Upcoming
Fixtures
View All
AA 10 Feb 03:00 am OV

Lineup Out

University Oval
New Zealand Domestic One Day Trophy

Best Player Combinations For
AA vs OV

How it Works?

This guide is super useful for identifying player combinations that are likely to score big. Use the filters to identify the best player combinations according to specific match scenarios.

Player correlate positively

Both players generally perform similarly when picked together. They either score high together or score low together. Maximise FPts by picking players that correlate positively with top players.

Player correlate negatively

Both players generally perform in an opposite manner. If one player scores high, the other usually scores low. Avoid picking players that correlate negatively with top player

More on PL Labs

AA vs OV

Show Player Combinations on the basis of:

Best AA Player Combinations

Best AA Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
M Sclanders BAT AA
H Johal AR AA
B Jacobs BAT AA
Lachlan Stackpole BAT AA
A Olliver BOW AA
J McKenzie AR AA
S Solia AR AA
L Delport BOW AA
D Ferns BOW AA
C Fletcher WK AA
M Sclanders
H Johal
B Jacobs
Lachlan Stackpole
A Olliver
J McKenzie
S Solia
L Delport
D Ferns
C Fletcher
1
1 player
M Sclanders
2 player
M Sclanders
Strong Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
M Sclanders
2 player
H Johal
Positive Correlation
-0.15
1 player
M Sclanders
2 player
B Jacobs
No Correlation
0
1 player
M Sclanders
2 player
Lachlan Stackpole
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
M Sclanders
2 player
A Olliver
Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
M Sclanders
2 player
J McKenzie
Weak Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
M Sclanders
2 player
S Solia
No Correlation
0
1 player
M Sclanders
2 player
L Delport
No Correlation
-1
1 player
M Sclanders
2 player
D Ferns
Strong Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
M Sclanders
2 player
C Fletcher
Weak Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
H Johal
2 player
M Sclanders
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
H Johal
2 player
H Johal
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
H Johal
2 player
B Jacobs
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
H Johal
2 player
Lachlan Stackpole
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
H Johal
2 player
A Olliver
Strong Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
H Johal
2 player
J McKenzie
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
H Johal
2 player
S Solia
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
H Johal
2 player
L Delport
Positive Correlation
-0.4
1 player
H Johal
2 player
D Ferns
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
H Johal
2 player
C Fletcher
No Correlation
-0.15
1 player
B Jacobs
2 player
M Sclanders
No Correlation
0
1 player
B Jacobs
2 player
H Johal
No Correlation
1
1 player
B Jacobs
2 player
B Jacobs
Strong Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
B Jacobs
2 player
Lachlan Stackpole
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.2
1 player
B Jacobs
2 player
A Olliver
No Correlation
0.44
1 player
B Jacobs
2 player
J McKenzie
Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
B Jacobs
2 player
S Solia
Weak Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
B Jacobs
2 player
L Delport
Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
B Jacobs
2 player
D Ferns
Weak Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
B Jacobs
2 player
C Fletcher
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
Lachlan Stackpole
2 player
M Sclanders
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
Lachlan Stackpole
2 player
H Johal
Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
Lachlan Stackpole
2 player
B Jacobs
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
Lachlan Stackpole
2 player
Lachlan Stackpole
Strong Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
Lachlan Stackpole
2 player
A Olliver
Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
Lachlan Stackpole
2 player
J McKenzie
No Correlation
-0.23
1 player
Lachlan Stackpole
2 player
S Solia
Weak Negative Correlation
0.85
1 player
Lachlan Stackpole
2 player
L Delport
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.13
1 player
Lachlan Stackpole
2 player
D Ferns
No Correlation
-0.1
1 player
Lachlan Stackpole
2 player
C Fletcher
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
A Olliver
2 player
M Sclanders
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
A Olliver
2 player
H Johal
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.2
1 player
A Olliver
2 player
B Jacobs
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
A Olliver
2 player
Lachlan Stackpole
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
A Olliver
2 player
A Olliver
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.3
1 player
A Olliver
2 player
J McKenzie
Weak Negative Correlation
0.5
1 player
A Olliver
2 player
S Solia
Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
A Olliver
2 player
L Delport
No Correlation
0.3
1 player
A Olliver
2 player
D Ferns
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
A Olliver
2 player
C Fletcher
Weak Negative Correlation
0.23
1 player
J McKenzie
2 player
M Sclanders
Weak Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
J McKenzie
2 player
H Johal
Positive Correlation
0.44
1 player
J McKenzie
2 player
B Jacobs
Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
J McKenzie
2 player
Lachlan Stackpole
No Correlation
-0.3
1 player
J McKenzie
2 player
A Olliver
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
J McKenzie
2 player
J McKenzie
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.03
1 player
J McKenzie
2 player
S Solia
No Correlation
0.21
1 player
J McKenzie
2 player
L Delport
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
J McKenzie
2 player
D Ferns
Weak Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
J McKenzie
2 player
C Fletcher
Weak Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
S Solia
2 player
M Sclanders
No Correlation
0
1 player
S Solia
2 player
H Johal
No Correlation
0.31
1 player
S Solia
2 player
B Jacobs
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
S Solia
2 player
Lachlan Stackpole
Weak Negative Correlation
0.5
1 player
S Solia
2 player
A Olliver
Positive Correlation
-0.03
1 player
S Solia
2 player
J McKenzie
No Correlation
1
1 player
S Solia
2 player
S Solia
Strong Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
S Solia
2 player
L Delport
No Correlation
0.34
1 player
S Solia
2 player
D Ferns
Weak Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
S Solia
2 player
C Fletcher
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
L Delport
2 player
M Sclanders
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
L Delport
2 player
H Johal
Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
L Delport
2 player
B Jacobs
Positive Correlation
0.85
1 player
L Delport
2 player
Lachlan Stackpole
Strong Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
L Delport
2 player
A Olliver
No Correlation
0.21
1 player
L Delport
2 player
J McKenzie
Weak Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
L Delport
2 player
S Solia
No Correlation
1
1 player
L Delport
2 player
L Delport
Strong Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
L Delport
2 player
D Ferns
Weak Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
L Delport
2 player
C Fletcher
Weak Positive Correlation
-1
1 player
D Ferns
2 player
M Sclanders
Strong Negative Correlation
-0.4
1 player
D Ferns
2 player
H Johal
Weak Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
D Ferns
2 player
B Jacobs
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.13
1 player
D Ferns
2 player
Lachlan Stackpole
No Correlation
0.3
1 player
D Ferns
2 player
A Olliver
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
D Ferns
2 player
J McKenzie
Weak Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
D Ferns
2 player
S Solia
Weak Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
D Ferns
2 player
L Delport
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
D Ferns
2 player
D Ferns
Strong Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
D Ferns
2 player
C Fletcher
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
C Fletcher
2 player
M Sclanders
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
C Fletcher
2 player
H Johal
No Correlation
0.3
1 player
C Fletcher
2 player
B Jacobs
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.1
1 player
C Fletcher
2 player
Lachlan Stackpole
No Correlation
-0.35
1 player
C Fletcher
2 player
A Olliver
Weak Negative Correlation
0.38
1 player
C Fletcher
2 player
J McKenzie
Weak Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
C Fletcher
2 player
S Solia
Weak Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
C Fletcher
2 player
L Delport
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
C Fletcher
2 player
D Ferns
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
C Fletcher
2 player
C Fletcher
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick H Johal and Lachlan Stackpole together
Positive Correlation

Pick H Johal and A Olliver together
Strong Positive Correlation

Pick H Johal and L Delport together
Positive Correlation

Pick Lachlan Stackpole and A Olliver together
Positive Correlation

Pick Lachlan Stackpole and L Delport together
Strong Positive Correlation

Don’t Pick M Sclanders and D Ferns together
Strong Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 S Solia

AR
Similar Perfomance
A Olliver 0.5
D Ferns 0.34
B Jacobs 0.31
C Fletcher 0.3
M Sclanders 0.13
L Delport 0.11
Opposite Perfomance
Lachlan Stackpole -0.23
J McKenzie -0.03

2 D Ferns

BOW
Similar Perfomance
C Fletcher 0.35
S Solia 0.34
B Jacobs 0.33
L Delport 0.31
A Olliver 0.3
J McKenzie 0.28
Opposite Perfomance
M Sclanders -1
H Johal -0.4
Lachlan Stackpole -0.13

3 L Delport

BOW
Similar Perfomance
Lachlan Stackpole 0.85
H Johal 0.7
B Jacobs 0.42
C Fletcher 0.38
D Ferns 0.31
J McKenzie 0.21
A Olliver 0.15
S Solia 0.11

4 C Fletcher

WK
Similar Perfomance
J McKenzie 0.38
L Delport 0.38
D Ferns 0.35
M Sclanders 0.33
B Jacobs 0.3
S Solia 0.3
Opposite Perfomance
A Olliver -0.35
Lachlan Stackpole -0.1

5 J McKenzie

AR
Similar Perfomance
B Jacobs 0.44
H Johal 0.4
C Fletcher 0.38
D Ferns 0.28
M Sclanders 0.23
L Delport 0.21
Lachlan Stackpole 0.13
Opposite Perfomance
A Olliver -0.3
S Solia -0.03

Best OV Player Combinations

Best OV Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
J Todd BAT OV
M Clarke BOW OV
D Phillips BAT OV
M Chu WK OV
J Gibson AR OV
D Foxcroft AR OV
L Carter BAT OV
A Hazeldine BOW OV
M Bacon BOW OV
L Johnson BAT OV
B Lockrose BOW OV
J Todd
M Clarke
D Phillips
M Chu
J Gibson
D Foxcroft
L Carter
A Hazeldine
M Bacon
L Johnson
B Lockrose
1
1 player
J Todd
2 player
J Todd
Strong Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
J Todd
2 player
M Clarke
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
J Todd
2 player
D Phillips
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
J Todd
2 player
M Chu
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
J Todd
2 player
J Gibson
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.15
1 player
J Todd
2 player
D Foxcroft
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
J Todd
2 player
L Carter
Positive Correlation
0.55
1 player
J Todd
2 player
A Hazeldine
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
J Todd
2 player
M Bacon
Strong Positive Correlation
0.55
1 player
J Todd
2 player
L Johnson
Positive Correlation
-0.2
1 player
J Todd
2 player
B Lockrose
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Clarke
2 player
J Todd
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M Clarke
2 player
M Clarke
Strong Positive Correlation
-1
1 player
M Clarke
2 player
D Phillips
Strong Negative Correlation
0
1 player
M Clarke
2 player
M Chu
No Correlation
-0.4
1 player
M Clarke
2 player
J Gibson
Weak Negative Correlation
-1
1 player
M Clarke
2 player
D Foxcroft
Strong Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Clarke
2 player
L Carter
Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
M Clarke
2 player
A Hazeldine
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Clarke
2 player
M Bacon
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M Clarke
2 player
L Johnson
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.4
1 player
M Clarke
2 player
B Lockrose
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
D Phillips
2 player
J Todd
No Correlation
-1
1 player
D Phillips
2 player
M Clarke
Strong Negative Correlation
1
1 player
D Phillips
2 player
D Phillips
Strong Positive Correlation
0.04
1 player
D Phillips
2 player
M Chu
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
D Phillips
2 player
J Gibson
No Correlation
0.18
1 player
D Phillips
2 player
D Foxcroft
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
D Phillips
2 player
L Carter
Weak Positive Correlation
0.41
1 player
D Phillips
2 player
A Hazeldine
Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
D Phillips
2 player
M Bacon
Weak Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
D Phillips
2 player
L Johnson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
D Phillips
2 player
B Lockrose
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
M Chu
2 player
J Todd
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
M Chu
2 player
M Clarke
No Correlation
0.04
1 player
M Chu
2 player
D Phillips
No Correlation
1
1 player
M Chu
2 player
M Chu
Strong Positive Correlation
0.57
1 player
M Chu
2 player
J Gibson
Positive Correlation
0.51
1 player
M Chu
2 player
D Foxcroft
Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
M Chu
2 player
L Carter
Weak Positive Correlation
0.01
1 player
M Chu
2 player
A Hazeldine
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
M Chu
2 player
M Bacon
Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
M Chu
2 player
L Johnson
No Correlation
0.32
1 player
M Chu
2 player
B Lockrose
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
J Gibson
2 player
J Todd
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.4
1 player
J Gibson
2 player
M Clarke
Weak Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
J Gibson
2 player
D Phillips
No Correlation
0.57
1 player
J Gibson
2 player
M Chu
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
J Gibson
2 player
J Gibson
Strong Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
J Gibson
2 player
D Foxcroft
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
J Gibson
2 player
L Carter
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
J Gibson
2 player
A Hazeldine
Weak Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
J Gibson
2 player
M Bacon
Weak Positive Correlation
0.06
1 player
J Gibson
2 player
L Johnson
No Correlation
0.46
1 player
J Gibson
2 player
B Lockrose
Positive Correlation
-0.15
1 player
D Foxcroft
2 player
J Todd
No Correlation
-1
1 player
D Foxcroft
2 player
M Clarke
Strong Negative Correlation
0.18
1 player
D Foxcroft
2 player
D Phillips
No Correlation
0.51
1 player
D Foxcroft
2 player
M Chu
Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
D Foxcroft
2 player
J Gibson
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
D Foxcroft
2 player
D Foxcroft
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.06
1 player
D Foxcroft
2 player
L Carter
No Correlation
0.1
1 player
D Foxcroft
2 player
A Hazeldine
No Correlation
0.21
1 player
D Foxcroft
2 player
M Bacon
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
D Foxcroft
2 player
L Johnson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
D Foxcroft
2 player
B Lockrose
Weak Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
L Carter
2 player
J Todd
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
L Carter
2 player
M Clarke
Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
L Carter
2 player
D Phillips
Weak Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
L Carter
2 player
M Chu
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
L Carter
2 player
J Gibson
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.06
1 player
L Carter
2 player
D Foxcroft
No Correlation
1
1 player
L Carter
2 player
L Carter
Strong Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
L Carter
2 player
A Hazeldine
Weak Positive Correlation
0.52
1 player
L Carter
2 player
M Bacon
Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
L Carter
2 player
L Johnson
Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
L Carter
2 player
B Lockrose
No Correlation
0.55
1 player
A Hazeldine
2 player
J Todd
Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
A Hazeldine
2 player
M Clarke
Positive Correlation
0.41
1 player
A Hazeldine
2 player
D Phillips
Positive Correlation
0.01
1 player
A Hazeldine
2 player
M Chu
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
A Hazeldine
2 player
J Gibson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
A Hazeldine
2 player
D Foxcroft
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
A Hazeldine
2 player
L Carter
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
A Hazeldine
2 player
A Hazeldine
Strong Positive Correlation
0.57
1 player
A Hazeldine
2 player
M Bacon
Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
A Hazeldine
2 player
L Johnson
No Correlation
0.47
1 player
A Hazeldine
2 player
B Lockrose
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M Bacon
2 player
J Todd
Strong Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Bacon
2 player
M Clarke
Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
M Bacon
2 player
D Phillips
Weak Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
M Bacon
2 player
M Chu
Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
M Bacon
2 player
J Gibson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
M Bacon
2 player
D Foxcroft
Weak Positive Correlation
0.52
1 player
M Bacon
2 player
L Carter
Positive Correlation
0.57
1 player
M Bacon
2 player
A Hazeldine
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M Bacon
2 player
M Bacon
Strong Positive Correlation
0.19
1 player
M Bacon
2 player
L Johnson
No Correlation
0.37
1 player
M Bacon
2 player
B Lockrose
Weak Positive Correlation
0.55
1 player
L Johnson
2 player
J Todd
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
L Johnson
2 player
M Clarke
Strong Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
L Johnson
2 player
D Phillips
Weak Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
L Johnson
2 player
M Chu
No Correlation
0.06
1 player
L Johnson
2 player
J Gibson
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
L Johnson
2 player
D Foxcroft
Weak Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
L Johnson
2 player
L Carter
Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
L Johnson
2 player
A Hazeldine
No Correlation
0.19
1 player
L Johnson
2 player
M Bacon
No Correlation
1
1 player
L Johnson
2 player
L Johnson
Strong Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
L Johnson
2 player
B Lockrose
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.2
1 player
B Lockrose
2 player
J Todd
No Correlation
-0.4
1 player
B Lockrose
2 player
M Clarke
Weak Negative Correlation
0.24
1 player
B Lockrose
2 player
D Phillips
Weak Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
B Lockrose
2 player
M Chu
Weak Positive Correlation
0.46
1 player
B Lockrose
2 player
J Gibson
Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
B Lockrose
2 player
D Foxcroft
Weak Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
B Lockrose
2 player
L Carter
No Correlation
0.47
1 player
B Lockrose
2 player
A Hazeldine
Positive Correlation
0.37
1 player
B Lockrose
2 player
M Bacon
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
B Lockrose
2 player
L Johnson
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
B Lockrose
2 player
B Lockrose
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick J Todd and M Clarke together
Positive Correlation

Pick J Todd and L Carter together
Positive Correlation

Pick J Todd and M Bacon together
Strong Positive Correlation

Pick M Clarke and L Carter together
Positive Correlation

Pick M Clarke and M Bacon together
Positive Correlation

Pick M Clarke and L Johnson together
Strong Positive Correlation

Don’t pick M Clarke and D Phillips in the same lineup
Strong Negative Correlation

Don’t pick M Clarke and D Foxcroft in the same lineup
Strong Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 M Bacon

BOW
Similar Perfomance
J Todd 1
M Clarke 0.7
A Hazeldine 0.57
L Carter 0.52
M Chu 0.4
B Lockrose 0.37
D Phillips 0.36
J Gibson 0.21
D Foxcroft 0.21
L Johnson 0.19

2 D Phillips

BAT
Similar Perfomance
A Hazeldine 0.41
M Bacon 0.36
L Johnson 0.31
B Lockrose 0.24
L Carter 0.23
D Foxcroft 0.18
J Gibson 0.14
M Chu 0.04
Opposite Perfomance
M Clarke -1

3 B Lockrose

BOW
Similar Perfomance
A Hazeldine 0.47
J Gibson 0.46
M Bacon 0.37
M Chu 0.32
L Johnson 0.25
D Phillips 0.24
D Foxcroft 0.23
L Carter 0.08
Opposite Perfomance
M Clarke -0.4
J Todd -0.2

4 D Foxcroft

AR
Similar Perfomance
M Chu 0.51
L Johnson 0.28
J Gibson 0.26
B Lockrose 0.23
M Bacon 0.21
D Phillips 0.18
A Hazeldine 0.1
Opposite Perfomance
M Clarke -1
J Todd -0.15
L Carter -0.06

5 M Chu

WK
Similar Perfomance
J Gibson 0.57
D Foxcroft 0.51
M Bacon 0.4
B Lockrose 0.32
L Carter 0.31
J Todd 0.2
L Johnson 0.17
D Phillips 0.04
A Hazeldine 0.01

Best AA Player Combinations

Best AA Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
M Sclanders BAT AA
H Johal AR AA
B Jacobs BAT AA
Lachlan Stackpole BAT AA
A Olliver BOW AA
J McKenzie AR AA
S Solia AR AA
L Delport BOW AA
D Ferns BOW AA
C Fletcher WK AA
M Sclanders
H Johal
B Jacobs
Lachlan Stackpole
A Olliver
J McKenzie
S Solia
L Delport
D Ferns
C Fletcher
1
1 player
M Sclanders
2 player
M Sclanders
Strong Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Sclanders
2 player
H Johal
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
M Sclanders
2 player
B Jacobs
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
M Sclanders
2 player
Lachlan Stackpole
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Sclanders
2 player
A Olliver
Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
M Sclanders
2 player
J McKenzie
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
M Sclanders
2 player
S Solia
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
M Sclanders
2 player
L Delport
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
M Sclanders
2 player
D Ferns
Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
M Sclanders
2 player
C Fletcher
Weak Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
H Johal
2 player
M Sclanders
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
H Johal
2 player
H Johal
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
H Johal
2 player
B Jacobs
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
H Johal
2 player
Lachlan Stackpole
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
H Johal
2 player
A Olliver
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
H Johal
2 player
J McKenzie
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
H Johal
2 player
S Solia
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
H Johal
2 player
L Delport
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
H Johal
2 player
D Ferns
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
H Johal
2 player
C Fletcher
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
B Jacobs
2 player
M Sclanders
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
B Jacobs
2 player
H Johal
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
B Jacobs
2 player
B Jacobs
Strong Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
B Jacobs
2 player
Lachlan Stackpole
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
B Jacobs
2 player
A Olliver
Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
B Jacobs
2 player
J McKenzie
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
B Jacobs
2 player
S Solia
No Correlation
0.67
1 player
B Jacobs
2 player
L Delport
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
B Jacobs
2 player
D Ferns
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
B Jacobs
2 player
C Fletcher
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
Lachlan Stackpole
2 player
M Sclanders
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
Lachlan Stackpole
2 player
H Johal
Negative Correlation
0.23
1 player
Lachlan Stackpole
2 player
B Jacobs
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
Lachlan Stackpole
2 player
Lachlan Stackpole
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
Lachlan Stackpole
2 player
A Olliver
Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
Lachlan Stackpole
2 player
J McKenzie
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
Lachlan Stackpole
2 player
S Solia
Weak Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
Lachlan Stackpole
2 player
L Delport
Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
Lachlan Stackpole
2 player
D Ferns
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
Lachlan Stackpole
2 player
C Fletcher
Weak Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
A Olliver
2 player
M Sclanders
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
A Olliver
2 player
H Johal
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
A Olliver
2 player
B Jacobs
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
A Olliver
2 player
Lachlan Stackpole
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
A Olliver
2 player
A Olliver
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
A Olliver
2 player
J McKenzie
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
A Olliver
2 player
S Solia
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
A Olliver
2 player
L Delport
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
A Olliver
2 player
D Ferns
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
A Olliver
2 player
C Fletcher
Negative Correlation
0.23
1 player
J McKenzie
2 player
M Sclanders
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
J McKenzie
2 player
H Johal
Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
J McKenzie
2 player
B Jacobs
No Correlation
-0.23
1 player
J McKenzie
2 player
Lachlan Stackpole
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
J McKenzie
2 player
A Olliver
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
J McKenzie
2 player
J McKenzie
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.11
1 player
J McKenzie
2 player
S Solia
No Correlation
-0.09
1 player
J McKenzie
2 player
L Delport
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
J McKenzie
2 player
D Ferns
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
J McKenzie
2 player
C Fletcher
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
S Solia
2 player
M Sclanders
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
S Solia
2 player
H Johal
Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
S Solia
2 player
B Jacobs
No Correlation
-0.23
1 player
S Solia
2 player
Lachlan Stackpole
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
S Solia
2 player
A Olliver
No Correlation
-0.11
1 player
S Solia
2 player
J McKenzie
No Correlation
1
1 player
S Solia
2 player
S Solia
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.18
1 player
S Solia
2 player
L Delport
No Correlation
-0.06
1 player
S Solia
2 player
D Ferns
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
S Solia
2 player
C Fletcher
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
L Delport
2 player
M Sclanders
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
L Delport
2 player
H Johal
Negative Correlation
0.67
1 player
L Delport
2 player
B Jacobs
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
L Delport
2 player
Lachlan Stackpole
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
L Delport
2 player
A Olliver
Negative Correlation
-0.09
1 player
L Delport
2 player
J McKenzie
No Correlation
-0.18
1 player
L Delport
2 player
S Solia
No Correlation
1
1 player
L Delport
2 player
L Delport
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.11
1 player
L Delport
2 player
D Ferns
No Correlation
0.18
1 player
L Delport
2 player
C Fletcher
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
D Ferns
2 player
M Sclanders
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
D Ferns
2 player
H Johal
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
D Ferns
2 player
B Jacobs
No Correlation
-0.23
1 player
D Ferns
2 player
Lachlan Stackpole
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
D Ferns
2 player
A Olliver
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
D Ferns
2 player
J McKenzie
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.06
1 player
D Ferns
2 player
S Solia
No Correlation
-0.11
1 player
D Ferns
2 player
L Delport
No Correlation
1
1 player
D Ferns
2 player
D Ferns
Strong Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
D Ferns
2 player
C Fletcher
Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
C Fletcher
2 player
M Sclanders
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
C Fletcher
2 player
H Johal
Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
C Fletcher
2 player
B Jacobs
No Correlation
-0.23
1 player
C Fletcher
2 player
Lachlan Stackpole
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
C Fletcher
2 player
A Olliver
Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
C Fletcher
2 player
J McKenzie
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
C Fletcher
2 player
S Solia
Weak Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
C Fletcher
2 player
L Delport
No Correlation
0.47
1 player
C Fletcher
2 player
D Ferns
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
C Fletcher
2 player
C Fletcher
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick M Sclanders and H Johal together
Positive Correlation

Pick M Sclanders and A Olliver together
Positive Correlation

Pick B Jacobs and L Delport together
Positive Correlation

Pick M Sclanders and B Jacobs together
Negative Correlation

Pick M Sclanders and Lachlan Stackpole together
Negative Correlation

Pick H Johal and B Jacobs together
Negative Correlation

Pick H Johal and J McKenzie together
Negative Correlation

Pick H Johal and S Solia together
Negative Correlation

Pick H Johal and D Ferns together
Negative Correlation

Pick H Johal and C Fletcher together
Negative Correlation

Pick B Jacobs and A Olliver together
Negative Correlation

Pick A Olliver and J McKenzie together
Negative Correlation

Pick A Olliver and L Delport together
Negative Correlation

Pick A Olliver and C Fletcher together
Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 C Fletcher

WK
Similar Perfomance
D Ferns 0.47
S Solia 0.33
J McKenzie 0.33
L Delport 0.18
B Jacobs 0.14
Opposite Perfomance
H Johal -0.7
A Olliver -0.7
M Sclanders -0.23
Lachlan Stackpole -0.23

2 S Solia

AR
Similar Perfomance
C Fletcher 0.33
Opposite Perfomance
H Johal -0.7
M Sclanders -0.23
Lachlan Stackpole -0.23
L Delport -0.18
B Jacobs -0.14
J McKenzie -0.11
D Ferns -0.06

3 D Ferns

BOW
Similar Perfomance
C Fletcher 0.47
J McKenzie 0.33
Opposite Perfomance
M Sclanders -0.7
H Johal -0.7
Lachlan Stackpole -0.23
L Delport -0.11
S Solia -0.06

4 L Delport

BOW
Similar Perfomance
Lachlan Stackpole 0.7
B Jacobs 0.67
C Fletcher 0.18
Opposite Perfomance
H Johal -0.7
A Olliver -0.7
M Sclanders -0.23
S Solia -0.18
D Ferns -0.11
J McKenzie -0.09

5 J McKenzie

AR
Similar Perfomance
D Ferns 0.33
C Fletcher 0.33
M Sclanders 0.23
B Jacobs 0.14
Opposite Perfomance
H Johal -0.7
A Olliver -0.7
Lachlan Stackpole -0.23
S Solia -0.11
L Delport -0.09

Best OV Player Combinations

Best OV Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
J Todd BAT OV
M Clarke BOW OV
D Phillips BAT OV
M Chu WK OV
J Gibson AR OV
D Foxcroft AR OV
L Carter BAT OV
A Hazeldine BOW OV
M Bacon BOW OV
L Johnson BAT OV
B Lockrose BOW OV
J Todd
M Clarke
D Phillips
M Chu
J Gibson
D Foxcroft
L Carter
A Hazeldine
M Bacon
L Johnson
B Lockrose
1
1 player
J Todd
2 player
J Todd
Strong Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
J Todd
2 player
M Clarke
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
J Todd
2 player
D Phillips
No Correlation
0
1 player
J Todd
2 player
M Chu
No Correlation
0
1 player
J Todd
2 player
J Gibson
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
J Todd
2 player
D Foxcroft
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
J Todd
2 player
L Carter
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
J Todd
2 player
A Hazeldine
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
J Todd
2 player
M Bacon
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
J Todd
2 player
L Johnson
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
J Todd
2 player
B Lockrose
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Clarke
2 player
J Todd
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M Clarke
2 player
M Clarke
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
M Clarke
2 player
D Phillips
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Clarke
2 player
M Chu
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
M Clarke
2 player
J Gibson
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
M Clarke
2 player
D Foxcroft
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Clarke
2 player
L Carter
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Clarke
2 player
A Hazeldine
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Clarke
2 player
M Bacon
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Clarke
2 player
L Johnson
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
M Clarke
2 player
B Lockrose
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
D Phillips
2 player
J Todd
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
D Phillips
2 player
M Clarke
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
D Phillips
2 player
D Phillips
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.45
1 player
D Phillips
2 player
M Chu
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
D Phillips
2 player
J Gibson
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
D Phillips
2 player
D Foxcroft
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
D Phillips
2 player
L Carter
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
D Phillips
2 player
A Hazeldine
Weak Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
D Phillips
2 player
M Bacon
No Correlation
-0.16
1 player
D Phillips
2 player
L Johnson
No Correlation
-0.09
1 player
D Phillips
2 player
B Lockrose
No Correlation
0
1 player
M Chu
2 player
J Todd
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Chu
2 player
M Clarke
Positive Correlation
-0.45
1 player
M Chu
2 player
D Phillips
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
M Chu
2 player
M Chu
Strong Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
M Chu
2 player
J Gibson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
M Chu
2 player
D Foxcroft
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
M Chu
2 player
L Carter
No Correlation
0
1 player
M Chu
2 player
A Hazeldine
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
M Chu
2 player
M Bacon
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.3
1 player
M Chu
2 player
L Johnson
Weak Negative Correlation
0.09
1 player
M Chu
2 player
B Lockrose
No Correlation
0
1 player
J Gibson
2 player
J Todd
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
J Gibson
2 player
M Clarke
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
J Gibson
2 player
D Phillips
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
J Gibson
2 player
M Chu
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
J Gibson
2 player
J Gibson
Strong Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
J Gibson
2 player
D Foxcroft
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
J Gibson
2 player
L Carter
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
J Gibson
2 player
A Hazeldine
Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
J Gibson
2 player
M Bacon
No Correlation
-0.42
1 player
J Gibson
2 player
L Johnson
Negative Correlation
0.43
1 player
J Gibson
2 player
B Lockrose
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
D Foxcroft
2 player
J Todd
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
D Foxcroft
2 player
M Clarke
Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
D Foxcroft
2 player
D Phillips
Weak Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
D Foxcroft
2 player
M Chu
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
D Foxcroft
2 player
J Gibson
No Correlation
1
1 player
D Foxcroft
2 player
D Foxcroft
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.42
1 player
D Foxcroft
2 player
L Carter
Negative Correlation
-0.2
1 player
D Foxcroft
2 player
A Hazeldine
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
D Foxcroft
2 player
M Bacon
No Correlation
-0.16
1 player
D Foxcroft
2 player
L Johnson
No Correlation
-0.2
1 player
D Foxcroft
2 player
B Lockrose
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
L Carter
2 player
J Todd
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
L Carter
2 player
M Clarke
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
L Carter
2 player
D Phillips
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
L Carter
2 player
M Chu
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
L Carter
2 player
J Gibson
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.42
1 player
L Carter
2 player
D Foxcroft
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
L Carter
2 player
L Carter
Strong Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
L Carter
2 player
A Hazeldine
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
L Carter
2 player
M Bacon
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
L Carter
2 player
L Johnson
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
L Carter
2 player
B Lockrose
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Hazeldine
2 player
J Todd
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
A Hazeldine
2 player
M Clarke
Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
A Hazeldine
2 player
D Phillips
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
A Hazeldine
2 player
M Chu
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
A Hazeldine
2 player
J Gibson
Negative Correlation
-0.2
1 player
A Hazeldine
2 player
D Foxcroft
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
A Hazeldine
2 player
L Carter
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
A Hazeldine
2 player
A Hazeldine
Strong Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
A Hazeldine
2 player
M Bacon
Positive Correlation
-0.2
1 player
A Hazeldine
2 player
L Johnson
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
A Hazeldine
2 player
B Lockrose
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Bacon
2 player
J Todd
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Bacon
2 player
M Clarke
Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
M Bacon
2 player
D Phillips
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
M Bacon
2 player
M Chu
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
M Bacon
2 player
J Gibson
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
M Bacon
2 player
D Foxcroft
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
M Bacon
2 player
L Carter
Weak Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
M Bacon
2 player
A Hazeldine
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M Bacon
2 player
M Bacon
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.06
1 player
M Bacon
2 player
L Johnson
No Correlation
-0.05
1 player
M Bacon
2 player
B Lockrose
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
L Johnson
2 player
J Todd
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
L Johnson
2 player
M Clarke
Positive Correlation
-0.16
1 player
L Johnson
2 player
D Phillips
No Correlation
-0.3
1 player
L Johnson
2 player
M Chu
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.42
1 player
L Johnson
2 player
J Gibson
Negative Correlation
-0.16
1 player
L Johnson
2 player
D Foxcroft
No Correlation
0
1 player
L Johnson
2 player
L Carter
No Correlation
-0.2
1 player
L Johnson
2 player
A Hazeldine
No Correlation
-0.06
1 player
L Johnson
2 player
M Bacon
No Correlation
1
1 player
L Johnson
2 player
L Johnson
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.11
1 player
L Johnson
2 player
B Lockrose
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
B Lockrose
2 player
J Todd
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
B Lockrose
2 player
M Clarke
Negative Correlation
-0.09
1 player
B Lockrose
2 player
D Phillips
No Correlation
0.09
1 player
B Lockrose
2 player
M Chu
No Correlation
0.43
1 player
B Lockrose
2 player
J Gibson
Positive Correlation
-0.2
1 player
B Lockrose
2 player
D Foxcroft
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
B Lockrose
2 player
L Carter
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
B Lockrose
2 player
A Hazeldine
Positive Correlation
-0.05
1 player
B Lockrose
2 player
M Bacon
No Correlation
-0.11
1 player
B Lockrose
2 player
L Johnson
No Correlation
1
1 player
B Lockrose
2 player
B Lockrose
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick J Todd and L Johnson together
Positive Correlation

Pick M Clarke and M Chu together
Positive Correlation

Pick M Clarke and A Hazeldine together
Positive Correlation

Pick J Todd and D Foxcroft together
Negative Correlation

Pick J Todd and B Lockrose together
Negative Correlation

Pick M Clarke and J Gibson together
Negative Correlation

Pick M Clarke and B Lockrose together
Negative Correlation

Pick J Gibson and A Hazeldine together
Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 D Phillips

BAT
Similar Perfomance
A Hazeldine 0.2
M Bacon 0.12
Opposite Perfomance
M Clarke -0.7
M Chu -0.45
D Foxcroft -0.33
L Johnson -0.16
B Lockrose -0.09

2 M Bacon

BOW
Similar Perfomance
J Todd 0.7
M Clarke 0.7
A Hazeldine 0.43
L Carter 0.33
M Chu 0.23
J Gibson 0.14
D Phillips 0.12
D Foxcroft 0.11
Opposite Perfomance
L Johnson -0.06
B Lockrose -0.05

3 M Chu

WK
Similar Perfomance
M Clarke 0.7
J Gibson 0.25
M Bacon 0.23
D Foxcroft 0.14
L Carter 0.14
B Lockrose 0.09
Opposite Perfomance
D Phillips -0.45
L Johnson -0.3

4 B Lockrose

BOW
Similar Perfomance
J Gibson 0.43
A Hazeldine 0.4
L Carter 0.14
M Chu 0.09
Opposite Perfomance
J Todd -0.7
M Clarke -0.7
D Foxcroft -0.2
L Johnson -0.11
D Phillips -0.09
M Bacon -0.05

5 D Foxcroft

AR
Similar Perfomance
M Chu 0.14
J Gibson 0.14
M Bacon 0.11
Opposite Perfomance
J Todd -0.7
M Clarke -0.7
L Carter -0.42
D Phillips -0.33
A Hazeldine -0.2
B Lockrose -0.2
L Johnson -0.16

More on PL Labs

AA vs OV

PerfectLineup © 2025. All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer - PerfectLineup is an educational tool providing detailed analysis of sports players based on their past performances. We are not associated with any gaming activity and do not host any kind of paid or free contests or pool games. Our focus is purely on data-driven solutions to enhance our users' knowledge.

Perfect Lineup is not affiliated in any way to and claims no association, in any capacity whatsoever, with the Residents of the states of SIKKIM, ASSAM, ODISHA, TELANGANA, NAGALAND, ANDHRA PRADESH and where otherwise prohibited by law are not eligible to access Perfect Lineup.

This platform is applicable for users 18+ Only