WB-W 20 Jan 05:10 am AH-W

Lineup Out

Basin Reserve
Women New Zealand T20 Domestic

Best Player Combinations For
WB-W vs AH-W

How it Works?

This guide is super useful for identifying player combinations that are likely to score big. Use the filters to identify the best player combinations according to specific match scenarios.

Player correlate positively

Both players generally perform similarly when picked together. They either score high together or score low together. Maximise FPts by picking players that correlate positively with top players.

Player correlate negatively

Both players generally perform in an opposite manner. If one player scores high, the other usually scores low. Avoid picking players that correlate negatively with top player

Show Player Combinations on the basis of:

Best WB-W Player Combinations

Best WB-W Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad
N Baird AR WB-W
S Mackinder WK WB-W
J McFadyen WK WB-W
R Burns BAT WB-W
C King BAT WB-W
J Kerr BOW WB-W
X Jetly BOW WB-W
N Codyre BOW WB-W
A Kerr AR WB-W
S Devine AR WB-W
N Baird
S Mackinder
J McFadyen
R Burns
C King
J Kerr
X Jetly
N Codyre
A Kerr
S Devine
1
1 player
N Baird
2 player
N Baird
Strong Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
N Baird
2 player
S Mackinder
Weak Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
N Baird
2 player
J McFadyen
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
N Baird
2 player
R Burns
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
N Baird
2 player
C King
Weak Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
N Baird
2 player
J Kerr
No Correlation
0.1
1 player
N Baird
2 player
X Jetly
No Correlation
0.24
1 player
N Baird
2 player
N Codyre
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.02
1 player
N Baird
2 player
A Kerr
No Correlation
0.12
1 player
N Baird
2 player
S Devine
No Correlation
0.38
1 player
S Mackinder
2 player
N Baird
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
S Mackinder
2 player
S Mackinder
Strong Positive Correlation
0.6
1 player
S Mackinder
2 player
J McFadyen
Positive Correlation
-0.15
1 player
S Mackinder
2 player
R Burns
No Correlation
0.52
1 player
S Mackinder
2 player
C King
Positive Correlation
-0.1
1 player
S Mackinder
2 player
J Kerr
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
S Mackinder
2 player
X Jetly
No Correlation
0.58
1 player
S Mackinder
2 player
N Codyre
Positive Correlation
-0.55
1 player
S Mackinder
2 player
A Kerr
Negative Correlation
-0.06
1 player
S Mackinder
2 player
S Devine
No Correlation
0.39
1 player
J McFadyen
2 player
N Baird
Weak Positive Correlation
0.6
1 player
J McFadyen
2 player
S Mackinder
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
J McFadyen
2 player
J McFadyen
Strong Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
J McFadyen
2 player
R Burns
Weak Positive Correlation
0.53
1 player
J McFadyen
2 player
C King
Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
J McFadyen
2 player
J Kerr
Weak Positive Correlation
0.44
1 player
J McFadyen
2 player
X Jetly
Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
J McFadyen
2 player
N Codyre
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.07
1 player
J McFadyen
2 player
A Kerr
No Correlation
0.21
1 player
J McFadyen
2 player
S Devine
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
R Burns
2 player
N Baird
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.15
1 player
R Burns
2 player
S Mackinder
No Correlation
0.32
1 player
R Burns
2 player
J McFadyen
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
R Burns
2 player
R Burns
Strong Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
R Burns
2 player
C King
Weak Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
R Burns
2 player
J Kerr
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
R Burns
2 player
X Jetly
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
R Burns
2 player
N Codyre
Weak Positive Correlation
0.19
1 player
R Burns
2 player
A Kerr
No Correlation
0.53
1 player
R Burns
2 player
S Devine
Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
C King
2 player
N Baird
Weak Positive Correlation
0.52
1 player
C King
2 player
S Mackinder
Positive Correlation
0.53
1 player
C King
2 player
J McFadyen
Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
C King
2 player
R Burns
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
C King
2 player
C King
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.03
1 player
C King
2 player
J Kerr
No Correlation
0.13
1 player
C King
2 player
X Jetly
No Correlation
0.58
1 player
C King
2 player
N Codyre
Positive Correlation
-0.29
1 player
C King
2 player
A Kerr
Weak Negative Correlation
0.08
1 player
C King
2 player
S Devine
No Correlation
0.17
1 player
J Kerr
2 player
N Baird
No Correlation
-0.1
1 player
J Kerr
2 player
S Mackinder
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
J Kerr
2 player
J McFadyen
Weak Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
J Kerr
2 player
R Burns
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.03
1 player
J Kerr
2 player
C King
No Correlation
1
1 player
J Kerr
2 player
J Kerr
Strong Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
J Kerr
2 player
X Jetly
No Correlation
-0.28
1 player
J Kerr
2 player
N Codyre
Weak Negative Correlation
0.39
1 player
J Kerr
2 player
A Kerr
Weak Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
J Kerr
2 player
S Devine
Weak Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
X Jetly
2 player
N Baird
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
X Jetly
2 player
S Mackinder
No Correlation
0.44
1 player
X Jetly
2 player
J McFadyen
Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
X Jetly
2 player
R Burns
Weak Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
X Jetly
2 player
C King
No Correlation
0.13
1 player
X Jetly
2 player
J Kerr
No Correlation
1
1 player
X Jetly
2 player
X Jetly
Strong Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
X Jetly
2 player
N Codyre
No Correlation
0.12
1 player
X Jetly
2 player
A Kerr
No Correlation
0.02
1 player
X Jetly
2 player
S Devine
No Correlation
0.24
1 player
N Codyre
2 player
N Baird
Weak Positive Correlation
0.58
1 player
N Codyre
2 player
S Mackinder
Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
N Codyre
2 player
J McFadyen
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
N Codyre
2 player
R Burns
Weak Positive Correlation
0.58
1 player
N Codyre
2 player
C King
Positive Correlation
-0.28
1 player
N Codyre
2 player
J Kerr
Weak Negative Correlation
0.18
1 player
N Codyre
2 player
X Jetly
No Correlation
1
1 player
N Codyre
2 player
N Codyre
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.5
1 player
N Codyre
2 player
A Kerr
Negative Correlation
0.01
1 player
N Codyre
2 player
S Devine
No Correlation
-0.02
1 player
A Kerr
2 player
N Baird
No Correlation
-0.55
1 player
A Kerr
2 player
S Mackinder
Negative Correlation
-0.07
1 player
A Kerr
2 player
J McFadyen
No Correlation
0.19
1 player
A Kerr
2 player
R Burns
No Correlation
-0.29
1 player
A Kerr
2 player
C King
Weak Negative Correlation
0.39
1 player
A Kerr
2 player
J Kerr
Weak Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
A Kerr
2 player
X Jetly
No Correlation
-0.5
1 player
A Kerr
2 player
N Codyre
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
A Kerr
2 player
A Kerr
Strong Positive Correlation
0.69
1 player
A Kerr
2 player
S Devine
Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
S Devine
2 player
N Baird
No Correlation
-0.06
1 player
S Devine
2 player
S Mackinder
No Correlation
0.21
1 player
S Devine
2 player
J McFadyen
Weak Positive Correlation
0.53
1 player
S Devine
2 player
R Burns
Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
S Devine
2 player
C King
No Correlation
0.39
1 player
S Devine
2 player
J Kerr
Weak Positive Correlation
0.02
1 player
S Devine
2 player
X Jetly
No Correlation
0.01
1 player
S Devine
2 player
N Codyre
No Correlation
0.69
1 player
S Devine
2 player
A Kerr
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
S Devine
2 player
S Devine
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick S Mackinder and J McFadyen together
Positive Correlation

Pick A Kerr and S Devine together
Positive Correlation

High Performing Players

1 A Kerr

AR
Similar Perfomance
S Devine 0.69
J Kerr 0.39
R Burns 0.19
X Jetly 0.12
Opposite Perfomance
S Mackinder -0.55
N Codyre -0.5
C King -0.29
J McFadyen -0.07
N Baird -0.02

2 J Kerr

BOW
Similar Perfomance
A Kerr 0.39
S Devine 0.39
J McFadyen 0.25
R Burns 0.21
N Baird 0.17
X Jetly 0.13
Opposite Perfomance
N Codyre -0.28
S Mackinder -0.1
C King -0.03

3 R Burns

BAT
Similar Perfomance
S Devine 0.53
J McFadyen 0.32
C King 0.27
N Baird 0.23
X Jetly 0.23
N Codyre 0.23
J Kerr 0.21
A Kerr 0.19
Opposite Perfomance
S Mackinder -0.15

4 X Jetly

BOW
Similar Perfomance
J McFadyen 0.44
R Burns 0.23
N Codyre 0.18
C King 0.13
J Kerr 0.13
A Kerr 0.12
S Mackinder 0.11
N Baird 0.1
S Devine 0.02

5 N Baird

AR
Similar Perfomance
J McFadyen 0.39
S Mackinder 0.38
C King 0.33
N Codyre 0.24
R Burns 0.23
J Kerr 0.17
S Devine 0.12
X Jetly 0.1
Opposite Perfomance
A Kerr -0.02

Best AH-W Player Combinations

Best AH-W Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad
I Gaze WK AH-W
B Illing BOW AH-W
L Down BAT AH-W
S Shahri BAT AH-W
B Armstrong BAT AH-W
F Jonas BOW AH-W
A Hucker BOW AH-W
M Penfold BOW AH-W
M Green WK AH-W
J Penfold AR AH-W
P Catton AR AH-W
I Gaze
B Illing
L Down
S Shahri
B Armstrong
F Jonas
A Hucker
M Penfold
M Green
J Penfold
P Catton
1
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
I Gaze
Strong Positive Correlation
0.29
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
B Illing
Weak Positive Correlation
0.49
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
L Down
Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
S Shahri
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
B Armstrong
Weak Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
F Jonas
No Correlation
0.27
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
A Hucker
Weak Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
M Penfold
Weak Positive Correlation
0.04
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
M Green
No Correlation
0.31
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
J Penfold
Weak Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
P Catton
Weak Positive Correlation
0.29
1 player
B Illing
2 player
I Gaze
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
B Illing
2 player
B Illing
Strong Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
B Illing
2 player
L Down
Weak Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
B Illing
2 player
S Shahri
No Correlation
0.3
1 player
B Illing
2 player
B Armstrong
Weak Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
B Illing
2 player
F Jonas
Weak Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
B Illing
2 player
A Hucker
Weak Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
B Illing
2 player
M Penfold
Weak Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
B Illing
2 player
M Green
Weak Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
B Illing
2 player
J Penfold
No Correlation
0.27
1 player
B Illing
2 player
P Catton
Weak Positive Correlation
0.49
1 player
L Down
2 player
I Gaze
Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
L Down
2 player
B Illing
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
L Down
2 player
L Down
Strong Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
L Down
2 player
S Shahri
Weak Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
L Down
2 player
B Armstrong
Weak Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
L Down
2 player
F Jonas
No Correlation
0.15
1 player
L Down
2 player
A Hucker
No Correlation
0.27
1 player
L Down
2 player
M Penfold
Weak Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
L Down
2 player
M Green
Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
L Down
2 player
J Penfold
Weak Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
L Down
2 player
P Catton
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
I Gaze
Weak Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
B Illing
No Correlation
0.21
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
L Down
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
S Shahri
Strong Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
B Armstrong
Positive Correlation
0.03
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
F Jonas
No Correlation
0.12
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
A Hucker
No Correlation
0.29
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
M Penfold
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.01
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
M Green
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
J Penfold
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
P Catton
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
I Gaze
Weak Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
B Illing
Weak Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
L Down
Weak Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
S Shahri
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
B Armstrong
Strong Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
F Jonas
Weak Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
A Hucker
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
M Penfold
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.15
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
M Green
No Correlation
0.04
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
J Penfold
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
P Catton
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
I Gaze
No Correlation
0.22
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
B Illing
Weak Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
L Down
No Correlation
0.03
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
S Shahri
No Correlation
0.21
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
B Armstrong
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
F Jonas
Strong Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
A Hucker
Weak Positive Correlation
0.16
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
M Penfold
No Correlation
0.16
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
M Green
No Correlation
-0.02
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
J Penfold
No Correlation
0.19
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
P Catton
No Correlation
0.27
1 player
A Hucker
2 player
I Gaze
Weak Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
A Hucker
2 player
B Illing
Weak Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
A Hucker
2 player
L Down
No Correlation
0.12
1 player
A Hucker
2 player
S Shahri
No Correlation
0.39
1 player
A Hucker
2 player
B Armstrong
Weak Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
A Hucker
2 player
F Jonas
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
A Hucker
2 player
A Hucker
Strong Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
A Hucker
2 player
M Penfold
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.03
1 player
A Hucker
2 player
M Green
No Correlation
-0.03
1 player
A Hucker
2 player
J Penfold
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
A Hucker
2 player
P Catton
Weak Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
M Penfold
2 player
I Gaze
Weak Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
M Penfold
2 player
B Illing
Weak Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
M Penfold
2 player
L Down
Weak Positive Correlation
0.29
1 player
M Penfold
2 player
S Shahri
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
M Penfold
2 player
B Armstrong
Weak Positive Correlation
0.16
1 player
M Penfold
2 player
F Jonas
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
M Penfold
2 player
A Hucker
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M Penfold
2 player
M Penfold
Strong Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
M Penfold
2 player
M Green
Weak Positive Correlation
0.51
1 player
M Penfold
2 player
J Penfold
Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
M Penfold
2 player
P Catton
Positive Correlation
0.04
1 player
M Green
2 player
I Gaze
No Correlation
0.22
1 player
M Green
2 player
B Illing
Weak Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
M Green
2 player
L Down
Positive Correlation
-0.01
1 player
M Green
2 player
S Shahri
No Correlation
-0.15
1 player
M Green
2 player
B Armstrong
No Correlation
0.16
1 player
M Green
2 player
F Jonas
No Correlation
-0.03
1 player
M Green
2 player
A Hucker
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
M Green
2 player
M Penfold
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M Green
2 player
M Green
Strong Positive Correlation
0.04
1 player
M Green
2 player
J Penfold
No Correlation
0.19
1 player
M Green
2 player
P Catton
No Correlation
0.31
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
I Gaze
Weak Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
B Illing
No Correlation
0.39
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
L Down
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
S Shahri
Weak Positive Correlation
0.04
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
B Armstrong
No Correlation
-0.02
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
F Jonas
No Correlation
-0.03
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
A Hucker
No Correlation
0.51
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
M Penfold
Positive Correlation
0.04
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
M Green
No Correlation
1
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
J Penfold
Strong Positive Correlation
0.54
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
P Catton
Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
P Catton
2 player
I Gaze
Weak Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
P Catton
2 player
B Illing
Weak Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
P Catton
2 player
L Down
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
P Catton
2 player
S Shahri
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
P Catton
2 player
B Armstrong
No Correlation
0.19
1 player
P Catton
2 player
F Jonas
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
P Catton
2 player
A Hucker
Weak Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
P Catton
2 player
M Penfold
Positive Correlation
0.19
1 player
P Catton
2 player
M Green
No Correlation
0.54
1 player
P Catton
2 player
J Penfold
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
P Catton
2 player
P Catton
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

No data found

High Performing Players

1 F Jonas

BOW
Similar Perfomance
A Hucker 0.3
B Illing 0.22
B Armstrong 0.21
P Catton 0.19
M Penfold 0.16
M Green 0.16
L Down 0.13
I Gaze 0.08
S Shahri 0.03
Opposite Perfomance
J Penfold -0.02

2 M Green

WK
Similar Perfomance
L Down 0.4
M Penfold 0.35
B Illing 0.22
P Catton 0.19
F Jonas 0.16
I Gaze 0.04
J Penfold 0.04
Opposite Perfomance
B Armstrong -0.15
A Hucker -0.03
S Shahri -0.01

3 M Penfold

BOW
Similar Perfomance
J Penfold 0.51
P Catton 0.42
M Green 0.35
I Gaze 0.34
B Armstrong 0.33
B Illing 0.31
S Shahri 0.29
L Down 0.27
A Hucker 0.23
F Jonas 0.16

4 A Hucker

BOW
Similar Perfomance
B Illing 0.39
B Armstrong 0.39
P Catton 0.35
F Jonas 0.3
I Gaze 0.27
M Penfold 0.23
L Down 0.15
S Shahri 0.12
Opposite Perfomance
M Green -0.03
J Penfold -0.03

5 S Shahri

BAT
Similar Perfomance
B Armstrong 0.42
I Gaze 0.33
J Penfold 0.33
M Penfold 0.29
L Down 0.21
A Hucker 0.12
B Illing 0.1
F Jonas 0.03
Opposite Perfomance
M Green -0.01

Best WB-W Player Combinations

Best WB-W Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

No data found

No data found

High Performing Players

Best AH-W Player Combinations

Best AH-W Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad
I Gaze WK AH-W
B Illing BOW AH-W
L Down BAT AH-W
S Shahri BAT AH-W
B Armstrong BAT AH-W
F Jonas BOW AH-W
A Hucker BOW AH-W
M Penfold BOW AH-W
M Green WK AH-W
J Penfold AR AH-W
P Catton AR AH-W
I Gaze
B Illing
L Down
S Shahri
B Armstrong
F Jonas
A Hucker
M Penfold
M Green
J Penfold
P Catton
1
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
I Gaze
Strong Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
B Illing
No Correlation
0.38
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
L Down
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
S Shahri
No Correlation
0.12
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
B Armstrong
No Correlation
-0.1
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
F Jonas
No Correlation
-0.07
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
A Hucker
No Correlation
0
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
M Penfold
No Correlation
-0.41
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
M Green
Negative Correlation
0.07
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
J Penfold
No Correlation
0.26
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
P Catton
Weak Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
B Illing
2 player
I Gaze
No Correlation
1
1 player
B Illing
2 player
B Illing
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
B Illing
2 player
L Down
No Correlation
-0.11
1 player
B Illing
2 player
S Shahri
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
B Illing
2 player
B Armstrong
No Correlation
0.18
1 player
B Illing
2 player
F Jonas
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
B Illing
2 player
A Hucker
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.06
1 player
B Illing
2 player
M Penfold
No Correlation
0.18
1 player
B Illing
2 player
M Green
No Correlation
-0.57
1 player
B Illing
2 player
J Penfold
Negative Correlation
-0.22
1 player
B Illing
2 player
P Catton
Weak Negative Correlation
0.38
1 player
L Down
2 player
I Gaze
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
L Down
2 player
B Illing
No Correlation
1
1 player
L Down
2 player
L Down
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
L Down
2 player
S Shahri
No Correlation
0.1
1 player
L Down
2 player
B Armstrong
No Correlation
-0.07
1 player
L Down
2 player
F Jonas
No Correlation
-0.22
1 player
L Down
2 player
A Hucker
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.2
1 player
L Down
2 player
M Penfold
No Correlation
0.09
1 player
L Down
2 player
M Green
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
L Down
2 player
J Penfold
Positive Correlation
-0.07
1 player
L Down
2 player
P Catton
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
I Gaze
No Correlation
-0.11
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
B Illing
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
L Down
No Correlation
1
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
S Shahri
Strong Positive Correlation
0.04
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
B Armstrong
No Correlation
-0.27
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
F Jonas
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.17
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
A Hucker
No Correlation
0.04
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
M Penfold
No Correlation
-0.22
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
M Green
Weak Negative Correlation
0.5
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
J Penfold
Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
P Catton
Weak Negative Correlation
0.12
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
I Gaze
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
B Illing
No Correlation
0.1
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
L Down
No Correlation
0.04
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
S Shahri
No Correlation
1
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
B Armstrong
Strong Positive Correlation
0.06
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
F Jonas
No Correlation
0
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
A Hucker
No Correlation
0.09
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
M Penfold
No Correlation
-0.54
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
M Green
Negative Correlation
-0.5
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
J Penfold
Negative Correlation
-0.26
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
P Catton
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.1
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
I Gaze
No Correlation
0.18
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
B Illing
No Correlation
-0.07
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
L Down
No Correlation
-0.27
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
S Shahri
Weak Negative Correlation
0.06
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
B Armstrong
No Correlation
1
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
F Jonas
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
A Hucker
No Correlation
-0.36
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
M Penfold
Weak Negative Correlation
0.06
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
M Green
No Correlation
-0.29
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
J Penfold
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.11
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
P Catton
No Correlation
-0.07
1 player
A Hucker
2 player
I Gaze
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
A Hucker
2 player
B Illing
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.22
1 player
A Hucker
2 player
L Down
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.17
1 player
A Hucker
2 player
S Shahri
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Hucker
2 player
B Armstrong
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Hucker
2 player
F Jonas
No Correlation
1
1 player
A Hucker
2 player
A Hucker
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
A Hucker
2 player
M Penfold
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
A Hucker
2 player
M Green
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.6
1 player
A Hucker
2 player
J Penfold
Negative Correlation
0.11
1 player
A Hucker
2 player
P Catton
No Correlation
0
1 player
M Penfold
2 player
I Gaze
No Correlation
-0.06
1 player
M Penfold
2 player
B Illing
No Correlation
-0.2
1 player
M Penfold
2 player
L Down
No Correlation
0.04
1 player
M Penfold
2 player
S Shahri
No Correlation
0.09
1 player
M Penfold
2 player
B Armstrong
No Correlation
-0.36
1 player
M Penfold
2 player
F Jonas
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
M Penfold
2 player
A Hucker
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
M Penfold
2 player
M Penfold
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
M Penfold
2 player
M Green
No Correlation
0.29
1 player
M Penfold
2 player
J Penfold
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
M Penfold
2 player
P Catton
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.41
1 player
M Green
2 player
I Gaze
Negative Correlation
0.18
1 player
M Green
2 player
B Illing
No Correlation
0.09
1 player
M Green
2 player
L Down
No Correlation
-0.22
1 player
M Green
2 player
S Shahri
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.54
1 player
M Green
2 player
B Armstrong
Negative Correlation
0.06
1 player
M Green
2 player
F Jonas
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
M Green
2 player
A Hucker
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
M Green
2 player
M Penfold
No Correlation
1
1 player
M Green
2 player
M Green
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.08
1 player
M Green
2 player
J Penfold
No Correlation
-0.11
1 player
M Green
2 player
P Catton
No Correlation
0.07
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
I Gaze
No Correlation
-0.57
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
B Illing
Negative Correlation
0.5
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
L Down
Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
S Shahri
Positive Correlation
-0.5
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
B Armstrong
Negative Correlation
-0.29
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
F Jonas
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.6
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
A Hucker
Negative Correlation
0.29
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
M Penfold
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.08
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
M Green
No Correlation
1
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
J Penfold
Strong Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
P Catton
Weak Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
P Catton
2 player
I Gaze
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.22
1 player
P Catton
2 player
B Illing
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.07
1 player
P Catton
2 player
L Down
No Correlation
-0.25
1 player
P Catton
2 player
S Shahri
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.26
1 player
P Catton
2 player
B Armstrong
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.11
1 player
P Catton
2 player
F Jonas
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
P Catton
2 player
A Hucker
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
P Catton
2 player
M Penfold
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.11
1 player
P Catton
2 player
M Green
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
P Catton
2 player
J Penfold
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
P Catton
2 player
P Catton
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

No data found

Pick A Hucker and J Penfold together
Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 M Green

WK
Similar Perfomance
B Illing 0.18
L Down 0.09
F Jonas 0.06
Opposite Perfomance
B Armstrong -0.54
I Gaze -0.41
A Hucker -0.33
S Shahri -0.22
P Catton -0.11
J Penfold -0.08

2 F Jonas

BOW
Similar Perfomance
B Illing 0.18
B Armstrong 0.06
M Green 0.06
Opposite Perfomance
M Penfold -0.36
J Penfold -0.29
S Shahri -0.27
P Catton -0.11
I Gaze -0.1
L Down -0.07

3 M Penfold

BOW
Similar Perfomance
P Catton 0.33
J Penfold 0.29
B Armstrong 0.09
S Shahri 0.04
Opposite Perfomance
F Jonas -0.36
A Hucker -0.33
L Down -0.2
B Illing -0.06

4 S Shahri

BAT
Similar Perfomance
J Penfold 0.5
B Armstrong 0.04
M Penfold 0.04
Opposite Perfomance
F Jonas -0.27
P Catton -0.25
M Green -0.22
A Hucker -0.17
I Gaze -0.14
L Down -0.14
B Illing -0.11

5 A Hucker

BOW
Similar Perfomance
B Illing 0.33
P Catton 0.11
Opposite Perfomance
J Penfold -0.6
M Penfold -0.33
M Green -0.33
L Down -0.22
S Shahri -0.17
I Gaze -0.07

PerfectLineup © 2025. All Rights Reserved