Upcoming
Fixtures
View All
BLZ 22 Jun 03:30 pm CES

Lineup Out

County Ground
Charlotte Edwards Cup

Best Player Combinations For
BLZ vs CES

How it Works?

This guide is super useful for identifying player combinations that are likely to score big. Use the filters to identify the best player combinations according to specific match scenarios.

Player correlate positively

Both players generally perform similarly when picked together. They either score high together or score low together. Maximise FPts by picking players that correlate positively with top players.

Player correlate negatively

Both players generally perform in an opposite manner. If one player scores high, the other usually scores low. Avoid picking players that correlate negatively with top player

More on PL Labs

BLZ vs CES

Show Player Combinations on the basis of:

Best BLZ Player Combinations

Best BLZ Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
T Beaumont BAT BLZ
H Graham AR BLZ
K Gordon BOW BLZ
K Bryce AR BLZ
L Higham BOW BLZ
M Kelly BAT BLZ
S Bryce WK BLZ
G Ballinger BOW BLZ
M Kirk BAT BLZ
E Claridge WK BLZ
J Groves BOW BLZ
T Beaumont
H Graham
K Gordon
K Bryce
L Higham
M Kelly
S Bryce
G Ballinger
M Kirk
E Claridge
J Groves
1
1 player
T Beaumont
2 player
T Beaumont
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
T Beaumont
2 player
H Graham
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
T Beaumont
2 player
K Gordon
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
T Beaumont
2 player
K Bryce
Weak Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
T Beaumont
2 player
L Higham
No Correlation
0.19
1 player
T Beaumont
2 player
M Kelly
No Correlation
-0.01
1 player
T Beaumont
2 player
S Bryce
No Correlation
0.24
1 player
T Beaumont
2 player
G Ballinger
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.13
1 player
T Beaumont
2 player
M Kirk
No Correlation
0.31
1 player
T Beaumont
2 player
E Claridge
Weak Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
T Beaumont
2 player
J Groves
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
H Graham
2 player
T Beaumont
No Correlation
1
1 player
H Graham
2 player
H Graham
Strong Positive Correlation
0.55
1 player
H Graham
2 player
K Gordon
Positive Correlation
0.57
1 player
H Graham
2 player
K Bryce
Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
H Graham
2 player
L Higham
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
H Graham
2 player
M Kelly
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.03
1 player
H Graham
2 player
S Bryce
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
H Graham
2 player
G Ballinger
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
H Graham
2 player
M Kirk
Negative Correlation
-0.37
1 player
H Graham
2 player
E Claridge
Weak Negative Correlation
0.56
1 player
H Graham
2 player
J Groves
Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
T Beaumont
No Correlation
0.55
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
H Graham
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
K Gordon
Strong Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
K Bryce
Weak Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
L Higham
No Correlation
0.19
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
M Kelly
No Correlation
0.3
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
S Bryce
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
G Ballinger
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.18
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
M Kirk
No Correlation
-0.3
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
E Claridge
Weak Negative Correlation
0.06
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
J Groves
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
K Bryce
2 player
T Beaumont
Weak Positive Correlation
0.57
1 player
K Bryce
2 player
H Graham
Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
K Bryce
2 player
K Gordon
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
K Bryce
2 player
K Bryce
Strong Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
K Bryce
2 player
L Higham
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.12
1 player
K Bryce
2 player
M Kelly
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
K Bryce
2 player
S Bryce
Weak Positive Correlation
0.29
1 player
K Bryce
2 player
G Ballinger
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.26
1 player
K Bryce
2 player
M Kirk
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.28
1 player
K Bryce
2 player
E Claridge
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.03
1 player
K Bryce
2 player
J Groves
No Correlation
0.1
1 player
L Higham
2 player
T Beaumont
No Correlation
0.1
1 player
L Higham
2 player
H Graham
No Correlation
0.17
1 player
L Higham
2 player
K Gordon
No Correlation
0.22
1 player
L Higham
2 player
K Bryce
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
L Higham
2 player
L Higham
Strong Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
L Higham
2 player
M Kelly
Weak Positive Correlation
0.44
1 player
L Higham
2 player
S Bryce
Positive Correlation
0.05
1 player
L Higham
2 player
G Ballinger
No Correlation
0.54
1 player
L Higham
2 player
M Kirk
Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
L Higham
2 player
E Claridge
No Correlation
0.32
1 player
L Higham
2 player
J Groves
Weak Positive Correlation
0.19
1 player
M Kelly
2 player
T Beaumont
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
M Kelly
2 player
H Graham
Weak Positive Correlation
0.19
1 player
M Kelly
2 player
K Gordon
No Correlation
-0.12
1 player
M Kelly
2 player
K Bryce
No Correlation
0.24
1 player
M Kelly
2 player
L Higham
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M Kelly
2 player
M Kelly
Strong Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
M Kelly
2 player
S Bryce
Weak Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
M Kelly
2 player
G Ballinger
Weak Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
M Kelly
2 player
M Kirk
Weak Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
M Kelly
2 player
E Claridge
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
M Kelly
2 player
J Groves
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.01
1 player
S Bryce
2 player
T Beaumont
No Correlation
-0.03
1 player
S Bryce
2 player
H Graham
No Correlation
0.3
1 player
S Bryce
2 player
K Gordon
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
S Bryce
2 player
K Bryce
Weak Positive Correlation
0.44
1 player
S Bryce
2 player
L Higham
Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
S Bryce
2 player
M Kelly
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
S Bryce
2 player
S Bryce
Strong Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
S Bryce
2 player
G Ballinger
No Correlation
0.37
1 player
S Bryce
2 player
M Kirk
Weak Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
S Bryce
2 player
E Claridge
No Correlation
-0.08
1 player
S Bryce
2 player
J Groves
No Correlation
0.24
1 player
G Ballinger
2 player
T Beaumont
Weak Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
G Ballinger
2 player
H Graham
Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
G Ballinger
2 player
K Gordon
Weak Positive Correlation
0.29
1 player
G Ballinger
2 player
K Bryce
Weak Positive Correlation
0.05
1 player
G Ballinger
2 player
L Higham
No Correlation
0.27
1 player
G Ballinger
2 player
M Kelly
Weak Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
G Ballinger
2 player
S Bryce
No Correlation
1
1 player
G Ballinger
2 player
G Ballinger
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
G Ballinger
2 player
M Kirk
No Correlation
0.24
1 player
G Ballinger
2 player
E Claridge
Weak Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
G Ballinger
2 player
J Groves
No Correlation
-0.13
1 player
M Kirk
2 player
T Beaumont
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
M Kirk
2 player
H Graham
Negative Correlation
-0.18
1 player
M Kirk
2 player
K Gordon
No Correlation
-0.26
1 player
M Kirk
2 player
K Bryce
Weak Negative Correlation
0.54
1 player
M Kirk
2 player
L Higham
Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
M Kirk
2 player
M Kelly
Weak Positive Correlation
0.37
1 player
M Kirk
2 player
S Bryce
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
M Kirk
2 player
G Ballinger
No Correlation
1
1 player
M Kirk
2 player
M Kirk
Strong Positive Correlation
0.76
1 player
M Kirk
2 player
E Claridge
Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
M Kirk
2 player
J Groves
Weak Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
E Claridge
2 player
T Beaumont
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.37
1 player
E Claridge
2 player
H Graham
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.3
1 player
E Claridge
2 player
K Gordon
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.28
1 player
E Claridge
2 player
K Bryce
Weak Negative Correlation
0.12
1 player
E Claridge
2 player
L Higham
No Correlation
0.32
1 player
E Claridge
2 player
M Kelly
Weak Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
E Claridge
2 player
S Bryce
No Correlation
0.24
1 player
E Claridge
2 player
G Ballinger
Weak Positive Correlation
0.76
1 player
E Claridge
2 player
M Kirk
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
E Claridge
2 player
E Claridge
Strong Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
E Claridge
2 player
J Groves
No Correlation
0.07
1 player
J Groves
2 player
T Beaumont
No Correlation
0.56
1 player
J Groves
2 player
H Graham
Positive Correlation
0.06
1 player
J Groves
2 player
K Gordon
No Correlation
-0.03
1 player
J Groves
2 player
K Bryce
No Correlation
0.32
1 player
J Groves
2 player
L Higham
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
J Groves
2 player
M Kelly
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.08
1 player
J Groves
2 player
S Bryce
No Correlation
0.15
1 player
J Groves
2 player
G Ballinger
No Correlation
0.27
1 player
J Groves
2 player
M Kirk
Weak Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
J Groves
2 player
E Claridge
No Correlation
1
1 player
J Groves
2 player
J Groves
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick H Graham and G Ballinger together
Positive Correlation

Pick M Kirk and E Claridge together
Positive Correlation

Don’t Pick H Graham and M Kirk together
Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 K Bryce

AR
Similar Perfomance
H Graham 0.57
K Gordon 0.39
G Ballinger 0.29
S Bryce 0.23
L Higham 0.22
T Beaumont 0.2
Opposite Perfomance
E Claridge -0.28
M Kirk -0.26
M Kelly -0.12
J Groves -0.03

2 K Gordon

BOW
Similar Perfomance
H Graham 0.55
K Bryce 0.39
S Bryce 0.3
G Ballinger 0.25
M Kelly 0.19
L Higham 0.17
T Beaumont 0.14
J Groves 0.06
Opposite Perfomance
E Claridge -0.3
M Kirk -0.18

3 G Ballinger

BOW
Similar Perfomance
H Graham 0.7
K Bryce 0.29
M Kelly 0.27
K Gordon 0.25
T Beaumont 0.24
E Claridge 0.24
J Groves 0.15
S Bryce 0.08
L Higham 0.05

4 S Bryce

WK
Similar Perfomance
L Higham 0.44
M Kirk 0.37
K Gordon 0.3
M Kelly 0.26
K Bryce 0.23
E Claridge 0.13
G Ballinger 0.08
Opposite Perfomance
J Groves -0.08
H Graham -0.03
T Beaumont -0.01

5 M Kelly

BAT
Similar Perfomance
E Claridge 0.32
M Kirk 0.3
G Ballinger 0.27
S Bryce 0.26
L Higham 0.24
H Graham 0.23
J Groves 0.23
T Beaumont 0.19
K Gordon 0.19
Opposite Perfomance
K Bryce -0.12

Best CES Player Combinations

Best CES Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
C Pavely AR CES
C Webb BAT CES
K George AR CES
A Freeborn WK CES
E Jones BAT CES
A Campbell BAT CES
G Davis BOW CES
E Arlott AR CES
G Potts BOW CES
H Baker BOW CES
D Perrin BAT CES
C Pavely
C Webb
K George
A Freeborn
E Jones
A Campbell
G Davis
E Arlott
G Potts
H Baker
D Perrin
1
1 player
C Pavely
2 player
C Pavely
Strong Positive Correlation
0.19
1 player
C Pavely
2 player
C Webb
No Correlation
0.29
1 player
C Pavely
2 player
K George
Weak Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
C Pavely
2 player
A Freeborn
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
C Pavely
2 player
E Jones
Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
C Pavely
2 player
A Campbell
Weak Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
C Pavely
2 player
G Davis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
C Pavely
2 player
E Arlott
Weak Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
C Pavely
2 player
G Potts
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
C Pavely
2 player
H Baker
Weak Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
C Pavely
2 player
D Perrin
Weak Positive Correlation
0.19
1 player
C Webb
2 player
C Pavely
No Correlation
1
1 player
C Webb
2 player
C Webb
Strong Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
C Webb
2 player
K George
No Correlation
-0.1
1 player
C Webb
2 player
A Freeborn
No Correlation
0.39
1 player
C Webb
2 player
E Jones
Weak Positive Correlation
0.53
1 player
C Webb
2 player
A Campbell
Positive Correlation
0.05
1 player
C Webb
2 player
G Davis
No Correlation
0.01
1 player
C Webb
2 player
E Arlott
No Correlation
0.05
1 player
C Webb
2 player
G Potts
No Correlation
0.45
1 player
C Webb
2 player
H Baker
Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
C Webb
2 player
D Perrin
Positive Correlation
0.29
1 player
K George
2 player
C Pavely
Weak Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
K George
2 player
C Webb
No Correlation
1
1 player
K George
2 player
K George
Strong Positive Correlation
0.04
1 player
K George
2 player
A Freeborn
No Correlation
0.48
1 player
K George
2 player
E Jones
Positive Correlation
0.16
1 player
K George
2 player
A Campbell
No Correlation
0.32
1 player
K George
2 player
G Davis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
K George
2 player
E Arlott
Weak Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
K George
2 player
G Potts
No Correlation
0.19
1 player
K George
2 player
H Baker
No Correlation
0.21
1 player
K George
2 player
D Perrin
Weak Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
A Freeborn
2 player
C Pavely
No Correlation
-0.1
1 player
A Freeborn
2 player
C Webb
No Correlation
0.04
1 player
A Freeborn
2 player
K George
No Correlation
1
1 player
A Freeborn
2 player
A Freeborn
Strong Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
A Freeborn
2 player
E Jones
Weak Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
A Freeborn
2 player
A Campbell
Weak Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
A Freeborn
2 player
G Davis
No Correlation
-0.03
1 player
A Freeborn
2 player
E Arlott
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
A Freeborn
2 player
G Potts
Weak Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
A Freeborn
2 player
H Baker
No Correlation
0.31
1 player
A Freeborn
2 player
D Perrin
Weak Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
E Jones
2 player
C Pavely
Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
E Jones
2 player
C Webb
Weak Positive Correlation
0.48
1 player
E Jones
2 player
K George
Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
E Jones
2 player
A Freeborn
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
E Jones
2 player
E Jones
Strong Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
E Jones
2 player
A Campbell
Weak Positive Correlation
0.45
1 player
E Jones
2 player
G Davis
Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
E Jones
2 player
E Arlott
Weak Positive Correlation
0.41
1 player
E Jones
2 player
G Potts
Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
E Jones
2 player
H Baker
Weak Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
E Jones
2 player
D Perrin
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
A Campbell
2 player
C Pavely
Weak Positive Correlation
0.53
1 player
A Campbell
2 player
C Webb
Positive Correlation
0.16
1 player
A Campbell
2 player
K George
No Correlation
0.38
1 player
A Campbell
2 player
A Freeborn
Weak Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
A Campbell
2 player
E Jones
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
A Campbell
2 player
A Campbell
Strong Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
A Campbell
2 player
G Davis
No Correlation
-0.06
1 player
A Campbell
2 player
E Arlott
No Correlation
0.06
1 player
A Campbell
2 player
G Potts
No Correlation
0.37
1 player
A Campbell
2 player
H Baker
Weak Positive Correlation
0.46
1 player
A Campbell
2 player
D Perrin
Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
G Davis
2 player
C Pavely
Weak Positive Correlation
0.05
1 player
G Davis
2 player
C Webb
No Correlation
0.32
1 player
G Davis
2 player
K George
Weak Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
G Davis
2 player
A Freeborn
No Correlation
0.45
1 player
G Davis
2 player
E Jones
Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
G Davis
2 player
A Campbell
No Correlation
1
1 player
G Davis
2 player
G Davis
Strong Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
G Davis
2 player
E Arlott
Weak Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
G Davis
2 player
G Potts
Weak Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
G Davis
2 player
H Baker
Weak Positive Correlation
0.06
1 player
G Davis
2 player
D Perrin
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
E Arlott
2 player
C Pavely
Weak Positive Correlation
0.01
1 player
E Arlott
2 player
C Webb
No Correlation
0.24
1 player
E Arlott
2 player
K George
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.03
1 player
E Arlott
2 player
A Freeborn
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
E Arlott
2 player
E Jones
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.06
1 player
E Arlott
2 player
A Campbell
No Correlation
0.32
1 player
E Arlott
2 player
G Davis
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
E Arlott
2 player
E Arlott
Strong Positive Correlation
0.05
1 player
E Arlott
2 player
G Potts
No Correlation
0.17
1 player
E Arlott
2 player
H Baker
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
E Arlott
2 player
D Perrin
No Correlation
0.27
1 player
G Potts
2 player
C Pavely
Weak Positive Correlation
0.05
1 player
G Potts
2 player
C Webb
No Correlation
0.17
1 player
G Potts
2 player
K George
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
G Potts
2 player
A Freeborn
Weak Positive Correlation
0.41
1 player
G Potts
2 player
E Jones
Positive Correlation
0.06
1 player
G Potts
2 player
A Campbell
No Correlation
0.36
1 player
G Potts
2 player
G Davis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.05
1 player
G Potts
2 player
E Arlott
No Correlation
1
1 player
G Potts
2 player
G Potts
Strong Positive Correlation
0.01
1 player
G Potts
2 player
H Baker
No Correlation
0.32
1 player
G Potts
2 player
D Perrin
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
H Baker
2 player
C Pavely
Weak Positive Correlation
0.45
1 player
H Baker
2 player
C Webb
Positive Correlation
0.19
1 player
H Baker
2 player
K George
No Correlation
0.07
1 player
H Baker
2 player
A Freeborn
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
H Baker
2 player
E Jones
Weak Positive Correlation
0.37
1 player
H Baker
2 player
A Campbell
Weak Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
H Baker
2 player
G Davis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
H Baker
2 player
E Arlott
No Correlation
0.01
1 player
H Baker
2 player
G Potts
No Correlation
1
1 player
H Baker
2 player
H Baker
Strong Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
H Baker
2 player
D Perrin
Weak Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
D Perrin
2 player
C Pavely
Weak Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
D Perrin
2 player
C Webb
Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
D Perrin
2 player
K George
Weak Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
D Perrin
2 player
A Freeborn
Weak Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
D Perrin
2 player
E Jones
Weak Positive Correlation
0.46
1 player
D Perrin
2 player
A Campbell
Positive Correlation
0.06
1 player
D Perrin
2 player
G Davis
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
D Perrin
2 player
E Arlott
No Correlation
0.32
1 player
D Perrin
2 player
G Potts
Weak Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
D Perrin
2 player
H Baker
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
D Perrin
2 player
D Perrin
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

No data found

High Performing Players

1 E Arlott

AR
Similar Perfomance
C Pavely 0.35
E Jones 0.33
G Davis 0.32
K George 0.24
H Baker 0.17
G Potts 0.05
C Webb 0.01
Opposite Perfomance
D Perrin -0.14
A Campbell -0.06
A Freeborn -0.03

2 E Jones

BAT
Similar Perfomance
K George 0.48
G Davis 0.45
G Potts 0.41
C Pavely 0.4
C Webb 0.39
A Campbell 0.36
E Arlott 0.33
A Freeborn 0.25
D Perrin 0.24
H Baker 0.23

3 G Potts

BOW
Similar Perfomance
E Jones 0.41
G Davis 0.36
D Perrin 0.32
C Pavely 0.27
A Freeborn 0.23
K George 0.17
A Campbell 0.06
C Webb 0.05
E Arlott 0.05
H Baker 0.01

4 A Freeborn

WK
Similar Perfomance
A Campbell 0.38
D Perrin 0.31
E Jones 0.25
G Potts 0.23
C Pavely 0.17
G Davis 0.07
H Baker 0.07
K George 0.04
Opposite Perfomance
C Webb -0.1
E Arlott -0.03

5 K George

AR
Similar Perfomance
E Jones 0.48
G Davis 0.32
C Pavely 0.29
E Arlott 0.24
D Perrin 0.21
H Baker 0.19
C Webb 0.17
G Potts 0.17
A Campbell 0.16
A Freeborn 0.04

Best BLZ Player Combinations

Best BLZ Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
T Beaumont BAT BLZ
H Graham AR BLZ
K Gordon BOW BLZ
K Bryce AR BLZ
L Higham BOW BLZ
M Kelly BAT BLZ
S Bryce WK BLZ
G Ballinger BOW BLZ
M Kirk BAT BLZ
E Claridge WK BLZ
J Groves BOW BLZ
T Beaumont
H Graham
K Gordon
K Bryce
L Higham
M Kelly
S Bryce
G Ballinger
M Kirk
E Claridge
J Groves
1
1 player
T Beaumont
2 player
T Beaumont
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
T Beaumont
2 player
H Graham
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
T Beaumont
2 player
K Gordon
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
T Beaumont
2 player
K Bryce
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.29
1 player
T Beaumont
2 player
L Higham
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.2
1 player
T Beaumont
2 player
M Kelly
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
T Beaumont
2 player
S Bryce
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.2
1 player
T Beaumont
2 player
G Ballinger
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
T Beaumont
2 player
M Kirk
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
T Beaumont
2 player
E Claridge
No Correlation
0
1 player
T Beaumont
2 player
J Groves
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
H Graham
2 player
T Beaumont
No Correlation
1
1 player
H Graham
2 player
H Graham
Strong Positive Correlation
0.67
1 player
H Graham
2 player
K Gordon
Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
H Graham
2 player
K Bryce
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
H Graham
2 player
L Higham
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
H Graham
2 player
M Kelly
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
H Graham
2 player
S Bryce
Weak Negative Correlation
0.67
1 player
H Graham
2 player
G Ballinger
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
H Graham
2 player
M Kirk
Negative Correlation
-0.67
1 player
H Graham
2 player
E Claridge
Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
H Graham
2 player
J Groves
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
T Beaumont
No Correlation
0.67
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
H Graham
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
K Gordon
Strong Positive Correlation
0.53
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
K Bryce
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
L Higham
No Correlation
-0.11
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
M Kelly
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
S Bryce
No Correlation
0.06
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
G Ballinger
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
M Kirk
Negative Correlation
-1
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
E Claridge
Strong Negative Correlation
0
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
J Groves
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
K Bryce
2 player
T Beaumont
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
K Bryce
2 player
H Graham
Weak Positive Correlation
0.53
1 player
K Bryce
2 player
K Gordon
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
K Bryce
2 player
K Bryce
Strong Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
K Bryce
2 player
L Higham
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.4
1 player
K Bryce
2 player
M Kelly
Weak Negative Correlation
0.4
1 player
K Bryce
2 player
S Bryce
Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
K Bryce
2 player
G Ballinger
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.71
1 player
K Bryce
2 player
M Kirk
Negative Correlation
-0.69
1 player
K Bryce
2 player
E Claridge
Negative Correlation
-0.12
1 player
K Bryce
2 player
J Groves
No Correlation
-0.29
1 player
L Higham
2 player
T Beaumont
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
L Higham
2 player
H Graham
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
L Higham
2 player
K Gordon
No Correlation
0.22
1 player
L Higham
2 player
K Bryce
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
L Higham
2 player
L Higham
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.37
1 player
L Higham
2 player
M Kelly
Weak Negative Correlation
0.16
1 player
L Higham
2 player
S Bryce
No Correlation
-0.11
1 player
L Higham
2 player
G Ballinger
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
L Higham
2 player
M Kirk
Positive Correlation
-0.09
1 player
L Higham
2 player
E Claridge
No Correlation
0.38
1 player
L Higham
2 player
J Groves
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.2
1 player
M Kelly
2 player
T Beaumont
No Correlation
0
1 player
M Kelly
2 player
H Graham
No Correlation
-0.11
1 player
M Kelly
2 player
K Gordon
No Correlation
-0.4
1 player
M Kelly
2 player
K Bryce
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.37
1 player
M Kelly
2 player
L Higham
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
M Kelly
2 player
M Kelly
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.1
1 player
M Kelly
2 player
S Bryce
No Correlation
0.1
1 player
M Kelly
2 player
G Ballinger
No Correlation
0
1 player
M Kelly
2 player
M Kirk
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
M Kelly
2 player
E Claridge
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.2
1 player
M Kelly
2 player
J Groves
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
S Bryce
2 player
T Beaumont
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
S Bryce
2 player
H Graham
Weak Negative Correlation
0.11
1 player
S Bryce
2 player
K Gordon
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
S Bryce
2 player
K Bryce
Positive Correlation
0.16
1 player
S Bryce
2 player
L Higham
No Correlation
-0.1
1 player
S Bryce
2 player
M Kelly
No Correlation
1
1 player
S Bryce
2 player
S Bryce
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.2
1 player
S Bryce
2 player
G Ballinger
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
S Bryce
2 player
M Kirk
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
S Bryce
2 player
E Claridge
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.07
1 player
S Bryce
2 player
J Groves
No Correlation
-0.2
1 player
G Ballinger
2 player
T Beaumont
No Correlation
0.67
1 player
G Ballinger
2 player
H Graham
Positive Correlation
0.06
1 player
G Ballinger
2 player
K Gordon
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
G Ballinger
2 player
K Bryce
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.11
1 player
G Ballinger
2 player
L Higham
No Correlation
0.1
1 player
G Ballinger
2 player
M Kelly
No Correlation
-0.2
1 player
G Ballinger
2 player
S Bryce
No Correlation
1
1 player
G Ballinger
2 player
G Ballinger
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.43
1 player
G Ballinger
2 player
M Kirk
Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
G Ballinger
2 player
E Claridge
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.25
1 player
G Ballinger
2 player
J Groves
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
M Kirk
2 player
T Beaumont
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
M Kirk
2 player
H Graham
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
M Kirk
2 player
K Gordon
Negative Correlation
-0.71
1 player
M Kirk
2 player
K Bryce
Negative Correlation
0.42
1 player
M Kirk
2 player
L Higham
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
M Kirk
2 player
M Kelly
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
M Kirk
2 player
S Bryce
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.43
1 player
M Kirk
2 player
G Ballinger
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
M Kirk
2 player
M Kirk
Strong Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
M Kirk
2 player
E Claridge
Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
M Kirk
2 player
J Groves
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
E Claridge
2 player
T Beaumont
No Correlation
-0.67
1 player
E Claridge
2 player
H Graham
Negative Correlation
-1
1 player
E Claridge
2 player
K Gordon
Strong Negative Correlation
-0.69
1 player
E Claridge
2 player
K Bryce
Negative Correlation
-0.09
1 player
E Claridge
2 player
L Higham
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
E Claridge
2 player
M Kelly
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
E Claridge
2 player
S Bryce
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
E Claridge
2 player
G Ballinger
Weak Negative Correlation
0.42
1 player
E Claridge
2 player
M Kirk
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
E Claridge
2 player
E Claridge
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.17
1 player
E Claridge
2 player
J Groves
No Correlation
0
1 player
J Groves
2 player
T Beaumont
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
J Groves
2 player
H Graham
No Correlation
0
1 player
J Groves
2 player
K Gordon
No Correlation
-0.12
1 player
J Groves
2 player
K Bryce
No Correlation
0.38
1 player
J Groves
2 player
L Higham
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.2
1 player
J Groves
2 player
M Kelly
No Correlation
-0.07
1 player
J Groves
2 player
S Bryce
No Correlation
-0.25
1 player
J Groves
2 player
G Ballinger
Weak Negative Correlation
0.43
1 player
J Groves
2 player
M Kirk
Positive Correlation
-0.17
1 player
J Groves
2 player
E Claridge
No Correlation
1
1 player
J Groves
2 player
J Groves
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick H Graham and K Gordon together
Positive Correlation

Pick T Beaumont and M Kirk together
Negative Correlation

Pick H Graham and E Claridge together
Negative Correlation

Pick K Gordon and M Kirk together
Negative Correlation

Pick K Gordon and E Claridge together
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick K Bryce and M Kirk together
Negative Correlation

Pick K Bryce and E Claridge together
Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 G Ballinger

BOW
Similar Perfomance
H Graham 0.67
K Bryce 0.2
M Kelly 0.1
K Gordon 0.06
Opposite Perfomance
M Kirk -0.43
J Groves -0.25
E Claridge -0.23
T Beaumont -0.2
S Bryce -0.2
L Higham -0.11

2 K Bryce

AR
Similar Perfomance
K Gordon 0.53
S Bryce 0.4
H Graham 0.33
L Higham 0.22
T Beaumont 0.2
G Ballinger 0.2
Opposite Perfomance
M Kirk -0.71
E Claridge -0.69
M Kelly -0.4
J Groves -0.12

3 K Gordon

BOW
Similar Perfomance
H Graham 0.67
K Bryce 0.53
S Bryce 0.11
G Ballinger 0.06
Opposite Perfomance
E Claridge -1
M Kirk -0.7
T Beaumont -0.14
M Kelly -0.11

4 S Bryce

WK
Similar Perfomance
K Bryce 0.4
L Higham 0.16
K Gordon 0.11
Opposite Perfomance
T Beaumont -0.33
H Graham -0.33
M Kirk -0.33
E Claridge -0.33
G Ballinger -0.2
M Kelly -0.1
J Groves -0.07

5 M Kelly

BAT
Similar Perfomance
E Claridge 0.33
G Ballinger 0.1
Opposite Perfomance
K Bryce -0.4
L Higham -0.37
T Beaumont -0.2
J Groves -0.2
K Gordon -0.11
S Bryce -0.1

Best CES Player Combinations

Best CES Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
C Pavely AR CES
C Webb BAT CES
K George AR CES
A Freeborn WK CES
E Jones BAT CES
A Campbell BAT CES
G Davis BOW CES
E Arlott AR CES
G Potts BOW CES
H Baker BOW CES
D Perrin BAT CES
C Pavely
C Webb
K George
A Freeborn
E Jones
A Campbell
G Davis
E Arlott
G Potts
H Baker
D Perrin
1
1 player
C Pavely
2 player
C Pavely
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.11
1 player
C Pavely
2 player
C Webb
No Correlation
0.09
1 player
C Pavely
2 player
K George
No Correlation
-0.09
1 player
C Pavely
2 player
A Freeborn
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
C Pavely
2 player
E Jones
Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
C Pavely
2 player
A Campbell
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.27
1 player
C Pavely
2 player
G Davis
Weak Negative Correlation
0.25
1 player
C Pavely
2 player
E Arlott
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.11
1 player
C Pavely
2 player
G Potts
No Correlation
-0.2
1 player
C Pavely
2 player
H Baker
No Correlation
-0.27
1 player
C Pavely
2 player
D Perrin
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.11
1 player
C Webb
2 player
C Pavely
No Correlation
1
1 player
C Webb
2 player
C Webb
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.45
1 player
C Webb
2 player
K George
Negative Correlation
-0.27
1 player
C Webb
2 player
A Freeborn
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
C Webb
2 player
E Jones
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
C Webb
2 player
A Campbell
No Correlation
-0.64
1 player
C Webb
2 player
G Davis
Negative Correlation
-0.2
1 player
C Webb
2 player
E Arlott
No Correlation
-0.09
1 player
C Webb
2 player
G Potts
No Correlation
0
1 player
C Webb
2 player
H Baker
No Correlation
0.45
1 player
C Webb
2 player
D Perrin
Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
K George
2 player
C Pavely
No Correlation
-0.45
1 player
K George
2 player
C Webb
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
K George
2 player
K George
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.37
1 player
K George
2 player
A Freeborn
Weak Negative Correlation
0.25
1 player
K George
2 player
E Jones
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.43
1 player
K George
2 player
A Campbell
Negative Correlation
0.18
1 player
K George
2 player
G Davis
No Correlation
0.29
1 player
K George
2 player
E Arlott
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
K George
2 player
G Potts
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.12
1 player
K George
2 player
H Baker
No Correlation
-0.41
1 player
K George
2 player
D Perrin
Negative Correlation
-0.09
1 player
A Freeborn
2 player
C Pavely
No Correlation
-0.27
1 player
A Freeborn
2 player
C Webb
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.37
1 player
A Freeborn
2 player
K George
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
A Freeborn
2 player
A Freeborn
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.2
1 player
A Freeborn
2 player
E Jones
No Correlation
0.05
1 player
A Freeborn
2 player
A Campbell
No Correlation
0.16
1 player
A Freeborn
2 player
G Davis
No Correlation
-0.22
1 player
A Freeborn
2 player
E Arlott
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.24
1 player
A Freeborn
2 player
G Potts
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
A Freeborn
2 player
H Baker
No Correlation
0.18
1 player
A Freeborn
2 player
D Perrin
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
E Jones
2 player
C Pavely
Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
E Jones
2 player
C Webb
Weak Negative Correlation
0.25
1 player
E Jones
2 player
K George
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.2
1 player
E Jones
2 player
A Freeborn
No Correlation
1
1 player
E Jones
2 player
E Jones
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.11
1 player
E Jones
2 player
A Campbell
No Correlation
0.62
1 player
E Jones
2 player
G Davis
Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
E Jones
2 player
E Arlott
Weak Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
E Jones
2 player
G Potts
Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
E Jones
2 player
H Baker
No Correlation
-0.43
1 player
E Jones
2 player
D Perrin
Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
A Campbell
2 player
C Pavely
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
A Campbell
2 player
C Webb
No Correlation
-0.43
1 player
A Campbell
2 player
K George
Negative Correlation
0.05
1 player
A Campbell
2 player
A Freeborn
No Correlation
-0.11
1 player
A Campbell
2 player
E Jones
No Correlation
1
1 player
A Campbell
2 player
A Campbell
Strong Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
A Campbell
2 player
G Davis
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.5
1 player
A Campbell
2 player
E Arlott
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
A Campbell
2 player
G Potts
No Correlation
0.06
1 player
A Campbell
2 player
H Baker
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Campbell
2 player
D Perrin
No Correlation
-0.27
1 player
G Davis
2 player
C Pavely
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.64
1 player
G Davis
2 player
C Webb
Negative Correlation
0.18
1 player
G Davis
2 player
K George
No Correlation
0.16
1 player
G Davis
2 player
A Freeborn
No Correlation
0.62
1 player
G Davis
2 player
E Jones
Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
G Davis
2 player
A Campbell
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
G Davis
2 player
G Davis
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
G Davis
2 player
E Arlott
No Correlation
0.29
1 player
G Davis
2 player
G Potts
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
G Davis
2 player
H Baker
No Correlation
-0.29
1 player
G Davis
2 player
D Perrin
Weak Negative Correlation
0.25
1 player
E Arlott
2 player
C Pavely
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.2
1 player
E Arlott
2 player
C Webb
No Correlation
0.29
1 player
E Arlott
2 player
K George
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.22
1 player
E Arlott
2 player
A Freeborn
Weak Negative Correlation
0.3
1 player
E Arlott
2 player
E Jones
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.5
1 player
E Arlott
2 player
A Campbell
Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
E Arlott
2 player
G Davis
No Correlation
1
1 player
E Arlott
2 player
E Arlott
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
E Arlott
2 player
G Potts
No Correlation
0
1 player
E Arlott
2 player
H Baker
No Correlation
-0.5
1 player
E Arlott
2 player
D Perrin
Negative Correlation
-0.11
1 player
G Potts
2 player
C Pavely
No Correlation
-0.09
1 player
G Potts
2 player
C Webb
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
G Potts
2 player
K George
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.24
1 player
G Potts
2 player
A Freeborn
Weak Negative Correlation
0.4
1 player
G Potts
2 player
E Jones
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
G Potts
2 player
A Campbell
No Correlation
0.29
1 player
G Potts
2 player
G Davis
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
G Potts
2 player
E Arlott
No Correlation
1
1 player
G Potts
2 player
G Potts
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.29
1 player
G Potts
2 player
H Baker
Weak Negative Correlation
0.08
1 player
G Potts
2 player
D Perrin
No Correlation
-0.2
1 player
H Baker
2 player
C Pavely
No Correlation
0
1 player
H Baker
2 player
C Webb
No Correlation
-0.12
1 player
H Baker
2 player
K George
No Correlation
0
1 player
H Baker
2 player
A Freeborn
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
H Baker
2 player
E Jones
No Correlation
0.06
1 player
H Baker
2 player
A Campbell
No Correlation
0
1 player
H Baker
2 player
G Davis
No Correlation
0
1 player
H Baker
2 player
E Arlott
No Correlation
-0.29
1 player
H Baker
2 player
G Potts
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
H Baker
2 player
H Baker
Strong Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
H Baker
2 player
D Perrin
No Correlation
-0.27
1 player
D Perrin
2 player
C Pavely
Weak Negative Correlation
0.45
1 player
D Perrin
2 player
C Webb
Positive Correlation
-0.41
1 player
D Perrin
2 player
K George
Negative Correlation
0.18
1 player
D Perrin
2 player
A Freeborn
No Correlation
-0.43
1 player
D Perrin
2 player
E Jones
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
D Perrin
2 player
A Campbell
No Correlation
-0.29
1 player
D Perrin
2 player
G Davis
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.5
1 player
D Perrin
2 player
E Arlott
Negative Correlation
0.08
1 player
D Perrin
2 player
G Potts
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
D Perrin
2 player
H Baker
No Correlation
1
1 player
D Perrin
2 player
D Perrin
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick E Jones and G Davis together
Positive Correlation

Pick C Webb and G Davis together
Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 E Arlott

AR
Similar Perfomance
E Jones 0.3
K George 0.29
C Pavely 0.25
Opposite Perfomance
A Campbell -0.5
D Perrin -0.5
A Freeborn -0.22
C Webb -0.2
G Davis -0.14
G Potts -0.14

2 E Jones

BAT
Similar Perfomance
G Davis 0.62
C Pavely 0.5
G Potts 0.4
E Arlott 0.3
K George 0.25
H Baker 0.14
Opposite Perfomance
D Perrin -0.43
C Webb -0.33
A Freeborn -0.2
A Campbell -0.11

3 A Freeborn

WK
Similar Perfomance
D Perrin 0.18
G Davis 0.16
A Campbell 0.05
Opposite Perfomance
K George -0.37
C Webb -0.27
G Potts -0.24
E Arlott -0.22
E Jones -0.2
C Pavely -0.09

4 K George

AR
Similar Perfomance
E Arlott 0.29
E Jones 0.25
G Potts 0.2
G Davis 0.18
C Pavely 0.09
Opposite Perfomance
C Webb -0.45
A Campbell -0.43
D Perrin -0.41
A Freeborn -0.37
H Baker -0.12

5 H Baker

BOW
Similar Perfomance
E Jones 0.14
D Perrin 0.14
A Campbell 0.06
Opposite Perfomance
G Potts -0.29
C Pavely -0.2
K George -0.12

More on PL Labs

BLZ vs CES

PerfectLineup © 2025. All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer - PerfectLineup is an educational tool providing detailed analysis of sports players based on their past performances. We are not associated with any gaming activity and do not host any kind of paid or free contests or pool games. Our focus is purely on data-driven solutions to enhance our users' knowledge.

Perfect Lineup is not affiliated in any way to and claims no association, in any capacity whatsoever, with the Residents of the states of SIKKIM, ASSAM, ODISHA, TELANGANA, NAGALAND, ANDHRA PRADESH and where otherwise prohibited by law are not eligible to access Perfect Lineup.

This platform is applicable for users 18+ Only