SVP vs SUNR

This guide is super useful for identifying player combinations that are likely to score big. Use the filters to identify the best player combinations according to specific match scenarios.

Both players generally perform similarly when picked together. They either score high together or score low together. Maximise FPts by picking players that correlate positively with top players.

Both players generally perform in an opposite manner. If one player scores high, the other usually scores low. Avoid picking players that correlate negatively with top player

SVP vs SUNR

Show Player Combinations on the basis of:

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

L Smith BOW SVP

F Davies BAT SVP

G Elwiss BAT SVP

C Knott AR SVP

R Southby WK SVP

A Monaghan BOW SVP

G Adams AR SVP

E Windsor BAT SVP

F Kemp BOW SVP

N Harman AR SVP

M Taylor BOW SVP

L Smith

F Davies

G Elwiss

C Knott

R Southby

A Monaghan

G Adams

E Windsor

F Kemp

N Harman

M Taylor

1

1 player

L Smith

2 player

L Smith

Strong Positive Correlation

0.39

1 player

L Smith

2 player

F Davies

Weak Positive Correlation

0.24

1 player

L Smith

2 player

G Elwiss

Weak Positive Correlation

0.25

1 player

L Smith

2 player

C Knott

Weak Positive Correlation

0.44

1 player

L Smith

2 player

R Southby

Positive Correlation

0.01

1 player

L Smith

2 player

A Monaghan

No Correlation

0.37

1 player

L Smith

2 player

G Adams

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.04

1 player

L Smith

2 player

E Windsor

No Correlation

0.06

1 player

L Smith

2 player

F Kemp

No Correlation

-0.02

1 player

L Smith

2 player

N Harman

No Correlation

0.11

1 player

L Smith

2 player

M Taylor

No Correlation

0.39

1 player

F Davies

2 player

L Smith

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

F Davies

2 player

F Davies

Strong Positive Correlation

0.3

1 player

F Davies

2 player

G Elwiss

Weak Positive Correlation

0.39

1 player

F Davies

2 player

C Knott

Weak Positive Correlation

0.32

1 player

F Davies

2 player

R Southby

Weak Positive Correlation

0.1

1 player

F Davies

2 player

A Monaghan

No Correlation

0.24

1 player

F Davies

2 player

G Adams

Weak Positive Correlation

0.11

1 player

F Davies

2 player

E Windsor

No Correlation

0.17

1 player

F Davies

2 player

F Kemp

No Correlation

0.07

1 player

F Davies

2 player

N Harman

No Correlation

0.36

1 player

F Davies

2 player

M Taylor

Weak Positive Correlation

0.24

1 player

G Elwiss

2 player

L Smith

Weak Positive Correlation

0.3

1 player

G Elwiss

2 player

F Davies

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

G Elwiss

2 player

G Elwiss

Strong Positive Correlation

0.39

1 player

G Elwiss

2 player

C Knott

Weak Positive Correlation

0.29

1 player

G Elwiss

2 player

R Southby

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.13

1 player

G Elwiss

2 player

A Monaghan

No Correlation

0.34

1 player

G Elwiss

2 player

G Adams

Weak Positive Correlation

0.01

1 player

G Elwiss

2 player

E Windsor

No Correlation

0.33

1 player

G Elwiss

2 player

F Kemp

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.03

1 player

G Elwiss

2 player

N Harman

No Correlation

0.05

1 player

G Elwiss

2 player

M Taylor

No Correlation

0.25

1 player

C Knott

2 player

L Smith

Weak Positive Correlation

0.39

1 player

C Knott

2 player

F Davies

Weak Positive Correlation

0.39

1 player

C Knott

2 player

G Elwiss

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

C Knott

2 player

C Knott

Strong Positive Correlation

0.18

1 player

C Knott

2 player

R Southby

No Correlation

-0.24

1 player

C Knott

2 player

A Monaghan

Weak Negative Correlation

0.6

1 player

C Knott

2 player

G Adams

Positive Correlation

-0.15

1 player

C Knott

2 player

E Windsor

No Correlation

0.21

1 player

C Knott

2 player

F Kemp

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.36

1 player

C Knott

2 player

N Harman

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.16

1 player

C Knott

2 player

M Taylor

No Correlation

0.44

1 player

R Southby

2 player

L Smith

Positive Correlation

0.32

1 player

R Southby

2 player

F Davies

Weak Positive Correlation

0.29

1 player

R Southby

2 player

G Elwiss

Weak Positive Correlation

0.18

1 player

R Southby

2 player

C Knott

No Correlation

1

1 player

R Southby

2 player

R Southby

Strong Positive Correlation

0.14

1 player

R Southby

2 player

A Monaghan

No Correlation

0.19

1 player

R Southby

2 player

G Adams

No Correlation

0.42

1 player

R Southby

2 player

E Windsor

Positive Correlation

0.51

1 player

R Southby

2 player

F Kemp

Positive Correlation

0.34

1 player

R Southby

2 player

N Harman

Weak Positive Correlation

0.34

1 player

R Southby

2 player

M Taylor

Weak Positive Correlation

0.01

1 player

A Monaghan

2 player

L Smith

No Correlation

0.1

1 player

A Monaghan

2 player

F Davies

No Correlation

-0.13

1 player

A Monaghan

2 player

G Elwiss

No Correlation

-0.24

1 player

A Monaghan

2 player

C Knott

Weak Negative Correlation

0.14

1 player

A Monaghan

2 player

R Southby

No Correlation

1

1 player

A Monaghan

2 player

A Monaghan

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.16

1 player

A Monaghan

2 player

G Adams

No Correlation

0.36

1 player

A Monaghan

2 player

E Windsor

Weak Positive Correlation

0.21

1 player

A Monaghan

2 player

F Kemp

Weak Positive Correlation

0.48

1 player

A Monaghan

2 player

N Harman

Positive Correlation

0.39

1 player

A Monaghan

2 player

M Taylor

Weak Positive Correlation

0.37

1 player

G Adams

2 player

L Smith

Weak Positive Correlation

0.24

1 player

G Adams

2 player

F Davies

Weak Positive Correlation

0.34

1 player

G Adams

2 player

G Elwiss

Weak Positive Correlation

0.6

1 player

G Adams

2 player

C Knott

Positive Correlation

0.19

1 player

G Adams

2 player

R Southby

No Correlation

-0.16

1 player

G Adams

2 player

A Monaghan

No Correlation

1

1 player

G Adams

2 player

G Adams

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.17

1 player

G Adams

2 player

E Windsor

No Correlation

0.07

1 player

G Adams

2 player

F Kemp

No Correlation

-0.21

1 player

G Adams

2 player

N Harman

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.23

1 player

G Adams

2 player

M Taylor

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.04

1 player

E Windsor

2 player

L Smith

No Correlation

0.11

1 player

E Windsor

2 player

F Davies

No Correlation

0.01

1 player

E Windsor

2 player

G Elwiss

No Correlation

-0.15

1 player

E Windsor

2 player

C Knott

No Correlation

0.42

1 player

E Windsor

2 player

R Southby

Positive Correlation

0.36

1 player

E Windsor

2 player

A Monaghan

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.17

1 player

E Windsor

2 player

G Adams

No Correlation

1

1 player

E Windsor

2 player

E Windsor

Strong Positive Correlation

0.56

1 player

E Windsor

2 player

F Kemp

Positive Correlation

0.73

1 player

E Windsor

2 player

N Harman

Positive Correlation

0.43

1 player

E Windsor

2 player

M Taylor

Positive Correlation

0.06

1 player

F Kemp

2 player

L Smith

No Correlation

0.17

1 player

F Kemp

2 player

F Davies

No Correlation

0.33

1 player

F Kemp

2 player

G Elwiss

Weak Positive Correlation

0.21

1 player

F Kemp

2 player

C Knott

Weak Positive Correlation

0.51

1 player

F Kemp

2 player

R Southby

Positive Correlation

0.21

1 player

F Kemp

2 player

A Monaghan

Weak Positive Correlation

0.07

1 player

F Kemp

2 player

G Adams

No Correlation

0.56

1 player

F Kemp

2 player

E Windsor

Positive Correlation

1

1 player

F Kemp

2 player

F Kemp

Strong Positive Correlation

0.18

1 player

F Kemp

2 player

N Harman

No Correlation

0.46

1 player

F Kemp

2 player

M Taylor

Positive Correlation

-0.02

1 player

N Harman

2 player

L Smith

No Correlation

0.07

1 player

N Harman

2 player

F Davies

No Correlation

-0.03

1 player

N Harman

2 player

G Elwiss

No Correlation

-0.36

1 player

N Harman

2 player

C Knott

Weak Negative Correlation

0.34

1 player

N Harman

2 player

R Southby

Weak Positive Correlation

0.48

1 player

N Harman

2 player

A Monaghan

Positive Correlation

-0.21

1 player

N Harman

2 player

G Adams

Weak Negative Correlation

0.73

1 player

N Harman

2 player

E Windsor

Positive Correlation

0.18

1 player

N Harman

2 player

F Kemp

No Correlation

1

1 player

N Harman

2 player

N Harman

Strong Positive Correlation

0.56

1 player

N Harman

2 player

M Taylor

Positive Correlation

0.11

1 player

M Taylor

2 player

L Smith

No Correlation

0.36

1 player

M Taylor

2 player

F Davies

Weak Positive Correlation

0.05

1 player

M Taylor

2 player

G Elwiss

No Correlation

-0.16

1 player

M Taylor

2 player

C Knott

No Correlation

0.34

1 player

M Taylor

2 player

R Southby

Weak Positive Correlation

0.39

1 player

M Taylor

2 player

A Monaghan

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.23

1 player

M Taylor

2 player

G Adams

Weak Negative Correlation

0.43

1 player

M Taylor

2 player

E Windsor

Positive Correlation

0.46

1 player

M Taylor

2 player

F Kemp

Positive Correlation

0.56

1 player

M Taylor

2 player

N Harman

Positive Correlation

1

1 player

M Taylor

2 player

M Taylor

Strong Positive Correlation

Strong Positive Correlation

No Correlation

Strong Negative Correlation

Pick **C Knott** and **G Adams** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **E Windsor** and **N Harman** together

Positive Correlation

Similar Perfomance

C Knott 0.6

L Smith 0.37

G Elwiss 0.34

F Davies 0.24

R Southby 0.19

F Kemp 0.07

Opposite Perfomance

M Taylor -0.23

N Harman -0.21

E Windsor -0.17

A Monaghan -0.16

Similar Perfomance

C Knott 0.39

G Adams 0.34

F Kemp 0.33

F Davies 0.3

R Southby 0.29

L Smith 0.24

M Taylor 0.05

E Windsor 0.01

Opposite Perfomance

A Monaghan -0.13

N Harman -0.03

Similar Perfomance

R Southby 0.44

F Davies 0.39

G Adams 0.37

C Knott 0.25

G Elwiss 0.24

M Taylor 0.11

F Kemp 0.06

A Monaghan 0.01

Opposite Perfomance

E Windsor -0.04

N Harman -0.02

Similar Perfomance

G Adams 0.6

F Davies 0.39

G Elwiss 0.39

L Smith 0.25

F Kemp 0.21

R Southby 0.18

Opposite Perfomance

N Harman -0.36

A Monaghan -0.24

M Taylor -0.16

E Windsor -0.15

Similar Perfomance

E Windsor 0.56

R Southby 0.51

M Taylor 0.46

G Elwiss 0.33

C Knott 0.21

A Monaghan 0.21

N Harman 0.18

F Davies 0.17

G Adams 0.07

L Smith 0.06

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

J Grewcock AR SUNR

N Hancock BOW SUNR

M Villiers AR SUNR

E Gray BOW SUNR

A Carr WK SUNR

C Griffith BAT SUNR

J Gardner AR SUNR

S Munro BOW SUNR

A Macleod BAT SUNR

G Scrivens BAT SUNR

F Miller BAT SUNR

J Grewcock

N Hancock

M Villiers

E Gray

A Carr

C Griffith

J Gardner

S Munro

A Macleod

G Scrivens

F Miller

1

1 player

J Grewcock

2 player

J Grewcock

Strong Positive Correlation

0.01

1 player

J Grewcock

2 player

N Hancock

No Correlation

0.36

1 player

J Grewcock

2 player

M Villiers

Weak Positive Correlation

0.52

1 player

J Grewcock

2 player

E Gray

Positive Correlation

0.38

1 player

J Grewcock

2 player

A Carr

Weak Positive Correlation

0.2

1 player

J Grewcock

2 player

C Griffith

Weak Positive Correlation

0.12

1 player

J Grewcock

2 player

J Gardner

No Correlation

0

1 player

J Grewcock

2 player

A Macleod

No Correlation

0.3

1 player

J Grewcock

2 player

G Scrivens

Weak Positive Correlation

0.53

1 player

J Grewcock

2 player

F Miller

Positive Correlation

0.01

1 player

N Hancock

2 player

J Grewcock

No Correlation

1

1 player

N Hancock

2 player

N Hancock

Strong Positive Correlation

0.16

1 player

N Hancock

2 player

M Villiers

No Correlation

0

1 player

N Hancock

2 player

E Gray

No Correlation

0.29

1 player

N Hancock

2 player

A Carr

Weak Positive Correlation

0.24

1 player

N Hancock

2 player

C Griffith

Weak Positive Correlation

0.18

1 player

N Hancock

2 player

J Gardner

No Correlation

0.2

1 player

N Hancock

2 player

A Macleod

Weak Positive Correlation

0.39

1 player

N Hancock

2 player

G Scrivens

Weak Positive Correlation

0.14

1 player

N Hancock

2 player

F Miller

No Correlation

0.36

1 player

M Villiers

2 player

J Grewcock

Weak Positive Correlation

0.16

1 player

M Villiers

2 player

N Hancock

No Correlation

1

1 player

M Villiers

2 player

M Villiers

Strong Positive Correlation

0.18

1 player

M Villiers

2 player

E Gray

No Correlation

0.12

1 player

M Villiers

2 player

A Carr

No Correlation

0.3

1 player

M Villiers

2 player

C Griffith

Weak Positive Correlation

0.39

1 player

M Villiers

2 player

J Gardner

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.01

1 player

M Villiers

2 player

A Macleod

No Correlation

0.24

1 player

M Villiers

2 player

G Scrivens

Weak Positive Correlation

0.15

1 player

M Villiers

2 player

F Miller

No Correlation

0.52

1 player

E Gray

2 player

J Grewcock

Positive Correlation

0

1 player

E Gray

2 player

N Hancock

No Correlation

0.18

1 player

E Gray

2 player

M Villiers

No Correlation

1

1 player

E Gray

2 player

E Gray

Strong Positive Correlation

0.26

1 player

E Gray

2 player

A Carr

Weak Positive Correlation

0.29

1 player

E Gray

2 player

C Griffith

Weak Positive Correlation

0.23

1 player

E Gray

2 player

J Gardner

Weak Positive Correlation

0.21

1 player

E Gray

2 player

A Macleod

Weak Positive Correlation

0.25

1 player

E Gray

2 player

G Scrivens

Weak Positive Correlation

0.41

1 player

E Gray

2 player

F Miller

Positive Correlation

0.38

1 player

A Carr

2 player

J Grewcock

Weak Positive Correlation

0.29

1 player

A Carr

2 player

N Hancock

Weak Positive Correlation

0.12

1 player

A Carr

2 player

M Villiers

No Correlation

0.26

1 player

A Carr

2 player

E Gray

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

A Carr

2 player

A Carr

Strong Positive Correlation

0.42

1 player

A Carr

2 player

C Griffith

Positive Correlation

0.21

1 player

A Carr

2 player

J Gardner

Weak Positive Correlation

0.32

1 player

A Carr

2 player

A Macleod

Weak Positive Correlation

0.34

1 player

A Carr

2 player

G Scrivens

Weak Positive Correlation

0.46

1 player

A Carr

2 player

F Miller

Positive Correlation

0.2

1 player

C Griffith

2 player

J Grewcock

Weak Positive Correlation

0.24

1 player

C Griffith

2 player

N Hancock

Weak Positive Correlation

0.3

1 player

C Griffith

2 player

M Villiers

Weak Positive Correlation

0.29

1 player

C Griffith

2 player

E Gray

Weak Positive Correlation

0.42

1 player

C Griffith

2 player

A Carr

Positive Correlation

1

1 player

C Griffith

2 player

C Griffith

Strong Positive Correlation

0.09

1 player

C Griffith

2 player

J Gardner

No Correlation

0.23

1 player

C Griffith

2 player

A Macleod

Weak Positive Correlation

0.28

1 player

C Griffith

2 player

G Scrivens

Weak Positive Correlation

0.37

1 player

C Griffith

2 player

F Miller

Weak Positive Correlation

0.12

1 player

J Gardner

2 player

J Grewcock

No Correlation

0.18

1 player

J Gardner

2 player

N Hancock

No Correlation

0.39

1 player

J Gardner

2 player

M Villiers

Weak Positive Correlation

0.23

1 player

J Gardner

2 player

E Gray

Weak Positive Correlation

0.21

1 player

J Gardner

2 player

A Carr

Weak Positive Correlation

0.09

1 player

J Gardner

2 player

C Griffith

No Correlation

1

1 player

J Gardner

2 player

J Gardner

Strong Positive Correlation

0.37

1 player

J Gardner

2 player

A Macleod

Weak Positive Correlation

0.53

1 player

J Gardner

2 player

G Scrivens

Positive Correlation

0.04

1 player

J Gardner

2 player

F Miller

No Correlation

0

1 player

A Macleod

2 player

J Grewcock

No Correlation

0.2

1 player

A Macleod

2 player

N Hancock

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.01

1 player

A Macleod

2 player

M Villiers

No Correlation

0.21

1 player

A Macleod

2 player

E Gray

Weak Positive Correlation

0.32

1 player

A Macleod

2 player

A Carr

Weak Positive Correlation

0.23

1 player

A Macleod

2 player

C Griffith

Weak Positive Correlation

0.37

1 player

A Macleod

2 player

J Gardner

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

A Macleod

2 player

A Macleod

Strong Positive Correlation

0.15

1 player

A Macleod

2 player

G Scrivens

No Correlation

0.15

1 player

A Macleod

2 player

F Miller

No Correlation

0.3

1 player

G Scrivens

2 player

J Grewcock

Weak Positive Correlation

0.39

1 player

G Scrivens

2 player

N Hancock

Weak Positive Correlation

0.24

1 player

G Scrivens

2 player

M Villiers

Weak Positive Correlation

0.25

1 player

G Scrivens

2 player

E Gray

Weak Positive Correlation

0.34

1 player

G Scrivens

2 player

A Carr

Weak Positive Correlation

0.28

1 player

G Scrivens

2 player

C Griffith

Weak Positive Correlation

0.53

1 player

G Scrivens

2 player

J Gardner

Positive Correlation

0.15

1 player

G Scrivens

2 player

A Macleod

No Correlation

1

1 player

G Scrivens

2 player

G Scrivens

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.01

1 player

G Scrivens

2 player

F Miller

No Correlation

0.53

1 player

F Miller

2 player

J Grewcock

Positive Correlation

0.14

1 player

F Miller

2 player

N Hancock

No Correlation

0.15

1 player

F Miller

2 player

M Villiers

No Correlation

0.41

1 player

F Miller

2 player

E Gray

Positive Correlation

0.46

1 player

F Miller

2 player

A Carr

Positive Correlation

0.37

1 player

F Miller

2 player

C Griffith

Weak Positive Correlation

0.04

1 player

F Miller

2 player

J Gardner

No Correlation

0.15

1 player

F Miller

2 player

A Macleod

No Correlation

-0.01

1 player

F Miller

2 player

G Scrivens

No Correlation

1

1 player

F Miller

2 player

F Miller

Strong Positive Correlation

Strong Positive Correlation

No Correlation

Strong Negative Correlation

No data found

Similar Perfomance

J Gardner 0.53

N Hancock 0.39

A Carr 0.34

J Grewcock 0.3

C Griffith 0.28

E Gray 0.25

M Villiers 0.24

A Macleod 0.15

Opposite Perfomance

F Miller -0.01

Similar Perfomance

J Gardner 0.39

J Grewcock 0.36

C Griffith 0.3

G Scrivens 0.24

E Gray 0.18

N Hancock 0.16

F Miller 0.15

A Carr 0.12

Opposite Perfomance

A Macleod -0.01

Similar Perfomance

G Scrivens 0.53

M Villiers 0.39

A Macleod 0.37

E Gray 0.23

A Carr 0.21

N Hancock 0.18

J Grewcock 0.12

C Griffith 0.09

F Miller 0.04

Similar Perfomance

A Carr 0.42

F Miller 0.37

M Villiers 0.3

E Gray 0.29

G Scrivens 0.28

N Hancock 0.24

A Macleod 0.23

J Grewcock 0.2

J Gardner 0.09

Similar Perfomance

J Grewcock 0.52

F Miller 0.41

C Griffith 0.29

A Carr 0.26

G Scrivens 0.25

J Gardner 0.23

A Macleod 0.21

M Villiers 0.18

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

No data found

No data found

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

J Grewcock AR SUNR

N Hancock BOW SUNR

M Villiers AR SUNR

E Gray BOW SUNR

A Carr WK SUNR

C Griffith BAT SUNR

J Gardner AR SUNR

S Munro BOW SUNR

A Macleod BAT SUNR

G Scrivens BAT SUNR

F Miller BAT SUNR

J Grewcock

N Hancock

M Villiers

E Gray

A Carr

C Griffith

J Gardner

S Munro

A Macleod

G Scrivens

F Miller

1

1 player

J Grewcock

2 player

J Grewcock

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.5

1 player

J Grewcock

2 player

N Hancock

Negative Correlation

0.33

1 player

J Grewcock

2 player

M Villiers

Weak Positive Correlation

0.56

1 player

J Grewcock

2 player

E Gray

Positive Correlation

0.33

1 player

J Grewcock

2 player

A Carr

Weak Positive Correlation

0

1 player

J Grewcock

2 player

C Griffith

No Correlation

-0.33

1 player

J Grewcock

2 player

J Gardner

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.56

1 player

J Grewcock

2 player

A Macleod

Negative Correlation

0.11

1 player

J Grewcock

2 player

G Scrivens

No Correlation

0.11

1 player

J Grewcock

2 player

F Miller

No Correlation

-0.5

1 player

N Hancock

2 player

J Grewcock

Negative Correlation

1

1 player

N Hancock

2 player

N Hancock

Strong Positive Correlation

0

1 player

N Hancock

2 player

M Villiers

No Correlation

-0.5

1 player

N Hancock

2 player

E Gray

Negative Correlation

-0.25

1 player

N Hancock

2 player

A Carr

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.35

1 player

N Hancock

2 player

C Griffith

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.25

1 player

N Hancock

2 player

J Gardner

Weak Negative Correlation

0.25

1 player

N Hancock

2 player

A Macleod

Weak Positive Correlation

0.25

1 player

N Hancock

2 player

G Scrivens

Weak Positive Correlation

0

1 player

N Hancock

2 player

F Miller

No Correlation

0.33

1 player

M Villiers

2 player

J Grewcock

Weak Positive Correlation

0

1 player

M Villiers

2 player

N Hancock

No Correlation

1

1 player

M Villiers

2 player

M Villiers

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.12

1 player

M Villiers

2 player

E Gray

No Correlation

-0.05

1 player

M Villiers

2 player

A Carr

No Correlation

0

1 player

M Villiers

2 player

C Griffith

No Correlation

-0.05

1 player

M Villiers

2 player

J Gardner

No Correlation

-0.33

1 player

M Villiers

2 player

A Macleod

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.1

1 player

M Villiers

2 player

G Scrivens

No Correlation

-0.2

1 player

M Villiers

2 player

F Miller

No Correlation

0.56

1 player

E Gray

2 player

J Grewcock

Positive Correlation

-0.5

1 player

E Gray

2 player

N Hancock

Negative Correlation

-0.12

1 player

E Gray

2 player

M Villiers

No Correlation

1

1 player

E Gray

2 player

E Gray

Strong Positive Correlation

0

1 player

E Gray

2 player

A Carr

No Correlation

0.4

1 player

E Gray

2 player

C Griffith

Positive Correlation

-0.07

1 player

E Gray

2 player

J Gardner

No Correlation

-0.14

1 player

E Gray

2 player

A Macleod

No Correlation

-0.07

1 player

E Gray

2 player

G Scrivens

No Correlation

-0.12

1 player

E Gray

2 player

F Miller

No Correlation

0.33

1 player

A Carr

2 player

J Grewcock

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.25

1 player

A Carr

2 player

N Hancock

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.05

1 player

A Carr

2 player

M Villiers

No Correlation

0

1 player

A Carr

2 player

E Gray

No Correlation

1

1 player

A Carr

2 player

A Carr

Strong Positive Correlation

0.45

1 player

A Carr

2 player

C Griffith

Positive Correlation

-0.53

1 player

A Carr

2 player

J Gardner

Negative Correlation

-0.25

1 player

A Carr

2 player

A Macleod

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.16

1 player

A Carr

2 player

G Scrivens

No Correlation

0.22

1 player

A Carr

2 player

F Miller

Weak Positive Correlation

0

1 player

C Griffith

2 player

J Grewcock

No Correlation

-0.35

1 player

C Griffith

2 player

N Hancock

Weak Negative Correlation

0

1 player

C Griffith

2 player

M Villiers

No Correlation

0.4

1 player

C Griffith

2 player

E Gray

Positive Correlation

0.45

1 player

C Griffith

2 player

A Carr

Positive Correlation

1

1 player

C Griffith

2 player

C Griffith

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.29

1 player

C Griffith

2 player

J Gardner

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.2

1 player

C Griffith

2 player

A Macleod

No Correlation

0

1 player

C Griffith

2 player

G Scrivens

No Correlation

0.25

1 player

C Griffith

2 player

F Miller

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.33

1 player

J Gardner

2 player

J Grewcock

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.25

1 player

J Gardner

2 player

N Hancock

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.05

1 player

J Gardner

2 player

M Villiers

No Correlation

-0.07

1 player

J Gardner

2 player

E Gray

No Correlation

-0.53

1 player

J Gardner

2 player

A Carr

Negative Correlation

-0.29

1 player

J Gardner

2 player

C Griffith

Weak Negative Correlation

1

1 player

J Gardner

2 player

J Gardner

Strong Positive Correlation

0.29

1 player

J Gardner

2 player

A Macleod

Weak Positive Correlation

0.45

1 player

J Gardner

2 player

G Scrivens

Positive Correlation

-0.52

1 player

J Gardner

2 player

F Miller

Negative Correlation

-0.56

1 player

A Macleod

2 player

J Grewcock

Negative Correlation

0.25

1 player

A Macleod

2 player

N Hancock

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.33

1 player

A Macleod

2 player

M Villiers

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.14

1 player

A Macleod

2 player

E Gray

No Correlation

-0.25

1 player

A Macleod

2 player

A Carr

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.2

1 player

A Macleod

2 player

C Griffith

No Correlation

0.29

1 player

A Macleod

2 player

J Gardner

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

A Macleod

2 player

A Macleod

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.62

1 player

A Macleod

2 player

G Scrivens

Negative Correlation

0.07

1 player

A Macleod

2 player

F Miller

No Correlation

0.11

1 player

G Scrivens

2 player

J Grewcock

No Correlation

0.25

1 player

G Scrivens

2 player

N Hancock

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.1

1 player

G Scrivens

2 player

M Villiers

No Correlation

-0.07

1 player

G Scrivens

2 player

E Gray

No Correlation

-0.16

1 player

G Scrivens

2 player

A Carr

No Correlation

0

1 player

G Scrivens

2 player

C Griffith

No Correlation

0.45

1 player

G Scrivens

2 player

J Gardner

Positive Correlation

-0.62

1 player

G Scrivens

2 player

A Macleod

Negative Correlation

1

1 player

G Scrivens

2 player

G Scrivens

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.3

1 player

G Scrivens

2 player

F Miller

Weak Negative Correlation

0.11

1 player

F Miller

2 player

J Grewcock

No Correlation

0

1 player

F Miller

2 player

N Hancock

No Correlation

-0.2

1 player

F Miller

2 player

M Villiers

No Correlation

-0.12

1 player

F Miller

2 player

E Gray

No Correlation

0.22

1 player

F Miller

2 player

A Carr

Weak Positive Correlation

0.25

1 player

F Miller

2 player

C Griffith

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.52

1 player

F Miller

2 player

J Gardner

Negative Correlation

0.07

1 player

F Miller

2 player

A Macleod

No Correlation

-0.3

1 player

F Miller

2 player

G Scrivens

Weak Negative Correlation

1

1 player

F Miller

2 player

F Miller

Strong Positive Correlation

Strong Positive Correlation

No Correlation

Strong Negative Correlation

Pick **E Gray** and **S Munro** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **A Macleod** and **G Scrivens** together

Negative Correlation

Similar Perfomance

J Grewcock 0.33

Opposite Perfomance

A Macleod -0.33

F Miller -0.2

E Gray -0.12

G Scrivens -0.1

A Carr -0.05

J Gardner -0.05

Similar Perfomance

G Scrivens 0.45

A Macleod 0.29

Opposite Perfomance

A Carr -0.53

F Miller -0.52

J Grewcock -0.33

C Griffith -0.29

N Hancock -0.25

E Gray -0.07

M Villiers -0.05

Similar Perfomance

J Gardner 0.45

N Hancock 0.25

J Grewcock 0.11

Opposite Perfomance

A Macleod -0.62

F Miller -0.3

A Carr -0.16

M Villiers -0.1

E Gray -0.07

Similar Perfomance

C Griffith 0.45

J Grewcock 0.33

F Miller 0.22

Opposite Perfomance

J Gardner -0.53

N Hancock -0.25

A Macleod -0.25

G Scrivens -0.16

M Villiers -0.05

Similar Perfomance

J Grewcock 0.56

C Griffith 0.4

Opposite Perfomance

N Hancock -0.5

A Macleod -0.14

M Villiers -0.12

F Miller -0.12

J Gardner -0.07

G Scrivens -0.07

SVP vs SUNR