TYP-W vs SCO-W

This guide is super useful for identifying player combinations that are likely to score big. Use the filters to identify the best player combinations according to specific match scenarios.

Both players generally perform similarly when picked together. They either score high together or score low together. Maximise FPts by picking players that correlate positively with top players.

Both players generally perform in an opposite manner. If one player scores high, the other usually scores low. Avoid picking players that correlate negatively with top player

TYP-W vs SCO-W

Show Player Combinations on the basis of:

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

A Squires BAT TYP-W

J McNally BOW TYP-W

J Loughran WK TYP-W

L McBride AR TYP-W

R Stokell BAT TYP-W

S Forbes BAT TYP-W

Z Craig AR TYP-W

A Canning AR TYP-W

F Sargent BOW TYP-W

R Searle WK TYP-W

G Dempsey AR TYP-W

A Squires

J McNally

J Loughran

L McBride

R Stokell

S Forbes

Z Craig

A Canning

F Sargent

R Searle

G Dempsey

1

1 player

J Loughran

2 player

J Loughran

Strong Positive Correlation

0.2

1 player

J Loughran

2 player

L McBride

Weak Positive Correlation

0.36

1 player

J Loughran

2 player

R Stokell

Weak Positive Correlation

0.12

1 player

J Loughran

2 player

S Forbes

No Correlation

0.48

1 player

J Loughran

2 player

Z Craig

Positive Correlation

0.59

1 player

J Loughran

2 player

A Canning

Positive Correlation

0.44

1 player

J Loughran

2 player

F Sargent

Positive Correlation

0.37

1 player

J Loughran

2 player

R Searle

Weak Positive Correlation

0.2

1 player

J Loughran

2 player

G Dempsey

Weak Positive Correlation

0.2

1 player

L McBride

2 player

J Loughran

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

L McBride

2 player

L McBride

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.18

1 player

L McBride

2 player

R Stokell

No Correlation

-0.3

1 player

L McBride

2 player

S Forbes

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.13

1 player

L McBride

2 player

Z Craig

No Correlation

0.38

1 player

L McBride

2 player

A Canning

Weak Positive Correlation

0.38

1 player

L McBride

2 player

F Sargent

Weak Positive Correlation

0.33

1 player

L McBride

2 player

R Searle

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.18

1 player

L McBride

2 player

G Dempsey

No Correlation

0.36

1 player

R Stokell

2 player

J Loughran

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.18

1 player

R Stokell

2 player

L McBride

No Correlation

1

1 player

R Stokell

2 player

R Stokell

Strong Positive Correlation

0.56

1 player

R Stokell

2 player

S Forbes

Positive Correlation

0.32

1 player

R Stokell

2 player

Z Craig

Weak Positive Correlation

0.39

1 player

R Stokell

2 player

A Canning

Weak Positive Correlation

0.12

1 player

R Stokell

2 player

F Sargent

No Correlation

0.03

1 player

R Stokell

2 player

R Searle

No Correlation

0.51

1 player

R Stokell

2 player

G Dempsey

Positive Correlation

0.12

1 player

S Forbes

2 player

J Loughran

No Correlation

-0.3

1 player

S Forbes

2 player

L McBride

Weak Negative Correlation

0.56

1 player

S Forbes

2 player

R Stokell

Positive Correlation

1

1 player

S Forbes

2 player

S Forbes

Strong Positive Correlation

0

1 player

S Forbes

2 player

Z Craig

No Correlation

0.13

1 player

S Forbes

2 player

A Canning

No Correlation

0.09

1 player

S Forbes

2 player

F Sargent

No Correlation

0.4

1 player

S Forbes

2 player

R Searle

Positive Correlation

0.42

1 player

S Forbes

2 player

G Dempsey

Positive Correlation

0.48

1 player

Z Craig

2 player

J Loughran

Positive Correlation

-0.13

1 player

Z Craig

2 player

L McBride

No Correlation

0.32

1 player

Z Craig

2 player

R Stokell

Weak Positive Correlation

0

1 player

Z Craig

2 player

S Forbes

No Correlation

1

1 player

Z Craig

2 player

Z Craig

Strong Positive Correlation

0.2

1 player

Z Craig

2 player

A Canning

Weak Positive Correlation

0

1 player

Z Craig

2 player

F Sargent

No Correlation

0.35

1 player

Z Craig

2 player

R Searle

Weak Positive Correlation

0.42

1 player

Z Craig

2 player

G Dempsey

Positive Correlation

0.59

1 player

A Canning

2 player

J Loughran

Positive Correlation

0.38

1 player

A Canning

2 player

L McBride

Weak Positive Correlation

0.39

1 player

A Canning

2 player

R Stokell

Weak Positive Correlation

0.13

1 player

A Canning

2 player

S Forbes

No Correlation

0.2

1 player

A Canning

2 player

Z Craig

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

A Canning

2 player

A Canning

Strong Positive Correlation

0.44

1 player

A Canning

2 player

F Sargent

Positive Correlation

0.3

1 player

A Canning

2 player

R Searle

Weak Positive Correlation

0.29

1 player

A Canning

2 player

G Dempsey

Weak Positive Correlation

0.44

1 player

F Sargent

2 player

J Loughran

Positive Correlation

0.38

1 player

F Sargent

2 player

L McBride

Weak Positive Correlation

0.12

1 player

F Sargent

2 player

R Stokell

No Correlation

0.09

1 player

F Sargent

2 player

S Forbes

No Correlation

0

1 player

F Sargent

2 player

Z Craig

No Correlation

0.44

1 player

F Sargent

2 player

A Canning

Positive Correlation

1

1 player

F Sargent

2 player

F Sargent

Strong Positive Correlation

0.48

1 player

F Sargent

2 player

R Searle

Positive Correlation

0.05

1 player

F Sargent

2 player

G Dempsey

No Correlation

0.37

1 player

R Searle

2 player

J Loughran

Weak Positive Correlation

0.33

1 player

R Searle

2 player

L McBride

Weak Positive Correlation

0.03

1 player

R Searle

2 player

R Stokell

No Correlation

0.4

1 player

R Searle

2 player

S Forbes

Positive Correlation

0.35

1 player

R Searle

2 player

Z Craig

Weak Positive Correlation

0.3

1 player

R Searle

2 player

A Canning

Weak Positive Correlation

0.48

1 player

R Searle

2 player

F Sargent

Positive Correlation

1

1 player

R Searle

2 player

R Searle

Strong Positive Correlation

0.24

1 player

R Searle

2 player

G Dempsey

Weak Positive Correlation

0.2

1 player

G Dempsey

2 player

J Loughran

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.18

1 player

G Dempsey

2 player

L McBride

No Correlation

0.51

1 player

G Dempsey

2 player

R Stokell

Positive Correlation

0.42

1 player

G Dempsey

2 player

S Forbes

Positive Correlation

0.42

1 player

G Dempsey

2 player

Z Craig

Positive Correlation

0.29

1 player

G Dempsey

2 player

A Canning

Weak Positive Correlation

0.05

1 player

G Dempsey

2 player

F Sargent

No Correlation

0.24

1 player

G Dempsey

2 player

R Searle

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

G Dempsey

2 player

G Dempsey

Strong Positive Correlation

Strong Positive Correlation

No Correlation

Strong Negative Correlation

Pick **A Squires** and **J McNally** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **A Squires** and **Z Craig** together

Strong Positive Correlation

Pick **J McNally** and **J Loughran** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **J McNally** and **R Stokell** together

Strong Positive Correlation

Pick **J McNally** and **Z Craig** together

Positive Correlation

Don’t Pick **A Squires** and **F Sargent** together

Negative Correlation

Don’t Pick **J McNally** and **F Sargent** together

Negative Correlation

Similar Perfomance

J Loughran 0.59

F Sargent 0.44

R Stokell 0.39

L McBride 0.38

R Searle 0.3

G Dempsey 0.29

Z Craig 0.2

S Forbes 0.13

Opposite Perfomance

Similar Perfomance

R Stokell 0.51

S Forbes 0.42

Z Craig 0.42

A Canning 0.29

R Searle 0.24

J Loughran 0.2

F Sargent 0.05

Opposite Perfomance

L McBride -0.18

Similar Perfomance

R Searle 0.48

J Loughran 0.44

A Canning 0.44

L McBride 0.38

R Stokell 0.12

S Forbes 0.09

G Dempsey 0.05

Opposite Perfomance

Similar Perfomance

S Forbes 0.56

G Dempsey 0.51

A Canning 0.39

J Loughran 0.36

Z Craig 0.32

F Sargent 0.12

R Searle 0.03

Opposite Perfomance

L McBride -0.18

Similar Perfomance

R Stokell 0.56

G Dempsey 0.42

R Searle 0.4

A Canning 0.13

J Loughran 0.12

F Sargent 0.09

Opposite Perfomance

L McBride -0.3

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

A Tector BOW SCO-W

c Webber BAT SCO-W

N MacNulty BOW SCO-W

S Woods WK SCO-W

A Maguire BOW SCO-W

E McGee BAT SCO-W

G Lewis BAT SCO-W

S Kavanagh WK SCO-W

L Paul AR SCO-W

C Coulter-Reilly WK SCO-W

J Maguire BOW SCO-W

A Tector

c Webber

N MacNulty

S Woods

A Maguire

E McGee

G Lewis

S Kavanagh

L Paul

C Coulter-Reilly

J Maguire

1

1 player

A Tector

2 player

A Tector

Strong Positive Correlation

0.03

1 player

A Tector

2 player

c Webber

No Correlation

-0.47

1 player

A Tector

2 player

S Woods

Negative Correlation

0.51

1 player

A Tector

2 player

A Maguire

Positive Correlation

0.66

1 player

A Tector

2 player

E McGee

Positive Correlation

0.35

1 player

A Tector

2 player

G Lewis

Weak Positive Correlation

0.07

1 player

A Tector

2 player

S Kavanagh

No Correlation

0.18

1 player

A Tector

2 player

L Paul

No Correlation

0.1

1 player

A Tector

2 player

C Coulter-Reilly

No Correlation

0.23

1 player

A Tector

2 player

J Maguire

Weak Positive Correlation

0.03

1 player

c Webber

2 player

A Tector

No Correlation

1

1 player

c Webber

2 player

c Webber

Strong Positive Correlation

0.47

1 player

c Webber

2 player

S Woods

Positive Correlation

0.52

1 player

c Webber

2 player

A Maguire

Positive Correlation

0.1

1 player

c Webber

2 player

E McGee

No Correlation

0.55

1 player

c Webber

2 player

G Lewis

Positive Correlation

0.62

1 player

c Webber

2 player

S Kavanagh

Positive Correlation

0.18

1 player

c Webber

2 player

L Paul

No Correlation

0.5

1 player

c Webber

2 player

C Coulter-Reilly

Positive Correlation

0.62

1 player

c Webber

2 player

J Maguire

Positive Correlation

-0.47

1 player

S Woods

2 player

A Tector

Negative Correlation

0.47

1 player

S Woods

2 player

c Webber

Positive Correlation

1

1 player

S Woods

2 player

S Woods

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.13

1 player

S Woods

2 player

A Maguire

No Correlation

-0.4

1 player

S Woods

2 player

E McGee

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.28

1 player

S Woods

2 player

G Lewis

Weak Negative Correlation

0.47

1 player

S Woods

2 player

S Kavanagh

Positive Correlation

-0.07

1 player

S Woods

2 player

L Paul

No Correlation

0.4

1 player

S Woods

2 player

C Coulter-Reilly

Positive Correlation

0.33

1 player

S Woods

2 player

J Maguire

Weak Positive Correlation

0.51

1 player

A Maguire

2 player

A Tector

Positive Correlation

0.52

1 player

A Maguire

2 player

c Webber

Positive Correlation

-0.13

1 player

A Maguire

2 player

S Woods

No Correlation

1

1 player

A Maguire

2 player

A Maguire

Strong Positive Correlation

0.32

1 player

A Maguire

2 player

E McGee

Weak Positive Correlation

0.48

1 player

A Maguire

2 player

G Lewis

Positive Correlation

0.54

1 player

A Maguire

2 player

S Kavanagh

Positive Correlation

0.3

1 player

A Maguire

2 player

L Paul

Weak Positive Correlation

0.47

1 player

A Maguire

2 player

C Coulter-Reilly

Positive Correlation

0.28

1 player

A Maguire

2 player

J Maguire

Weak Positive Correlation

0.66

1 player

E McGee

2 player

A Tector

Positive Correlation

0.1

1 player

E McGee

2 player

c Webber

No Correlation

-0.4

1 player

E McGee

2 player

S Woods

Weak Negative Correlation

0.32

1 player

E McGee

2 player

A Maguire

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

E McGee

2 player

E McGee

Strong Positive Correlation

0.43

1 player

E McGee

2 player

G Lewis

Positive Correlation

0.38

1 player

E McGee

2 player

S Kavanagh

Weak Positive Correlation

0.12

1 player

E McGee

2 player

L Paul

No Correlation

0.05

1 player

E McGee

2 player

C Coulter-Reilly

No Correlation

0.44

1 player

E McGee

2 player

J Maguire

Positive Correlation

0.35

1 player

G Lewis

2 player

A Tector

Weak Positive Correlation

0.55

1 player

G Lewis

2 player

c Webber

Positive Correlation

-0.28

1 player

G Lewis

2 player

S Woods

Weak Negative Correlation

0.48

1 player

G Lewis

2 player

A Maguire

Positive Correlation

0.43

1 player

G Lewis

2 player

E McGee

Positive Correlation

1

1 player

G Lewis

2 player

G Lewis

Strong Positive Correlation

0.18

1 player

G Lewis

2 player

S Kavanagh

No Correlation

0.34

1 player

G Lewis

2 player

L Paul

Weak Positive Correlation

0.16

1 player

G Lewis

2 player

C Coulter-Reilly

No Correlation

0.31

1 player

G Lewis

2 player

J Maguire

Weak Positive Correlation

0.07

1 player

S Kavanagh

2 player

A Tector

No Correlation

0.62

1 player

S Kavanagh

2 player

c Webber

Positive Correlation

0.47

1 player

S Kavanagh

2 player

S Woods

Positive Correlation

0.54

1 player

S Kavanagh

2 player

A Maguire

Positive Correlation

0.38

1 player

S Kavanagh

2 player

E McGee

Weak Positive Correlation

0.18

1 player

S Kavanagh

2 player

G Lewis

No Correlation

1

1 player

S Kavanagh

2 player

S Kavanagh

Strong Positive Correlation

0.27

1 player

S Kavanagh

2 player

L Paul

Weak Positive Correlation

0.27

1 player

S Kavanagh

2 player

C Coulter-Reilly

Weak Positive Correlation

0.38

1 player

S Kavanagh

2 player

J Maguire

Weak Positive Correlation

0.18

1 player

L Paul

2 player

A Tector

No Correlation

0.18

1 player

L Paul

2 player

c Webber

No Correlation

-0.07

1 player

L Paul

2 player

S Woods

No Correlation

0.3

1 player

L Paul

2 player

A Maguire

Weak Positive Correlation

0.12

1 player

L Paul

2 player

E McGee

No Correlation

0.34

1 player

L Paul

2 player

G Lewis

Weak Positive Correlation

0.27

1 player

L Paul

2 player

S Kavanagh

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

L Paul

2 player

L Paul

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.02

1 player

L Paul

2 player

C Coulter-Reilly

No Correlation

0.2

1 player

L Paul

2 player

J Maguire

Weak Positive Correlation

0.1

1 player

C Coulter-Reilly

2 player

A Tector

No Correlation

0.5

1 player

C Coulter-Reilly

2 player

c Webber

Positive Correlation

0.4

1 player

C Coulter-Reilly

2 player

S Woods

Positive Correlation

0.47

1 player

C Coulter-Reilly

2 player

A Maguire

Positive Correlation

0.05

1 player

C Coulter-Reilly

2 player

E McGee

No Correlation

0.16

1 player

C Coulter-Reilly

2 player

G Lewis

No Correlation

0.27

1 player

C Coulter-Reilly

2 player

S Kavanagh

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.02

1 player

C Coulter-Reilly

2 player

L Paul

No Correlation

1

1 player

C Coulter-Reilly

2 player

C Coulter-Reilly

Strong Positive Correlation

0.3

1 player

C Coulter-Reilly

2 player

J Maguire

Weak Positive Correlation

0.23

1 player

J Maguire

2 player

A Tector

Weak Positive Correlation

0.62

1 player

J Maguire

2 player

c Webber

Positive Correlation

0.33

1 player

J Maguire

2 player

S Woods

Weak Positive Correlation

0.28

1 player

J Maguire

2 player

A Maguire

Weak Positive Correlation

0.44

1 player

J Maguire

2 player

E McGee

Positive Correlation

0.31

1 player

J Maguire

2 player

G Lewis

Weak Positive Correlation

0.38

1 player

J Maguire

2 player

S Kavanagh

Weak Positive Correlation

0.2

1 player

J Maguire

2 player

L Paul

Weak Positive Correlation

0.3

1 player

J Maguire

2 player

C Coulter-Reilly

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

J Maguire

2 player

J Maguire

Strong Positive Correlation

Strong Positive Correlation

No Correlation

Strong Negative Correlation

Pick **A Tector** and **E McGee** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **c Webber** and **S Kavanagh** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **c Webber** and **J Maguire** together

Positive Correlation

Similar Perfomance

G Lewis 0.34

A Maguire 0.3

S Kavanagh 0.27

J Maguire 0.2

A Tector 0.18

c Webber 0.18

E McGee 0.12

Opposite Perfomance

S Woods -0.07

C Coulter-Reilly -0.02

Similar Perfomance

c Webber 0.55

A Maguire 0.48

E McGee 0.43

A Tector 0.35

L Paul 0.34

J Maguire 0.31

S Kavanagh 0.18

C Coulter-Reilly 0.16

Opposite Perfomance

S Woods -0.28

Similar Perfomance

A Tector 0.66

J Maguire 0.44

G Lewis 0.43

S Kavanagh 0.38

A Maguire 0.32

L Paul 0.12

c Webber 0.1

C Coulter-Reilly 0.05

Opposite Perfomance

S Woods -0.4

Similar Perfomance

S Kavanagh 0.54

c Webber 0.52

A Tector 0.51

G Lewis 0.48

C Coulter-Reilly 0.47

E McGee 0.32

L Paul 0.3

J Maguire 0.28

Opposite Perfomance

S Woods -0.13

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

No data found

No data found

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

No data found

No data found

TYP-W vs SCO-W