TRN 07 Aug 11:00 pm LON

Lineup Out

Trent Bridge
Mens 100

Best Player Combinations For
TRN vs LON

How it Works?

This guide is super useful for identifying player combinations that are likely to score big. Use the filters to identify the best player combinations according to specific match scenarios.

Player correlate positively

Both players generally perform similarly when picked together. They either score high together or score low together. Maximise FPts by picking players that correlate positively with top players.

Player correlate negatively

Both players generally perform in an opposite manner. If one player scores high, the other usually scores low. Avoid picking players that correlate negatively with top player

Show Player Combinations on the basis of:

Best TRN Player Combinations

Best TRN Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad
J Root BAT TRN
L Gregory AR TRN
T Banton WK TRN
A Lyth BAT TRN
I Wasim AR TRN
S Cook BOW TRN
L Wood BOW TRN
J Turner BOW TRN
R Powell AR TRN
A Hales BAT TRN
Rashid-Khan BOW TRN
J Root
L Gregory
T Banton
A Lyth
I Wasim
S Cook
L Wood
J Turner
R Powell
A Hales
Rashid-Khan
1
1 player
J Root
2 player
J Root
Strong Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
J Root
2 player
L Gregory
Weak Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
J Root
2 player
T Banton
No Correlation
0.6
1 player
J Root
2 player
A Lyth
Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
J Root
2 player
I Wasim
Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
J Root
2 player
S Cook
No Correlation
0.21
1 player
J Root
2 player
L Wood
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
J Root
2 player
J Turner
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
J Root
2 player
R Powell
Weak Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
J Root
2 player
A Hales
Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
J Root
2 player
Rashid-Khan
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
L Gregory
2 player
J Root
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
L Gregory
2 player
L Gregory
Strong Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
L Gregory
2 player
T Banton
Weak Positive Correlation
0.58
1 player
L Gregory
2 player
A Lyth
Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
L Gregory
2 player
I Wasim
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
L Gregory
2 player
S Cook
Weak Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
L Gregory
2 player
L Wood
Positive Correlation
-0.16
1 player
L Gregory
2 player
J Turner
No Correlation
0.44
1 player
L Gregory
2 player
R Powell
Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
L Gregory
2 player
A Hales
Weak Positive Correlation
0.03
1 player
L Gregory
2 player
Rashid-Khan
No Correlation
0.07
1 player
T Banton
2 player
J Root
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
T Banton
2 player
L Gregory
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
T Banton
2 player
T Banton
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.1
1 player
T Banton
2 player
A Lyth
No Correlation
0.31
1 player
T Banton
2 player
I Wasim
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
T Banton
2 player
S Cook
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
T Banton
2 player
L Wood
No Correlation
0
1 player
T Banton
2 player
J Turner
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
T Banton
2 player
R Powell
Weak Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
T Banton
2 player
A Hales
No Correlation
0.32
1 player
T Banton
2 player
Rashid-Khan
Weak Positive Correlation
0.6
1 player
A Lyth
2 player
J Root
Positive Correlation
0.58
1 player
A Lyth
2 player
L Gregory
Positive Correlation
-0.1
1 player
A Lyth
2 player
T Banton
No Correlation
1
1 player
A Lyth
2 player
A Lyth
Strong Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
A Lyth
2 player
I Wasim
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
A Lyth
2 player
S Cook
Weak Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
A Lyth
2 player
L Wood
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
A Lyth
2 player
J Turner
No Correlation
0.85
1 player
A Lyth
2 player
R Powell
Strong Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
A Lyth
2 player
A Hales
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.03
1 player
A Lyth
2 player
Rashid-Khan
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
I Wasim
2 player
J Root
Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
I Wasim
2 player
L Gregory
Weak Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
I Wasim
2 player
T Banton
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
I Wasim
2 player
A Lyth
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
I Wasim
2 player
I Wasim
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.02
1 player
I Wasim
2 player
S Cook
No Correlation
0.46
1 player
I Wasim
2 player
L Wood
Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
I Wasim
2 player
J Turner
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
I Wasim
2 player
R Powell
Weak Positive Correlation
0.37
1 player
I Wasim
2 player
A Hales
Weak Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
I Wasim
2 player
Rashid-Khan
Weak Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
S Cook
2 player
J Root
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
S Cook
2 player
L Gregory
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
S Cook
2 player
T Banton
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
S Cook
2 player
A Lyth
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.02
1 player
S Cook
2 player
I Wasim
No Correlation
1
1 player
S Cook
2 player
S Cook
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.01
1 player
S Cook
2 player
L Wood
No Correlation
0.15
1 player
S Cook
2 player
J Turner
No Correlation
0.56
1 player
S Cook
2 player
R Powell
Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
S Cook
2 player
A Hales
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
S Cook
2 player
Rashid-Khan
No Correlation
0.21
1 player
L Wood
2 player
J Root
Weak Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
L Wood
2 player
L Gregory
Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
L Wood
2 player
T Banton
No Correlation
0.22
1 player
L Wood
2 player
A Lyth
Weak Positive Correlation
0.46
1 player
L Wood
2 player
I Wasim
Positive Correlation
-0.01
1 player
L Wood
2 player
S Cook
No Correlation
1
1 player
L Wood
2 player
L Wood
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.28
1 player
L Wood
2 player
J Turner
Weak Negative Correlation
0.21
1 player
L Wood
2 player
R Powell
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
L Wood
2 player
A Hales
Weak Positive Correlation
0.02
1 player
L Wood
2 player
Rashid-Khan
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
J Turner
2 player
J Root
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.16
1 player
J Turner
2 player
L Gregory
No Correlation
0
1 player
J Turner
2 player
T Banton
No Correlation
0
1 player
J Turner
2 player
A Lyth
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
J Turner
2 player
I Wasim
No Correlation
0.15
1 player
J Turner
2 player
S Cook
No Correlation
-0.28
1 player
J Turner
2 player
L Wood
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
J Turner
2 player
J Turner
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
J Turner
2 player
R Powell
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.2
1 player
J Turner
2 player
A Hales
No Correlation
-0.5
1 player
J Turner
2 player
Rashid-Khan
Negative Correlation
0.23
1 player
R Powell
2 player
J Root
Weak Positive Correlation
0.44
1 player
R Powell
2 player
L Gregory
Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
R Powell
2 player
T Banton
Weak Positive Correlation
0.85
1 player
R Powell
2 player
A Lyth
Strong Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
R Powell
2 player
I Wasim
Weak Positive Correlation
0.56
1 player
R Powell
2 player
S Cook
Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
R Powell
2 player
L Wood
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
R Powell
2 player
J Turner
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
R Powell
2 player
R Powell
Strong Positive Correlation
0.45
1 player
R Powell
2 player
A Hales
Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
R Powell
2 player
Rashid-Khan
Weak Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
A Hales
2 player
J Root
Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
A Hales
2 player
L Gregory
Weak Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
A Hales
2 player
T Banton
No Correlation
0.26
1 player
A Hales
2 player
A Lyth
Weak Positive Correlation
0.37
1 player
A Hales
2 player
I Wasim
Weak Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
A Hales
2 player
S Cook
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
A Hales
2 player
L Wood
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.2
1 player
A Hales
2 player
J Turner
No Correlation
0.45
1 player
A Hales
2 player
R Powell
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
A Hales
2 player
A Hales
Strong Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
A Hales
2 player
Rashid-Khan
Weak Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
Rashid-Khan
2 player
J Root
Weak Positive Correlation
0.03
1 player
Rashid-Khan
2 player
L Gregory
No Correlation
0.32
1 player
Rashid-Khan
2 player
T Banton
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.03
1 player
Rashid-Khan
2 player
A Lyth
No Correlation
0.22
1 player
Rashid-Khan
2 player
I Wasim
Weak Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
Rashid-Khan
2 player
S Cook
No Correlation
0.02
1 player
Rashid-Khan
2 player
L Wood
No Correlation
-0.5
1 player
Rashid-Khan
2 player
J Turner
Negative Correlation
0.22
1 player
Rashid-Khan
2 player
R Powell
Weak Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
Rashid-Khan
2 player
A Hales
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
Rashid-Khan
2 player
Rashid-Khan
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick J Root and A Lyth together
Positive Correlation

Pick A Lyth and R Powell together
Strong Positive Correlation

High Performing Players

1 A Hales

BAT
Similar Perfomance
R Powell 0.45
J Root 0.43
I Wasim 0.37
A Lyth 0.26
Rashid-Khan 0.24
L Gregory 0.21
L Wood 0.2
S Cook 0.17
T Banton 0.15
Opposite Perfomance
J Turner -0.2

2 S Cook

BOW
Similar Perfomance
R Powell 0.56
L Gregory 0.2
A Lyth 0.2
A Hales 0.17
J Turner 0.15
T Banton 0.14
J Root 0.12
Rashid-Khan 0.08
Opposite Perfomance
I Wasim -0.02
L Wood -0.01

3 L Wood

BOW
Similar Perfomance
I Wasim 0.46
L Gregory 0.42
A Lyth 0.22
J Root 0.21
R Powell 0.21
A Hales 0.2
T Banton 0.08
Rashid-Khan 0.02
Opposite Perfomance
J Turner -0.28
S Cook -0.01

4 L Gregory

AR
Similar Perfomance
A Lyth 0.58
R Powell 0.44
L Wood 0.42
T Banton 0.33
J Root 0.25
I Wasim 0.25
A Hales 0.21
S Cook 0.2
Rashid-Khan 0.03
Opposite Perfomance
J Turner -0.16

5 Rashid-Khan

BOW
Similar Perfomance
T Banton 0.32
J Root 0.26
A Hales 0.24
I Wasim 0.22
R Powell 0.22
S Cook 0.08
L Gregory 0.03
L Wood 0.02
Opposite Perfomance
J Turner -0.5
A Lyth -0.03

Best LON Player Combinations

Best LON Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

No data found

No data found

No data found

Best TRN Player Combinations

Best TRN Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

No data found

No data found

High Performing Players

Best LON Player Combinations

Best LON Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad
O Stone BOW LON
N Ellis BOW LON
O Pope BAT LON
D Lawrence BAT LON
R Gleeson BOW LON
L Dawson AR LON
M Pepper WK LON
K Jennings BAT LON
M Critchley AR LON
A Russell AR LON
S Hetmyer BAT LON
O Stone
N Ellis
O Pope
D Lawrence
R Gleeson
L Dawson
M Pepper
K Jennings
M Critchley
A Russell
S Hetmyer
1
1 player
O Stone
2 player
O Stone
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
O Stone
2 player
N Ellis
No Correlation
-0.42
1 player
O Stone
2 player
O Pope
Negative Correlation
0.25
1 player
O Stone
2 player
D Lawrence
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
O Stone
2 player
R Gleeson
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
O Stone
2 player
L Dawson
Weak Negative Correlation
0.25
1 player
O Stone
2 player
M Pepper
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.42
1 player
O Stone
2 player
K Jennings
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
O Stone
2 player
M Critchley
Negative Correlation
-0.25
1 player
O Stone
2 player
A Russell
Weak Negative Correlation
0.5
1 player
O Stone
2 player
S Hetmyer
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
N Ellis
2 player
O Stone
No Correlation
1
1 player
N Ellis
2 player
N Ellis
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
N Ellis
2 player
O Pope
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
N Ellis
2 player
D Lawrence
Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
N Ellis
2 player
R Gleeson
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.18
1 player
N Ellis
2 player
L Dawson
No Correlation
-0.56
1 player
N Ellis
2 player
M Pepper
Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
N Ellis
2 player
K Jennings
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.64
1 player
N Ellis
2 player
M Critchley
Negative Correlation
-0.43
1 player
N Ellis
2 player
A Russell
Negative Correlation
0.67
1 player
N Ellis
2 player
S Hetmyer
Positive Correlation
-0.42
1 player
O Pope
2 player
O Stone
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
O Pope
2 player
N Ellis
No Correlation
1
1 player
O Pope
2 player
O Pope
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
O Pope
2 player
D Lawrence
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
O Pope
2 player
R Gleeson
Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
O Pope
2 player
L Dawson
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
O Pope
2 player
M Pepper
No Correlation
0
1 player
O Pope
2 player
K Jennings
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
O Pope
2 player
M Critchley
Weak Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
O Pope
2 player
A Russell
Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
O Pope
2 player
S Hetmyer
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
D Lawrence
2 player
O Stone
Weak Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
D Lawrence
2 player
N Ellis
Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
D Lawrence
2 player
O Pope
No Correlation
1
1 player
D Lawrence
2 player
D Lawrence
Strong Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
D Lawrence
2 player
R Gleeson
No Correlation
-0.39
1 player
D Lawrence
2 player
L Dawson
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
D Lawrence
2 player
M Pepper
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
D Lawrence
2 player
K Jennings
Negative Correlation
-0.29
1 player
D Lawrence
2 player
M Critchley
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.5
1 player
D Lawrence
2 player
A Russell
Negative Correlation
0.25
1 player
D Lawrence
2 player
S Hetmyer
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
R Gleeson
2 player
O Stone
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
R Gleeson
2 player
N Ellis
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
R Gleeson
2 player
O Pope
Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
R Gleeson
2 player
D Lawrence
No Correlation
1
1 player
R Gleeson
2 player
R Gleeson
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.42
1 player
R Gleeson
2 player
L Dawson
Negative Correlation
0.23
1 player
R Gleeson
2 player
M Pepper
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
R Gleeson
2 player
K Jennings
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
R Gleeson
2 player
M Critchley
Weak Negative Correlation
0.23
1 player
R Gleeson
2 player
A Russell
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
R Gleeson
2 player
S Hetmyer
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
L Dawson
2 player
O Stone
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.18
1 player
L Dawson
2 player
N Ellis
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
L Dawson
2 player
O Pope
No Correlation
-0.39
1 player
L Dawson
2 player
D Lawrence
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.42
1 player
L Dawson
2 player
R Gleeson
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
L Dawson
2 player
L Dawson
Strong Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
L Dawson
2 player
M Pepper
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
L Dawson
2 player
K Jennings
No Correlation
0.29
1 player
L Dawson
2 player
M Critchley
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.11
1 player
L Dawson
2 player
A Russell
No Correlation
-0.75
1 player
L Dawson
2 player
S Hetmyer
Negative Correlation
0.25
1 player
M Pepper
2 player
O Stone
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.56
1 player
M Pepper
2 player
N Ellis
Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
M Pepper
2 player
O Pope
No Correlation
0
1 player
M Pepper
2 player
D Lawrence
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
M Pepper
2 player
R Gleeson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
M Pepper
2 player
L Dawson
No Correlation
1
1 player
M Pepper
2 player
M Pepper
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
M Pepper
2 player
K Jennings
No Correlation
-0.25
1 player
M Pepper
2 player
M Critchley
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
M Pepper
2 player
A Russell
No Correlation
-0.25
1 player
M Pepper
2 player
S Hetmyer
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.42
1 player
K Jennings
2 player
O Stone
Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
K Jennings
2 player
N Ellis
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
K Jennings
2 player
O Pope
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
K Jennings
2 player
D Lawrence
Negative Correlation
0.23
1 player
K Jennings
2 player
R Gleeson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
K Jennings
2 player
L Dawson
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
K Jennings
2 player
M Pepper
No Correlation
1
1 player
K Jennings
2 player
K Jennings
Strong Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
K Jennings
2 player
M Critchley
Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
K Jennings
2 player
A Russell
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
K Jennings
2 player
S Hetmyer
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
M Critchley
2 player
O Stone
Negative Correlation
-0.64
1 player
M Critchley
2 player
N Ellis
Negative Correlation
0.35
1 player
M Critchley
2 player
O Pope
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.29
1 player
M Critchley
2 player
D Lawrence
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.35
1 player
M Critchley
2 player
R Gleeson
Weak Negative Correlation
0.29
1 player
M Critchley
2 player
L Dawson
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
M Critchley
2 player
M Pepper
Weak Negative Correlation
0.42
1 player
M Critchley
2 player
K Jennings
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M Critchley
2 player
M Critchley
Strong Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
M Critchley
2 player
A Russell
Positive Correlation
-0.42
1 player
M Critchley
2 player
S Hetmyer
Negative Correlation
-0.25
1 player
A Russell
2 player
O Stone
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.43
1 player
A Russell
2 player
N Ellis
Negative Correlation
0.42
1 player
A Russell
2 player
O Pope
Positive Correlation
-0.5
1 player
A Russell
2 player
D Lawrence
Negative Correlation
0.23
1 player
A Russell
2 player
R Gleeson
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.11
1 player
A Russell
2 player
L Dawson
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Russell
2 player
M Pepper
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
A Russell
2 player
K Jennings
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
A Russell
2 player
M Critchley
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
A Russell
2 player
A Russell
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
A Russell
2 player
S Hetmyer
Weak Negative Correlation
0.5
1 player
S Hetmyer
2 player
O Stone
Positive Correlation
0.67
1 player
S Hetmyer
2 player
N Ellis
Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
S Hetmyer
2 player
O Pope
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
S Hetmyer
2 player
D Lawrence
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
S Hetmyer
2 player
R Gleeson
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.75
1 player
S Hetmyer
2 player
L Dawson
Negative Correlation
-0.25
1 player
S Hetmyer
2 player
M Pepper
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
S Hetmyer
2 player
K Jennings
No Correlation
-0.42
1 player
S Hetmyer
2 player
M Critchley
Negative Correlation
-0.25
1 player
S Hetmyer
2 player
A Russell
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
S Hetmyer
2 player
S Hetmyer
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick N Ellis and S Hetmyer together
Positive Correlation

Pick O Stone and M Critchley together
Negative Correlation

Pick N Ellis and M Critchley together
Negative Correlation

Pick O Pope and R Gleeson together
Negative Correlation

Pick D Lawrence and K Jennings together
Negative Correlation

Pick L Dawson and S Hetmyer together
Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 L Dawson

AR
Similar Perfomance
M Critchley 0.29
M Pepper 0.17
K Jennings 0.14
Opposite Perfomance
S Hetmyer -0.75
R Gleeson -0.42
D Lawrence -0.39
O Stone -0.25
N Ellis -0.18
O Pope -0.14
A Russell -0.11

2 D Lawrence

BAT
Similar Perfomance
N Ellis 0.5
O Stone 0.25
S Hetmyer 0.25
R Gleeson 0.14
Opposite Perfomance
K Jennings -0.7
A Russell -0.5
L Dawson -0.39
M Critchley -0.29
O Pope -0.14

3 N Ellis

BOW
Similar Perfomance
S Hetmyer 0.67
D Lawrence 0.5
Opposite Perfomance
M Critchley -0.64
M Pepper -0.56
A Russell -0.43
R Gleeson -0.23
K Jennings -0.23
L Dawson -0.18

4 M Critchley

AR
Similar Perfomance
K Jennings 0.42
A Russell 0.42
O Pope 0.35
L Dawson 0.29
Opposite Perfomance
O Stone -0.7
N Ellis -0.64
S Hetmyer -0.42
R Gleeson -0.35
D Lawrence -0.29
M Pepper -0.25

5 M Pepper

WK
Similar Perfomance
O Stone 0.25
R Gleeson 0.23
L Dawson 0.17
O Pope 0.14
Opposite Perfomance
N Ellis -0.56
M Critchley -0.25
S Hetmyer -0.25
K Jennings -0.14

PerfectLineup © 2024. All Rights Reserved