THDER vs CES

This guide is super useful for identifying player combinations that are likely to score big. Use the filters to identify the best player combinations according to specific match scenarios.

Both players generally perform similarly when picked together. They either score high together or score low together. Maximise FPts by picking players that correlate positively with top players.

Both players generally perform in an opposite manner. If one player scores high, the other usually scores low. Avoid picking players that correlate negatively with top player

THDER vs CES

Show Player Combinations on the basis of:

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

S Morris BOW THDER

T Norris BOW THDER

E Threlkeld WK THDER

E Lamb BAT THDER

D Collins BAT THDER

F Morris AR THDER

P Graham BOW THDER

L Heap BAT THDER

A Lister WK THDER

H Emily Jones BOW THDER

S Smale WK THDER

S Morris

T Norris

E Threlkeld

E Lamb

D Collins

F Morris

P Graham

L Heap

A Lister

H Emily Jones

S Smale

1

1 player

T Norris

2 player

T Norris

Strong Positive Correlation

0.2

1 player

T Norris

2 player

E Threlkeld

Weak Positive Correlation

0.43

1 player

T Norris

2 player

E Lamb

Positive Correlation

0.28

1 player

T Norris

2 player

D Collins

Weak Positive Correlation

0.24

1 player

T Norris

2 player

F Morris

Weak Positive Correlation

0.56

1 player

T Norris

2 player

P Graham

Positive Correlation

0.38

1 player

T Norris

2 player

A Lister

Weak Positive Correlation

0.23

1 player

T Norris

2 player

H Emily Jones

Weak Positive Correlation

0.13

1 player

T Norris

2 player

S Smale

No Correlation

0.2

1 player

E Threlkeld

2 player

T Norris

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

E Threlkeld

2 player

E Threlkeld

Strong Positive Correlation

0.09

1 player

E Threlkeld

2 player

E Lamb

No Correlation

0.36

1 player

E Threlkeld

2 player

D Collins

Weak Positive Correlation

0.1

1 player

E Threlkeld

2 player

F Morris

No Correlation

0.14

1 player

E Threlkeld

2 player

P Graham

No Correlation

0.34

1 player

E Threlkeld

2 player

A Lister

Weak Positive Correlation

0.24

1 player

E Threlkeld

2 player

H Emily Jones

Weak Positive Correlation

0.23

1 player

E Threlkeld

2 player

S Smale

Weak Positive Correlation

0.43

1 player

E Lamb

2 player

T Norris

Positive Correlation

0.09

1 player

E Lamb

2 player

E Threlkeld

No Correlation

1

1 player

E Lamb

2 player

E Lamb

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.07

1 player

E Lamb

2 player

D Collins

No Correlation

0.24

1 player

E Lamb

2 player

F Morris

Weak Positive Correlation

0.3

1 player

E Lamb

2 player

P Graham

Weak Positive Correlation

0.28

1 player

E Lamb

2 player

A Lister

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.1

1 player

E Lamb

2 player

H Emily Jones

No Correlation

0.39

1 player

E Lamb

2 player

S Smale

Weak Positive Correlation

0.28

1 player

D Collins

2 player

T Norris

Weak Positive Correlation

0.36

1 player

D Collins

2 player

E Threlkeld

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.07

1 player

D Collins

2 player

E Lamb

No Correlation

1

1 player

D Collins

2 player

D Collins

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.09

1 player

D Collins

2 player

F Morris

No Correlation

0.25

1 player

D Collins

2 player

P Graham

Weak Positive Correlation

0.32

1 player

D Collins

2 player

A Lister

Weak Positive Correlation

0.41

1 player

D Collins

2 player

H Emily Jones

Positive Correlation

0.03

1 player

D Collins

2 player

S Smale

No Correlation

0.24

1 player

F Morris

2 player

T Norris

Weak Positive Correlation

0.1

1 player

F Morris

2 player

E Threlkeld

No Correlation

0.24

1 player

F Morris

2 player

E Lamb

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.09

1 player

F Morris

2 player

D Collins

No Correlation

1

1 player

F Morris

2 player

F Morris

Strong Positive Correlation

0.19

1 player

F Morris

2 player

P Graham

No Correlation

-0.06

1 player

F Morris

2 player

A Lister

No Correlation

-0.18

1 player

F Morris

2 player

H Emily Jones

No Correlation

-0.02

1 player

F Morris

2 player

S Smale

No Correlation

0.56

1 player

P Graham

2 player

T Norris

Positive Correlation

0.14

1 player

P Graham

2 player

E Threlkeld

No Correlation

0.3

1 player

P Graham

2 player

E Lamb

Weak Positive Correlation

0.25

1 player

P Graham

2 player

D Collins

Weak Positive Correlation

0.19

1 player

P Graham

2 player

F Morris

No Correlation

1

1 player

P Graham

2 player

P Graham

Strong Positive Correlation

0.5

1 player

P Graham

2 player

A Lister

Positive Correlation

-0.05

1 player

P Graham

2 player

H Emily Jones

No Correlation

0.09

1 player

P Graham

2 player

S Smale

No Correlation

0.38

1 player

A Lister

2 player

T Norris

Weak Positive Correlation

0.34

1 player

A Lister

2 player

E Threlkeld

Weak Positive Correlation

0.28

1 player

A Lister

2 player

E Lamb

Weak Positive Correlation

0.32

1 player

A Lister

2 player

D Collins

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.06

1 player

A Lister

2 player

F Morris

No Correlation

0.5

1 player

A Lister

2 player

P Graham

Positive Correlation

1

1 player

A Lister

2 player

A Lister

Strong Positive Correlation

0.1

1 player

A Lister

2 player

H Emily Jones

No Correlation

0.2

1 player

A Lister

2 player

S Smale

Weak Positive Correlation

0.23

1 player

H Emily Jones

2 player

T Norris

Weak Positive Correlation

0.24

1 player

H Emily Jones

2 player

E Threlkeld

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.1

1 player

H Emily Jones

2 player

E Lamb

No Correlation

0.41

1 player

H Emily Jones

2 player

D Collins

Positive Correlation

-0.18

1 player

H Emily Jones

2 player

F Morris

No Correlation

-0.05

1 player

H Emily Jones

2 player

P Graham

No Correlation

0.1

1 player

H Emily Jones

2 player

A Lister

No Correlation

1

1 player

H Emily Jones

2 player

H Emily Jones

Strong Positive Correlation

0.28

1 player

H Emily Jones

2 player

S Smale

Weak Positive Correlation

0.13

1 player

S Smale

2 player

T Norris

No Correlation

0.23

1 player

S Smale

2 player

E Threlkeld

Weak Positive Correlation

0.39

1 player

S Smale

2 player

E Lamb

Weak Positive Correlation

0.03

1 player

S Smale

2 player

D Collins

No Correlation

-0.02

1 player

S Smale

2 player

F Morris

No Correlation

0.09

1 player

S Smale

2 player

P Graham

No Correlation

0.2

1 player

S Smale

2 player

A Lister

Weak Positive Correlation

0.28

1 player

S Smale

2 player

H Emily Jones

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

S Smale

2 player

S Smale

Strong Positive Correlation

Strong Positive Correlation

No Correlation

Strong Negative Correlation

Pick **S Morris** and **D Collins** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **S Morris** and **H Emily Jones** together

Strong Positive Correlation

Pick **L Heap** and **H Emily Jones** together

Positive Correlation

Similar Perfomance

T Norris 0.43

S Smale 0.39

P Graham 0.3

A Lister 0.28

F Morris 0.24

E Threlkeld 0.09

Opposite Perfomance

H Emily Jones -0.1

D Collins -0.07

Similar Perfomance

T Norris 0.24

E Lamb 0.24

P Graham 0.19

E Threlkeld 0.1

Opposite Perfomance

H Emily Jones -0.18

D Collins -0.09

A Lister -0.06

S Smale -0.02

Similar Perfomance

D Collins 0.36

A Lister 0.34

H Emily Jones 0.24

S Smale 0.23

T Norris 0.2

P Graham 0.14

F Morris 0.1

E Lamb 0.09

Similar Perfomance

P Graham 0.56

E Lamb 0.43

A Lister 0.38

D Collins 0.28

F Morris 0.24

H Emily Jones 0.23

E Threlkeld 0.2

S Smale 0.13

Similar Perfomance

T Norris 0.56

A Lister 0.5

E Lamb 0.3

D Collins 0.25

F Morris 0.19

E Threlkeld 0.14

S Smale 0.09

Opposite Perfomance

H Emily Jones -0.05

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

C Pavely AR CES

C Webb BAT CES

K George AR CES

A Freeborn WK CES

E Jones BAT CES

C Brewer BAT CES

G Davis BOW CES

E Arlott AR CES

G Potts BOW CES

H Baker BOW CES

D Perrin BAT CES

C Pavely

C Webb

K George

A Freeborn

E Jones

C Brewer

G Davis

E Arlott

G Potts

H Baker

D Perrin

1

1 player

C Pavely

2 player

C Pavely

Strong Positive Correlation

0.19

1 player

C Pavely

2 player

C Webb

No Correlation

0.29

1 player

C Pavely

2 player

K George

Weak Positive Correlation

0.17

1 player

C Pavely

2 player

A Freeborn

No Correlation

0.4

1 player

C Pavely

2 player

E Jones

Positive Correlation

0

1 player

C Pavely

2 player

C Brewer

No Correlation

0.32

1 player

C Pavely

2 player

G Davis

Weak Positive Correlation

0.35

1 player

C Pavely

2 player

E Arlott

Weak Positive Correlation

0.27

1 player

C Pavely

2 player

G Potts

Weak Positive Correlation

0.23

1 player

C Pavely

2 player

H Baker

Weak Positive Correlation

0.32

1 player

C Pavely

2 player

D Perrin

Weak Positive Correlation

0.19

1 player

C Webb

2 player

C Pavely

No Correlation

1

1 player

C Webb

2 player

C Webb

Strong Positive Correlation

0.17

1 player

C Webb

2 player

K George

No Correlation

-0.1

1 player

C Webb

2 player

A Freeborn

No Correlation

0.39

1 player

C Webb

2 player

E Jones

Weak Positive Correlation

0.4

1 player

C Webb

2 player

C Brewer

Positive Correlation

0.05

1 player

C Webb

2 player

G Davis

No Correlation

0.01

1 player

C Webb

2 player

E Arlott

No Correlation

0.05

1 player

C Webb

2 player

G Potts

No Correlation

0.45

1 player

C Webb

2 player

H Baker

Positive Correlation

0.4

1 player

C Webb

2 player

D Perrin

Positive Correlation

0.29

1 player

K George

2 player

C Pavely

Weak Positive Correlation

0.17

1 player

K George

2 player

C Webb

No Correlation

1

1 player

K George

2 player

K George

Strong Positive Correlation

0.04

1 player

K George

2 player

A Freeborn

No Correlation

0.48

1 player

K George

2 player

E Jones

Positive Correlation

-0.22

1 player

K George

2 player

C Brewer

Weak Negative Correlation

0.32

1 player

K George

2 player

G Davis

Weak Positive Correlation

0.24

1 player

K George

2 player

E Arlott

Weak Positive Correlation

0.17

1 player

K George

2 player

G Potts

No Correlation

0.19

1 player

K George

2 player

H Baker

No Correlation

0.21

1 player

K George

2 player

D Perrin

Weak Positive Correlation

0.17

1 player

A Freeborn

2 player

C Pavely

No Correlation

-0.1

1 player

A Freeborn

2 player

C Webb

No Correlation

0.04

1 player

A Freeborn

2 player

K George

No Correlation

1

1 player

A Freeborn

2 player

A Freeborn

Strong Positive Correlation

0.25

1 player

A Freeborn

2 player

E Jones

Weak Positive Correlation

0.54

1 player

A Freeborn

2 player

C Brewer

Positive Correlation

0.07

1 player

A Freeborn

2 player

G Davis

No Correlation

-0.03

1 player

A Freeborn

2 player

E Arlott

No Correlation

0.23

1 player

A Freeborn

2 player

G Potts

Weak Positive Correlation

0.07

1 player

A Freeborn

2 player

H Baker

No Correlation

0.31

1 player

A Freeborn

2 player

D Perrin

Weak Positive Correlation

0.4

1 player

E Jones

2 player

C Pavely

Positive Correlation

0.39

1 player

E Jones

2 player

C Webb

Weak Positive Correlation

0.48

1 player

E Jones

2 player

K George

Positive Correlation

0.25

1 player

E Jones

2 player

A Freeborn

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

E Jones

2 player

E Jones

Strong Positive Correlation

0.16

1 player

E Jones

2 player

C Brewer

No Correlation

0.45

1 player

E Jones

2 player

G Davis

Positive Correlation

0.33

1 player

E Jones

2 player

E Arlott

Weak Positive Correlation

0.41

1 player

E Jones

2 player

G Potts

Positive Correlation

0.23

1 player

E Jones

2 player

H Baker

Weak Positive Correlation

0.24

1 player

E Jones

2 player

D Perrin

Weak Positive Correlation

0

1 player

C Brewer

2 player

C Pavely

No Correlation

0.4

1 player

C Brewer

2 player

C Webb

Positive Correlation

-0.22

1 player

C Brewer

2 player

K George

Weak Negative Correlation

0.54

1 player

C Brewer

2 player

A Freeborn

Positive Correlation

0.16

1 player

C Brewer

2 player

E Jones

No Correlation

1

1 player

C Brewer

2 player

C Brewer

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.16

1 player

C Brewer

2 player

G Davis

No Correlation

-0.6

1 player

C Brewer

2 player

E Arlott

Negative Correlation

0.42

1 player

C Brewer

2 player

G Potts

Positive Correlation

0.14

1 player

C Brewer

2 player

H Baker

No Correlation

0.56

1 player

C Brewer

2 player

D Perrin

Positive Correlation

0.32

1 player

G Davis

2 player

C Pavely

Weak Positive Correlation

0.05

1 player

G Davis

2 player

C Webb

No Correlation

0.32

1 player

G Davis

2 player

K George

Weak Positive Correlation

0.07

1 player

G Davis

2 player

A Freeborn

No Correlation

0.45

1 player

G Davis

2 player

E Jones

Positive Correlation

-0.16

1 player

G Davis

2 player

C Brewer

No Correlation

1

1 player

G Davis

2 player

G Davis

Strong Positive Correlation

0.32

1 player

G Davis

2 player

E Arlott

Weak Positive Correlation

0.36

1 player

G Davis

2 player

G Potts

Weak Positive Correlation

0.24

1 player

G Davis

2 player

H Baker

Weak Positive Correlation

0.06

1 player

G Davis

2 player

D Perrin

No Correlation

0.35

1 player

E Arlott

2 player

C Pavely

Weak Positive Correlation

0.01

1 player

E Arlott

2 player

C Webb

No Correlation

0.24

1 player

E Arlott

2 player

K George

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.03

1 player

E Arlott

2 player

A Freeborn

No Correlation

0.33

1 player

E Arlott

2 player

E Jones

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.6

1 player

E Arlott

2 player

C Brewer

Negative Correlation

0.32

1 player

E Arlott

2 player

G Davis

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

E Arlott

2 player

E Arlott

Strong Positive Correlation

0.05

1 player

E Arlott

2 player

G Potts

No Correlation

0.17

1 player

E Arlott

2 player

H Baker

No Correlation

-0.14

1 player

E Arlott

2 player

D Perrin

No Correlation

0.27

1 player

G Potts

2 player

C Pavely

Weak Positive Correlation

0.05

1 player

G Potts

2 player

C Webb

No Correlation

0.17

1 player

G Potts

2 player

K George

No Correlation

0.23

1 player

G Potts

2 player

A Freeborn

Weak Positive Correlation

0.41

1 player

G Potts

2 player

E Jones

Positive Correlation

0.42

1 player

G Potts

2 player

C Brewer

Positive Correlation

0.36

1 player

G Potts

2 player

G Davis

Weak Positive Correlation

0.05

1 player

G Potts

2 player

E Arlott

No Correlation

1

1 player

G Potts

2 player

G Potts

Strong Positive Correlation

0.01

1 player

G Potts

2 player

H Baker

No Correlation

0.32

1 player

G Potts

2 player

D Perrin

Weak Positive Correlation

0.23

1 player

H Baker

2 player

C Pavely

Weak Positive Correlation

0.45

1 player

H Baker

2 player

C Webb

Positive Correlation

0.19

1 player

H Baker

2 player

K George

No Correlation

0.07

1 player

H Baker

2 player

A Freeborn

No Correlation

0.23

1 player

H Baker

2 player

E Jones

Weak Positive Correlation

0.14

1 player

H Baker

2 player

C Brewer

No Correlation

0.24

1 player

H Baker

2 player

G Davis

Weak Positive Correlation

0.17

1 player

H Baker

2 player

E Arlott

No Correlation

0.01

1 player

H Baker

2 player

G Potts

No Correlation

1

1 player

H Baker

2 player

H Baker

Strong Positive Correlation

0.32

1 player

H Baker

2 player

D Perrin

Weak Positive Correlation

0.32

1 player

D Perrin

2 player

C Pavely

Weak Positive Correlation

0.4

1 player

D Perrin

2 player

C Webb

Positive Correlation

0.21

1 player

D Perrin

2 player

K George

Weak Positive Correlation

0.31

1 player

D Perrin

2 player

A Freeborn

Weak Positive Correlation

0.24

1 player

D Perrin

2 player

E Jones

Weak Positive Correlation

0.56

1 player

D Perrin

2 player

C Brewer

Positive Correlation

0.06

1 player

D Perrin

2 player

G Davis

No Correlation

-0.14

1 player

D Perrin

2 player

E Arlott

No Correlation

0.32

1 player

D Perrin

2 player

G Potts

Weak Positive Correlation

0.32

1 player

D Perrin

2 player

H Baker

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

D Perrin

2 player

D Perrin

Strong Positive Correlation

Strong Positive Correlation

No Correlation

Strong Negative Correlation

No data found

Don’t pick ** C Brewer** and **E Arlott** in the same lineup

Negative Correlation

Similar Perfomance

C Pavely 0.35

E Jones 0.33

G Davis 0.32

K George 0.24

H Baker 0.17

G Potts 0.05

C Webb 0.01

Opposite Perfomance

C Brewer -0.6

D Perrin -0.14

A Freeborn -0.03

Similar Perfomance

K George 0.48

G Davis 0.45

G Potts 0.41

C Pavely 0.4

C Webb 0.39

E Arlott 0.33

A Freeborn 0.25

D Perrin 0.24

H Baker 0.23

C Brewer 0.16

Similar Perfomance

C Brewer 0.42

E Jones 0.41

G Davis 0.36

D Perrin 0.32

C Pavely 0.27

A Freeborn 0.23

K George 0.17

C Webb 0.05

E Arlott 0.05

H Baker 0.01

Similar Perfomance

C Brewer 0.54

D Perrin 0.31

E Jones 0.25

G Potts 0.23

C Pavely 0.17

G Davis 0.07

H Baker 0.07

K George 0.04

Opposite Perfomance

C Webb -0.1

E Arlott -0.03

Similar Perfomance

E Jones 0.48

G Davis 0.32

C Pavely 0.29

E Arlott 0.24

D Perrin 0.21

H Baker 0.19

C Webb 0.17

G Potts 0.17

A Freeborn 0.04

Opposite Perfomance

C Brewer -0.22

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

S Morris BOW THDER

T Norris BOW THDER

E Threlkeld WK THDER

E Lamb BAT THDER

D Collins BAT THDER

F Morris AR THDER

P Graham BOW THDER

L Heap BAT THDER

A Lister WK THDER

H Emily Jones BOW THDER

S Smale WK THDER

S Morris

T Norris

E Threlkeld

E Lamb

D Collins

F Morris

P Graham

L Heap

A Lister

H Emily Jones

S Smale

1

1 player

T Norris

2 player

T Norris

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.29

1 player

T Norris

2 player

E Threlkeld

Weak Negative Correlation

0.47

1 player

T Norris

2 player

E Lamb

Positive Correlation

-0.12

1 player

T Norris

2 player

D Collins

No Correlation

-0.12

1 player

T Norris

2 player

F Morris

No Correlation

0.56

1 player

T Norris

2 player

P Graham

Positive Correlation

0.35

1 player

T Norris

2 player

A Lister

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.23

1 player

T Norris

2 player

H Emily Jones

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.09

1 player

T Norris

2 player

S Smale

No Correlation

-0.29

1 player

E Threlkeld

2 player

T Norris

Weak Negative Correlation

1

1 player

E Threlkeld

2 player

E Threlkeld

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.13

1 player

E Threlkeld

2 player

E Lamb

No Correlation

-0.04

1 player

E Threlkeld

2 player

D Collins

No Correlation

-0.26

1 player

E Threlkeld

2 player

F Morris

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.14

1 player

E Threlkeld

2 player

P Graham

No Correlation

0.14

1 player

E Threlkeld

2 player

A Lister

No Correlation

-0.11

1 player

E Threlkeld

2 player

H Emily Jones

No Correlation

0

1 player

E Threlkeld

2 player

S Smale

No Correlation

0.47

1 player

E Lamb

2 player

T Norris

Positive Correlation

-0.13

1 player

E Lamb

2 player

E Threlkeld

No Correlation

1

1 player

E Lamb

2 player

E Lamb

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.62

1 player

E Lamb

2 player

D Collins

Negative Correlation

0.06

1 player

E Lamb

2 player

F Morris

No Correlation

0.14

1 player

E Lamb

2 player

P Graham

No Correlation

-0.14

1 player

E Lamb

2 player

A Lister

No Correlation

-0.14

1 player

E Lamb

2 player

H Emily Jones

No Correlation

0.6

1 player

E Lamb

2 player

S Smale

Positive Correlation

-0.12

1 player

D Collins

2 player

T Norris

No Correlation

-0.04

1 player

D Collins

2 player

E Threlkeld

No Correlation

-0.62

1 player

D Collins

2 player

E Lamb

Negative Correlation

1

1 player

D Collins

2 player

D Collins

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.56

1 player

D Collins

2 player

F Morris

Negative Correlation

-0.08

1 player

D Collins

2 player

P Graham

No Correlation

-0.14

1 player

D Collins

2 player

A Lister

No Correlation

0.5

1 player

D Collins

2 player

H Emily Jones

Positive Correlation

-0.09

1 player

D Collins

2 player

S Smale

No Correlation

-0.12

1 player

F Morris

2 player

T Norris

No Correlation

-0.26

1 player

F Morris

2 player

E Threlkeld

Weak Negative Correlation

0.06

1 player

F Morris

2 player

E Lamb

No Correlation

-0.56

1 player

F Morris

2 player

D Collins

Negative Correlation

1

1 player

F Morris

2 player

F Morris

Strong Positive Correlation

0.11

1 player

F Morris

2 player

P Graham

No Correlation

-0.14

1 player

F Morris

2 player

A Lister

No Correlation

-0.33

1 player

F Morris

2 player

H Emily Jones

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.17

1 player

F Morris

2 player

S Smale

No Correlation

0.56

1 player

P Graham

2 player

T Norris

Positive Correlation

-0.14

1 player

P Graham

2 player

E Threlkeld

No Correlation

0.14

1 player

P Graham

2 player

E Lamb

No Correlation

-0.08

1 player

P Graham

2 player

D Collins

No Correlation

0.11

1 player

P Graham

2 player

F Morris

No Correlation

1

1 player

P Graham

2 player

P Graham

Strong Positive Correlation

0.42

1 player

P Graham

2 player

A Lister

Positive Correlation

-0.7

1 player

P Graham

2 player

H Emily Jones

Negative Correlation

-0.11

1 player

P Graham

2 player

S Smale

No Correlation

0.35

1 player

A Lister

2 player

T Norris

Weak Positive Correlation

0.14

1 player

A Lister

2 player

E Threlkeld

No Correlation

-0.14

1 player

A Lister

2 player

E Lamb

No Correlation

-0.14

1 player

A Lister

2 player

D Collins

No Correlation

-0.14

1 player

A Lister

2 player

F Morris

No Correlation

0.42

1 player

A Lister

2 player

P Graham

Positive Correlation

1

1 player

A Lister

2 player

A Lister

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.35

1 player

A Lister

2 player

H Emily Jones

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.42

1 player

A Lister

2 player

S Smale

Negative Correlation

-0.23

1 player

H Emily Jones

2 player

T Norris

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.11

1 player

H Emily Jones

2 player

E Threlkeld

No Correlation

-0.14

1 player

H Emily Jones

2 player

E Lamb

No Correlation

0.5

1 player

H Emily Jones

2 player

D Collins

Positive Correlation

-0.33

1 player

H Emily Jones

2 player

F Morris

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.7

1 player

H Emily Jones

2 player

P Graham

Negative Correlation

-0.35

1 player

H Emily Jones

2 player

A Lister

Weak Negative Correlation

1

1 player

H Emily Jones

2 player

H Emily Jones

Strong Positive Correlation

0.35

1 player

H Emily Jones

2 player

S Smale

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.09

1 player

S Smale

2 player

T Norris

No Correlation

0

1 player

S Smale

2 player

E Threlkeld

No Correlation

0.6

1 player

S Smale

2 player

E Lamb

Positive Correlation

-0.09

1 player

S Smale

2 player

D Collins

No Correlation

-0.17

1 player

S Smale

2 player

F Morris

No Correlation

-0.11

1 player

S Smale

2 player

P Graham

No Correlation

-0.42

1 player

S Smale

2 player

A Lister

Negative Correlation

0.35

1 player

S Smale

2 player

H Emily Jones

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

S Smale

2 player

S Smale

Strong Positive Correlation

Strong Positive Correlation

No Correlation

Strong Negative Correlation

Pick **E Lamb** and **S Smale** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **S Morris** and **P Graham** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **S Morris** and **A Lister** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **E Lamb** and **D Collins** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **P Graham** and **H Emily Jones** together

Negative Correlation

Similar Perfomance

S Smale 0.6

T Norris 0.47

P Graham 0.14

F Morris 0.06

Opposite Perfomance

D Collins -0.62

A Lister -0.14

H Emily Jones -0.14

E Threlkeld -0.13

Similar Perfomance

P Graham 0.11

E Lamb 0.06

Opposite Perfomance

D Collins -0.56

H Emily Jones -0.33

E Threlkeld -0.26

S Smale -0.17

A Lister -0.14

T Norris -0.12

Similar Perfomance

A Lister 0.14

Opposite Perfomance

T Norris -0.29

F Morris -0.26

P Graham -0.14

E Lamb -0.13

H Emily Jones -0.11

D Collins -0.04

Similar Perfomance

P Graham 0.56

E Lamb 0.47

A Lister 0.35

Opposite Perfomance

E Threlkeld -0.29

H Emily Jones -0.23

D Collins -0.12

F Morris -0.12

S Smale -0.09

Similar Perfomance

T Norris 0.56

A Lister 0.42

E Lamb 0.14

F Morris 0.11

Opposite Perfomance

H Emily Jones -0.7

E Threlkeld -0.14

S Smale -0.11

D Collins -0.08

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

C Pavely AR CES

C Webb BAT CES

K George AR CES

A Freeborn WK CES

E Jones BAT CES

C Brewer BAT CES

G Davis BOW CES

E Arlott AR CES

G Potts BOW CES

H Baker BOW CES

D Perrin BAT CES

C Pavely

C Webb

K George

A Freeborn

E Jones

C Brewer

G Davis

E Arlott

G Potts

H Baker

D Perrin

1

1 player

C Pavely

2 player

C Pavely

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.11

1 player

C Pavely

2 player

C Webb

No Correlation

0.09

1 player

C Pavely

2 player

K George

No Correlation

-0.09

1 player

C Pavely

2 player

A Freeborn

No Correlation

0.5

1 player

C Pavely

2 player

E Jones

Positive Correlation

0

1 player

C Pavely

2 player

C Brewer

No Correlation

-0.27

1 player

C Pavely

2 player

G Davis

Weak Negative Correlation

0.25

1 player

C Pavely

2 player

E Arlott

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.11

1 player

C Pavely

2 player

G Potts

No Correlation

-0.2

1 player

C Pavely

2 player

H Baker

No Correlation

-0.27

1 player

C Pavely

2 player

D Perrin

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.11

1 player

C Webb

2 player

C Pavely

No Correlation

1

1 player

C Webb

2 player

C Webb

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.45

1 player

C Webb

2 player

K George

Negative Correlation

-0.27

1 player

C Webb

2 player

A Freeborn

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.33

1 player

C Webb

2 player

E Jones

Weak Negative Correlation

0.7

1 player

C Webb

2 player

C Brewer

Positive Correlation

-0.64

1 player

C Webb

2 player

G Davis

Negative Correlation

-0.2

1 player

C Webb

2 player

E Arlott

No Correlation

-0.09

1 player

C Webb

2 player

G Potts

No Correlation

0

1 player

C Webb

2 player

H Baker

No Correlation

0.45

1 player

C Webb

2 player

D Perrin

Positive Correlation

0.09

1 player

K George

2 player

C Pavely

No Correlation

-0.45

1 player

K George

2 player

C Webb

Negative Correlation

1

1 player

K George

2 player

K George

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.37

1 player

K George

2 player

A Freeborn

Weak Negative Correlation

0.25

1 player

K George

2 player

E Jones

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.7

1 player

K George

2 player

C Brewer

Negative Correlation

0.18

1 player

K George

2 player

G Davis

No Correlation

0.29

1 player

K George

2 player

E Arlott

Weak Positive Correlation

0.2

1 player

K George

2 player

G Potts

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.12

1 player

K George

2 player

H Baker

No Correlation

-0.41

1 player

K George

2 player

D Perrin

Negative Correlation

-0.09

1 player

A Freeborn

2 player

C Pavely

No Correlation

-0.27

1 player

A Freeborn

2 player

C Webb

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.37

1 player

A Freeborn

2 player

K George

Weak Negative Correlation

1

1 player

A Freeborn

2 player

A Freeborn

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.2

1 player

A Freeborn

2 player

E Jones

No Correlation

0.14

1 player

A Freeborn

2 player

C Brewer

No Correlation

0.16

1 player

A Freeborn

2 player

G Davis

No Correlation

-0.22

1 player

A Freeborn

2 player

E Arlott

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.24

1 player

A Freeborn

2 player

G Potts

Weak Negative Correlation

0

1 player

A Freeborn

2 player

H Baker

No Correlation

0.18

1 player

A Freeborn

2 player

D Perrin

No Correlation

0.5

1 player

E Jones

2 player

C Pavely

Positive Correlation

-0.33

1 player

E Jones

2 player

C Webb

Weak Negative Correlation

0.25

1 player

E Jones

2 player

K George

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.2

1 player

E Jones

2 player

A Freeborn

No Correlation

1

1 player

E Jones

2 player

E Jones

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.14

1 player

E Jones

2 player

C Brewer

No Correlation

0.62

1 player

E Jones

2 player

G Davis

Positive Correlation

0.3

1 player

E Jones

2 player

E Arlott

Weak Positive Correlation

0.4

1 player

E Jones

2 player

G Potts

Positive Correlation

0.14

1 player

E Jones

2 player

H Baker

No Correlation

-0.43

1 player

E Jones

2 player

D Perrin

Negative Correlation

0

1 player

C Brewer

2 player

C Pavely

No Correlation

0.7

1 player

C Brewer

2 player

C Webb

Positive Correlation

-0.7

1 player

C Brewer

2 player

K George

Negative Correlation

0.14

1 player

C Brewer

2 player

A Freeborn

No Correlation

-0.14

1 player

C Brewer

2 player

E Jones

No Correlation

1

1 player

C Brewer

2 player

C Brewer

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.14

1 player

C Brewer

2 player

G Davis

No Correlation

-0.7

1 player

C Brewer

2 player

E Arlott

Negative Correlation

0.35

1 player

C Brewer

2 player

G Potts

Weak Positive Correlation

0.14

1 player

C Brewer

2 player

H Baker

No Correlation

0.14

1 player

C Brewer

2 player

D Perrin

No Correlation

-0.27

1 player

G Davis

2 player

C Pavely

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.64

1 player

G Davis

2 player

C Webb

Negative Correlation

0.18

1 player

G Davis

2 player

K George

No Correlation

0.16

1 player

G Davis

2 player

A Freeborn

No Correlation

0.62

1 player

G Davis

2 player

E Jones

Positive Correlation

-0.14

1 player

G Davis

2 player

C Brewer

No Correlation

1

1 player

G Davis

2 player

G Davis

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.14

1 player

G Davis

2 player

E Arlott

No Correlation

0.29

1 player

G Davis

2 player

G Potts

Weak Positive Correlation

0

1 player

G Davis

2 player

H Baker

No Correlation

-0.29

1 player

G Davis

2 player

D Perrin

Weak Negative Correlation

0.25

1 player

E Arlott

2 player

C Pavely

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.2

1 player

E Arlott

2 player

C Webb

No Correlation

0.29

1 player

E Arlott

2 player

K George

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.22

1 player

E Arlott

2 player

A Freeborn

Weak Negative Correlation

0.3

1 player

E Arlott

2 player

E Jones

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.7

1 player

E Arlott

2 player

C Brewer

Negative Correlation

-0.14

1 player

E Arlott

2 player

G Davis

No Correlation

1

1 player

E Arlott

2 player

E Arlott

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.14

1 player

E Arlott

2 player

G Potts

No Correlation

0

1 player

E Arlott

2 player

H Baker

No Correlation

-0.5

1 player

E Arlott

2 player

D Perrin

Negative Correlation

-0.11

1 player

G Potts

2 player

C Pavely

No Correlation

-0.09

1 player

G Potts

2 player

C Webb

No Correlation

0.2

1 player

G Potts

2 player

K George

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.24

1 player

G Potts

2 player

A Freeborn

Weak Negative Correlation

0.4

1 player

G Potts

2 player

E Jones

Positive Correlation

0.35

1 player

G Potts

2 player

C Brewer

Weak Positive Correlation

0.29

1 player

G Potts

2 player

G Davis

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.14

1 player

G Potts

2 player

E Arlott

No Correlation

1

1 player

G Potts

2 player

G Potts

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.29

1 player

G Potts

2 player

H Baker

Weak Negative Correlation

0.08

1 player

G Potts

2 player

D Perrin

No Correlation

-0.2

1 player

H Baker

2 player

C Pavely

No Correlation

0

1 player

H Baker

2 player

C Webb

No Correlation

-0.12

1 player

H Baker

2 player

K George

No Correlation

0

1 player

H Baker

2 player

A Freeborn

No Correlation

0.14

1 player

H Baker

2 player

E Jones

No Correlation

0.14

1 player

H Baker

2 player

C Brewer

No Correlation

0

1 player

H Baker

2 player

G Davis

No Correlation

0

1 player

H Baker

2 player

E Arlott

No Correlation

-0.29

1 player

H Baker

2 player

G Potts

Weak Negative Correlation

1

1 player

H Baker

2 player

H Baker

Strong Positive Correlation

0.14

1 player

H Baker

2 player

D Perrin

No Correlation

-0.27

1 player

D Perrin

2 player

C Pavely

Weak Negative Correlation

0.45

1 player

D Perrin

2 player

C Webb

Positive Correlation

-0.41

1 player

D Perrin

2 player

K George

Negative Correlation

0.18

1 player

D Perrin

2 player

A Freeborn

No Correlation

-0.43

1 player

D Perrin

2 player

E Jones

Negative Correlation

0.14

1 player

D Perrin

2 player

C Brewer

No Correlation

-0.29

1 player

D Perrin

2 player

G Davis

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.5

1 player

D Perrin

2 player

E Arlott

Negative Correlation

0.08

1 player

D Perrin

2 player

G Potts

No Correlation

0.14

1 player

D Perrin

2 player

H Baker

No Correlation

1

1 player

D Perrin

2 player

D Perrin

Strong Positive Correlation

Strong Positive Correlation

No Correlation

Strong Negative Correlation

Pick **C Webb** and **C Brewer** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **E Jones** and **G Davis** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **C Webb** and **G Davis** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **K George** and **C Brewer** together

Negative Correlation

Similar Perfomance

E Jones 0.3

K George 0.29

C Pavely 0.25

Opposite Perfomance

C Brewer -0.7

D Perrin -0.5

A Freeborn -0.22

C Webb -0.2

G Davis -0.14

G Potts -0.14

Similar Perfomance

G Davis 0.62

C Pavely 0.5

G Potts 0.4

E Arlott 0.3

K George 0.25

H Baker 0.14

Opposite Perfomance

D Perrin -0.43

C Webb -0.33

A Freeborn -0.2

C Brewer -0.14

Similar Perfomance

D Perrin 0.18

G Davis 0.16

C Brewer 0.14

Opposite Perfomance

K George -0.37

C Webb -0.27

G Potts -0.24

E Arlott -0.22

E Jones -0.2

C Pavely -0.09

Similar Perfomance

E Arlott 0.29

E Jones 0.25

G Potts 0.2

G Davis 0.18

C Pavely 0.09

Opposite Perfomance

C Brewer -0.7

C Webb -0.45

D Perrin -0.41

A Freeborn -0.37

H Baker -0.12

Similar Perfomance

E Jones 0.14

C Brewer 0.14

D Perrin 0.14

Opposite Perfomance

G Potts -0.29

C Pavely -0.2

K George -0.12

THDER vs CES