BFC 13 Jun 10:30 am CGD

Lineup Out

Ypsonas Cricket Ground
ECS T10 Cyprus

Best Player Combinations For
BFC vs CGD

How it Works?

This guide is super useful for identifying player combinations that are likely to score big. Use the filters to identify the best player combinations according to specific match scenarios.

Player correlate positively

Both players generally perform similarly when picked together. They either score high together or score low together. Maximise FPts by picking players that correlate positively with top players.

Player correlate negatively

Both players generally perform in an opposite manner. If one player scores high, the other usually scores low. Avoid picking players that correlate negatively with top player

Show Player Combinations on the basis of:

Best BFC Player Combinations

Best BFC Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad
S Burdekin AR BFC
S Thornton BOW BFC
B Dyson BAT BFC
Ed Sanderson AR BFC
W Miller BOW BFC
G Richardson BAT BFC
T Gregory BOW BFC
B Mortimore BOW BFC
L French BAT BFC
A Walbridge AR BFC
J Isidore WK BFC
S Burdekin
S Thornton
B Dyson
Ed Sanderson
W Miller
G Richardson
T Gregory
B Mortimore
L French
A Walbridge
J Isidore
1
1 player
S Burdekin
2 player
S Burdekin
Strong Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
S Burdekin
2 player
S Thornton
No Correlation
-0.38
1 player
S Burdekin
2 player
B Dyson
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
S Burdekin
2 player
Ed Sanderson
No Correlation
0.19
1 player
S Burdekin
2 player
W Miller
No Correlation
-0.23
1 player
S Burdekin
2 player
G Richardson
Weak Negative Correlation
0.36
1 player
S Burdekin
2 player
T Gregory
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
S Burdekin
2 player
B Mortimore
No Correlation
-0.2
1 player
S Burdekin
2 player
L French
No Correlation
0.6
1 player
S Burdekin
2 player
A Walbridge
Positive Correlation
0.46
1 player
S Burdekin
2 player
J Isidore
Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
S Thornton
2 player
S Burdekin
No Correlation
1
1 player
S Thornton
2 player
S Thornton
Strong Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
S Thornton
2 player
B Dyson
No Correlation
0.17
1 player
S Thornton
2 player
Ed Sanderson
No Correlation
0.45
1 player
S Thornton
2 player
W Miller
Positive Correlation
0.41
1 player
S Thornton
2 player
G Richardson
Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
S Thornton
2 player
T Gregory
Weak Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
S Thornton
2 player
B Mortimore
Weak Positive Correlation
0.82
1 player
S Thornton
2 player
L French
Strong Positive Correlation
0.05
1 player
S Thornton
2 player
A Walbridge
No Correlation
-0.02
1 player
S Thornton
2 player
J Isidore
No Correlation
-0.38
1 player
B Dyson
2 player
S Burdekin
Weak Negative Correlation
0.15
1 player
B Dyson
2 player
S Thornton
No Correlation
1
1 player
B Dyson
2 player
B Dyson
Strong Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
B Dyson
2 player
Ed Sanderson
Positive Correlation
-0.04
1 player
B Dyson
2 player
W Miller
No Correlation
0.88
1 player
B Dyson
2 player
G Richardson
Strong Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
B Dyson
2 player
T Gregory
No Correlation
0.82
1 player
B Dyson
2 player
B Mortimore
Strong Positive Correlation
0.85
1 player
B Dyson
2 player
L French
Strong Positive Correlation
0.06
1 player
B Dyson
2 player
A Walbridge
No Correlation
-0.08
1 player
B Dyson
2 player
J Isidore
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
Ed Sanderson
2 player
S Burdekin
No Correlation
0.17
1 player
Ed Sanderson
2 player
S Thornton
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
Ed Sanderson
2 player
B Dyson
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
Ed Sanderson
2 player
Ed Sanderson
Strong Positive Correlation
0.19
1 player
Ed Sanderson
2 player
W Miller
No Correlation
0.64
1 player
Ed Sanderson
2 player
G Richardson
Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
Ed Sanderson
2 player
T Gregory
Weak Positive Correlation
0.81
1 player
Ed Sanderson
2 player
B Mortimore
Strong Positive Correlation
0.69
1 player
Ed Sanderson
2 player
L French
Positive Correlation
-0.04
1 player
Ed Sanderson
2 player
A Walbridge
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
Ed Sanderson
2 player
J Isidore
No Correlation
0.19
1 player
W Miller
2 player
S Burdekin
No Correlation
0.45
1 player
W Miller
2 player
S Thornton
Positive Correlation
-0.04
1 player
W Miller
2 player
B Dyson
No Correlation
0.19
1 player
W Miller
2 player
Ed Sanderson
No Correlation
1
1 player
W Miller
2 player
W Miller
Strong Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
W Miller
2 player
G Richardson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.45
1 player
W Miller
2 player
T Gregory
Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
W Miller
2 player
B Mortimore
No Correlation
0.26
1 player
W Miller
2 player
L French
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
W Miller
2 player
A Walbridge
Weak Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
W Miller
2 player
J Isidore
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
G Richardson
2 player
S Burdekin
Weak Negative Correlation
0.41
1 player
G Richardson
2 player
S Thornton
Positive Correlation
0.88
1 player
G Richardson
2 player
B Dyson
Strong Positive Correlation
0.64
1 player
G Richardson
2 player
Ed Sanderson
Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
G Richardson
2 player
W Miller
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
G Richardson
2 player
G Richardson
Strong Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
G Richardson
2 player
T Gregory
No Correlation
0.8
1 player
G Richardson
2 player
B Mortimore
Strong Positive Correlation
0.9
1 player
G Richardson
2 player
L French
Strong Positive Correlation
0.16
1 player
G Richardson
2 player
A Walbridge
No Correlation
-0.12
1 player
G Richardson
2 player
J Isidore
No Correlation
0.36
1 player
T Gregory
2 player
S Burdekin
Weak Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
T Gregory
2 player
S Thornton
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
T Gregory
2 player
B Dyson
No Correlation
0.22
1 player
T Gregory
2 player
Ed Sanderson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.45
1 player
T Gregory
2 player
W Miller
Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
T Gregory
2 player
G Richardson
No Correlation
1
1 player
T Gregory
2 player
T Gregory
Strong Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
T Gregory
2 player
B Mortimore
Weak Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
T Gregory
2 player
L French
Weak Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
T Gregory
2 player
A Walbridge
Weak Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
T Gregory
2 player
J Isidore
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
B Mortimore
2 player
S Burdekin
No Correlation
0.36
1 player
B Mortimore
2 player
S Thornton
Weak Positive Correlation
0.82
1 player
B Mortimore
2 player
B Dyson
Strong Positive Correlation
0.81
1 player
B Mortimore
2 player
Ed Sanderson
Strong Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
B Mortimore
2 player
W Miller
No Correlation
0.8
1 player
B Mortimore
2 player
G Richardson
Strong Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
B Mortimore
2 player
T Gregory
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
B Mortimore
2 player
B Mortimore
Strong Positive Correlation
0.78
1 player
B Mortimore
2 player
L French
Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
B Mortimore
2 player
A Walbridge
Weak Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
B Mortimore
2 player
J Isidore
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.2
1 player
L French
2 player
S Burdekin
No Correlation
0.82
1 player
L French
2 player
S Thornton
Strong Positive Correlation
0.85
1 player
L French
2 player
B Dyson
Strong Positive Correlation
0.69
1 player
L French
2 player
Ed Sanderson
Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
L French
2 player
W Miller
Weak Positive Correlation
0.9
1 player
L French
2 player
G Richardson
Strong Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
L French
2 player
T Gregory
Weak Positive Correlation
0.78
1 player
L French
2 player
B Mortimore
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
L French
2 player
L French
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.03
1 player
L French
2 player
A Walbridge
No Correlation
0.06
1 player
L French
2 player
J Isidore
No Correlation
0.6
1 player
A Walbridge
2 player
S Burdekin
Positive Correlation
0.05
1 player
A Walbridge
2 player
S Thornton
No Correlation
0.06
1 player
A Walbridge
2 player
B Dyson
No Correlation
-0.04
1 player
A Walbridge
2 player
Ed Sanderson
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
A Walbridge
2 player
W Miller
Weak Positive Correlation
0.16
1 player
A Walbridge
2 player
G Richardson
No Correlation
0.26
1 player
A Walbridge
2 player
T Gregory
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
A Walbridge
2 player
B Mortimore
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.03
1 player
A Walbridge
2 player
L French
No Correlation
1
1 player
A Walbridge
2 player
A Walbridge
Strong Positive Correlation
0.56
1 player
A Walbridge
2 player
J Isidore
Positive Correlation
0.46
1 player
J Isidore
2 player
S Burdekin
Positive Correlation
-0.02
1 player
J Isidore
2 player
S Thornton
No Correlation
-0.08
1 player
J Isidore
2 player
B Dyson
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
J Isidore
2 player
Ed Sanderson
No Correlation
0.34
1 player
J Isidore
2 player
W Miller
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.12
1 player
J Isidore
2 player
G Richardson
No Correlation
0.47
1 player
J Isidore
2 player
T Gregory
Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
J Isidore
2 player
B Mortimore
Weak Positive Correlation
0.06
1 player
J Isidore
2 player
L French
No Correlation
0.56
1 player
J Isidore
2 player
A Walbridge
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
J Isidore
2 player
J Isidore
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick S Burdekin and A Walbridge together
Positive Correlation

Pick S Thornton and L French together
Strong Positive Correlation

Pick B Dyson and Ed Sanderson together
Positive Correlation

Pick B Dyson and G Richardson together
Strong Positive Correlation

Pick B Dyson and B Mortimore together
Strong Positive Correlation

Pick B Dyson and L French together
Strong Positive Correlation

Pick Ed Sanderson and G Richardson together
Positive Correlation

Pick Ed Sanderson and B Mortimore together
Strong Positive Correlation

Pick Ed Sanderson and L French together
Positive Correlation

Pick G Richardson and B Mortimore together
Strong Positive Correlation

Pick G Richardson and L French together
Strong Positive Correlation

Pick B Mortimore and L French together
Positive Correlation

High Performing Players

1 S Burdekin

AR
Similar Perfomance
A Walbridge 0.6
J Isidore 0.46
T Gregory 0.36
W Miller 0.19
S Thornton 0.08
Opposite Perfomance
B Dyson -0.38
G Richardson -0.23
L French -0.2
Ed Sanderson -0.14

2 J Isidore

WK
Similar Perfomance
A Walbridge 0.56
T Gregory 0.47
S Burdekin 0.46
W Miller 0.34
B Mortimore 0.27
Ed Sanderson 0.11
L French 0.06
Opposite Perfomance
G Richardson -0.12
B Dyson -0.08
S Thornton -0.02

3 T Gregory

BOW
Similar Perfomance
J Isidore 0.47
W Miller 0.45
S Burdekin 0.36
L French 0.31
B Mortimore 0.26
A Walbridge 0.26
S Thornton 0.22
Ed Sanderson 0.22
B Dyson 0.14
G Richardson 0.09

4 W Miller

BOW
Similar Perfomance
S Thornton 0.45
T Gregory 0.45
J Isidore 0.34
L French 0.26
G Richardson 0.25
A Walbridge 0.25
S Burdekin 0.19
Ed Sanderson 0.19
B Mortimore 0.14
Opposite Perfomance
B Dyson -0.04

5 A Walbridge

AR
Similar Perfomance
S Burdekin 0.6
J Isidore 0.56
T Gregory 0.26
W Miller 0.25
B Mortimore 0.23
G Richardson 0.16
B Dyson 0.06
S Thornton 0.05
Opposite Perfomance
Ed Sanderson -0.04
L French -0.03

Best CGD Player Combinations

Best CGD Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad
M Rasel BOW CGD
A Kumara WK CGD
S Hossain BOW CGD
C Kumara BAT CGD
J Mia AR CGD
A Hossain AR CGD
H Hossain WK CGD
S Shuvo BAT CGD
R Sarker WK CGD
D Prarthana AR CGD
M Rasel
A Kumara
S Hossain
C Kumara
J Mia
A Hossain
H Hossain
S Shuvo
R Sarker
D Prarthana
1
1 player
M Rasel
2 player
M Rasel
Strong Positive Correlation
0.65
1 player
M Rasel
2 player
A Kumara
Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
M Rasel
2 player
S Hossain
Weak Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
M Rasel
2 player
C Kumara
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
M Rasel
2 player
J Mia
No Correlation
0.19
1 player
M Rasel
2 player
A Hossain
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
M Rasel
2 player
H Hossain
Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
M Rasel
2 player
S Shuvo
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
M Rasel
2 player
R Sarker
Weak Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
M Rasel
2 player
D Prarthana
Weak Positive Correlation
0.65
1 player
A Kumara
2 player
M Rasel
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
A Kumara
2 player
A Kumara
Strong Positive Correlation
0.85
1 player
A Kumara
2 player
S Hossain
Strong Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
A Kumara
2 player
C Kumara
Weak Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
A Kumara
2 player
J Mia
No Correlation
-0.12
1 player
A Kumara
2 player
A Hossain
No Correlation
0.75
1 player
A Kumara
2 player
H Hossain
Positive Correlation
0.53
1 player
A Kumara
2 player
S Shuvo
Positive Correlation
-0.03
1 player
A Kumara
2 player
R Sarker
No Correlation
-0.13
1 player
A Kumara
2 player
D Prarthana
No Correlation
0.36
1 player
S Hossain
2 player
M Rasel
Weak Positive Correlation
0.85
1 player
S Hossain
2 player
A Kumara
Strong Positive Correlation
1
1 player
S Hossain
2 player
S Hossain
Strong Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
S Hossain
2 player
C Kumara
Weak Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
S Hossain
2 player
J Mia
No Correlation
-0.26
1 player
S Hossain
2 player
A Hossain
Weak Negative Correlation
0.64
1 player
S Hossain
2 player
H Hossain
Positive Correlation
0.49
1 player
S Hossain
2 player
S Shuvo
Positive Correlation
0.04
1 player
S Hossain
2 player
R Sarker
No Correlation
-0.1
1 player
S Hossain
2 player
D Prarthana
No Correlation
0.12
1 player
C Kumara
2 player
M Rasel
No Correlation
0.3
1 player
C Kumara
2 player
A Kumara
Weak Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
C Kumara
2 player
S Hossain
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
C Kumara
2 player
C Kumara
Strong Positive Correlation
0.29
1 player
C Kumara
2 player
J Mia
Weak Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
C Kumara
2 player
A Hossain
Weak Positive Correlation
0.6
1 player
C Kumara
2 player
H Hossain
Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
C Kumara
2 player
S Shuvo
Weak Positive Correlation
0.04
1 player
C Kumara
2 player
R Sarker
No Correlation
0.39
1 player
C Kumara
2 player
D Prarthana
Weak Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
J Mia
2 player
M Rasel
No Correlation
0.1
1 player
J Mia
2 player
A Kumara
No Correlation
0.13
1 player
J Mia
2 player
S Hossain
No Correlation
0.29
1 player
J Mia
2 player
C Kumara
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
J Mia
2 player
J Mia
Strong Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
J Mia
2 player
A Hossain
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
J Mia
2 player
H Hossain
Positive Correlation
0.45
1 player
J Mia
2 player
S Shuvo
Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
J Mia
2 player
R Sarker
No Correlation
0.31
1 player
J Mia
2 player
D Prarthana
Weak Positive Correlation
0.19
1 player
A Hossain
2 player
M Rasel
No Correlation
-0.12
1 player
A Hossain
2 player
A Kumara
No Correlation
-0.26
1 player
A Hossain
2 player
S Hossain
Weak Negative Correlation
0.27
1 player
A Hossain
2 player
C Kumara
Weak Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
A Hossain
2 player
J Mia
No Correlation
1
1 player
A Hossain
2 player
A Hossain
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.02
1 player
A Hossain
2 player
H Hossain
No Correlation
0.31
1 player
A Hossain
2 player
S Shuvo
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.02
1 player
A Hossain
2 player
R Sarker
No Correlation
0.52
1 player
A Hossain
2 player
D Prarthana
Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
H Hossain
2 player
M Rasel
Positive Correlation
0.75
1 player
H Hossain
2 player
A Kumara
Positive Correlation
0.64
1 player
H Hossain
2 player
S Hossain
Positive Correlation
0.6
1 player
H Hossain
2 player
C Kumara
Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
H Hossain
2 player
J Mia
Positive Correlation
-0.02
1 player
H Hossain
2 player
A Hossain
No Correlation
1
1 player
H Hossain
2 player
H Hossain
Strong Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
H Hossain
2 player
S Shuvo
Positive Correlation
0.06
1 player
H Hossain
2 player
R Sarker
No Correlation
0.21
1 player
H Hossain
2 player
D Prarthana
Weak Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
S Shuvo
2 player
M Rasel
No Correlation
0.53
1 player
S Shuvo
2 player
A Kumara
Positive Correlation
0.49
1 player
S Shuvo
2 player
S Hossain
Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
S Shuvo
2 player
C Kumara
Weak Positive Correlation
0.45
1 player
S Shuvo
2 player
J Mia
Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
S Shuvo
2 player
A Hossain
Weak Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
S Shuvo
2 player
H Hossain
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
S Shuvo
2 player
S Shuvo
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.27
1 player
S Shuvo
2 player
R Sarker
Weak Negative Correlation
0.08
1 player
S Shuvo
2 player
D Prarthana
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
R Sarker
2 player
M Rasel
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.03
1 player
R Sarker
2 player
A Kumara
No Correlation
0.04
1 player
R Sarker
2 player
S Hossain
No Correlation
0.04
1 player
R Sarker
2 player
C Kumara
No Correlation
0.09
1 player
R Sarker
2 player
J Mia
No Correlation
-0.02
1 player
R Sarker
2 player
A Hossain
No Correlation
0.06
1 player
R Sarker
2 player
H Hossain
No Correlation
-0.27
1 player
R Sarker
2 player
S Shuvo
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
R Sarker
2 player
R Sarker
Strong Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
R Sarker
2 player
D Prarthana
Weak Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
D Prarthana
2 player
M Rasel
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.13
1 player
D Prarthana
2 player
A Kumara
No Correlation
-0.1
1 player
D Prarthana
2 player
S Hossain
No Correlation
0.39
1 player
D Prarthana
2 player
C Kumara
Weak Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
D Prarthana
2 player
J Mia
Weak Positive Correlation
0.52
1 player
D Prarthana
2 player
A Hossain
Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
D Prarthana
2 player
H Hossain
Weak Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
D Prarthana
2 player
S Shuvo
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
D Prarthana
2 player
R Sarker
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
D Prarthana
2 player
D Prarthana
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick M Rasel and A Kumara together
Positive Correlation

Pick A Kumara and S Hossain together
Strong Positive Correlation

Pick A Kumara and H Hossain together
Positive Correlation

Pick S Hossain and H Hossain together
Positive Correlation

Pick C Kumara and H Hossain together
Positive Correlation

High Performing Players

1 D Prarthana

AR
Similar Perfomance
A Hossain 0.52
C Kumara 0.39
R Sarker 0.35
J Mia 0.31
M Rasel 0.3
H Hossain 0.21
S Shuvo 0.08
Opposite Perfomance
A Kumara -0.13
S Hossain -0.1

2 A Hossain

AR
Similar Perfomance
D Prarthana 0.52
S Shuvo 0.31
C Kumara 0.27
M Rasel 0.19
J Mia 0.08
Opposite Perfomance
S Hossain -0.26
A Kumara -0.12
H Hossain -0.02
R Sarker -0.02

3 R Sarker

WK
Similar Perfomance
D Prarthana 0.35
M Rasel 0.28
J Mia 0.09
H Hossain 0.06
S Hossain 0.04
C Kumara 0.04
Opposite Perfomance
S Shuvo -0.27
A Kumara -0.03
A Hossain -0.02

4 M Rasel

BOW
Similar Perfomance
A Kumara 0.65
H Hossain 0.4
S Hossain 0.36
D Prarthana 0.3
R Sarker 0.28
A Hossain 0.19
S Shuvo 0.15
C Kumara 0.12
J Mia 0.11

5 J Mia

AR
Similar Perfomance
S Shuvo 0.45
H Hossain 0.4
D Prarthana 0.31
C Kumara 0.29
S Hossain 0.13
M Rasel 0.11
A Kumara 0.1
R Sarker 0.09
A Hossain 0.08

Best BFC Player Combinations

Best BFC Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad
S Burdekin AR BFC
S Thornton BOW BFC
B Dyson BAT BFC
Ed Sanderson AR BFC
W Miller BOW BFC
G Richardson BAT BFC
T Gregory BOW BFC
B Mortimore BOW BFC
L French BAT BFC
A Walbridge AR BFC
J Isidore WK BFC
S Burdekin
S Thornton
B Dyson
Ed Sanderson
W Miller
G Richardson
T Gregory
B Mortimore
L French
A Walbridge
J Isidore
1
1 player
S Burdekin
2 player
S Burdekin
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.27
1 player
S Burdekin
2 player
S Thornton
Weak Negative Correlation
-1
1 player
S Burdekin
2 player
B Dyson
Strong Negative Correlation
-0.53
1 player
S Burdekin
2 player
Ed Sanderson
Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
S Burdekin
2 player
W Miller
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.5
1 player
S Burdekin
2 player
G Richardson
Negative Correlation
0.69
1 player
S Burdekin
2 player
T Gregory
Positive Correlation
-0.71
1 player
S Burdekin
2 player
B Mortimore
Negative Correlation
-1
1 player
S Burdekin
2 player
L French
Strong Negative Correlation
1
1 player
S Burdekin
2 player
A Walbridge
Strong Positive Correlation
0.67
1 player
S Burdekin
2 player
J Isidore
Positive Correlation
-0.27
1 player
S Thornton
2 player
S Burdekin
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
S Thornton
2 player
S Thornton
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
S Thornton
2 player
B Dyson
No Correlation
0
1 player
S Thornton
2 player
Ed Sanderson
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
S Thornton
2 player
W Miller
No Correlation
0
1 player
S Thornton
2 player
G Richardson
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
S Thornton
2 player
T Gregory
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
S Thornton
2 player
B Mortimore
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
S Thornton
2 player
L French
Positive Correlation
-0.42
1 player
S Thornton
2 player
A Walbridge
Negative Correlation
-0.45
1 player
S Thornton
2 player
J Isidore
Negative Correlation
-1
1 player
B Dyson
2 player
S Burdekin
Strong Negative Correlation
0
1 player
B Dyson
2 player
S Thornton
No Correlation
1
1 player
B Dyson
2 player
B Dyson
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
B Dyson
2 player
Ed Sanderson
No Correlation
-0.42
1 player
B Dyson
2 player
W Miller
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
B Dyson
2 player
G Richardson
Positive Correlation
-0.42
1 player
B Dyson
2 player
T Gregory
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
B Dyson
2 player
B Mortimore
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
B Dyson
2 player
L French
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
B Dyson
2 player
A Walbridge
Negative Correlation
-1
1 player
B Dyson
2 player
J Isidore
Strong Negative Correlation
-0.53
1 player
Ed Sanderson
2 player
S Burdekin
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
Ed Sanderson
2 player
S Thornton
No Correlation
0
1 player
Ed Sanderson
2 player
B Dyson
No Correlation
1
1 player
Ed Sanderson
2 player
Ed Sanderson
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.43
1 player
Ed Sanderson
2 player
W Miller
Negative Correlation
0.09
1 player
Ed Sanderson
2 player
G Richardson
No Correlation
-0.54
1 player
Ed Sanderson
2 player
T Gregory
Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
Ed Sanderson
2 player
B Mortimore
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
Ed Sanderson
2 player
L French
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.67
1 player
Ed Sanderson
2 player
A Walbridge
Negative Correlation
-0.41
1 player
Ed Sanderson
2 player
J Isidore
Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
W Miller
2 player
S Burdekin
Weak Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
W Miller
2 player
S Thornton
No Correlation
-0.42
1 player
W Miller
2 player
B Dyson
Negative Correlation
-0.43
1 player
W Miller
2 player
Ed Sanderson
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
W Miller
2 player
W Miller
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.4
1 player
W Miller
2 player
G Richardson
Weak Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
W Miller
2 player
T Gregory
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
W Miller
2 player
B Mortimore
No Correlation
-0.43
1 player
W Miller
2 player
L French
Negative Correlation
0.43
1 player
W Miller
2 player
A Walbridge
Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
W Miller
2 player
J Isidore
Positive Correlation
-0.5
1 player
G Richardson
2 player
S Burdekin
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
G Richardson
2 player
S Thornton
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
G Richardson
2 player
B Dyson
Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
G Richardson
2 player
Ed Sanderson
No Correlation
-0.4
1 player
G Richardson
2 player
W Miller
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
G Richardson
2 player
G Richardson
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.43
1 player
G Richardson
2 player
T Gregory
Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
G Richardson
2 player
B Mortimore
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
G Richardson
2 player
L French
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
G Richardson
2 player
A Walbridge
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.67
1 player
G Richardson
2 player
J Isidore
Negative Correlation
0.69
1 player
T Gregory
2 player
S Burdekin
Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
T Gregory
2 player
S Thornton
No Correlation
-0.42
1 player
T Gregory
2 player
B Dyson
Negative Correlation
-0.54
1 player
T Gregory
2 player
Ed Sanderson
Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
T Gregory
2 player
W Miller
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.43
1 player
T Gregory
2 player
G Richardson
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
T Gregory
2 player
T Gregory
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.67
1 player
T Gregory
2 player
B Mortimore
Negative Correlation
-0.67
1 player
T Gregory
2 player
L French
Negative Correlation
0.67
1 player
T Gregory
2 player
A Walbridge
Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
T Gregory
2 player
J Isidore
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.71
1 player
B Mortimore
2 player
S Burdekin
Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
B Mortimore
2 player
S Thornton
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
B Mortimore
2 player
B Dyson
Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
B Mortimore
2 player
Ed Sanderson
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
B Mortimore
2 player
W Miller
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
B Mortimore
2 player
G Richardson
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.67
1 player
B Mortimore
2 player
T Gregory
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
B Mortimore
2 player
B Mortimore
Strong Positive Correlation
0.67
1 player
B Mortimore
2 player
L French
Positive Correlation
-0.67
1 player
B Mortimore
2 player
A Walbridge
Negative Correlation
-0.71
1 player
B Mortimore
2 player
J Isidore
Negative Correlation
-1
1 player
L French
2 player
S Burdekin
Strong Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
L French
2 player
S Thornton
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
L French
2 player
B Dyson
Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
L French
2 player
Ed Sanderson
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.43
1 player
L French
2 player
W Miller
Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
L French
2 player
G Richardson
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.67
1 player
L French
2 player
T Gregory
Negative Correlation
0.67
1 player
L French
2 player
B Mortimore
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
L French
2 player
L French
Strong Positive Correlation
-1
1 player
L French
2 player
A Walbridge
Strong Negative Correlation
-1
1 player
L French
2 player
J Isidore
Strong Negative Correlation
1
1 player
A Walbridge
2 player
S Burdekin
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.42
1 player
A Walbridge
2 player
S Thornton
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
A Walbridge
2 player
B Dyson
Negative Correlation
-0.67
1 player
A Walbridge
2 player
Ed Sanderson
Negative Correlation
0.43
1 player
A Walbridge
2 player
W Miller
Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
A Walbridge
2 player
G Richardson
Weak Negative Correlation
0.67
1 player
A Walbridge
2 player
T Gregory
Positive Correlation
-0.67
1 player
A Walbridge
2 player
B Mortimore
Negative Correlation
-1
1 player
A Walbridge
2 player
L French
Strong Negative Correlation
1
1 player
A Walbridge
2 player
A Walbridge
Strong Positive Correlation
1
1 player
A Walbridge
2 player
J Isidore
Strong Positive Correlation
0.67
1 player
J Isidore
2 player
S Burdekin
Positive Correlation
-0.45
1 player
J Isidore
2 player
S Thornton
Negative Correlation
-1
1 player
J Isidore
2 player
B Dyson
Strong Negative Correlation
-0.41
1 player
J Isidore
2 player
Ed Sanderson
Negative Correlation
0.47
1 player
J Isidore
2 player
W Miller
Positive Correlation
-0.67
1 player
J Isidore
2 player
G Richardson
Negative Correlation
0.38
1 player
J Isidore
2 player
T Gregory
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.71
1 player
J Isidore
2 player
B Mortimore
Negative Correlation
-1
1 player
J Isidore
2 player
L French
Strong Negative Correlation
1
1 player
J Isidore
2 player
A Walbridge
Strong Positive Correlation
1
1 player
J Isidore
2 player
J Isidore
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick S Burdekin and T Gregory together
Positive Correlation

Pick S Burdekin and J Isidore together
Positive Correlation

Pick T Gregory and A Walbridge together
Positive Correlation

Pick A Walbridge and J Isidore together
Strong Positive Correlation

Pick S Burdekin and B Dyson together
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick S Burdekin and B Mortimore together
Negative Correlation

Pick S Burdekin and L French together
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick B Dyson and A Walbridge together
Negative Correlation

Pick B Dyson and J Isidore together
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick Ed Sanderson and A Walbridge together
Negative Correlation

Pick G Richardson and J Isidore together
Negative Correlation

Pick T Gregory and B Mortimore together
Negative Correlation

Pick T Gregory and L French together
Negative Correlation

Pick B Mortimore and A Walbridge together
Negative Correlation

Pick B Mortimore and J Isidore together
Negative Correlation

Pick L French and A Walbridge together
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick L French and J Isidore together
Strong Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 S Burdekin

AR
Similar Perfomance
A Walbridge 1
T Gregory 0.69
J Isidore 0.67
W Miller 0.33
Opposite Perfomance
B Dyson -1
L French -1
B Mortimore -0.71
Ed Sanderson -0.53
G Richardson -0.5
S Thornton -0.27

2 J Isidore

WK
Similar Perfomance
A Walbridge 1
S Burdekin 0.67
W Miller 0.47
T Gregory 0.38
Opposite Perfomance
B Dyson -1
L French -1
B Mortimore -0.71
G Richardson -0.67
S Thornton -0.45
Ed Sanderson -0.41

3 T Gregory

BOW
Similar Perfomance
S Burdekin 0.69
A Walbridge 0.67
J Isidore 0.38
W Miller 0.33
Opposite Perfomance
B Mortimore -0.67
L French -0.67
Ed Sanderson -0.54
G Richardson -0.43
B Dyson -0.42
S Thornton -0.14

4 W Miller

BOW
Similar Perfomance
J Isidore 0.47
A Walbridge 0.43
S Burdekin 0.33
T Gregory 0.33
S Thornton 0.11
Opposite Perfomance
Ed Sanderson -0.43
L French -0.43
B Dyson -0.42
G Richardson -0.4
B Mortimore -0.14

5 A Walbridge

AR
Similar Perfomance
S Burdekin 1
J Isidore 1
T Gregory 0.67
W Miller 0.43
Opposite Perfomance
L French -1
B Dyson -0.7
Ed Sanderson -0.67
B Mortimore -0.67
S Thornton -0.42
G Richardson -0.33

Best CGD Player Combinations

Best CGD Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

No data found

No data found

High Performing Players

PerfectLineup © 2024. All Rights Reserved