Upcoming
Fixtures
View All
LAN 30 May 11:30 pm DUR

Lineup Out

Old Trafford
English T20 Blast

Best Player Combinations For
LAN vs DUR

How it Works?

This guide is super useful for identifying player combinations that are likely to score big. Use the filters to identify the best player combinations according to specific match scenarios.

Player correlate positively

Both players generally perform similarly when picked together. They either score high together or score low together. Maximise FPts by picking players that correlate positively with top players.

Player correlate negatively

Both players generally perform in an opposite manner. If one player scores high, the other usually scores low. Avoid picking players that correlate negatively with top player

More on PL Labs

LAN vs DUR

Show Player Combinations on the basis of:

Best LAN Player Combinations

Best LAN Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

No data found

No data found

No data found

Best DUR Player Combinations

Best DUR Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
A Turner BAT DUR
B Dwarshuis BOW DUR
M Jones BAT DUR
O George-Robinson WK DUR
N Sowter BOW DUR
A Lees BAT DUR
B Raine BOW DUR
G Clark BAT DUR
M Potts BOW DUR
C Parkinson BOW DUR
C Ackermann AR DUR
A Turner
B Dwarshuis
M Jones
O George-Robinson
N Sowter
A Lees
B Raine
G Clark
M Potts
C Parkinson
C Ackermann
1
1 player
A Turner
2 player
A Turner
Strong Positive Correlation
0.29
1 player
A Turner
2 player
B Dwarshuis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
A Turner
2 player
M Jones
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
A Turner
2 player
O George-Robinson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
A Turner
2 player
N Sowter
Weak Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
A Turner
2 player
A Lees
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
A Turner
2 player
B Raine
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
A Turner
2 player
G Clark
Weak Positive Correlation
0.51
1 player
A Turner
2 player
M Potts
Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
A Turner
2 player
C Parkinson
Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
A Turner
2 player
C Ackermann
Weak Positive Correlation
0.29
1 player
B Dwarshuis
2 player
A Turner
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
B Dwarshuis
2 player
B Dwarshuis
Strong Positive Correlation
0.29
1 player
B Dwarshuis
2 player
M Jones
Weak Positive Correlation
0.44
1 player
B Dwarshuis
2 player
O George-Robinson
Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
B Dwarshuis
2 player
N Sowter
Weak Positive Correlation
0.19
1 player
B Dwarshuis
2 player
A Lees
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
B Dwarshuis
2 player
B Raine
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
B Dwarshuis
2 player
G Clark
Weak Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
B Dwarshuis
2 player
M Potts
No Correlation
0.12
1 player
B Dwarshuis
2 player
C Parkinson
No Correlation
0.46
1 player
B Dwarshuis
2 player
C Ackermann
Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
M Jones
2 player
A Turner
Weak Positive Correlation
0.29
1 player
M Jones
2 player
B Dwarshuis
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M Jones
2 player
M Jones
Strong Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
M Jones
2 player
O George-Robinson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
M Jones
2 player
N Sowter
No Correlation
0.49
1 player
M Jones
2 player
A Lees
Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
M Jones
2 player
B Raine
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
M Jones
2 player
G Clark
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
M Jones
2 player
M Potts
Weak Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
M Jones
2 player
C Parkinson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
M Jones
2 player
C Ackermann
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
O George-Robinson
2 player
A Turner
Weak Positive Correlation
0.44
1 player
O George-Robinson
2 player
B Dwarshuis
Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
O George-Robinson
2 player
M Jones
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
O George-Robinson
2 player
O George-Robinson
Strong Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
O George-Robinson
2 player
N Sowter
Weak Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
O George-Robinson
2 player
A Lees
Weak Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
O George-Robinson
2 player
B Raine
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
O George-Robinson
2 player
G Clark
Weak Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
O George-Robinson
2 player
M Potts
Weak Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
O George-Robinson
2 player
C Parkinson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
O George-Robinson
2 player
C Ackermann
Weak Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
N Sowter
2 player
A Turner
Weak Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
N Sowter
2 player
B Dwarshuis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
N Sowter
2 player
M Jones
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
N Sowter
2 player
O George-Robinson
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
N Sowter
2 player
N Sowter
Strong Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
N Sowter
2 player
A Lees
Weak Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
N Sowter
2 player
B Raine
Weak Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
N Sowter
2 player
G Clark
No Correlation
0.01
1 player
N Sowter
2 player
M Potts
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
N Sowter
2 player
C Parkinson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.44
1 player
N Sowter
2 player
C Ackermann
Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
A Lees
2 player
A Turner
No Correlation
0.19
1 player
A Lees
2 player
B Dwarshuis
No Correlation
0.49
1 player
A Lees
2 player
M Jones
Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
A Lees
2 player
O George-Robinson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
A Lees
2 player
N Sowter
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
A Lees
2 player
A Lees
Strong Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
A Lees
2 player
B Raine
No Correlation
0.36
1 player
A Lees
2 player
G Clark
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.26
1 player
A Lees
2 player
M Potts
Weak Negative Correlation
0.31
1 player
A Lees
2 player
C Parkinson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.44
1 player
A Lees
2 player
C Ackermann
Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
B Raine
2 player
A Turner
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
B Raine
2 player
B Dwarshuis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
B Raine
2 player
M Jones
Weak Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
B Raine
2 player
O George-Robinson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
B Raine
2 player
N Sowter
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
B Raine
2 player
A Lees
No Correlation
1
1 player
B Raine
2 player
B Raine
Strong Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
B Raine
2 player
G Clark
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
B Raine
2 player
M Potts
Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
B Raine
2 player
C Parkinson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.44
1 player
B Raine
2 player
C Ackermann
Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
G Clark
2 player
A Turner
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
G Clark
2 player
B Dwarshuis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
G Clark
2 player
M Jones
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
G Clark
2 player
O George-Robinson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
G Clark
2 player
N Sowter
No Correlation
0.36
1 player
G Clark
2 player
A Lees
Weak Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
G Clark
2 player
B Raine
No Correlation
1
1 player
G Clark
2 player
G Clark
Strong Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
G Clark
2 player
M Potts
Weak Positive Correlation
0.02
1 player
G Clark
2 player
C Parkinson
No Correlation
0.15
1 player
G Clark
2 player
C Ackermann
No Correlation
0.51
1 player
M Potts
2 player
A Turner
Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
M Potts
2 player
B Dwarshuis
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
M Potts
2 player
M Jones
Weak Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
M Potts
2 player
O George-Robinson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.01
1 player
M Potts
2 player
N Sowter
No Correlation
-0.26
1 player
M Potts
2 player
A Lees
Weak Negative Correlation
0.42
1 player
M Potts
2 player
B Raine
Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
M Potts
2 player
G Clark
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M Potts
2 player
M Potts
Strong Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
M Potts
2 player
C Parkinson
No Correlation
-0.23
1 player
M Potts
2 player
C Ackermann
Weak Negative Correlation
0.47
1 player
C Parkinson
2 player
A Turner
Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
C Parkinson
2 player
B Dwarshuis
No Correlation
0.24
1 player
C Parkinson
2 player
M Jones
Weak Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
C Parkinson
2 player
O George-Robinson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
C Parkinson
2 player
N Sowter
Weak Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
C Parkinson
2 player
A Lees
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
C Parkinson
2 player
B Raine
Weak Positive Correlation
0.02
1 player
C Parkinson
2 player
G Clark
No Correlation
0.09
1 player
C Parkinson
2 player
M Potts
No Correlation
1
1 player
C Parkinson
2 player
C Parkinson
Strong Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
C Parkinson
2 player
C Ackermann
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
C Ackermann
2 player
A Turner
Weak Positive Correlation
0.46
1 player
C Ackermann
2 player
B Dwarshuis
Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
C Ackermann
2 player
M Jones
Weak Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
C Ackermann
2 player
O George-Robinson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.44
1 player
C Ackermann
2 player
N Sowter
Positive Correlation
0.44
1 player
C Ackermann
2 player
A Lees
Positive Correlation
0.44
1 player
C Ackermann
2 player
B Raine
Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
C Ackermann
2 player
G Clark
No Correlation
-0.23
1 player
C Ackermann
2 player
M Potts
Weak Negative Correlation
0.38
1 player
C Ackermann
2 player
C Parkinson
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
C Ackermann
2 player
C Ackermann
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

No data found

High Performing Players

1 B Raine

BOW
Similar Perfomance
C Ackermann 0.44
M Potts 0.42
O George-Robinson 0.31
N Sowter 0.31
A Turner 0.28
B Dwarshuis 0.28
M Jones 0.28
C Parkinson 0.25
A Lees 0.14
G Clark 0.07

2 N Sowter

BOW
Similar Perfomance
C Ackermann 0.44
A Turner 0.36
B Raine 0.31
O George-Robinson 0.28
B Dwarshuis 0.26
A Lees 0.24
C Parkinson 0.23
M Jones 0.15
G Clark 0.1
M Potts 0.01

3 C Parkinson

BOW
Similar Perfomance
A Turner 0.47
C Ackermann 0.38
A Lees 0.31
B Raine 0.25
M Jones 0.24
N Sowter 0.23
O George-Robinson 0.21
B Dwarshuis 0.12
M Potts 0.09
G Clark 0.02

4 A Turner

BAT
Similar Perfomance
M Potts 0.51
C Parkinson 0.47
N Sowter 0.36
B Dwarshuis 0.29
O George-Robinson 0.28
B Raine 0.28
G Clark 0.28
C Ackermann 0.25
M Jones 0.24
A Lees 0.1

5 A Lees

BAT
Similar Perfomance
M Jones 0.49
C Ackermann 0.44
O George-Robinson 0.38
G Clark 0.36
C Parkinson 0.31
N Sowter 0.24
B Dwarshuis 0.19
B Raine 0.14
A Turner 0.1
Opposite Perfomance
M Potts -0.26

Best LAN Player Combinations

Best LAN Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
M Hurst WK LAN
C Green AR LAN
T Bruce BAT LAN
S Croft BAT LAN
J Bohannon BAT LAN
L Wood BOW LAN
J Blatherwick BOW LAN
M Stanley BOW LAN
L Wells AR LAN
T Aspinwall AR LAN
G Bell BAT LAN
M Hurst
C Green
T Bruce
S Croft
J Bohannon
L Wood
J Blatherwick
M Stanley
L Wells
T Aspinwall
G Bell
1
1 player
M Hurst
2 player
M Hurst
Strong Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
M Hurst
2 player
C Green
No Correlation
-0.5
1 player
M Hurst
2 player
T Bruce
Negative Correlation
-0.17
1 player
M Hurst
2 player
S Croft
No Correlation
-0.75
1 player
M Hurst
2 player
J Bohannon
Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
M Hurst
2 player
L Wood
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.25
1 player
M Hurst
2 player
J Blatherwick
Weak Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Hurst
2 player
M Stanley
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
M Hurst
2 player
L Wells
No Correlation
-0.35
1 player
M Hurst
2 player
T Aspinwall
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
M Hurst
2 player
G Bell
Negative Correlation
0.09
1 player
C Green
2 player
M Hurst
No Correlation
1
1 player
C Green
2 player
C Green
Strong Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
C Green
2 player
T Bruce
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.27
1 player
C Green
2 player
S Croft
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.75
1 player
C Green
2 player
J Bohannon
Negative Correlation
-0.27
1 player
C Green
2 player
L Wood
Weak Negative Correlation
0.25
1 player
C Green
2 player
J Blatherwick
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
C Green
2 player
M Stanley
No Correlation
-0.09
1 player
C Green
2 player
L Wells
No Correlation
-0.23
1 player
C Green
2 player
T Aspinwall
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
C Green
2 player
G Bell
No Correlation
-0.5
1 player
T Bruce
2 player
M Hurst
Negative Correlation
0.25
1 player
T Bruce
2 player
C Green
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
T Bruce
2 player
T Bruce
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
T Bruce
2 player
S Croft
Weak Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
T Bruce
2 player
J Bohannon
No Correlation
-0.25
1 player
T Bruce
2 player
L Wood
Weak Negative Correlation
0.43
1 player
T Bruce
2 player
J Blatherwick
Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
T Bruce
2 player
M Stanley
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
T Bruce
2 player
L Wells
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
T Bruce
2 player
T Aspinwall
Weak Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
T Bruce
2 player
G Bell
Positive Correlation
-0.17
1 player
S Croft
2 player
M Hurst
No Correlation
-0.27
1 player
S Croft
2 player
C Green
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.25
1 player
S Croft
2 player
T Bruce
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
S Croft
2 player
S Croft
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.11
1 player
S Croft
2 player
J Bohannon
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
S Croft
2 player
L Wood
No Correlation
-0.4
1 player
S Croft
2 player
J Blatherwick
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
S Croft
2 player
M Stanley
No Correlation
-0.08
1 player
S Croft
2 player
L Wells
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
S Croft
2 player
T Aspinwall
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
S Croft
2 player
G Bell
No Correlation
-0.75
1 player
J Bohannon
2 player
M Hurst
Negative Correlation
-0.75
1 player
J Bohannon
2 player
C Green
Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
J Bohannon
2 player
T Bruce
No Correlation
-0.11
1 player
J Bohannon
2 player
S Croft
No Correlation
1
1 player
J Bohannon
2 player
J Bohannon
Strong Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
J Bohannon
2 player
L Wood
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
J Bohannon
2 player
J Blatherwick
No Correlation
-0.35
1 player
J Bohannon
2 player
M Stanley
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.11
1 player
J Bohannon
2 player
L Wells
No Correlation
-0.23
1 player
J Bohannon
2 player
T Aspinwall
Weak Negative Correlation
0.23
1 player
J Bohannon
2 player
G Bell
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
L Wood
2 player
M Hurst
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.27
1 player
L Wood
2 player
C Green
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.25
1 player
L Wood
2 player
T Bruce
Weak Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
L Wood
2 player
S Croft
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
L Wood
2 player
J Bohannon
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
L Wood
2 player
L Wood
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.09
1 player
L Wood
2 player
J Blatherwick
No Correlation
-0.35
1 player
L Wood
2 player
M Stanley
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.19
1 player
L Wood
2 player
L Wells
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
L Wood
2 player
T Aspinwall
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
L Wood
2 player
G Bell
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
J Blatherwick
2 player
M Hurst
Weak Negative Correlation
0.25
1 player
J Blatherwick
2 player
C Green
Weak Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
J Blatherwick
2 player
T Bruce
Positive Correlation
-0.4
1 player
J Blatherwick
2 player
S Croft
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
J Blatherwick
2 player
J Bohannon
No Correlation
-0.09
1 player
J Blatherwick
2 player
L Wood
No Correlation
1
1 player
J Blatherwick
2 player
J Blatherwick
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
J Blatherwick
2 player
M Stanley
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
J Blatherwick
2 player
L Wells
Weak Negative Correlation
0.23
1 player
J Blatherwick
2 player
T Aspinwall
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
J Blatherwick
2 player
G Bell
Weak Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Stanley
2 player
M Hurst
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
M Stanley
2 player
C Green
No Correlation
-0.35
1 player
M Stanley
2 player
T Bruce
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
M Stanley
2 player
S Croft
No Correlation
-0.35
1 player
M Stanley
2 player
J Bohannon
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.35
1 player
M Stanley
2 player
L Wood
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.35
1 player
M Stanley
2 player
J Blatherwick
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
M Stanley
2 player
M Stanley
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
M Stanley
2 player
L Wells
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
M Stanley
2 player
T Aspinwall
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
M Stanley
2 player
G Bell
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
L Wells
2 player
M Hurst
No Correlation
-0.09
1 player
L Wells
2 player
C Green
No Correlation
0
1 player
L Wells
2 player
T Bruce
No Correlation
-0.08
1 player
L Wells
2 player
S Croft
No Correlation
-0.11
1 player
L Wells
2 player
J Bohannon
No Correlation
-0.19
1 player
L Wells
2 player
L Wood
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
L Wells
2 player
J Blatherwick
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.35
1 player
L Wells
2 player
M Stanley
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
L Wells
2 player
L Wells
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
L Wells
2 player
T Aspinwall
No Correlation
-0.43
1 player
L Wells
2 player
G Bell
Negative Correlation
-0.35
1 player
T Aspinwall
2 player
M Hurst
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
T Aspinwall
2 player
C Green
Weak Negative Correlation
0.23
1 player
T Aspinwall
2 player
T Bruce
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
T Aspinwall
2 player
S Croft
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
T Aspinwall
2 player
J Bohannon
Weak Negative Correlation
0.35
1 player
T Aspinwall
2 player
L Wood
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
T Aspinwall
2 player
J Blatherwick
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
T Aspinwall
2 player
M Stanley
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
T Aspinwall
2 player
L Wells
No Correlation
1
1 player
T Aspinwall
2 player
T Aspinwall
Strong Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
T Aspinwall
2 player
G Bell
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
G Bell
2 player
M Hurst
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
G Bell
2 player
C Green
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
G Bell
2 player
T Bruce
Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
G Bell
2 player
S Croft
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
G Bell
2 player
J Bohannon
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
G Bell
2 player
L Wood
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
G Bell
2 player
J Blatherwick
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
G Bell
2 player
M Stanley
Negative Correlation
-0.43
1 player
G Bell
2 player
L Wells
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
G Bell
2 player
T Aspinwall
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
G Bell
2 player
G Bell
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick M Hurst and M Stanley together
Positive Correlation

Pick T Bruce and G Bell together
Positive Correlation

Pick T Aspinwall and G Bell together
Positive Correlation

Pick M Hurst and J Bohannon together
Negative Correlation

Pick M Hurst and G Bell together
Negative Correlation

Pick C Green and J Bohannon together
Negative Correlation

Pick M Stanley and G Bell together
Negative Correlation

No data found

Best DUR Player Combinations

Best DUR Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
A Turner BAT DUR
B Dwarshuis BOW DUR
M Jones BAT DUR
O George-Robinson WK DUR
N Sowter BOW DUR
A Lees BAT DUR
B Raine BOW DUR
G Clark BAT DUR
M Potts BOW DUR
C Parkinson BOW DUR
C Ackermann AR DUR
A Turner
B Dwarshuis
M Jones
O George-Robinson
N Sowter
A Lees
B Raine
G Clark
M Potts
C Parkinson
C Ackermann
1
1 player
A Turner
2 player
A Turner
Strong Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
A Turner
2 player
B Dwarshuis
No Correlation
-0.06
1 player
A Turner
2 player
M Jones
No Correlation
-0.27
1 player
A Turner
2 player
O George-Robinson
Weak Negative Correlation
0.09
1 player
A Turner
2 player
N Sowter
No Correlation
-0.13
1 player
A Turner
2 player
A Lees
No Correlation
-0.09
1 player
A Turner
2 player
B Raine
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
A Turner
2 player
G Clark
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
A Turner
2 player
M Potts
No Correlation
0.47
1 player
A Turner
2 player
C Parkinson
Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
A Turner
2 player
C Ackermann
Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
B Dwarshuis
2 player
A Turner
No Correlation
1
1 player
B Dwarshuis
2 player
B Dwarshuis
Strong Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
B Dwarshuis
2 player
M Jones
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
B Dwarshuis
2 player
O George-Robinson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
B Dwarshuis
2 player
N Sowter
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.5
1 player
B Dwarshuis
2 player
A Lees
Negative Correlation
-0.25
1 player
B Dwarshuis
2 player
B Raine
Weak Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
B Dwarshuis
2 player
G Clark
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
B Dwarshuis
2 player
M Potts
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
B Dwarshuis
2 player
C Parkinson
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
B Dwarshuis
2 player
C Ackermann
No Correlation
-0.06
1 player
M Jones
2 player
A Turner
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
M Jones
2 player
B Dwarshuis
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M Jones
2 player
M Jones
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.05
1 player
M Jones
2 player
O George-Robinson
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
M Jones
2 player
N Sowter
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
M Jones
2 player
A Lees
No Correlation
0.24
1 player
M Jones
2 player
B Raine
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.05
1 player
M Jones
2 player
G Clark
No Correlation
0
1 player
M Jones
2 player
M Potts
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
M Jones
2 player
C Parkinson
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
M Jones
2 player
C Ackermann
No Correlation
-0.27
1 player
O George-Robinson
2 player
A Turner
Weak Negative Correlation
0.25
1 player
O George-Robinson
2 player
B Dwarshuis
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.05
1 player
O George-Robinson
2 player
M Jones
No Correlation
1
1 player
O George-Robinson
2 player
O George-Robinson
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
O George-Robinson
2 player
N Sowter
No Correlation
-0.24
1 player
O George-Robinson
2 player
A Lees
Weak Negative Correlation
0.21
1 player
O George-Robinson
2 player
B Raine
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
O George-Robinson
2 player
G Clark
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.43
1 player
O George-Robinson
2 player
M Potts
Negative Correlation
0.24
1 player
O George-Robinson
2 player
C Parkinson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
O George-Robinson
2 player
C Ackermann
Weak Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
N Sowter
2 player
A Turner
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
N Sowter
2 player
B Dwarshuis
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
N Sowter
2 player
M Jones
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
N Sowter
2 player
O George-Robinson
No Correlation
1
1 player
N Sowter
2 player
N Sowter
Strong Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
N Sowter
2 player
A Lees
No Correlation
0
1 player
N Sowter
2 player
B Raine
No Correlation
-0.17
1 player
N Sowter
2 player
G Clark
No Correlation
-0.43
1 player
N Sowter
2 player
M Potts
Negative Correlation
-0.05
1 player
N Sowter
2 player
C Parkinson
No Correlation
0.47
1 player
N Sowter
2 player
C Ackermann
Positive Correlation
-0.13
1 player
A Lees
2 player
A Turner
No Correlation
-0.5
1 player
A Lees
2 player
B Dwarshuis
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
A Lees
2 player
M Jones
No Correlation
-0.24
1 player
A Lees
2 player
O George-Robinson
Weak Negative Correlation
0.1
1 player
A Lees
2 player
N Sowter
No Correlation
1
1 player
A Lees
2 player
A Lees
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.31
1 player
A Lees
2 player
B Raine
Weak Negative Correlation
0.36
1 player
A Lees
2 player
G Clark
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.43
1 player
A Lees
2 player
M Potts
Negative Correlation
-0.09
1 player
A Lees
2 player
C Parkinson
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
A Lees
2 player
C Ackermann
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.09
1 player
B Raine
2 player
A Turner
No Correlation
-0.25
1 player
B Raine
2 player
B Dwarshuis
Weak Negative Correlation
0.24
1 player
B Raine
2 player
M Jones
Weak Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
B Raine
2 player
O George-Robinson
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
B Raine
2 player
N Sowter
No Correlation
-0.31
1 player
B Raine
2 player
A Lees
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
B Raine
2 player
B Raine
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.28
1 player
B Raine
2 player
G Clark
Weak Negative Correlation
0.71
1 player
B Raine
2 player
M Potts
Positive Correlation
-0.09
1 player
B Raine
2 player
C Parkinson
No Correlation
0.12
1 player
B Raine
2 player
C Ackermann
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
G Clark
2 player
A Turner
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
G Clark
2 player
B Dwarshuis
No Correlation
-0.05
1 player
G Clark
2 player
M Jones
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
G Clark
2 player
O George-Robinson
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.17
1 player
G Clark
2 player
N Sowter
No Correlation
0.36
1 player
G Clark
2 player
A Lees
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.28
1 player
G Clark
2 player
B Raine
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
G Clark
2 player
G Clark
Strong Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
G Clark
2 player
M Potts
Positive Correlation
-0.37
1 player
G Clark
2 player
C Parkinson
Weak Negative Correlation
0.08
1 player
G Clark
2 player
C Ackermann
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
M Potts
2 player
A Turner
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
M Potts
2 player
B Dwarshuis
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
M Potts
2 player
M Jones
No Correlation
-0.43
1 player
M Potts
2 player
O George-Robinson
Negative Correlation
-0.43
1 player
M Potts
2 player
N Sowter
Negative Correlation
-0.43
1 player
M Potts
2 player
A Lees
Negative Correlation
0.71
1 player
M Potts
2 player
B Raine
Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
M Potts
2 player
G Clark
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M Potts
2 player
M Potts
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.43
1 player
M Potts
2 player
C Parkinson
Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
M Potts
2 player
C Ackermann
Weak Negative Correlation
0.47
1 player
C Parkinson
2 player
A Turner
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
C Parkinson
2 player
B Dwarshuis
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
C Parkinson
2 player
M Jones
No Correlation
0.24
1 player
C Parkinson
2 player
O George-Robinson
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.05
1 player
C Parkinson
2 player
N Sowter
No Correlation
-0.09
1 player
C Parkinson
2 player
A Lees
No Correlation
-0.09
1 player
C Parkinson
2 player
B Raine
No Correlation
-0.37
1 player
C Parkinson
2 player
G Clark
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.43
1 player
C Parkinson
2 player
M Potts
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
C Parkinson
2 player
C Parkinson
Strong Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
C Parkinson
2 player
C Ackermann
Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
C Ackermann
2 player
A Turner
Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
C Ackermann
2 player
B Dwarshuis
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
C Ackermann
2 player
M Jones
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
C Ackermann
2 player
O George-Robinson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
C Ackermann
2 player
N Sowter
Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
C Ackermann
2 player
A Lees
Weak Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
C Ackermann
2 player
B Raine
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
C Ackermann
2 player
G Clark
No Correlation
-0.23
1 player
C Ackermann
2 player
M Potts
Weak Negative Correlation
0.5
1 player
C Ackermann
2 player
C Parkinson
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
C Ackermann
2 player
C Ackermann
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick B Raine and M Potts together
Positive Correlation

Pick B Dwarshuis and M Potts together
Negative Correlation

No data found

More on PL Labs

LAN vs DUR

PerfectLineup © 2025. All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer - PerfectLineup is an educational tool providing detailed analysis of sports players based on their past performances. We are not associated with any gaming activity and do not host any kind of paid or free contests or pool games. Our focus is purely on data-driven solutions to enhance our users' knowledge.

Perfect Lineup is not affiliated in any way to and claims no association, in any capacity whatsoever, with the Residents of the states of SIKKIM, ASSAM, ODISHA, TELANGANA, NAGALAND, ANDHRA PRADESH and where otherwise prohibited by law are not eligible to access Perfect Lineup.

This platform is applicable for users 18+ Only