TIT 19 Apr 09:30 pm LIO

Lineup Out

SuperSport Park, Centurion
CSA T20 Challenge

Best Player Combinations For
TTN vs LIO

How it Works?

This guide is super useful for identifying player combinations that are likely to score big. Use the filters to identify the best player combinations according to specific match scenarios.

Player correlate positively

Both players generally perform similarly when picked together. They either score high together or score low together. Maximise FPts by picking players that correlate positively with top players.

Player correlate negatively

Both players generally perform in an opposite manner. If one player scores high, the other usually scores low. Avoid picking players that correlate negatively with top player

Show Player Combinations on the basis of:

Best TTN Player Combinations

Best TTN Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad
L Pretorius WK TTN
Jack Lees AR TTN
N Brand AR TTN
D Wiese AR TTN
R Moonsamy WK TTN
L Ngidi BOW TTN
C Bosch BAT TTN
D Galiem AR TTN
S Makhanya BAT TTN
J Dala BOW TTN
T Shamsi BOW TTN
L Pretorius
Jack Lees
N Brand
D Wiese
R Moonsamy
L Ngidi
C Bosch
D Galiem
S Makhanya
J Dala
T Shamsi
1
1 player
L Pretorius
2 player
L Pretorius
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
L Pretorius
2 player
Jack Lees
Weak Negative Correlation
0.54
1 player
L Pretorius
2 player
N Brand
Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
L Pretorius
2 player
D Wiese
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
L Pretorius
2 player
R Moonsamy
Weak Positive Correlation
0.37
1 player
L Pretorius
2 player
L Ngidi
Weak Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
L Pretorius
2 player
C Bosch
Weak Positive Correlation
0.51
1 player
L Pretorius
2 player
D Galiem
Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
L Pretorius
2 player
S Makhanya
No Correlation
0.22
1 player
L Pretorius
2 player
J Dala
Weak Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
L Pretorius
2 player
T Shamsi
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
Jack Lees
2 player
L Pretorius
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
Jack Lees
2 player
Jack Lees
Strong Positive Correlation
0.55
1 player
Jack Lees
2 player
N Brand
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
Jack Lees
2 player
D Wiese
No Correlation
0.27
1 player
Jack Lees
2 player
R Moonsamy
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
Jack Lees
2 player
L Ngidi
Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
Jack Lees
2 player
C Bosch
Weak Negative Correlation
-1
1 player
Jack Lees
2 player
D Galiem
Strong Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
Jack Lees
2 player
S Makhanya
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.13
1 player
Jack Lees
2 player
J Dala
No Correlation
-0.57
1 player
Jack Lees
2 player
T Shamsi
Negative Correlation
0.54
1 player
N Brand
2 player
L Pretorius
Positive Correlation
0.55
1 player
N Brand
2 player
Jack Lees
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
N Brand
2 player
N Brand
Strong Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
N Brand
2 player
D Wiese
Positive Correlation
0.37
1 player
N Brand
2 player
R Moonsamy
Weak Positive Correlation
0.02
1 player
N Brand
2 player
L Ngidi
No Correlation
0.19
1 player
N Brand
2 player
C Bosch
No Correlation
0.18
1 player
N Brand
2 player
D Galiem
No Correlation
0.24
1 player
N Brand
2 player
S Makhanya
Weak Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
N Brand
2 player
J Dala
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
N Brand
2 player
T Shamsi
No Correlation
0.3
1 player
D Wiese
2 player
L Pretorius
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
D Wiese
2 player
Jack Lees
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
D Wiese
2 player
N Brand
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
D Wiese
2 player
D Wiese
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.02
1 player
D Wiese
2 player
R Moonsamy
No Correlation
0.1
1 player
D Wiese
2 player
L Ngidi
No Correlation
0.07
1 player
D Wiese
2 player
C Bosch
No Correlation
0.07
1 player
D Wiese
2 player
D Galiem
No Correlation
0.1
1 player
D Wiese
2 player
S Makhanya
No Correlation
0.13
1 player
D Wiese
2 player
J Dala
No Correlation
-0.05
1 player
D Wiese
2 player
T Shamsi
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
R Moonsamy
2 player
L Pretorius
Weak Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
R Moonsamy
2 player
Jack Lees
Weak Positive Correlation
0.37
1 player
R Moonsamy
2 player
N Brand
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.02
1 player
R Moonsamy
2 player
D Wiese
No Correlation
1
1 player
R Moonsamy
2 player
R Moonsamy
Strong Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
R Moonsamy
2 player
L Ngidi
No Correlation
0.36
1 player
R Moonsamy
2 player
C Bosch
Weak Positive Correlation
0.04
1 player
R Moonsamy
2 player
D Galiem
No Correlation
0.22
1 player
R Moonsamy
2 player
S Makhanya
Weak Positive Correlation
0.46
1 player
R Moonsamy
2 player
J Dala
Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
R Moonsamy
2 player
T Shamsi
Weak Positive Correlation
0.37
1 player
L Ngidi
2 player
L Pretorius
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
L Ngidi
2 player
Jack Lees
Negative Correlation
0.02
1 player
L Ngidi
2 player
N Brand
No Correlation
0.1
1 player
L Ngidi
2 player
D Wiese
No Correlation
0.12
1 player
L Ngidi
2 player
R Moonsamy
No Correlation
1
1 player
L Ngidi
2 player
L Ngidi
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.03
1 player
L Ngidi
2 player
C Bosch
No Correlation
0.47
1 player
L Ngidi
2 player
D Galiem
Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
L Ngidi
2 player
S Makhanya
No Correlation
0.47
1 player
L Ngidi
2 player
J Dala
Positive Correlation
0.63
1 player
L Ngidi
2 player
T Shamsi
Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
C Bosch
2 player
L Pretorius
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
C Bosch
2 player
Jack Lees
Weak Negative Correlation
0.19
1 player
C Bosch
2 player
N Brand
No Correlation
0.07
1 player
C Bosch
2 player
D Wiese
No Correlation
0.36
1 player
C Bosch
2 player
R Moonsamy
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.03
1 player
C Bosch
2 player
L Ngidi
No Correlation
1
1 player
C Bosch
2 player
C Bosch
Strong Positive Correlation
0.29
1 player
C Bosch
2 player
D Galiem
Weak Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
C Bosch
2 player
S Makhanya
No Correlation
0.13
1 player
C Bosch
2 player
J Dala
No Correlation
0.21
1 player
C Bosch
2 player
T Shamsi
Weak Positive Correlation
0.51
1 player
D Galiem
2 player
L Pretorius
Positive Correlation
-1
1 player
D Galiem
2 player
Jack Lees
Strong Negative Correlation
0.18
1 player
D Galiem
2 player
N Brand
No Correlation
0.07
1 player
D Galiem
2 player
D Wiese
No Correlation
0.04
1 player
D Galiem
2 player
R Moonsamy
No Correlation
0.47
1 player
D Galiem
2 player
L Ngidi
Positive Correlation
0.29
1 player
D Galiem
2 player
C Bosch
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
D Galiem
2 player
D Galiem
Strong Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
D Galiem
2 player
S Makhanya
No Correlation
0.32
1 player
D Galiem
2 player
J Dala
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
D Galiem
2 player
T Shamsi
No Correlation
0.12
1 player
S Makhanya
2 player
L Pretorius
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
S Makhanya
2 player
Jack Lees
Weak Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
S Makhanya
2 player
N Brand
Weak Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
S Makhanya
2 player
D Wiese
No Correlation
0.22
1 player
S Makhanya
2 player
R Moonsamy
Weak Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
S Makhanya
2 player
L Ngidi
No Correlation
0.12
1 player
S Makhanya
2 player
C Bosch
No Correlation
0.17
1 player
S Makhanya
2 player
D Galiem
No Correlation
1
1 player
S Makhanya
2 player
S Makhanya
Strong Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
S Makhanya
2 player
J Dala
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
S Makhanya
2 player
T Shamsi
No Correlation
0.22
1 player
J Dala
2 player
L Pretorius
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.13
1 player
J Dala
2 player
Jack Lees
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
J Dala
2 player
N Brand
No Correlation
0.13
1 player
J Dala
2 player
D Wiese
No Correlation
0.46
1 player
J Dala
2 player
R Moonsamy
Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
J Dala
2 player
L Ngidi
Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
J Dala
2 player
C Bosch
No Correlation
0.32
1 player
J Dala
2 player
D Galiem
Weak Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
J Dala
2 player
S Makhanya
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
J Dala
2 player
J Dala
Strong Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
J Dala
2 player
T Shamsi
Weak Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
T Shamsi
2 player
L Pretorius
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.57
1 player
T Shamsi
2 player
Jack Lees
Negative Correlation
0.11
1 player
T Shamsi
2 player
N Brand
No Correlation
-0.05
1 player
T Shamsi
2 player
D Wiese
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
T Shamsi
2 player
R Moonsamy
Weak Positive Correlation
0.63
1 player
T Shamsi
2 player
L Ngidi
Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
T Shamsi
2 player
C Bosch
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
T Shamsi
2 player
D Galiem
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
T Shamsi
2 player
S Makhanya
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
T Shamsi
2 player
J Dala
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
T Shamsi
2 player
T Shamsi
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick L Ngidi and T Shamsi together
Positive Correlation

Don’t Pick Jack Lees and L Ngidi together
Negative Correlation

Don’t Pick Jack Lees and D Galiem together
Strong Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 J Dala

BOW
Similar Perfomance
L Ngidi 0.47
R Moonsamy 0.46
D Galiem 0.32
S Makhanya 0.26
T Shamsi 0.25
L Pretorius 0.22
D Wiese 0.13
C Bosch 0.13
N Brand 0.08
Opposite Perfomance
Jack Lees -0.13

2 N Brand

AR
Similar Perfomance
Jack Lees 0.55
L Pretorius 0.54
D Wiese 0.42
R Moonsamy 0.37
S Makhanya 0.24
C Bosch 0.19
D Galiem 0.18
T Shamsi 0.11
J Dala 0.08
L Ngidi 0.02

3 S Makhanya

BAT
Similar Perfomance
Jack Lees 0.33
J Dala 0.26
N Brand 0.24
R Moonsamy 0.22
L Ngidi 0.18
D Galiem 0.17
T Shamsi 0.14
L Pretorius 0.12
C Bosch 0.12
D Wiese 0.1

4 D Galiem

AR
Similar Perfomance
L Pretorius 0.51
L Ngidi 0.47
J Dala 0.32
C Bosch 0.29
N Brand 0.18
S Makhanya 0.17
T Shamsi 0.14
D Wiese 0.07
R Moonsamy 0.04
Opposite Perfomance
Jack Lees -1

5 T Shamsi

BOW
Similar Perfomance
L Ngidi 0.63
L Pretorius 0.39
R Moonsamy 0.25
J Dala 0.25
C Bosch 0.21
D Galiem 0.14
S Makhanya 0.14
N Brand 0.11
Opposite Perfomance
Jack Lees -0.57
D Wiese -0.05

Best LIO Player Combinations

Best LIO Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad
D Potgieter AR LIO
T Moreki BOW LIO
T Bavuma BAT LIO
R Rickelton WK LIO
R Hendricks BAT LIO
B Fortuin BOW LIO
C Yusuf BOW LIO
E Jones AR LIO
N Peter BOW LIO
W Mulder AR LIO
R van der Dussen BAT LIO
D Potgieter
T Moreki
T Bavuma
R Rickelton
R Hendricks
B Fortuin
C Yusuf
E Jones
N Peter
W Mulder
R van der Dussen
1
1 player
D Potgieter
2 player
D Potgieter
Strong Positive Correlation
0.55
1 player
D Potgieter
2 player
T Moreki
Positive Correlation
0.16
1 player
D Potgieter
2 player
T Bavuma
No Correlation
0.37
1 player
D Potgieter
2 player
R Rickelton
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.08
1 player
D Potgieter
2 player
R Hendricks
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
D Potgieter
2 player
B Fortuin
Weak Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
D Potgieter
2 player
C Yusuf
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
D Potgieter
2 player
E Jones
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.4
1 player
D Potgieter
2 player
N Peter
Weak Negative Correlation
0.04
1 player
D Potgieter
2 player
W Mulder
No Correlation
0.1
1 player
D Potgieter
2 player
R van der Dussen
No Correlation
0.55
1 player
T Moreki
2 player
D Potgieter
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
T Moreki
2 player
T Moreki
Strong Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
T Moreki
2 player
T Bavuma
No Correlation
0.6
1 player
T Moreki
2 player
R Rickelton
Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
T Moreki
2 player
R Hendricks
Weak Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
T Moreki
2 player
B Fortuin
Positive Correlation
-0.2
1 player
T Moreki
2 player
C Yusuf
No Correlation
0.07
1 player
T Moreki
2 player
E Jones
No Correlation
-0.15
1 player
T Moreki
2 player
N Peter
No Correlation
-0.52
1 player
T Moreki
2 player
W Mulder
Negative Correlation
0.42
1 player
T Moreki
2 player
R van der Dussen
Positive Correlation
0.16
1 player
T Bavuma
2 player
D Potgieter
No Correlation
0.1
1 player
T Bavuma
2 player
T Moreki
No Correlation
1
1 player
T Bavuma
2 player
T Bavuma
Strong Positive Correlation
0.05
1 player
T Bavuma
2 player
R Rickelton
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
T Bavuma
2 player
R Hendricks
No Correlation
0.02
1 player
T Bavuma
2 player
B Fortuin
No Correlation
0.36
1 player
T Bavuma
2 player
C Yusuf
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.07
1 player
T Bavuma
2 player
E Jones
No Correlation
-0.05
1 player
T Bavuma
2 player
N Peter
No Correlation
-0.04
1 player
T Bavuma
2 player
W Mulder
No Correlation
0.44
1 player
T Bavuma
2 player
R van der Dussen
Positive Correlation
0.37
1 player
R Rickelton
2 player
D Potgieter
Weak Positive Correlation
0.6
1 player
R Rickelton
2 player
T Moreki
Positive Correlation
0.05
1 player
R Rickelton
2 player
T Bavuma
No Correlation
1
1 player
R Rickelton
2 player
R Rickelton
Strong Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
R Rickelton
2 player
R Hendricks
Weak Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
R Rickelton
2 player
B Fortuin
Weak Positive Correlation
0.52
1 player
R Rickelton
2 player
C Yusuf
Positive Correlation
0.45
1 player
R Rickelton
2 player
E Jones
Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
R Rickelton
2 player
N Peter
Weak Positive Correlation
0.19
1 player
R Rickelton
2 player
W Mulder
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
R Rickelton
2 player
R van der Dussen
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.08
1 player
R Hendricks
2 player
D Potgieter
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
R Hendricks
2 player
T Moreki
Weak Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
R Hendricks
2 player
T Bavuma
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
R Hendricks
2 player
R Rickelton
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
R Hendricks
2 player
R Hendricks
Strong Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
R Hendricks
2 player
B Fortuin
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.11
1 player
R Hendricks
2 player
C Yusuf
No Correlation
0.32
1 player
R Hendricks
2 player
E Jones
Weak Positive Correlation
0.49
1 player
R Hendricks
2 player
N Peter
Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
R Hendricks
2 player
W Mulder
No Correlation
-0.26
1 player
R Hendricks
2 player
R van der Dussen
Weak Negative Correlation
0.2
1 player
B Fortuin
2 player
D Potgieter
Weak Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
B Fortuin
2 player
T Moreki
Positive Correlation
0.02
1 player
B Fortuin
2 player
T Bavuma
No Correlation
0.3
1 player
B Fortuin
2 player
R Rickelton
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
B Fortuin
2 player
R Hendricks
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
B Fortuin
2 player
B Fortuin
Strong Positive Correlation
0.29
1 player
B Fortuin
2 player
C Yusuf
Weak Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
B Fortuin
2 player
E Jones
No Correlation
0.37
1 player
B Fortuin
2 player
N Peter
Weak Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
B Fortuin
2 player
W Mulder
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
B Fortuin
2 player
R van der Dussen
No Correlation
0.12
1 player
C Yusuf
2 player
D Potgieter
No Correlation
-0.2
1 player
C Yusuf
2 player
T Moreki
No Correlation
0.36
1 player
C Yusuf
2 player
T Bavuma
Weak Positive Correlation
0.52
1 player
C Yusuf
2 player
R Rickelton
Positive Correlation
-0.11
1 player
C Yusuf
2 player
R Hendricks
No Correlation
0.29
1 player
C Yusuf
2 player
B Fortuin
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
C Yusuf
2 player
C Yusuf
Strong Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
C Yusuf
2 player
E Jones
Weak Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
C Yusuf
2 player
N Peter
No Correlation
0.27
1 player
C Yusuf
2 player
W Mulder
Weak Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
C Yusuf
2 player
R van der Dussen
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
E Jones
2 player
D Potgieter
Weak Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
E Jones
2 player
T Moreki
No Correlation
-0.07
1 player
E Jones
2 player
T Bavuma
No Correlation
0.45
1 player
E Jones
2 player
R Rickelton
Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
E Jones
2 player
R Hendricks
Weak Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
E Jones
2 player
B Fortuin
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
E Jones
2 player
C Yusuf
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
E Jones
2 player
E Jones
Strong Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
E Jones
2 player
N Peter
Positive Correlation
0.46
1 player
E Jones
2 player
W Mulder
Positive Correlation
-0.3
1 player
E Jones
2 player
R van der Dussen
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.4
1 player
N Peter
2 player
D Potgieter
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.15
1 player
N Peter
2 player
T Moreki
No Correlation
-0.05
1 player
N Peter
2 player
T Bavuma
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
N Peter
2 player
R Rickelton
Weak Positive Correlation
0.49
1 player
N Peter
2 player
R Hendricks
Positive Correlation
0.37
1 player
N Peter
2 player
B Fortuin
Weak Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
N Peter
2 player
C Yusuf
No Correlation
0.47
1 player
N Peter
2 player
E Jones
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
N Peter
2 player
N Peter
Strong Positive Correlation
0.16
1 player
N Peter
2 player
W Mulder
No Correlation
0.03
1 player
N Peter
2 player
R van der Dussen
No Correlation
0.04
1 player
W Mulder
2 player
D Potgieter
No Correlation
-0.52
1 player
W Mulder
2 player
T Moreki
Negative Correlation
-0.04
1 player
W Mulder
2 player
T Bavuma
No Correlation
0.19
1 player
W Mulder
2 player
R Rickelton
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
W Mulder
2 player
R Hendricks
No Correlation
0.22
1 player
W Mulder
2 player
B Fortuin
Weak Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
W Mulder
2 player
C Yusuf
Weak Positive Correlation
0.46
1 player
W Mulder
2 player
E Jones
Positive Correlation
0.16
1 player
W Mulder
2 player
N Peter
No Correlation
1
1 player
W Mulder
2 player
W Mulder
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.26
1 player
W Mulder
2 player
R van der Dussen
Weak Negative Correlation
0.1
1 player
R van der Dussen
2 player
D Potgieter
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
R van der Dussen
2 player
T Moreki
Positive Correlation
0.44
1 player
R van der Dussen
2 player
T Bavuma
Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
R van der Dussen
2 player
R Rickelton
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.26
1 player
R van der Dussen
2 player
R Hendricks
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
R van der Dussen
2 player
B Fortuin
No Correlation
0.1
1 player
R van der Dussen
2 player
C Yusuf
No Correlation
-0.3
1 player
R van der Dussen
2 player
E Jones
Weak Negative Correlation
0.03
1 player
R van der Dussen
2 player
N Peter
No Correlation
-0.26
1 player
R van der Dussen
2 player
W Mulder
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
R van der Dussen
2 player
R van der Dussen
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick T Moreki and R Rickelton together
Positive Correlation

High Performing Players

1 R Hendricks

BAT
Similar Perfomance
N Peter 0.49
T Moreki 0.35
E Jones 0.32
B Fortuin 0.25
R Rickelton 0.23
W Mulder 0.14
T Bavuma 0.11
Opposite Perfomance
R van der Dussen -0.26
C Yusuf -0.11
D Potgieter -0.08

2 E Jones

AR
Similar Perfomance
N Peter 0.47
W Mulder 0.46
R Rickelton 0.45
R Hendricks 0.32
C Yusuf 0.28
D Potgieter 0.2
B Fortuin 0.12
T Moreki 0.07
Opposite Perfomance
R van der Dussen -0.3
T Bavuma -0.07

3 W Mulder

AR
Similar Perfomance
E Jones 0.46
C Yusuf 0.27
B Fortuin 0.22
R Rickelton 0.19
N Peter 0.16
R Hendricks 0.14
D Potgieter 0.04
Opposite Perfomance
T Moreki -0.52
R van der Dussen -0.26
T Bavuma -0.04

4 B Fortuin

BOW
Similar Perfomance
T Moreki 0.5
N Peter 0.37
R Rickelton 0.3
C Yusuf 0.29
R Hendricks 0.25
W Mulder 0.22
D Potgieter 0.2
E Jones 0.12
T Bavuma 0.02
Opposite Perfomance
R van der Dussen -0.14

5 R Rickelton

WK
Similar Perfomance
T Moreki 0.6
C Yusuf 0.52
E Jones 0.45
D Potgieter 0.37
B Fortuin 0.3
R van der Dussen 0.25
R Hendricks 0.23
N Peter 0.2
W Mulder 0.19
T Bavuma 0.05

Best TTN Player Combinations

Best TTN Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

No data found

No data found

High Performing Players

Best LIO Player Combinations

Best LIO Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad
D Potgieter AR LIO
T Moreki BOW LIO
T Bavuma BAT LIO
R Rickelton WK LIO
R Hendricks BAT LIO
B Fortuin BOW LIO
C Yusuf BOW LIO
E Jones AR LIO
N Peter BOW LIO
W Mulder AR LIO
R van der Dussen BAT LIO
D Potgieter
T Moreki
T Bavuma
R Rickelton
R Hendricks
B Fortuin
C Yusuf
E Jones
N Peter
W Mulder
R van der Dussen
1
1 player
D Potgieter
2 player
D Potgieter
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
D Potgieter
2 player
T Moreki
No Correlation
-0.25
1 player
D Potgieter
2 player
T Bavuma
Weak Negative Correlation
0.2
1 player
D Potgieter
2 player
R Rickelton
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.56
1 player
D Potgieter
2 player
R Hendricks
Negative Correlation
0.11
1 player
D Potgieter
2 player
B Fortuin
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
D Potgieter
2 player
C Yusuf
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.42
1 player
D Potgieter
2 player
E Jones
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
D Potgieter
2 player
N Peter
Negative Correlation
-0.2
1 player
D Potgieter
2 player
W Mulder
No Correlation
-0.11
1 player
D Potgieter
2 player
R van der Dussen
No Correlation
0
1 player
T Moreki
2 player
D Potgieter
No Correlation
1
1 player
T Moreki
2 player
T Moreki
Strong Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
T Moreki
2 player
T Bavuma
Weak Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
T Moreki
2 player
R Rickelton
Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
T Moreki
2 player
R Hendricks
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
T Moreki
2 player
B Fortuin
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
T Moreki
2 player
C Yusuf
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
T Moreki
2 player
E Jones
No Correlation
0
1 player
T Moreki
2 player
N Peter
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
T Moreki
2 player
W Mulder
Negative Correlation
0.35
1 player
T Moreki
2 player
R van der Dussen
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
T Bavuma
2 player
D Potgieter
Weak Negative Correlation
0.23
1 player
T Bavuma
2 player
T Moreki
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
T Bavuma
2 player
T Bavuma
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.27
1 player
T Bavuma
2 player
R Rickelton
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
T Bavuma
2 player
R Hendricks
No Correlation
-0.12
1 player
T Bavuma
2 player
B Fortuin
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
T Bavuma
2 player
C Yusuf
No Correlation
-0.45
1 player
T Bavuma
2 player
E Jones
Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
T Bavuma
2 player
N Peter
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
T Bavuma
2 player
W Mulder
Weak Negative Correlation
0.83
1 player
T Bavuma
2 player
R van der Dussen
Strong Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
R Rickelton
2 player
D Potgieter
Weak Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
R Rickelton
2 player
T Moreki
Positive Correlation
-0.27
1 player
R Rickelton
2 player
T Bavuma
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
R Rickelton
2 player
R Rickelton
Strong Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
R Rickelton
2 player
R Hendricks
No Correlation
0.17
1 player
R Rickelton
2 player
B Fortuin
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
R Rickelton
2 player
C Yusuf
No Correlation
0.45
1 player
R Rickelton
2 player
E Jones
Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
R Rickelton
2 player
N Peter
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
R Rickelton
2 player
W Mulder
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
R Rickelton
2 player
R van der Dussen
No Correlation
-0.56
1 player
R Hendricks
2 player
D Potgieter
Negative Correlation
0.23
1 player
R Hendricks
2 player
T Moreki
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
R Hendricks
2 player
T Bavuma
No Correlation
0.17
1 player
R Hendricks
2 player
R Rickelton
No Correlation
1
1 player
R Hendricks
2 player
R Hendricks
Strong Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
R Hendricks
2 player
B Fortuin
No Correlation
-0.71
1 player
R Hendricks
2 player
C Yusuf
Negative Correlation
0.6
1 player
R Hendricks
2 player
E Jones
Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
R Hendricks
2 player
N Peter
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
R Hendricks
2 player
W Mulder
No Correlation
-0.5
1 player
R Hendricks
2 player
R van der Dussen
Negative Correlation
0.11
1 player
B Fortuin
2 player
D Potgieter
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
B Fortuin
2 player
T Moreki
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.12
1 player
B Fortuin
2 player
T Bavuma
No Correlation
0.17
1 player
B Fortuin
2 player
R Rickelton
No Correlation
0.09
1 player
B Fortuin
2 player
R Hendricks
No Correlation
1
1 player
B Fortuin
2 player
B Fortuin
Strong Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
B Fortuin
2 player
C Yusuf
No Correlation
-0.17
1 player
B Fortuin
2 player
E Jones
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
B Fortuin
2 player
N Peter
No Correlation
-0.08
1 player
B Fortuin
2 player
W Mulder
No Correlation
-0.38
1 player
B Fortuin
2 player
R van der Dussen
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
C Yusuf
2 player
D Potgieter
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
C Yusuf
2 player
T Moreki
Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
C Yusuf
2 player
T Bavuma
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
C Yusuf
2 player
R Rickelton
No Correlation
-0.71
1 player
C Yusuf
2 player
R Hendricks
Negative Correlation
0.08
1 player
C Yusuf
2 player
B Fortuin
No Correlation
1
1 player
C Yusuf
2 player
C Yusuf
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
C Yusuf
2 player
E Jones
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
C Yusuf
2 player
N Peter
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
C Yusuf
2 player
W Mulder
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
C Yusuf
2 player
R van der Dussen
No Correlation
-0.42
1 player
E Jones
2 player
D Potgieter
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
E Jones
2 player
T Moreki
No Correlation
-0.45
1 player
E Jones
2 player
T Bavuma
Negative Correlation
0.45
1 player
E Jones
2 player
R Rickelton
Positive Correlation
0.6
1 player
E Jones
2 player
R Hendricks
Positive Correlation
-0.17
1 player
E Jones
2 player
B Fortuin
No Correlation
0
1 player
E Jones
2 player
C Yusuf
No Correlation
1
1 player
E Jones
2 player
E Jones
Strong Positive Correlation
0.67
1 player
E Jones
2 player
N Peter
Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
E Jones
2 player
W Mulder
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.5
1 player
E Jones
2 player
R van der Dussen
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
N Peter
2 player
D Potgieter
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
N Peter
2 player
T Moreki
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
N Peter
2 player
T Bavuma
Weak Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
N Peter
2 player
R Rickelton
No Correlation
0.43
1 player
N Peter
2 player
R Hendricks
Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
N Peter
2 player
B Fortuin
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
N Peter
2 player
C Yusuf
No Correlation
0.67
1 player
N Peter
2 player
E Jones
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
N Peter
2 player
N Peter
Strong Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
N Peter
2 player
W Mulder
Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
N Peter
2 player
R van der Dussen
No Correlation
-0.2
1 player
W Mulder
2 player
D Potgieter
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
W Mulder
2 player
T Moreki
Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
W Mulder
2 player
T Bavuma
Weak Negative Correlation
0.25
1 player
W Mulder
2 player
R Rickelton
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
W Mulder
2 player
R Hendricks
No Correlation
-0.08
1 player
W Mulder
2 player
B Fortuin
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
W Mulder
2 player
C Yusuf
Weak Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
W Mulder
2 player
E Jones
Weak Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
W Mulder
2 player
N Peter
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
W Mulder
2 player
W Mulder
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
W Mulder
2 player
R van der Dussen
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.11
1 player
R van der Dussen
2 player
D Potgieter
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
R van der Dussen
2 player
T Moreki
Weak Positive Correlation
0.83
1 player
R van der Dussen
2 player
T Bavuma
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
R van der Dussen
2 player
R Rickelton
No Correlation
-0.5
1 player
R van der Dussen
2 player
R Hendricks
Negative Correlation
-0.38
1 player
R van der Dussen
2 player
B Fortuin
Weak Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
R van der Dussen
2 player
C Yusuf
No Correlation
-0.5
1 player
R van der Dussen
2 player
E Jones
Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
R van der Dussen
2 player
N Peter
No Correlation
-0.23
1 player
R van der Dussen
2 player
W Mulder
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
R van der Dussen
2 player
R van der Dussen
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick T Bavuma and R van der Dussen together
Strong Positive Correlation

Pick R Hendricks and E Jones together
Positive Correlation

Pick E Jones and N Peter together
Positive Correlation

Pick D Potgieter and N Peter together
Negative Correlation

Pick T Moreki and C Yusuf together
Negative Correlation

Pick T Moreki and W Mulder together
Negative Correlation

Pick R Hendricks and C Yusuf together
Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 R Hendricks

BAT
Similar Perfomance
E Jones 0.6
N Peter 0.43
T Moreki 0.23
R Rickelton 0.17
B Fortuin 0.09
Opposite Perfomance
C Yusuf -0.71
D Potgieter -0.56
R van der Dussen -0.5
T Bavuma -0.14

2 B Fortuin

BOW
Similar Perfomance
T Moreki 0.35
R Rickelton 0.17
N Peter 0.14
D Potgieter 0.11
R Hendricks 0.09
C Yusuf 0.08
Opposite Perfomance
R van der Dussen -0.38
E Jones -0.17
T Bavuma -0.12
W Mulder -0.08

3 E Jones

AR
Similar Perfomance
N Peter 0.67
R Hendricks 0.6
R Rickelton 0.45
W Mulder 0.38
Opposite Perfomance
R van der Dussen -0.5
T Bavuma -0.45
D Potgieter -0.42
B Fortuin -0.17

4 W Mulder

AR
Similar Perfomance
N Peter 0.43
E Jones 0.38
R Rickelton 0.25
C Yusuf 0.2
Opposite Perfomance
T Moreki -0.7
T Bavuma -0.33
R van der Dussen -0.23
D Potgieter -0.2
B Fortuin -0.08

5 R Rickelton

WK
Similar Perfomance
T Moreki 0.7
E Jones 0.45
W Mulder 0.25
D Potgieter 0.2
R Hendricks 0.17
B Fortuin 0.17
N Peter 0.14
C Yusuf 0.11
Opposite Perfomance
T Bavuma -0.27

PerfectLineup © 2024. All Rights Reserved