AUS 29 May 04:30 am NAM

Lineup Out

Queen's Park Oval, Port of Spain
Mens T20 World Cup Warm-up Matches

Best Player Combinations For
AUS vs NAM

How it Works?

This guide is super useful for identifying player combinations that are likely to score big. Use the filters to identify the best player combinations according to specific match scenarios.

Player correlate positively

Both players generally perform similarly when picked together. They either score high together or score low together. Maximise FPts by picking players that correlate positively with top players.

Player correlate negatively

Both players generally perform in an opposite manner. If one player scores high, the other usually scores low. Avoid picking players that correlate negatively with top player

Show Player Combinations on the basis of:

Best AUS Player Combinations

Best AUS Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad
A Agar BOW AUS
J Inglis WK AUS
A Zampa BOW AUS
G Maxwell AR AUS
M Wade WK AUS
T David BAT AUS
N Ellis BOW AUS
J Hazlewood BOW AUS
D Warner BAT AUS
A Agar
J Inglis
A Zampa
G Maxwell
M Wade
T David
N Ellis
J Hazlewood
D Warner
1
1 player
A Agar
2 player
A Agar
Strong Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
A Agar
2 player
J Inglis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
A Agar
2 player
A Zampa
No Correlation
0.22
1 player
A Agar
2 player
G Maxwell
Weak Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
A Agar
2 player
M Wade
Weak Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
A Agar
2 player
T David
Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
A Agar
2 player
N Ellis
Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
A Agar
2 player
J Hazlewood
No Correlation
0.05
1 player
A Agar
2 player
D Warner
No Correlation
0.27
1 player
J Inglis
2 player
A Agar
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
J Inglis
2 player
J Inglis
Strong Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
J Inglis
2 player
A Zampa
Weak Positive Correlation
0.06
1 player
J Inglis
2 player
G Maxwell
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
J Inglis
2 player
M Wade
Weak Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
J Inglis
2 player
T David
No Correlation
-0.13
1 player
J Inglis
2 player
N Ellis
No Correlation
0.04
1 player
J Inglis
2 player
J Hazlewood
No Correlation
0
1 player
J Inglis
2 player
D Warner
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
A Zampa
2 player
A Agar
No Correlation
0.26
1 player
A Zampa
2 player
J Inglis
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
A Zampa
2 player
A Zampa
Strong Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
A Zampa
2 player
G Maxwell
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Zampa
2 player
M Wade
No Correlation
0.22
1 player
A Zampa
2 player
T David
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
A Zampa
2 player
N Ellis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
A Zampa
2 player
J Hazlewood
No Correlation
0.27
1 player
A Zampa
2 player
D Warner
Weak Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
G Maxwell
2 player
A Agar
Weak Positive Correlation
0.06
1 player
G Maxwell
2 player
J Inglis
No Correlation
0.1
1 player
G Maxwell
2 player
A Zampa
No Correlation
1
1 player
G Maxwell
2 player
G Maxwell
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.02
1 player
G Maxwell
2 player
M Wade
No Correlation
-0.07
1 player
G Maxwell
2 player
T David
No Correlation
-0.17
1 player
G Maxwell
2 player
N Ellis
No Correlation
0.3
1 player
G Maxwell
2 player
J Hazlewood
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.16
1 player
G Maxwell
2 player
D Warner
No Correlation
0.3
1 player
M Wade
2 player
A Agar
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
M Wade
2 player
J Inglis
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
M Wade
2 player
A Zampa
No Correlation
-0.02
1 player
M Wade
2 player
G Maxwell
No Correlation
1
1 player
M Wade
2 player
M Wade
Strong Positive Correlation
0.41
1 player
M Wade
2 player
T David
Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
M Wade
2 player
N Ellis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
M Wade
2 player
J Hazlewood
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
M Wade
2 player
D Warner
Weak Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
T David
2 player
A Agar
Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
T David
2 player
J Inglis
No Correlation
0.22
1 player
T David
2 player
A Zampa
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.07
1 player
T David
2 player
G Maxwell
No Correlation
0.41
1 player
T David
2 player
M Wade
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
T David
2 player
T David
Strong Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
T David
2 player
N Ellis
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
T David
2 player
J Hazlewood
No Correlation
0.21
1 player
T David
2 player
D Warner
Weak Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
N Ellis
2 player
A Agar
Positive Correlation
-0.13
1 player
N Ellis
2 player
J Inglis
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
N Ellis
2 player
A Zampa
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.17
1 player
N Ellis
2 player
G Maxwell
No Correlation
0.26
1 player
N Ellis
2 player
M Wade
Weak Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
N Ellis
2 player
T David
No Correlation
1
1 player
N Ellis
2 player
N Ellis
Strong Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
N Ellis
2 player
J Hazlewood
Weak Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
N Ellis
2 player
D Warner
Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
J Hazlewood
2 player
A Agar
No Correlation
0.04
1 player
J Hazlewood
2 player
J Inglis
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
J Hazlewood
2 player
A Zampa
No Correlation
0.3
1 player
J Hazlewood
2 player
G Maxwell
Weak Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
J Hazlewood
2 player
M Wade
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
J Hazlewood
2 player
T David
No Correlation
0.22
1 player
J Hazlewood
2 player
N Ellis
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
J Hazlewood
2 player
J Hazlewood
Strong Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
J Hazlewood
2 player
D Warner
Weak Positive Correlation
0.05
1 player
D Warner
2 player
A Agar
No Correlation
0
1 player
D Warner
2 player
J Inglis
No Correlation
0.27
1 player
D Warner
2 player
A Zampa
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.16
1 player
D Warner
2 player
G Maxwell
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
D Warner
2 player
M Wade
Weak Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
D Warner
2 player
T David
Weak Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
D Warner
2 player
N Ellis
Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
D Warner
2 player
J Hazlewood
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
D Warner
2 player
D Warner
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

No data found

High Performing Players

1 A Zampa

BOW
Similar Perfomance
D Warner 0.27
J Inglis 0.26
T David 0.22
N Ellis 0.2
J Hazlewood 0.14
G Maxwell 0.1
A Agar 0.08

2 G Maxwell

AR
Similar Perfomance
J Hazlewood 0.3
A Agar 0.22
A Zampa 0.1
J Inglis 0.06
Opposite Perfomance
N Ellis -0.17
D Warner -0.16
T David -0.07
M Wade -0.02

3 T David

BAT
Similar Perfomance
M Wade 0.41
A Agar 0.4
A Zampa 0.22
D Warner 0.21
N Ellis 0.18
J Hazlewood 0.11
J Inglis 0.09
Opposite Perfomance
G Maxwell -0.07

4 D Warner

BAT
Similar Perfomance
N Ellis 0.43
A Zampa 0.27
M Wade 0.25
T David 0.21
J Hazlewood 0.21
A Agar 0.05
Opposite Perfomance
G Maxwell -0.16

5 N Ellis

BOW
Similar Perfomance
A Agar 0.47
D Warner 0.43
M Wade 0.26
J Hazlewood 0.22
A Zampa 0.2
T David 0.18
Opposite Perfomance
G Maxwell -0.17
J Inglis -0.13

Best NAM Player Combinations

Best NAM Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad
J Smit BAT NAM
J Frylinck AR NAM
G Merwe Erasmus AR NAM
Z Green WK NAM
J Kotze WK NAM
B Scholtz BOW NAM
N Davin BAT NAM
D Wiese AR NAM
R Trumpelmann BOW NAM
M van Lingen BAT NAM
M Kruger BAT NAM
J Smit
J Frylinck
G Merwe Erasmus
Z Green
J Kotze
B Scholtz
N Davin
D Wiese
R Trumpelmann
M van Lingen
M Kruger
1
1 player
J Smit
2 player
J Smit
Strong Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
J Smit
2 player
J Frylinck
Weak Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
J Smit
2 player
G Merwe Erasmus
Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
J Smit
2 player
Z Green
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
J Smit
2 player
J Kotze
Weak Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
J Smit
2 player
B Scholtz
Weak Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
J Smit
2 player
N Davin
Weak Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
J Smit
2 player
D Wiese
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
J Smit
2 player
R Trumpelmann
No Correlation
0.3
1 player
J Smit
2 player
M van Lingen
Weak Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
J Smit
2 player
M Kruger
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
J Frylinck
2 player
J Smit
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
J Frylinck
2 player
J Frylinck
Strong Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
J Frylinck
2 player
G Merwe Erasmus
No Correlation
0.17
1 player
J Frylinck
2 player
Z Green
No Correlation
0.29
1 player
J Frylinck
2 player
J Kotze
Weak Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
J Frylinck
2 player
B Scholtz
No Correlation
0.03
1 player
J Frylinck
2 player
N Davin
No Correlation
0.21
1 player
J Frylinck
2 player
D Wiese
Weak Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
J Frylinck
2 player
R Trumpelmann
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.01
1 player
J Frylinck
2 player
M van Lingen
No Correlation
0.22
1 player
J Frylinck
2 player
M Kruger
Weak Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
G Merwe Erasmus
2 player
J Smit
Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
G Merwe Erasmus
2 player
J Frylinck
No Correlation
1
1 player
G Merwe Erasmus
2 player
G Merwe Erasmus
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.12
1 player
G Merwe Erasmus
2 player
Z Green
No Correlation
0.06
1 player
G Merwe Erasmus
2 player
J Kotze
No Correlation
0.13
1 player
G Merwe Erasmus
2 player
B Scholtz
No Correlation
0.24
1 player
G Merwe Erasmus
2 player
N Davin
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
G Merwe Erasmus
2 player
D Wiese
Weak Positive Correlation
0.02
1 player
G Merwe Erasmus
2 player
R Trumpelmann
No Correlation
0.22
1 player
G Merwe Erasmus
2 player
M van Lingen
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.13
1 player
G Merwe Erasmus
2 player
M Kruger
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
Z Green
2 player
J Smit
Weak Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
Z Green
2 player
J Frylinck
No Correlation
-0.12
1 player
Z Green
2 player
G Merwe Erasmus
No Correlation
1
1 player
Z Green
2 player
Z Green
Strong Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
Z Green
2 player
J Kotze
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
Z Green
2 player
B Scholtz
Weak Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
Z Green
2 player
N Davin
Weak Positive Correlation
0.19
1 player
Z Green
2 player
D Wiese
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
Z Green
2 player
R Trumpelmann
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
Z Green
2 player
M van Lingen
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
Z Green
2 player
M Kruger
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
J Kotze
2 player
J Smit
Weak Positive Correlation
0.29
1 player
J Kotze
2 player
J Frylinck
Weak Positive Correlation
0.06
1 player
J Kotze
2 player
G Merwe Erasmus
No Correlation
0.22
1 player
J Kotze
2 player
Z Green
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
J Kotze
2 player
J Kotze
Strong Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
J Kotze
2 player
B Scholtz
No Correlation
-0.04
1 player
J Kotze
2 player
N Davin
No Correlation
0.07
1 player
J Kotze
2 player
D Wiese
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
J Kotze
2 player
R Trumpelmann
No Correlation
-0.01
1 player
J Kotze
2 player
M van Lingen
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
J Kotze
2 player
M Kruger
No Correlation
0.3
1 player
B Scholtz
2 player
J Smit
Weak Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
B Scholtz
2 player
J Frylinck
No Correlation
0.13
1 player
B Scholtz
2 player
G Merwe Erasmus
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
B Scholtz
2 player
Z Green
Weak Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
B Scholtz
2 player
J Kotze
No Correlation
1
1 player
B Scholtz
2 player
B Scholtz
Strong Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
B Scholtz
2 player
N Davin
Weak Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
B Scholtz
2 player
D Wiese
Weak Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
B Scholtz
2 player
R Trumpelmann
Weak Positive Correlation
0.37
1 player
B Scholtz
2 player
M van Lingen
Weak Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
B Scholtz
2 player
M Kruger
Weak Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
N Davin
2 player
J Smit
Weak Positive Correlation
0.03
1 player
N Davin
2 player
J Frylinck
No Correlation
0.24
1 player
N Davin
2 player
G Merwe Erasmus
Weak Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
N Davin
2 player
Z Green
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.04
1 player
N Davin
2 player
J Kotze
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
N Davin
2 player
B Scholtz
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
N Davin
2 player
N Davin
Strong Positive Correlation
0.01
1 player
N Davin
2 player
D Wiese
No Correlation
-0.04
1 player
N Davin
2 player
R Trumpelmann
No Correlation
0.44
1 player
N Davin
2 player
M van Lingen
Positive Correlation
0.29
1 player
N Davin
2 player
M Kruger
Weak Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
D Wiese
2 player
J Smit
No Correlation
0.21
1 player
D Wiese
2 player
J Frylinck
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
D Wiese
2 player
G Merwe Erasmus
Weak Positive Correlation
0.19
1 player
D Wiese
2 player
Z Green
No Correlation
0.07
1 player
D Wiese
2 player
J Kotze
No Correlation
0.39
1 player
D Wiese
2 player
B Scholtz
Weak Positive Correlation
0.01
1 player
D Wiese
2 player
N Davin
No Correlation
1
1 player
D Wiese
2 player
D Wiese
Strong Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
D Wiese
2 player
R Trumpelmann
Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
D Wiese
2 player
M van Lingen
Weak Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
D Wiese
2 player
M Kruger
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
R Trumpelmann
2 player
J Smit
No Correlation
0.38
1 player
R Trumpelmann
2 player
J Frylinck
Weak Positive Correlation
0.02
1 player
R Trumpelmann
2 player
G Merwe Erasmus
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
R Trumpelmann
2 player
Z Green
Weak Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
R Trumpelmann
2 player
J Kotze
No Correlation
0.22
1 player
R Trumpelmann
2 player
B Scholtz
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.04
1 player
R Trumpelmann
2 player
N Davin
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
R Trumpelmann
2 player
D Wiese
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
R Trumpelmann
2 player
R Trumpelmann
Strong Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
R Trumpelmann
2 player
M van Lingen
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
R Trumpelmann
2 player
M Kruger
No Correlation
0.3
1 player
M van Lingen
2 player
J Smit
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.01
1 player
M van Lingen
2 player
J Frylinck
No Correlation
0.22
1 player
M van Lingen
2 player
G Merwe Erasmus
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
M van Lingen
2 player
Z Green
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.01
1 player
M van Lingen
2 player
J Kotze
No Correlation
0.37
1 player
M van Lingen
2 player
B Scholtz
Weak Positive Correlation
0.44
1 player
M van Lingen
2 player
N Davin
Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
M van Lingen
2 player
D Wiese
Weak Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
M van Lingen
2 player
R Trumpelmann
No Correlation
1
1 player
M van Lingen
2 player
M van Lingen
Strong Positive Correlation
0.67
1 player
M van Lingen
2 player
M Kruger
Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
M Kruger
2 player
J Smit
Weak Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
M Kruger
2 player
J Frylinck
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.13
1 player
M Kruger
2 player
G Merwe Erasmus
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
M Kruger
2 player
Z Green
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
M Kruger
2 player
J Kotze
No Correlation
0.31
1 player
M Kruger
2 player
B Scholtz
Weak Positive Correlation
0.29
1 player
M Kruger
2 player
N Davin
Weak Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
M Kruger
2 player
D Wiese
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
M Kruger
2 player
R Trumpelmann
No Correlation
0.67
1 player
M Kruger
2 player
M van Lingen
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M Kruger
2 player
M Kruger
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick M van Lingen and M Kruger together
Positive Correlation

High Performing Players

1 G Merwe Erasmus

AR
Similar Perfomance
J Smit 0.43
N Davin 0.24
M van Lingen 0.22
D Wiese 0.2
B Scholtz 0.13
J Frylinck 0.12
J Kotze 0.06
R Trumpelmann 0.02
Opposite Perfomance
M Kruger -0.13
Z Green -0.12

2 D Wiese

AR
Similar Perfomance
R Trumpelmann 0.42
B Scholtz 0.39
M van Lingen 0.3
J Frylinck 0.21
G Merwe Erasmus 0.2
Z Green 0.19
J Smit 0.11
M Kruger 0.09
J Kotze 0.07
N Davin 0.01

3 B Scholtz

BOW
Similar Perfomance
D Wiese 0.39
M van Lingen 0.37
Z Green 0.35
M Kruger 0.31
J Smit 0.3
N Davin 0.25
R Trumpelmann 0.22
J Frylinck 0.17
G Merwe Erasmus 0.13
J Kotze 0.1

4 J Frylinck

AR
Similar Perfomance
R Trumpelmann 0.38
J Kotze 0.29
J Smit 0.25
M Kruger 0.22
D Wiese 0.21
Z Green 0.17
B Scholtz 0.17
G Merwe Erasmus 0.12
N Davin 0.03
Opposite Perfomance
M van Lingen -0.01

5 R Trumpelmann

BOW
Similar Perfomance
D Wiese 0.42
J Frylinck 0.38
Z Green 0.25
B Scholtz 0.22
M van Lingen 0.13
J Smit 0.08
J Kotze 0.08
G Merwe Erasmus 0.02
Opposite Perfomance
M Kruger -0.14
N Davin -0.04

Best AUS Player Combinations

Best AUS Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad
A Agar BOW AUS
J Inglis WK AUS
A Zampa BOW AUS
G Maxwell AR AUS
M Wade WK AUS
T David BAT AUS
N Ellis BOW AUS
J Hazlewood BOW AUS
D Warner BAT AUS
A Agar
J Inglis
A Zampa
G Maxwell
M Wade
T David
N Ellis
J Hazlewood
D Warner
1
1 player
A Agar
2 player
A Agar
Strong Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
A Agar
2 player
J Inglis
Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
A Agar
2 player
A Zampa
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
A Agar
2 player
G Maxwell
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
A Agar
2 player
M Wade
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
A Agar
2 player
T David
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
A Agar
2 player
N Ellis
Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
A Agar
2 player
J Hazlewood
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Agar
2 player
D Warner
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
J Inglis
2 player
A Agar
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
J Inglis
2 player
J Inglis
Strong Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
J Inglis
2 player
A Zampa
Positive Correlation
-0.09
1 player
J Inglis
2 player
G Maxwell
No Correlation
-0.45
1 player
J Inglis
2 player
M Wade
Negative Correlation
-0.07
1 player
J Inglis
2 player
T David
No Correlation
-0.78
1 player
J Inglis
2 player
N Ellis
Negative Correlation
-0.43
1 player
J Inglis
2 player
J Hazlewood
Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
J Inglis
2 player
D Warner
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
A Zampa
2 player
A Agar
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
A Zampa
2 player
J Inglis
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
A Zampa
2 player
A Zampa
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.1
1 player
A Zampa
2 player
G Maxwell
No Correlation
-0.3
1 player
A Zampa
2 player
M Wade
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.1
1 player
A Zampa
2 player
T David
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
A Zampa
2 player
N Ellis
No Correlation
-0.25
1 player
A Zampa
2 player
J Hazlewood
Weak Negative Correlation
0.29
1 player
A Zampa
2 player
D Warner
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
G Maxwell
2 player
A Agar
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.09
1 player
G Maxwell
2 player
J Inglis
No Correlation
-0.1
1 player
G Maxwell
2 player
A Zampa
No Correlation
1
1 player
G Maxwell
2 player
G Maxwell
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.27
1 player
G Maxwell
2 player
M Wade
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.55
1 player
G Maxwell
2 player
T David
Negative Correlation
-0.56
1 player
G Maxwell
2 player
N Ellis
Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
G Maxwell
2 player
J Hazlewood
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.47
1 player
G Maxwell
2 player
D Warner
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
M Wade
2 player
A Agar
No Correlation
-0.45
1 player
M Wade
2 player
J Inglis
Negative Correlation
-0.3
1 player
M Wade
2 player
A Zampa
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.27
1 player
M Wade
2 player
G Maxwell
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
M Wade
2 player
M Wade
Strong Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
M Wade
2 player
T David
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
M Wade
2 player
N Ellis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
M Wade
2 player
J Hazlewood
No Correlation
0.26
1 player
M Wade
2 player
D Warner
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
T David
2 player
A Agar
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.07
1 player
T David
2 player
J Inglis
No Correlation
-0.1
1 player
T David
2 player
A Zampa
No Correlation
-0.55
1 player
T David
2 player
G Maxwell
Negative Correlation
0.12
1 player
T David
2 player
M Wade
No Correlation
1
1 player
T David
2 player
T David
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
T David
2 player
N Ellis
No Correlation
-0.06
1 player
T David
2 player
J Hazlewood
No Correlation
0.26
1 player
T David
2 player
D Warner
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
N Ellis
2 player
A Agar
Negative Correlation
-0.78
1 player
N Ellis
2 player
J Inglis
Negative Correlation
0.11
1 player
N Ellis
2 player
A Zampa
No Correlation
-0.56
1 player
N Ellis
2 player
G Maxwell
Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
N Ellis
2 player
M Wade
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
N Ellis
2 player
T David
No Correlation
1
1 player
N Ellis
2 player
N Ellis
Strong Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
N Ellis
2 player
J Hazlewood
Positive Correlation
0.67
1 player
N Ellis
2 player
D Warner
Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
J Hazlewood
2 player
A Agar
No Correlation
-0.43
1 player
J Hazlewood
2 player
J Inglis
Negative Correlation
-0.25
1 player
J Hazlewood
2 player
A Zampa
Weak Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
J Hazlewood
2 player
G Maxwell
Weak Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
J Hazlewood
2 player
M Wade
No Correlation
-0.06
1 player
J Hazlewood
2 player
T David
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
J Hazlewood
2 player
N Ellis
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
J Hazlewood
2 player
J Hazlewood
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.18
1 player
J Hazlewood
2 player
D Warner
No Correlation
0
1 player
D Warner
2 player
A Agar
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
D Warner
2 player
J Inglis
No Correlation
0.29
1 player
D Warner
2 player
A Zampa
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.47
1 player
D Warner
2 player
G Maxwell
Negative Correlation
0.26
1 player
D Warner
2 player
M Wade
Weak Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
D Warner
2 player
T David
Weak Positive Correlation
0.67
1 player
D Warner
2 player
N Ellis
Positive Correlation
-0.18
1 player
D Warner
2 player
J Hazlewood
No Correlation
1
1 player
D Warner
2 player
D Warner
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick A Agar and J Inglis together
Positive Correlation

Pick N Ellis and D Warner together
Positive Correlation

Pick A Agar and N Ellis together
Negative Correlation

Pick J Inglis and N Ellis together
Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 A Zampa

BOW
Similar Perfomance
J Inglis 0.4
D Warner 0.29
N Ellis 0.11
Opposite Perfomance
M Wade -0.3
J Hazlewood -0.25
A Agar -0.14
G Maxwell -0.1
T David -0.1

2 G Maxwell

AR
Similar Perfomance
J Hazlewood 0.33
Opposite Perfomance
N Ellis -0.56
T David -0.55
D Warner -0.47
A Agar -0.33
M Wade -0.27
A Zampa -0.1
J Inglis -0.09

3 D Warner

BAT
Similar Perfomance
N Ellis 0.67
A Zampa 0.29
M Wade 0.26
T David 0.26
Opposite Perfomance
G Maxwell -0.47
J Hazlewood -0.18
J Inglis -0.14

4 T David

BAT
Similar Perfomance
A Agar 0.33
D Warner 0.26
M Wade 0.12
Opposite Perfomance
G Maxwell -0.55
N Ellis -0.14
A Zampa -0.1
J Inglis -0.07
J Hazlewood -0.06

5 M Wade

WK
Similar Perfomance
N Ellis 0.33
D Warner 0.26
J Hazlewood 0.18
T David 0.12
Opposite Perfomance
J Inglis -0.45
A Zampa -0.3
G Maxwell -0.27

Best NAM Player Combinations

Best NAM Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad
J Smit BAT NAM
J Frylinck AR NAM
G Merwe Erasmus AR NAM
Z Green WK NAM
J Kotze WK NAM
B Scholtz BOW NAM
N Davin BAT NAM
D Wiese AR NAM
R Trumpelmann BOW NAM
M van Lingen BAT NAM
M Kruger BAT NAM
J Smit
J Frylinck
G Merwe Erasmus
Z Green
J Kotze
B Scholtz
N Davin
D Wiese
R Trumpelmann
M van Lingen
M Kruger
1
1 player
J Smit
2 player
J Smit
Strong Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
J Smit
2 player
J Frylinck
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
J Smit
2 player
G Merwe Erasmus
Weak Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
J Smit
2 player
Z Green
No Correlation
0.07
1 player
J Smit
2 player
J Kotze
No Correlation
-0.1
1 player
J Smit
2 player
B Scholtz
No Correlation
0
1 player
J Smit
2 player
N Davin
No Correlation
-0.08
1 player
J Smit
2 player
D Wiese
No Correlation
0
1 player
J Smit
2 player
R Trumpelmann
No Correlation
0.22
1 player
J Smit
2 player
M van Lingen
Weak Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
J Smit
2 player
M Kruger
No Correlation
0.26
1 player
J Frylinck
2 player
J Smit
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
J Frylinck
2 player
J Frylinck
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.16
1 player
J Frylinck
2 player
G Merwe Erasmus
No Correlation
-0.25
1 player
J Frylinck
2 player
Z Green
Weak Negative Correlation
0.16
1 player
J Frylinck
2 player
J Kotze
No Correlation
0
1 player
J Frylinck
2 player
B Scholtz
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
J Frylinck
2 player
N Davin
Weak Negative Correlation
0.06
1 player
J Frylinck
2 player
D Wiese
No Correlation
0.43
1 player
J Frylinck
2 player
R Trumpelmann
Positive Correlation
-0.29
1 player
J Frylinck
2 player
M van Lingen
Weak Negative Correlation
0.08
1 player
J Frylinck
2 player
M Kruger
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
G Merwe Erasmus
2 player
J Smit
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.16
1 player
G Merwe Erasmus
2 player
J Frylinck
No Correlation
1
1 player
G Merwe Erasmus
2 player
G Merwe Erasmus
Strong Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
G Merwe Erasmus
2 player
Z Green
No Correlation
-0.47
1 player
G Merwe Erasmus
2 player
J Kotze
Negative Correlation
0.2
1 player
G Merwe Erasmus
2 player
B Scholtz
Weak Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
G Merwe Erasmus
2 player
N Davin
No Correlation
0.29
1 player
G Merwe Erasmus
2 player
D Wiese
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.11
1 player
G Merwe Erasmus
2 player
R Trumpelmann
No Correlation
0
1 player
G Merwe Erasmus
2 player
M van Lingen
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
G Merwe Erasmus
2 player
M Kruger
Weak Negative Correlation
0.1
1 player
Z Green
2 player
J Smit
No Correlation
-0.25
1 player
Z Green
2 player
J Frylinck
Weak Negative Correlation
0.1
1 player
Z Green
2 player
G Merwe Erasmus
No Correlation
1
1 player
Z Green
2 player
Z Green
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.6
1 player
Z Green
2 player
J Kotze
Negative Correlation
-0.04
1 player
Z Green
2 player
B Scholtz
No Correlation
-0.12
1 player
Z Green
2 player
N Davin
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
Z Green
2 player
D Wiese
No Correlation
-0.29
1 player
Z Green
2 player
R Trumpelmann
Weak Negative Correlation
0.22
1 player
Z Green
2 player
M van Lingen
Weak Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
Z Green
2 player
M Kruger
No Correlation
0.07
1 player
J Kotze
2 player
J Smit
No Correlation
0.16
1 player
J Kotze
2 player
J Frylinck
No Correlation
-0.47
1 player
J Kotze
2 player
G Merwe Erasmus
Negative Correlation
-0.6
1 player
J Kotze
2 player
Z Green
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
J Kotze
2 player
J Kotze
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.3
1 player
J Kotze
2 player
B Scholtz
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.38
1 player
J Kotze
2 player
N Davin
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.08
1 player
J Kotze
2 player
D Wiese
No Correlation
-0.17
1 player
J Kotze
2 player
R Trumpelmann
No Correlation
-0.38
1 player
J Kotze
2 player
M van Lingen
Weak Negative Correlation
0.06
1 player
J Kotze
2 player
M Kruger
No Correlation
-0.1
1 player
B Scholtz
2 player
J Smit
No Correlation
0
1 player
B Scholtz
2 player
J Frylinck
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
B Scholtz
2 player
G Merwe Erasmus
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.04
1 player
B Scholtz
2 player
Z Green
No Correlation
-0.3
1 player
B Scholtz
2 player
J Kotze
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
B Scholtz
2 player
B Scholtz
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.12
1 player
B Scholtz
2 player
N Davin
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
B Scholtz
2 player
D Wiese
Weak Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
B Scholtz
2 player
R Trumpelmann
Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
B Scholtz
2 player
M van Lingen
Weak Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
B Scholtz
2 player
M Kruger
No Correlation
0
1 player
N Davin
2 player
J Smit
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
N Davin
2 player
J Frylinck
Weak Negative Correlation
0.07
1 player
N Davin
2 player
G Merwe Erasmus
No Correlation
-0.12
1 player
N Davin
2 player
Z Green
No Correlation
-0.38
1 player
N Davin
2 player
J Kotze
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.12
1 player
N Davin
2 player
B Scholtz
No Correlation
1
1 player
N Davin
2 player
N Davin
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.54
1 player
N Davin
2 player
D Wiese
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
N Davin
2 player
R Trumpelmann
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
N Davin
2 player
M van Lingen
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
N Davin
2 player
M Kruger
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.08
1 player
D Wiese
2 player
J Smit
No Correlation
0.06
1 player
D Wiese
2 player
J Frylinck
No Correlation
0.29
1 player
D Wiese
2 player
G Merwe Erasmus
Weak Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
D Wiese
2 player
Z Green
No Correlation
-0.08
1 player
D Wiese
2 player
J Kotze
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
D Wiese
2 player
B Scholtz
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.54
1 player
D Wiese
2 player
N Davin
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
D Wiese
2 player
D Wiese
Strong Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
D Wiese
2 player
R Trumpelmann
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
D Wiese
2 player
M van Lingen
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
D Wiese
2 player
M Kruger
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
R Trumpelmann
2 player
J Smit
No Correlation
0.43
1 player
R Trumpelmann
2 player
J Frylinck
Positive Correlation
-0.11
1 player
R Trumpelmann
2 player
G Merwe Erasmus
No Correlation
-0.29
1 player
R Trumpelmann
2 player
Z Green
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.17
1 player
R Trumpelmann
2 player
J Kotze
No Correlation
0.43
1 player
R Trumpelmann
2 player
B Scholtz
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
R Trumpelmann
2 player
N Davin
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
R Trumpelmann
2 player
D Wiese
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
R Trumpelmann
2 player
R Trumpelmann
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
R Trumpelmann
2 player
M van Lingen
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.45
1 player
R Trumpelmann
2 player
M Kruger
Negative Correlation
0.22
1 player
M van Lingen
2 player
J Smit
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.29
1 player
M van Lingen
2 player
J Frylinck
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
M van Lingen
2 player
G Merwe Erasmus
No Correlation
0.22
1 player
M van Lingen
2 player
Z Green
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.38
1 player
M van Lingen
2 player
J Kotze
Weak Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
M van Lingen
2 player
B Scholtz
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
M van Lingen
2 player
N Davin
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
M van Lingen
2 player
D Wiese
No Correlation
-0.25
1 player
M van Lingen
2 player
R Trumpelmann
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
M van Lingen
2 player
M van Lingen
Strong Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
M van Lingen
2 player
M Kruger
Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
M Kruger
2 player
J Smit
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
M Kruger
2 player
J Frylinck
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
M Kruger
2 player
G Merwe Erasmus
Weak Negative Correlation
0.08
1 player
M Kruger
2 player
Z Green
No Correlation
0.06
1 player
M Kruger
2 player
J Kotze
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
M Kruger
2 player
B Scholtz
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
M Kruger
2 player
N Davin
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
M Kruger
2 player
D Wiese
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.45
1 player
M Kruger
2 player
R Trumpelmann
Negative Correlation
0.43
1 player
M Kruger
2 player
M van Lingen
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M Kruger
2 player
M Kruger
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

No data found

Pick Z Green and J Kotze together
Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 G Merwe Erasmus

AR
Similar Perfomance
D Wiese 0.29
J Smit 0.2
B Scholtz 0.2
Z Green 0.1
N Davin 0.07
Opposite Perfomance
J Kotze -0.47
M Kruger -0.33
J Frylinck -0.16
R Trumpelmann -0.11

2 B Scholtz

BOW
Similar Perfomance
R Trumpelmann 0.43
D Wiese 0.33
M van Lingen 0.33
G Merwe Erasmus 0.2
M Kruger 0.08
Opposite Perfomance
J Kotze -0.3
N Davin -0.12
J Smit -0.1
Z Green -0.04

3 J Frylinck

AR
Similar Perfomance
R Trumpelmann 0.43
J Smit 0.26
J Kotze 0.16
M Kruger 0.08
D Wiese 0.06
Opposite Perfomance
N Davin -0.33
M van Lingen -0.29
Z Green -0.25
G Merwe Erasmus -0.16

4 Z Green

WK
Similar Perfomance
M van Lingen 0.22
D Wiese 0.11
J Smit 0.1
G Merwe Erasmus 0.1
M Kruger 0.08
Opposite Perfomance
J Kotze -0.6
R Trumpelmann -0.29
J Frylinck -0.25
N Davin -0.12
B Scholtz -0.04

5 D Wiese

AR
Similar Perfomance
B Scholtz 0.33
G Merwe Erasmus 0.29
R Trumpelmann 0.2
Z Green 0.11
J Frylinck 0.06
Opposite Perfomance
N Davin -0.54
M Kruger -0.33
J Smit -0.08
J Kotze -0.08

PerfectLineup © 2024. All Rights Reserved