WOR 21 Jun 10:00 pm WAS

Lineup Out

County Ground, New Road
English T20 Blast

Best Player Combinations For
WOR vs WAS

How it Works?

This guide is super useful for identifying player combinations that are likely to score big. Use the filters to identify the best player combinations according to specific match scenarios.

Player correlate positively

Both players generally perform similarly when picked together. They either score high together or score low together. Maximise FPts by picking players that correlate positively with top players.

Player correlate negatively

Both players generally perform in an opposite manner. If one player scores high, the other usually scores low. Avoid picking players that correlate negatively with top player

Show Player Combinations on the basis of:

Best WOR Player Combinations

Best WOR Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad
K-Ali ll AR WOR
H Walsh BOW WOR
N Smith BOW WOR
R Jones BAT WOR
G Roderick WK WOR
J Cobb AR WOR
T Taylor AR WOR
A Finch BOW WOR
A Hose BAT WOR
E Pollock BAT WOR
E Brookes AR WOR
K-Ali ll
H Walsh
N Smith
R Jones
G Roderick
J Cobb
T Taylor
A Finch
A Hose
E Pollock
E Brookes
1
1 player
K-Ali ll
2 player
K-Ali ll
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.02
1 player
K-Ali ll
2 player
H Walsh
No Correlation
0.15
1 player
K-Ali ll
2 player
N Smith
No Correlation
0.36
1 player
K-Ali ll
2 player
R Jones
Weak Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
K-Ali ll
2 player
G Roderick
No Correlation
0.36
1 player
K-Ali ll
2 player
J Cobb
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
K-Ali ll
2 player
T Taylor
No Correlation
0.12
1 player
K-Ali ll
2 player
A Finch
No Correlation
0.15
1 player
K-Ali ll
2 player
A Hose
No Correlation
0.27
1 player
K-Ali ll
2 player
E Pollock
Weak Positive Correlation
0.64
1 player
K-Ali ll
2 player
E Brookes
Positive Correlation
-0.02
1 player
H Walsh
2 player
K-Ali ll
No Correlation
1
1 player
H Walsh
2 player
H Walsh
Strong Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
H Walsh
2 player
N Smith
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
H Walsh
2 player
R Jones
No Correlation
0.26
1 player
H Walsh
2 player
G Roderick
Weak Positive Correlation
0.02
1 player
H Walsh
2 player
J Cobb
No Correlation
0.12
1 player
H Walsh
2 player
T Taylor
No Correlation
0.21
1 player
H Walsh
2 player
A Finch
Weak Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
H Walsh
2 player
A Hose
Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
H Walsh
2 player
E Pollock
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
H Walsh
2 player
E Brookes
No Correlation
0.15
1 player
N Smith
2 player
K-Ali ll
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
N Smith
2 player
H Walsh
No Correlation
1
1 player
N Smith
2 player
N Smith
Strong Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
N Smith
2 player
R Jones
No Correlation
-0.17
1 player
N Smith
2 player
G Roderick
No Correlation
0.1
1 player
N Smith
2 player
J Cobb
No Correlation
0.54
1 player
N Smith
2 player
T Taylor
Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
N Smith
2 player
A Finch
Weak Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
N Smith
2 player
A Hose
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
N Smith
2 player
E Pollock
Weak Positive Correlation
0.19
1 player
N Smith
2 player
E Brookes
No Correlation
0.36
1 player
R Jones
2 player
K-Ali ll
Weak Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
R Jones
2 player
H Walsh
No Correlation
0.12
1 player
R Jones
2 player
N Smith
No Correlation
1
1 player
R Jones
2 player
R Jones
Strong Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
R Jones
2 player
G Roderick
Positive Correlation
0.62
1 player
R Jones
2 player
J Cobb
Positive Correlation
-0.28
1 player
R Jones
2 player
T Taylor
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.1
1 player
R Jones
2 player
A Finch
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
R Jones
2 player
A Hose
Weak Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
R Jones
2 player
E Pollock
Weak Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
R Jones
2 player
E Brookes
Weak Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
G Roderick
2 player
K-Ali ll
No Correlation
0.26
1 player
G Roderick
2 player
H Walsh
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.17
1 player
G Roderick
2 player
N Smith
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
G Roderick
2 player
R Jones
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
G Roderick
2 player
G Roderick
Strong Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
G Roderick
2 player
J Cobb
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.02
1 player
G Roderick
2 player
T Taylor
No Correlation
0.12
1 player
G Roderick
2 player
A Finch
No Correlation
0.38
1 player
G Roderick
2 player
A Hose
Weak Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
G Roderick
2 player
E Pollock
Weak Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
G Roderick
2 player
E Brookes
No Correlation
0.36
1 player
J Cobb
2 player
K-Ali ll
Weak Positive Correlation
0.02
1 player
J Cobb
2 player
H Walsh
No Correlation
0.1
1 player
J Cobb
2 player
N Smith
No Correlation
0.62
1 player
J Cobb
2 player
R Jones
Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
J Cobb
2 player
G Roderick
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
J Cobb
2 player
J Cobb
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.1
1 player
J Cobb
2 player
T Taylor
No Correlation
0.62
1 player
J Cobb
2 player
A Finch
Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
J Cobb
2 player
A Hose
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
J Cobb
2 player
E Pollock
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
J Cobb
2 player
E Brookes
Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
T Taylor
2 player
K-Ali ll
No Correlation
0.12
1 player
T Taylor
2 player
H Walsh
No Correlation
0.54
1 player
T Taylor
2 player
N Smith
Positive Correlation
-0.28
1 player
T Taylor
2 player
R Jones
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.02
1 player
T Taylor
2 player
G Roderick
No Correlation
-0.1
1 player
T Taylor
2 player
J Cobb
No Correlation
1
1 player
T Taylor
2 player
T Taylor
Strong Positive Correlation
0.05
1 player
T Taylor
2 player
A Finch
No Correlation
0.21
1 player
T Taylor
2 player
A Hose
Weak Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
T Taylor
2 player
E Pollock
No Correlation
0.13
1 player
T Taylor
2 player
E Brookes
No Correlation
0.12
1 player
A Finch
2 player
K-Ali ll
No Correlation
0.21
1 player
A Finch
2 player
H Walsh
Weak Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
A Finch
2 player
N Smith
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.1
1 player
A Finch
2 player
R Jones
No Correlation
0.12
1 player
A Finch
2 player
G Roderick
No Correlation
0.62
1 player
A Finch
2 player
J Cobb
Positive Correlation
0.05
1 player
A Finch
2 player
T Taylor
No Correlation
1
1 player
A Finch
2 player
A Finch
Strong Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
A Finch
2 player
A Hose
No Correlation
0.21
1 player
A Finch
2 player
E Pollock
Weak Positive Correlation
0.62
1 player
A Finch
2 player
E Brookes
Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
A Hose
2 player
K-Ali ll
No Correlation
0.43
1 player
A Hose
2 player
H Walsh
Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
A Hose
2 player
N Smith
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
A Hose
2 player
R Jones
Weak Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
A Hose
2 player
G Roderick
Weak Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
A Hose
2 player
J Cobb
No Correlation
0.21
1 player
A Hose
2 player
T Taylor
Weak Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
A Hose
2 player
A Finch
No Correlation
1
1 player
A Hose
2 player
A Hose
Strong Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
A Hose
2 player
E Pollock
No Correlation
0.18
1 player
A Hose
2 player
E Brookes
No Correlation
0.27
1 player
E Pollock
2 player
K-Ali ll
Weak Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
E Pollock
2 player
H Walsh
Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
E Pollock
2 player
N Smith
Weak Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
E Pollock
2 player
R Jones
Weak Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
E Pollock
2 player
G Roderick
Weak Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
E Pollock
2 player
J Cobb
No Correlation
0.15
1 player
E Pollock
2 player
T Taylor
No Correlation
0.21
1 player
E Pollock
2 player
A Finch
Weak Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
E Pollock
2 player
A Hose
No Correlation
1
1 player
E Pollock
2 player
E Pollock
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.05
1 player
E Pollock
2 player
E Brookes
No Correlation
0.64
1 player
E Brookes
2 player
K-Ali ll
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
E Brookes
2 player
H Walsh
No Correlation
0.19
1 player
E Brookes
2 player
N Smith
No Correlation
0.34
1 player
E Brookes
2 player
R Jones
Weak Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
E Brookes
2 player
G Roderick
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
E Brookes
2 player
J Cobb
Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
E Brookes
2 player
T Taylor
No Correlation
0.62
1 player
E Brookes
2 player
A Finch
Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
E Brookes
2 player
A Hose
No Correlation
-0.05
1 player
E Brookes
2 player
E Pollock
No Correlation
1
1 player
E Brookes
2 player
E Brookes
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick K-Ali ll and E Brookes together
Positive Correlation

Pick R Jones and J Cobb together
Positive Correlation

Pick J Cobb and A Finch together
Positive Correlation

Pick J Cobb and E Brookes together
Positive Correlation

Pick A Finch and E Brookes together
Positive Correlation

High Performing Players

1 A Hose

BAT
Similar Perfomance
H Walsh 0.43
G Roderick 0.38
N Smith 0.32
R Jones 0.28
T Taylor 0.21
J Cobb 0.18
E Brookes 0.18
K-Ali ll 0.15
E Pollock 0.15
A Finch 0.12

2 T Taylor

AR
Similar Perfomance
N Smith 0.54
A Hose 0.21
E Pollock 0.15
K-Ali ll 0.14
E Brookes 0.13
H Walsh 0.12
A Finch 0.05
Opposite Perfomance
R Jones -0.28
J Cobb -0.1
G Roderick -0.02

3 E Brookes

AR
Similar Perfomance
J Cobb 0.7
K-Ali ll 0.64
A Finch 0.62
R Jones 0.34
N Smith 0.19
G Roderick 0.18
A Hose 0.18
T Taylor 0.13
Opposite Perfomance
E Pollock -0.05

4 K-Ali ll

AR
Similar Perfomance
E Brookes 0.64
R Jones 0.36
J Cobb 0.36
E Pollock 0.27
N Smith 0.15
A Hose 0.15
T Taylor 0.14
A Finch 0.12
G Roderick 0.1
Opposite Perfomance
H Walsh -0.02

5 A Finch

BOW
Similar Perfomance
E Brookes 0.62
J Cobb 0.62
H Walsh 0.21
N Smith 0.21
E Pollock 0.21
K-Ali ll 0.12
G Roderick 0.12
A Hose 0.12
T Taylor 0.05
Opposite Perfomance
R Jones -0.1

Best WAS Player Combinations

Best WAS Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad
M Booth BOW WAS
G Garton BOW WAS
A Davies WK WAS
D Mousley AR WAS
S Hain BAT WAS
E Barnard AR WAS
D Briggs BOW WAS
C Miles BOW WAS
J Lintott BOW WAS
J Bethell BAT WAS
C Benjamin WK WAS
M Booth
G Garton
A Davies
D Mousley
S Hain
E Barnard
D Briggs
C Miles
J Lintott
J Bethell
C Benjamin
1
1 player
M Booth
2 player
M Booth
Strong Positive Correlation
0.55
1 player
M Booth
2 player
G Garton
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
M Booth
2 player
A Davies
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
M Booth
2 player
D Mousley
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
M Booth
2 player
S Hain
No Correlation
0.13
1 player
M Booth
2 player
E Barnard
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
M Booth
2 player
D Briggs
Weak Positive Correlation
0.6
1 player
M Booth
2 player
C Miles
Positive Correlation
0.6
1 player
M Booth
2 player
J Lintott
Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
M Booth
2 player
J Bethell
Weak Positive Correlation
0.57
1 player
M Booth
2 player
C Benjamin
Positive Correlation
0.55
1 player
G Garton
2 player
M Booth
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
G Garton
2 player
G Garton
Strong Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
G Garton
2 player
A Davies
Weak Positive Correlation
0.06
1 player
G Garton
2 player
D Mousley
No Correlation
0.12
1 player
G Garton
2 player
S Hain
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
G Garton
2 player
E Barnard
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.19
1 player
G Garton
2 player
D Briggs
No Correlation
0.44
1 player
G Garton
2 player
C Miles
Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
G Garton
2 player
J Lintott
Weak Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
G Garton
2 player
J Bethell
Weak Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
G Garton
2 player
C Benjamin
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
A Davies
2 player
M Booth
No Correlation
0.39
1 player
A Davies
2 player
G Garton
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
A Davies
2 player
A Davies
Strong Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
A Davies
2 player
D Mousley
Weak Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
A Davies
2 player
S Hain
No Correlation
0.12
1 player
A Davies
2 player
E Barnard
No Correlation
0.26
1 player
A Davies
2 player
D Briggs
Weak Positive Correlation
0.01
1 player
A Davies
2 player
C Miles
No Correlation
0.15
1 player
A Davies
2 player
J Lintott
No Correlation
0.39
1 player
A Davies
2 player
J Bethell
Weak Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
A Davies
2 player
C Benjamin
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
D Mousley
2 player
M Booth
Positive Correlation
0.06
1 player
D Mousley
2 player
G Garton
No Correlation
0.21
1 player
D Mousley
2 player
A Davies
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
D Mousley
2 player
D Mousley
Strong Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
D Mousley
2 player
S Hain
No Correlation
-0.03
1 player
D Mousley
2 player
E Barnard
No Correlation
0.26
1 player
D Mousley
2 player
D Briggs
Weak Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
D Mousley
2 player
C Miles
No Correlation
0.13
1 player
D Mousley
2 player
J Lintott
No Correlation
0.06
1 player
D Mousley
2 player
J Bethell
No Correlation
-0.13
1 player
D Mousley
2 player
C Benjamin
No Correlation
0
1 player
S Hain
2 player
M Booth
No Correlation
0.12
1 player
S Hain
2 player
G Garton
No Correlation
0.15
1 player
S Hain
2 player
A Davies
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
S Hain
2 player
D Mousley
No Correlation
1
1 player
S Hain
2 player
S Hain
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.11
1 player
S Hain
2 player
E Barnard
No Correlation
0.31
1 player
S Hain
2 player
D Briggs
Weak Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
S Hain
2 player
C Miles
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
S Hain
2 player
J Lintott
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
S Hain
2 player
J Bethell
Weak Positive Correlation
0.06
1 player
S Hain
2 player
C Benjamin
No Correlation
0.13
1 player
E Barnard
2 player
M Booth
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
E Barnard
2 player
G Garton
Weak Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
E Barnard
2 player
A Davies
No Correlation
-0.03
1 player
E Barnard
2 player
D Mousley
No Correlation
-0.11
1 player
E Barnard
2 player
S Hain
No Correlation
1
1 player
E Barnard
2 player
E Barnard
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.17
1 player
E Barnard
2 player
D Briggs
No Correlation
0.17
1 player
E Barnard
2 player
C Miles
No Correlation
0.21
1 player
E Barnard
2 player
J Lintott
Weak Positive Correlation
0.45
1 player
E Barnard
2 player
J Bethell
Positive Correlation
0.41
1 player
E Barnard
2 player
C Benjamin
Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
D Briggs
2 player
M Booth
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.19
1 player
D Briggs
2 player
G Garton
No Correlation
0.26
1 player
D Briggs
2 player
A Davies
Weak Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
D Briggs
2 player
D Mousley
Weak Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
D Briggs
2 player
S Hain
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.17
1 player
D Briggs
2 player
E Barnard
No Correlation
1
1 player
D Briggs
2 player
D Briggs
Strong Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
D Briggs
2 player
C Miles
Weak Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
D Briggs
2 player
J Lintott
Weak Positive Correlation
0.06
1 player
D Briggs
2 player
J Bethell
No Correlation
-0.1
1 player
D Briggs
2 player
C Benjamin
No Correlation
0.6
1 player
C Miles
2 player
M Booth
Positive Correlation
0.44
1 player
C Miles
2 player
G Garton
Positive Correlation
0.01
1 player
C Miles
2 player
A Davies
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
C Miles
2 player
D Mousley
No Correlation
0.17
1 player
C Miles
2 player
S Hain
No Correlation
0.17
1 player
C Miles
2 player
E Barnard
No Correlation
0.27
1 player
C Miles
2 player
D Briggs
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
C Miles
2 player
C Miles
Strong Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
C Miles
2 player
J Lintott
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
C Miles
2 player
J Bethell
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
C Miles
2 player
C Benjamin
Weak Positive Correlation
0.6
1 player
J Lintott
2 player
M Booth
Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
J Lintott
2 player
G Garton
Weak Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
J Lintott
2 player
A Davies
No Correlation
0.13
1 player
J Lintott
2 player
D Mousley
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
J Lintott
2 player
S Hain
No Correlation
0.21
1 player
J Lintott
2 player
E Barnard
Weak Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
J Lintott
2 player
D Briggs
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
J Lintott
2 player
C Miles
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
J Lintott
2 player
J Lintott
Strong Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
J Lintott
2 player
J Bethell
Weak Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
J Lintott
2 player
C Benjamin
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
J Bethell
2 player
M Booth
Weak Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
J Bethell
2 player
G Garton
Weak Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
J Bethell
2 player
A Davies
Weak Positive Correlation
0.06
1 player
J Bethell
2 player
D Mousley
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
J Bethell
2 player
S Hain
Weak Positive Correlation
0.45
1 player
J Bethell
2 player
E Barnard
Positive Correlation
0.06
1 player
J Bethell
2 player
D Briggs
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
J Bethell
2 player
C Miles
No Correlation
0.34
1 player
J Bethell
2 player
J Lintott
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
J Bethell
2 player
J Bethell
Strong Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
J Bethell
2 player
C Benjamin
Weak Positive Correlation
0.57
1 player
C Benjamin
2 player
M Booth
Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
C Benjamin
2 player
G Garton
Weak Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
C Benjamin
2 player
A Davies
No Correlation
-0.13
1 player
C Benjamin
2 player
D Mousley
No Correlation
0.06
1 player
C Benjamin
2 player
S Hain
No Correlation
0.41
1 player
C Benjamin
2 player
E Barnard
Positive Correlation
-0.1
1 player
C Benjamin
2 player
D Briggs
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
C Benjamin
2 player
C Miles
Weak Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
C Benjamin
2 player
J Lintott
Weak Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
C Benjamin
2 player
J Bethell
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
C Benjamin
2 player
C Benjamin
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick M Booth and C Miles together
Positive Correlation

Pick M Booth and J Lintott together
Positive Correlation

High Performing Players

1 D Mousley

AR
Similar Perfomance
M Booth 0.4
D Briggs 0.26
A Davies 0.21
J Lintott 0.13
S Hain 0.11
C Miles 0.08
G Garton 0.06
J Bethell 0.06
Opposite Perfomance
C Benjamin -0.13
E Barnard -0.03

2 D Briggs

BOW
Similar Perfomance
S Hain 0.31
C Miles 0.27
J Lintott 0.27
A Davies 0.26
D Mousley 0.26
M Booth 0.2
J Bethell 0.06
Opposite Perfomance
G Garton -0.19
E Barnard -0.17
C Benjamin -0.1

3 S Hain

BAT
Similar Perfomance
D Briggs 0.31
J Bethell 0.23
C Miles 0.17
A Davies 0.15
G Garton 0.12
D Mousley 0.11
J Lintott 0.08
C Benjamin 0.06
Opposite Perfomance
E Barnard -0.11

4 A Davies

WK
Similar Perfomance
G Garton 0.39
J Bethell 0.39
D Briggs 0.26
D Mousley 0.21
S Hain 0.15
J Lintott 0.15
E Barnard 0.12
C Benjamin 0.12
C Miles 0.01

5 J Lintott

BOW
Similar Perfomance
M Booth 0.6
J Bethell 0.34
G Garton 0.33
C Miles 0.33
D Briggs 0.27
C Benjamin 0.24
E Barnard 0.21
A Davies 0.15
D Mousley 0.13
S Hain 0.08

Best WOR Player Combinations

Best WOR Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad
K-Ali ll AR WOR
H Walsh BOW WOR
N Smith BOW WOR
R Jones BAT WOR
G Roderick WK WOR
J Cobb AR WOR
T Taylor AR WOR
A Finch BOW WOR
A Hose BAT WOR
E Pollock BAT WOR
E Brookes AR WOR
K-Ali ll
H Walsh
N Smith
R Jones
G Roderick
J Cobb
T Taylor
A Finch
A Hose
E Pollock
E Brookes
1
1 player
K-Ali ll
2 player
K-Ali ll
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.42
1 player
K-Ali ll
2 player
H Walsh
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
K-Ali ll
2 player
N Smith
No Correlation
-0.42
1 player
K-Ali ll
2 player
R Jones
Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
K-Ali ll
2 player
G Roderick
Weak Negative Correlation
0.43
1 player
K-Ali ll
2 player
J Cobb
Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
K-Ali ll
2 player
T Taylor
No Correlation
-0.64
1 player
K-Ali ll
2 player
A Finch
Negative Correlation
-0.3
1 player
K-Ali ll
2 player
A Hose
Weak Negative Correlation
0.05
1 player
K-Ali ll
2 player
E Pollock
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
K-Ali ll
2 player
E Brookes
Positive Correlation
-0.42
1 player
H Walsh
2 player
K-Ali ll
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
H Walsh
2 player
H Walsh
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
H Walsh
2 player
N Smith
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.42
1 player
H Walsh
2 player
R Jones
Negative Correlation
0.08
1 player
H Walsh
2 player
G Roderick
No Correlation
-0.27
1 player
H Walsh
2 player
J Cobb
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.08
1 player
H Walsh
2 player
T Taylor
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
H Walsh
2 player
A Finch
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
H Walsh
2 player
A Hose
Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
H Walsh
2 player
E Pollock
No Correlation
-0.38
1 player
H Walsh
2 player
E Brookes
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
N Smith
2 player
K-Ali ll
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
N Smith
2 player
H Walsh
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
N Smith
2 player
N Smith
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
N Smith
2 player
R Jones
No Correlation
-0.56
1 player
N Smith
2 player
G Roderick
Negative Correlation
-0.43
1 player
N Smith
2 player
J Cobb
Negative Correlation
0.56
1 player
N Smith
2 player
T Taylor
Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
N Smith
2 player
A Finch
Weak Negative Correlation
0.11
1 player
N Smith
2 player
A Hose
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
N Smith
2 player
E Pollock
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
N Smith
2 player
E Brookes
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.42
1 player
R Jones
2 player
K-Ali ll
Negative Correlation
-0.42
1 player
R Jones
2 player
H Walsh
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
R Jones
2 player
N Smith
No Correlation
1
1 player
R Jones
2 player
R Jones
Strong Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
R Jones
2 player
G Roderick
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
R Jones
2 player
J Cobb
No Correlation
-0.42
1 player
R Jones
2 player
T Taylor
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
R Jones
2 player
A Finch
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
R Jones
2 player
A Hose
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
R Jones
2 player
E Pollock
Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
R Jones
2 player
E Brookes
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
G Roderick
2 player
K-Ali ll
Weak Negative Correlation
0.08
1 player
G Roderick
2 player
H Walsh
No Correlation
-0.56
1 player
G Roderick
2 player
N Smith
Negative Correlation
0.42
1 player
G Roderick
2 player
R Jones
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
G Roderick
2 player
G Roderick
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.09
1 player
G Roderick
2 player
J Cobb
No Correlation
-0.38
1 player
G Roderick
2 player
T Taylor
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.11
1 player
G Roderick
2 player
A Finch
No Correlation
0.17
1 player
G Roderick
2 player
A Hose
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
G Roderick
2 player
E Pollock
No Correlation
-0.08
1 player
G Roderick
2 player
E Brookes
No Correlation
0.43
1 player
J Cobb
2 player
K-Ali ll
Positive Correlation
-0.27
1 player
J Cobb
2 player
H Walsh
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.43
1 player
J Cobb
2 player
N Smith
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
J Cobb
2 player
R Jones
No Correlation
-0.09
1 player
J Cobb
2 player
G Roderick
No Correlation
1
1 player
J Cobb
2 player
J Cobb
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.69
1 player
J Cobb
2 player
T Taylor
Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
J Cobb
2 player
A Finch
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.5
1 player
J Cobb
2 player
A Hose
Negative Correlation
-0.54
1 player
J Cobb
2 player
E Pollock
Negative Correlation
0.82
1 player
J Cobb
2 player
E Brookes
Strong Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
T Taylor
2 player
K-Ali ll
No Correlation
-0.08
1 player
T Taylor
2 player
H Walsh
No Correlation
0.56
1 player
T Taylor
2 player
N Smith
Positive Correlation
-0.42
1 player
T Taylor
2 player
R Jones
Negative Correlation
-0.38
1 player
T Taylor
2 player
G Roderick
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.69
1 player
T Taylor
2 player
J Cobb
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
T Taylor
2 player
T Taylor
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.27
1 player
T Taylor
2 player
A Finch
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
T Taylor
2 player
A Hose
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
T Taylor
2 player
E Pollock
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
T Taylor
2 player
E Brookes
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.64
1 player
A Finch
2 player
K-Ali ll
Negative Correlation
0.11
1 player
A Finch
2 player
H Walsh
No Correlation
-0.25
1 player
A Finch
2 player
N Smith
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
A Finch
2 player
R Jones
Negative Correlation
-0.11
1 player
A Finch
2 player
G Roderick
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
A Finch
2 player
J Cobb
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.27
1 player
A Finch
2 player
T Taylor
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
A Finch
2 player
A Finch
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.11
1 player
A Finch
2 player
A Hose
No Correlation
-0.44
1 player
A Finch
2 player
E Pollock
Negative Correlation
0.56
1 player
A Finch
2 player
E Brookes
Positive Correlation
-0.3
1 player
A Hose
2 player
K-Ali ll
Weak Negative Correlation
0.5
1 player
A Hose
2 player
H Walsh
Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
A Hose
2 player
N Smith
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Hose
2 player
R Jones
No Correlation
0.17
1 player
A Hose
2 player
G Roderick
No Correlation
-0.5
1 player
A Hose
2 player
J Cobb
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
A Hose
2 player
T Taylor
No Correlation
-0.11
1 player
A Hose
2 player
A Finch
No Correlation
1
1 player
A Hose
2 player
A Hose
Strong Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
A Hose
2 player
E Pollock
No Correlation
-0.5
1 player
A Hose
2 player
E Brookes
Negative Correlation
0.05
1 player
E Pollock
2 player
K-Ali ll
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
E Pollock
2 player
H Walsh
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
E Pollock
2 player
N Smith
Weak Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
E Pollock
2 player
R Jones
Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
E Pollock
2 player
G Roderick
No Correlation
-0.54
1 player
E Pollock
2 player
J Cobb
Negative Correlation
0.2
1 player
E Pollock
2 player
T Taylor
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.44
1 player
E Pollock
2 player
A Finch
Negative Correlation
0.11
1 player
E Pollock
2 player
A Hose
No Correlation
1
1 player
E Pollock
2 player
E Pollock
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.69
1 player
E Pollock
2 player
E Brookes
Negative Correlation
0.42
1 player
E Brookes
2 player
K-Ali ll
Positive Correlation
-0.38
1 player
E Brookes
2 player
H Walsh
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
E Brookes
2 player
N Smith
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
E Brookes
2 player
R Jones
No Correlation
-0.08
1 player
E Brookes
2 player
G Roderick
No Correlation
0.82
1 player
E Brookes
2 player
J Cobb
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
E Brookes
2 player
T Taylor
Weak Negative Correlation
0.56
1 player
E Brookes
2 player
A Finch
Positive Correlation
-0.5
1 player
E Brookes
2 player
A Hose
Negative Correlation
-0.69
1 player
E Brookes
2 player
E Pollock
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
E Brookes
2 player
E Brookes
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

No data found

Pick K-Ali ll and A Finch together
Negative Correlation

Pick R Jones and A Finch together
Negative Correlation

Pick J Cobb and T Taylor together
Negative Correlation

Pick E Pollock and E Brookes together
Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 A Hose

BAT
Similar Perfomance
H Walsh 0.5
G Roderick 0.17
N Smith 0.11
E Pollock 0.11
Opposite Perfomance
J Cobb -0.5
E Brookes -0.5
K-Ali ll -0.3
A Finch -0.11

2 T Taylor

AR
Similar Perfomance
N Smith 0.56
E Pollock 0.2
K-Ali ll 0.14
Opposite Perfomance
J Cobb -0.69
R Jones -0.42
G Roderick -0.38
A Finch -0.27
E Brookes -0.23
H Walsh -0.08

3 A Finch

BOW
Similar Perfomance
E Brookes 0.56
J Cobb 0.33
H Walsh 0.11
Opposite Perfomance
R Jones -0.7
K-Ali ll -0.64
E Pollock -0.44
T Taylor -0.27
N Smith -0.25
G Roderick -0.11
A Hose -0.11

4 E Brookes

AR
Similar Perfomance
J Cobb 0.82
A Finch 0.56
K-Ali ll 0.42
Opposite Perfomance
E Pollock -0.69
A Hose -0.5
H Walsh -0.38
N Smith -0.33
T Taylor -0.23
R Jones -0.14
G Roderick -0.08

5 K-Ali ll

AR
Similar Perfomance
J Cobb 0.43
E Brookes 0.42
T Taylor 0.14
E Pollock 0.05
Opposite Perfomance
A Finch -0.64
H Walsh -0.42
R Jones -0.42
G Roderick -0.33
A Hose -0.3

Best WAS Player Combinations

Best WAS Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad
M Booth BOW WAS
G Garton BOW WAS
A Davies WK WAS
D Mousley AR WAS
S Hain BAT WAS
E Barnard AR WAS
D Briggs BOW WAS
C Miles BOW WAS
J Lintott BOW WAS
J Bethell BAT WAS
C Benjamin WK WAS
M Booth
G Garton
A Davies
D Mousley
S Hain
E Barnard
D Briggs
C Miles
J Lintott
J Bethell
C Benjamin
1
1 player
M Booth
2 player
M Booth
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
M Booth
2 player
G Garton
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Booth
2 player
A Davies
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
M Booth
2 player
D Mousley
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
M Booth
2 player
S Hain
Negative Correlation
0.23
1 player
M Booth
2 player
E Barnard
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
M Booth
2 player
D Briggs
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
M Booth
2 player
C Miles
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
M Booth
2 player
J Lintott
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
M Booth
2 player
J Bethell
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
M Booth
2 player
C Benjamin
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
G Garton
2 player
M Booth
No Correlation
1
1 player
G Garton
2 player
G Garton
Strong Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
G Garton
2 player
A Davies
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
G Garton
2 player
D Mousley
No Correlation
0
1 player
G Garton
2 player
S Hain
No Correlation
0.67
1 player
G Garton
2 player
E Barnard
Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
G Garton
2 player
D Briggs
Weak Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
G Garton
2 player
C Miles
No Correlation
0.09
1 player
G Garton
2 player
J Lintott
No Correlation
0.27
1 player
G Garton
2 player
J Bethell
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
G Garton
2 player
C Benjamin
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
A Davies
2 player
M Booth
Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
A Davies
2 player
G Garton
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
A Davies
2 player
A Davies
Strong Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
A Davies
2 player
D Mousley
No Correlation
-0.24
1 player
A Davies
2 player
S Hain
Weak Negative Correlation
0.2
1 player
A Davies
2 player
E Barnard
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
A Davies
2 player
D Briggs
No Correlation
-0.5
1 player
A Davies
2 player
C Miles
Negative Correlation
-0.28
1 player
A Davies
2 player
J Lintott
Weak Negative Correlation
0.2
1 player
A Davies
2 player
J Bethell
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.36
1 player
A Davies
2 player
C Benjamin
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
D Mousley
2 player
M Booth
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
D Mousley
2 player
G Garton
No Correlation
0.15
1 player
D Mousley
2 player
A Davies
No Correlation
1
1 player
D Mousley
2 player
D Mousley
Strong Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
D Mousley
2 player
S Hain
No Correlation
0
1 player
D Mousley
2 player
E Barnard
No Correlation
0.17
1 player
D Mousley
2 player
D Briggs
No Correlation
0.09
1 player
D Mousley
2 player
C Miles
No Correlation
0
1 player
D Mousley
2 player
J Lintott
No Correlation
-0.26
1 player
D Mousley
2 player
J Bethell
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.19
1 player
D Mousley
2 player
C Benjamin
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
S Hain
2 player
M Booth
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
S Hain
2 player
G Garton
No Correlation
-0.24
1 player
S Hain
2 player
A Davies
Weak Negative Correlation
0.18
1 player
S Hain
2 player
D Mousley
No Correlation
1
1 player
S Hain
2 player
S Hain
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.56
1 player
S Hain
2 player
E Barnard
Negative Correlation
0.3
1 player
S Hain
2 player
D Briggs
Weak Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
S Hain
2 player
C Miles
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.26
1 player
S Hain
2 player
J Lintott
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.29
1 player
S Hain
2 player
J Bethell
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
S Hain
2 player
C Benjamin
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
E Barnard
2 player
M Booth
Weak Positive Correlation
0.67
1 player
E Barnard
2 player
G Garton
Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
E Barnard
2 player
A Davies
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
E Barnard
2 player
D Mousley
No Correlation
-0.56
1 player
E Barnard
2 player
S Hain
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
E Barnard
2 player
E Barnard
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.6
1 player
E Barnard
2 player
D Briggs
Negative Correlation
0.11
1 player
E Barnard
2 player
C Miles
No Correlation
-0.2
1 player
E Barnard
2 player
J Lintott
No Correlation
0.27
1 player
E Barnard
2 player
J Bethell
Weak Positive Correlation
0.41
1 player
E Barnard
2 player
C Benjamin
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
D Briggs
2 player
M Booth
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
D Briggs
2 player
G Garton
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
D Briggs
2 player
A Davies
No Correlation
0.17
1 player
D Briggs
2 player
D Mousley
No Correlation
0.3
1 player
D Briggs
2 player
S Hain
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.6
1 player
D Briggs
2 player
E Barnard
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
D Briggs
2 player
D Briggs
Strong Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
D Briggs
2 player
C Miles
No Correlation
0.13
1 player
D Briggs
2 player
J Lintott
No Correlation
-0.18
1 player
D Briggs
2 player
J Bethell
No Correlation
-0.23
1 player
D Briggs
2 player
C Benjamin
Weak Negative Correlation
0.23
1 player
C Miles
2 player
M Booth
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
C Miles
2 player
G Garton
No Correlation
-0.5
1 player
C Miles
2 player
A Davies
Negative Correlation
0.09
1 player
C Miles
2 player
D Mousley
No Correlation
0.27
1 player
C Miles
2 player
S Hain
Weak Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
C Miles
2 player
E Barnard
No Correlation
0.17
1 player
C Miles
2 player
D Briggs
No Correlation
1
1 player
C Miles
2 player
C Miles
Strong Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
C Miles
2 player
J Lintott
Weak Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
C Miles
2 player
J Bethell
Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
C Miles
2 player
C Benjamin
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
J Lintott
2 player
M Booth
Weak Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
J Lintott
2 player
G Garton
No Correlation
-0.28
1 player
J Lintott
2 player
A Davies
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
J Lintott
2 player
D Mousley
No Correlation
-0.26
1 player
J Lintott
2 player
S Hain
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.2
1 player
J Lintott
2 player
E Barnard
No Correlation
0.13
1 player
J Lintott
2 player
D Briggs
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
J Lintott
2 player
C Miles
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
J Lintott
2 player
J Lintott
Strong Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
J Lintott
2 player
J Bethell
Positive Correlation
-0.11
1 player
J Lintott
2 player
C Benjamin
No Correlation
0
1 player
J Bethell
2 player
M Booth
No Correlation
0.27
1 player
J Bethell
2 player
G Garton
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
J Bethell
2 player
A Davies
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.26
1 player
J Bethell
2 player
D Mousley
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.29
1 player
J Bethell
2 player
S Hain
Weak Negative Correlation
0.27
1 player
J Bethell
2 player
E Barnard
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.18
1 player
J Bethell
2 player
D Briggs
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
J Bethell
2 player
C Miles
Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
J Bethell
2 player
J Lintott
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
J Bethell
2 player
J Bethell
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
J Bethell
2 player
C Benjamin
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
C Benjamin
2 player
M Booth
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
C Benjamin
2 player
G Garton
No Correlation
-0.36
1 player
C Benjamin
2 player
A Davies
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.19
1 player
C Benjamin
2 player
D Mousley
No Correlation
0
1 player
C Benjamin
2 player
S Hain
No Correlation
0.41
1 player
C Benjamin
2 player
E Barnard
Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
C Benjamin
2 player
D Briggs
Weak Negative Correlation
0.08
1 player
C Benjamin
2 player
C Miles
No Correlation
-0.11
1 player
C Benjamin
2 player
J Lintott
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
C Benjamin
2 player
J Bethell
No Correlation
1
1 player
C Benjamin
2 player
C Benjamin
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick M Booth and A Davies together
Positive Correlation

Pick G Garton and E Barnard together
Positive Correlation

Pick M Booth and D Mousley together
Negative Correlation

Pick M Booth and S Hain together
Negative Correlation

Pick E Barnard and D Briggs together
Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 D Mousley

AR
Similar Perfomance
S Hain 0.18
D Briggs 0.17
A Davies 0.15
C Miles 0.09
Opposite Perfomance
M Booth -0.7
J Bethell -0.26
C Benjamin -0.19

2 A Davies

WK
Similar Perfomance
M Booth 0.7
G Garton 0.2
E Barnard 0.2
J Bethell 0.2
D Mousley 0.15
Opposite Perfomance
C Miles -0.5
C Benjamin -0.36
J Lintott -0.28
S Hain -0.24

3 D Briggs

BOW
Similar Perfomance
S Hain 0.3
D Mousley 0.17
C Miles 0.17
J Lintott 0.13
Opposite Perfomance
E Barnard -0.6
G Garton -0.33
C Benjamin -0.23
J Bethell -0.18

4 J Lintott

BOW
Similar Perfomance
J Bethell 0.4
M Booth 0.23
C Miles 0.2
D Briggs 0.13
G Garton 0.09
Opposite Perfomance
A Davies -0.28
S Hain -0.26
E Barnard -0.2
C Benjamin -0.11

5 S Hain

BAT
Similar Perfomance
D Briggs 0.3
C Miles 0.27
D Mousley 0.18
Opposite Perfomance
M Booth -0.7
E Barnard -0.56
J Bethell -0.29
J Lintott -0.26
A Davies -0.24

PerfectLineup © 2024. All Rights Reserved