AM-W 07 Feb 04:30 am WA-W

Lineup Out

Phillip Oval
Womens National Cricket League

Best Player Combinations For
AM-W vs WA-W

How it Works?

This guide is super useful for identifying player combinations that are likely to score big. Use the filters to identify the best player combinations according to specific match scenarios.

Player correlate positively

Both players generally perform similarly when picked together. They either score high together or score low together. Maximise FPts by picking players that correlate positively with top players.

Player correlate negatively

Both players generally perform in an opposite manner. If one player scores high, the other usually scores low. Avoid picking players that correlate negatively with top player

Show Player Combinations on the basis of:

Best AM-W Player Combinations

Best AM-W Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad
S Mehta BAT AM-W
G Dignam AR AM-W
C Moscript BOW AM-W
K Mack BAT AM-W
H Ferling BOW AM-W
O Porter BAT AM-W
Z Cooke BOW AM-W
G Sutcliffe BOW AM-W
A Mushangwe BOW AM-W
G Lyons WK AM-W
A Wikman BAT AM-W
S Mehta
G Dignam
C Moscript
K Mack
H Ferling
O Porter
Z Cooke
G Sutcliffe
A Mushangwe
G Lyons
A Wikman
1
1 player
S Mehta
2 player
S Mehta
Strong Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
S Mehta
2 player
G Dignam
Weak Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
S Mehta
2 player
C Moscript
Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
S Mehta
2 player
K Mack
No Correlation
-0.03
1 player
S Mehta
2 player
H Ferling
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
S Mehta
2 player
O Porter
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.09
1 player
S Mehta
2 player
Z Cooke
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
S Mehta
2 player
G Sutcliffe
Positive Correlation
0.01
1 player
S Mehta
2 player
A Mushangwe
No Correlation
0.62
1 player
S Mehta
2 player
G Lyons
Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
S Mehta
2 player
A Wikman
No Correlation
0.27
1 player
G Dignam
2 player
S Mehta
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
G Dignam
2 player
G Dignam
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
G Dignam
2 player
C Moscript
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
G Dignam
2 player
K Mack
Weak Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
G Dignam
2 player
H Ferling
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.07
1 player
G Dignam
2 player
O Porter
No Correlation
0.32
1 player
G Dignam
2 player
Z Cooke
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
G Dignam
2 player
G Sutcliffe
Weak Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
G Dignam
2 player
A Mushangwe
Weak Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
G Dignam
2 player
G Lyons
No Correlation
0.18
1 player
G Dignam
2 player
A Wikman
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
C Moscript
2 player
S Mehta
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
C Moscript
2 player
G Dignam
No Correlation
1
1 player
C Moscript
2 player
C Moscript
Strong Positive Correlation
1
1 player
C Moscript
2 player
K Mack
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.55
1 player
C Moscript
2 player
H Ferling
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
C Moscript
2 player
O Porter
Positive Correlation
-0.4
1 player
C Moscript
2 player
Z Cooke
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
C Moscript
2 player
G Sutcliffe
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
C Moscript
2 player
A Mushangwe
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
C Moscript
2 player
G Lyons
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
C Moscript
2 player
A Wikman
Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
K Mack
2 player
S Mehta
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
K Mack
2 player
G Dignam
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
K Mack
2 player
C Moscript
Strong Positive Correlation
1
1 player
K Mack
2 player
K Mack
Strong Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
K Mack
2 player
H Ferling
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
K Mack
2 player
O Porter
Weak Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
K Mack
2 player
Z Cooke
Weak Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
K Mack
2 player
G Sutcliffe
Weak Positive Correlation
0.49
1 player
K Mack
2 player
A Mushangwe
Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
K Mack
2 player
G Lyons
Weak Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
K Mack
2 player
A Wikman
No Correlation
-0.03
1 player
H Ferling
2 player
S Mehta
No Correlation
0.39
1 player
H Ferling
2 player
G Dignam
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.55
1 player
H Ferling
2 player
C Moscript
Negative Correlation
0.15
1 player
H Ferling
2 player
K Mack
No Correlation
1
1 player
H Ferling
2 player
H Ferling
Strong Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
H Ferling
2 player
O Porter
Positive Correlation
0.49
1 player
H Ferling
2 player
Z Cooke
Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
H Ferling
2 player
G Sutcliffe
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
H Ferling
2 player
A Mushangwe
Weak Positive Correlation
0.41
1 player
H Ferling
2 player
G Lyons
Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
H Ferling
2 player
A Wikman
Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
O Porter
2 player
S Mehta
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.07
1 player
O Porter
2 player
G Dignam
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
O Porter
2 player
C Moscript
Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
O Porter
2 player
K Mack
Weak Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
O Porter
2 player
H Ferling
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
O Porter
2 player
O Porter
Strong Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
O Porter
2 player
Z Cooke
Weak Positive Correlation
0.19
1 player
O Porter
2 player
G Sutcliffe
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
O Porter
2 player
A Mushangwe
Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
O Porter
2 player
G Lyons
Weak Positive Correlation
0.48
1 player
O Porter
2 player
A Wikman
Positive Correlation
-0.09
1 player
Z Cooke
2 player
S Mehta
No Correlation
0.32
1 player
Z Cooke
2 player
G Dignam
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.4
1 player
Z Cooke
2 player
C Moscript
Weak Negative Correlation
0.24
1 player
Z Cooke
2 player
K Mack
Weak Positive Correlation
0.49
1 player
Z Cooke
2 player
H Ferling
Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
Z Cooke
2 player
O Porter
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
Z Cooke
2 player
Z Cooke
Strong Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
Z Cooke
2 player
G Sutcliffe
Weak Positive Correlation
0.53
1 player
Z Cooke
2 player
A Mushangwe
Positive Correlation
0.06
1 player
Z Cooke
2 player
G Lyons
No Correlation
0.26
1 player
Z Cooke
2 player
A Wikman
Weak Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
G Sutcliffe
2 player
S Mehta
Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
G Sutcliffe
2 player
G Dignam
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
G Sutcliffe
2 player
C Moscript
No Correlation
0.31
1 player
G Sutcliffe
2 player
K Mack
Weak Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
G Sutcliffe
2 player
H Ferling
Weak Positive Correlation
0.19
1 player
G Sutcliffe
2 player
O Porter
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
G Sutcliffe
2 player
Z Cooke
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
G Sutcliffe
2 player
G Sutcliffe
Strong Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
G Sutcliffe
2 player
A Mushangwe
No Correlation
0.44
1 player
G Sutcliffe
2 player
G Lyons
Positive Correlation
-0.01
1 player
G Sutcliffe
2 player
A Wikman
No Correlation
0.01
1 player
A Mushangwe
2 player
S Mehta
No Correlation
0.24
1 player
A Mushangwe
2 player
G Dignam
Weak Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
A Mushangwe
2 player
C Moscript
Positive Correlation
0.49
1 player
A Mushangwe
2 player
K Mack
Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
A Mushangwe
2 player
H Ferling
Weak Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
A Mushangwe
2 player
O Porter
Positive Correlation
0.53
1 player
A Mushangwe
2 player
Z Cooke
Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
A Mushangwe
2 player
G Sutcliffe
No Correlation
1
1 player
A Mushangwe
2 player
A Mushangwe
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.09
1 player
A Mushangwe
2 player
G Lyons
No Correlation
0.39
1 player
A Mushangwe
2 player
A Wikman
Weak Positive Correlation
0.62
1 player
G Lyons
2 player
S Mehta
Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
G Lyons
2 player
G Dignam
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
G Lyons
2 player
C Moscript
Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
G Lyons
2 player
K Mack
Weak Positive Correlation
0.41
1 player
G Lyons
2 player
H Ferling
Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
G Lyons
2 player
O Porter
Weak Positive Correlation
0.06
1 player
G Lyons
2 player
Z Cooke
No Correlation
0.44
1 player
G Lyons
2 player
G Sutcliffe
Positive Correlation
-0.09
1 player
G Lyons
2 player
A Mushangwe
No Correlation
1
1 player
G Lyons
2 player
G Lyons
Strong Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
G Lyons
2 player
A Wikman
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
A Wikman
2 player
S Mehta
No Correlation
0.18
1 player
A Wikman
2 player
G Dignam
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
A Wikman
2 player
C Moscript
Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
A Wikman
2 player
K Mack
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
A Wikman
2 player
H Ferling
Positive Correlation
0.48
1 player
A Wikman
2 player
O Porter
Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
A Wikman
2 player
Z Cooke
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.01
1 player
A Wikman
2 player
G Sutcliffe
No Correlation
0.39
1 player
A Wikman
2 player
A Mushangwe
Weak Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
A Wikman
2 player
G Lyons
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
A Wikman
2 player
A Wikman
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick S Mehta and C Moscript together
Positive Correlation

Pick S Mehta and G Lyons together
Positive Correlation

Pick C Moscript and K Mack together
Strong Positive Correlation

Pick C Moscript and O Porter together
Positive Correlation

Pick C Moscript and A Mushangwe together
Positive Correlation

Pick C Moscript and G Lyons together
Positive Correlation

Pick C Moscript and A Wikman together
Positive Correlation

High Performing Players

1 K Mack

BAT
Similar Perfomance
C Moscript 1
A Mushangwe 0.49
G Dignam 0.33
G Lyons 0.32
G Sutcliffe 0.31
Z Cooke 0.24
O Porter 0.23
H Ferling 0.15
S Mehta 0.11
A Wikman 0.11

2 Z Cooke

BOW
Similar Perfomance
A Mushangwe 0.53
H Ferling 0.49
O Porter 0.39
G Sutcliffe 0.35
G Dignam 0.32
A Wikman 0.26
K Mack 0.24
G Lyons 0.06
Opposite Perfomance
C Moscript -0.4
S Mehta -0.09

3 H Ferling

BOW
Similar Perfomance
Z Cooke 0.49
O Porter 0.43
G Lyons 0.41
A Wikman 0.4
G Dignam 0.39
G Sutcliffe 0.21
A Mushangwe 0.2
K Mack 0.15
Opposite Perfomance
C Moscript -0.55
S Mehta -0.03

4 G Dignam

AR
Similar Perfomance
H Ferling 0.39
K Mack 0.33
Z Cooke 0.32
G Sutcliffe 0.28
S Mehta 0.27
A Mushangwe 0.24
A Wikman 0.18
G Lyons 0.15
Opposite Perfomance
O Porter -0.07

5 G Sutcliffe

BOW
Similar Perfomance
G Lyons 0.44
S Mehta 0.42
Z Cooke 0.35
K Mack 0.31
G Dignam 0.28
H Ferling 0.21
O Porter 0.19
A Mushangwe 0.13
Opposite Perfomance
A Wikman -0.01

Best WA-W Player Combinations

Best WA-W Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad
R Mcgrath BAT WA-W
S Manolini BOW WA-W
M Carmichael BAT WA-W
C Piparo BAT WA-W
M Hinkley BAT WA-W
M Darke WK WA-W
L Mills BOW WA-W
A Edgar AR WA-W
E Arlott BOW WA-W
Z Britcliffe BOW WA-W
C Bekker BOW WA-W
R Mcgrath
S Manolini
M Carmichael
C Piparo
M Hinkley
M Darke
L Mills
A Edgar
E Arlott
Z Britcliffe
C Bekker
1
1 player
R Mcgrath
2 player
R Mcgrath
Strong Positive Correlation
0.8
1 player
R Mcgrath
2 player
S Manolini
Strong Positive Correlation
0.52
1 player
R Mcgrath
2 player
M Carmichael
Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
R Mcgrath
2 player
C Piparo
Weak Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
R Mcgrath
2 player
M Hinkley
No Correlation
-0.12
1 player
R Mcgrath
2 player
M Darke
No Correlation
0.38
1 player
R Mcgrath
2 player
L Mills
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.28
1 player
R Mcgrath
2 player
A Edgar
Weak Negative Correlation
0.18
1 player
R Mcgrath
2 player
E Arlott
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
R Mcgrath
2 player
Z Britcliffe
Weak Positive Correlation
0.8
1 player
R Mcgrath
2 player
C Bekker
Strong Positive Correlation
0.8
1 player
S Manolini
2 player
R Mcgrath
Strong Positive Correlation
1
1 player
S Manolini
2 player
S Manolini
Strong Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
S Manolini
2 player
M Carmichael
Weak Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
S Manolini
2 player
C Piparo
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.13
1 player
S Manolini
2 player
M Hinkley
No Correlation
-0.07
1 player
S Manolini
2 player
M Darke
No Correlation
0.07
1 player
S Manolini
2 player
L Mills
No Correlation
-0.24
1 player
S Manolini
2 player
A Edgar
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.5
1 player
S Manolini
2 player
E Arlott
Negative Correlation
-0.1
1 player
S Manolini
2 player
Z Britcliffe
No Correlation
0.76
1 player
S Manolini
2 player
C Bekker
Positive Correlation
0.52
1 player
M Carmichael
2 player
R Mcgrath
Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
M Carmichael
2 player
S Manolini
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M Carmichael
2 player
M Carmichael
Strong Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
M Carmichael
2 player
C Piparo
Weak Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
M Carmichael
2 player
M Hinkley
Weak Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
M Carmichael
2 player
M Darke
No Correlation
0.13
1 player
M Carmichael
2 player
L Mills
No Correlation
-0.11
1 player
M Carmichael
2 player
A Edgar
No Correlation
0.48
1 player
M Carmichael
2 player
E Arlott
Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
M Carmichael
2 player
Z Britcliffe
Weak Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
M Carmichael
2 player
C Bekker
Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
C Piparo
2 player
R Mcgrath
Weak Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
C Piparo
2 player
S Manolini
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
C Piparo
2 player
M Carmichael
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
C Piparo
2 player
C Piparo
Strong Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
C Piparo
2 player
M Hinkley
Weak Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
C Piparo
2 player
M Darke
Weak Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
C Piparo
2 player
L Mills
No Correlation
0.09
1 player
C Piparo
2 player
A Edgar
No Correlation
0.32
1 player
C Piparo
2 player
E Arlott
Weak Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
C Piparo
2 player
Z Britcliffe
Weak Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
C Piparo
2 player
C Bekker
Weak Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
M Hinkley
2 player
R Mcgrath
No Correlation
-0.13
1 player
M Hinkley
2 player
S Manolini
No Correlation
0.38
1 player
M Hinkley
2 player
M Carmichael
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
M Hinkley
2 player
C Piparo
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M Hinkley
2 player
M Hinkley
Strong Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
M Hinkley
2 player
M Darke
No Correlation
0.22
1 player
M Hinkley
2 player
L Mills
Weak Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
M Hinkley
2 player
A Edgar
Weak Positive Correlation
0.45
1 player
M Hinkley
2 player
E Arlott
Positive Correlation
0.52
1 player
M Hinkley
2 player
Z Britcliffe
Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
M Hinkley
2 player
C Bekker
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.12
1 player
M Darke
2 player
R Mcgrath
No Correlation
-0.07
1 player
M Darke
2 player
S Manolini
No Correlation
0.17
1 player
M Darke
2 player
M Carmichael
No Correlation
0.31
1 player
M Darke
2 player
C Piparo
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
M Darke
2 player
M Hinkley
No Correlation
1
1 player
M Darke
2 player
M Darke
Strong Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
M Darke
2 player
L Mills
No Correlation
0.31
1 player
M Darke
2 player
A Edgar
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
M Darke
2 player
E Arlott
Weak Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
M Darke
2 player
Z Britcliffe
Weak Positive Correlation
0.01
1 player
M Darke
2 player
C Bekker
No Correlation
0.38
1 player
L Mills
2 player
R Mcgrath
Weak Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
L Mills
2 player
S Manolini
No Correlation
0.13
1 player
L Mills
2 player
M Carmichael
No Correlation
0.17
1 player
L Mills
2 player
C Piparo
No Correlation
0.22
1 player
L Mills
2 player
M Hinkley
Weak Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
L Mills
2 player
M Darke
No Correlation
1
1 player
L Mills
2 player
L Mills
Strong Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
L Mills
2 player
A Edgar
Weak Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
L Mills
2 player
E Arlott
No Correlation
0.36
1 player
L Mills
2 player
Z Britcliffe
Weak Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
L Mills
2 player
C Bekker
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.28
1 player
A Edgar
2 player
R Mcgrath
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.24
1 player
A Edgar
2 player
S Manolini
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.11
1 player
A Edgar
2 player
M Carmichael
No Correlation
0.09
1 player
A Edgar
2 player
C Piparo
No Correlation
0.24
1 player
A Edgar
2 player
M Hinkley
Weak Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
A Edgar
2 player
M Darke
Weak Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
A Edgar
2 player
L Mills
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
A Edgar
2 player
A Edgar
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.05
1 player
A Edgar
2 player
E Arlott
No Correlation
0.27
1 player
A Edgar
2 player
Z Britcliffe
Weak Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
A Edgar
2 player
C Bekker
No Correlation
0.18
1 player
E Arlott
2 player
R Mcgrath
No Correlation
-0.5
1 player
E Arlott
2 player
S Manolini
Negative Correlation
0.48
1 player
E Arlott
2 player
M Carmichael
Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
E Arlott
2 player
C Piparo
Weak Positive Correlation
0.45
1 player
E Arlott
2 player
M Hinkley
Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
E Arlott
2 player
M Darke
Weak Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
E Arlott
2 player
L Mills
No Correlation
-0.05
1 player
E Arlott
2 player
A Edgar
No Correlation
1
1 player
E Arlott
2 player
E Arlott
Strong Positive Correlation
0.48
1 player
E Arlott
2 player
Z Britcliffe
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
E Arlott
2 player
C Bekker
Negative Correlation
0.28
1 player
Z Britcliffe
2 player
R Mcgrath
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.1
1 player
Z Britcliffe
2 player
S Manolini
No Correlation
0.32
1 player
Z Britcliffe
2 player
M Carmichael
Weak Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
Z Britcliffe
2 player
C Piparo
Weak Positive Correlation
0.52
1 player
Z Britcliffe
2 player
M Hinkley
Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
Z Britcliffe
2 player
M Darke
Weak Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
Z Britcliffe
2 player
L Mills
Weak Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
Z Britcliffe
2 player
A Edgar
Weak Positive Correlation
0.48
1 player
Z Britcliffe
2 player
E Arlott
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
Z Britcliffe
2 player
Z Britcliffe
Strong Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
Z Britcliffe
2 player
C Bekker
Weak Positive Correlation
0.8
1 player
C Bekker
2 player
R Mcgrath
Strong Positive Correlation
0.76
1 player
C Bekker
2 player
S Manolini
Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
C Bekker
2 player
M Carmichael
Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
C Bekker
2 player
C Piparo
Weak Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
C Bekker
2 player
M Hinkley
Weak Positive Correlation
0.01
1 player
C Bekker
2 player
M Darke
No Correlation
0.32
1 player
C Bekker
2 player
L Mills
Weak Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
C Bekker
2 player
A Edgar
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
C Bekker
2 player
E Arlott
Negative Correlation
0.36
1 player
C Bekker
2 player
Z Britcliffe
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
C Bekker
2 player
C Bekker
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick R Mcgrath and S Manolini together
Strong Positive Correlation

Pick R Mcgrath and C Bekker together
Strong Positive Correlation

Pick S Manolini and C Bekker together
Positive Correlation

Don’t pick E Arlott and C Bekker in the same lineup
Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 A Edgar

AR
Similar Perfomance
M Darke 0.31
Z Britcliffe 0.27
M Hinkley 0.24
L Mills 0.24
C Piparo 0.09
C Bekker 0.08
Opposite Perfomance
R Mcgrath -0.28
S Manolini -0.24
M Carmichael -0.11
E Arlott -0.05

2 M Darke

WK
Similar Perfomance
C Piparo 0.31
A Edgar 0.31
Z Britcliffe 0.26
E Arlott 0.23
M Carmichael 0.17
L Mills 0.15
M Hinkley 0.14
C Bekker 0.01
Opposite Perfomance
R Mcgrath -0.12
S Manolini -0.07

3 L Mills

BOW
Similar Perfomance
R Mcgrath 0.38
Z Britcliffe 0.36
C Bekker 0.32
A Edgar 0.24
M Hinkley 0.22
E Arlott 0.18
C Piparo 0.17
M Darke 0.15
M Carmichael 0.13
S Manolini 0.07

4 C Piparo

BAT
Similar Perfomance
M Hinkley 0.33
E Arlott 0.32
M Darke 0.31
Z Britcliffe 0.31
R Mcgrath 0.28
M Carmichael 0.25
S Manolini 0.24
C Bekker 0.21
L Mills 0.17
A Edgar 0.09

5 Z Britcliffe

BOW
Similar Perfomance
M Hinkley 0.52
E Arlott 0.48
L Mills 0.36
C Bekker 0.36
M Carmichael 0.32
C Piparo 0.31
R Mcgrath 0.28
A Edgar 0.27
M Darke 0.26
Opposite Perfomance
S Manolini -0.1

Best AM-W Player Combinations

Best AM-W Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad
S Mehta BAT AM-W
G Dignam AR AM-W
C Moscript BOW AM-W
K Mack BAT AM-W
H Ferling BOW AM-W
O Porter BAT AM-W
Z Cooke BOW AM-W
G Sutcliffe BOW AM-W
A Mushangwe BOW AM-W
G Lyons WK AM-W
A Wikman BAT AM-W
S Mehta
G Dignam
C Moscript
K Mack
H Ferling
O Porter
Z Cooke
G Sutcliffe
A Mushangwe
G Lyons
A Wikman
1
1 player
S Mehta
2 player
S Mehta
Strong Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
S Mehta
2 player
G Dignam
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
S Mehta
2 player
C Moscript
Positive Correlation
-0.43
1 player
S Mehta
2 player
K Mack
Negative Correlation
-0.67
1 player
S Mehta
2 player
H Ferling
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
S Mehta
2 player
O Porter
No Correlation
-0.43
1 player
S Mehta
2 player
Z Cooke
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
S Mehta
2 player
G Sutcliffe
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
S Mehta
2 player
A Mushangwe
No Correlation
0
1 player
S Mehta
2 player
G Lyons
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
S Mehta
2 player
A Wikman
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
G Dignam
2 player
S Mehta
No Correlation
1
1 player
G Dignam
2 player
G Dignam
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
G Dignam
2 player
C Moscript
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
G Dignam
2 player
K Mack
Weak Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
G Dignam
2 player
H Ferling
No Correlation
-0.64
1 player
G Dignam
2 player
O Porter
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
G Dignam
2 player
Z Cooke
No Correlation
0
1 player
G Dignam
2 player
G Sutcliffe
No Correlation
0
1 player
G Dignam
2 player
A Mushangwe
No Correlation
-0.38
1 player
G Dignam
2 player
G Lyons
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
G Dignam
2 player
A Wikman
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
C Moscript
2 player
S Mehta
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
C Moscript
2 player
G Dignam
No Correlation
1
1 player
C Moscript
2 player
C Moscript
Strong Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
C Moscript
2 player
K Mack
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
C Moscript
2 player
H Ferling
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
C Moscript
2 player
O Porter
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
C Moscript
2 player
Z Cooke
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
C Moscript
2 player
G Sutcliffe
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
C Moscript
2 player
A Mushangwe
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
C Moscript
2 player
G Lyons
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
C Moscript
2 player
A Wikman
Positive Correlation
-0.43
1 player
K Mack
2 player
S Mehta
Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
K Mack
2 player
G Dignam
Weak Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
K Mack
2 player
C Moscript
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
K Mack
2 player
K Mack
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.31
1 player
K Mack
2 player
H Ferling
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.16
1 player
K Mack
2 player
O Porter
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
K Mack
2 player
Z Cooke
Weak Negative Correlation
0.05
1 player
K Mack
2 player
G Sutcliffe
No Correlation
0.17
1 player
K Mack
2 player
A Mushangwe
No Correlation
-0.12
1 player
K Mack
2 player
G Lyons
No Correlation
-0.13
1 player
K Mack
2 player
A Wikman
No Correlation
-0.67
1 player
H Ferling
2 player
S Mehta
Negative Correlation
0.07
1 player
H Ferling
2 player
G Dignam
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
H Ferling
2 player
C Moscript
Negative Correlation
-0.31
1 player
H Ferling
2 player
K Mack
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
H Ferling
2 player
H Ferling
Strong Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
H Ferling
2 player
O Porter
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
H Ferling
2 player
Z Cooke
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.22
1 player
H Ferling
2 player
G Sutcliffe
Weak Negative Correlation
0.11
1 player
H Ferling
2 player
A Mushangwe
No Correlation
-0.07
1 player
H Ferling
2 player
G Lyons
No Correlation
0.3
1 player
H Ferling
2 player
A Wikman
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
O Porter
2 player
S Mehta
No Correlation
-0.64
1 player
O Porter
2 player
G Dignam
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
O Porter
2 player
C Moscript
Positive Correlation
-0.16
1 player
O Porter
2 player
K Mack
No Correlation
0.07
1 player
O Porter
2 player
H Ferling
No Correlation
1
1 player
O Porter
2 player
O Porter
Strong Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
O Porter
2 player
Z Cooke
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
O Porter
2 player
G Sutcliffe
Weak Negative Correlation
0.11
1 player
O Porter
2 player
A Mushangwe
No Correlation
-0.11
1 player
O Porter
2 player
G Lyons
No Correlation
0
1 player
O Porter
2 player
A Wikman
No Correlation
-0.43
1 player
Z Cooke
2 player
S Mehta
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
Z Cooke
2 player
G Dignam
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
Z Cooke
2 player
C Moscript
Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
Z Cooke
2 player
K Mack
Weak Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
Z Cooke
2 player
H Ferling
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
Z Cooke
2 player
O Porter
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
Z Cooke
2 player
Z Cooke
Strong Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
Z Cooke
2 player
G Sutcliffe
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
Z Cooke
2 player
A Mushangwe
No Correlation
0
1 player
Z Cooke
2 player
G Lyons
No Correlation
0.09
1 player
Z Cooke
2 player
A Wikman
No Correlation
0
1 player
G Sutcliffe
2 player
S Mehta
No Correlation
0
1 player
G Sutcliffe
2 player
G Dignam
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
G Sutcliffe
2 player
C Moscript
Negative Correlation
0.05
1 player
G Sutcliffe
2 player
K Mack
No Correlation
-0.22
1 player
G Sutcliffe
2 player
H Ferling
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
G Sutcliffe
2 player
O Porter
Weak Negative Correlation
0.2
1 player
G Sutcliffe
2 player
Z Cooke
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
G Sutcliffe
2 player
G Sutcliffe
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
G Sutcliffe
2 player
A Mushangwe
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
G Sutcliffe
2 player
G Lyons
No Correlation
-0.29
1 player
G Sutcliffe
2 player
A Wikman
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
A Mushangwe
2 player
S Mehta
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Mushangwe
2 player
G Dignam
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
A Mushangwe
2 player
C Moscript
Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
A Mushangwe
2 player
K Mack
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
A Mushangwe
2 player
H Ferling
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
A Mushangwe
2 player
O Porter
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Mushangwe
2 player
Z Cooke
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Mushangwe
2 player
G Sutcliffe
No Correlation
1
1 player
A Mushangwe
2 player
A Mushangwe
Strong Positive Correlation
-1
1 player
A Mushangwe
2 player
G Lyons
Strong Negative Correlation
0
1 player
A Mushangwe
2 player
A Wikman
No Correlation
0
1 player
G Lyons
2 player
S Mehta
No Correlation
-0.38
1 player
G Lyons
2 player
G Dignam
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
G Lyons
2 player
C Moscript
No Correlation
-0.12
1 player
G Lyons
2 player
K Mack
No Correlation
-0.07
1 player
G Lyons
2 player
H Ferling
No Correlation
-0.11
1 player
G Lyons
2 player
O Porter
No Correlation
0
1 player
G Lyons
2 player
Z Cooke
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
G Lyons
2 player
G Sutcliffe
No Correlation
-1
1 player
G Lyons
2 player
A Mushangwe
Strong Negative Correlation
1
1 player
G Lyons
2 player
G Lyons
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
G Lyons
2 player
A Wikman
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
A Wikman
2 player
S Mehta
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Wikman
2 player
G Dignam
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
A Wikman
2 player
C Moscript
Positive Correlation
-0.13
1 player
A Wikman
2 player
K Mack
No Correlation
0.3
1 player
A Wikman
2 player
H Ferling
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
A Wikman
2 player
O Porter
No Correlation
0.09
1 player
A Wikman
2 player
Z Cooke
No Correlation
-0.29
1 player
A Wikman
2 player
G Sutcliffe
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
A Wikman
2 player
A Mushangwe
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Wikman
2 player
G Lyons
No Correlation
1
1 player
A Wikman
2 player
A Wikman
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

No data found

Pick S Mehta and H Ferling together
Negative Correlation

Pick G Dignam and O Porter together
Negative Correlation

Pick C Moscript and H Ferling together
Negative Correlation

Pick C Moscript and Z Cooke together
Negative Correlation

Pick C Moscript and G Sutcliffe together
Negative Correlation

Pick A Mushangwe and G Lyons together
Strong Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 H Ferling

BOW
Similar Perfomance
Z Cooke 0.33
A Wikman 0.3
A Mushangwe 0.11
G Dignam 0.07
O Porter 0.07
Opposite Perfomance
C Moscript -0.7
S Mehta -0.67
K Mack -0.31
G Sutcliffe -0.22
G Lyons -0.07

2 G Dignam

AR
Similar Perfomance
K Mack 0.33
S Mehta 0.14
H Ferling 0.07
Opposite Perfomance
O Porter -0.64
G Lyons -0.38

3 K Mack

BAT
Similar Perfomance
C Moscript 0.7
G Dignam 0.33
A Mushangwe 0.17
G Sutcliffe 0.05
Opposite Perfomance
S Mehta -0.43
Z Cooke -0.33
H Ferling -0.31
O Porter -0.16
A Wikman -0.13
G Lyons -0.12

4 Z Cooke

BOW
Similar Perfomance
H Ferling 0.33
O Porter 0.23
G Sutcliffe 0.2
A Wikman 0.09
Opposite Perfomance
C Moscript -0.7
S Mehta -0.43
K Mack -0.33

5 A Mushangwe

BOW
Similar Perfomance
C Moscript 0.7
K Mack 0.17
H Ferling 0.11
O Porter 0.11
Opposite Perfomance
G Lyons -1
S Mehta -0.14

Best WA-W Player Combinations

Best WA-W Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad
R Mcgrath BAT WA-W
S Manolini BOW WA-W
M Carmichael BAT WA-W
C Piparo BAT WA-W
M Hinkley BAT WA-W
M Darke WK WA-W
L Mills BOW WA-W
A Edgar AR WA-W
E Arlott BOW WA-W
Z Britcliffe BOW WA-W
C Bekker BOW WA-W
R Mcgrath
S Manolini
M Carmichael
C Piparo
M Hinkley
M Darke
L Mills
A Edgar
E Arlott
Z Britcliffe
C Bekker
1
1 player
R Mcgrath
2 player
R Mcgrath
Strong Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
R Mcgrath
2 player
S Manolini
Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
R Mcgrath
2 player
M Carmichael
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
R Mcgrath
2 player
C Piparo
No Correlation
0
1 player
R Mcgrath
2 player
M Hinkley
No Correlation
-0.67
1 player
R Mcgrath
2 player
M Darke
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
R Mcgrath
2 player
L Mills
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
R Mcgrath
2 player
A Edgar
Negative Correlation
0.35
1 player
R Mcgrath
2 player
E Arlott
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
R Mcgrath
2 player
Z Britcliffe
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
R Mcgrath
2 player
C Bekker
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
S Manolini
2 player
R Mcgrath
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
S Manolini
2 player
S Manolini
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.11
1 player
S Manolini
2 player
M Carmichael
No Correlation
0.56
1 player
S Manolini
2 player
C Piparo
Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
S Manolini
2 player
M Hinkley
No Correlation
-0.56
1 player
S Manolini
2 player
M Darke
Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
S Manolini
2 player
L Mills
No Correlation
-0.25
1 player
S Manolini
2 player
A Edgar
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
S Manolini
2 player
E Arlott
No Correlation
-0.56
1 player
S Manolini
2 player
Z Britcliffe
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
S Manolini
2 player
C Bekker
Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
M Carmichael
2 player
R Mcgrath
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.11
1 player
M Carmichael
2 player
S Manolini
No Correlation
1
1 player
M Carmichael
2 player
M Carmichael
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.2
1 player
M Carmichael
2 player
C Piparo
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
M Carmichael
2 player
M Hinkley
No Correlation
-0.21
1 player
M Carmichael
2 player
M Darke
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
M Carmichael
2 player
L Mills
No Correlation
-0.41
1 player
M Carmichael
2 player
A Edgar
Negative Correlation
0.35
1 player
M Carmichael
2 player
E Arlott
Weak Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
M Carmichael
2 player
Z Britcliffe
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
M Carmichael
2 player
C Bekker
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
C Piparo
2 player
R Mcgrath
No Correlation
0.56
1 player
C Piparo
2 player
S Manolini
Positive Correlation
-0.2
1 player
C Piparo
2 player
M Carmichael
No Correlation
1
1 player
C Piparo
2 player
C Piparo
Strong Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
C Piparo
2 player
M Hinkley
No Correlation
0
1 player
C Piparo
2 player
M Darke
No Correlation
0.07
1 player
C Piparo
2 player
L Mills
No Correlation
-0.11
1 player
C Piparo
2 player
A Edgar
No Correlation
0
1 player
C Piparo
2 player
E Arlott
No Correlation
-0.29
1 player
C Piparo
2 player
Z Britcliffe
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.38
1 player
C Piparo
2 player
C Bekker
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
M Hinkley
2 player
R Mcgrath
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
M Hinkley
2 player
S Manolini
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
M Hinkley
2 player
M Carmichael
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
M Hinkley
2 player
C Piparo
No Correlation
1
1 player
M Hinkley
2 player
M Hinkley
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
M Hinkley
2 player
M Darke
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.67
1 player
M Hinkley
2 player
L Mills
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
M Hinkley
2 player
A Edgar
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
M Hinkley
2 player
E Arlott
Weak Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
M Hinkley
2 player
Z Britcliffe
No Correlation
-0.11
1 player
M Hinkley
2 player
C Bekker
No Correlation
-0.67
1 player
M Darke
2 player
R Mcgrath
Negative Correlation
-0.56
1 player
M Darke
2 player
S Manolini
Negative Correlation
-0.21
1 player
M Darke
2 player
M Carmichael
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
M Darke
2 player
C Piparo
No Correlation
-0.23
1 player
M Darke
2 player
M Hinkley
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
M Darke
2 player
M Darke
Strong Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
M Darke
2 player
L Mills
No Correlation
0.44
1 player
M Darke
2 player
A Edgar
Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
M Darke
2 player
E Arlott
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.15
1 player
M Darke
2 player
Z Britcliffe
No Correlation
-0.45
1 player
M Darke
2 player
C Bekker
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
L Mills
2 player
R Mcgrath
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
L Mills
2 player
S Manolini
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
L Mills
2 player
M Carmichael
No Correlation
0.07
1 player
L Mills
2 player
C Piparo
No Correlation
-0.67
1 player
L Mills
2 player
M Hinkley
Negative Correlation
0.15
1 player
L Mills
2 player
M Darke
No Correlation
1
1 player
L Mills
2 player
L Mills
Strong Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
L Mills
2 player
A Edgar
No Correlation
-0.35
1 player
L Mills
2 player
E Arlott
Weak Negative Correlation
0.08
1 player
L Mills
2 player
Z Britcliffe
No Correlation
-0.08
1 player
L Mills
2 player
C Bekker
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
A Edgar
2 player
R Mcgrath
Negative Correlation
-0.25
1 player
A Edgar
2 player
S Manolini
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.41
1 player
A Edgar
2 player
M Carmichael
Negative Correlation
-0.11
1 player
A Edgar
2 player
C Piparo
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Edgar
2 player
M Hinkley
No Correlation
0.44
1 player
A Edgar
2 player
M Darke
Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
A Edgar
2 player
L Mills
No Correlation
1
1 player
A Edgar
2 player
A Edgar
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
A Edgar
2 player
E Arlott
Weak Negative Correlation
0.04
1 player
A Edgar
2 player
Z Britcliffe
No Correlation
-0.2
1 player
A Edgar
2 player
C Bekker
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
E Arlott
2 player
R Mcgrath
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
E Arlott
2 player
S Manolini
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
E Arlott
2 player
M Carmichael
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
E Arlott
2 player
C Piparo
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
E Arlott
2 player
M Hinkley
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
E Arlott
2 player
M Darke
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.35
1 player
E Arlott
2 player
L Mills
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.35
1 player
E Arlott
2 player
A Edgar
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
E Arlott
2 player
E Arlott
Strong Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
E Arlott
2 player
Z Britcliffe
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
E Arlott
2 player
C Bekker
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
Z Britcliffe
2 player
R Mcgrath
No Correlation
-0.56
1 player
Z Britcliffe
2 player
S Manolini
Negative Correlation
0.07
1 player
Z Britcliffe
2 player
M Carmichael
No Correlation
-0.29
1 player
Z Britcliffe
2 player
C Piparo
Weak Negative Correlation
0.08
1 player
Z Britcliffe
2 player
M Hinkley
No Correlation
-0.15
1 player
Z Britcliffe
2 player
M Darke
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
Z Britcliffe
2 player
L Mills
No Correlation
0.04
1 player
Z Britcliffe
2 player
A Edgar
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
Z Britcliffe
2 player
E Arlott
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
Z Britcliffe
2 player
Z Britcliffe
Strong Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
Z Britcliffe
2 player
C Bekker
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
C Bekker
2 player
R Mcgrath
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
C Bekker
2 player
S Manolini
Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
C Bekker
2 player
M Carmichael
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.38
1 player
C Bekker
2 player
C Piparo
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.11
1 player
C Bekker
2 player
M Hinkley
No Correlation
-0.45
1 player
C Bekker
2 player
M Darke
Negative Correlation
-0.08
1 player
C Bekker
2 player
L Mills
No Correlation
-0.2
1 player
C Bekker
2 player
A Edgar
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
C Bekker
2 player
E Arlott
Negative Correlation
0.08
1 player
C Bekker
2 player
Z Britcliffe
No Correlation
1
1 player
C Bekker
2 player
C Bekker
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

No data found

Pick R Mcgrath and M Darke together
Negative Correlation

Pick R Mcgrath and A Edgar together
Negative Correlation

Pick M Hinkley and L Mills together
Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 A Edgar

AR
Similar Perfomance
M Darke 0.44
L Mills 0.12
Z Britcliffe 0.04
Opposite Perfomance
R Mcgrath -0.7
M Carmichael -0.41
E Arlott -0.35
S Manolini -0.25
C Bekker -0.2
C Piparo -0.11

2 M Darke

WK
Similar Perfomance
A Edgar 0.44
L Mills 0.15
Opposite Perfomance
R Mcgrath -0.67
S Manolini -0.56
C Bekker -0.45
E Arlott -0.35
M Hinkley -0.23
M Carmichael -0.21
Z Britcliffe -0.15

3 L Mills

BOW
Similar Perfomance
M Darke 0.15
S Manolini 0.14
A Edgar 0.12
Z Britcliffe 0.08
C Piparo 0.07
Opposite Perfomance
M Hinkley -0.67
E Arlott -0.35
M Carmichael -0.14
C Bekker -0.08

4 C Piparo

BAT
Similar Perfomance
S Manolini 0.56
M Hinkley 0.08
L Mills 0.07
Opposite Perfomance
C Bekker -0.38
Z Britcliffe -0.29
M Carmichael -0.2
A Edgar -0.11

5 Z Britcliffe

BOW
Similar Perfomance
E Arlott 0.35
M Hinkley 0.08
L Mills 0.08
C Bekker 0.08
M Carmichael 0.07
A Edgar 0.04
Opposite Perfomance
S Manolini -0.56
C Piparo -0.29
M Darke -0.15

PerfectLineup © 2025. All Rights Reserved