WOR vs WAS

This guide is super useful for identifying player combinations that are likely to score big. Use the filters to identify the best player combinations according to specific match scenarios.

Both players generally perform similarly when picked together. They either score high together or score low together. Maximise FPts by picking players that correlate positively with top players.

Both players generally perform in an opposite manner. If one player scores high, the other usually scores low. Avoid picking players that correlate negatively with top player

Show Player Combinations on the basis of:

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

K-Ali ll AR WOR

H Walsh BOW WOR

N Smith BOW WOR

R Jones BAT WOR

G Roderick WK WOR

J Cobb AR WOR

T Taylor AR WOR

A Finch BOW WOR

A Hose BAT WOR

E Pollock BAT WOR

E Brookes AR WOR

K-Ali ll

H Walsh

N Smith

R Jones

G Roderick

J Cobb

T Taylor

A Finch

A Hose

E Pollock

E Brookes

1

1 player

H Walsh

2 player

H Walsh

Strong Positive Correlation

0.08

1 player

H Walsh

2 player

N Smith

No Correlation

0.08

1 player

H Walsh

2 player

R Jones

No Correlation

0.26

1 player

H Walsh

2 player

G Roderick

Weak Positive Correlation

0.12

1 player

H Walsh

2 player

T Taylor

No Correlation

0.21

1 player

H Walsh

2 player

A Finch

Weak Positive Correlation

0.43

1 player

H Walsh

2 player

A Hose

Positive Correlation

0.5

1 player

H Walsh

2 player

E Pollock

Positive Correlation

0

1 player

H Walsh

2 player

E Brookes

No Correlation

0.08

1 player

N Smith

2 player

H Walsh

No Correlation

1

1 player

N Smith

2 player

N Smith

Strong Positive Correlation

0.12

1 player

N Smith

2 player

R Jones

No Correlation

-0.17

1 player

N Smith

2 player

G Roderick

No Correlation

0.54

1 player

N Smith

2 player

T Taylor

Positive Correlation

0.21

1 player

N Smith

2 player

A Finch

Weak Positive Correlation

0.32

1 player

N Smith

2 player

A Hose

Weak Positive Correlation

0.23

1 player

N Smith

2 player

E Pollock

Weak Positive Correlation

0.19

1 player

N Smith

2 player

E Brookes

No Correlation

0.08

1 player

R Jones

2 player

H Walsh

No Correlation

0.12

1 player

R Jones

2 player

N Smith

No Correlation

1

1 player

R Jones

2 player

R Jones

Strong Positive Correlation

0.42

1 player

R Jones

2 player

G Roderick

Positive Correlation

-0.28

1 player

R Jones

2 player

T Taylor

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.1

1 player

R Jones

2 player

A Finch

No Correlation

0.28

1 player

R Jones

2 player

A Hose

Weak Positive Correlation

0.36

1 player

R Jones

2 player

E Pollock

Weak Positive Correlation

0.34

1 player

R Jones

2 player

E Brookes

Weak Positive Correlation

0.26

1 player

G Roderick

2 player

H Walsh

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.17

1 player

G Roderick

2 player

N Smith

No Correlation

0.42

1 player

G Roderick

2 player

R Jones

Positive Correlation

1

1 player

G Roderick

2 player

G Roderick

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.02

1 player

G Roderick

2 player

T Taylor

No Correlation

0.12

1 player

G Roderick

2 player

A Finch

No Correlation

0.38

1 player

G Roderick

2 player

A Hose

Weak Positive Correlation

0.36

1 player

G Roderick

2 player

E Pollock

Weak Positive Correlation

0.18

1 player

G Roderick

2 player

E Brookes

No Correlation

0.12

1 player

T Taylor

2 player

H Walsh

No Correlation

0.54

1 player

T Taylor

2 player

N Smith

Positive Correlation

-0.28

1 player

T Taylor

2 player

R Jones

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.02

1 player

T Taylor

2 player

G Roderick

No Correlation

1

1 player

T Taylor

2 player

T Taylor

Strong Positive Correlation

0.05

1 player

T Taylor

2 player

A Finch

No Correlation

0.21

1 player

T Taylor

2 player

A Hose

Weak Positive Correlation

0.15

1 player

T Taylor

2 player

E Pollock

No Correlation

0.13

1 player

T Taylor

2 player

E Brookes

No Correlation

0.21

1 player

A Finch

2 player

H Walsh

Weak Positive Correlation

0.21

1 player

A Finch

2 player

N Smith

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.1

1 player

A Finch

2 player

R Jones

No Correlation

0.12

1 player

A Finch

2 player

G Roderick

No Correlation

0.05

1 player

A Finch

2 player

T Taylor

No Correlation

1

1 player

A Finch

2 player

A Finch

Strong Positive Correlation

0.12

1 player

A Finch

2 player

A Hose

No Correlation

0.21

1 player

A Finch

2 player

E Pollock

Weak Positive Correlation

0.62

1 player

A Finch

2 player

E Brookes

Positive Correlation

0.43

1 player

A Hose

2 player

H Walsh

Positive Correlation

0.32

1 player

A Hose

2 player

N Smith

Weak Positive Correlation

0.28

1 player

A Hose

2 player

R Jones

Weak Positive Correlation

0.38

1 player

A Hose

2 player

G Roderick

Weak Positive Correlation

0.21

1 player

A Hose

2 player

T Taylor

Weak Positive Correlation

0.12

1 player

A Hose

2 player

A Finch

No Correlation

1

1 player

A Hose

2 player

A Hose

Strong Positive Correlation

0.15

1 player

A Hose

2 player

E Pollock

No Correlation

0.18

1 player

A Hose

2 player

E Brookes

No Correlation

0.5

1 player

E Pollock

2 player

H Walsh

Positive Correlation

0.23

1 player

E Pollock

2 player

N Smith

Weak Positive Correlation

0.36

1 player

E Pollock

2 player

R Jones

Weak Positive Correlation

0.36

1 player

E Pollock

2 player

G Roderick

Weak Positive Correlation

0.15

1 player

E Pollock

2 player

T Taylor

No Correlation

0.21

1 player

E Pollock

2 player

A Finch

Weak Positive Correlation

0.15

1 player

E Pollock

2 player

A Hose

No Correlation

1

1 player

E Pollock

2 player

E Pollock

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.05

1 player

E Pollock

2 player

E Brookes

No Correlation

0

1 player

E Brookes

2 player

H Walsh

No Correlation

0.19

1 player

E Brookes

2 player

N Smith

No Correlation

0.34

1 player

E Brookes

2 player

R Jones

Weak Positive Correlation

0.18

1 player

E Brookes

2 player

G Roderick

No Correlation

0.13

1 player

E Brookes

2 player

T Taylor

No Correlation

0.62

1 player

E Brookes

2 player

A Finch

Positive Correlation

0.18

1 player

E Brookes

2 player

A Hose

No Correlation

-0.05

1 player

E Brookes

2 player

E Pollock

No Correlation

1

1 player

E Brookes

2 player

E Brookes

Strong Positive Correlation

Strong Positive Correlation

No Correlation

Strong Negative Correlation

Pick **K-Ali ll** and **E Brookes** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **R Jones** and **J Cobb** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **J Cobb** and **A Finch** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **J Cobb** and **E Brookes** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **A Finch** and **E Brookes** together

Positive Correlation

Similar Perfomance

H Walsh 0.43

G Roderick 0.38

N Smith 0.32

R Jones 0.28

T Taylor 0.21

E Brookes 0.18

E Pollock 0.15

A Finch 0.12

Similar Perfomance

N Smith 0.54

A Hose 0.21

E Pollock 0.15

E Brookes 0.13

H Walsh 0.12

A Finch 0.05

Opposite Perfomance

R Jones -0.28

G Roderick -0.02

Similar Perfomance

A Finch 0.62

R Jones 0.34

N Smith 0.19

G Roderick 0.18

A Hose 0.18

T Taylor 0.13

Opposite Perfomance

E Pollock -0.05

Similar Perfomance

E Brookes 0.62

H Walsh 0.21

N Smith 0.21

E Pollock 0.21

G Roderick 0.12

A Hose 0.12

T Taylor 0.05

Opposite Perfomance

R Jones -0.1

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

M Booth BOW WAS

G Garton BOW WAS

A Davies WK WAS

D Mousley AR WAS

S Hain BAT WAS

E Barnard AR WAS

D Briggs BOW WAS

C Miles BOW WAS

J Lintott BOW WAS

J Bethell BAT WAS

C Benjamin WK WAS

M Booth

G Garton

A Davies

D Mousley

S Hain

E Barnard

D Briggs

C Miles

J Lintott

J Bethell

C Benjamin

1

1 player

G Garton

2 player

G Garton

Strong Positive Correlation

0.39

1 player

G Garton

2 player

A Davies

Weak Positive Correlation

0.06

1 player

G Garton

2 player

D Mousley

No Correlation

0.12

1 player

G Garton

2 player

S Hain

No Correlation

0.25

1 player

G Garton

2 player

E Barnard

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.19

1 player

G Garton

2 player

D Briggs

No Correlation

0.44

1 player

G Garton

2 player

C Miles

Positive Correlation

0.33

1 player

G Garton

2 player

J Lintott

Weak Positive Correlation

0.39

1 player

G Garton

2 player

J Bethell

Weak Positive Correlation

0.24

1 player

G Garton

2 player

C Benjamin

Weak Positive Correlation

0.39

1 player

A Davies

2 player

G Garton

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

A Davies

2 player

A Davies

Strong Positive Correlation

0.21

1 player

A Davies

2 player

D Mousley

Weak Positive Correlation

0.15

1 player

A Davies

2 player

S Hain

No Correlation

0.12

1 player

A Davies

2 player

E Barnard

No Correlation

0.26

1 player

A Davies

2 player

D Briggs

Weak Positive Correlation

0.01

1 player

A Davies

2 player

C Miles

No Correlation

0.15

1 player

A Davies

2 player

J Lintott

No Correlation

0.39

1 player

A Davies

2 player

J Bethell

Weak Positive Correlation

0.12

1 player

A Davies

2 player

C Benjamin

No Correlation

0.06

1 player

D Mousley

2 player

G Garton

No Correlation

0.21

1 player

D Mousley

2 player

A Davies

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

D Mousley

2 player

D Mousley

Strong Positive Correlation

0.11

1 player

D Mousley

2 player

S Hain

No Correlation

-0.03

1 player

D Mousley

2 player

E Barnard

No Correlation

0.26

1 player

D Mousley

2 player

D Briggs

Weak Positive Correlation

0.08

1 player

D Mousley

2 player

C Miles

No Correlation

0.13

1 player

D Mousley

2 player

J Lintott

No Correlation

0.06

1 player

D Mousley

2 player

J Bethell

No Correlation

-0.13

1 player

D Mousley

2 player

C Benjamin

No Correlation

0.12

1 player

S Hain

2 player

G Garton

No Correlation

0.15

1 player

S Hain

2 player

A Davies

No Correlation

0.11

1 player

S Hain

2 player

D Mousley

No Correlation

1

1 player

S Hain

2 player

S Hain

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.11

1 player

S Hain

2 player

E Barnard

No Correlation

0.31

1 player

S Hain

2 player

D Briggs

Weak Positive Correlation

0.17

1 player

S Hain

2 player

C Miles

No Correlation

0.08

1 player

S Hain

2 player

J Lintott

No Correlation

0.23

1 player

S Hain

2 player

J Bethell

Weak Positive Correlation

0.06

1 player

S Hain

2 player

C Benjamin

No Correlation

0.25

1 player

E Barnard

2 player

G Garton

Weak Positive Correlation

0.12

1 player

E Barnard

2 player

A Davies

No Correlation

-0.03

1 player

E Barnard

2 player

D Mousley

No Correlation

-0.11

1 player

E Barnard

2 player

S Hain

No Correlation

1

1 player

E Barnard

2 player

E Barnard

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.17

1 player

E Barnard

2 player

D Briggs

No Correlation

0.17

1 player

E Barnard

2 player

C Miles

No Correlation

0.21

1 player

E Barnard

2 player

J Lintott

Weak Positive Correlation

0.45

1 player

E Barnard

2 player

J Bethell

Positive Correlation

0.41

1 player

E Barnard

2 player

C Benjamin

Positive Correlation

-0.19

1 player

D Briggs

2 player

G Garton

No Correlation

0.26

1 player

D Briggs

2 player

A Davies

Weak Positive Correlation

0.26

1 player

D Briggs

2 player

D Mousley

Weak Positive Correlation

0.31

1 player

D Briggs

2 player

S Hain

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.17

1 player

D Briggs

2 player

E Barnard

No Correlation

1

1 player

D Briggs

2 player

D Briggs

Strong Positive Correlation

0.27

1 player

D Briggs

2 player

C Miles

Weak Positive Correlation

0.27

1 player

D Briggs

2 player

J Lintott

Weak Positive Correlation

0.06

1 player

D Briggs

2 player

J Bethell

No Correlation

-0.1

1 player

D Briggs

2 player

C Benjamin

No Correlation

0.44

1 player

C Miles

2 player

G Garton

Positive Correlation

0.01

1 player

C Miles

2 player

A Davies

No Correlation

0.08

1 player

C Miles

2 player

D Mousley

No Correlation

0.17

1 player

C Miles

2 player

S Hain

No Correlation

0.17

1 player

C Miles

2 player

E Barnard

No Correlation

0.27

1 player

C Miles

2 player

D Briggs

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

C Miles

2 player

C Miles

Strong Positive Correlation

0.33

1 player

C Miles

2 player

J Lintott

Weak Positive Correlation

0.14

1 player

C Miles

2 player

J Bethell

No Correlation

0.25

1 player

C Miles

2 player

C Benjamin

Weak Positive Correlation

0.33

1 player

J Lintott

2 player

G Garton

Weak Positive Correlation

0.15

1 player

J Lintott

2 player

A Davies

No Correlation

0.13

1 player

J Lintott

2 player

D Mousley

No Correlation

0.08

1 player

J Lintott

2 player

S Hain

No Correlation

0.21

1 player

J Lintott

2 player

E Barnard

Weak Positive Correlation

0.27

1 player

J Lintott

2 player

D Briggs

Weak Positive Correlation

0.33

1 player

J Lintott

2 player

C Miles

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

J Lintott

2 player

J Lintott

Strong Positive Correlation

0.34

1 player

J Lintott

2 player

J Bethell

Weak Positive Correlation

0.24

1 player

J Lintott

2 player

C Benjamin

Weak Positive Correlation

0.39

1 player

J Bethell

2 player

G Garton

Weak Positive Correlation

0.39

1 player

J Bethell

2 player

A Davies

Weak Positive Correlation

0.06

1 player

J Bethell

2 player

D Mousley

No Correlation

0.23

1 player

J Bethell

2 player

S Hain

Weak Positive Correlation

0.45

1 player

J Bethell

2 player

E Barnard

Positive Correlation

0.06

1 player

J Bethell

2 player

D Briggs

No Correlation

0.14

1 player

J Bethell

2 player

C Miles

No Correlation

0.34

1 player

J Bethell

2 player

J Lintott

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

J Bethell

2 player

J Bethell

Strong Positive Correlation

0.34

1 player

J Bethell

2 player

C Benjamin

Weak Positive Correlation

0.24

1 player

C Benjamin

2 player

G Garton

Weak Positive Correlation

0.12

1 player

C Benjamin

2 player

A Davies

No Correlation

-0.13

1 player

C Benjamin

2 player

D Mousley

No Correlation

0.06

1 player

C Benjamin

2 player

S Hain

No Correlation

0.41

1 player

C Benjamin

2 player

E Barnard

Positive Correlation

-0.1

1 player

C Benjamin

2 player

D Briggs

No Correlation

0.25

1 player

C Benjamin

2 player

C Miles

Weak Positive Correlation

0.24

1 player

C Benjamin

2 player

J Lintott

Weak Positive Correlation

0.34

1 player

C Benjamin

2 player

J Bethell

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

C Benjamin

2 player

C Benjamin

Strong Positive Correlation

Strong Positive Correlation

No Correlation

Strong Negative Correlation

Pick **M Booth** and **C Miles** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **M Booth** and **J Lintott** together

Positive Correlation

Similar Perfomance

D Briggs 0.26

A Davies 0.21

J Lintott 0.13

S Hain 0.11

C Miles 0.08

G Garton 0.06

J Bethell 0.06

Opposite Perfomance

C Benjamin -0.13

E Barnard -0.03

Similar Perfomance

S Hain 0.31

C Miles 0.27

J Lintott 0.27

A Davies 0.26

D Mousley 0.26

J Bethell 0.06

Opposite Perfomance

G Garton -0.19

E Barnard -0.17

C Benjamin -0.1

Similar Perfomance

D Briggs 0.31

J Bethell 0.23

C Miles 0.17

A Davies 0.15

G Garton 0.12

D Mousley 0.11

J Lintott 0.08

C Benjamin 0.06

Opposite Perfomance

E Barnard -0.11

Similar Perfomance

G Garton 0.39

J Bethell 0.39

D Briggs 0.26

D Mousley 0.21

S Hain 0.15

J Lintott 0.15

E Barnard 0.12

C Benjamin 0.12

C Miles 0.01

Similar Perfomance

J Bethell 0.34

G Garton 0.33

C Miles 0.33

D Briggs 0.27

C Benjamin 0.24

E Barnard 0.21

A Davies 0.15

D Mousley 0.13

S Hain 0.08

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

K-Ali ll AR WOR

H Walsh BOW WOR

N Smith BOW WOR

R Jones BAT WOR

G Roderick WK WOR

J Cobb AR WOR

T Taylor AR WOR

A Finch BOW WOR

A Hose BAT WOR

E Pollock BAT WOR

E Brookes AR WOR

K-Ali ll

H Walsh

N Smith

R Jones

G Roderick

J Cobb

T Taylor

A Finch

A Hose

E Pollock

E Brookes

1

1 player

H Walsh

2 player

H Walsh

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.33

1 player

H Walsh

2 player

N Smith

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.42

1 player

H Walsh

2 player

R Jones

Negative Correlation

0.08

1 player

H Walsh

2 player

G Roderick

No Correlation

-0.08

1 player

H Walsh

2 player

T Taylor

No Correlation

0.11

1 player

H Walsh

2 player

A Finch

No Correlation

0.5

1 player

H Walsh

2 player

A Hose

Positive Correlation

0.08

1 player

H Walsh

2 player

E Pollock

No Correlation

-0.38

1 player

H Walsh

2 player

E Brookes

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.33

1 player

N Smith

2 player

H Walsh

Weak Negative Correlation

1

1 player

N Smith

2 player

N Smith

Strong Positive Correlation

0

1 player

N Smith

2 player

R Jones

No Correlation

-0.56

1 player

N Smith

2 player

G Roderick

Negative Correlation

0.56

1 player

N Smith

2 player

T Taylor

Positive Correlation

-0.25

1 player

N Smith

2 player

A Finch

Weak Negative Correlation

0.11

1 player

N Smith

2 player

A Hose

No Correlation

0.33

1 player

N Smith

2 player

E Pollock

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.33

1 player

N Smith

2 player

E Brookes

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.42

1 player

R Jones

2 player

H Walsh

Negative Correlation

0

1 player

R Jones

2 player

N Smith

No Correlation

1

1 player

R Jones

2 player

R Jones

Strong Positive Correlation

0.42

1 player

R Jones

2 player

G Roderick

Positive Correlation

-0.42

1 player

R Jones

2 player

T Taylor

Negative Correlation

-0.7

1 player

R Jones

2 player

A Finch

Negative Correlation

0

1 player

R Jones

2 player

A Hose

No Correlation

0.5

1 player

R Jones

2 player

E Pollock

Positive Correlation

-0.14

1 player

R Jones

2 player

E Brookes

No Correlation

0.08

1 player

G Roderick

2 player

H Walsh

No Correlation

-0.56

1 player

G Roderick

2 player

N Smith

Negative Correlation

0.42

1 player

G Roderick

2 player

R Jones

Positive Correlation

1

1 player

G Roderick

2 player

G Roderick

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.38

1 player

G Roderick

2 player

T Taylor

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.11

1 player

G Roderick

2 player

A Finch

No Correlation

0.17

1 player

G Roderick

2 player

A Hose

No Correlation

0.08

1 player

G Roderick

2 player

E Pollock

No Correlation

-0.08

1 player

G Roderick

2 player

E Brookes

No Correlation

-0.08

1 player

T Taylor

2 player

H Walsh

No Correlation

0.56

1 player

T Taylor

2 player

N Smith

Positive Correlation

-0.42

1 player

T Taylor

2 player

R Jones

Negative Correlation

-0.38

1 player

T Taylor

2 player

G Roderick

Weak Negative Correlation

1

1 player

T Taylor

2 player

T Taylor

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.27

1 player

T Taylor

2 player

A Finch

Weak Negative Correlation

0

1 player

T Taylor

2 player

A Hose

No Correlation

0.2

1 player

T Taylor

2 player

E Pollock

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.23

1 player

T Taylor

2 player

E Brookes

Weak Negative Correlation

0.11

1 player

A Finch

2 player

H Walsh

No Correlation

-0.25

1 player

A Finch

2 player

N Smith

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.7

1 player

A Finch

2 player

R Jones

Negative Correlation

-0.11

1 player

A Finch

2 player

G Roderick

No Correlation

-0.27

1 player

A Finch

2 player

T Taylor

Weak Negative Correlation

1

1 player

A Finch

2 player

A Finch

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.11

1 player

A Finch

2 player

A Hose

No Correlation

-0.44

1 player

A Finch

2 player

E Pollock

Negative Correlation

0.56

1 player

A Finch

2 player

E Brookes

Positive Correlation

0.5

1 player

A Hose

2 player

H Walsh

Positive Correlation

0.11

1 player

A Hose

2 player

N Smith

No Correlation

0

1 player

A Hose

2 player

R Jones

No Correlation

0.17

1 player

A Hose

2 player

G Roderick

No Correlation

0

1 player

A Hose

2 player

T Taylor

No Correlation

-0.11

1 player

A Hose

2 player

A Finch

No Correlation

1

1 player

A Hose

2 player

A Hose

Strong Positive Correlation

0.11

1 player

A Hose

2 player

E Pollock

No Correlation

-0.5

1 player

A Hose

2 player

E Brookes

Negative Correlation

0.08

1 player

E Pollock

2 player

H Walsh

No Correlation

0.33

1 player

E Pollock

2 player

N Smith

Weak Positive Correlation

0.5

1 player

E Pollock

2 player

R Jones

Positive Correlation

0.08

1 player

E Pollock

2 player

G Roderick

No Correlation

0.2

1 player

E Pollock

2 player

T Taylor

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.44

1 player

E Pollock

2 player

A Finch

Negative Correlation

0.11

1 player

E Pollock

2 player

A Hose

No Correlation

1

1 player

E Pollock

2 player

E Pollock

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.69

1 player

E Pollock

2 player

E Brookes

Negative Correlation

-0.38

1 player

E Brookes

2 player

H Walsh

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.33

1 player

E Brookes

2 player

N Smith

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.14

1 player

E Brookes

2 player

R Jones

No Correlation

-0.08

1 player

E Brookes

2 player

G Roderick

No Correlation

-0.23

1 player

E Brookes

2 player

T Taylor

Weak Negative Correlation

0.56

1 player

E Brookes

2 player

A Finch

Positive Correlation

-0.5

1 player

E Brookes

2 player

A Hose

Negative Correlation

-0.69

1 player

E Brookes

2 player

E Pollock

Negative Correlation

1

1 player

E Brookes

2 player

E Brookes

Strong Positive Correlation

Strong Positive Correlation

No Correlation

Strong Negative Correlation

No data found

Pick **K-Ali ll** and **A Finch** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **R Jones** and **A Finch** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **J Cobb** and **T Taylor** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **E Pollock** and **E Brookes** together

Negative Correlation

Similar Perfomance

H Walsh 0.5

G Roderick 0.17

N Smith 0.11

E Pollock 0.11

Opposite Perfomance

E Brookes -0.5

A Finch -0.11

Similar Perfomance

N Smith 0.56

E Pollock 0.2

Opposite Perfomance

R Jones -0.42

G Roderick -0.38

A Finch -0.27

E Brookes -0.23

H Walsh -0.08

Similar Perfomance

E Brookes 0.56

H Walsh 0.11

Opposite Perfomance

R Jones -0.7

E Pollock -0.44

T Taylor -0.27

N Smith -0.25

G Roderick -0.11

A Hose -0.11

Similar Perfomance

A Finch 0.56

Opposite Perfomance

E Pollock -0.69

A Hose -0.5

H Walsh -0.38

N Smith -0.33

T Taylor -0.23

R Jones -0.14

G Roderick -0.08

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

M Booth BOW WAS

G Garton BOW WAS

A Davies WK WAS

D Mousley AR WAS

S Hain BAT WAS

E Barnard AR WAS

D Briggs BOW WAS

C Miles BOW WAS

J Lintott BOW WAS

J Bethell BAT WAS

C Benjamin WK WAS

M Booth

G Garton

A Davies

D Mousley

S Hain

E Barnard

D Briggs

C Miles

J Lintott

J Bethell

C Benjamin

1

1 player

G Garton

2 player

G Garton

Strong Positive Correlation

0.2

1 player

G Garton

2 player

A Davies

Weak Positive Correlation

0

1 player

G Garton

2 player

D Mousley

No Correlation

0

1 player

G Garton

2 player

S Hain

No Correlation

0.67

1 player

G Garton

2 player

E Barnard

Positive Correlation

-0.33

1 player

G Garton

2 player

D Briggs

Weak Negative Correlation

0.14

1 player

G Garton

2 player

C Miles

No Correlation

0.09

1 player

G Garton

2 player

J Lintott

No Correlation

0.27

1 player

G Garton

2 player

J Bethell

Weak Positive Correlation

0

1 player

G Garton

2 player

C Benjamin

No Correlation

0.2

1 player

A Davies

2 player

G Garton

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

A Davies

2 player

A Davies

Strong Positive Correlation

0.15

1 player

A Davies

2 player

D Mousley

No Correlation

-0.24

1 player

A Davies

2 player

S Hain

Weak Negative Correlation

0.2

1 player

A Davies

2 player

E Barnard

Weak Positive Correlation

0

1 player

A Davies

2 player

D Briggs

No Correlation

-0.5

1 player

A Davies

2 player

C Miles

Negative Correlation

-0.28

1 player

A Davies

2 player

J Lintott

Weak Negative Correlation

0.2

1 player

A Davies

2 player

J Bethell

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.36

1 player

A Davies

2 player

C Benjamin

Weak Negative Correlation

0

1 player

D Mousley

2 player

G Garton

No Correlation

0.15

1 player

D Mousley

2 player

A Davies

No Correlation

1

1 player

D Mousley

2 player

D Mousley

Strong Positive Correlation

0.18

1 player

D Mousley

2 player

S Hain

No Correlation

0

1 player

D Mousley

2 player

E Barnard

No Correlation

0.17

1 player

D Mousley

2 player

D Briggs

No Correlation

0.09

1 player

D Mousley

2 player

C Miles

No Correlation

0

1 player

D Mousley

2 player

J Lintott

No Correlation

-0.26

1 player

D Mousley

2 player

J Bethell

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.19

1 player

D Mousley

2 player

C Benjamin

No Correlation

0

1 player

S Hain

2 player

G Garton

No Correlation

-0.24

1 player

S Hain

2 player

A Davies

Weak Negative Correlation

0.18

1 player

S Hain

2 player

D Mousley

No Correlation

1

1 player

S Hain

2 player

S Hain

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.56

1 player

S Hain

2 player

E Barnard

Negative Correlation

0.3

1 player

S Hain

2 player

D Briggs

Weak Positive Correlation

0.27

1 player

S Hain

2 player

C Miles

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.26

1 player

S Hain

2 player

J Lintott

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.29

1 player

S Hain

2 player

J Bethell

Weak Negative Correlation

0

1 player

S Hain

2 player

C Benjamin

No Correlation

0.67

1 player

E Barnard

2 player

G Garton

Positive Correlation

0.2

1 player

E Barnard

2 player

A Davies

Weak Positive Correlation

0

1 player

E Barnard

2 player

D Mousley

No Correlation

-0.56

1 player

E Barnard

2 player

S Hain

Negative Correlation

1

1 player

E Barnard

2 player

E Barnard

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.6

1 player

E Barnard

2 player

D Briggs

Negative Correlation

0.11

1 player

E Barnard

2 player

C Miles

No Correlation

-0.2

1 player

E Barnard

2 player

J Lintott

No Correlation

0.27

1 player

E Barnard

2 player

J Bethell

Weak Positive Correlation

0.41

1 player

E Barnard

2 player

C Benjamin

Positive Correlation

-0.33

1 player

D Briggs

2 player

G Garton

Weak Negative Correlation

0

1 player

D Briggs

2 player

A Davies

No Correlation

0.17

1 player

D Briggs

2 player

D Mousley

No Correlation

0.3

1 player

D Briggs

2 player

S Hain

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.6

1 player

D Briggs

2 player

E Barnard

Negative Correlation

1

1 player

D Briggs

2 player

D Briggs

Strong Positive Correlation

0.17

1 player

D Briggs

2 player

C Miles

No Correlation

0.13

1 player

D Briggs

2 player

J Lintott

No Correlation

-0.18

1 player

D Briggs

2 player

J Bethell

No Correlation

-0.23

1 player

D Briggs

2 player

C Benjamin

Weak Negative Correlation

0.14

1 player

C Miles

2 player

G Garton

No Correlation

-0.5

1 player

C Miles

2 player

A Davies

Negative Correlation

0.09

1 player

C Miles

2 player

D Mousley

No Correlation

0.27

1 player

C Miles

2 player

S Hain

Weak Positive Correlation

0.11

1 player

C Miles

2 player

E Barnard

No Correlation

0.17

1 player

C Miles

2 player

D Briggs

No Correlation

1

1 player

C Miles

2 player

C Miles

Strong Positive Correlation

0.2

1 player

C Miles

2 player

J Lintott

Weak Positive Correlation

0.42

1 player

C Miles

2 player

J Bethell

Positive Correlation

0.08

1 player

C Miles

2 player

C Benjamin

No Correlation

0.09

1 player

J Lintott

2 player

G Garton

No Correlation

-0.28

1 player

J Lintott

2 player

A Davies

Weak Negative Correlation

0

1 player

J Lintott

2 player

D Mousley

No Correlation

-0.26

1 player

J Lintott

2 player

S Hain

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.2

1 player

J Lintott

2 player

E Barnard

No Correlation

0.13

1 player

J Lintott

2 player

D Briggs

No Correlation

0.2

1 player

J Lintott

2 player

C Miles

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

J Lintott

2 player

J Lintott

Strong Positive Correlation

0.4

1 player

J Lintott

2 player

J Bethell

Positive Correlation

-0.11

1 player

J Lintott

2 player

C Benjamin

No Correlation

0.27

1 player

J Bethell

2 player

G Garton

Weak Positive Correlation

0.2

1 player

J Bethell

2 player

A Davies

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.26

1 player

J Bethell

2 player

D Mousley

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.29

1 player

J Bethell

2 player

S Hain

Weak Negative Correlation

0.27

1 player

J Bethell

2 player

E Barnard

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.18

1 player

J Bethell

2 player

D Briggs

No Correlation

0.42

1 player

J Bethell

2 player

C Miles

Positive Correlation

0.4

1 player

J Bethell

2 player

J Lintott

Positive Correlation

1

1 player

J Bethell

2 player

J Bethell

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.14

1 player

J Bethell

2 player

C Benjamin

No Correlation

0

1 player

C Benjamin

2 player

G Garton

No Correlation

-0.36

1 player

C Benjamin

2 player

A Davies

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.19

1 player

C Benjamin

2 player

D Mousley

No Correlation

0

1 player

C Benjamin

2 player

S Hain

No Correlation

0.41

1 player

C Benjamin

2 player

E Barnard

Positive Correlation

-0.23

1 player

C Benjamin

2 player

D Briggs

Weak Negative Correlation

0.08

1 player

C Benjamin

2 player

C Miles

No Correlation

-0.11

1 player

C Benjamin

2 player

J Lintott

No Correlation

-0.14

1 player

C Benjamin

2 player

J Bethell

No Correlation

1

1 player

C Benjamin

2 player

C Benjamin

Strong Positive Correlation

Strong Positive Correlation

No Correlation

Strong Negative Correlation

Pick **M Booth** and **A Davies** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **G Garton** and **E Barnard** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **M Booth** and **D Mousley** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **M Booth** and **S Hain** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **E Barnard** and **D Briggs** together

Negative Correlation

Similar Perfomance

S Hain 0.18

D Briggs 0.17

A Davies 0.15

C Miles 0.09

Opposite Perfomance

J Bethell -0.26

C Benjamin -0.19

Similar Perfomance

G Garton 0.2

E Barnard 0.2

J Bethell 0.2

D Mousley 0.15

Opposite Perfomance

C Miles -0.5

C Benjamin -0.36

J Lintott -0.28

S Hain -0.24

Similar Perfomance

S Hain 0.3

D Mousley 0.17

C Miles 0.17

J Lintott 0.13

Opposite Perfomance

E Barnard -0.6

G Garton -0.33

C Benjamin -0.23

J Bethell -0.18

Similar Perfomance

J Bethell 0.4

C Miles 0.2

D Briggs 0.13

G Garton 0.09

Opposite Perfomance

A Davies -0.28

S Hain -0.26

E Barnard -0.2

C Benjamin -0.11

Similar Perfomance

D Briggs 0.3

C Miles 0.27

D Mousley 0.18

Opposite Perfomance

E Barnard -0.56

J Bethell -0.29

J Lintott -0.26

A Davies -0.24