ND 27 May 09:15 pm CES

Lineup Out

Headingley
Charlotte Edwards Cup

Best Player Combinations For
ND vs CES

How it Works?

This guide is super useful for identifying player combinations that are likely to score big. Use the filters to identify the best player combinations according to specific match scenarios.

Player correlate positively

Both players generally perform similarly when picked together. They either score high together or score low together. Maximise FPts by picking players that correlate positively with top players.

Player correlate negatively

Both players generally perform in an opposite manner. If one player scores high, the other usually scores low. Avoid picking players that correlate negatively with top player

Show Player Combinations on the basis of:

Best ND Player Combinations

Best ND Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad
E Marlow BAT ND
L Winfield-Hill WK ND
G Hall BOW ND
E Burns AR ND
B Heath WK ND
K Levick BOW ND
H Armitage AR ND
S Kalis BAT ND
L Dobson BAT ND
R Slater BOW ND
K Fraser AR ND
E Marlow
L Winfield-Hill
G Hall
E Burns
B Heath
K Levick
H Armitage
S Kalis
L Dobson
R Slater
K Fraser
1
1 player
E Marlow
2 player
E Marlow
Strong Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
E Marlow
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
Weak Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
E Marlow
2 player
G Hall
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.1
1 player
E Marlow
2 player
E Burns
No Correlation
0.46
1 player
E Marlow
2 player
B Heath
Positive Correlation
-0.11
1 player
E Marlow
2 player
K Levick
No Correlation
0.05
1 player
E Marlow
2 player
H Armitage
No Correlation
0.27
1 player
E Marlow
2 player
S Kalis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
E Marlow
2 player
L Dobson
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
E Marlow
2 player
R Slater
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
E Marlow
2 player
K Fraser
Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
E Marlow
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
Strong Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
G Hall
No Correlation
-0.01
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
E Burns
No Correlation
0.26
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
B Heath
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.08
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
K Levick
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
H Armitage
Weak Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
S Kalis
No Correlation
0.3
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
L Dobson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.06
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
R Slater
No Correlation
0.16
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
K Fraser
No Correlation
0.26
1 player
G Hall
2 player
E Marlow
Weak Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
G Hall
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
No Correlation
1
1 player
G Hall
2 player
G Hall
Strong Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
G Hall
2 player
E Burns
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
G Hall
2 player
B Heath
Weak Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
G Hall
2 player
K Levick
Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
G Hall
2 player
H Armitage
Weak Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
G Hall
2 player
S Kalis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
G Hall
2 player
L Dobson
No Correlation
0.36
1 player
G Hall
2 player
R Slater
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
G Hall
2 player
K Fraser
No Correlation
-0.1
1 player
E Burns
2 player
E Marlow
No Correlation
-0.01
1 player
E Burns
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
No Correlation
0.3
1 player
E Burns
2 player
G Hall
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
E Burns
2 player
E Burns
Strong Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
E Burns
2 player
B Heath
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
E Burns
2 player
K Levick
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.07
1 player
E Burns
2 player
H Armitage
No Correlation
0.09
1 player
E Burns
2 player
S Kalis
No Correlation
-0.09
1 player
E Burns
2 player
L Dobson
No Correlation
0.01
1 player
E Burns
2 player
R Slater
No Correlation
0.24
1 player
E Burns
2 player
K Fraser
Weak Positive Correlation
0.46
1 player
B Heath
2 player
E Marlow
Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
B Heath
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
B Heath
2 player
G Hall
Weak Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
B Heath
2 player
E Burns
No Correlation
1
1 player
B Heath
2 player
B Heath
Strong Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
B Heath
2 player
K Levick
Weak Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
B Heath
2 player
H Armitage
No Correlation
0.3
1 player
B Heath
2 player
S Kalis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
B Heath
2 player
L Dobson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
B Heath
2 player
R Slater
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
B Heath
2 player
K Fraser
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.11
1 player
K Levick
2 player
E Marlow
No Correlation
-0.08
1 player
K Levick
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
K Levick
2 player
G Hall
Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
K Levick
2 player
E Burns
Weak Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
K Levick
2 player
B Heath
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
K Levick
2 player
K Levick
Strong Positive Correlation
0.06
1 player
K Levick
2 player
H Armitage
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
K Levick
2 player
S Kalis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
K Levick
2 player
L Dobson
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
K Levick
2 player
R Slater
Weak Positive Correlation
0.16
1 player
K Levick
2 player
K Fraser
No Correlation
0.05
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
E Marlow
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
Weak Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
G Hall
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.07
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
E Burns
No Correlation
0.12
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
B Heath
No Correlation
0.06
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
K Levick
No Correlation
1
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
H Armitage
Strong Positive Correlation
0.03
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
S Kalis
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
L Dobson
No Correlation
0.34
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
R Slater
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.08
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
K Fraser
No Correlation
0.27
1 player
S Kalis
2 player
E Marlow
Weak Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
S Kalis
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
No Correlation
0.22
1 player
S Kalis
2 player
G Hall
Weak Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
S Kalis
2 player
E Burns
No Correlation
0.3
1 player
S Kalis
2 player
B Heath
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
S Kalis
2 player
K Levick
Weak Positive Correlation
0.03
1 player
S Kalis
2 player
H Armitage
No Correlation
1
1 player
S Kalis
2 player
S Kalis
Strong Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
S Kalis
2 player
L Dobson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
S Kalis
2 player
R Slater
Weak Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
S Kalis
2 player
K Fraser
Weak Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
L Dobson
2 player
E Marlow
Weak Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
L Dobson
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
Weak Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
L Dobson
2 player
G Hall
No Correlation
-0.09
1 player
L Dobson
2 player
E Burns
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
L Dobson
2 player
B Heath
Weak Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
L Dobson
2 player
K Levick
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
L Dobson
2 player
H Armitage
No Correlation
0.21
1 player
L Dobson
2 player
S Kalis
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
L Dobson
2 player
L Dobson
Strong Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
L Dobson
2 player
R Slater
Weak Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
L Dobson
2 player
K Fraser
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
R Slater
2 player
E Marlow
No Correlation
0.06
1 player
R Slater
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
No Correlation
0.36
1 player
R Slater
2 player
G Hall
Weak Positive Correlation
0.01
1 player
R Slater
2 player
E Burns
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
R Slater
2 player
B Heath
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
R Slater
2 player
K Levick
Weak Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
R Slater
2 player
H Armitage
Weak Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
R Slater
2 player
S Kalis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
R Slater
2 player
L Dobson
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
R Slater
2 player
R Slater
Strong Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
R Slater
2 player
K Fraser
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
K Fraser
2 player
E Marlow
Positive Correlation
0.16
1 player
K Fraser
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
No Correlation
0
1 player
K Fraser
2 player
G Hall
No Correlation
0.24
1 player
K Fraser
2 player
E Burns
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
K Fraser
2 player
B Heath
Weak Positive Correlation
0.16
1 player
K Fraser
2 player
K Levick
No Correlation
-0.08
1 player
K Fraser
2 player
H Armitage
No Correlation
0.38
1 player
K Fraser
2 player
S Kalis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
K Fraser
2 player
L Dobson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
K Fraser
2 player
R Slater
No Correlation
1
1 player
K Fraser
2 player
K Fraser
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

No data found

High Performing Players

1 K Levick

BOW
Similar Perfomance
G Hall 0.42
R Slater 0.28
B Heath 0.26
S Kalis 0.23
E Burns 0.2
K Fraser 0.16
L Dobson 0.12
H Armitage 0.06
Opposite Perfomance
E Marlow -0.11
L Winfield-Hill -0.08

2 H Armitage

AR
Similar Perfomance
R Slater 0.34
L Winfield-Hill 0.33
G Hall 0.27
L Dobson 0.14
B Heath 0.12
K Levick 0.06
E Marlow 0.05
S Kalis 0.03
Opposite Perfomance
K Fraser -0.08
E Burns -0.07

3 B Heath

WK
Similar Perfomance
E Marlow 0.46
S Kalis 0.3
L Winfield-Hill 0.26
K Levick 0.26
L Dobson 0.25
R Slater 0.25
G Hall 0.23
K Fraser 0.2
E Burns 0.12
H Armitage 0.12

4 L Winfield-Hill

WK
Similar Perfomance
H Armitage 0.33
E Marlow 0.31
L Dobson 0.3
B Heath 0.26
G Hall 0.18
K Fraser 0.16
S Kalis 0.08
R Slater 0.06
Opposite Perfomance
K Levick -0.08
E Burns -0.01

5 S Kalis

BAT
Similar Perfomance
K Fraser 0.38
B Heath 0.3
E Marlow 0.27
R Slater 0.24
K Levick 0.23
G Hall 0.22
L Dobson 0.21
E Burns 0.09
L Winfield-Hill 0.08
H Armitage 0.03

Best CES Player Combinations

Best CES Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad
C Pavely AR CES
C Webb BAT CES
K George AR CES
A Freeborn WK CES
E Jones BAT CES
C Brewer BAT CES
G Davis BOW CES
E Arlott AR CES
G Potts BOW CES
H Baker BOW CES
D Perrin BAT CES
C Pavely
C Webb
K George
A Freeborn
E Jones
C Brewer
G Davis
E Arlott
G Potts
H Baker
D Perrin
1
1 player
C Pavely
2 player
C Pavely
Strong Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
C Pavely
2 player
C Webb
Weak Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
C Pavely
2 player
K George
Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
C Pavely
2 player
A Freeborn
No Correlation
0.53
1 player
C Pavely
2 player
E Jones
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
C Pavely
2 player
C Brewer
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
C Pavely
2 player
G Davis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
C Pavely
2 player
E Arlott
Weak Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
C Pavely
2 player
G Potts
No Correlation
0.36
1 player
C Pavely
2 player
H Baker
Weak Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
C Pavely
2 player
D Perrin
Weak Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
C Webb
2 player
C Pavely
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
C Webb
2 player
C Webb
Strong Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
C Webb
2 player
K George
No Correlation
0
1 player
C Webb
2 player
A Freeborn
No Correlation
0.36
1 player
C Webb
2 player
E Jones
Weak Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
C Webb
2 player
C Brewer
Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
C Webb
2 player
G Davis
No Correlation
0.05
1 player
C Webb
2 player
E Arlott
No Correlation
0.12
1 player
C Webb
2 player
G Potts
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
C Webb
2 player
H Baker
Weak Positive Correlation
0.49
1 player
C Webb
2 player
D Perrin
Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
K George
2 player
C Pavely
Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
K George
2 player
C Webb
No Correlation
1
1 player
K George
2 player
K George
Strong Positive Correlation
0.06
1 player
K George
2 player
A Freeborn
No Correlation
0.43
1 player
K George
2 player
E Jones
Positive Correlation
-0.22
1 player
K George
2 player
C Brewer
Weak Negative Correlation
0.34
1 player
K George
2 player
G Davis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
K George
2 player
E Arlott
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
K George
2 player
G Potts
Weak Positive Correlation
0.19
1 player
K George
2 player
H Baker
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
K George
2 player
D Perrin
Weak Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
A Freeborn
2 player
C Pavely
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Freeborn
2 player
C Webb
No Correlation
0.06
1 player
A Freeborn
2 player
K George
No Correlation
1
1 player
A Freeborn
2 player
A Freeborn
Strong Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
A Freeborn
2 player
E Jones
Weak Positive Correlation
0.54
1 player
A Freeborn
2 player
C Brewer
Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
A Freeborn
2 player
G Davis
No Correlation
-0.06
1 player
A Freeborn
2 player
E Arlott
No Correlation
0.24
1 player
A Freeborn
2 player
G Potts
Weak Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
A Freeborn
2 player
H Baker
No Correlation
0.27
1 player
A Freeborn
2 player
D Perrin
Weak Positive Correlation
0.53
1 player
E Jones
2 player
C Pavely
Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
E Jones
2 player
C Webb
Weak Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
E Jones
2 player
K George
Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
E Jones
2 player
A Freeborn
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
E Jones
2 player
E Jones
Strong Positive Correlation
0.16
1 player
E Jones
2 player
C Brewer
No Correlation
0.48
1 player
E Jones
2 player
G Davis
Positive Correlation
0.29
1 player
E Jones
2 player
E Arlott
Weak Positive Correlation
0.44
1 player
E Jones
2 player
G Potts
Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
E Jones
2 player
H Baker
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
E Jones
2 player
D Perrin
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
C Brewer
2 player
C Pavely
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
C Brewer
2 player
C Webb
Positive Correlation
-0.22
1 player
C Brewer
2 player
K George
Weak Negative Correlation
0.54
1 player
C Brewer
2 player
A Freeborn
Positive Correlation
0.16
1 player
C Brewer
2 player
E Jones
No Correlation
1
1 player
C Brewer
2 player
C Brewer
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.16
1 player
C Brewer
2 player
G Davis
No Correlation
-0.6
1 player
C Brewer
2 player
E Arlott
Negative Correlation
0.42
1 player
C Brewer
2 player
G Potts
Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
C Brewer
2 player
H Baker
No Correlation
0.56
1 player
C Brewer
2 player
D Perrin
Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
G Davis
2 player
C Pavely
Weak Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
G Davis
2 player
C Webb
No Correlation
0.34
1 player
G Davis
2 player
K George
Weak Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
G Davis
2 player
A Freeborn
No Correlation
0.48
1 player
G Davis
2 player
E Jones
Positive Correlation
-0.16
1 player
G Davis
2 player
C Brewer
No Correlation
1
1 player
G Davis
2 player
G Davis
Strong Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
G Davis
2 player
E Arlott
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
G Davis
2 player
G Potts
Weak Positive Correlation
0.19
1 player
G Davis
2 player
H Baker
No Correlation
0.1
1 player
G Davis
2 player
D Perrin
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
E Arlott
2 player
C Pavely
Weak Positive Correlation
0.05
1 player
E Arlott
2 player
C Webb
No Correlation
0.24
1 player
E Arlott
2 player
K George
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.06
1 player
E Arlott
2 player
A Freeborn
No Correlation
0.29
1 player
E Arlott
2 player
E Jones
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.6
1 player
E Arlott
2 player
C Brewer
Negative Correlation
0.18
1 player
E Arlott
2 player
G Davis
No Correlation
1
1 player
E Arlott
2 player
E Arlott
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.04
1 player
E Arlott
2 player
G Potts
No Correlation
0.22
1 player
E Arlott
2 player
H Baker
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.21
1 player
E Arlott
2 player
D Perrin
Weak Negative Correlation
0.1
1 player
G Potts
2 player
C Pavely
No Correlation
0.12
1 player
G Potts
2 player
C Webb
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
G Potts
2 player
K George
Weak Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
G Potts
2 player
A Freeborn
Weak Positive Correlation
0.44
1 player
G Potts
2 player
E Jones
Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
G Potts
2 player
C Brewer
Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
G Potts
2 player
G Davis
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.04
1 player
G Potts
2 player
E Arlott
No Correlation
1
1 player
G Potts
2 player
G Potts
Strong Positive Correlation
0.03
1 player
G Potts
2 player
H Baker
No Correlation
0.38
1 player
G Potts
2 player
D Perrin
Weak Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
H Baker
2 player
C Pavely
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
H Baker
2 player
C Webb
Weak Positive Correlation
0.19
1 player
H Baker
2 player
K George
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
H Baker
2 player
A Freeborn
No Correlation
0.17
1 player
H Baker
2 player
E Jones
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
H Baker
2 player
C Brewer
No Correlation
0.19
1 player
H Baker
2 player
G Davis
No Correlation
0.22
1 player
H Baker
2 player
E Arlott
Weak Positive Correlation
0.03
1 player
H Baker
2 player
G Potts
No Correlation
1
1 player
H Baker
2 player
H Baker
Strong Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
H Baker
2 player
D Perrin
Weak Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
D Perrin
2 player
C Pavely
Weak Positive Correlation
0.49
1 player
D Perrin
2 player
C Webb
Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
D Perrin
2 player
K George
Weak Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
D Perrin
2 player
A Freeborn
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
D Perrin
2 player
E Jones
Weak Positive Correlation
0.56
1 player
D Perrin
2 player
C Brewer
Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
D Perrin
2 player
G Davis
No Correlation
-0.21
1 player
D Perrin
2 player
E Arlott
Weak Negative Correlation
0.38
1 player
D Perrin
2 player
G Potts
Weak Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
D Perrin
2 player
H Baker
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
D Perrin
2 player
D Perrin
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

No data found

Don’t pick C Brewer and E Arlott in the same lineup
Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 E Arlott

AR
Similar Perfomance
E Jones 0.29
K George 0.24
C Pavely 0.23
H Baker 0.22
G Davis 0.18
C Webb 0.05
Opposite Perfomance
C Brewer -0.6
D Perrin -0.21
A Freeborn -0.06
G Potts -0.04

2 E Jones

BAT
Similar Perfomance
C Pavely 0.53
G Davis 0.48
G Potts 0.44
K George 0.43
C Webb 0.36
E Arlott 0.29
A Freeborn 0.27
D Perrin 0.25
H Baker 0.17
C Brewer 0.16

3 G Potts

BOW
Similar Perfomance
E Jones 0.44
C Brewer 0.42
D Perrin 0.38
G Davis 0.28
A Freeborn 0.24
K George 0.2
C Webb 0.12
C Pavely 0.1
H Baker 0.03
Opposite Perfomance
E Arlott -0.04

4 G Davis

BOW
Similar Perfomance
E Jones 0.48
K George 0.34
G Potts 0.28
C Pavely 0.23
H Baker 0.19
E Arlott 0.18
D Perrin 0.1
C Webb 0.09
A Freeborn 0.08
Opposite Perfomance
C Brewer -0.16

5 K George

AR
Similar Perfomance
E Jones 0.43
C Pavely 0.4
G Davis 0.34
E Arlott 0.24
D Perrin 0.23
G Potts 0.2
H Baker 0.19
C Webb 0.13
A Freeborn 0.06
Opposite Perfomance
C Brewer -0.22

Best ND Player Combinations

Best ND Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad
E Marlow BAT ND
L Winfield-Hill WK ND
G Hall BOW ND
E Burns AR ND
B Heath WK ND
K Levick BOW ND
H Armitage AR ND
S Kalis BAT ND
L Dobson BAT ND
R Slater BOW ND
K Fraser AR ND
E Marlow
L Winfield-Hill
G Hall
E Burns
B Heath
K Levick
H Armitage
S Kalis
L Dobson
R Slater
K Fraser
1
1 player
E Marlow
2 player
E Marlow
Strong Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
E Marlow
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
No Correlation
-0.42
1 player
E Marlow
2 player
G Hall
Negative Correlation
-0.5
1 player
E Marlow
2 player
E Burns
Negative Correlation
0.08
1 player
E Marlow
2 player
B Heath
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
E Marlow
2 player
K Levick
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.2
1 player
E Marlow
2 player
H Armitage
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
E Marlow
2 player
S Kalis
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
E Marlow
2 player
L Dobson
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
E Marlow
2 player
R Slater
Weak Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
E Marlow
2 player
K Fraser
Weak Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
E Marlow
No Correlation
1
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
G Hall
No Correlation
-0.43
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
E Burns
Negative Correlation
-0.12
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
B Heath
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
K Levick
Weak Negative Correlation
0.44
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
H Armitage
Positive Correlation
-0.5
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
S Kalis
Negative Correlation
0.12
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
L Dobson
No Correlation
-0.09
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
R Slater
No Correlation
-0.08
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
K Fraser
No Correlation
-0.42
1 player
G Hall
2 player
E Marlow
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
G Hall
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
No Correlation
1
1 player
G Hall
2 player
G Hall
Strong Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
G Hall
2 player
E Burns
Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
G Hall
2 player
B Heath
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
G Hall
2 player
K Levick
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
G Hall
2 player
H Armitage
No Correlation
-0.17
1 player
G Hall
2 player
S Kalis
No Correlation
-0.17
1 player
G Hall
2 player
L Dobson
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
G Hall
2 player
R Slater
No Correlation
-0.45
1 player
G Hall
2 player
K Fraser
Negative Correlation
-0.5
1 player
E Burns
2 player
E Marlow
Negative Correlation
-0.43
1 player
E Burns
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
Negative Correlation
0.42
1 player
E Burns
2 player
G Hall
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
E Burns
2 player
E Burns
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.11
1 player
E Burns
2 player
B Heath
No Correlation
-0.11
1 player
E Burns
2 player
K Levick
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
E Burns
2 player
H Armitage
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
E Burns
2 player
S Kalis
No Correlation
-0.56
1 player
E Burns
2 player
L Dobson
Negative Correlation
-0.25
1 player
E Burns
2 player
R Slater
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.11
1 player
E Burns
2 player
K Fraser
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
B Heath
2 player
E Marlow
No Correlation
-0.12
1 player
B Heath
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
No Correlation
0.09
1 player
B Heath
2 player
G Hall
No Correlation
-0.11
1 player
B Heath
2 player
E Burns
No Correlation
1
1 player
B Heath
2 player
B Heath
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.08
1 player
B Heath
2 player
K Levick
No Correlation
-0.17
1 player
B Heath
2 player
H Armitage
No Correlation
0.13
1 player
B Heath
2 player
S Kalis
No Correlation
-0.18
1 player
B Heath
2 player
L Dobson
No Correlation
-0.29
1 player
B Heath
2 player
R Slater
Weak Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
B Heath
2 player
K Fraser
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
K Levick
2 player
E Marlow
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
K Levick
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
Weak Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
K Levick
2 player
G Hall
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.11
1 player
K Levick
2 player
E Burns
No Correlation
-0.08
1 player
K Levick
2 player
B Heath
No Correlation
1
1 player
K Levick
2 player
K Levick
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.21
1 player
K Levick
2 player
H Armitage
Weak Negative Correlation
0.08
1 player
K Levick
2 player
S Kalis
No Correlation
-0.04
1 player
K Levick
2 player
L Dobson
No Correlation
-0.12
1 player
K Levick
2 player
R Slater
No Correlation
-0.2
1 player
K Levick
2 player
K Fraser
No Correlation
-0.2
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
E Marlow
No Correlation
0.44
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
G Hall
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
E Burns
No Correlation
-0.17
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
B Heath
No Correlation
-0.21
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
K Levick
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
H Armitage
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.46
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
S Kalis
Negative Correlation
-0.12
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
L Dobson
No Correlation
0.12
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
R Slater
No Correlation
-0.2
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
K Fraser
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
S Kalis
2 player
E Marlow
No Correlation
-0.5
1 player
S Kalis
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
Negative Correlation
-0.17
1 player
S Kalis
2 player
G Hall
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
S Kalis
2 player
E Burns
No Correlation
0.13
1 player
S Kalis
2 player
B Heath
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
S Kalis
2 player
K Levick
No Correlation
-0.46
1 player
S Kalis
2 player
H Armitage
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
S Kalis
2 player
S Kalis
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.28
1 player
S Kalis
2 player
L Dobson
Weak Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
S Kalis
2 player
R Slater
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
S Kalis
2 player
K Fraser
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
L Dobson
2 player
E Marlow
Weak Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
L Dobson
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
No Correlation
-0.17
1 player
L Dobson
2 player
G Hall
No Correlation
-0.56
1 player
L Dobson
2 player
E Burns
Negative Correlation
-0.18
1 player
L Dobson
2 player
B Heath
No Correlation
-0.04
1 player
L Dobson
2 player
K Levick
No Correlation
-0.12
1 player
L Dobson
2 player
H Armitage
No Correlation
-0.28
1 player
L Dobson
2 player
S Kalis
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
L Dobson
2 player
L Dobson
Strong Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
L Dobson
2 player
R Slater
No Correlation
0.07
1 player
L Dobson
2 player
K Fraser
No Correlation
-0.23
1 player
R Slater
2 player
E Marlow
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.09
1 player
R Slater
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
R Slater
2 player
G Hall
No Correlation
-0.25
1 player
R Slater
2 player
E Burns
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.29
1 player
R Slater
2 player
B Heath
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.12
1 player
R Slater
2 player
K Levick
No Correlation
0.12
1 player
R Slater
2 player
H Armitage
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
R Slater
2 player
S Kalis
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
R Slater
2 player
L Dobson
No Correlation
1
1 player
R Slater
2 player
R Slater
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.56
1 player
R Slater
2 player
K Fraser
Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
K Fraser
2 player
E Marlow
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.08
1 player
K Fraser
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
No Correlation
-0.45
1 player
K Fraser
2 player
G Hall
Negative Correlation
-0.11
1 player
K Fraser
2 player
E Burns
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
K Fraser
2 player
B Heath
No Correlation
-0.2
1 player
K Fraser
2 player
K Levick
No Correlation
-0.2
1 player
K Fraser
2 player
H Armitage
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
K Fraser
2 player
S Kalis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
K Fraser
2 player
L Dobson
No Correlation
-0.56
1 player
K Fraser
2 player
R Slater
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
K Fraser
2 player
K Fraser
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

No data found

High Performing Players

1 K Levick

BOW
Similar Perfomance
G Hall 0.33
S Kalis 0.08
Opposite Perfomance
E Marlow -0.33
L Winfield-Hill -0.33
H Armitage -0.21
K Fraser -0.2
R Slater -0.12
E Burns -0.11
B Heath -0.08
L Dobson -0.04

2 H Armitage

AR
Similar Perfomance
L Winfield-Hill 0.44
R Slater 0.12
E Burns 0.11
Opposite Perfomance
S Kalis -0.46
K Levick -0.21
E Marlow -0.2
K Fraser -0.2
B Heath -0.17
L Dobson -0.12

3 B Heath

WK
Similar Perfomance
K Fraser 0.14
S Kalis 0.13
G Hall 0.09
E Marlow 0.08
Opposite Perfomance
R Slater -0.29
L Dobson -0.18
H Armitage -0.17
L Winfield-Hill -0.12
E Burns -0.11
K Levick -0.08

4 S Kalis

BAT
Similar Perfomance
K Fraser 0.2
R Slater 0.14
B Heath 0.13
E Burns 0.11
E Marlow 0.08
K Levick 0.08
Opposite Perfomance
L Winfield-Hill -0.5
H Armitage -0.46
L Dobson -0.28
G Hall -0.17

5 L Winfield-Hill

WK
Similar Perfomance
H Armitage 0.44
L Dobson 0.12
E Marlow 0.11
Opposite Perfomance
S Kalis -0.5
E Burns -0.43
K Levick -0.33
B Heath -0.12
R Slater -0.09
K Fraser -0.08

Best CES Player Combinations

Best CES Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

No data found

No data found

High Performing Players

PerfectLineup © 2024. All Rights Reserved