Upcoming
Fixtures
View All
AH-W 09 Feb 03:00 am OS-W

Lineup Out

Kennards Hire Community Oval
Hallyburton Johnstone Shield

Best Player Combinations For
AH-W vs OS-W

How it Works?

This guide is super useful for identifying player combinations that are likely to score big. Use the filters to identify the best player combinations according to specific match scenarios.

Player correlate positively

Both players generally perform similarly when picked together. They either score high together or score low together. Maximise FPts by picking players that correlate positively with top players.

Player correlate negatively

Both players generally perform in an opposite manner. If one player scores high, the other usually scores low. Avoid picking players that correlate negatively with top player

More on PL Labs

AH-W vs OS-W

Show Player Combinations on the basis of:

Best AH-W Player Combinations

Best AH-W Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
I Gaze WK AH-W
B Illing BOW AH-W
L Down BAT AH-W
S Shahri BAT AH-W
B Armstrong BAT AH-W
F Jonas BOW AH-W
A Hucker BOW AH-W
M Green BAT AH-W
C Pedersen BAT AH-W
J Penfold AR AH-W
P Catton BAT AH-W
I Gaze
B Illing
L Down
S Shahri
B Armstrong
F Jonas
A Hucker
M Green
C Pedersen
J Penfold
P Catton
1
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
I Gaze
Strong Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
B Illing
Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
L Down
Weak Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
S Shahri
Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
B Armstrong
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
F Jonas
Positive Correlation
0.29
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
A Hucker
Weak Positive Correlation
0.52
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
M Green
Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
C Pedersen
No Correlation
0.27
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
J Penfold
Weak Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
P Catton
No Correlation
0.47
1 player
B Illing
2 player
I Gaze
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
B Illing
2 player
B Illing
Strong Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
B Illing
2 player
L Down
Weak Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
B Illing
2 player
S Shahri
No Correlation
-0.2
1 player
B Illing
2 player
B Armstrong
No Correlation
0.18
1 player
B Illing
2 player
F Jonas
No Correlation
0.17
1 player
B Illing
2 player
A Hucker
No Correlation
0.17
1 player
B Illing
2 player
M Green
No Correlation
-0.28
1 player
B Illing
2 player
C Pedersen
Weak Negative Correlation
0.31
1 player
B Illing
2 player
J Penfold
Weak Positive Correlation
0.05
1 player
B Illing
2 player
P Catton
No Correlation
0.34
1 player
L Down
2 player
I Gaze
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
L Down
2 player
B Illing
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
L Down
2 player
L Down
Strong Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
L Down
2 player
S Shahri
No Correlation
0.18
1 player
L Down
2 player
B Armstrong
No Correlation
0.01
1 player
L Down
2 player
F Jonas
No Correlation
0.17
1 player
L Down
2 player
A Hucker
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
L Down
2 player
M Green
No Correlation
0.37
1 player
L Down
2 player
C Pedersen
Weak Positive Correlation
0.37
1 player
L Down
2 player
J Penfold
Weak Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
L Down
2 player
P Catton
Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
I Gaze
Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
B Illing
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
L Down
No Correlation
1
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
S Shahri
Strong Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
B Armstrong
Weak Positive Correlation
0.48
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
F Jonas
Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
A Hucker
Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
M Green
Positive Correlation
-0.04
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
C Pedersen
No Correlation
-0.23
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
J Penfold
Weak Negative Correlation
0.19
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
P Catton
No Correlation
0.07
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
I Gaze
No Correlation
-0.2
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
B Illing
No Correlation
0.18
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
L Down
No Correlation
0.26
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
S Shahri
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
B Armstrong
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.08
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
F Jonas
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
A Hucker
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.21
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
M Green
Weak Negative Correlation
0.47
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
C Pedersen
Positive Correlation
-0.04
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
J Penfold
No Correlation
0.19
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
P Catton
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
I Gaze
Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
B Illing
No Correlation
0.01
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
L Down
No Correlation
0.48
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
S Shahri
Positive Correlation
-0.08
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
B Armstrong
No Correlation
1
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
F Jonas
Strong Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
A Hucker
Weak Positive Correlation
0.41
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
M Green
Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
C Pedersen
No Correlation
0.32
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
J Penfold
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.07
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
P Catton
No Correlation
0.29
1 player
A Hucker
2 player
I Gaze
Weak Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
A Hucker
2 player
B Illing
No Correlation
0.17
1 player
A Hucker
2 player
L Down
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
A Hucker
2 player
S Shahri
Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
A Hucker
2 player
B Armstrong
Weak Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
A Hucker
2 player
F Jonas
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
A Hucker
2 player
A Hucker
Strong Positive Correlation
0.16
1 player
A Hucker
2 player
M Green
No Correlation
0.38
1 player
A Hucker
2 player
C Pedersen
Weak Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
A Hucker
2 player
J Penfold
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
A Hucker
2 player
P Catton
Weak Positive Correlation
0.52
1 player
M Green
2 player
I Gaze
Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
M Green
2 player
B Illing
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
M Green
2 player
L Down
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
M Green
2 player
S Shahri
Positive Correlation
-0.21
1 player
M Green
2 player
B Armstrong
Weak Negative Correlation
0.41
1 player
M Green
2 player
F Jonas
Positive Correlation
0.16
1 player
M Green
2 player
A Hucker
No Correlation
1
1 player
M Green
2 player
M Green
Strong Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
M Green
2 player
C Pedersen
Weak Positive Correlation
0.02
1 player
M Green
2 player
J Penfold
No Correlation
-0.07
1 player
M Green
2 player
P Catton
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
C Pedersen
2 player
I Gaze
No Correlation
-0.28
1 player
C Pedersen
2 player
B Illing
Weak Negative Correlation
0.37
1 player
C Pedersen
2 player
L Down
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.04
1 player
C Pedersen
2 player
S Shahri
No Correlation
0.47
1 player
C Pedersen
2 player
B Armstrong
Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
C Pedersen
2 player
F Jonas
No Correlation
0.38
1 player
C Pedersen
2 player
A Hucker
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
C Pedersen
2 player
M Green
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
C Pedersen
2 player
C Pedersen
Strong Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
C Pedersen
2 player
J Penfold
Weak Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
C Pedersen
2 player
P Catton
No Correlation
0.27
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
I Gaze
Weak Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
B Illing
Weak Positive Correlation
0.37
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
L Down
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
S Shahri
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.04
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
B Armstrong
No Correlation
0.32
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
F Jonas
Weak Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
A Hucker
No Correlation
0.02
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
M Green
No Correlation
0.34
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
C Pedersen
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
J Penfold
Strong Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
P Catton
Weak Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
P Catton
2 player
I Gaze
No Correlation
0.05
1 player
P Catton
2 player
B Illing
No Correlation
0.47
1 player
P Catton
2 player
L Down
Positive Correlation
0.19
1 player
P Catton
2 player
S Shahri
No Correlation
0.19
1 player
P Catton
2 player
B Armstrong
No Correlation
-0.07
1 player
P Catton
2 player
F Jonas
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
P Catton
2 player
A Hucker
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.07
1 player
P Catton
2 player
M Green
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
P Catton
2 player
C Pedersen
No Correlation
0.32
1 player
P Catton
2 player
J Penfold
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
P Catton
2 player
P Catton
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

No data found

High Performing Players

1 S Shahri

BAT
Similar Perfomance
F Jonas 0.48
I Gaze 0.47
A Hucker 0.42
M Green 0.42
B Armstrong 0.26
P Catton 0.19
L Down 0.11
B Illing 0.1
Opposite Perfomance
J Penfold -0.23
C Pedersen -0.04

2 M Green

BAT
Similar Perfomance
I Gaze 0.52
S Shahri 0.42
F Jonas 0.41
C Pedersen 0.2
B Illing 0.17
A Hucker 0.16
L Down 0.11
J Penfold 0.02
Opposite Perfomance
B Armstrong -0.21
P Catton -0.07

3 F Jonas

BOW
Similar Perfomance
I Gaze 0.5
S Shahri 0.48
M Green 0.41
A Hucker 0.39
J Penfold 0.32
B Illing 0.18
C Pedersen 0.14
L Down 0.01
Opposite Perfomance
B Armstrong -0.08
P Catton -0.07

4 A Hucker

BOW
Similar Perfomance
S Shahri 0.42
F Jonas 0.39
C Pedersen 0.38
B Armstrong 0.35
I Gaze 0.29
P Catton 0.25
B Illing 0.17
L Down 0.17
J Penfold 0.17
M Green 0.16

5 B Illing

BOW
Similar Perfomance
I Gaze 0.47
J Penfold 0.31
L Down 0.28
F Jonas 0.18
A Hucker 0.17
M Green 0.17
S Shahri 0.1
P Catton 0.05
Opposite Perfomance
C Pedersen -0.28
B Armstrong -0.2

Best OS-W Player Combinations

Best OS-W Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
B James WK OS-W
E Carson BOW OS-W
C Blakely BAT OS-W
H Jensen BOW OS-W
E Black BOW OS-W
F Leydon-Davis AR OS-W
O Gain BAT OS-W
M Loe BOW OS-W
P Inglis WK OS-W
S Bates AR OS-W
C Deerness BOW OS-W
B James
E Carson
C Blakely
H Jensen
E Black
F Leydon-Davis
O Gain
M Loe
P Inglis
S Bates
C Deerness
1
1 player
B James
2 player
B James
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
B James
2 player
E Carson
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
B James
2 player
C Blakely
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.1
1 player
B James
2 player
H Jensen
No Correlation
0.19
1 player
B James
2 player
E Black
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
B James
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
B James
2 player
O Gain
Weak Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
B James
2 player
M Loe
Weak Positive Correlation
0.02
1 player
B James
2 player
P Inglis
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
B James
2 player
S Bates
Weak Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
B James
2 player
C Deerness
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
E Carson
2 player
B James
No Correlation
1
1 player
E Carson
2 player
E Carson
Strong Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
E Carson
2 player
C Blakely
Weak Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
E Carson
2 player
H Jensen
No Correlation
0.38
1 player
E Carson
2 player
E Black
Weak Positive Correlation
0.44
1 player
E Carson
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
E Carson
2 player
O Gain
No Correlation
0.18
1 player
E Carson
2 player
M Loe
No Correlation
0.29
1 player
E Carson
2 player
P Inglis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
E Carson
2 player
S Bates
No Correlation
0.1
1 player
E Carson
2 player
C Deerness
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
B James
Weak Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
E Carson
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
C Blakely
Strong Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
H Jensen
No Correlation
0.29
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
E Black
Weak Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.44
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
O Gain
Positive Correlation
0.45
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
M Loe
Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
P Inglis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.29
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
S Bates
Weak Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
C Deerness
No Correlation
-0.1
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
B James
No Correlation
0.07
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
E Carson
No Correlation
0.09
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
C Blakely
No Correlation
1
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
H Jensen
Strong Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
E Black
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.29
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
O Gain
Weak Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
M Loe
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
P Inglis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
S Bates
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
C Deerness
Positive Correlation
0.19
1 player
E Black
2 player
B James
No Correlation
0.38
1 player
E Black
2 player
E Carson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.29
1 player
E Black
2 player
C Blakely
Weak Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
E Black
2 player
H Jensen
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
E Black
2 player
E Black
Strong Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
E Black
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
E Black
2 player
O Gain
Weak Positive Correlation
0.48
1 player
E Black
2 player
M Loe
Positive Correlation
0.29
1 player
E Black
2 player
P Inglis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
E Black
2 player
S Bates
Weak Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
E Black
2 player
C Deerness
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
B James
Weak Positive Correlation
0.44
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
E Carson
Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
C Blakely
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
H Jensen
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
E Black
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
Strong Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
O Gain
Weak Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
M Loe
Weak Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
P Inglis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
S Bates
Weak Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
C Deerness
Weak Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
O Gain
2 player
B James
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
O Gain
2 player
E Carson
No Correlation
0.44
1 player
O Gain
2 player
C Blakely
Positive Correlation
0.29
1 player
O Gain
2 player
H Jensen
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
O Gain
2 player
E Black
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
O Gain
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
O Gain
2 player
O Gain
Strong Positive Correlation
0.48
1 player
O Gain
2 player
M Loe
Positive Correlation
0.41
1 player
O Gain
2 player
P Inglis
Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
O Gain
2 player
S Bates
Weak Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
O Gain
2 player
C Deerness
No Correlation
0.38
1 player
M Loe
2 player
B James
Weak Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
M Loe
2 player
E Carson
No Correlation
0.45
1 player
M Loe
2 player
C Blakely
Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
M Loe
2 player
H Jensen
No Correlation
0.48
1 player
M Loe
2 player
E Black
Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
M Loe
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.48
1 player
M Loe
2 player
O Gain
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M Loe
2 player
M Loe
Strong Positive Correlation
0.03
1 player
M Loe
2 player
P Inglis
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
M Loe
2 player
S Bates
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
M Loe
2 player
C Deerness
Weak Positive Correlation
0.02
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
B James
No Correlation
0.29
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
E Carson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
C Blakely
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
H Jensen
Weak Positive Correlation
0.29
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
E Black
Weak Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.41
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
O Gain
Positive Correlation
0.03
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
M Loe
No Correlation
1
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
P Inglis
Strong Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
S Bates
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
C Deerness
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
S Bates
2 player
B James
Weak Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
S Bates
2 player
E Carson
No Correlation
0.29
1 player
S Bates
2 player
C Blakely
Weak Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
S Bates
2 player
H Jensen
No Correlation
0.26
1 player
S Bates
2 player
E Black
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
S Bates
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
S Bates
2 player
O Gain
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
S Bates
2 player
M Loe
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
S Bates
2 player
P Inglis
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
S Bates
2 player
S Bates
Strong Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
S Bates
2 player
C Deerness
Weak Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
C Deerness
2 player
B James
Weak Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
C Deerness
2 player
E Carson
No Correlation
0.17
1 player
C Deerness
2 player
C Blakely
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
C Deerness
2 player
H Jensen
Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
C Deerness
2 player
E Black
Weak Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
C Deerness
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
C Deerness
2 player
O Gain
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
C Deerness
2 player
M Loe
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
C Deerness
2 player
P Inglis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
C Deerness
2 player
S Bates
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
C Deerness
2 player
C Deerness
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick H Jensen and C Deerness together
Positive Correlation

High Performing Players

1 E Black

BOW
Similar Perfomance
M Loe 0.48
E Carson 0.38
O Gain 0.33
C Blakely 0.29
P Inglis 0.29
S Bates 0.26
F Leydon-Davis 0.25
H Jensen 0.22
C Deerness 0.21
B James 0.19

2 F Leydon-Davis

AR
Similar Perfomance
E Carson 0.44
M Loe 0.38
C Deerness 0.38
C Blakely 0.32
H Jensen 0.28
E Black 0.25
S Bates 0.25
P Inglis 0.24
B James 0.23
O Gain 0.2

3 E Carson

BOW
Similar Perfomance
F Leydon-Davis 0.44
E Black 0.38
C Blakely 0.31
P Inglis 0.29
M Loe 0.18
O Gain 0.14
C Deerness 0.1
H Jensen 0.07
S Bates 0.07

4 P Inglis

WK
Similar Perfomance
O Gain 0.41
E Carson 0.29
E Black 0.29
C Deerness 0.28
H Jensen 0.25
F Leydon-Davis 0.24
S Bates 0.23
C Blakely 0.21
M Loe 0.03
B James 0.02

5 C Blakely

BAT
Similar Perfomance
M Loe 0.45
O Gain 0.44
B James 0.35
F Leydon-Davis 0.32
E Carson 0.31
E Black 0.29
S Bates 0.29
P Inglis 0.21
C Deerness 0.17
H Jensen 0.09

Best AH-W Player Combinations

Best AH-W Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
I Gaze WK AH-W
B Illing BOW AH-W
L Down BAT AH-W
S Shahri BAT AH-W
B Armstrong BAT AH-W
F Jonas BOW AH-W
A Hucker BOW AH-W
M Green BAT AH-W
C Pedersen BAT AH-W
J Penfold AR AH-W
P Catton BAT AH-W
I Gaze
B Illing
L Down
S Shahri
B Armstrong
F Jonas
A Hucker
M Green
C Pedersen
J Penfold
P Catton
1
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
I Gaze
Strong Positive Correlation
0.85
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
B Illing
Strong Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
L Down
No Correlation
-0.29
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
S Shahri
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.45
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
B Armstrong
Negative Correlation
0.17
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
F Jonas
No Correlation
-0.08
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
A Hucker
No Correlation
-0.08
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
M Green
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
C Pedersen
Weak Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
J Penfold
No Correlation
-0.38
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
P Catton
Weak Negative Correlation
0.85
1 player
B Illing
2 player
I Gaze
Strong Positive Correlation
1
1 player
B Illing
2 player
B Illing
Strong Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
B Illing
2 player
L Down
No Correlation
-0.29
1 player
B Illing
2 player
S Shahri
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.67
1 player
B Illing
2 player
B Armstrong
Negative Correlation
0.27
1 player
B Illing
2 player
F Jonas
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
B Illing
2 player
A Hucker
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
B Illing
2 player
M Green
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
B Illing
2 player
C Pedersen
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
B Illing
2 player
J Penfold
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.08
1 player
B Illing
2 player
P Catton
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
L Down
2 player
I Gaze
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
L Down
2 player
B Illing
No Correlation
1
1 player
L Down
2 player
L Down
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
L Down
2 player
S Shahri
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.6
1 player
L Down
2 player
B Armstrong
Negative Correlation
-0.17
1 player
L Down
2 player
F Jonas
No Correlation
-0.67
1 player
L Down
2 player
A Hucker
Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
L Down
2 player
M Green
No Correlation
-0.23
1 player
L Down
2 player
C Pedersen
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
L Down
2 player
J Penfold
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
L Down
2 player
P Catton
Positive Correlation
-0.29
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
I Gaze
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.29
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
B Illing
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
L Down
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
S Shahri
Strong Positive Correlation
0.05
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
B Armstrong
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
F Jonas
Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
A Hucker
Weak Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
M Green
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
C Pedersen
No Correlation
-0.44
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
J Penfold
Negative Correlation
-0.11
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
P Catton
No Correlation
-0.45
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
I Gaze
Negative Correlation
-0.67
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
B Illing
Negative Correlation
-0.6
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
L Down
Negative Correlation
0.05
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
S Shahri
No Correlation
1
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
B Armstrong
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.38
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
F Jonas
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.22
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
A Hucker
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.6
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
M Green
Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
C Pedersen
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.2
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
J Penfold
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
P Catton
Weak Negative Correlation
0.17
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
I Gaze
No Correlation
0.27
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
B Illing
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.17
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
L Down
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
S Shahri
Positive Correlation
-0.38
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
B Armstrong
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
F Jonas
Strong Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
A Hucker
Weak Positive Correlation
0.29
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
M Green
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
C Pedersen
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
J Penfold
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.6
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
P Catton
Negative Correlation
-0.08
1 player
A Hucker
2 player
I Gaze
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
A Hucker
2 player
B Illing
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.67
1 player
A Hucker
2 player
L Down
Negative Correlation
0.2
1 player
A Hucker
2 player
S Shahri
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.22
1 player
A Hucker
2 player
B Armstrong
Weak Negative Correlation
0.27
1 player
A Hucker
2 player
F Jonas
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
A Hucker
2 player
A Hucker
Strong Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
A Hucker
2 player
M Green
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
A Hucker
2 player
C Pedersen
No Correlation
-0.2
1 player
A Hucker
2 player
J Penfold
No Correlation
-0.38
1 player
A Hucker
2 player
P Catton
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.08
1 player
M Green
2 player
I Gaze
No Correlation
0
1 player
M Green
2 player
B Illing
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
M Green
2 player
L Down
No Correlation
0.38
1 player
M Green
2 player
S Shahri
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.6
1 player
M Green
2 player
B Armstrong
Negative Correlation
0.29
1 player
M Green
2 player
F Jonas
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
M Green
2 player
A Hucker
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M Green
2 player
M Green
Strong Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
M Green
2 player
C Pedersen
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.08
1 player
M Green
2 player
J Penfold
No Correlation
-0.09
1 player
M Green
2 player
P Catton
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
C Pedersen
2 player
I Gaze
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
C Pedersen
2 player
B Illing
No Correlation
-0.23
1 player
C Pedersen
2 player
L Down
Weak Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
C Pedersen
2 player
S Shahri
No Correlation
-0.23
1 player
C Pedersen
2 player
B Armstrong
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
C Pedersen
2 player
F Jonas
No Correlation
0
1 player
C Pedersen
2 player
A Hucker
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
C Pedersen
2 player
M Green
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
C Pedersen
2 player
C Pedersen
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
C Pedersen
2 player
J Penfold
No Correlation
-0.42
1 player
C Pedersen
2 player
P Catton
Negative Correlation
0.07
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
I Gaze
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
B Illing
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
L Down
No Correlation
-0.44
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
S Shahri
Negative Correlation
-0.2
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
B Armstrong
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
F Jonas
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.2
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
A Hucker
No Correlation
-0.08
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
M Green
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
C Pedersen
No Correlation
1
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
J Penfold
Strong Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
P Catton
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.38
1 player
P Catton
2 player
I Gaze
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.08
1 player
P Catton
2 player
B Illing
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
P Catton
2 player
L Down
Positive Correlation
-0.11
1 player
P Catton
2 player
S Shahri
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
P Catton
2 player
B Armstrong
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.6
1 player
P Catton
2 player
F Jonas
Negative Correlation
-0.38
1 player
P Catton
2 player
A Hucker
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.09
1 player
P Catton
2 player
M Green
No Correlation
-0.42
1 player
P Catton
2 player
C Pedersen
Negative Correlation
0.38
1 player
P Catton
2 player
J Penfold
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
P Catton
2 player
P Catton
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick I Gaze and B Illing together
Strong Positive Correlation

Pick L Down and P Catton together
Positive Correlation

Pick B Illing and B Armstrong together
Negative Correlation

Pick L Down and B Armstrong together
Negative Correlation

Pick L Down and A Hucker together
Negative Correlation

Pick B Armstrong and M Green together
Negative Correlation

Pick F Jonas and P Catton together
Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 S Shahri

BAT
Similar Perfomance
F Jonas 0.5
M Green 0.38
A Hucker 0.2
C Pedersen 0.14
B Armstrong 0.05
Opposite Perfomance
J Penfold -0.44
L Down -0.33
I Gaze -0.29
B Illing -0.29
P Catton -0.11

2 A Hucker

BOW
Similar Perfomance
M Green 0.33
F Jonas 0.27
B Illing 0.23
S Shahri 0.2
Opposite Perfomance
L Down -0.67
P Catton -0.38
B Armstrong -0.22
J Penfold -0.2
I Gaze -0.08

3 F Jonas

BOW
Similar Perfomance
S Shahri 0.5
M Green 0.29
B Illing 0.27
A Hucker 0.27
J Penfold 0.23
I Gaze 0.17
Opposite Perfomance
P Catton -0.6
B Armstrong -0.38
L Down -0.17
C Pedersen -0.14

4 I Gaze

WK
Similar Perfomance
B Illing 0.85
C Pedersen 0.33
F Jonas 0.17
L Down 0.14
J Penfold 0.07
Opposite Perfomance
B Armstrong -0.45
P Catton -0.38
S Shahri -0.29
A Hucker -0.08
M Green -0.08

5 B Illing

BOW
Similar Perfomance
I Gaze 0.85
F Jonas 0.27
A Hucker 0.23
J Penfold 0.23
L Down 0.14
Opposite Perfomance
B Armstrong -0.67
S Shahri -0.29
C Pedersen -0.14
P Catton -0.08

Best OS-W Player Combinations

Best OS-W Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
B James WK OS-W
E Carson BOW OS-W
C Blakely BAT OS-W
H Jensen BOW OS-W
E Black BOW OS-W
F Leydon-Davis AR OS-W
O Gain BAT OS-W
M Loe BOW OS-W
P Inglis WK OS-W
S Bates AR OS-W
C Deerness BOW OS-W
B James
E Carson
C Blakely
H Jensen
E Black
F Leydon-Davis
O Gain
M Loe
P Inglis
S Bates
C Deerness
1
1 player
B James
2 player
B James
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.58
1 player
B James
2 player
E Carson
Negative Correlation
-0.04
1 player
B James
2 player
C Blakely
No Correlation
-0.4
1 player
B James
2 player
H Jensen
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.04
1 player
B James
2 player
E Black
No Correlation
0.05
1 player
B James
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
No Correlation
-0.09
1 player
B James
2 player
O Gain
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
B James
2 player
M Loe
No Correlation
-0.15
1 player
B James
2 player
P Inglis
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
B James
2 player
S Bates
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
B James
2 player
C Deerness
No Correlation
-0.58
1 player
E Carson
2 player
B James
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
E Carson
2 player
E Carson
Strong Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
E Carson
2 player
C Blakely
No Correlation
-0.2
1 player
E Carson
2 player
H Jensen
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
E Carson
2 player
E Black
Weak Positive Correlation
0.29
1 player
E Carson
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.38
1 player
E Carson
2 player
O Gain
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.08
1 player
E Carson
2 player
M Loe
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
E Carson
2 player
P Inglis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
E Carson
2 player
S Bates
No Correlation
-0.25
1 player
E Carson
2 player
C Deerness
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.04
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
B James
No Correlation
0.1
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
E Carson
No Correlation
1
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
C Blakely
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
H Jensen
No Correlation
0.07
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
E Black
No Correlation
0.13
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
No Correlation
-0.09
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
O Gain
No Correlation
0.26
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
M Loe
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.04
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
P Inglis
No Correlation
0
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
S Bates
No Correlation
-0.45
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
C Deerness
Negative Correlation
-0.4
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
B James
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.2
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
E Carson
No Correlation
0
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
C Blakely
No Correlation
1
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
H Jensen
Strong Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
E Black
No Correlation
0
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
O Gain
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
M Loe
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
P Inglis
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
S Bates
No Correlation
0
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
C Deerness
No Correlation
-0.04
1 player
E Black
2 player
B James
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
E Black
2 player
E Carson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
E Black
2 player
C Blakely
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
E Black
2 player
H Jensen
No Correlation
1
1 player
E Black
2 player
E Black
Strong Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
E Black
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
No Correlation
-0.09
1 player
E Black
2 player
O Gain
No Correlation
0.44
1 player
E Black
2 player
M Loe
Positive Correlation
0.48
1 player
E Black
2 player
P Inglis
Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
E Black
2 player
S Bates
Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
E Black
2 player
C Deerness
No Correlation
0.05
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
B James
No Correlation
0.29
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
E Carson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
C Blakely
No Correlation
0
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
H Jensen
No Correlation
0.18
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
E Black
No Correlation
1
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.2
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
O Gain
No Correlation
-0.08
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
M Loe
No Correlation
0.05
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
P Inglis
No Correlation
0
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
S Bates
No Correlation
0.27
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
C Deerness
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.09
1 player
O Gain
2 player
B James
No Correlation
-0.38
1 player
O Gain
2 player
E Carson
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.09
1 player
O Gain
2 player
C Blakely
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
O Gain
2 player
H Jensen
No Correlation
-0.09
1 player
O Gain
2 player
E Black
No Correlation
-0.2
1 player
O Gain
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
No Correlation
1
1 player
O Gain
2 player
O Gain
Strong Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
O Gain
2 player
M Loe
Positive Correlation
-0.22
1 player
O Gain
2 player
P Inglis
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.25
1 player
O Gain
2 player
S Bates
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.2
1 player
O Gain
2 player
C Deerness
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
M Loe
2 player
B James
No Correlation
-0.08
1 player
M Loe
2 player
E Carson
No Correlation
0.26
1 player
M Loe
2 player
C Blakely
Weak Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
M Loe
2 player
H Jensen
No Correlation
0.44
1 player
M Loe
2 player
E Black
Positive Correlation
-0.08
1 player
M Loe
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
No Correlation
0.43
1 player
M Loe
2 player
O Gain
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M Loe
2 player
M Loe
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.11
1 player
M Loe
2 player
P Inglis
No Correlation
0.27
1 player
M Loe
2 player
S Bates
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
M Loe
2 player
C Deerness
No Correlation
-0.15
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
B James
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
E Carson
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.04
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
C Blakely
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
H Jensen
Positive Correlation
0.48
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
E Black
Positive Correlation
0.05
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
No Correlation
-0.22
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
O Gain
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.11
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
M Loe
No Correlation
1
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
P Inglis
Strong Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
S Bates
No Correlation
0.09
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
C Deerness
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
S Bates
2 player
B James
Weak Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
S Bates
2 player
E Carson
No Correlation
0
1 player
S Bates
2 player
C Blakely
No Correlation
0
1 player
S Bates
2 player
H Jensen
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
S Bates
2 player
E Black
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
S Bates
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
No Correlation
-0.25
1 player
S Bates
2 player
O Gain
Weak Negative Correlation
0.27
1 player
S Bates
2 player
M Loe
Weak Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
S Bates
2 player
P Inglis
No Correlation
1
1 player
S Bates
2 player
S Bates
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
S Bates
2 player
C Deerness
No Correlation
0
1 player
C Deerness
2 player
B James
No Correlation
-0.25
1 player
C Deerness
2 player
E Carson
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.45
1 player
C Deerness
2 player
C Blakely
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
C Deerness
2 player
H Jensen
No Correlation
0.09
1 player
C Deerness
2 player
E Black
No Correlation
0.27
1 player
C Deerness
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.2
1 player
C Deerness
2 player
O Gain
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
C Deerness
2 player
M Loe
No Correlation
0.09
1 player
C Deerness
2 player
P Inglis
No Correlation
0
1 player
C Deerness
2 player
S Bates
No Correlation
1
1 player
C Deerness
2 player
C Deerness
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

No data found

High Performing Players

1 C Blakely

BAT
Similar Perfomance
M Loe 0.26
F Leydon-Davis 0.13
E Carson 0.1
E Black 0.07
Opposite Perfomance
C Deerness -0.45
O Gain -0.09
B James -0.04
P Inglis -0.04

2 P Inglis

WK
Similar Perfomance
E Black 0.48
H Jensen 0.4
E Carson 0.33
S Bates 0.17
C Deerness 0.09
F Leydon-Davis 0.05
Opposite Perfomance
O Gain -0.22
B James -0.15
M Loe -0.11
C Blakely -0.04

3 E Black

BOW
Similar Perfomance
S Bates 0.5
P Inglis 0.48
M Loe 0.44
E Carson 0.2
F Leydon-Davis 0.18
H Jensen 0.11
C Deerness 0.09
C Blakely 0.07
Opposite Perfomance
O Gain -0.09
B James -0.04

4 F Leydon-Davis

AR
Similar Perfomance
E Carson 0.29
C Deerness 0.27
E Black 0.18
C Blakely 0.13
B James 0.05
P Inglis 0.05
Opposite Perfomance
O Gain -0.2
M Loe -0.08

5 E Carson

BOW
Similar Perfomance
P Inglis 0.33
F Leydon-Davis 0.29
E Black 0.2
S Bates 0.17
C Blakely 0.1
Opposite Perfomance
B James -0.58
O Gain -0.38
C Deerness -0.25
H Jensen -0.2
M Loe -0.08

More on PL Labs

AH-W vs OS-W

PerfectLineup © 2025. All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer - PerfectLineup is an educational tool providing detailed analysis of sports players based on their past performances. We are not associated with any gaming activity and do not host any kind of paid or free contests or pool games. Our focus is purely on data-driven solutions to enhance our users' knowledge.

Perfect Lineup is not affiliated in any way to and claims no association, in any capacity whatsoever, with the Residents of the states of SIKKIM, ASSAM, ODISHA, TELANGANA, NAGALAND, ANDHRA PRADESH and where otherwise prohibited by law are not eligible to access Perfect Lineup.

This platform is applicable for users 18+ Only