SVP 19 Jun 04:00 pm SES

Lineup Out

County Ground, Hove
Charlotte Edwards Cup

Best Player Combinations For
SVP vs SES

How it Works?

This guide is super useful for identifying player combinations that are likely to score big. Use the filters to identify the best player combinations according to specific match scenarios.

Player correlate positively

Both players generally perform similarly when picked together. They either score high together or score low together. Maximise FPts by picking players that correlate positively with top players.

Player correlate negatively

Both players generally perform in an opposite manner. If one player scores high, the other usually scores low. Avoid picking players that correlate negatively with top player

Show Player Combinations on the basis of:

Best SVP Player Combinations

Best SVP Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad
D Wyatt BAT SVP
L Smith BOW SVP
F Davies BAT SVP
C Knott AR SVP
R Southby WK SVP
G Adams AR SVP
C Dean BOW SVP
M Bouchier BAT SVP
E Windsor BAT SVP
F Kemp BOW SVP
M Taylor BOW SVP
D Wyatt
L Smith
F Davies
C Knott
R Southby
G Adams
C Dean
M Bouchier
E Windsor
F Kemp
M Taylor
1
1 player
D Wyatt
2 player
D Wyatt
Strong Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
D Wyatt
2 player
L Smith
Weak Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
D Wyatt
2 player
F Davies
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
D Wyatt
2 player
C Knott
Weak Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
D Wyatt
2 player
R Southby
No Correlation
0.44
1 player
D Wyatt
2 player
G Adams
Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
D Wyatt
2 player
C Dean
No Correlation
0.26
1 player
D Wyatt
2 player
M Bouchier
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
D Wyatt
2 player
E Windsor
No Correlation
0.32
1 player
D Wyatt
2 player
F Kemp
Weak Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
D Wyatt
2 player
M Taylor
No Correlation
0.22
1 player
L Smith
2 player
D Wyatt
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
L Smith
2 player
L Smith
Strong Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
L Smith
2 player
F Davies
Positive Correlation
0.37
1 player
L Smith
2 player
C Knott
Weak Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
L Smith
2 player
R Southby
Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
L Smith
2 player
G Adams
Weak Positive Correlation
0.37
1 player
L Smith
2 player
C Dean
Weak Positive Correlation
0.29
1 player
L Smith
2 player
M Bouchier
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.09
1 player
L Smith
2 player
E Windsor
No Correlation
0.12
1 player
L Smith
2 player
F Kemp
No Correlation
0.04
1 player
L Smith
2 player
M Taylor
No Correlation
0.32
1 player
F Davies
2 player
D Wyatt
Weak Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
F Davies
2 player
L Smith
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
F Davies
2 player
F Davies
Strong Positive Correlation
0.45
1 player
F Davies
2 player
C Knott
Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
F Davies
2 player
R Southby
Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
F Davies
2 player
G Adams
Weak Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
F Davies
2 player
C Dean
Weak Positive Correlation
0.48
1 player
F Davies
2 player
M Bouchier
Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
F Davies
2 player
E Windsor
No Correlation
0.3
1 player
F Davies
2 player
F Kemp
Weak Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
F Davies
2 player
M Taylor
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
C Knott
2 player
D Wyatt
Weak Positive Correlation
0.37
1 player
C Knott
2 player
L Smith
Weak Positive Correlation
0.45
1 player
C Knott
2 player
F Davies
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
C Knott
2 player
C Knott
Strong Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
C Knott
2 player
R Southby
Weak Positive Correlation
0.59
1 player
C Knott
2 player
G Adams
Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
C Knott
2 player
C Dean
Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
C Knott
2 player
M Bouchier
No Correlation
-0.23
1 player
C Knott
2 player
E Windsor
Weak Negative Correlation
0.32
1 player
C Knott
2 player
F Kemp
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
C Knott
2 player
M Taylor
Weak Negative Correlation
0.18
1 player
R Southby
2 player
D Wyatt
No Correlation
0.43
1 player
R Southby
2 player
L Smith
Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
R Southby
2 player
F Davies
Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
R Southby
2 player
C Knott
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
R Southby
2 player
R Southby
Strong Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
R Southby
2 player
G Adams
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.12
1 player
R Southby
2 player
C Dean
No Correlation
0.44
1 player
R Southby
2 player
M Bouchier
Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
R Southby
2 player
E Windsor
Weak Positive Correlation
0.59
1 player
R Southby
2 player
F Kemp
Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
R Southby
2 player
M Taylor
Weak Positive Correlation
0.44
1 player
G Adams
2 player
D Wyatt
Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
G Adams
2 player
L Smith
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
G Adams
2 player
F Davies
Weak Positive Correlation
0.59
1 player
G Adams
2 player
C Knott
Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
G Adams
2 player
R Southby
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
G Adams
2 player
G Adams
Strong Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
G Adams
2 player
C Dean
Positive Correlation
0.29
1 player
G Adams
2 player
M Bouchier
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.15
1 player
G Adams
2 player
E Windsor
No Correlation
0.12
1 player
G Adams
2 player
F Kemp
No Correlation
-0.3
1 player
G Adams
2 player
M Taylor
Weak Negative Correlation
0.17
1 player
C Dean
2 player
D Wyatt
No Correlation
0.37
1 player
C Dean
2 player
L Smith
Weak Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
C Dean
2 player
F Davies
Weak Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
C Dean
2 player
C Knott
Positive Correlation
-0.12
1 player
C Dean
2 player
R Southby
No Correlation
0.47
1 player
C Dean
2 player
G Adams
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
C Dean
2 player
C Dean
Strong Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
C Dean
2 player
M Bouchier
No Correlation
-0.47
1 player
C Dean
2 player
E Windsor
Negative Correlation
-0.01
1 player
C Dean
2 player
F Kemp
No Correlation
-0.47
1 player
C Dean
2 player
M Taylor
Negative Correlation
0.26
1 player
M Bouchier
2 player
D Wyatt
Weak Positive Correlation
0.29
1 player
M Bouchier
2 player
L Smith
Weak Positive Correlation
0.48
1 player
M Bouchier
2 player
F Davies
Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
M Bouchier
2 player
C Knott
No Correlation
0.44
1 player
M Bouchier
2 player
R Southby
Positive Correlation
0.29
1 player
M Bouchier
2 player
G Adams
Weak Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
M Bouchier
2 player
C Dean
No Correlation
1
1 player
M Bouchier
2 player
M Bouchier
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.05
1 player
M Bouchier
2 player
E Windsor
No Correlation
0.31
1 player
M Bouchier
2 player
F Kemp
Weak Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
M Bouchier
2 player
M Taylor
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
E Windsor
2 player
D Wyatt
No Correlation
-0.09
1 player
E Windsor
2 player
L Smith
No Correlation
0.1
1 player
E Windsor
2 player
F Davies
No Correlation
-0.23
1 player
E Windsor
2 player
C Knott
Weak Negative Correlation
0.36
1 player
E Windsor
2 player
R Southby
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.15
1 player
E Windsor
2 player
G Adams
No Correlation
-0.47
1 player
E Windsor
2 player
C Dean
Negative Correlation
-0.05
1 player
E Windsor
2 player
M Bouchier
No Correlation
1
1 player
E Windsor
2 player
E Windsor
Strong Positive Correlation
0.46
1 player
E Windsor
2 player
F Kemp
Positive Correlation
0.49
1 player
E Windsor
2 player
M Taylor
Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
F Kemp
2 player
D Wyatt
Weak Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
F Kemp
2 player
L Smith
No Correlation
0.3
1 player
F Kemp
2 player
F Davies
Weak Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
F Kemp
2 player
C Knott
Weak Positive Correlation
0.59
1 player
F Kemp
2 player
R Southby
Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
F Kemp
2 player
G Adams
No Correlation
-0.01
1 player
F Kemp
2 player
C Dean
No Correlation
0.31
1 player
F Kemp
2 player
M Bouchier
Weak Positive Correlation
0.46
1 player
F Kemp
2 player
E Windsor
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
F Kemp
2 player
F Kemp
Strong Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
F Kemp
2 player
M Taylor
Weak Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
M Taylor
2 player
D Wyatt
No Correlation
0.04
1 player
M Taylor
2 player
L Smith
No Correlation
0.3
1 player
M Taylor
2 player
F Davies
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
M Taylor
2 player
C Knott
Weak Negative Correlation
0.28
1 player
M Taylor
2 player
R Southby
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.3
1 player
M Taylor
2 player
G Adams
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.47
1 player
M Taylor
2 player
C Dean
Negative Correlation
0.08
1 player
M Taylor
2 player
M Bouchier
No Correlation
0.49
1 player
M Taylor
2 player
E Windsor
Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
M Taylor
2 player
F Kemp
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M Taylor
2 player
M Taylor
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

No data found

High Performing Players

1 G Adams

AR
Similar Perfomance
C Knott 0.59
C Dean 0.47
D Wyatt 0.44
L Smith 0.36
M Bouchier 0.29
F Davies 0.23
R Southby 0.22
F Kemp 0.12
Opposite Perfomance
M Taylor -0.3
E Windsor -0.15

2 C Dean

BOW
Similar Perfomance
G Adams 0.47
C Knott 0.42
L Smith 0.37
F Davies 0.22
M Bouchier 0.18
D Wyatt 0.17
Opposite Perfomance
E Windsor -0.47
M Taylor -0.47
R Southby -0.12
F Kemp -0.01

3 L Smith

BOW
Similar Perfomance
R Southby 0.43
F Davies 0.42
C Knott 0.37
C Dean 0.37
G Adams 0.36
M Bouchier 0.29
D Wyatt 0.22
F Kemp 0.12
M Taylor 0.04
Opposite Perfomance
E Windsor -0.09

4 D Wyatt

BAT
Similar Perfomance
G Adams 0.44
F Davies 0.32
F Kemp 0.32
M Bouchier 0.26
L Smith 0.22
C Knott 0.2
R Southby 0.18
C Dean 0.17
E Windsor 0.14
M Taylor 0.07

5 C Knott

AR
Similar Perfomance
G Adams 0.59
F Davies 0.45
C Dean 0.42
L Smith 0.37
F Kemp 0.32
R Southby 0.25
D Wyatt 0.2
M Bouchier 0.18
Opposite Perfomance
M Taylor -0.25
E Windsor -0.23

Best SES Player Combinations

Best SES Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad
K Moore AR SES
TC Coleman BOW SES
T Farrant AR SES
B Smith BAT SES
A Davidson-Richards AR SES
P Scholfield BAT SES
D Gregory BOW SES
C Hill WK SES
M Blinkhorn Jones BAT SES
A Stonehouse BOW SES
E Jones AR SES
K Moore
TC Coleman
T Farrant
B Smith
A Davidson-Richards
P Scholfield
D Gregory
C Hill
M Blinkhorn Jones
A Stonehouse
E Jones
1
1 player
K Moore
2 player
K Moore
Strong Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
K Moore
2 player
TC Coleman
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
K Moore
2 player
T Farrant
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.22
1 player
K Moore
2 player
B Smith
Weak Negative Correlation
0.49
1 player
K Moore
2 player
A Davidson-Richards
Positive Correlation
0.19
1 player
K Moore
2 player
P Scholfield
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
K Moore
2 player
D Gregory
No Correlation
0.49
1 player
K Moore
2 player
C Hill
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
K Moore
2 player
M Blinkhorn Jones
Positive Correlation
-0.06
1 player
K Moore
2 player
A Stonehouse
No Correlation
-0.23
1 player
K Moore
2 player
E Jones
Weak Negative Correlation
0.1
1 player
TC Coleman
2 player
K Moore
No Correlation
1
1 player
TC Coleman
2 player
TC Coleman
Strong Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
TC Coleman
2 player
T Farrant
Weak Positive Correlation
0.16
1 player
TC Coleman
2 player
B Smith
No Correlation
-0.17
1 player
TC Coleman
2 player
A Davidson-Richards
No Correlation
0.13
1 player
TC Coleman
2 player
P Scholfield
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
TC Coleman
2 player
D Gregory
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.07
1 player
TC Coleman
2 player
C Hill
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
TC Coleman
2 player
M Blinkhorn Jones
Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
TC Coleman
2 player
A Stonehouse
Weak Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
TC Coleman
2 player
E Jones
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
T Farrant
2 player
K Moore
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
T Farrant
2 player
TC Coleman
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
T Farrant
2 player
T Farrant
Strong Positive Correlation
0.04
1 player
T Farrant
2 player
B Smith
No Correlation
0.29
1 player
T Farrant
2 player
A Davidson-Richards
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
T Farrant
2 player
P Scholfield
Weak Positive Correlation
0.37
1 player
T Farrant
2 player
D Gregory
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.12
1 player
T Farrant
2 player
C Hill
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
T Farrant
2 player
M Blinkhorn Jones
Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
T Farrant
2 player
A Stonehouse
Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
T Farrant
2 player
E Jones
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.22
1 player
B Smith
2 player
K Moore
Weak Negative Correlation
0.16
1 player
B Smith
2 player
TC Coleman
No Correlation
0.04
1 player
B Smith
2 player
T Farrant
No Correlation
1
1 player
B Smith
2 player
B Smith
Strong Positive Correlation
0.19
1 player
B Smith
2 player
A Davidson-Richards
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
B Smith
2 player
P Scholfield
Weak Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
B Smith
2 player
D Gregory
No Correlation
0.15
1 player
B Smith
2 player
C Hill
No Correlation
0
1 player
B Smith
2 player
M Blinkhorn Jones
No Correlation
-0.21
1 player
B Smith
2 player
A Stonehouse
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.38
1 player
B Smith
2 player
E Jones
Weak Negative Correlation
0.49
1 player
A Davidson-Richards
2 player
K Moore
Positive Correlation
-0.17
1 player
A Davidson-Richards
2 player
TC Coleman
No Correlation
0.29
1 player
A Davidson-Richards
2 player
T Farrant
Weak Positive Correlation
0.19
1 player
A Davidson-Richards
2 player
B Smith
No Correlation
1
1 player
A Davidson-Richards
2 player
A Davidson-Richards
Strong Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
A Davidson-Richards
2 player
P Scholfield
Weak Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
A Davidson-Richards
2 player
D Gregory
Weak Positive Correlation
0.62
1 player
A Davidson-Richards
2 player
C Hill
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
A Davidson-Richards
2 player
M Blinkhorn Jones
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.09
1 player
A Davidson-Richards
2 player
A Stonehouse
No Correlation
0.09
1 player
A Davidson-Richards
2 player
E Jones
No Correlation
0.19
1 player
P Scholfield
2 player
K Moore
No Correlation
0.13
1 player
P Scholfield
2 player
TC Coleman
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
P Scholfield
2 player
T Farrant
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
P Scholfield
2 player
B Smith
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
P Scholfield
2 player
A Davidson-Richards
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
P Scholfield
2 player
P Scholfield
Strong Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
P Scholfield
2 player
D Gregory
Weak Positive Correlation
0.06
1 player
P Scholfield
2 player
C Hill
No Correlation
1
1 player
P Scholfield
2 player
M Blinkhorn Jones
Strong Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
P Scholfield
2 player
A Stonehouse
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
P Scholfield
2 player
E Jones
Weak Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
D Gregory
2 player
K Moore
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
D Gregory
2 player
TC Coleman
Weak Positive Correlation
0.37
1 player
D Gregory
2 player
T Farrant
Weak Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
D Gregory
2 player
B Smith
No Correlation
0.27
1 player
D Gregory
2 player
A Davidson-Richards
Weak Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
D Gregory
2 player
P Scholfield
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
D Gregory
2 player
D Gregory
Strong Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
D Gregory
2 player
C Hill
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
D Gregory
2 player
M Blinkhorn Jones
Strong Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
D Gregory
2 player
A Stonehouse
Weak Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
D Gregory
2 player
E Jones
Positive Correlation
0.49
1 player
C Hill
2 player
K Moore
Positive Correlation
-0.07
1 player
C Hill
2 player
TC Coleman
No Correlation
-0.12
1 player
C Hill
2 player
T Farrant
No Correlation
0.15
1 player
C Hill
2 player
B Smith
No Correlation
0.62
1 player
C Hill
2 player
A Davidson-Richards
Positive Correlation
0.06
1 player
C Hill
2 player
P Scholfield
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
C Hill
2 player
D Gregory
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
C Hill
2 player
C Hill
Strong Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
C Hill
2 player
M Blinkhorn Jones
Positive Correlation
0.01
1 player
C Hill
2 player
A Stonehouse
No Correlation
-0.15
1 player
C Hill
2 player
E Jones
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Blinkhorn Jones
2 player
K Moore
Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
M Blinkhorn Jones
2 player
TC Coleman
Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
M Blinkhorn Jones
2 player
T Farrant
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
M Blinkhorn Jones
2 player
B Smith
No Correlation
1
1 player
M Blinkhorn Jones
2 player
A Davidson-Richards
Strong Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M Blinkhorn Jones
2 player
P Scholfield
Strong Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M Blinkhorn Jones
2 player
D Gregory
Strong Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Blinkhorn Jones
2 player
C Hill
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M Blinkhorn Jones
2 player
M Blinkhorn Jones
Strong Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Blinkhorn Jones
2 player
A Stonehouse
Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
M Blinkhorn Jones
2 player
E Jones
Positive Correlation
-0.06
1 player
A Stonehouse
2 player
K Moore
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
A Stonehouse
2 player
TC Coleman
Weak Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
A Stonehouse
2 player
T Farrant
Positive Correlation
-0.21
1 player
A Stonehouse
2 player
B Smith
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.09
1 player
A Stonehouse
2 player
A Davidson-Richards
No Correlation
0.36
1 player
A Stonehouse
2 player
P Scholfield
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
A Stonehouse
2 player
D Gregory
Weak Positive Correlation
0.01
1 player
A Stonehouse
2 player
C Hill
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
A Stonehouse
2 player
M Blinkhorn Jones
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
A Stonehouse
2 player
A Stonehouse
Strong Positive Correlation
0.55
1 player
A Stonehouse
2 player
E Jones
Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
E Jones
2 player
K Moore
Weak Negative Correlation
0.26
1 player
E Jones
2 player
TC Coleman
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
E Jones
2 player
T Farrant
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.38
1 player
E Jones
2 player
B Smith
Weak Negative Correlation
0.09
1 player
E Jones
2 player
A Davidson-Richards
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
E Jones
2 player
P Scholfield
Weak Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
E Jones
2 player
D Gregory
Positive Correlation
-0.15
1 player
E Jones
2 player
C Hill
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
E Jones
2 player
M Blinkhorn Jones
Positive Correlation
0.55
1 player
E Jones
2 player
A Stonehouse
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
E Jones
2 player
E Jones
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick K Moore and M Blinkhorn Jones together
Positive Correlation

Pick A Davidson-Richards and C Hill together
Positive Correlation

Pick A Davidson-Richards and M Blinkhorn Jones together
Strong Positive Correlation

Pick P Scholfield and M Blinkhorn Jones together
Strong Positive Correlation

Pick D Gregory and M Blinkhorn Jones together
Strong Positive Correlation

Pick C Hill and M Blinkhorn Jones together
Positive Correlation

Pick M Blinkhorn Jones and A Stonehouse together
Positive Correlation

High Performing Players

1 B Smith

BAT
Similar Perfomance
P Scholfield 0.2
A Davidson-Richards 0.19
D Gregory 0.18
TC Coleman 0.16
C Hill 0.15
T Farrant 0.04
Opposite Perfomance
E Jones -0.38
K Moore -0.22
A Stonehouse -0.21

2 D Gregory

BOW
Similar Perfomance
M Blinkhorn Jones 1
E Jones 0.4
P Scholfield 0.39
T Farrant 0.37
A Davidson-Richards 0.27
A Stonehouse 0.23
TC Coleman 0.2
C Hill 0.2
B Smith 0.18
K Moore 0.11

3 A Davidson-Richards

AR
Similar Perfomance
M Blinkhorn Jones 1
C Hill 0.62
K Moore 0.49
T Farrant 0.29
D Gregory 0.27
P Scholfield 0.23
B Smith 0.19
E Jones 0.09
Opposite Perfomance
TC Coleman -0.17
A Stonehouse -0.09

4 P Scholfield

BAT
Similar Perfomance
M Blinkhorn Jones 1
D Gregory 0.39
A Stonehouse 0.36
T Farrant 0.35
E Jones 0.33
A Davidson-Richards 0.23
B Smith 0.2
K Moore 0.19
TC Coleman 0.13
C Hill 0.06

5 TC Coleman

BOW
Similar Perfomance
M Blinkhorn Jones 0.4
A Stonehouse 0.28
E Jones 0.26
T Farrant 0.2
D Gregory 0.2
B Smith 0.16
P Scholfield 0.13
K Moore 0.1
Opposite Perfomance
A Davidson-Richards -0.17
C Hill -0.07

Best SVP Player Combinations

Best SVP Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad
D Wyatt BAT SVP
L Smith BOW SVP
F Davies BAT SVP
C Knott AR SVP
R Southby WK SVP
G Adams AR SVP
C Dean BOW SVP
M Bouchier BAT SVP
E Windsor BAT SVP
F Kemp BOW SVP
M Taylor BOW SVP
D Wyatt
L Smith
F Davies
C Knott
R Southby
G Adams
C Dean
M Bouchier
E Windsor
F Kemp
M Taylor
1
1 player
D Wyatt
2 player
D Wyatt
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.17
1 player
D Wyatt
2 player
L Smith
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
D Wyatt
2 player
F Davies
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
D Wyatt
2 player
C Knott
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
D Wyatt
2 player
R Southby
Weak Negative Correlation
0.38
1 player
D Wyatt
2 player
G Adams
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
D Wyatt
2 player
C Dean
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
D Wyatt
2 player
M Bouchier
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
D Wyatt
2 player
E Windsor
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
D Wyatt
2 player
F Kemp
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
D Wyatt
2 player
M Taylor
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.17
1 player
L Smith
2 player
D Wyatt
No Correlation
1
1 player
L Smith
2 player
L Smith
Strong Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
L Smith
2 player
F Davies
Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
L Smith
2 player
C Knott
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
L Smith
2 player
R Southby
Weak Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
L Smith
2 player
G Adams
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
L Smith
2 player
C Dean
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
L Smith
2 player
M Bouchier
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.43
1 player
L Smith
2 player
E Windsor
Negative Correlation
-0.38
1 player
L Smith
2 player
F Kemp
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.4
1 player
L Smith
2 player
M Taylor
Weak Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
F Davies
2 player
D Wyatt
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
F Davies
2 player
L Smith
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
F Davies
2 player
F Davies
Strong Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
F Davies
2 player
C Knott
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
F Davies
2 player
R Southby
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
F Davies
2 player
G Adams
No Correlation
0
1 player
F Davies
2 player
C Dean
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
F Davies
2 player
M Bouchier
Positive Correlation
-0.5
1 player
F Davies
2 player
E Windsor
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
F Davies
2 player
F Kemp
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
F Davies
2 player
M Taylor
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
C Knott
2 player
D Wyatt
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
C Knott
2 player
L Smith
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
C Knott
2 player
F Davies
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
C Knott
2 player
C Knott
Strong Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
C Knott
2 player
R Southby
No Correlation
0.6
1 player
C Knott
2 player
G Adams
Positive Correlation
0.67
1 player
C Knott
2 player
C Dean
Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
C Knott
2 player
M Bouchier
No Correlation
-0.71
1 player
C Knott
2 player
E Windsor
Negative Correlation
0.11
1 player
C Knott
2 player
F Kemp
No Correlation
-0.67
1 player
C Knott
2 player
M Taylor
Negative Correlation
-0.35
1 player
R Southby
2 player
D Wyatt
Weak Negative Correlation
0.2
1 player
R Southby
2 player
L Smith
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
R Southby
2 player
F Davies
Weak Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
R Southby
2 player
C Knott
No Correlation
1
1 player
R Southby
2 player
R Southby
Strong Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
R Southby
2 player
G Adams
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
R Southby
2 player
C Dean
Weak Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
R Southby
2 player
M Bouchier
Positive Correlation
-0.71
1 player
R Southby
2 player
E Windsor
Negative Correlation
0.78
1 player
R Southby
2 player
F Kemp
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
R Southby
2 player
M Taylor
No Correlation
0.38
1 player
G Adams
2 player
D Wyatt
Weak Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
G Adams
2 player
L Smith
No Correlation
0
1 player
G Adams
2 player
F Davies
No Correlation
0.6
1 player
G Adams
2 player
C Knott
Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
G Adams
2 player
R Southby
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
G Adams
2 player
G Adams
Strong Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
G Adams
2 player
C Dean
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
G Adams
2 player
M Bouchier
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.65
1 player
G Adams
2 player
E Windsor
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
G Adams
2 player
F Kemp
No Correlation
-0.8
1 player
G Adams
2 player
M Taylor
Negative Correlation
0.23
1 player
C Dean
2 player
D Wyatt
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
C Dean
2 player
L Smith
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
C Dean
2 player
F Davies
No Correlation
0.67
1 player
C Dean
2 player
C Knott
Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
C Dean
2 player
R Southby
Weak Negative Correlation
0.38
1 player
C Dean
2 player
G Adams
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
C Dean
2 player
C Dean
Strong Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
C Dean
2 player
M Bouchier
No Correlation
-0.67
1 player
C Dean
2 player
E Windsor
Negative Correlation
-0.09
1 player
C Dean
2 player
F Kemp
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
C Dean
2 player
M Taylor
Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
M Bouchier
2 player
D Wyatt
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
M Bouchier
2 player
L Smith
Weak Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
M Bouchier
2 player
F Davies
Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
M Bouchier
2 player
C Knott
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Bouchier
2 player
R Southby
Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
M Bouchier
2 player
G Adams
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
M Bouchier
2 player
C Dean
No Correlation
1
1 player
M Bouchier
2 player
M Bouchier
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
M Bouchier
2 player
E Windsor
Weak Negative Correlation
0.47
1 player
M Bouchier
2 player
F Kemp
Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
M Bouchier
2 player
M Taylor
Weak Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
E Windsor
2 player
D Wyatt
No Correlation
-0.43
1 player
E Windsor
2 player
L Smith
Negative Correlation
-0.5
1 player
E Windsor
2 player
F Davies
Negative Correlation
-0.71
1 player
E Windsor
2 player
C Knott
Negative Correlation
-0.71
1 player
E Windsor
2 player
R Southby
Negative Correlation
-0.65
1 player
E Windsor
2 player
G Adams
Negative Correlation
-0.67
1 player
E Windsor
2 player
C Dean
Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
E Windsor
2 player
M Bouchier
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
E Windsor
2 player
E Windsor
Strong Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
E Windsor
2 player
F Kemp
Weak Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
E Windsor
2 player
M Taylor
Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
F Kemp
2 player
D Wyatt
No Correlation
-0.38
1 player
F Kemp
2 player
L Smith
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
F Kemp
2 player
F Davies
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
F Kemp
2 player
C Knott
No Correlation
0.78
1 player
F Kemp
2 player
R Southby
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
F Kemp
2 player
G Adams
No Correlation
-0.09
1 player
F Kemp
2 player
C Dean
No Correlation
0.47
1 player
F Kemp
2 player
M Bouchier
Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
F Kemp
2 player
E Windsor
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
F Kemp
2 player
F Kemp
Strong Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
F Kemp
2 player
M Taylor
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
M Taylor
2 player
D Wyatt
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.4
1 player
M Taylor
2 player
L Smith
Weak Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
M Taylor
2 player
F Davies
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.67
1 player
M Taylor
2 player
C Knott
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
M Taylor
2 player
R Southby
No Correlation
-0.8
1 player
M Taylor
2 player
G Adams
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
M Taylor
2 player
C Dean
Negative Correlation
-0.35
1 player
M Taylor
2 player
M Bouchier
Weak Negative Correlation
0.4
1 player
M Taylor
2 player
E Windsor
Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
M Taylor
2 player
F Kemp
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M Taylor
2 player
M Taylor
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick C Knott and G Adams together
Positive Correlation

Pick C Knott and C Dean together
Positive Correlation

Pick R Southby and M Bouchier together
Positive Correlation

Pick R Southby and F Kemp together
Positive Correlation

Pick C Knott and E Windsor together
Negative Correlation

Pick C Knott and M Taylor together
Negative Correlation

Pick R Southby and E Windsor together
Negative Correlation

Pick G Adams and E Windsor together
Negative Correlation

Pick G Adams and M Taylor together
Negative Correlation

Pick C Dean and E Windsor together
Negative Correlation

Pick C Dean and M Taylor together
Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 G Adams

AR
Similar Perfomance
C Knott 0.6
D Wyatt 0.38
C Dean 0.38
M Bouchier 0.33
R Southby 0.2
L Smith 0.18
Opposite Perfomance
M Taylor -0.8
E Windsor -0.65

2 L Smith

BOW
Similar Perfomance
F Davies 0.4
C Dean 0.33
M Bouchier 0.23
C Knott 0.2
R Southby 0.2
G Adams 0.18
Opposite Perfomance
E Windsor -0.43
M Taylor -0.4
F Kemp -0.38
D Wyatt -0.17

3 C Dean

BOW
Similar Perfomance
C Knott 0.67
G Adams 0.38
L Smith 0.33
D Wyatt 0.23
M Bouchier 0.14
Opposite Perfomance
M Taylor -0.7
E Windsor -0.67
R Southby -0.33
F Kemp -0.09

4 D Wyatt

BAT
Similar Perfomance
G Adams 0.38
C Knott 0.35
M Bouchier 0.33
C Dean 0.23
M Taylor 0.23
F Davies 0.14
E Windsor 0.14
F Kemp 0.08
Opposite Perfomance
R Southby -0.35
L Smith -0.17

5 M Bouchier

BAT
Similar Perfomance
R Southby 0.7
F Kemp 0.47
F Davies 0.42
D Wyatt 0.33
G Adams 0.33
L Smith 0.23
C Dean 0.14
Opposite Perfomance
M Taylor -0.35
E Windsor -0.33
C Knott -0.14

Best SES Player Combinations

Best SES Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad
K Moore AR SES
TC Coleman BOW SES
T Farrant AR SES
B Smith BAT SES
A Davidson-Richards AR SES
P Scholfield BAT SES
D Gregory BOW SES
C Hill WK SES
M Blinkhorn Jones BAT SES
A Stonehouse BOW SES
E Jones AR SES
K Moore
TC Coleman
T Farrant
B Smith
A Davidson-Richards
P Scholfield
D Gregory
C Hill
M Blinkhorn Jones
A Stonehouse
E Jones
1
1 player
K Moore
2 player
K Moore
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
K Moore
2 player
TC Coleman
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
K Moore
2 player
T Farrant
No Correlation
-0.5
1 player
K Moore
2 player
B Smith
Negative Correlation
0.71
1 player
K Moore
2 player
A Davidson-Richards
Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
K Moore
2 player
P Scholfield
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.17
1 player
K Moore
2 player
D Gregory
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
K Moore
2 player
C Hill
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
K Moore
2 player
M Blinkhorn Jones
Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
K Moore
2 player
A Stonehouse
No Correlation
-0.23
1 player
K Moore
2 player
E Jones
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
TC Coleman
2 player
K Moore
No Correlation
1
1 player
TC Coleman
2 player
TC Coleman
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
TC Coleman
2 player
T Farrant
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
TC Coleman
2 player
B Smith
No Correlation
-0.67
1 player
TC Coleman
2 player
A Davidson-Richards
Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
TC Coleman
2 player
P Scholfield
No Correlation
-0.11
1 player
TC Coleman
2 player
D Gregory
No Correlation
0
1 player
TC Coleman
2 player
C Hill
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
TC Coleman
2 player
M Blinkhorn Jones
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
TC Coleman
2 player
A Stonehouse
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
TC Coleman
2 player
E Jones
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
T Farrant
2 player
K Moore
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
T Farrant
2 player
TC Coleman
No Correlation
1
1 player
T Farrant
2 player
T Farrant
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
T Farrant
2 player
B Smith
Weak Negative Correlation
0.4
1 player
T Farrant
2 player
A Davidson-Richards
Positive Correlation
-0.5
1 player
T Farrant
2 player
P Scholfield
Negative Correlation
0.2
1 player
T Farrant
2 player
D Gregory
Weak Positive Correlation
-1
1 player
T Farrant
2 player
C Hill
Strong Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
T Farrant
2 player
M Blinkhorn Jones
Negative Correlation
0.42
1 player
T Farrant
2 player
A Stonehouse
Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
T Farrant
2 player
E Jones
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.5
1 player
B Smith
2 player
K Moore
Negative Correlation
0.11
1 player
B Smith
2 player
TC Coleman
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
B Smith
2 player
T Farrant
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
B Smith
2 player
B Smith
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.13
1 player
B Smith
2 player
A Davidson-Richards
No Correlation
0
1 player
B Smith
2 player
P Scholfield
No Correlation
-0.11
1 player
B Smith
2 player
D Gregory
No Correlation
-0.2
1 player
B Smith
2 player
C Hill
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
B Smith
2 player
M Blinkhorn Jones
Negative Correlation
-0.41
1 player
B Smith
2 player
A Stonehouse
Negative Correlation
-0.4
1 player
B Smith
2 player
E Jones
Weak Negative Correlation
0.71
1 player
A Davidson-Richards
2 player
K Moore
Positive Correlation
-0.67
1 player
A Davidson-Richards
2 player
TC Coleman
Negative Correlation
0.4
1 player
A Davidson-Richards
2 player
T Farrant
Positive Correlation
-0.13
1 player
A Davidson-Richards
2 player
B Smith
No Correlation
1
1 player
A Davidson-Richards
2 player
A Davidson-Richards
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
A Davidson-Richards
2 player
P Scholfield
No Correlation
-0.09
1 player
A Davidson-Richards
2 player
D Gregory
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
A Davidson-Richards
2 player
C Hill
Weak Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
A Davidson-Richards
2 player
M Blinkhorn Jones
Positive Correlation
-0.43
1 player
A Davidson-Richards
2 player
A Stonehouse
Negative Correlation
-0.2
1 player
A Davidson-Richards
2 player
E Jones
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
P Scholfield
2 player
K Moore
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
P Scholfield
2 player
TC Coleman
No Correlation
-0.5
1 player
P Scholfield
2 player
T Farrant
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
P Scholfield
2 player
B Smith
No Correlation
0
1 player
P Scholfield
2 player
A Davidson-Richards
No Correlation
1
1 player
P Scholfield
2 player
P Scholfield
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.12
1 player
P Scholfield
2 player
D Gregory
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
P Scholfield
2 player
C Hill
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
P Scholfield
2 player
M Blinkhorn Jones
Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
P Scholfield
2 player
A Stonehouse
Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
P Scholfield
2 player
E Jones
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.17
1 player
D Gregory
2 player
K Moore
No Correlation
-0.11
1 player
D Gregory
2 player
TC Coleman
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
D Gregory
2 player
T Farrant
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.11
1 player
D Gregory
2 player
B Smith
No Correlation
-0.09
1 player
D Gregory
2 player
A Davidson-Richards
No Correlation
-0.12
1 player
D Gregory
2 player
P Scholfield
No Correlation
1
1 player
D Gregory
2 player
D Gregory
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.4
1 player
D Gregory
2 player
C Hill
Weak Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
D Gregory
2 player
M Blinkhorn Jones
Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
D Gregory
2 player
A Stonehouse
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
D Gregory
2 player
E Jones
Weak Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
C Hill
2 player
K Moore
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
C Hill
2 player
TC Coleman
No Correlation
-1
1 player
C Hill
2 player
T Farrant
Strong Negative Correlation
-0.2
1 player
C Hill
2 player
B Smith
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
C Hill
2 player
A Davidson-Richards
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
C Hill
2 player
P Scholfield
No Correlation
-0.4
1 player
C Hill
2 player
D Gregory
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
C Hill
2 player
C Hill
Strong Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
C Hill
2 player
M Blinkhorn Jones
Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
C Hill
2 player
A Stonehouse
No Correlation
0
1 player
C Hill
2 player
E Jones
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Blinkhorn Jones
2 player
K Moore
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
M Blinkhorn Jones
2 player
TC Coleman
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
M Blinkhorn Jones
2 player
T Farrant
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
M Blinkhorn Jones
2 player
B Smith
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Blinkhorn Jones
2 player
A Davidson-Richards
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Blinkhorn Jones
2 player
P Scholfield
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Blinkhorn Jones
2 player
D Gregory
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Blinkhorn Jones
2 player
C Hill
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M Blinkhorn Jones
2 player
M Blinkhorn Jones
Strong Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Blinkhorn Jones
2 player
A Stonehouse
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Blinkhorn Jones
2 player
E Jones
Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
A Stonehouse
2 player
K Moore
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Stonehouse
2 player
TC Coleman
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
A Stonehouse
2 player
T Farrant
Positive Correlation
-0.41
1 player
A Stonehouse
2 player
B Smith
Negative Correlation
-0.43
1 player
A Stonehouse
2 player
A Davidson-Richards
Negative Correlation
0.43
1 player
A Stonehouse
2 player
P Scholfield
Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
A Stonehouse
2 player
D Gregory
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
A Stonehouse
2 player
C Hill
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
A Stonehouse
2 player
M Blinkhorn Jones
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
A Stonehouse
2 player
A Stonehouse
Strong Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
A Stonehouse
2 player
E Jones
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
E Jones
2 player
K Moore
Weak Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
E Jones
2 player
TC Coleman
No Correlation
-0.23
1 player
E Jones
2 player
T Farrant
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.4
1 player
E Jones
2 player
B Smith
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.2
1 player
E Jones
2 player
A Davidson-Richards
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
E Jones
2 player
P Scholfield
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
E Jones
2 player
D Gregory
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
E Jones
2 player
C Hill
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
E Jones
2 player
M Blinkhorn Jones
Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
E Jones
2 player
A Stonehouse
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
E Jones
2 player
E Jones
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick K Moore and A Davidson-Richards together
Positive Correlation

Pick M Blinkhorn Jones and E Jones together
Positive Correlation

Pick TC Coleman and A Davidson-Richards together
Negative Correlation

Pick TC Coleman and M Blinkhorn Jones together
Negative Correlation

Pick T Farrant and C Hill together
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick T Farrant and M Blinkhorn Jones together
Negative Correlation

Pick B Smith and M Blinkhorn Jones together
Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 B Smith

BAT
Similar Perfomance
TC Coleman 0.11
Opposite Perfomance
M Blinkhorn Jones -0.7
K Moore -0.5
A Stonehouse -0.41
E Jones -0.4
T Farrant -0.33
C Hill -0.2
A Davidson-Richards -0.13
D Gregory -0.11

2 D Gregory

BOW
Similar Perfomance
M Blinkhorn Jones 0.7
E Jones 0.33
T Farrant 0.2
A Stonehouse 0.12
Opposite Perfomance
C Hill -0.4
K Moore -0.17
P Scholfield -0.12
TC Coleman -0.11
B Smith -0.11
A Davidson-Richards -0.09

3 A Davidson-Richards

AR
Similar Perfomance
K Moore 0.71
M Blinkhorn Jones 0.7
T Farrant 0.4
C Hill 0.33
Opposite Perfomance
TC Coleman -0.67
A Stonehouse -0.43
E Jones -0.2
B Smith -0.13
D Gregory -0.09

4 P Scholfield

BAT
Similar Perfomance
M Blinkhorn Jones 0.7
A Stonehouse 0.43
E Jones 0.23
K Moore 0.2
TC Coleman 0.14
C Hill 0.14
Opposite Perfomance
T Farrant -0.5
D Gregory -0.12

5 TC Coleman

BOW
Similar Perfomance
E Jones 0.14
P Scholfield 0.14
B Smith 0.11
Opposite Perfomance
M Blinkhorn Jones -0.7
A Davidson-Richards -0.67
K Moore -0.14
T Farrant -0.14
D Gregory -0.11

PerfectLineup © 2024. All Rights Reserved