwiss

Weak Negative Correlation

0.67

1 player

C Dean

2 player

C Knott

Positive Correlation

-0.33

1 player

C Dean

2 player

R Southby

Weak Negative Correlation

0.38

1 player

C Dean

2 player

G Adams

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

C Dean

2 player

C Dean

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.09

1 player

C Dean

2 player

L Bell

No Correlation

0.14

1 player

C Dean

2 player

M Bouchier

No Correlation

-0.09

1 player

C Dean

2 player

F Kemp

No Correlation

0.2

1 player

L Bell

2 player

L Smith

Weak Positive Correlation

0.14

1 player

L Bell

2 player

G Elwiss

No Correlation

0.35

1 player

L Bell

2 player

C Knott

Weak Positive Correlation

0

1 player

L Bell

2 player

R Southby

No Correlation

0.33

1 player

L Bell

2 player

G Adams

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.09

1 player

L Bell

2 player

C Dean

No Correlation

1

1 player

L Bell

2 player

L Bell

Strong Positive Correlation

0.33

1 player

L Bell

2 player

M Bouchier

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.33

1 player

L Bell

2 player

F Kemp

Weak Negative Correlation

0.23

1 player

M Bouchier

2 player

L Smith

Weak Positive Correlation

0.12

1 player

M Bouchier

2 player

G Elwiss

No Correlation

-0.14

1 player

M Bouchier

2 player

C Knott

No Correlation

0.7

1 player

M Bouchier

2 player

R Southby

Positive Correlation

0.33

1 player

M Bouchier

2 player

G Adams

Weak Positive Correlation

0.14

1 player

M Bouchier

2 player

C Dean

No Correlation

0.33

1 player

M Bouchier

2 player

L Bell

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

M Bouchier

2 player

M Bouchier

Strong Positive Correlation

0.47

1 player

M Bouchier

2 player

F Kemp

Positive Correlation

-0.38

1 player

F Kemp

2 player

L Smith

Weak Negative Correlation

0.16

1 player

F Kemp

2 player

G Elwiss

No Correlation

0.11

1 player

F Kemp

2 player

C Knott

No Correlation

0.78

1 player

F Kemp

2 player

R Southby

Positive Correlation

0

1 player

F Kemp

2 player

G Adams

No Correlation

-0.09

1 player

F Kemp

2 player

C Dean

No Correlation

-0.33

1 player

F Kemp

2 player

L Bell

Weak Negative Correlation

0.47

1 player

F Kemp

2 player

M Bouchier

Positive Correlation

1

1 player

F Kemp

2 player

F Kemp

Strong Positive Correlation

Strong Positive Correlation

No Correlation

Strong Negative Correlation

Pick **C Knott** and **G Adams** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **C Knott** and **C Dean** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **R Southby** and **M Bouchier** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **R Southby** and **F Kemp** together

Positive Correlation

Similar Perfomance

C Knott 0.6

G Elwiss 0.41

C Dean 0.38

L Bell 0.33

M Bouchier 0.33

R Southby 0.2

L Smith 0.18

Similar Perfomance

G Adams 0.41

C Knott 0.2

F Kemp 0.16

L Bell 0.14

M Bouchier 0.12

Opposite Perfomance

C Dean -0.29

L Smith -0.2

Similar Perfomance

C Dean 0.33

M Bouchier 0.23

C Knott 0.2

R Southby 0.2

L Bell 0.2

G Adams 0.18

Opposite Perfomance

F Kemp -0.38

G Elwiss -0.2

Similar Perfomance

C Knott 0.67

G Adams 0.38

L Smith 0.33

M Bouchier 0.14

Opposite Perfomance

R Southby -0.33

G Elwiss -0.29

L Bell -0.09

F Kemp -0.09

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

E Marlow BAT ND

E Burns AR ND

B Heath WK ND

K Levick BOW ND

H Armitage AR ND

S Kalis BAT ND

L Dobson BAT ND

R Slater BOW ND

R Duckworth BAT ND

S Turner BOW ND

K Fraser AR ND

E Marlow

E Burns

B Heath

K Levick

H Armitage

S Kalis

L Dobson

R Slater

R Duckworth

S Turner

K Fraser

1

1 player

E Marlow

2 player

E Marlow

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.56

1 player

E Marlow

2 player

E Burns

Negative Correlation

0

1 player

E Marlow

2 player

B Heath

No Correlation

-0.38

1 player

E Marlow

2 player

K Levick

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.25

1 player

E Marlow

2 player

H Armitage

Weak Negative Correlation

0.14

1 player

E Marlow

2 player

S Kalis

No Correlation

0.33

1 player

E Marlow

2 player

L Dobson

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.29

1 player

E Marlow

2 player

R Slater

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.25

1 player

E Marlow

2 player

S Turner

Weak Negative Correlation

0.2

1 player

E Marlow

2 player

K Fraser

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.56

1 player

E Burns

2 player

E Marlow

Negative Correlation

1

1 player

E Burns

2 player

E Burns

Strong Positive Correlation

0

1 player

E Burns

2 player

B Heath

No Correlation

0

1 player

E Burns

2 player

K Levick

No Correlation

0.2

1 player

E Burns

2 player

H Armitage

Weak Positive Correlation

0

1 player

E Burns

2 player

S Kalis

No Correlation

-0.56

1 player

E Burns

2 player

L Dobson

Negative Correlation

-0.11

1 player

E Burns

2 player

R Slater

No Correlation

-0.14

1 player

E Burns

2 player

S Turner

No Correlation

0

1 player

E Burns

2 player

K Fraser

No Correlation

0

1 player

B Heath

2 player

E Marlow

No Correlation

0

1 player

B Heath

2 player

E Burns

No Correlation

1

1 player

B Heath

2 player

B Heath

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.04

1 player

B Heath

2 player

K Levick

No Correlation

-0.12

1 player

B Heath

2 player

H Armitage

No Correlation

0.08

1 player

B Heath

2 player

S Kalis

No Correlation

-0.18

1 player

B Heath

2 player

L Dobson

No Correlation

-0.2

1 player

B Heath

2 player

R Slater

No Correlation

0

1 player

B Heath

2 player

S Turner

No Correlation

0.2

1 player

B Heath

2 player

K Fraser

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.38

1 player

K Levick

2 player

E Marlow

Weak Negative Correlation

0

1 player

K Levick

2 player

E Burns

No Correlation

-0.04

1 player

K Levick

2 player

B Heath

No Correlation

1

1 player

K Levick

2 player

K Levick

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.17

1 player

K Levick

2 player

H Armitage

No Correlation

0.04

1 player

K Levick

2 player

S Kalis

No Correlation

-0.04

1 player

K Levick

2 player

L Dobson

No Correlation

-0.06

1 player

K Levick

2 player

R Slater

No Correlation

0.33

1 player

K Levick

2 player

S Turner

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.12

1 player

K Levick

2 player

K Fraser

No Correlation

-0.25

1 player

H Armitage

2 player

E Marlow

Weak Negative Correlation

0.2

1 player

H Armitage

2 player

E Burns

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.12

1 player

H Armitage

2 player

B Heath

No Correlation

-0.17

1 player

H Armitage

2 player

K Levick

No Correlation

1

1 player

H Armitage

2 player

H Armitage

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.48

1 player

H Armitage

2 player

S Kalis

Negative Correlation

-0.12

1 player

H Armitage

2 player

L Dobson

No Correlation

0.18

1 player

H Armitage

2 player

R Slater

No Correlation

-0.11

1 player

H Armitage

2 player

S Turner

No Correlation

-0.12

1 player

H Armitage

2 player

K Fraser

No Correlation

0.14

1 player

S Kalis

2 player

E Marlow

No Correlation

0

1 player

S Kalis

2 player

E Burns

No Correlation

0.08

1 player

S Kalis

2 player

B Heath

No Correlation

0.04

1 player

S Kalis

2 player

K Levick

No Correlation

-0.48

1 player

S Kalis

2 player

H Armitage

Negative Correlation

1

1 player

S Kalis

2 player

S Kalis

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.28

1 player

S Kalis

2 player

L Dobson

Weak Negative Correlation

0.07

1 player

S Kalis

2 player

R Slater

No Correlation

0.5

1 player

S Kalis

2 player

S Turner

Positive Correlation

0.12

1 player

S Kalis

2 player

K Fraser

No Correlation

0.33

1 player

L Dobson

2 player

E Marlow

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.56

1 player

L Dobson

2 player

E Burns

Negative Correlation

-0.18

1 player

L Dobson

2 player

B Heath

No Correlation

-0.04

1 player

L Dobson

2 player

K Levick

No Correlation

-0.12

1 player

L Dobson

2 player

H Armitage

No Correlation

-0.28

1 player

L Dobson

2 player

S Kalis

Weak Negative Correlation

1

1 player

L Dobson

2 player

L Dobson

Strong Positive Correlation

0.08

1 player

L Dobson

2 player

R Slater

No Correlation

-0.43

1 player

L Dobson

2 player

S Turner

Negative Correlation

0.07

1 player

L Dobson

2 player

K Fraser

No Correlation

-0.29

1 player

R Slater

2 player

E Marlow

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.11

1 player

R Slater

2 player

E Burns

No Correlation

-0.2

1 player

R Slater

2 player

B Heath

No Correlation

-0.06

1 player

R Slater

2 player

K Levick

No Correlation

0.18

1 player

R Slater

2 player

H Armitage

No Correlation

0.07

1 player

R Slater

2 player

S Kalis

No Correlation

0.08

1 player

R Slater

2 player

L Dobson

No Correlation

1

1 player

R Slater

2 player

R Slater

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.25

1 player

R Slater

2 player

S Turner

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.4

1 player

R Slater

2 player

K Fraser

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.25

1 player

S Turner

2 player

E Marlow

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.14

1 player

S Turner

2 player

E Burns

No Correlation

0

1 player

S Turner

2 player

B Heath

No Correlation

0.33

1 player

S Turner

2 player

K Levick

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.11

1 player

S Turner

2 player

H Armitage

No Correlation

0.5

1 player

S Turner

2 player

S Kalis

Positive Correlation

-0.43

1 player

S Turner

2 player

L Dobson

Negative Correlation

-0.25

1 player

S Turner

2 player

R Slater

Weak Negative Correlation

1

1 player

S Turner

2 player

S Turner

Strong Positive Correlation

0

1 player

S Turner

2 player

K Fraser

No Correlation

0.2

1 player

K Fraser

2 player

E Marlow

Weak Positive Correlation

0

1 player

K Fraser

2 player

E Burns

No Correlation

0.2

1 player

K Fraser

2 player

B Heath

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.12

1 player

K Fraser

2 player

K Levick

No Correlation

-0.12

1 player

K Fraser

2 player

H Armitage

No Correlation

0.12

1 player

K Fraser

2 player

S Kalis

No Correlation

0.07

1 player

K Fraser

2 player

L Dobson

No Correlation

-0.4

1 player

K Fraser

2 player

R Slater

Weak Negative Correlation

0

1 player

K Fraser

2 player

S Turner

No Correlation

1

1 player

K Fraser

2 player

K Fraser

Strong Positive Correlation

Strong Positive Correlation

No Correlation

Strong Negative Correlation

No data found

Pick **S Kalis** and **R Duckworth** together

Negative Correlation

Similar Perfomance

S Turner 0.33

S Kalis 0.04

Opposite Perfomance

E Marlow -0.38

H Armitage -0.17

K Fraser -0.12

R Slater -0.06

B Heath -0.04

L Dobson -0.04

Similar Perfomance

E Burns 0.2

R Slater 0.18

Opposite Perfomance

S Kalis -0.48

E Marlow -0.25

K Levick -0.17

B Heath -0.12

L Dobson -0.12

K Fraser -0.12

S Turner -0.11

Similar Perfomance

K Fraser 0.2

S Kalis 0.08

Opposite Perfomance

R Slater -0.2

L Dobson -0.18

H Armitage -0.12

K Levick -0.04

Similar Perfomance

S Turner 0.5

E Marlow 0.14

K Fraser 0.12

B Heath 0.08

R Slater 0.07

K Levick 0.04

Opposite Perfomance

H Armitage -0.48

L Dobson -0.28

Similar Perfomance

H Armitage 0.18

L Dobson 0.08

S Kalis 0.07

Opposite Perfomance

K Fraser -0.4

E Marlow -0.29

S Turner -0.25

B Heath -0.2

E Burns -0.11

K Levick -0.06