BLZ vs CES

This guide is super useful for identifying player combinations that are likely to score big. Use the filters to identify the best player combinations according to specific match scenarios.

Both players generally perform similarly when picked together. They either score high together or score low together. Maximise FPts by picking players that correlate positively with top players.

Both players generally perform in an opposite manner. If one player scores high, the other usually scores low. Avoid picking players that correlate negatively with top player

Show Player Combinations on the basis of:

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

T Beaumont BAT BLZ

H Graham AR BLZ

K Gordon BOW BLZ

K Bryce AR BLZ

L Higham BOW BLZ

M Kelly BAT BLZ

S Bryce WK BLZ

G Ballinger BOW BLZ

M Kirk BAT BLZ

E Claridge WK BLZ

J Groves BOW BLZ

T Beaumont

H Graham

K Gordon

K Bryce

L Higham

M Kelly

S Bryce

G Ballinger

M Kirk

E Claridge

J Groves

1

1 player

H Graham

2 player

H Graham

Strong Positive Correlation

0.55

1 player

H Graham

2 player

K Gordon

Positive Correlation

0.57

1 player

H Graham

2 player

K Bryce

Positive Correlation

0.1

1 player

H Graham

2 player

L Higham

No Correlation

0.23

1 player

H Graham

2 player

M Kelly

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.03

1 player

H Graham

2 player

S Bryce

No Correlation

0.7

1 player

H Graham

2 player

G Ballinger

Positive Correlation

-0.37

1 player

H Graham

2 player

E Claridge

Weak Negative Correlation

0.56

1 player

H Graham

2 player

J Groves

Positive Correlation

0.55

1 player

K Gordon

2 player

H Graham

Positive Correlation

1

1 player

K Gordon

2 player

K Gordon

Strong Positive Correlation

0.39

1 player

K Gordon

2 player

K Bryce

Weak Positive Correlation

0.17

1 player

K Gordon

2 player

L Higham

No Correlation

0.19

1 player

K Gordon

2 player

M Kelly

No Correlation

0.3

1 player

K Gordon

2 player

S Bryce

Weak Positive Correlation

0.25

1 player

K Gordon

2 player

G Ballinger

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.3

1 player

K Gordon

2 player

E Claridge

Weak Negative Correlation

0.06

1 player

K Gordon

2 player

J Groves

No Correlation

0.57

1 player

K Bryce

2 player

H Graham

Positive Correlation

0.39

1 player

K Bryce

2 player

K Gordon

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

K Bryce

2 player

K Bryce

Strong Positive Correlation

0.22

1 player

K Bryce

2 player

L Higham

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.16

1 player

K Bryce

2 player

M Kelly

No Correlation

0.23

1 player

K Bryce

2 player

S Bryce

Weak Positive Correlation

0.22

1 player

K Bryce

2 player

G Ballinger

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.37

1 player

K Bryce

2 player

E Claridge

Weak Negative Correlation

0.06

1 player

K Bryce

2 player

J Groves

No Correlation

0.1

1 player

L Higham

2 player

H Graham

No Correlation

0.17

1 player

L Higham

2 player

K Gordon

No Correlation

0.22

1 player

L Higham

2 player

K Bryce

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

L Higham

2 player

L Higham

Strong Positive Correlation

0.24

1 player

L Higham

2 player

M Kelly

Weak Positive Correlation

0.44

1 player

L Higham

2 player

S Bryce

Positive Correlation

0.05

1 player

L Higham

2 player

G Ballinger

No Correlation

0.12

1 player

L Higham

2 player

E Claridge

No Correlation

0.32

1 player

L Higham

2 player

J Groves

Weak Positive Correlation

0.23

1 player

M Kelly

2 player

H Graham

Weak Positive Correlation

0.19

1 player

M Kelly

2 player

K Gordon

No Correlation

-0.16

1 player

M Kelly

2 player

K Bryce

No Correlation

0.24

1 player

M Kelly

2 player

L Higham

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

M Kelly

2 player

M Kelly

Strong Positive Correlation

0.27

1 player

M Kelly

2 player

S Bryce

Weak Positive Correlation

0.24

1 player

M Kelly

2 player

G Ballinger

Weak Positive Correlation

0.42

1 player

M Kelly

2 player

E Claridge

Positive Correlation

0.29

1 player

M Kelly

2 player

J Groves

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.03

1 player

S Bryce

2 player

H Graham

No Correlation

0.3

1 player

S Bryce

2 player

K Gordon

Weak Positive Correlation

0.23

1 player

S Bryce

2 player

K Bryce

Weak Positive Correlation

0.44

1 player

S Bryce

2 player

L Higham

Positive Correlation

0.27

1 player

S Bryce

2 player

M Kelly

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

S Bryce

2 player

S Bryce

Strong Positive Correlation

0.05

1 player

S Bryce

2 player

G Ballinger

No Correlation

0.11

1 player

S Bryce

2 player

E Claridge

No Correlation

-0.07

1 player

S Bryce

2 player

J Groves

No Correlation

0.7

1 player

G Ballinger

2 player

H Graham

Positive Correlation

0.25

1 player

G Ballinger

2 player

K Gordon

Weak Positive Correlation

0.22

1 player

G Ballinger

2 player

K Bryce

Weak Positive Correlation

0.05

1 player

G Ballinger

2 player

L Higham

No Correlation

0.24

1 player

G Ballinger

2 player

M Kelly

Weak Positive Correlation

0.05

1 player

G Ballinger

2 player

S Bryce

No Correlation

1

1 player

G Ballinger

2 player

G Ballinger

Strong Positive Correlation

0.25

1 player

G Ballinger

2 player

E Claridge

Weak Positive Correlation

0.27

1 player

G Ballinger

2 player

J Groves

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.37

1 player

E Claridge

2 player

H Graham

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.3

1 player

E Claridge

2 player

K Gordon

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.37

1 player

E Claridge

2 player

K Bryce

Weak Negative Correlation

0.12

1 player

E Claridge

2 player

L Higham

No Correlation

0.42

1 player

E Claridge

2 player

M Kelly

Positive Correlation

0.11

1 player

E Claridge

2 player

S Bryce

No Correlation

0.25

1 player

E Claridge

2 player

G Ballinger

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

E Claridge

2 player

E Claridge

Strong Positive Correlation

0.05

1 player

E Claridge

2 player

J Groves

No Correlation

0.56

1 player

J Groves

2 player

H Graham

Positive Correlation

0.06

1 player

J Groves

2 player

K Gordon

No Correlation

0.06

1 player

J Groves

2 player

K Bryce

No Correlation

0.32

1 player

J Groves

2 player

L Higham

Weak Positive Correlation

0.29

1 player

J Groves

2 player

M Kelly

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.07

1 player

J Groves

2 player

S Bryce

No Correlation

0.27

1 player

J Groves

2 player

G Ballinger

Weak Positive Correlation

0.05

1 player

J Groves

2 player

E Claridge

No Correlation

1

1 player

J Groves

2 player

J Groves

Strong Positive Correlation

Strong Positive Correlation

No Correlation

Strong Negative Correlation

Pick **H Graham** and **G Ballinger** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **M Kirk** and **E Claridge** together

Positive Correlation

Don’t Pick **H Graham** and **M Kirk** together

Negative Correlation

Similar Perfomance

H Graham 0.57

K Gordon 0.39

S Bryce 0.23

L Higham 0.22

G Ballinger 0.22

J Groves 0.06

Opposite Perfomance

E Claridge -0.37

M Kelly -0.16

Similar Perfomance

H Graham 0.55

K Bryce 0.39

S Bryce 0.3

G Ballinger 0.25

M Kelly 0.19

L Higham 0.17

J Groves 0.06

Opposite Perfomance

E Claridge -0.3

Similar Perfomance

H Graham 0.7

J Groves 0.27

K Gordon 0.25

E Claridge 0.25

M Kelly 0.24

K Bryce 0.22

L Higham 0.05

S Bryce 0.05

Similar Perfomance

L Higham 0.44

K Gordon 0.3

M Kelly 0.27

K Bryce 0.23

E Claridge 0.11

G Ballinger 0.05

Opposite Perfomance

J Groves -0.07

H Graham -0.03

Similar Perfomance

E Claridge 0.42

J Groves 0.29

S Bryce 0.27

L Higham 0.24

G Ballinger 0.24

H Graham 0.23

K Gordon 0.19

Opposite Perfomance

K Bryce -0.16

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

C Pavely AR CES

C Webb BAT CES

K George AR CES

A Freeborn WK CES

E Jones BAT CES

A Campbell BAT CES

G Davis BOW CES

E Arlott AR CES

G Potts BOW CES

H Baker BOW CES

D Perrin BAT CES

C Pavely

C Webb

K George

A Freeborn

E Jones

A Campbell

G Davis

E Arlott

G Potts

H Baker

D Perrin

1

1 player

C Pavely

2 player

C Pavely

Strong Positive Correlation

0.19

1 player

C Pavely

2 player

C Webb

No Correlation

0.29

1 player

C Pavely

2 player

K George

Weak Positive Correlation

0.17

1 player

C Pavely

2 player

A Freeborn

No Correlation

0.4

1 player

C Pavely

2 player

E Jones

Positive Correlation

0.32

1 player

C Pavely

2 player

G Davis

Weak Positive Correlation

0.35

1 player

C Pavely

2 player

E Arlott

Weak Positive Correlation

0.27

1 player

C Pavely

2 player

G Potts

Weak Positive Correlation

0.23

1 player

C Pavely

2 player

H Baker

Weak Positive Correlation

0.32

1 player

C Pavely

2 player

D Perrin

Weak Positive Correlation

0.19

1 player

C Webb

2 player

C Pavely

No Correlation

1

1 player

C Webb

2 player

C Webb

Strong Positive Correlation

0.17

1 player

C Webb

2 player

K George

No Correlation

-0.1

1 player

C Webb

2 player

A Freeborn

No Correlation

0.39

1 player

C Webb

2 player

E Jones

Weak Positive Correlation

0.05

1 player

C Webb

2 player

G Davis

No Correlation

0.01

1 player

C Webb

2 player

E Arlott

No Correlation

0.05

1 player

C Webb

2 player

G Potts

No Correlation

0.45

1 player

C Webb

2 player

H Baker

Positive Correlation

0.4

1 player

C Webb

2 player

D Perrin

Positive Correlation

0.29

1 player

K George

2 player

C Pavely

Weak Positive Correlation

0.17

1 player

K George

2 player

C Webb

No Correlation

1

1 player

K George

2 player

K George

Strong Positive Correlation

0.04

1 player

K George

2 player

A Freeborn

No Correlation

0.48

1 player

K George

2 player

E Jones

Positive Correlation

0.32

1 player

K George

2 player

G Davis

Weak Positive Correlation

0.24

1 player

K George

2 player

E Arlott

Weak Positive Correlation

0.17

1 player

K George

2 player

G Potts

No Correlation

0.19

1 player

K George

2 player

H Baker

No Correlation

0.21

1 player

K George

2 player

D Perrin

Weak Positive Correlation

0.17

1 player

A Freeborn

2 player

C Pavely

No Correlation

-0.1

1 player

A Freeborn

2 player

C Webb

No Correlation

0.04

1 player

A Freeborn

2 player

K George

No Correlation

1

1 player

A Freeborn

2 player

A Freeborn

Strong Positive Correlation

0.25

1 player

A Freeborn

2 player

E Jones

Weak Positive Correlation

0.07

1 player

A Freeborn

2 player

G Davis

No Correlation

-0.03

1 player

A Freeborn

2 player

E Arlott

No Correlation

0.23

1 player

A Freeborn

2 player

G Potts

Weak Positive Correlation

0.07

1 player

A Freeborn

2 player

H Baker

No Correlation

0.31

1 player

A Freeborn

2 player

D Perrin

Weak Positive Correlation

0.4

1 player

E Jones

2 player

C Pavely

Positive Correlation

0.39

1 player

E Jones

2 player

C Webb

Weak Positive Correlation

0.48

1 player

E Jones

2 player

K George

Positive Correlation

0.25

1 player

E Jones

2 player

A Freeborn

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

E Jones

2 player

E Jones

Strong Positive Correlation

0.45

1 player

E Jones

2 player

G Davis

Positive Correlation

0.33

1 player

E Jones

2 player

E Arlott

Weak Positive Correlation

0.41

1 player

E Jones

2 player

G Potts

Positive Correlation

0.23

1 player

E Jones

2 player

H Baker

Weak Positive Correlation

0.24

1 player

E Jones

2 player

D Perrin

Weak Positive Correlation

0.32

1 player

G Davis

2 player

C Pavely

Weak Positive Correlation

0.05

1 player

G Davis

2 player

C Webb

No Correlation

0.32

1 player

G Davis

2 player

K George

Weak Positive Correlation

0.07

1 player

G Davis

2 player

A Freeborn

No Correlation

0.45

1 player

G Davis

2 player

E Jones

Positive Correlation

1

1 player

G Davis

2 player

G Davis

Strong Positive Correlation

0.32

1 player

G Davis

2 player

E Arlott

Weak Positive Correlation

0.36

1 player

G Davis

2 player

G Potts

Weak Positive Correlation

0.24

1 player

G Davis

2 player

H Baker

Weak Positive Correlation

0.06

1 player

G Davis

2 player

D Perrin

No Correlation

0.35

1 player

E Arlott

2 player

C Pavely

Weak Positive Correlation

0.01

1 player

E Arlott

2 player

C Webb

No Correlation

0.24

1 player

E Arlott

2 player

K George

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.03

1 player

E Arlott

2 player

A Freeborn

No Correlation

0.33

1 player

E Arlott

2 player

E Jones

Weak Positive Correlation

0.32

1 player

E Arlott

2 player

G Davis

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

E Arlott

2 player

E Arlott

Strong Positive Correlation

0.05

1 player

E Arlott

2 player

G Potts

No Correlation

0.17

1 player

E Arlott

2 player

H Baker

No Correlation

-0.14

1 player

E Arlott

2 player

D Perrin

No Correlation

0.27

1 player

G Potts

2 player

C Pavely

Weak Positive Correlation

0.05

1 player

G Potts

2 player

C Webb

No Correlation

0.17

1 player

G Potts

2 player

K George

No Correlation

0.23

1 player

G Potts

2 player

A Freeborn

Weak Positive Correlation

0.41

1 player

G Potts

2 player

E Jones

Positive Correlation

0.36

1 player

G Potts

2 player

G Davis

Weak Positive Correlation

0.05

1 player

G Potts

2 player

E Arlott

No Correlation

1

1 player

G Potts

2 player

G Potts

Strong Positive Correlation

0.01

1 player

G Potts

2 player

H Baker

No Correlation

0.32

1 player

G Potts

2 player

D Perrin

Weak Positive Correlation

0.23

1 player

H Baker

2 player

C Pavely

Weak Positive Correlation

0.45

1 player

H Baker

2 player

C Webb

Positive Correlation

0.19

1 player

H Baker

2 player

K George

No Correlation

0.07

1 player

H Baker

2 player

A Freeborn

No Correlation

0.23

1 player

H Baker

2 player

E Jones

Weak Positive Correlation

0.24

1 player

H Baker

2 player

G Davis

Weak Positive Correlation

0.17

1 player

H Baker

2 player

E Arlott

No Correlation

0.01

1 player

H Baker

2 player

G Potts

No Correlation

1

1 player

H Baker

2 player

H Baker

Strong Positive Correlation

0.32

1 player

H Baker

2 player

D Perrin

Weak Positive Correlation

0.32

1 player

D Perrin

2 player

C Pavely

Weak Positive Correlation

0.4

1 player

D Perrin

2 player

C Webb

Positive Correlation

0.21

1 player

D Perrin

2 player

K George

Weak Positive Correlation

0.31

1 player

D Perrin

2 player

A Freeborn

Weak Positive Correlation

0.24

1 player

D Perrin

2 player

E Jones

Weak Positive Correlation

0.06

1 player

D Perrin

2 player

G Davis

No Correlation

-0.14

1 player

D Perrin

2 player

E Arlott

No Correlation

0.32

1 player

D Perrin

2 player

G Potts

Weak Positive Correlation

0.32

1 player

D Perrin

2 player

H Baker

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

D Perrin

2 player

D Perrin

Strong Positive Correlation

Strong Positive Correlation

No Correlation

Strong Negative Correlation

No data found

Similar Perfomance

C Pavely 0.35

E Jones 0.33

G Davis 0.32

K George 0.24

H Baker 0.17

G Potts 0.05

C Webb 0.01

Opposite Perfomance

D Perrin -0.14

A Freeborn -0.03

Similar Perfomance

K George 0.48

G Davis 0.45

G Potts 0.41

C Pavely 0.4

C Webb 0.39

E Arlott 0.33

A Freeborn 0.25

D Perrin 0.24

H Baker 0.23

Similar Perfomance

E Jones 0.41

G Davis 0.36

D Perrin 0.32

C Pavely 0.27

A Freeborn 0.23

K George 0.17

C Webb 0.05

E Arlott 0.05

H Baker 0.01

Similar Perfomance

D Perrin 0.31

E Jones 0.25

G Potts 0.23

C Pavely 0.17

G Davis 0.07

H Baker 0.07

K George 0.04

Opposite Perfomance

C Webb -0.1

E Arlott -0.03

Similar Perfomance

E Jones 0.48

G Davis 0.32

C Pavely 0.29

E Arlott 0.24

D Perrin 0.21

H Baker 0.19

C Webb 0.17

G Potts 0.17

A Freeborn 0.04

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

T Beaumont BAT BLZ

H Graham AR BLZ

K Gordon BOW BLZ

K Bryce AR BLZ

L Higham BOW BLZ

M Kelly BAT BLZ

S Bryce WK BLZ

G Ballinger BOW BLZ

M Kirk BAT BLZ

E Claridge WK BLZ

J Groves BOW BLZ

T Beaumont

H Graham

K Gordon

K Bryce

L Higham

M Kelly

S Bryce

G Ballinger

M Kirk

E Claridge

J Groves

1

1 player

H Graham

2 player

H Graham

Strong Positive Correlation

0.67

1 player

H Graham

2 player

K Gordon

Positive Correlation

0.33

1 player

H Graham

2 player

K Bryce

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.33

1 player

H Graham

2 player

L Higham

Weak Negative Correlation

0

1 player

H Graham

2 player

M Kelly

No Correlation

-0.33

1 player

H Graham

2 player

S Bryce

Weak Negative Correlation

0.67

1 player

H Graham

2 player

G Ballinger

Positive Correlation

-0.67

1 player

H Graham

2 player

E Claridge

Negative Correlation

0.14

1 player

H Graham

2 player

J Groves

No Correlation

0.67

1 player

K Gordon

2 player

H Graham

Positive Correlation

1

1 player

K Gordon

2 player

K Gordon

Strong Positive Correlation

0.53

1 player

K Gordon

2 player

K Bryce

Positive Correlation

0

1 player

K Gordon

2 player

L Higham

No Correlation

-0.11

1 player

K Gordon

2 player

M Kelly

No Correlation

0.11

1 player

K Gordon

2 player

S Bryce

No Correlation

0.06

1 player

K Gordon

2 player

G Ballinger

No Correlation

-1

1 player

K Gordon

2 player

E Claridge

Strong Negative Correlation

0

1 player

K Gordon

2 player

J Groves

No Correlation

0.33

1 player

K Bryce

2 player

H Graham

Weak Positive Correlation

0.53

1 player

K Bryce

2 player

K Gordon

Positive Correlation

1

1 player

K Bryce

2 player

K Bryce

Strong Positive Correlation

0.22

1 player

K Bryce

2 player

L Higham

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.56

1 player

K Bryce

2 player

M Kelly

Negative Correlation

0.44

1 player

K Bryce

2 player

S Bryce

Positive Correlation

0.06

1 player

K Bryce

2 player

G Ballinger

No Correlation

-0.82

1 player

K Bryce

2 player

E Claridge

Strong Negative Correlation

0.08

1 player

K Bryce

2 player

J Groves

No Correlation

-0.33

1 player

L Higham

2 player

H Graham

Weak Negative Correlation

0

1 player

L Higham

2 player

K Gordon

No Correlation

0.22

1 player

L Higham

2 player

K Bryce

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

L Higham

2 player

L Higham

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.37

1 player

L Higham

2 player

M Kelly

Weak Negative Correlation

0.16

1 player

L Higham

2 player

S Bryce

No Correlation

-0.11

1 player

L Higham

2 player

G Ballinger

No Correlation

-0.09

1 player

L Higham

2 player

E Claridge

No Correlation

0.38

1 player

L Higham

2 player

J Groves

Weak Positive Correlation

0

1 player

M Kelly

2 player

H Graham

No Correlation

-0.11

1 player

M Kelly

2 player

K Gordon

No Correlation

-0.56

1 player

M Kelly

2 player

K Bryce

Negative Correlation

-0.37

1 player

M Kelly

2 player

L Higham

Weak Negative Correlation

1

1 player

M Kelly

2 player

M Kelly

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.16

1 player

M Kelly

2 player

S Bryce

No Correlation

0

1 player

M Kelly

2 player

G Ballinger

No Correlation

0.45

1 player

M Kelly

2 player

E Claridge

Positive Correlation

-0.08

1 player

M Kelly

2 player

J Groves

No Correlation

-0.33

1 player

S Bryce

2 player

H Graham

Weak Negative Correlation

0.11

1 player

S Bryce

2 player

K Gordon

No Correlation

0.44

1 player

S Bryce

2 player

K Bryce

Positive Correlation

0.16

1 player

S Bryce

2 player

L Higham

No Correlation

-0.16

1 player

S Bryce

2 player

M Kelly

No Correlation

1

1 player

S Bryce

2 player

S Bryce

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.22

1 player

S Bryce

2 player

G Ballinger

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.27

1 player

S Bryce

2 player

E Claridge

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.08

1 player

S Bryce

2 player

J Groves

No Correlation

0.67

1 player

G Ballinger

2 player

H Graham

Positive Correlation

0.06

1 player

G Ballinger

2 player

K Gordon

No Correlation

0.06

1 player

G Ballinger

2 player

K Bryce

No Correlation

-0.11

1 player

G Ballinger

2 player

L Higham

No Correlation

0

1 player

G Ballinger

2 player

M Kelly

No Correlation

-0.22

1 player

G Ballinger

2 player

S Bryce

Weak Negative Correlation

1

1 player

G Ballinger

2 player

G Ballinger

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.27

1 player

G Ballinger

2 player

E Claridge

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.08

1 player

G Ballinger

2 player

J Groves

No Correlation

-0.67

1 player

E Claridge

2 player

H Graham

Negative Correlation

-1

1 player

E Claridge

2 player

K Gordon

Strong Negative Correlation

-0.82

1 player

E Claridge

2 player

K Bryce

Strong Negative Correlation

-0.09

1 player

E Claridge

2 player

L Higham

No Correlation

0.45

1 player

E Claridge

2 player

M Kelly

Positive Correlation

-0.27

1 player

E Claridge

2 player

S Bryce

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.27

1 player

E Claridge

2 player

G Ballinger

Weak Negative Correlation

1

1 player

E Claridge

2 player

E Claridge

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.2

1 player

E Claridge

2 player

J Groves

No Correlation

0.14

1 player

J Groves

2 player

H Graham

No Correlation

0

1 player

J Groves

2 player

K Gordon

No Correlation

0.08

1 player

J Groves

2 player

K Bryce

No Correlation

0.38

1 player

J Groves

2 player

L Higham

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.08

1 player

J Groves

2 player

M Kelly

No Correlation

-0.08

1 player

J Groves

2 player

S Bryce

No Correlation

-0.08

1 player

J Groves

2 player

G Ballinger

No Correlation

-0.2

1 player

J Groves

2 player

E Claridge

No Correlation

1

1 player

J Groves

2 player

J Groves

Strong Positive Correlation

Strong Positive Correlation

No Correlation

Strong Negative Correlation

Pick **H Graham** and **K Gordon** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **T Beaumont** and **M Kirk** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **H Graham** and **E Claridge** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **K Gordon** and **M Kirk** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **K Gordon** and **E Claridge** together

Strong Negative Correlation

Pick **K Bryce** and **E Claridge** together

Strong Negative Correlation

Similar Perfomance

H Graham 0.67

K Bryce 0.53

S Bryce 0.11

G Ballinger 0.06

Opposite Perfomance

E Claridge -1

M Kelly -0.11

Similar Perfomance

H Graham 0.67

K Gordon 0.06

K Bryce 0.06

Opposite Perfomance

E Claridge -0.27

S Bryce -0.22

L Higham -0.11

J Groves -0.08

Similar Perfomance

K Gordon 0.53

S Bryce 0.44

H Graham 0.33

L Higham 0.22

J Groves 0.08

G Ballinger 0.06

Opposite Perfomance

E Claridge -0.82

M Kelly -0.56

Similar Perfomance

K Bryce 0.44

L Higham 0.16

K Gordon 0.11

Opposite Perfomance

H Graham -0.33

E Claridge -0.27

G Ballinger -0.22

M Kelly -0.16

J Groves -0.08

Similar Perfomance

J Groves 0.38

K Bryce 0.22

S Bryce 0.16

Opposite Perfomance

M Kelly -0.37

H Graham -0.33

G Ballinger -0.11

E Claridge -0.09

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

C Pavely AR CES

C Webb BAT CES

K George AR CES

A Freeborn WK CES

E Jones BAT CES

A Campbell BAT CES

G Davis BOW CES

E Arlott AR CES

G Potts BOW CES

H Baker BOW CES

D Perrin BAT CES

C Pavely

C Webb

K George

A Freeborn

E Jones

A Campbell

G Davis

E Arlott

G Potts

H Baker

D Perrin

1

1 player

C Pavely

2 player

C Pavely

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.11

1 player

C Pavely

2 player

C Webb

No Correlation

0.09

1 player

C Pavely

2 player

K George

No Correlation

-0.09

1 player

C Pavely

2 player

A Freeborn

No Correlation

0.5

1 player

C Pavely

2 player

E Jones

Positive Correlation

-0.27

1 player

C Pavely

2 player

G Davis

Weak Negative Correlation

0.25

1 player

C Pavely

2 player

E Arlott

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.11

1 player

C Pavely

2 player

G Potts

No Correlation

-0.2

1 player

C Pavely

2 player

H Baker

No Correlation

-0.27

1 player

C Pavely

2 player

D Perrin

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.11

1 player

C Webb

2 player

C Pavely

No Correlation

1

1 player

C Webb

2 player

C Webb

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.45

1 player

C Webb

2 player

K George

Negative Correlation

-0.27

1 player

C Webb

2 player

A Freeborn

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.33

1 player

C Webb

2 player

E Jones

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.64

1 player

C Webb

2 player

G Davis

Negative Correlation

-0.2

1 player

C Webb

2 player

E Arlott

No Correlation

-0.09

1 player

C Webb

2 player

G Potts

No Correlation

0

1 player

C Webb

2 player

H Baker

No Correlation

0.45

1 player

C Webb

2 player

D Perrin

Positive Correlation

0.09

1 player

K George

2 player

C Pavely

No Correlation

-0.45

1 player

K George

2 player

C Webb

Negative Correlation

1

1 player

K George

2 player

K George

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.37

1 player

K George

2 player

A Freeborn

Weak Negative Correlation

0.25

1 player

K George

2 player

E Jones

Weak Positive Correlation

0.18

1 player

K George

2 player

G Davis

No Correlation

0.29

1 player

K George

2 player

E Arlott

Weak Positive Correlation

0.2

1 player

K George

2 player

G Potts

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.12

1 player

K George

2 player

H Baker

No Correlation

-0.41

1 player

K George

2 player

D Perrin

Negative Correlation

-0.09

1 player

A Freeborn

2 player

C Pavely

No Correlation

-0.27

1 player

A Freeborn

2 player

C Webb

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.37

1 player

A Freeborn

2 player

K George

Weak Negative Correlation

1

1 player

A Freeborn

2 player

A Freeborn

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.2

1 player

A Freeborn

2 player

E Jones

No Correlation

0.16

1 player

A Freeborn

2 player

G Davis

No Correlation

-0.22

1 player

A Freeborn

2 player

E Arlott

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.24

1 player

A Freeborn

2 player

G Potts

Weak Negative Correlation

0

1 player

A Freeborn

2 player

H Baker

No Correlation

0.18

1 player

A Freeborn

2 player

D Perrin

No Correlation

0.5

1 player

E Jones

2 player

C Pavely

Positive Correlation

-0.33

1 player

E Jones

2 player

C Webb

Weak Negative Correlation

0.25

1 player

E Jones

2 player

K George

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.2

1 player

E Jones

2 player

A Freeborn

No Correlation

1

1 player

E Jones

2 player

E Jones

Strong Positive Correlation

0.62

1 player

E Jones

2 player

G Davis

Positive Correlation

0.3

1 player

E Jones

2 player

E Arlott

Weak Positive Correlation

0.4

1 player

E Jones

2 player

G Potts

Positive Correlation

0.14

1 player

E Jones

2 player

H Baker

No Correlation

-0.43

1 player

E Jones

2 player

D Perrin

Negative Correlation

-0.27

1 player

G Davis

2 player

C Pavely

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.64

1 player

G Davis

2 player

C Webb

Negative Correlation

0.18

1 player

G Davis

2 player

K George

No Correlation

0.16

1 player

G Davis

2 player

A Freeborn

No Correlation

0.62

1 player

G Davis

2 player

E Jones

Positive Correlation

1

1 player

G Davis

2 player

G Davis

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.14

1 player

G Davis

2 player

E Arlott

No Correlation

0.29

1 player

G Davis

2 player

G Potts

Weak Positive Correlation

0

1 player

G Davis

2 player

H Baker

No Correlation

-0.29

1 player

G Davis

2 player

D Perrin

Weak Negative Correlation

0.25

1 player

E Arlott

2 player

C Pavely

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.2

1 player

E Arlott

2 player

C Webb

No Correlation

0.29

1 player

E Arlott

2 player

K George

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.22

1 player

E Arlott

2 player

A Freeborn

Weak Negative Correlation

0.3

1 player

E Arlott

2 player

E Jones

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.14

1 player

E Arlott

2 player

G Davis

No Correlation

1

1 player

E Arlott

2 player

E Arlott

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.14

1 player

E Arlott

2 player

G Potts

No Correlation

0

1 player

E Arlott

2 player

H Baker

No Correlation

-0.5

1 player

E Arlott

2 player

D Perrin

Negative Correlation

-0.11

1 player

G Potts

2 player

C Pavely

No Correlation

-0.09

1 player

G Potts

2 player

C Webb

No Correlation

0.2

1 player

G Potts

2 player

K George

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.24

1 player

G Potts

2 player

A Freeborn

Weak Negative Correlation

0.4

1 player

G Potts

2 player

E Jones

Positive Correlation

0.29

1 player

G Potts

2 player

G Davis

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.14

1 player

G Potts

2 player

E Arlott

No Correlation

1

1 player

G Potts

2 player

G Potts

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.29

1 player

G Potts

2 player

H Baker

Weak Negative Correlation

0.08

1 player

G Potts

2 player

D Perrin

No Correlation

-0.2

1 player

H Baker

2 player

C Pavely

No Correlation

0

1 player

H Baker

2 player

C Webb

No Correlation

-0.12

1 player

H Baker

2 player

K George

No Correlation

0

1 player

H Baker

2 player

A Freeborn

No Correlation

0.14

1 player

H Baker

2 player

E Jones

No Correlation

0

1 player

H Baker

2 player

G Davis

No Correlation

0

1 player

H Baker

2 player

E Arlott

No Correlation

-0.29

1 player

H Baker

2 player

G Potts

Weak Negative Correlation

1

1 player

H Baker

2 player

H Baker

Strong Positive Correlation

0.14

1 player

H Baker

2 player

D Perrin

No Correlation

-0.27

1 player

D Perrin

2 player

C Pavely

Weak Negative Correlation

0.45

1 player

D Perrin

2 player

C Webb

Positive Correlation

-0.41

1 player

D Perrin

2 player

K George

Negative Correlation

0.18

1 player

D Perrin

2 player

A Freeborn

No Correlation

-0.43

1 player

D Perrin

2 player

E Jones

Negative Correlation

-0.29

1 player

D Perrin

2 player

G Davis

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.5

1 player

D Perrin

2 player

E Arlott

Negative Correlation

0.08

1 player

D Perrin

2 player

G Potts

No Correlation

0.14

1 player

D Perrin

2 player

H Baker

No Correlation

1

1 player

D Perrin

2 player

D Perrin

Strong Positive Correlation

Strong Positive Correlation

No Correlation

Strong Negative Correlation

Pick **E Jones** and **G Davis** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **C Webb** and **G Davis** together

Negative Correlation

Similar Perfomance

E Jones 0.3

K George 0.29

C Pavely 0.25

Opposite Perfomance

D Perrin -0.5

A Freeborn -0.22

C Webb -0.2

G Davis -0.14

G Potts -0.14

Similar Perfomance

G Davis 0.62

C Pavely 0.5

G Potts 0.4

E Arlott 0.3

K George 0.25

H Baker 0.14

Opposite Perfomance

D Perrin -0.43

C Webb -0.33

A Freeborn -0.2

Similar Perfomance

D Perrin 0.18

G Davis 0.16

Opposite Perfomance

K George -0.37

C Webb -0.27

G Potts -0.24

E Arlott -0.22

E Jones -0.2

C Pavely -0.09

Similar Perfomance

E Arlott 0.29

E Jones 0.25

G Potts 0.2

G Davis 0.18

C Pavely 0.09

Opposite Perfomance

C Webb -0.45

D Perrin -0.41

A Freeborn -0.37

H Baker -0.12

Similar Perfomance

E Jones 0.14

D Perrin 0.14

Opposite Perfomance

G Potts -0.29

C Pavely -0.2

K George -0.12