SVP vs SES

This guide is super useful for identifying player combinations that are likely to score big. Use the filters to identify the best player combinations according to specific match scenarios.

Both players generally perform similarly when picked together. They either score high together or score low together. Maximise FPts by picking players that correlate positively with top players.

Both players generally perform in an opposite manner. If one player scores high, the other usually scores low. Avoid picking players that correlate negatively with top player

Show Player Combinations on the basis of:

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

D Wyatt BAT SVP

L Smith BOW SVP

F Davies BAT SVP

C Knott AR SVP

R Southby WK SVP

G Adams AR SVP

C Dean BOW SVP

M Bouchier BAT SVP

E Windsor BAT SVP

F Kemp BOW SVP

M Taylor BOW SVP

D Wyatt

L Smith

F Davies

C Knott

R Southby

G Adams

C Dean

M Bouchier

E Windsor

F Kemp

M Taylor

1

1 player

D Wyatt

2 player

D Wyatt

Strong Positive Correlation

0.22

1 player

D Wyatt

2 player

L Smith

Weak Positive Correlation

0.32

1 player

D Wyatt

2 player

F Davies

Weak Positive Correlation

0.2

1 player

D Wyatt

2 player

C Knott

Weak Positive Correlation

0.18

1 player

D Wyatt

2 player

R Southby

No Correlation

0.44

1 player

D Wyatt

2 player

G Adams

Positive Correlation

0.17

1 player

D Wyatt

2 player

C Dean

No Correlation

0.26

1 player

D Wyatt

2 player

M Bouchier

Weak Positive Correlation

0.32

1 player

D Wyatt

2 player

F Kemp

Weak Positive Correlation

0.22

1 player

L Smith

2 player

D Wyatt

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

L Smith

2 player

L Smith

Strong Positive Correlation

0.42

1 player

L Smith

2 player

F Davies

Positive Correlation

0.37

1 player

L Smith

2 player

C Knott

Weak Positive Correlation

0.43

1 player

L Smith

2 player

R Southby

Positive Correlation

0.36

1 player

L Smith

2 player

G Adams

Weak Positive Correlation

0.37

1 player

L Smith

2 player

C Dean

Weak Positive Correlation

0.29

1 player

L Smith

2 player

M Bouchier

Weak Positive Correlation

0.12

1 player

L Smith

2 player

F Kemp

No Correlation

0.32

1 player

F Davies

2 player

D Wyatt

Weak Positive Correlation

0.42

1 player

F Davies

2 player

L Smith

Positive Correlation

1

1 player

F Davies

2 player

F Davies

Strong Positive Correlation

0.45

1 player

F Davies

2 player

C Knott

Positive Correlation

0.43

1 player

F Davies

2 player

R Southby

Positive Correlation

0.23

1 player

F Davies

2 player

G Adams

Weak Positive Correlation

0.22

1 player

F Davies

2 player

C Dean

Weak Positive Correlation

0.48

1 player

F Davies

2 player

M Bouchier

Positive Correlation

0.3

1 player

F Davies

2 player

F Kemp

Weak Positive Correlation

0.2

1 player

C Knott

2 player

D Wyatt

Weak Positive Correlation

0.37

1 player

C Knott

2 player

L Smith

Weak Positive Correlation

0.45

1 player

C Knott

2 player

F Davies

Positive Correlation

1

1 player

C Knott

2 player

C Knott

Strong Positive Correlation

0.25

1 player

C Knott

2 player

R Southby

Weak Positive Correlation

0.59

1 player

C Knott

2 player

G Adams

Positive Correlation

0.42

1 player

C Knott

2 player

C Dean

Positive Correlation

0.18

1 player

C Knott

2 player

M Bouchier

No Correlation

0.32

1 player

C Knott

2 player

F Kemp

Weak Positive Correlation

0.18

1 player

R Southby

2 player

D Wyatt

No Correlation

0.43

1 player

R Southby

2 player

L Smith

Positive Correlation

0.43

1 player

R Southby

2 player

F Davies

Positive Correlation

0.25

1 player

R Southby

2 player

C Knott

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

R Southby

2 player

R Southby

Strong Positive Correlation

0.22

1 player

R Southby

2 player

G Adams

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.12

1 player

R Southby

2 player

C Dean

No Correlation

0.44

1 player

R Southby

2 player

M Bouchier

Positive Correlation

0.59

1 player

R Southby

2 player

F Kemp

Positive Correlation

0.44

1 player

G Adams

2 player

D Wyatt

Positive Correlation

0.36

1 player

G Adams

2 player

L Smith

Weak Positive Correlation

0.23

1 player

G Adams

2 player

F Davies

Weak Positive Correlation

0.59

1 player

G Adams

2 player

C Knott

Positive Correlation

0.22

1 player

G Adams

2 player

R Southby

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

G Adams

2 player

G Adams

Strong Positive Correlation

0.47

1 player

G Adams

2 player

C Dean

Positive Correlation

0.29

1 player

G Adams

2 player

M Bouchier

Weak Positive Correlation

0.12

1 player

G Adams

2 player

F Kemp

No Correlation

0.17

1 player

C Dean

2 player

D Wyatt

No Correlation

0.37

1 player

C Dean

2 player

L Smith

Weak Positive Correlation

0.22

1 player

C Dean

2 player

F Davies

Weak Positive Correlation

0.42

1 player

C Dean

2 player

C Knott

Positive Correlation

-0.12

1 player

C Dean

2 player

R Southby

No Correlation

0.47

1 player

C Dean

2 player

G Adams

Positive Correlation

1

1 player

C Dean

2 player

C Dean

Strong Positive Correlation

0.18

1 player

C Dean

2 player

M Bouchier

No Correlation

-0.01

1 player

C Dean

2 player

F Kemp

No Correlation

0.26

1 player

M Bouchier

2 player

D Wyatt

Weak Positive Correlation

0.29

1 player

M Bouchier

2 player

L Smith

Weak Positive Correlation

0.48

1 player

M Bouchier

2 player

F Davies

Positive Correlation

0.18

1 player

M Bouchier

2 player

C Knott

No Correlation

0.44

1 player

M Bouchier

2 player

R Southby

Positive Correlation

0.29

1 player

M Bouchier

2 player

G Adams

Weak Positive Correlation

0.18

1 player

M Bouchier

2 player

C Dean

No Correlation

1

1 player

M Bouchier

2 player

M Bouchier

Strong Positive Correlation

0.31

1 player

M Bouchier

2 player

F Kemp

Weak Positive Correlation

0.32

1 player

F Kemp

2 player

D Wyatt

Weak Positive Correlation

0.12

1 player

F Kemp

2 player

L Smith

No Correlation

0.3

1 player

F Kemp

2 player

F Davies

Weak Positive Correlation

0.32

1 player

F Kemp

2 player

C Knott

Weak Positive Correlation

0.59

1 player

F Kemp

2 player

R Southby

Positive Correlation

0.12

1 player

F Kemp

2 player

G Adams

No Correlation

-0.01

1 player

F Kemp

2 player

C Dean

No Correlation

0.31

1 player

F Kemp

2 player

M Bouchier

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

F Kemp

2 player

F Kemp

Strong Positive Correlation

Strong Positive Correlation

No Correlation

Strong Negative Correlation

No data found

Similar Perfomance

C Knott 0.59

C Dean 0.47

D Wyatt 0.44

L Smith 0.36

M Bouchier 0.29

F Davies 0.23

R Southby 0.22

F Kemp 0.12

Opposite Perfomance

Similar Perfomance

G Adams 0.47

C Knott 0.42

L Smith 0.37

F Davies 0.22

M Bouchier 0.18

D Wyatt 0.17

Opposite Perfomance

R Southby -0.12

F Kemp -0.01

Similar Perfomance

R Southby 0.43

F Davies 0.42

C Knott 0.37

C Dean 0.37

G Adams 0.36

M Bouchier 0.29

D Wyatt 0.22

F Kemp 0.12

Opposite Perfomance

Similar Perfomance

G Adams 0.44

F Davies 0.32

F Kemp 0.32

M Bouchier 0.26

L Smith 0.22

C Knott 0.2

R Southby 0.18

C Dean 0.17

Similar Perfomance

G Adams 0.59

F Davies 0.45

C Dean 0.42

L Smith 0.37

F Kemp 0.32

R Southby 0.25

D Wyatt 0.2

M Bouchier 0.18

Opposite Perfomance

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

K Moore AR SES

TC Coleman BOW SES

T Farrant AR SES

B Smith BAT SES

A Davidson-Richards AR SES

P Scholfield BAT SES

D Gregory BOW SES

C Hill WK SES

M Blinkhorn Jones BAT SES

A Stonehouse BOW SES

E Jones AR SES

K Moore

TC Coleman

T Farrant

B Smith

A Davidson-Richards

P Scholfield

D Gregory

C Hill

M Blinkhorn Jones

A Stonehouse

E Jones

1

1 player

K Moore

2 player

K Moore

Strong Positive Correlation

0.1

1 player

K Moore

2 player

TC Coleman

No Correlation

-0.22

1 player

K Moore

2 player

B Smith

Weak Negative Correlation

0.49

1 player

K Moore

2 player

A Davidson-Richards

Positive Correlation

0.11

1 player

K Moore

2 player

D Gregory

No Correlation

-0.06

1 player

K Moore

2 player

A Stonehouse

No Correlation

-0.23

1 player

K Moore

2 player

E Jones

Weak Negative Correlation

0.1

1 player

TC Coleman

2 player

K Moore

No Correlation

1

1 player

TC Coleman

2 player

TC Coleman

Strong Positive Correlation

0.16

1 player

TC Coleman

2 player

B Smith

No Correlation

-0.17

1 player

TC Coleman

2 player

A Davidson-Richards

No Correlation

0.2

1 player

TC Coleman

2 player

D Gregory

Weak Positive Correlation

0.28

1 player

TC Coleman

2 player

A Stonehouse

Weak Positive Correlation

0.26

1 player

TC Coleman

2 player

E Jones

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.22

1 player

B Smith

2 player

K Moore

Weak Negative Correlation

0.16

1 player

B Smith

2 player

TC Coleman

No Correlation

1

1 player

B Smith

2 player

B Smith

Strong Positive Correlation

0.19

1 player

B Smith

2 player

A Davidson-Richards

No Correlation

0.18

1 player

B Smith

2 player

D Gregory

No Correlation

-0.21

1 player

B Smith

2 player

A Stonehouse

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.38

1 player

B Smith

2 player

E Jones

Weak Negative Correlation

0.49

1 player

A Davidson-Richards

2 player

K Moore

Positive Correlation

-0.17

1 player

A Davidson-Richards

2 player

TC Coleman

No Correlation

0.19

1 player

A Davidson-Richards

2 player

B Smith

No Correlation

1

1 player

A Davidson-Richards

2 player

A Davidson-Richards

Strong Positive Correlation

0.27

1 player

A Davidson-Richards

2 player

D Gregory

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.09

1 player

A Davidson-Richards

2 player

A Stonehouse

No Correlation

0.09

1 player

A Davidson-Richards

2 player

E Jones

No Correlation

0.11

1 player

D Gregory

2 player

K Moore

No Correlation

0.2

1 player

D Gregory

2 player

TC Coleman

Weak Positive Correlation

0.18

1 player

D Gregory

2 player

B Smith

No Correlation

0.27

1 player

D Gregory

2 player

A Davidson-Richards

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

D Gregory

2 player

D Gregory

Strong Positive Correlation

0.23

1 player

D Gregory

2 player

A Stonehouse

Weak Positive Correlation

0.4

1 player

D Gregory

2 player

E Jones

Positive Correlation

-0.06

1 player

A Stonehouse

2 player

K Moore

No Correlation

0.28

1 player

A Stonehouse

2 player

TC Coleman

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.21

1 player

A Stonehouse

2 player

B Smith

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.09

1 player

A Stonehouse

2 player

A Davidson-Richards

No Correlation

0.23

1 player

A Stonehouse

2 player

D Gregory

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

A Stonehouse

2 player

A Stonehouse

Strong Positive Correlation

0.55

1 player

A Stonehouse

2 player

E Jones

Positive Correlation

-0.23

1 player

E Jones

2 player

K Moore

Weak Negative Correlation

0.26

1 player

E Jones

2 player

TC Coleman

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.38

1 player

E Jones

2 player

B Smith

Weak Negative Correlation

0.09

1 player

E Jones

2 player

A Davidson-Richards

No Correlation

0.4

1 player

E Jones

2 player

D Gregory

Positive Correlation

0.55

1 player

E Jones

2 player

A Stonehouse

Positive Correlation

1

1 player

E Jones

2 player

E Jones

Strong Positive Correlation

Strong Positive Correlation

No Correlation

Strong Negative Correlation

Pick **K Moore** and **M Blinkhorn Jones** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **A Davidson-Richards** and **C Hill** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **A Davidson-Richards** and **M Blinkhorn Jones** together

Strong Positive Correlation

Pick **P Scholfield** and **M Blinkhorn Jones** together

Strong Positive Correlation

Pick **D Gregory** and **M Blinkhorn Jones** together

Strong Positive Correlation

Pick **C Hill** and **M Blinkhorn Jones** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **M Blinkhorn Jones** and **A Stonehouse** together

Positive Correlation

Similar Perfomance

A Davidson-Richards 0.19

D Gregory 0.18

TC Coleman 0.16

Opposite Perfomance

E Jones -0.38

K Moore -0.22

A Stonehouse -0.21

Similar Perfomance

E Jones 0.4

A Davidson-Richards 0.27

A Stonehouse 0.23

TC Coleman 0.2

B Smith 0.18

K Moore 0.11

Similar Perfomance

K Moore 0.49

D Gregory 0.27

B Smith 0.19

E Jones 0.09

Opposite Perfomance

TC Coleman -0.17

A Stonehouse -0.09

Similar Perfomance

A Stonehouse 0.28

E Jones 0.26

D Gregory 0.2

B Smith 0.16

K Moore 0.1

Opposite Perfomance

A Davidson-Richards -0.17

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

D Wyatt BAT SVP

L Smith BOW SVP

F Davies BAT SVP

C Knott AR SVP

R Southby WK SVP

G Adams AR SVP

C Dean BOW SVP

M Bouchier BAT SVP

E Windsor BAT SVP

F Kemp BOW SVP

M Taylor BOW SVP

D Wyatt

L Smith

F Davies

C Knott

R Southby

G Adams

C Dean

M Bouchier

E Windsor

F Kemp

M Taylor

1

1 player

D Wyatt

2 player

D Wyatt

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.17

1 player

D Wyatt

2 player

L Smith

No Correlation

0.14

1 player

D Wyatt

2 player

F Davies

No Correlation

0.35

1 player

D Wyatt

2 player

C Knott

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.35

1 player

D Wyatt

2 player

R Southby

Weak Negative Correlation

0.38

1 player

D Wyatt

2 player

G Adams

Weak Positive Correlation

0.23

1 player

D Wyatt

2 player

C Dean

Weak Positive Correlation

0.33

1 player

D Wyatt

2 player

M Bouchier

Weak Positive Correlation

0.08

1 player

D Wyatt

2 player

F Kemp

No Correlation

-0.17

1 player

L Smith

2 player

D Wyatt

No Correlation

1

1 player

L Smith

2 player

L Smith

Strong Positive Correlation

0.4

1 player

L Smith

2 player

F Davies

Positive Correlation

0.2

1 player

L Smith

2 player

C Knott

Weak Positive Correlation

0.2

1 player

L Smith

2 player

R Southby

Weak Positive Correlation

0.18

1 player

L Smith

2 player

G Adams

No Correlation

0.33

1 player

L Smith

2 player

C Dean

Weak Positive Correlation

0.23

1 player

L Smith

2 player

M Bouchier

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.38

1 player

L Smith

2 player

F Kemp

Weak Negative Correlation

0.14

1 player

F Davies

2 player

D Wyatt

No Correlation

0.4

1 player

F Davies

2 player

L Smith

Positive Correlation

1

1 player

F Davies

2 player

F Davies

Strong Positive Correlation

0.2

1 player

F Davies

2 player

C Knott

Weak Positive Correlation

0.2

1 player

F Davies

2 player

R Southby

Weak Positive Correlation

0

1 player

F Davies

2 player

G Adams

No Correlation

0

1 player

F Davies

2 player

C Dean

No Correlation

0.42

1 player

F Davies

2 player

M Bouchier

Positive Correlation

0

1 player

F Davies

2 player

F Kemp

No Correlation

0.35

1 player

C Knott

2 player

D Wyatt

Weak Positive Correlation

0.2

1 player

C Knott

2 player

L Smith

Weak Positive Correlation

0.2

1 player

C Knott

2 player

F Davies

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

C Knott

2 player

C Knott

Strong Positive Correlation

0.09

1 player

C Knott

2 player

R Southby

No Correlation

0.6

1 player

C Knott

2 player

G Adams

Positive Correlation

0.67

1 player

C Knott

2 player

C Dean

Positive Correlation

-0.14

1 player

C Knott

2 player

M Bouchier

No Correlation

0.11

1 player

C Knott

2 player

F Kemp

No Correlation

-0.35

1 player

R Southby

2 player

D Wyatt

Weak Negative Correlation

0.2

1 player

R Southby

2 player

L Smith

Weak Positive Correlation

0.2

1 player

R Southby

2 player

F Davies

Weak Positive Correlation

0.09

1 player

R Southby

2 player

C Knott

No Correlation

1

1 player

R Southby

2 player

R Southby

Strong Positive Correlation

0.2

1 player

R Southby

2 player

G Adams

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.33

1 player

R Southby

2 player

C Dean

Weak Negative Correlation

0.7

1 player

R Southby

2 player

M Bouchier

Positive Correlation

0.78

1 player

R Southby

2 player

F Kemp

Positive Correlation

0.38

1 player

G Adams

2 player

D Wyatt

Weak Positive Correlation

0.18

1 player

G Adams

2 player

L Smith

No Correlation

0

1 player

G Adams

2 player

F Davies

No Correlation

0.6

1 player

G Adams

2 player

C Knott

Positive Correlation

0.2

1 player

G Adams

2 player

R Southby

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

G Adams

2 player

G Adams

Strong Positive Correlation

0.38

1 player

G Adams

2 player

C Dean

Weak Positive Correlation

0.33

1 player

G Adams

2 player

M Bouchier

Weak Positive Correlation

0

1 player

G Adams

2 player

F Kemp

No Correlation

0.23

1 player

C Dean

2 player

D Wyatt

Weak Positive Correlation

0.33

1 player

C Dean

2 player

L Smith

Weak Positive Correlation

0

1 player

C Dean

2 player

F Davies

No Correlation

0.67

1 player

C Dean

2 player

C Knott

Positive Correlation

-0.33

1 player

C Dean

2 player

R Southby

Weak Negative Correlation

0.38

1 player

C Dean

2 player

G Adams

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

C Dean

2 player

C Dean

Strong Positive Correlation

0.14

1 player

C Dean

2 player

M Bouchier

No Correlation

-0.09

1 player

C Dean

2 player

F Kemp

No Correlation

0.33

1 player

M Bouchier

2 player

D Wyatt

Weak Positive Correlation

0.23

1 player

M Bouchier

2 player

L Smith

Weak Positive Correlation

0.42

1 player

M Bouchier

2 player

F Davies

Positive Correlation

-0.14

1 player

M Bouchier

2 player

C Knott

No Correlation

0.7

1 player

M Bouchier

2 player

R Southby

Positive Correlation

0.33

1 player

M Bouchier

2 player

G Adams

Weak Positive Correlation

0.14

1 player

M Bouchier

2 player

C Dean

No Correlation

1

1 player

M Bouchier

2 player

M Bouchier

Strong Positive Correlation

0.47

1 player

M Bouchier

2 player

F Kemp

Positive Correlation

0.08

1 player

F Kemp

2 player

D Wyatt

No Correlation

-0.38

1 player

F Kemp

2 player

L Smith

Weak Negative Correlation

0

1 player

F Kemp

2 player

F Davies

No Correlation

0.11

1 player

F Kemp

2 player

C Knott

No Correlation

0.78

1 player

F Kemp

2 player

R Southby

Positive Correlation

0

1 player

F Kemp

2 player

G Adams

No Correlation

-0.09

1 player

F Kemp

2 player

C Dean

No Correlation

0.47

1 player

F Kemp

2 player

M Bouchier

Positive Correlation

1

1 player

F Kemp

2 player

F Kemp

Strong Positive Correlation

Strong Positive Correlation

No Correlation

Strong Negative Correlation

Pick **C Knott** and **G Adams** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **C Knott** and **C Dean** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **R Southby** and **M Bouchier** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **R Southby** and **F Kemp** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **C Knott** and **E Windsor** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **C Knott** and **M Taylor** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **R Southby** and **E Windsor** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **G Adams** and **E Windsor** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **G Adams** and **M Taylor** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **C Dean** and **E Windsor** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **C Dean** and **M Taylor** together

Negative Correlation

Similar Perfomance

C Knott 0.6

D Wyatt 0.38

C Dean 0.38

M Bouchier 0.33

R Southby 0.2

L Smith 0.18

Opposite Perfomance

Similar Perfomance

F Davies 0.4

C Dean 0.33

M Bouchier 0.23

C Knott 0.2

R Southby 0.2

G Adams 0.18

Opposite Perfomance

F Kemp -0.38

D Wyatt -0.17

Similar Perfomance

C Knott 0.67

G Adams 0.38

L Smith 0.33

D Wyatt 0.23

M Bouchier 0.14

Opposite Perfomance

R Southby -0.33

F Kemp -0.09

Similar Perfomance

G Adams 0.38

C Knott 0.35

M Bouchier 0.33

C Dean 0.23

F Davies 0.14

F Kemp 0.08

Opposite Perfomance

R Southby -0.35

L Smith -0.17

Similar Perfomance

R Southby 0.7

F Kemp 0.47

F Davies 0.42

D Wyatt 0.33

G Adams 0.33

L Smith 0.23

C Dean 0.14

Opposite Perfomance

C Knott -0.14

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

K Moore AR SES

TC Coleman BOW SES

T Farrant AR SES

B Smith BAT SES

A Davidson-Richards AR SES

P Scholfield BAT SES

D Gregory BOW SES

C Hill WK SES

M Blinkhorn Jones BAT SES

A Stonehouse BOW SES

E Jones AR SES

K Moore

TC Coleman

T Farrant

B Smith

A Davidson-Richards

P Scholfield

D Gregory

C Hill

M Blinkhorn Jones

A Stonehouse

E Jones

1

1 player

K Moore

2 player

K Moore

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.14

1 player

K Moore

2 player

TC Coleman

No Correlation

-0.5

1 player

K Moore

2 player

B Smith

Negative Correlation

0.71

1 player

K Moore

2 player

A Davidson-Richards

Positive Correlation

-0.17

1 player

K Moore

2 player

D Gregory

No Correlation

-0.14

1 player

K Moore

2 player

A Stonehouse

No Correlation

-0.23

1 player

K Moore

2 player

E Jones

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.14

1 player

TC Coleman

2 player

K Moore

No Correlation

1

1 player

TC Coleman

2 player

TC Coleman

Strong Positive Correlation

0.11

1 player

TC Coleman

2 player

B Smith

No Correlation

-0.67

1 player

TC Coleman

2 player

A Davidson-Richards

Negative Correlation

-0.11

1 player

TC Coleman

2 player

D Gregory

No Correlation

0

1 player

TC Coleman

2 player

A Stonehouse

No Correlation

0.14

1 player

TC Coleman

2 player

E Jones

No Correlation

-0.5

1 player

B Smith

2 player

K Moore

Negative Correlation

0.11

1 player

B Smith

2 player

TC Coleman

No Correlation

1

1 player

B Smith

2 player

B Smith

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.13

1 player

B Smith

2 player

A Davidson-Richards

No Correlation

-0.11

1 player

B Smith

2 player

D Gregory

No Correlation

-0.41

1 player

B Smith

2 player

A Stonehouse

Negative Correlation

-0.4

1 player

B Smith

2 player

E Jones

Weak Negative Correlation

0.71

1 player

A Davidson-Richards

2 player

K Moore

Positive Correlation

-0.67

1 player

A Davidson-Richards

2 player

TC Coleman

Negative Correlation

-0.13

1 player

A Davidson-Richards

2 player

B Smith

No Correlation

1

1 player

A Davidson-Richards

2 player

A Davidson-Richards

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.09

1 player

A Davidson-Richards

2 player

D Gregory

No Correlation

-0.43

1 player

A Davidson-Richards

2 player

A Stonehouse

Negative Correlation

-0.2

1 player

A Davidson-Richards

2 player

E Jones

No Correlation

-0.17

1 player

D Gregory

2 player

K Moore

No Correlation

-0.11

1 player

D Gregory

2 player

TC Coleman

No Correlation

-0.11

1 player

D Gregory

2 player

B Smith

No Correlation

-0.09

1 player

D Gregory

2 player

A Davidson-Richards

No Correlation

1

1 player

D Gregory

2 player

D Gregory

Strong Positive Correlation

0.12

1 player

D Gregory

2 player

A Stonehouse

No Correlation

0.33

1 player

D Gregory

2 player

E Jones

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.14

1 player

A Stonehouse

2 player

K Moore

No Correlation

0

1 player

A Stonehouse

2 player

TC Coleman

No Correlation

-0.41

1 player

A Stonehouse

2 player

B Smith

Negative Correlation

-0.43

1 player

A Stonehouse

2 player

A Davidson-Richards

Negative Correlation

0.12

1 player

A Stonehouse

2 player

D Gregory

No Correlation

1

1 player

A Stonehouse

2 player

A Stonehouse

Strong Positive Correlation

0.25

1 player

A Stonehouse

2 player

E Jones

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.23

1 player

E Jones

2 player

K Moore

Weak Negative Correlation

0.14

1 player

E Jones

2 player

TC Coleman

No Correlation

-0.4

1 player

E Jones

2 player

B Smith

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.2

1 player

E Jones

2 player

A Davidson-Richards

No Correlation

0.33

1 player

E Jones

2 player

D Gregory

Weak Positive Correlation

0.25

1 player

E Jones

2 player

A Stonehouse

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

E Jones

2 player

E Jones

Strong Positive Correlation

Strong Positive Correlation

No Correlation

Strong Negative Correlation

Pick **K Moore** and **A Davidson-Richards** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **M Blinkhorn Jones** and **E Jones** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **TC Coleman** and **A Davidson-Richards** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **TC Coleman** and **M Blinkhorn Jones** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **T Farrant** and **C Hill** together

Strong Negative Correlation

Pick **T Farrant** and **M Blinkhorn Jones** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **B Smith** and **M Blinkhorn Jones** together

Negative Correlation

Similar Perfomance

TC Coleman 0.11

Opposite Perfomance

K Moore -0.5

A Stonehouse -0.41

E Jones -0.4

A Davidson-Richards -0.13

D Gregory -0.11

Similar Perfomance

E Jones 0.33

A Stonehouse 0.12

Opposite Perfomance

K Moore -0.17

TC Coleman -0.11

B Smith -0.11

A Davidson-Richards -0.09

Similar Perfomance

K Moore 0.71

Opposite Perfomance

TC Coleman -0.67

A Stonehouse -0.43

E Jones -0.2

B Smith -0.13

D Gregory -0.09

Similar Perfomance

E Jones 0.14

B Smith 0.11

Opposite Perfomance

A Davidson-Richards -0.67

K Moore -0.14

D Gregory -0.11