DMP 25 Apr 09:30 pm EQA

Lineup Out

Enmore Cricket Ground
Guyana T10 Blast

Best Player Combinations For
DMP vs EQA

How it Works?

This guide is super useful for identifying player combinations that are likely to score big. Use the filters to identify the best player combinations according to specific match scenarios.

Player correlate positively

Both players generally perform similarly when picked together. They either score high together or score low together. Maximise FPts by picking players that correlate positively with top players.

Player correlate negatively

Both players generally perform in an opposite manner. If one player scores high, the other usually scores low. Avoid picking players that correlate negatively with top player

Show Player Combinations on the basis of:

Best DMP Player Combinations

Best DMP Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad
J Sinclair BOW DMP
G Chulai BOW DMP
L Swamy BOW DMP
K Sinclair BOW DMP
J Scott AR DMP
J Rampersaud AR DMP
C Barnwell AR DMP
M Hubbard BAT DMP
J Campbell WK DMP
S Singh BAT DMP
D Vantull BAT DMP
J Sinclair
G Chulai
L Swamy
K Sinclair
J Scott
J Rampersaud
C Barnwell
M Hubbard
J Campbell
S Singh
D Vantull
1
1 player
J Sinclair
2 player
J Sinclair
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.1
1 player
J Sinclair
2 player
G Chulai
No Correlation
0.24
1 player
J Sinclair
2 player
L Swamy
Weak Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
J Sinclair
2 player
K Sinclair
Weak Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
J Sinclair
2 player
J Scott
No Correlation
0.31
1 player
J Sinclair
2 player
J Rampersaud
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
J Sinclair
2 player
C Barnwell
Weak Positive Correlation
0.01
1 player
J Sinclair
2 player
M Hubbard
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
J Sinclair
2 player
J Campbell
No Correlation
0.56
1 player
J Sinclair
2 player
S Singh
Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
J Sinclair
2 player
D Vantull
No Correlation
-0.1
1 player
G Chulai
2 player
J Sinclair
No Correlation
1
1 player
G Chulai
2 player
G Chulai
Strong Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
G Chulai
2 player
L Swamy
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.38
1 player
G Chulai
2 player
K Sinclair
Weak Negative Correlation
0.62
1 player
G Chulai
2 player
J Scott
Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
G Chulai
2 player
J Rampersaud
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.28
1 player
G Chulai
2 player
C Barnwell
Weak Negative Correlation
0.77
1 player
G Chulai
2 player
M Hubbard
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
G Chulai
2 player
J Campbell
Strong Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
G Chulai
2 player
S Singh
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
G Chulai
2 player
D Vantull
Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
L Swamy
2 player
J Sinclair
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
L Swamy
2 player
G Chulai
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
L Swamy
2 player
L Swamy
Strong Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
L Swamy
2 player
K Sinclair
Weak Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
L Swamy
2 player
J Scott
Weak Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
L Swamy
2 player
J Rampersaud
Weak Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
L Swamy
2 player
C Barnwell
Weak Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
L Swamy
2 player
M Hubbard
Weak Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
L Swamy
2 player
J Campbell
No Correlation
0.1
1 player
L Swamy
2 player
S Singh
No Correlation
0.19
1 player
L Swamy
2 player
D Vantull
No Correlation
0.39
1 player
K Sinclair
2 player
J Sinclair
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.38
1 player
K Sinclair
2 player
G Chulai
Weak Negative Correlation
0.35
1 player
K Sinclair
2 player
L Swamy
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
K Sinclair
2 player
K Sinclair
Strong Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
K Sinclair
2 player
J Scott
Weak Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
K Sinclair
2 player
J Rampersaud
No Correlation
0.41
1 player
K Sinclair
2 player
C Barnwell
Positive Correlation
-0.18
1 player
K Sinclair
2 player
M Hubbard
No Correlation
-0.08
1 player
K Sinclair
2 player
J Campbell
No Correlation
0.34
1 player
K Sinclair
2 player
S Singh
Weak Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
K Sinclair
2 player
D Vantull
Weak Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
J Scott
2 player
J Sinclair
No Correlation
0.62
1 player
J Scott
2 player
G Chulai
Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
J Scott
2 player
L Swamy
Weak Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
J Scott
2 player
K Sinclair
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
J Scott
2 player
J Scott
Strong Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
J Scott
2 player
J Rampersaud
Weak Positive Correlation
0.01
1 player
J Scott
2 player
C Barnwell
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
J Scott
2 player
M Hubbard
Positive Correlation
0.52
1 player
J Scott
2 player
J Campbell
Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
J Scott
2 player
S Singh
Weak Positive Correlation
0.49
1 player
J Scott
2 player
D Vantull
Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
J Rampersaud
2 player
J Sinclair
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
J Rampersaud
2 player
G Chulai
Weak Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
J Rampersaud
2 player
L Swamy
Weak Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
J Rampersaud
2 player
K Sinclair
No Correlation
0.3
1 player
J Rampersaud
2 player
J Scott
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
J Rampersaud
2 player
J Rampersaud
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.17
1 player
J Rampersaud
2 player
C Barnwell
No Correlation
0.26
1 player
J Rampersaud
2 player
M Hubbard
Weak Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
J Rampersaud
2 player
J Campbell
Weak Positive Correlation
0.41
1 player
J Rampersaud
2 player
S Singh
Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
J Rampersaud
2 player
D Vantull
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
C Barnwell
2 player
J Sinclair
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.28
1 player
C Barnwell
2 player
G Chulai
Weak Negative Correlation
0.21
1 player
C Barnwell
2 player
L Swamy
Weak Positive Correlation
0.41
1 player
C Barnwell
2 player
K Sinclair
Positive Correlation
0.01
1 player
C Barnwell
2 player
J Scott
No Correlation
-0.17
1 player
C Barnwell
2 player
J Rampersaud
No Correlation
1
1 player
C Barnwell
2 player
C Barnwell
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.31
1 player
C Barnwell
2 player
M Hubbard
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.58
1 player
C Barnwell
2 player
J Campbell
Negative Correlation
0.15
1 player
C Barnwell
2 player
S Singh
No Correlation
0.21
1 player
C Barnwell
2 player
D Vantull
Weak Positive Correlation
0.01
1 player
M Hubbard
2 player
J Sinclair
No Correlation
0.77
1 player
M Hubbard
2 player
G Chulai
Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
M Hubbard
2 player
L Swamy
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.18
1 player
M Hubbard
2 player
K Sinclair
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
M Hubbard
2 player
J Scott
Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
M Hubbard
2 player
J Rampersaud
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.31
1 player
M Hubbard
2 player
C Barnwell
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
M Hubbard
2 player
M Hubbard
Strong Positive Correlation
0.54
1 player
M Hubbard
2 player
J Campbell
Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
M Hubbard
2 player
S Singh
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
M Hubbard
2 player
D Vantull
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
J Campbell
2 player
J Sinclair
No Correlation
1
1 player
J Campbell
2 player
G Chulai
Strong Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
J Campbell
2 player
L Swamy
No Correlation
-0.08
1 player
J Campbell
2 player
K Sinclair
No Correlation
0.52
1 player
J Campbell
2 player
J Scott
Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
J Campbell
2 player
J Rampersaud
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.58
1 player
J Campbell
2 player
C Barnwell
Negative Correlation
0.54
1 player
J Campbell
2 player
M Hubbard
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
J Campbell
2 player
J Campbell
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
J Campbell
2 player
S Singh
No Correlation
0.56
1 player
J Campbell
2 player
D Vantull
Positive Correlation
0.56
1 player
S Singh
2 player
J Sinclair
Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
S Singh
2 player
G Chulai
No Correlation
0.1
1 player
S Singh
2 player
L Swamy
No Correlation
0.34
1 player
S Singh
2 player
K Sinclair
Weak Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
S Singh
2 player
J Scott
Weak Positive Correlation
0.41
1 player
S Singh
2 player
J Rampersaud
Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
S Singh
2 player
C Barnwell
No Correlation
0.09
1 player
S Singh
2 player
M Hubbard
No Correlation
0
1 player
S Singh
2 player
J Campbell
No Correlation
1
1 player
S Singh
2 player
S Singh
Strong Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
S Singh
2 player
D Vantull
Weak Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
D Vantull
2 player
J Sinclair
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
D Vantull
2 player
G Chulai
Positive Correlation
0.19
1 player
D Vantull
2 player
L Swamy
No Correlation
0.34
1 player
D Vantull
2 player
K Sinclair
Weak Positive Correlation
0.49
1 player
D Vantull
2 player
J Scott
Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
D Vantull
2 player
J Rampersaud
Weak Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
D Vantull
2 player
C Barnwell
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
D Vantull
2 player
M Hubbard
Weak Positive Correlation
0.56
1 player
D Vantull
2 player
J Campbell
Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
D Vantull
2 player
S Singh
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
D Vantull
2 player
D Vantull
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick G Chulai and J Scott together
Positive Correlation

Pick G Chulai and M Hubbard together
Positive Correlation

Pick G Chulai and J Campbell together
Strong Positive Correlation

High Performing Players

1 C Barnwell

AR
Similar Perfomance
K Sinclair 0.41
J Sinclair 0.35
L Swamy 0.21
D Vantull 0.21
S Singh 0.15
J Scott 0.01
Opposite Perfomance
J Campbell -0.58
M Hubbard -0.31
G Chulai -0.28
J Rampersaud -0.17

2 J Sinclair

BOW
Similar Perfomance
S Singh 0.56
K Sinclair 0.39
C Barnwell 0.35
J Rampersaud 0.31
L Swamy 0.24
J Scott 0.18
D Vantull 0.12
M Hubbard 0.01
Opposite Perfomance
J Campbell -0.14
G Chulai -0.1

3 K Sinclair

BOW
Similar Perfomance
C Barnwell 0.41
J Sinclair 0.39
L Swamy 0.35
S Singh 0.34
D Vantull 0.34
J Scott 0.24
J Rampersaud 0.07
Opposite Perfomance
G Chulai -0.38
M Hubbard -0.18
J Campbell -0.08

4 D Vantull

BAT
Similar Perfomance
J Campbell 0.56
J Scott 0.49
G Chulai 0.42
K Sinclair 0.34
M Hubbard 0.28
S Singh 0.28
J Rampersaud 0.26
C Barnwell 0.21
L Swamy 0.19
J Sinclair 0.12

5 L Swamy

BOW
Similar Perfomance
J Scott 0.39
K Sinclair 0.35
G Chulai 0.28
J Rampersaud 0.26
M Hubbard 0.26
J Sinclair 0.24
C Barnwell 0.21
D Vantull 0.19
S Singh 0.1
J Campbell 0.08

Best EQA Player Combinations

Best EQA Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad
Anthony Adams AR EQA
J Foo BAT EQA
Q Torrington BOW EQA
R Perez BAT EQA
T Lovell BOW EQA
J Jones BOW EQA
A Ramsammy BAT EQA
K Mickle BAT EQA
U Balgobin BAT EQA
K Boodie WK EQA
Anthony Adams
J Foo
Q Torrington
R Perez
T Lovell
J Jones
A Ramsammy
K Mickle
U Balgobin
K Boodie
1
1 player
Anthony Adams
2 player
Anthony Adams
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.4
1 player
Anthony Adams
2 player
J Foo
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.02
1 player
Anthony Adams
2 player
Q Torrington
No Correlation
0.64
1 player
Anthony Adams
2 player
R Perez
Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
Anthony Adams
2 player
T Lovell
Weak Positive Correlation
0.02
1 player
Anthony Adams
2 player
J Jones
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
Anthony Adams
2 player
A Ramsammy
Weak Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
Anthony Adams
2 player
K Mickle
Weak Positive Correlation
0.45
1 player
Anthony Adams
2 player
U Balgobin
Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
Anthony Adams
2 player
K Boodie
No Correlation
-0.4
1 player
J Foo
2 player
Anthony Adams
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
J Foo
2 player
J Foo
Strong Positive Correlation
1
1 player
J Foo
2 player
Q Torrington
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.4
1 player
J Foo
2 player
R Perez
Weak Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
J Foo
2 player
T Lovell
Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
J Foo
2 player
J Jones
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
J Foo
2 player
A Ramsammy
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
J Foo
2 player
K Mickle
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
J Foo
2 player
U Balgobin
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
J Foo
2 player
K Boodie
Positive Correlation
-0.02
1 player
Q Torrington
2 player
Anthony Adams
No Correlation
1
1 player
Q Torrington
2 player
J Foo
Strong Positive Correlation
1
1 player
Q Torrington
2 player
Q Torrington
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.1
1 player
Q Torrington
2 player
R Perez
No Correlation
0.3
1 player
Q Torrington
2 player
T Lovell
Weak Positive Correlation
0.03
1 player
Q Torrington
2 player
J Jones
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
Q Torrington
2 player
A Ramsammy
Positive Correlation
0.58
1 player
Q Torrington
2 player
K Mickle
Positive Correlation
-0.06
1 player
Q Torrington
2 player
U Balgobin
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
Q Torrington
2 player
K Boodie
Weak Positive Correlation
0.64
1 player
R Perez
2 player
Anthony Adams
Positive Correlation
-0.4
1 player
R Perez
2 player
J Foo
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.1
1 player
R Perez
2 player
Q Torrington
No Correlation
1
1 player
R Perez
2 player
R Perez
Strong Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
R Perez
2 player
T Lovell
Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
R Perez
2 player
J Jones
No Correlation
0.46
1 player
R Perez
2 player
A Ramsammy
Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
R Perez
2 player
K Mickle
No Correlation
0.39
1 player
R Perez
2 player
U Balgobin
Weak Positive Correlation
0.41
1 player
R Perez
2 player
K Boodie
Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
T Lovell
2 player
Anthony Adams
Weak Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
T Lovell
2 player
J Foo
Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
T Lovell
2 player
Q Torrington
Weak Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
T Lovell
2 player
R Perez
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
T Lovell
2 player
T Lovell
Strong Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
T Lovell
2 player
J Jones
Weak Positive Correlation
0.48
1 player
T Lovell
2 player
A Ramsammy
Positive Correlation
0.51
1 player
T Lovell
2 player
K Mickle
Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
T Lovell
2 player
U Balgobin
Weak Positive Correlation
0.59
1 player
T Lovell
2 player
K Boodie
Positive Correlation
0.02
1 player
J Jones
2 player
Anthony Adams
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
J Jones
2 player
J Foo
Positive Correlation
0.03
1 player
J Jones
2 player
Q Torrington
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
J Jones
2 player
R Perez
No Correlation
0.34
1 player
J Jones
2 player
T Lovell
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
J Jones
2 player
J Jones
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.08
1 player
J Jones
2 player
A Ramsammy
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
J Jones
2 player
K Mickle
Positive Correlation
0.82
1 player
J Jones
2 player
U Balgobin
Strong Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
J Jones
2 player
K Boodie
Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
A Ramsammy
2 player
Anthony Adams
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
A Ramsammy
2 player
J Foo
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
A Ramsammy
2 player
Q Torrington
Positive Correlation
0.46
1 player
A Ramsammy
2 player
R Perez
Positive Correlation
0.48
1 player
A Ramsammy
2 player
T Lovell
Positive Correlation
-0.08
1 player
A Ramsammy
2 player
J Jones
No Correlation
1
1 player
A Ramsammy
2 player
A Ramsammy
Strong Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
A Ramsammy
2 player
K Mickle
Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
A Ramsammy
2 player
U Balgobin
Weak Positive Correlation
0.45
1 player
A Ramsammy
2 player
K Boodie
Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
K Mickle
2 player
Anthony Adams
Weak Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
K Mickle
2 player
J Foo
Positive Correlation
0.58
1 player
K Mickle
2 player
Q Torrington
Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
K Mickle
2 player
R Perez
No Correlation
0.51
1 player
K Mickle
2 player
T Lovell
Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
K Mickle
2 player
J Jones
Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
K Mickle
2 player
A Ramsammy
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
K Mickle
2 player
K Mickle
Strong Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
K Mickle
2 player
U Balgobin
Positive Correlation
0.48
1 player
K Mickle
2 player
K Boodie
Positive Correlation
0.45
1 player
U Balgobin
2 player
Anthony Adams
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
U Balgobin
2 player
J Foo
No Correlation
-0.06
1 player
U Balgobin
2 player
Q Torrington
No Correlation
0.39
1 player
U Balgobin
2 player
R Perez
Weak Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
U Balgobin
2 player
T Lovell
Weak Positive Correlation
0.82
1 player
U Balgobin
2 player
J Jones
Strong Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
U Balgobin
2 player
A Ramsammy
Weak Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
U Balgobin
2 player
K Mickle
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
U Balgobin
2 player
U Balgobin
Strong Positive Correlation
0.51
1 player
U Balgobin
2 player
K Boodie
Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
K Boodie
2 player
Anthony Adams
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
K Boodie
2 player
J Foo
Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
K Boodie
2 player
Q Torrington
Weak Positive Correlation
0.41
1 player
K Boodie
2 player
R Perez
Positive Correlation
0.59
1 player
K Boodie
2 player
T Lovell
Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
K Boodie
2 player
J Jones
Positive Correlation
0.45
1 player
K Boodie
2 player
A Ramsammy
Positive Correlation
0.48
1 player
K Boodie
2 player
K Mickle
Positive Correlation
0.51
1 player
K Boodie
2 player
U Balgobin
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
K Boodie
2 player
K Boodie
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick Anthony Adams and R Perez together
Positive Correlation

Pick J Foo and Q Torrington together
Strong Positive Correlation

Pick J Foo and T Lovell together
Positive Correlation

Pick J Foo and K Mickle together
Positive Correlation

Pick J Jones and U Balgobin together
Strong Positive Correlation

High Performing Players

1 Anthony Adams

AR
Similar Perfomance
R Perez 0.64
U Balgobin 0.45
A Ramsammy 0.35
T Lovell 0.21
K Mickle 0.21
K Boodie 0.09
J Jones 0.02
Opposite Perfomance
J Foo -0.4
Q Torrington -0.02

2 A Ramsammy

BAT
Similar Perfomance
Q Torrington 0.5
T Lovell 0.48
R Perez 0.46
K Boodie 0.45
K Mickle 0.4
Anthony Adams 0.35
U Balgobin 0.35
Opposite Perfomance
J Jones -0.08

3 Q Torrington

BOW
Similar Perfomance
J Foo 1
K Mickle 0.58
A Ramsammy 0.5
T Lovell 0.3
K Boodie 0.28
J Jones 0.03
Opposite Perfomance
R Perez -0.1
U Balgobin -0.06
Anthony Adams -0.02

4 K Mickle

BAT
Similar Perfomance
J Foo 0.7
Q Torrington 0.58
T Lovell 0.51
K Boodie 0.48
J Jones 0.42
A Ramsammy 0.4
U Balgobin 0.4
Anthony Adams 0.21
R Perez 0.1

5 R Perez

BAT
Similar Perfomance
Anthony Adams 0.64
A Ramsammy 0.46
T Lovell 0.42
K Boodie 0.41
U Balgobin 0.39
K Mickle 0.1
Opposite Perfomance
J Foo -0.4
J Jones -0.14
Q Torrington -0.1

Best DMP Player Combinations

Best DMP Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad
J Sinclair BOW DMP
G Chulai BOW DMP
L Swamy BOW DMP
K Sinclair BOW DMP
J Scott AR DMP
J Rampersaud AR DMP
C Barnwell AR DMP
M Hubbard BAT DMP
J Campbell WK DMP
S Singh BAT DMP
D Vantull BAT DMP
J Sinclair
G Chulai
L Swamy
K Sinclair
J Scott
J Rampersaud
C Barnwell
M Hubbard
J Campbell
S Singh
D Vantull
1
1 player
J Sinclair
2 player
J Sinclair
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
J Sinclair
2 player
G Chulai
Negative Correlation
-0.25
1 player
J Sinclair
2 player
L Swamy
Weak Negative Correlation
0.25
1 player
J Sinclair
2 player
K Sinclair
Weak Positive Correlation
-1
1 player
J Sinclair
2 player
J Scott
Strong Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
J Sinclair
2 player
J Rampersaud
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
J Sinclair
2 player
C Barnwell
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
J Sinclair
2 player
M Hubbard
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.42
1 player
J Sinclair
2 player
J Campbell
Negative Correlation
0.25
1 player
J Sinclair
2 player
S Singh
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.5
1 player
J Sinclair
2 player
D Vantull
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
G Chulai
2 player
J Sinclair
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
G Chulai
2 player
G Chulai
Strong Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
G Chulai
2 player
L Swamy
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
G Chulai
2 player
K Sinclair
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
G Chulai
2 player
J Scott
Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
G Chulai
2 player
J Rampersaud
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
G Chulai
2 player
C Barnwell
Weak Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
G Chulai
2 player
M Hubbard
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
G Chulai
2 player
J Campbell
Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
G Chulai
2 player
S Singh
Weak Negative Correlation
0.35
1 player
G Chulai
2 player
D Vantull
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
L Swamy
2 player
J Sinclair
Weak Negative Correlation
0.35
1 player
L Swamy
2 player
G Chulai
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
L Swamy
2 player
L Swamy
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
L Swamy
2 player
K Sinclair
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
L Swamy
2 player
J Scott
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
L Swamy
2 player
J Rampersaud
No Correlation
0
1 player
L Swamy
2 player
C Barnwell
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
L Swamy
2 player
M Hubbard
Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
L Swamy
2 player
J Campbell
No Correlation
0
1 player
L Swamy
2 player
S Singh
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
L Swamy
2 player
D Vantull
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
K Sinclair
2 player
J Sinclair
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
K Sinclair
2 player
G Chulai
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
K Sinclair
2 player
L Swamy
No Correlation
1
1 player
K Sinclair
2 player
K Sinclair
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
K Sinclair
2 player
J Scott
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.71
1 player
K Sinclair
2 player
J Rampersaud
Negative Correlation
0.5
1 player
K Sinclair
2 player
C Barnwell
Positive Correlation
-0.5
1 player
K Sinclair
2 player
M Hubbard
Negative Correlation
-0.42
1 player
K Sinclair
2 player
J Campbell
Negative Correlation
0.5
1 player
K Sinclair
2 player
S Singh
Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
K Sinclair
2 player
D Vantull
Weak Negative Correlation
-1
1 player
J Scott
2 player
J Sinclair
Strong Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
J Scott
2 player
G Chulai
Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
J Scott
2 player
L Swamy
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
J Scott
2 player
K Sinclair
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
J Scott
2 player
J Scott
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
J Scott
2 player
J Rampersaud
No Correlation
-0.25
1 player
J Scott
2 player
C Barnwell
Weak Negative Correlation
0.25
1 player
J Scott
2 player
M Hubbard
Weak Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
J Scott
2 player
J Campbell
Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
J Scott
2 player
S Singh
Weak Negative Correlation
0.5
1 player
J Scott
2 player
D Vantull
Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
J Rampersaud
2 player
J Sinclair
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
J Rampersaud
2 player
G Chulai
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
J Rampersaud
2 player
L Swamy
No Correlation
-0.71
1 player
J Rampersaud
2 player
K Sinclair
Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
J Rampersaud
2 player
J Scott
No Correlation
1
1 player
J Rampersaud
2 player
J Rampersaud
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.43
1 player
J Rampersaud
2 player
C Barnwell
Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
J Rampersaud
2 player
M Hubbard
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
J Rampersaud
2 player
J Campbell
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
J Rampersaud
2 player
S Singh
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
J Rampersaud
2 player
D Vantull
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
C Barnwell
2 player
J Sinclair
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
C Barnwell
2 player
G Chulai
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
C Barnwell
2 player
L Swamy
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
C Barnwell
2 player
K Sinclair
Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
C Barnwell
2 player
J Scott
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.43
1 player
C Barnwell
2 player
J Rampersaud
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
C Barnwell
2 player
C Barnwell
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.5
1 player
C Barnwell
2 player
M Hubbard
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
C Barnwell
2 player
J Campbell
Negative Correlation
0.5
1 player
C Barnwell
2 player
S Singh
Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
C Barnwell
2 player
D Vantull
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.25
1 player
M Hubbard
2 player
J Sinclair
Weak Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Hubbard
2 player
G Chulai
Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
M Hubbard
2 player
L Swamy
Positive Correlation
-0.5
1 player
M Hubbard
2 player
K Sinclair
Negative Correlation
0.25
1 player
M Hubbard
2 player
J Scott
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
M Hubbard
2 player
J Rampersaud
No Correlation
-0.5
1 player
M Hubbard
2 player
C Barnwell
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
M Hubbard
2 player
M Hubbard
Strong Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
M Hubbard
2 player
J Campbell
Positive Correlation
-0.5
1 player
M Hubbard
2 player
S Singh
Negative Correlation
0.25
1 player
M Hubbard
2 player
D Vantull
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.42
1 player
J Campbell
2 player
J Sinclair
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
J Campbell
2 player
G Chulai
Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
J Campbell
2 player
L Swamy
No Correlation
-0.42
1 player
J Campbell
2 player
K Sinclair
Negative Correlation
0.42
1 player
J Campbell
2 player
J Scott
Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
J Campbell
2 player
J Rampersaud
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
J Campbell
2 player
C Barnwell
Negative Correlation
0.42
1 player
J Campbell
2 player
M Hubbard
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
J Campbell
2 player
J Campbell
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.42
1 player
J Campbell
2 player
S Singh
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
J Campbell
2 player
D Vantull
Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
S Singh
2 player
J Sinclair
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
S Singh
2 player
G Chulai
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
S Singh
2 player
L Swamy
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
S Singh
2 player
K Sinclair
Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
S Singh
2 player
J Scott
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
S Singh
2 player
J Rampersaud
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
S Singh
2 player
C Barnwell
Positive Correlation
-0.5
1 player
S Singh
2 player
M Hubbard
Negative Correlation
-0.42
1 player
S Singh
2 player
J Campbell
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
S Singh
2 player
S Singh
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
S Singh
2 player
D Vantull
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.5
1 player
D Vantull
2 player
J Sinclair
Negative Correlation
0.35
1 player
D Vantull
2 player
G Chulai
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
D Vantull
2 player
L Swamy
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
D Vantull
2 player
K Sinclair
Weak Negative Correlation
0.5
1 player
D Vantull
2 player
J Scott
Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
D Vantull
2 player
J Rampersaud
No Correlation
-0.25
1 player
D Vantull
2 player
C Barnwell
Weak Negative Correlation
0.25
1 player
D Vantull
2 player
M Hubbard
Weak Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
D Vantull
2 player
J Campbell
Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
D Vantull
2 player
S Singh
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
D Vantull
2 player
D Vantull
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick J Campbell and D Vantull together
Positive Correlation

Pick J Sinclair and G Chulai together
Negative Correlation

Pick J Sinclair and J Scott together
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick G Chulai and K Sinclair together
Negative Correlation

Pick K Sinclair and J Rampersaud together
Negative Correlation

Pick C Barnwell and J Campbell together
Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 C Barnwell

AR
Similar Perfomance
S Singh 0.5
K Sinclair 0.5
J Sinclair 0.25
Opposite Perfomance
J Campbell -0.7
M Hubbard -0.5
J Rampersaud -0.43
G Chulai -0.35
J Scott -0.25
D Vantull -0.25

2 K Sinclair

BOW
Similar Perfomance
S Singh 0.5
C Barnwell 0.5
J Sinclair 0.25
Opposite Perfomance
J Rampersaud -0.71
G Chulai -0.7
M Hubbard -0.5
J Campbell -0.42
J Scott -0.25
D Vantull -0.25

3 S Singh

BAT
Similar Perfomance
C Barnwell 0.5
K Sinclair 0.5
J Sinclair 0.25
Opposite Perfomance
M Hubbard -0.5
J Campbell -0.42
G Chulai -0.35
J Scott -0.25
D Vantull -0.25
J Rampersaud -0.14

4 J Sinclair

BOW
Similar Perfomance
K Sinclair 0.25
C Barnwell 0.25
S Singh 0.25
J Rampersaud 0.14
Opposite Perfomance
J Scott -1
G Chulai -0.7
D Vantull -0.5
J Campbell -0.42
L Swamy -0.25
M Hubbard -0.25

5 L Swamy

BOW
Similar Perfomance
M Hubbard 0.5
G Chulai 0.35
J Scott 0.25
D Vantull 0.25
J Rampersaud 0.14
J Campbell 0.14
Opposite Perfomance
J Sinclair -0.25

Best EQA Player Combinations

Best EQA Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad
Anthony Adams AR EQA
J Foo BAT EQA
Q Torrington BOW EQA
R Perez BAT EQA
T Lovell BOW EQA
J Jones BOW EQA
A Ramsammy BAT EQA
K Mickle BAT EQA
U Balgobin BAT EQA
K Boodie WK EQA
Anthony Adams
J Foo
Q Torrington
R Perez
T Lovell
J Jones
A Ramsammy
K Mickle
U Balgobin
K Boodie
1
1 player
Anthony Adams
2 player
Anthony Adams
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
Anthony Adams
2 player
J Foo
Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
Anthony Adams
2 player
Q Torrington
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
Anthony Adams
2 player
R Perez
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
Anthony Adams
2 player
T Lovell
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
Anthony Adams
2 player
J Jones
No Correlation
-0.25
1 player
Anthony Adams
2 player
A Ramsammy
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
Anthony Adams
2 player
K Mickle
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
Anthony Adams
2 player
U Balgobin
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
Anthony Adams
2 player
K Boodie
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
J Foo
2 player
Anthony Adams
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
J Foo
2 player
J Foo
Strong Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
J Foo
2 player
Q Torrington
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
J Foo
2 player
R Perez
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
J Foo
2 player
T Lovell
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
J Foo
2 player
J Jones
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
J Foo
2 player
A Ramsammy
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
J Foo
2 player
K Mickle
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
J Foo
2 player
U Balgobin
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
J Foo
2 player
K Boodie
Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
Q Torrington
2 player
Anthony Adams
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
Q Torrington
2 player
J Foo
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
Q Torrington
2 player
Q Torrington
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
Q Torrington
2 player
R Perez
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
Q Torrington
2 player
T Lovell
No Correlation
0
1 player
Q Torrington
2 player
J Jones
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
Q Torrington
2 player
A Ramsammy
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
Q Torrington
2 player
K Mickle
Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
Q Torrington
2 player
U Balgobin
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
Q Torrington
2 player
K Boodie
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
R Perez
2 player
Anthony Adams
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
R Perez
2 player
J Foo
Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
R Perez
2 player
Q Torrington
No Correlation
1
1 player
R Perez
2 player
R Perez
Strong Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
R Perez
2 player
T Lovell
Positive Correlation
-0.42
1 player
R Perez
2 player
J Jones
Negative Correlation
0.25
1 player
R Perez
2 player
A Ramsammy
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
R Perez
2 player
K Mickle
No Correlation
-0.25
1 player
R Perez
2 player
U Balgobin
Weak Negative Correlation
0.25
1 player
R Perez
2 player
K Boodie
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
T Lovell
2 player
Anthony Adams
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
T Lovell
2 player
J Foo
Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
T Lovell
2 player
Q Torrington
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
T Lovell
2 player
R Perez
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
T Lovell
2 player
T Lovell
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
T Lovell
2 player
J Jones
No Correlation
0.75
1 player
T Lovell
2 player
A Ramsammy
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
T Lovell
2 player
K Mickle
No Correlation
-0.25
1 player
T Lovell
2 player
U Balgobin
Weak Negative Correlation
0.25
1 player
T Lovell
2 player
K Boodie
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
J Jones
2 player
Anthony Adams
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
J Jones
2 player
J Foo
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
J Jones
2 player
Q Torrington
No Correlation
-0.42
1 player
J Jones
2 player
R Perez
Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
J Jones
2 player
T Lovell
No Correlation
1
1 player
J Jones
2 player
J Jones
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.42
1 player
J Jones
2 player
A Ramsammy
Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
J Jones
2 player
K Mickle
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
J Jones
2 player
U Balgobin
Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
J Jones
2 player
K Boodie
No Correlation
-0.25
1 player
A Ramsammy
2 player
Anthony Adams
Weak Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
A Ramsammy
2 player
J Foo
Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
A Ramsammy
2 player
Q Torrington
Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
A Ramsammy
2 player
R Perez
Weak Positive Correlation
0.75
1 player
A Ramsammy
2 player
T Lovell
Positive Correlation
-0.42
1 player
A Ramsammy
2 player
J Jones
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
A Ramsammy
2 player
A Ramsammy
Strong Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
A Ramsammy
2 player
K Mickle
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.5
1 player
A Ramsammy
2 player
U Balgobin
Negative Correlation
0.5
1 player
A Ramsammy
2 player
K Boodie
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
K Mickle
2 player
Anthony Adams
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
K Mickle
2 player
J Foo
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
K Mickle
2 player
Q Torrington
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
K Mickle
2 player
R Perez
No Correlation
0
1 player
K Mickle
2 player
T Lovell
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
K Mickle
2 player
J Jones
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
K Mickle
2 player
A Ramsammy
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
K Mickle
2 player
K Mickle
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
K Mickle
2 player
U Balgobin
Weak Negative Correlation
0.25
1 player
K Mickle
2 player
K Boodie
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
U Balgobin
2 player
Anthony Adams
Weak Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
U Balgobin
2 player
J Foo
Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
U Balgobin
2 player
Q Torrington
No Correlation
-0.25
1 player
U Balgobin
2 player
R Perez
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.25
1 player
U Balgobin
2 player
T Lovell
Weak Negative Correlation
0.42
1 player
U Balgobin
2 player
J Jones
Positive Correlation
-0.5
1 player
U Balgobin
2 player
A Ramsammy
Negative Correlation
-0.25
1 player
U Balgobin
2 player
K Mickle
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
U Balgobin
2 player
U Balgobin
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
U Balgobin
2 player
K Boodie
No Correlation
-0.25
1 player
K Boodie
2 player
Anthony Adams
Weak Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
K Boodie
2 player
J Foo
Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
K Boodie
2 player
Q Torrington
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
K Boodie
2 player
R Perez
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
K Boodie
2 player
T Lovell
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
K Boodie
2 player
J Jones
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
K Boodie
2 player
A Ramsammy
Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
K Boodie
2 player
K Mickle
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
K Boodie
2 player
U Balgobin
No Correlation
1
1 player
K Boodie
2 player
K Boodie
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick J Foo and J Jones together
Positive Correlation

Pick J Foo and A Ramsammy together
Positive Correlation

Pick J Foo and U Balgobin together
Positive Correlation

Pick J Foo and K Boodie together
Positive Correlation

Pick Q Torrington and K Mickle together
Positive Correlation

Pick T Lovell and A Ramsammy together
Positive Correlation

Pick Anthony Adams and J Foo together
Negative Correlation

Pick J Foo and R Perez together
Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 Anthony Adams

AR
Similar Perfomance
R Perez 0.5
U Balgobin 0.25
Opposite Perfomance
J Foo -0.7
A Ramsammy -0.25
K Boodie -0.25
Q Torrington -0.14
J Jones -0.14

2 K Mickle

BAT
Similar Perfomance
J Foo 0.7
Q Torrington 0.7
A Ramsammy 0.25
K Boodie 0.25
J Jones 0.14
Opposite Perfomance
U Balgobin -0.25

3 A Ramsammy

BAT
Similar Perfomance
T Lovell 0.75
J Foo 0.7
K Boodie 0.5
Q Torrington 0.42
R Perez 0.25
K Mickle 0.25
Opposite Perfomance
U Balgobin -0.5
J Jones -0.42
Anthony Adams -0.25

4 K Boodie

WK
Similar Perfomance
J Foo 0.7
A Ramsammy 0.5
R Perez 0.25
T Lovell 0.25
K Mickle 0.25
Q Torrington 0.14
Opposite Perfomance
Anthony Adams -0.25
J Jones -0.14

5 U Balgobin

BAT
Similar Perfomance
J Foo 0.7
J Jones 0.42
Anthony Adams 0.25
Opposite Perfomance
A Ramsammy -0.5
T Lovell -0.25
R Perez -0.25
K Mickle -0.25
Q Torrington -0.14

PerfectLineup © 2024. All Rights Reserved