Upcoming
Fixtures
View All
DSG 21 Jan 09:00 pm MICT

Lineup Out

Kingsmead
South Africa T20 League

Best Player Combinations For
DSG vs MICT

How it Works?

This guide is super useful for identifying player combinations that are likely to score big. Use the filters to identify the best player combinations according to specific match scenarios.

Player correlate positively

Both players generally perform similarly when picked together. They either score high together or score low together. Maximise FPts by picking players that correlate positively with top players.

Player correlate negatively

Both players generally perform in an opposite manner. If one player scores high, the other usually scores low. Avoid picking players that correlate negatively with top player

More on PL Labs

DSG vs MICT

Show Player Combinations on the basis of:

Best DSG Player Combinations

Best DSG Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
K Williamson BAT DSG
Naveen-ul-Haq BOW DSG
B King BAT DSG
N Ahmad BOW DSG
M Breetzke BAT DSG
H Klaasen WK DSG
D Pretorius AR DSG
K Maharaj BOW DSG
J Dala BOW DSG
W Mulder AR DSG
Q de Kock WK DSG
K Williamson
Naveen-ul-Haq
B King
N Ahmad
M Breetzke
H Klaasen
D Pretorius
K Maharaj
J Dala
W Mulder
Q de Kock
1
1 player
K Williamson
2 player
K Williamson
Strong Positive Correlation
0.63
1 player
K Williamson
2 player
Naveen-ul-Haq
Positive Correlation
-0.28
1 player
K Williamson
2 player
B King
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.04
1 player
K Williamson
2 player
N Ahmad
No Correlation
0.41
1 player
K Williamson
2 player
M Breetzke
Positive Correlation
0.46
1 player
K Williamson
2 player
H Klaasen
Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
K Williamson
2 player
D Pretorius
Weak Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
K Williamson
2 player
K Maharaj
Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
K Williamson
2 player
J Dala
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.05
1 player
K Williamson
2 player
W Mulder
No Correlation
-0.05
1 player
K Williamson
2 player
Q de Kock
No Correlation
0.63
1 player
Naveen-ul-Haq
2 player
K Williamson
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
Naveen-ul-Haq
2 player
Naveen-ul-Haq
Strong Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
Naveen-ul-Haq
2 player
B King
Weak Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
Naveen-ul-Haq
2 player
N Ahmad
Weak Positive Correlation
0.49
1 player
Naveen-ul-Haq
2 player
M Breetzke
Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
Naveen-ul-Haq
2 player
H Klaasen
Weak Positive Correlation
0.45
1 player
Naveen-ul-Haq
2 player
D Pretorius
Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
Naveen-ul-Haq
2 player
K Maharaj
Weak Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
Naveen-ul-Haq
2 player
J Dala
Weak Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
Naveen-ul-Haq
2 player
W Mulder
Weak Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
Naveen-ul-Haq
2 player
Q de Kock
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.28
1 player
B King
2 player
K Williamson
Weak Negative Correlation
0.35
1 player
B King
2 player
Naveen-ul-Haq
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
B King
2 player
B King
Strong Positive Correlation
0.53
1 player
B King
2 player
N Ahmad
Positive Correlation
0.64
1 player
B King
2 player
M Breetzke
Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
B King
2 player
H Klaasen
Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
B King
2 player
D Pretorius
Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
B King
2 player
K Maharaj
Weak Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
B King
2 player
J Dala
Positive Correlation
0.85
1 player
B King
2 player
W Mulder
Strong Positive Correlation
0.57
1 player
B King
2 player
Q de Kock
Positive Correlation
-0.04
1 player
N Ahmad
2 player
K Williamson
No Correlation
0.34
1 player
N Ahmad
2 player
Naveen-ul-Haq
Weak Positive Correlation
0.53
1 player
N Ahmad
2 player
B King
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
N Ahmad
2 player
N Ahmad
Strong Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
N Ahmad
2 player
M Breetzke
Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
N Ahmad
2 player
H Klaasen
Weak Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
N Ahmad
2 player
D Pretorius
Weak Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
N Ahmad
2 player
K Maharaj
No Correlation
0.57
1 player
N Ahmad
2 player
J Dala
Positive Correlation
0.49
1 player
N Ahmad
2 player
W Mulder
Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
N Ahmad
2 player
Q de Kock
Weak Positive Correlation
0.41
1 player
M Breetzke
2 player
K Williamson
Positive Correlation
0.49
1 player
M Breetzke
2 player
Naveen-ul-Haq
Positive Correlation
0.64
1 player
M Breetzke
2 player
B King
Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
M Breetzke
2 player
N Ahmad
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M Breetzke
2 player
M Breetzke
Strong Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
M Breetzke
2 player
H Klaasen
Weak Positive Correlation
0.56
1 player
M Breetzke
2 player
D Pretorius
Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
M Breetzke
2 player
K Maharaj
Weak Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
M Breetzke
2 player
J Dala
Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
M Breetzke
2 player
W Mulder
Weak Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
M Breetzke
2 player
Q de Kock
Positive Correlation
0.46
1 player
H Klaasen
2 player
K Williamson
Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
H Klaasen
2 player
Naveen-ul-Haq
Weak Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
H Klaasen
2 player
B King
Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
H Klaasen
2 player
N Ahmad
Weak Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
H Klaasen
2 player
M Breetzke
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
H Klaasen
2 player
H Klaasen
Strong Positive Correlation
0.41
1 player
H Klaasen
2 player
D Pretorius
Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
H Klaasen
2 player
K Maharaj
Weak Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
H Klaasen
2 player
J Dala
Positive Correlation
0.29
1 player
H Klaasen
2 player
W Mulder
Weak Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
H Klaasen
2 player
Q de Kock
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
D Pretorius
2 player
K Williamson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.45
1 player
D Pretorius
2 player
Naveen-ul-Haq
Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
D Pretorius
2 player
B King
Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
D Pretorius
2 player
N Ahmad
Weak Positive Correlation
0.56
1 player
D Pretorius
2 player
M Breetzke
Positive Correlation
0.41
1 player
D Pretorius
2 player
H Klaasen
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
D Pretorius
2 player
D Pretorius
Strong Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
D Pretorius
2 player
K Maharaj
Weak Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
D Pretorius
2 player
J Dala
Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
D Pretorius
2 player
W Mulder
Weak Positive Correlation
0.46
1 player
D Pretorius
2 player
Q de Kock
Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
K Maharaj
2 player
K Williamson
Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
K Maharaj
2 player
Naveen-ul-Haq
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
K Maharaj
2 player
B King
Weak Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
K Maharaj
2 player
N Ahmad
No Correlation
0.22
1 player
K Maharaj
2 player
M Breetzke
Weak Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
K Maharaj
2 player
H Klaasen
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
K Maharaj
2 player
D Pretorius
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
K Maharaj
2 player
K Maharaj
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.05
1 player
K Maharaj
2 player
J Dala
No Correlation
0.16
1 player
K Maharaj
2 player
W Mulder
No Correlation
0.15
1 player
K Maharaj
2 player
Q de Kock
No Correlation
-0.25
1 player
J Dala
2 player
K Williamson
Weak Negative Correlation
0.3
1 player
J Dala
2 player
Naveen-ul-Haq
Weak Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
J Dala
2 player
B King
Positive Correlation
0.57
1 player
J Dala
2 player
N Ahmad
Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
J Dala
2 player
M Breetzke
Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
J Dala
2 player
H Klaasen
Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
J Dala
2 player
D Pretorius
Positive Correlation
-0.05
1 player
J Dala
2 player
K Maharaj
No Correlation
1
1 player
J Dala
2 player
J Dala
Strong Positive Correlation
0.6
1 player
J Dala
2 player
W Mulder
Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
J Dala
2 player
Q de Kock
Positive Correlation
-0.05
1 player
W Mulder
2 player
K Williamson
No Correlation
0.31
1 player
W Mulder
2 player
Naveen-ul-Haq
Weak Positive Correlation
0.85
1 player
W Mulder
2 player
B King
Strong Positive Correlation
0.49
1 player
W Mulder
2 player
N Ahmad
Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
W Mulder
2 player
M Breetzke
Weak Positive Correlation
0.29
1 player
W Mulder
2 player
H Klaasen
Weak Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
W Mulder
2 player
D Pretorius
Weak Positive Correlation
0.16
1 player
W Mulder
2 player
K Maharaj
No Correlation
0.6
1 player
W Mulder
2 player
J Dala
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
W Mulder
2 player
W Mulder
Strong Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
W Mulder
2 player
Q de Kock
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.05
1 player
Q de Kock
2 player
K Williamson
No Correlation
0.32
1 player
Q de Kock
2 player
Naveen-ul-Haq
Weak Positive Correlation
0.57
1 player
Q de Kock
2 player
B King
Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
Q de Kock
2 player
N Ahmad
Weak Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
Q de Kock
2 player
M Breetzke
Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
Q de Kock
2 player
H Klaasen
Weak Positive Correlation
0.46
1 player
Q de Kock
2 player
D Pretorius
Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
Q de Kock
2 player
K Maharaj
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
Q de Kock
2 player
J Dala
Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
Q de Kock
2 player
W Mulder
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
Q de Kock
2 player
Q de Kock
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick K Williamson and Naveen-ul-Haq together
Positive Correlation

Pick B King and M Breetzke together
Positive Correlation

Pick B King and J Dala together
Positive Correlation

Pick B King and W Mulder together
Strong Positive Correlation

Pick J Dala and W Mulder together
Positive Correlation

High Performing Players

1 H Klaasen

WK
Similar Perfomance
K Williamson 0.46
B King 0.42
D Pretorius 0.41
J Dala 0.4
Naveen-ul-Haq 0.38
M Breetzke 0.34
Q de Kock 0.31
N Ahmad 0.3
W Mulder 0.29
K Maharaj 0.24

2 W Mulder

AR
Similar Perfomance
B King 0.85
J Dala 0.6
N Ahmad 0.49
Q de Kock 0.35
D Pretorius 0.34
M Breetzke 0.33
Naveen-ul-Haq 0.31
H Klaasen 0.29
K Maharaj 0.16
Opposite Perfomance
K Williamson -0.05

3 M Breetzke

BAT
Similar Perfomance
B King 0.64
D Pretorius 0.56
Naveen-ul-Haq 0.49
N Ahmad 0.43
Q de Kock 0.43
K Williamson 0.41
J Dala 0.4
H Klaasen 0.34
W Mulder 0.33
K Maharaj 0.22

4 K Maharaj

BOW
Similar Perfomance
K Williamson 0.5
Naveen-ul-Haq 0.27
H Klaasen 0.24
B King 0.23
D Pretorius 0.23
M Breetzke 0.22
W Mulder 0.16
Q de Kock 0.15
N Ahmad 0.09
Opposite Perfomance
J Dala -0.05

5 Q de Kock

WK
Similar Perfomance
B King 0.57
J Dala 0.5
D Pretorius 0.46
M Breetzke 0.43
W Mulder 0.35
Naveen-ul-Haq 0.32
H Klaasen 0.31
N Ahmad 0.25
K Maharaj 0.15
Opposite Perfomance
K Williamson -0.05

Best MICT Player Combinations

Best MICT Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
T Boult BOW MICT
D Potgieter AR MICT
C Bosch AR MICT
G Linde AR MICT
R Rickelton WK MICT
R Hendricks BAT MICT
D Brevis BAT MICT
K Rabada BOW MICT
R van der Dussen BAT MICT
C Ingram BAT MICT
Rashid-Khan BOW MICT
T Boult
D Potgieter
C Bosch
G Linde
R Rickelton
R Hendricks
D Brevis
K Rabada
R van der Dussen
C Ingram
Rashid-Khan
1
1 player
T Boult
2 player
T Boult
Strong Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
T Boult
2 player
D Potgieter
Weak Positive Correlation
0.29
1 player
T Boult
2 player
C Bosch
Weak Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
T Boult
2 player
G Linde
Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
T Boult
2 player
R Rickelton
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
T Boult
2 player
R Hendricks
Weak Negative Correlation
0.63
1 player
T Boult
2 player
D Brevis
Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
T Boult
2 player
K Rabada
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.03
1 player
T Boult
2 player
R van der Dussen
No Correlation
0.34
1 player
T Boult
2 player
C Ingram
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
T Boult
2 player
Rashid-Khan
Weak Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
D Potgieter
2 player
T Boult
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
D Potgieter
2 player
D Potgieter
Strong Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
D Potgieter
2 player
C Bosch
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
D Potgieter
2 player
G Linde
Weak Positive Correlation
0.03
1 player
D Potgieter
2 player
R Rickelton
No Correlation
0.01
1 player
D Potgieter
2 player
R Hendricks
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
D Potgieter
2 player
D Brevis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
D Potgieter
2 player
K Rabada
Weak Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
D Potgieter
2 player
R van der Dussen
No Correlation
0.52
1 player
D Potgieter
2 player
C Ingram
Positive Correlation
-0.22
1 player
D Potgieter
2 player
Rashid-Khan
Weak Negative Correlation
0.29
1 player
C Bosch
2 player
T Boult
Weak Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
C Bosch
2 player
D Potgieter
No Correlation
1
1 player
C Bosch
2 player
C Bosch
Strong Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
C Bosch
2 player
G Linde
Weak Positive Correlation
0.37
1 player
C Bosch
2 player
R Rickelton
Weak Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
C Bosch
2 player
R Hendricks
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
C Bosch
2 player
D Brevis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
C Bosch
2 player
K Rabada
Weak Positive Correlation
0.65
1 player
C Bosch
2 player
R van der Dussen
Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
C Bosch
2 player
C Ingram
No Correlation
0.56
1 player
C Bosch
2 player
Rashid-Khan
Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
G Linde
2 player
T Boult
Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
G Linde
2 player
D Potgieter
Weak Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
G Linde
2 player
C Bosch
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
G Linde
2 player
G Linde
Strong Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
G Linde
2 player
R Rickelton
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
G Linde
2 player
R Hendricks
No Correlation
0.31
1 player
G Linde
2 player
D Brevis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
G Linde
2 player
K Rabada
Weak Positive Correlation
0.16
1 player
G Linde
2 player
R van der Dussen
No Correlation
0.04
1 player
G Linde
2 player
C Ingram
No Correlation
0.34
1 player
G Linde
2 player
Rashid-Khan
Weak Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
R Rickelton
2 player
T Boult
Weak Positive Correlation
0.03
1 player
R Rickelton
2 player
D Potgieter
No Correlation
0.37
1 player
R Rickelton
2 player
C Bosch
Weak Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
R Rickelton
2 player
G Linde
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
R Rickelton
2 player
R Rickelton
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
R Rickelton
2 player
R Hendricks
No Correlation
0.27
1 player
R Rickelton
2 player
D Brevis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
R Rickelton
2 player
K Rabada
Weak Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
R Rickelton
2 player
R van der Dussen
Positive Correlation
0.02
1 player
R Rickelton
2 player
C Ingram
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
R Rickelton
2 player
Rashid-Khan
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
R Hendricks
2 player
T Boult
Weak Negative Correlation
0.01
1 player
R Hendricks
2 player
D Potgieter
No Correlation
0.34
1 player
R Hendricks
2 player
C Bosch
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
R Hendricks
2 player
G Linde
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
R Hendricks
2 player
R Rickelton
No Correlation
1
1 player
R Hendricks
2 player
R Hendricks
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.04
1 player
R Hendricks
2 player
D Brevis
No Correlation
-0.15
1 player
R Hendricks
2 player
K Rabada
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
R Hendricks
2 player
R van der Dussen
Positive Correlation
-0.18
1 player
R Hendricks
2 player
C Ingram
No Correlation
0.37
1 player
R Hendricks
2 player
Rashid-Khan
Weak Positive Correlation
0.63
1 player
D Brevis
2 player
T Boult
Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
D Brevis
2 player
D Potgieter
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
D Brevis
2 player
C Bosch
Weak Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
D Brevis
2 player
G Linde
Weak Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
D Brevis
2 player
R Rickelton
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.04
1 player
D Brevis
2 player
R Hendricks
No Correlation
1
1 player
D Brevis
2 player
D Brevis
Strong Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
D Brevis
2 player
K Rabada
Weak Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
D Brevis
2 player
R van der Dussen
No Correlation
0.3
1 player
D Brevis
2 player
C Ingram
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
D Brevis
2 player
Rashid-Khan
Weak Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
K Rabada
2 player
T Boult
Weak Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
K Rabada
2 player
D Potgieter
Weak Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
K Rabada
2 player
C Bosch
Weak Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
K Rabada
2 player
G Linde
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
K Rabada
2 player
R Rickelton
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.15
1 player
K Rabada
2 player
R Hendricks
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
K Rabada
2 player
D Brevis
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
K Rabada
2 player
K Rabada
Strong Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
K Rabada
2 player
R van der Dussen
No Correlation
0.15
1 player
K Rabada
2 player
C Ingram
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
K Rabada
2 player
Rashid-Khan
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.03
1 player
R van der Dussen
2 player
T Boult
No Correlation
0.07
1 player
R van der Dussen
2 player
D Potgieter
No Correlation
0.65
1 player
R van der Dussen
2 player
C Bosch
Positive Correlation
0.16
1 player
R van der Dussen
2 player
G Linde
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
R van der Dussen
2 player
R Rickelton
Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
R van der Dussen
2 player
R Hendricks
Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
R van der Dussen
2 player
D Brevis
No Correlation
0.07
1 player
R van der Dussen
2 player
K Rabada
No Correlation
1
1 player
R van der Dussen
2 player
R van der Dussen
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.17
1 player
R van der Dussen
2 player
C Ingram
No Correlation
0.45
1 player
R van der Dussen
2 player
Rashid-Khan
Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
C Ingram
2 player
T Boult
Weak Positive Correlation
0.52
1 player
C Ingram
2 player
D Potgieter
Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
C Ingram
2 player
C Bosch
No Correlation
0.04
1 player
C Ingram
2 player
G Linde
No Correlation
0.02
1 player
C Ingram
2 player
R Rickelton
No Correlation
-0.18
1 player
C Ingram
2 player
R Hendricks
No Correlation
0.3
1 player
C Ingram
2 player
D Brevis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
C Ingram
2 player
K Rabada
No Correlation
-0.17
1 player
C Ingram
2 player
R van der Dussen
No Correlation
1
1 player
C Ingram
2 player
C Ingram
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.05
1 player
C Ingram
2 player
Rashid-Khan
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
Rashid-Khan
2 player
T Boult
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.22
1 player
Rashid-Khan
2 player
D Potgieter
Weak Negative Correlation
0.56
1 player
Rashid-Khan
2 player
C Bosch
Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
Rashid-Khan
2 player
G Linde
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
Rashid-Khan
2 player
R Rickelton
Weak Positive Correlation
0.37
1 player
Rashid-Khan
2 player
R Hendricks
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
Rashid-Khan
2 player
D Brevis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
Rashid-Khan
2 player
K Rabada
Weak Positive Correlation
0.45
1 player
Rashid-Khan
2 player
R van der Dussen
Positive Correlation
-0.05
1 player
Rashid-Khan
2 player
C Ingram
No Correlation
1
1 player
Rashid-Khan
2 player
Rashid-Khan
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick T Boult and D Brevis together
Positive Correlation

Pick C Bosch and R van der Dussen together
Positive Correlation

High Performing Players

1 R Rickelton

WK
Similar Perfomance
R van der Dussen 0.42
T Boult 0.38
C Bosch 0.37
Rashid-Khan 0.35
D Brevis 0.27
G Linde 0.22
K Rabada 0.2
D Potgieter 0.03
C Ingram 0.02
Opposite Perfomance
R Hendricks -0.14

2 R van der Dussen

BAT
Similar Perfomance
C Bosch 0.65
R Hendricks 0.5
Rashid-Khan 0.45
R Rickelton 0.42
G Linde 0.16
D Brevis 0.11
D Potgieter 0.07
K Rabada 0.07
Opposite Perfomance
C Ingram -0.17
T Boult -0.03

3 G Linde

AR
Similar Perfomance
T Boult 0.42
C Bosch 0.39
Rashid-Khan 0.34
K Rabada 0.32
D Brevis 0.31
R Rickelton 0.22
D Potgieter 0.2
R van der Dussen 0.16
C Ingram 0.04

4 D Brevis

BAT
Similar Perfomance
T Boult 0.63
C Bosch 0.35
Rashid-Khan 0.33
G Linde 0.31
C Ingram 0.3
R Rickelton 0.27
K Rabada 0.23
D Potgieter 0.2
R van der Dussen 0.11
Opposite Perfomance
R Hendricks -0.04

5 K Rabada

BOW
Similar Perfomance
G Linde 0.32
T Boult 0.3
C Bosch 0.27
D Potgieter 0.26
D Brevis 0.23
R Rickelton 0.2
Rashid-Khan 0.2
C Ingram 0.15
R van der Dussen 0.07
Opposite Perfomance
R Hendricks -0.15

Best DSG Player Combinations

Best DSG Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
K Williamson BAT DSG
Naveen-ul-Haq BOW DSG
B King BAT DSG
N Ahmad BOW DSG
M Breetzke BAT DSG
H Klaasen WK DSG
D Pretorius AR DSG
K Maharaj BOW DSG
J Dala BOW DSG
W Mulder AR DSG
Q de Kock WK DSG
K Williamson
Naveen-ul-Haq
B King
N Ahmad
M Breetzke
H Klaasen
D Pretorius
K Maharaj
J Dala
W Mulder
Q de Kock
1
1 player
K Williamson
2 player
K Williamson
Strong Positive Correlation
0.67
1 player
K Williamson
2 player
Naveen-ul-Haq
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
K Williamson
2 player
B King
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
K Williamson
2 player
N Ahmad
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
K Williamson
2 player
M Breetzke
No Correlation
0
1 player
K Williamson
2 player
H Klaasen
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
K Williamson
2 player
D Pretorius
Negative Correlation
0.71
1 player
K Williamson
2 player
K Maharaj
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
K Williamson
2 player
J Dala
Negative Correlation
-0.75
1 player
K Williamson
2 player
W Mulder
Negative Correlation
-0.5
1 player
K Williamson
2 player
Q de Kock
Negative Correlation
0.67
1 player
Naveen-ul-Haq
2 player
K Williamson
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
Naveen-ul-Haq
2 player
Naveen-ul-Haq
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
Naveen-ul-Haq
2 player
B King
Weak Negative Correlation
0.08
1 player
Naveen-ul-Haq
2 player
N Ahmad
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
Naveen-ul-Haq
2 player
M Breetzke
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
Naveen-ul-Haq
2 player
H Klaasen
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
Naveen-ul-Haq
2 player
D Pretorius
No Correlation
-0.2
1 player
Naveen-ul-Haq
2 player
K Maharaj
No Correlation
-0.25
1 player
Naveen-ul-Haq
2 player
J Dala
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.38
1 player
Naveen-ul-Haq
2 player
W Mulder
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.07
1 player
Naveen-ul-Haq
2 player
Q de Kock
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
B King
2 player
K Williamson
Negative Correlation
-0.35
1 player
B King
2 player
Naveen-ul-Haq
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
B King
2 player
B King
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
B King
2 player
N Ahmad
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
B King
2 player
M Breetzke
Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
B King
2 player
H Klaasen
Weak Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
B King
2 player
D Pretorius
Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
B King
2 player
K Maharaj
Weak Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
B King
2 player
J Dala
Positive Correlation
0.67
1 player
B King
2 player
W Mulder
Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
B King
2 player
Q de Kock
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
N Ahmad
2 player
K Williamson
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
N Ahmad
2 player
Naveen-ul-Haq
No Correlation
0
1 player
N Ahmad
2 player
B King
No Correlation
1
1 player
N Ahmad
2 player
N Ahmad
Strong Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
N Ahmad
2 player
M Breetzke
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
N Ahmad
2 player
H Klaasen
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
N Ahmad
2 player
D Pretorius
No Correlation
0.07
1 player
N Ahmad
2 player
K Maharaj
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
N Ahmad
2 player
J Dala
Weak Negative Correlation
0.38
1 player
N Ahmad
2 player
W Mulder
Weak Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
N Ahmad
2 player
Q de Kock
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
M Breetzke
2 player
K Williamson
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
M Breetzke
2 player
Naveen-ul-Haq
Weak Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
M Breetzke
2 player
B King
Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
M Breetzke
2 player
N Ahmad
No Correlation
1
1 player
M Breetzke
2 player
M Breetzke
Strong Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
M Breetzke
2 player
H Klaasen
No Correlation
0
1 player
M Breetzke
2 player
D Pretorius
No Correlation
-0.08
1 player
M Breetzke
2 player
K Maharaj
No Correlation
0.27
1 player
M Breetzke
2 player
J Dala
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
M Breetzke
2 player
W Mulder
No Correlation
0
1 player
M Breetzke
2 player
Q de Kock
No Correlation
0
1 player
H Klaasen
2 player
K Williamson
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
H Klaasen
2 player
Naveen-ul-Haq
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
H Klaasen
2 player
B King
Weak Negative Correlation
0.25
1 player
H Klaasen
2 player
N Ahmad
Weak Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
H Klaasen
2 player
M Breetzke
No Correlation
1
1 player
H Klaasen
2 player
H Klaasen
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.11
1 player
H Klaasen
2 player
D Pretorius
No Correlation
-0.03
1 player
H Klaasen
2 player
K Maharaj
No Correlation
0.09
1 player
H Klaasen
2 player
J Dala
No Correlation
0.1
1 player
H Klaasen
2 player
W Mulder
No Correlation
0.1
1 player
H Klaasen
2 player
Q de Kock
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
D Pretorius
2 player
K Williamson
Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
D Pretorius
2 player
Naveen-ul-Haq
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
D Pretorius
2 player
B King
Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
D Pretorius
2 player
N Ahmad
No Correlation
0
1 player
D Pretorius
2 player
M Breetzke
No Correlation
-0.11
1 player
D Pretorius
2 player
H Klaasen
No Correlation
1
1 player
D Pretorius
2 player
D Pretorius
Strong Positive Correlation
0.06
1 player
D Pretorius
2 player
K Maharaj
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
D Pretorius
2 player
J Dala
Weak Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
D Pretorius
2 player
W Mulder
No Correlation
-0.18
1 player
D Pretorius
2 player
Q de Kock
No Correlation
0.71
1 player
K Maharaj
2 player
K Williamson
Positive Correlation
-0.2
1 player
K Maharaj
2 player
Naveen-ul-Haq
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
K Maharaj
2 player
B King
Weak Negative Correlation
0.07
1 player
K Maharaj
2 player
N Ahmad
No Correlation
-0.08
1 player
K Maharaj
2 player
M Breetzke
No Correlation
-0.03
1 player
K Maharaj
2 player
H Klaasen
No Correlation
0.06
1 player
K Maharaj
2 player
D Pretorius
No Correlation
1
1 player
K Maharaj
2 player
K Maharaj
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.27
1 player
K Maharaj
2 player
J Dala
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.07
1 player
K Maharaj
2 player
W Mulder
No Correlation
-0.36
1 player
K Maharaj
2 player
Q de Kock
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
J Dala
2 player
K Williamson
Negative Correlation
-0.25
1 player
J Dala
2 player
Naveen-ul-Haq
Weak Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
J Dala
2 player
B King
Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
J Dala
2 player
N Ahmad
Weak Negative Correlation
0.27
1 player
J Dala
2 player
M Breetzke
Weak Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
J Dala
2 player
H Klaasen
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
J Dala
2 player
D Pretorius
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.27
1 player
J Dala
2 player
K Maharaj
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
J Dala
2 player
J Dala
Strong Positive Correlation
0.6
1 player
J Dala
2 player
W Mulder
Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
J Dala
2 player
Q de Kock
No Correlation
-0.75
1 player
W Mulder
2 player
K Williamson
Negative Correlation
-0.38
1 player
W Mulder
2 player
Naveen-ul-Haq
Weak Negative Correlation
0.67
1 player
W Mulder
2 player
B King
Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
W Mulder
2 player
N Ahmad
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
W Mulder
2 player
M Breetzke
No Correlation
0.1
1 player
W Mulder
2 player
H Klaasen
No Correlation
0.18
1 player
W Mulder
2 player
D Pretorius
No Correlation
-0.07
1 player
W Mulder
2 player
K Maharaj
No Correlation
0.6
1 player
W Mulder
2 player
J Dala
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
W Mulder
2 player
W Mulder
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
W Mulder
2 player
Q de Kock
No Correlation
-0.5
1 player
Q de Kock
2 player
K Williamson
Negative Correlation
-0.07
1 player
Q de Kock
2 player
Naveen-ul-Haq
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
Q de Kock
2 player
B King
Weak Negative Correlation
0.07
1 player
Q de Kock
2 player
N Ahmad
No Correlation
0
1 player
Q de Kock
2 player
M Breetzke
No Correlation
0.1
1 player
Q de Kock
2 player
H Klaasen
No Correlation
-0.18
1 player
Q de Kock
2 player
D Pretorius
No Correlation
-0.36
1 player
Q de Kock
2 player
K Maharaj
Weak Negative Correlation
0.09
1 player
Q de Kock
2 player
J Dala
No Correlation
0
1 player
Q de Kock
2 player
W Mulder
No Correlation
1
1 player
Q de Kock
2 player
Q de Kock
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick K Williamson and K Maharaj together
Positive Correlation

Pick B King and D Pretorius together
Positive Correlation

Pick K Williamson and B King together
Negative Correlation

Pick K Williamson and D Pretorius together
Negative Correlation

Pick K Williamson and J Dala together
Negative Correlation

Pick K Williamson and W Mulder together
Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 W Mulder

AR
Similar Perfomance
B King 0.67
J Dala 0.6
N Ahmad 0.38
D Pretorius 0.18
H Klaasen 0.1
Opposite Perfomance
K Williamson -0.75
Naveen-ul-Haq -0.38
K Maharaj -0.07

2 H Klaasen

WK
Similar Perfomance
Naveen-ul-Haq 0.25
N Ahmad 0.25
M Breetzke 0.11
W Mulder 0.1
Q de Kock 0.1
J Dala 0.09
Opposite Perfomance
B King -0.33
D Pretorius -0.11
K Maharaj -0.03

3 K Maharaj

BOW
Similar Perfomance
K Williamson 0.71
N Ahmad 0.07
D Pretorius 0.06
Opposite Perfomance
Q de Kock -0.36
B King -0.33
J Dala -0.27
Naveen-ul-Haq -0.2
M Breetzke -0.08
W Mulder -0.07
H Klaasen -0.03

4 Q de Kock

WK
Similar Perfomance
H Klaasen 0.1
J Dala 0.09
N Ahmad 0.07
Opposite Perfomance
K Williamson -0.5
K Maharaj -0.36
B King -0.33
D Pretorius -0.18
Naveen-ul-Haq -0.07

5 D Pretorius

AR
Similar Perfomance
B King 0.7
J Dala 0.33
W Mulder 0.18
Naveen-ul-Haq 0.14
N Ahmad 0.14
K Maharaj 0.06
Opposite Perfomance
K Williamson -0.7
Q de Kock -0.18
H Klaasen -0.11

Best MICT Player Combinations

Best MICT Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
T Boult BOW MICT
D Potgieter AR MICT
C Bosch AR MICT
G Linde AR MICT
R Rickelton WK MICT
R Hendricks BAT MICT
D Brevis BAT MICT
K Rabada BOW MICT
R van der Dussen BAT MICT
C Ingram BAT MICT
Rashid-Khan BOW MICT
T Boult
D Potgieter
C Bosch
G Linde
R Rickelton
R Hendricks
D Brevis
K Rabada
R van der Dussen
C Ingram
Rashid-Khan
1
1 player
T Boult
2 player
T Boult
Strong Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
T Boult
2 player
D Potgieter
No Correlation
0
1 player
T Boult
2 player
C Bosch
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
T Boult
2 player
G Linde
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
T Boult
2 player
R Rickelton
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.64
1 player
T Boult
2 player
R Hendricks
Negative Correlation
0.64
1 player
T Boult
2 player
D Brevis
Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
T Boult
2 player
K Rabada
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.27
1 player
T Boult
2 player
R van der Dussen
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
T Boult
2 player
C Ingram
No Correlation
-0.09
1 player
T Boult
2 player
Rashid-Khan
No Correlation
0.09
1 player
D Potgieter
2 player
T Boult
No Correlation
1
1 player
D Potgieter
2 player
D Potgieter
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
D Potgieter
2 player
C Bosch
Weak Negative Correlation
0.16
1 player
D Potgieter
2 player
G Linde
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
D Potgieter
2 player
R Rickelton
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.29
1 player
D Potgieter
2 player
R Hendricks
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.1
1 player
D Potgieter
2 player
D Brevis
No Correlation
0.38
1 player
D Potgieter
2 player
K Rabada
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.1
1 player
D Potgieter
2 player
R van der Dussen
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
D Potgieter
2 player
C Ingram
No Correlation
-0.67
1 player
D Potgieter
2 player
Rashid-Khan
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
C Bosch
2 player
T Boult
No Correlation
-0.25
1 player
C Bosch
2 player
D Potgieter
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
C Bosch
2 player
C Bosch
Strong Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
C Bosch
2 player
G Linde
No Correlation
0.43
1 player
C Bosch
2 player
R Rickelton
Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
C Bosch
2 player
R Hendricks
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
C Bosch
2 player
D Brevis
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
C Bosch
2 player
K Rabada
No Correlation
0.75
1 player
C Bosch
2 player
R van der Dussen
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
C Bosch
2 player
C Ingram
Negative Correlation
0.5
1 player
C Bosch
2 player
Rashid-Khan
Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
G Linde
2 player
T Boult
Weak Positive Correlation
0.16
1 player
G Linde
2 player
D Potgieter
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
G Linde
2 player
C Bosch
No Correlation
1
1 player
G Linde
2 player
G Linde
Strong Positive Correlation
0.05
1 player
G Linde
2 player
R Rickelton
No Correlation
-0.43
1 player
G Linde
2 player
R Hendricks
Negative Correlation
0.15
1 player
G Linde
2 player
D Brevis
No Correlation
0.13
1 player
G Linde
2 player
K Rabada
No Correlation
0.15
1 player
G Linde
2 player
R van der Dussen
No Correlation
-0.25
1 player
G Linde
2 player
C Ingram
Weak Negative Correlation
0.18
1 player
G Linde
2 player
Rashid-Khan
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
R Rickelton
2 player
T Boult
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
R Rickelton
2 player
D Potgieter
Weak Negative Correlation
0.43
1 player
R Rickelton
2 player
C Bosch
Positive Correlation
0.05
1 player
R Rickelton
2 player
G Linde
No Correlation
1
1 player
R Rickelton
2 player
R Rickelton
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.09
1 player
R Rickelton
2 player
R Hendricks
No Correlation
0.09
1 player
R Rickelton
2 player
D Brevis
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
R Rickelton
2 player
K Rabada
Weak Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
R Rickelton
2 player
R van der Dussen
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
R Rickelton
2 player
C Ingram
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
R Rickelton
2 player
Rashid-Khan
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.64
1 player
R Hendricks
2 player
T Boult
Negative Correlation
-0.29
1 player
R Hendricks
2 player
D Potgieter
Weak Negative Correlation
0.25
1 player
R Hendricks
2 player
C Bosch
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.43
1 player
R Hendricks
2 player
G Linde
Negative Correlation
-0.09
1 player
R Hendricks
2 player
R Rickelton
No Correlation
1
1 player
R Hendricks
2 player
R Hendricks
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.6
1 player
R Hendricks
2 player
D Brevis
Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
R Hendricks
2 player
K Rabada
Weak Negative Correlation
0.6
1 player
R Hendricks
2 player
R van der Dussen
Positive Correlation
-0.5
1 player
R Hendricks
2 player
C Ingram
Negative Correlation
0.38
1 player
R Hendricks
2 player
Rashid-Khan
Weak Positive Correlation
0.64
1 player
D Brevis
2 player
T Boult
Positive Correlation
-0.1
1 player
D Brevis
2 player
D Potgieter
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
D Brevis
2 player
C Bosch
Weak Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
D Brevis
2 player
G Linde
No Correlation
0.09
1 player
D Brevis
2 player
R Rickelton
No Correlation
-0.6
1 player
D Brevis
2 player
R Hendricks
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
D Brevis
2 player
D Brevis
Strong Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
D Brevis
2 player
K Rabada
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.36
1 player
D Brevis
2 player
R van der Dussen
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.11
1 player
D Brevis
2 player
C Ingram
No Correlation
0
1 player
D Brevis
2 player
Rashid-Khan
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
K Rabada
2 player
T Boult
Weak Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
K Rabada
2 player
D Potgieter
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
K Rabada
2 player
C Bosch
No Correlation
0.13
1 player
K Rabada
2 player
G Linde
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
K Rabada
2 player
R Rickelton
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
K Rabada
2 player
R Hendricks
Weak Negative Correlation
0.25
1 player
K Rabada
2 player
D Brevis
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
K Rabada
2 player
K Rabada
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.2
1 player
K Rabada
2 player
R van der Dussen
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
K Rabada
2 player
C Ingram
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.12
1 player
K Rabada
2 player
Rashid-Khan
No Correlation
-0.27
1 player
R van der Dussen
2 player
T Boult
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.1
1 player
R van der Dussen
2 player
D Potgieter
No Correlation
0.75
1 player
R van der Dussen
2 player
C Bosch
Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
R van der Dussen
2 player
G Linde
No Correlation
0.3
1 player
R van der Dussen
2 player
R Rickelton
Weak Positive Correlation
0.6
1 player
R van der Dussen
2 player
R Hendricks
Positive Correlation
-0.36
1 player
R van der Dussen
2 player
D Brevis
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.2
1 player
R van der Dussen
2 player
K Rabada
No Correlation
1
1 player
R van der Dussen
2 player
R van der Dussen
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.5
1 player
R van der Dussen
2 player
C Ingram
Negative Correlation
0.47
1 player
R van der Dussen
2 player
Rashid-Khan
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
C Ingram
2 player
T Boult
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
C Ingram
2 player
D Potgieter
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
C Ingram
2 player
C Bosch
Negative Correlation
-0.25
1 player
C Ingram
2 player
G Linde
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
C Ingram
2 player
R Rickelton
No Correlation
-0.5
1 player
C Ingram
2 player
R Hendricks
Negative Correlation
-0.11
1 player
C Ingram
2 player
D Brevis
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
C Ingram
2 player
K Rabada
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.5
1 player
C Ingram
2 player
R van der Dussen
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
C Ingram
2 player
C Ingram
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.5
1 player
C Ingram
2 player
Rashid-Khan
Negative Correlation
-0.09
1 player
Rashid-Khan
2 player
T Boult
No Correlation
-0.67
1 player
Rashid-Khan
2 player
D Potgieter
Negative Correlation
0.5
1 player
Rashid-Khan
2 player
C Bosch
Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
Rashid-Khan
2 player
G Linde
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
Rashid-Khan
2 player
R Rickelton
Weak Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
Rashid-Khan
2 player
R Hendricks
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
Rashid-Khan
2 player
D Brevis
No Correlation
-0.12
1 player
Rashid-Khan
2 player
K Rabada
No Correlation
0.47
1 player
Rashid-Khan
2 player
R van der Dussen
Positive Correlation
-0.5
1 player
Rashid-Khan
2 player
C Ingram
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
Rashid-Khan
2 player
Rashid-Khan
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick R Hendricks and R van der Dussen together
Positive Correlation

Pick T Boult and R Hendricks together
Negative Correlation

Pick D Potgieter and Rashid-Khan together
Negative Correlation

Pick C Bosch and C Ingram together
Negative Correlation

Pick R Hendricks and D Brevis together
Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 R Rickelton

WK
Similar Perfomance
C Bosch 0.43
R van der Dussen 0.3
T Boult 0.25
Rashid-Khan 0.23
K Rabada 0.2
D Brevis 0.09
G Linde 0.05
Opposite Perfomance
D Potgieter -0.33
C Ingram -0.14
R Hendricks -0.09

2 G Linde

AR
Similar Perfomance
T Boult 0.2
Rashid-Khan 0.18
D Potgieter 0.16
D Brevis 0.15
R van der Dussen 0.15
C Bosch 0.14
K Rabada 0.13
R Rickelton 0.05
Opposite Perfomance
R Hendricks -0.43
C Ingram -0.25

3 R van der Dussen

BAT
Similar Perfomance
C Bosch 0.75
R Hendricks 0.6
Rashid-Khan 0.47
R Rickelton 0.3
G Linde 0.15
Opposite Perfomance
C Ingram -0.5
D Brevis -0.36
T Boult -0.27
K Rabada -0.2
D Potgieter -0.1

4 D Brevis

BAT
Similar Perfomance
T Boult 0.64
C Bosch 0.25
K Rabada 0.25
G Linde 0.15
R Rickelton 0.09
Opposite Perfomance
R Hendricks -0.6
R van der Dussen -0.36
C Ingram -0.11
D Potgieter -0.1

5 Rashid-Khan

BOW
Similar Perfomance
C Bosch 0.5
R van der Dussen 0.47
R Hendricks 0.38
R Rickelton 0.23
G Linde 0.18
Opposite Perfomance
D Potgieter -0.67
C Ingram -0.5
K Rabada -0.12
T Boult -0.09

More on PL Labs

DSG vs MICT

PerfectLineup © 2025. All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer - PerfectLineup is an educational tool providing detailed analysis of sports players based on their past performances. We are not associated with any gaming activity and do not host any kind of paid or free contests or pool games. Our focus is purely on data-driven solutions to enhance our users' knowledge.

Perfect Lineup is not affiliated in any way to and claims no association, in any capacity whatsoever, with the Residents of the states of SIKKIM, ASSAM, ODISHA, TELANGANA, NAGALAND, ANDHRA PRADESH and where otherwise prohibited by law are not eligible to access Perfect Lineup.

This platform is applicable for users 18+ Only