Upcoming
Fixtures
View All
ND 19 Jun 04:00 pm THN

Lineup Out

Riverside Ground, Chester-le-Street
Charlotte Edwards Cup

Best Player Combinations For
ND vs THN

How it Works?

This guide is super useful for identifying player combinations that are likely to score big. Use the filters to identify the best player combinations according to specific match scenarios.

Player correlate positively

Both players generally perform similarly when picked together. They either score high together or score low together. Maximise FPts by picking players that correlate positively with top players.

Player correlate negatively

Both players generally perform in an opposite manner. If one player scores high, the other usually scores low. Avoid picking players that correlate negatively with top player

More on PL Labs

ND vs THN

Show Player Combinations on the basis of:

Best ND Player Combinations

Best ND Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
E Marlow BAT ND
L Scott BOW ND
E Burns AR ND
B Heath WK ND
K Levick BOW ND
H Armitage AR ND
S Kalis BAT ND
R Slater BOW ND
R Duckworth BAT ND
S Turner BOW ND
K Fraser AR ND
E Marlow
L Scott
E Burns
B Heath
K Levick
H Armitage
S Kalis
R Slater
R Duckworth
S Turner
K Fraser
1
1 player
E Marlow
2 player
E Marlow
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.4
1 player
E Marlow
2 player
L Scott
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.13
1 player
E Marlow
2 player
E Burns
No Correlation
0.46
1 player
E Marlow
2 player
B Heath
Positive Correlation
-0.11
1 player
E Marlow
2 player
K Levick
No Correlation
0.04
1 player
E Marlow
2 player
H Armitage
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
E Marlow
2 player
S Kalis
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.05
1 player
E Marlow
2 player
R Slater
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
E Marlow
2 player
R Duckworth
Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
E Marlow
2 player
S Turner
Weak Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
E Marlow
2 player
K Fraser
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.4
1 player
L Scott
2 player
E Marlow
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
L Scott
2 player
L Scott
Strong Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
L Scott
2 player
E Burns
Positive Correlation
0.49
1 player
L Scott
2 player
B Heath
Positive Correlation
0.48
1 player
L Scott
2 player
K Levick
Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
L Scott
2 player
H Armitage
Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
L Scott
2 player
S Kalis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
L Scott
2 player
R Slater
Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
L Scott
2 player
R Duckworth
Positive Correlation
-0.4
1 player
L Scott
2 player
S Turner
Weak Negative Correlation
0.02
1 player
L Scott
2 player
K Fraser
No Correlation
-0.13
1 player
E Burns
2 player
E Marlow
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
E Burns
2 player
L Scott
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
E Burns
2 player
E Burns
Strong Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
E Burns
2 player
B Heath
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
E Burns
2 player
K Levick
Weak Positive Correlation
0.01
1 player
E Burns
2 player
H Armitage
No Correlation
0.12
1 player
E Burns
2 player
S Kalis
No Correlation
0.09
1 player
E Burns
2 player
R Slater
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
E Burns
2 player
R Duckworth
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.22
1 player
E Burns
2 player
S Turner
Weak Negative Correlation
0.32
1 player
E Burns
2 player
K Fraser
Weak Positive Correlation
0.46
1 player
B Heath
2 player
E Marlow
Positive Correlation
0.49
1 player
B Heath
2 player
L Scott
Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
B Heath
2 player
E Burns
No Correlation
1
1 player
B Heath
2 player
B Heath
Strong Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
B Heath
2 player
K Levick
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
B Heath
2 player
H Armitage
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
B Heath
2 player
S Kalis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
B Heath
2 player
R Slater
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
B Heath
2 player
R Duckworth
Weak Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
B Heath
2 player
S Turner
Weak Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
B Heath
2 player
K Fraser
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.11
1 player
K Levick
2 player
E Marlow
No Correlation
0.48
1 player
K Levick
2 player
L Scott
Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
K Levick
2 player
E Burns
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
K Levick
2 player
B Heath
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
K Levick
2 player
K Levick
Strong Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
K Levick
2 player
H Armitage
No Correlation
0.24
1 player
K Levick
2 player
S Kalis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
K Levick
2 player
R Slater
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
K Levick
2 player
R Duckworth
Weak Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
K Levick
2 player
S Turner
Positive Correlation
0.19
1 player
K Levick
2 player
K Fraser
No Correlation
0.04
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
E Marlow
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
L Scott
Positive Correlation
0.01
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
E Burns
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
B Heath
No Correlation
0.1
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
K Levick
No Correlation
1
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
H Armitage
Strong Positive Correlation
0.06
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
S Kalis
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
R Slater
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
R Duckworth
Weak Negative Correlation
0.2
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
S Turner
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.04
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
K Fraser
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
S Kalis
2 player
E Marlow
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
S Kalis
2 player
L Scott
Weak Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
S Kalis
2 player
E Burns
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
S Kalis
2 player
B Heath
Weak Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
S Kalis
2 player
K Levick
Weak Positive Correlation
0.06
1 player
S Kalis
2 player
H Armitage
No Correlation
1
1 player
S Kalis
2 player
S Kalis
Strong Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
S Kalis
2 player
R Slater
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
S Kalis
2 player
R Duckworth
Weak Positive Correlation
0.44
1 player
S Kalis
2 player
S Turner
Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
S Kalis
2 player
K Fraser
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.05
1 player
R Slater
2 player
E Marlow
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
R Slater
2 player
L Scott
Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
R Slater
2 player
E Burns
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
R Slater
2 player
B Heath
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
R Slater
2 player
K Levick
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
R Slater
2 player
H Armitage
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
R Slater
2 player
S Kalis
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
R Slater
2 player
R Slater
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.47
1 player
R Slater
2 player
R Duckworth
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
R Slater
2 player
S Turner
No Correlation
0.17
1 player
R Slater
2 player
K Fraser
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
R Duckworth
2 player
E Marlow
Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
R Duckworth
2 player
L Scott
Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
R Duckworth
2 player
E Burns
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
R Duckworth
2 player
B Heath
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
R Duckworth
2 player
K Levick
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
R Duckworth
2 player
H Armitage
Weak Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
R Duckworth
2 player
S Kalis
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.47
1 player
R Duckworth
2 player
R Slater
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
R Duckworth
2 player
R Duckworth
Strong Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
R Duckworth
2 player
S Turner
Weak Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
R Duckworth
2 player
K Fraser
Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
S Turner
2 player
E Marlow
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.4
1 player
S Turner
2 player
L Scott
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.22
1 player
S Turner
2 player
E Burns
Weak Negative Correlation
0.22
1 player
S Turner
2 player
B Heath
Weak Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
S Turner
2 player
K Levick
Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
S Turner
2 player
H Armitage
Weak Positive Correlation
0.44
1 player
S Turner
2 player
S Kalis
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
S Turner
2 player
R Slater
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
S Turner
2 player
R Duckworth
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
S Turner
2 player
S Turner
Strong Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
S Turner
2 player
K Fraser
Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
K Fraser
2 player
E Marlow
Weak Positive Correlation
0.02
1 player
K Fraser
2 player
L Scott
No Correlation
0.32
1 player
K Fraser
2 player
E Burns
Weak Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
K Fraser
2 player
B Heath
Weak Positive Correlation
0.19
1 player
K Fraser
2 player
K Levick
No Correlation
-0.04
1 player
K Fraser
2 player
H Armitage
No Correlation
0.38
1 player
K Fraser
2 player
S Kalis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
K Fraser
2 player
R Slater
No Correlation
0.47
1 player
K Fraser
2 player
R Duckworth
Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
K Fraser
2 player
S Turner
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
K Fraser
2 player
K Fraser
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick L Scott and E Burns together
Positive Correlation

Pick L Scott and R Slater together
Positive Correlation

High Performing Players

1 K Levick

BOW
Similar Perfomance
L Scott 0.48
S Turner 0.4
R Duckworth 0.33
B Heath 0.28
R Slater 0.28
E Burns 0.25
S Kalis 0.24
K Fraser 0.19
H Armitage 0.1
Opposite Perfomance
E Marlow -0.11

2 H Armitage

AR
Similar Perfomance
L Scott 0.5
R Slater 0.35
S Turner 0.2
B Heath 0.14
K Levick 0.1
S Kalis 0.06
E Marlow 0.04
E Burns 0.01
Opposite Perfomance
R Duckworth -0.23
K Fraser -0.04

3 B Heath

WK
Similar Perfomance
L Scott 0.49
E Marlow 0.46
S Kalis 0.33
K Levick 0.28
R Slater 0.23
S Turner 0.22
K Fraser 0.21
R Duckworth 0.2
E Burns 0.15
H Armitage 0.14

4 E Burns

AR
Similar Perfomance
L Scott 0.7
K Fraser 0.32
K Levick 0.25
R Duckworth 0.23
B Heath 0.15
S Kalis 0.12
R Slater 0.09
H Armitage 0.01
Opposite Perfomance
S Turner -0.22
E Marlow -0.13

5 S Kalis

BAT
Similar Perfomance
S Turner 0.44
K Fraser 0.38
B Heath 0.33
R Duckworth 0.33
E Marlow 0.28
L Scott 0.28
K Levick 0.24
R Slater 0.23
E Burns 0.12
H Armitage 0.06

Best THN Player Combinations

Best THN Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
K Cross BOW THDER
S Morris BOW THDER
G Johnson AR THDER
K Mack BAT THDER
T Norris BOW THDER
E Threlkeld WK THDER
E Lamb BAT THDER
F Morris AR THDER
P Graham BOW THDER
L Heap BAT THDER
S Smale WK THDER
K Cross
S Morris
G Johnson
K Mack
T Norris
E Threlkeld
E Lamb
F Morris
P Graham
L Heap
S Smale
1
1 player
K Cross
2 player
K Cross
Strong Positive Correlation
0.8
1 player
K Cross
2 player
S Morris
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.4
1 player
K Cross
2 player
G Johnson
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.05
1 player
K Cross
2 player
K Mack
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
K Cross
2 player
T Norris
Weak Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
K Cross
2 player
E Threlkeld
Weak Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
K Cross
2 player
E Lamb
Weak Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
K Cross
2 player
F Morris
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.18
1 player
K Cross
2 player
P Graham
No Correlation
0.05
1 player
K Cross
2 player
L Heap
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
K Cross
2 player
S Smale
Weak Positive Correlation
0.8
1 player
S Morris
2 player
K Cross
Strong Positive Correlation
1
1 player
S Morris
2 player
S Morris
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.4
1 player
S Morris
2 player
G Johnson
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.5
1 player
S Morris
2 player
K Mack
Negative Correlation
0.12
1 player
S Morris
2 player
T Norris
No Correlation
0.54
1 player
S Morris
2 player
E Threlkeld
Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
S Morris
2 player
E Lamb
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
S Morris
2 player
F Morris
No Correlation
-0.25
1 player
S Morris
2 player
P Graham
Weak Negative Correlation
0.13
1 player
S Morris
2 player
L Heap
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
S Morris
2 player
S Smale
No Correlation
-0.4
1 player
G Johnson
2 player
K Cross
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.4
1 player
G Johnson
2 player
S Morris
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
G Johnson
2 player
G Johnson
Strong Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
G Johnson
2 player
K Mack
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
G Johnson
2 player
T Norris
Strong Positive Correlation
1
1 player
G Johnson
2 player
E Threlkeld
Strong Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
G Johnson
2 player
E Lamb
Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
G Johnson
2 player
F Morris
Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
G Johnson
2 player
P Graham
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
G Johnson
2 player
L Heap
Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
G Johnson
2 player
S Smale
Positive Correlation
-0.05
1 player
K Mack
2 player
K Cross
No Correlation
-0.5
1 player
K Mack
2 player
S Morris
Negative Correlation
0.4
1 player
K Mack
2 player
G Johnson
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
K Mack
2 player
K Mack
Strong Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
K Mack
2 player
T Norris
Weak Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
K Mack
2 player
E Threlkeld
Weak Positive Correlation
0.62
1 player
K Mack
2 player
E Lamb
Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
K Mack
2 player
F Morris
Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
K Mack
2 player
P Graham
Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
K Mack
2 player
L Heap
Weak Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
K Mack
2 player
S Smale
Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
T Norris
2 player
K Cross
Weak Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
T Norris
2 player
S Morris
No Correlation
1
1 player
T Norris
2 player
G Johnson
Strong Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
T Norris
2 player
K Mack
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
T Norris
2 player
T Norris
Strong Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
T Norris
2 player
E Threlkeld
Weak Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
T Norris
2 player
E Lamb
Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
T Norris
2 player
F Morris
Weak Positive Correlation
0.56
1 player
T Norris
2 player
P Graham
Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
T Norris
2 player
L Heap
Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
T Norris
2 player
S Smale
No Correlation
0.27
1 player
E Threlkeld
2 player
K Cross
Weak Positive Correlation
0.54
1 player
E Threlkeld
2 player
S Morris
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
E Threlkeld
2 player
G Johnson
Strong Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
E Threlkeld
2 player
K Mack
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
E Threlkeld
2 player
T Norris
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
E Threlkeld
2 player
E Threlkeld
Strong Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
E Threlkeld
2 player
E Lamb
No Correlation
0.1
1 player
E Threlkeld
2 player
F Morris
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
E Threlkeld
2 player
P Graham
No Correlation
0.38
1 player
E Threlkeld
2 player
L Heap
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
E Threlkeld
2 player
S Smale
Weak Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
E Lamb
2 player
K Cross
Weak Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
E Lamb
2 player
S Morris
Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
E Lamb
2 player
G Johnson
Positive Correlation
0.62
1 player
E Lamb
2 player
K Mack
Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
E Lamb
2 player
T Norris
Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
E Lamb
2 player
E Threlkeld
No Correlation
1
1 player
E Lamb
2 player
E Lamb
Strong Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
E Lamb
2 player
F Morris
Weak Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
E Lamb
2 player
P Graham
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
E Lamb
2 player
L Heap
Weak Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
E Lamb
2 player
S Smale
Weak Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
F Morris
2 player
K Cross
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
F Morris
2 player
S Morris
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
F Morris
2 player
G Johnson
Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
F Morris
2 player
K Mack
Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
F Morris
2 player
T Norris
Weak Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
F Morris
2 player
E Threlkeld
No Correlation
0.24
1 player
F Morris
2 player
E Lamb
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
F Morris
2 player
F Morris
Strong Positive Correlation
0.19
1 player
F Morris
2 player
P Graham
No Correlation
-0.08
1 player
F Morris
2 player
L Heap
No Correlation
-0.02
1 player
F Morris
2 player
S Smale
No Correlation
-0.18
1 player
P Graham
2 player
K Cross
No Correlation
-0.25
1 player
P Graham
2 player
S Morris
Weak Negative Correlation
0.4
1 player
P Graham
2 player
G Johnson
Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
P Graham
2 player
K Mack
Positive Correlation
0.56
1 player
P Graham
2 player
T Norris
Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
P Graham
2 player
E Threlkeld
No Correlation
0.3
1 player
P Graham
2 player
E Lamb
Weak Positive Correlation
0.19
1 player
P Graham
2 player
F Morris
No Correlation
1
1 player
P Graham
2 player
P Graham
Strong Positive Correlation
0.48
1 player
P Graham
2 player
L Heap
Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
P Graham
2 player
S Smale
No Correlation
0.05
1 player
L Heap
2 player
K Cross
No Correlation
0.13
1 player
L Heap
2 player
S Morris
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
L Heap
2 player
G Johnson
Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
L Heap
2 player
K Mack
Weak Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
L Heap
2 player
T Norris
Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
L Heap
2 player
E Threlkeld
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
L Heap
2 player
E Lamb
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.08
1 player
L Heap
2 player
F Morris
No Correlation
0.48
1 player
L Heap
2 player
P Graham
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
L Heap
2 player
L Heap
Strong Positive Correlation
0.04
1 player
L Heap
2 player
S Smale
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
S Smale
2 player
K Cross
Weak Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
S Smale
2 player
S Morris
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
S Smale
2 player
G Johnson
Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
S Smale
2 player
K Mack
Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
S Smale
2 player
T Norris
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
S Smale
2 player
E Threlkeld
Weak Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
S Smale
2 player
E Lamb
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.02
1 player
S Smale
2 player
F Morris
No Correlation
0.09
1 player
S Smale
2 player
P Graham
No Correlation
0.04
1 player
S Smale
2 player
L Heap
No Correlation
1
1 player
S Smale
2 player
S Smale
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick K Cross and S Morris together
Strong Positive Correlation

Pick G Johnson and T Norris together
Strong Positive Correlation

Pick G Johnson and E Threlkeld together
Strong Positive Correlation

Pick G Johnson and L Heap together
Positive Correlation

Pick K Mack and E Lamb together
Positive Correlation

High Performing Players

1 E Lamb

BAT
Similar Perfomance
K Mack 0.62
S Morris 0.43
T Norris 0.43
G Johnson 0.4
S Smale 0.39
P Graham 0.3
K Cross 0.26
L Heap 0.25
F Morris 0.24
E Threlkeld 0.09

2 F Morris

AR
Similar Perfomance
K Mack 0.42
G Johnson 0.4
K Cross 0.38
T Norris 0.24
E Lamb 0.24
P Graham 0.19
E Threlkeld 0.1
Opposite Perfomance
L Heap -0.08
S Smale -0.02

3 K Cross

BOW
Similar Perfomance
S Morris 0.8
F Morris 0.38
T Norris 0.28
E Threlkeld 0.27
E Lamb 0.26
S Smale 0.23
L Heap 0.05
Opposite Perfomance
G Johnson -0.4
P Graham -0.18
K Mack -0.05

4 E Threlkeld

WK
Similar Perfomance
G Johnson 1
S Morris 0.54
K Mack 0.38
L Heap 0.38
K Cross 0.27
S Smale 0.23
T Norris 0.2
P Graham 0.14
F Morris 0.1
E Lamb 0.09

5 T Norris

BOW
Similar Perfomance
G Johnson 1
P Graham 0.56
E Lamb 0.43
L Heap 0.43
K Mack 0.35
K Cross 0.28
F Morris 0.24
E Threlkeld 0.2
S Smale 0.13
S Morris 0.12

Best ND Player Combinations

Best ND Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
E Marlow BAT ND
L Scott BOW ND
E Burns AR ND
B Heath WK ND
K Levick BOW ND
H Armitage AR ND
S Kalis BAT ND
R Slater BOW ND
R Duckworth BAT ND
S Turner BOW ND
K Fraser AR ND
E Marlow
L Scott
E Burns
B Heath
K Levick
H Armitage
S Kalis
R Slater
R Duckworth
S Turner
K Fraser
1
1 player
E Marlow
2 player
E Marlow
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
E Marlow
2 player
L Scott
Negative Correlation
-0.56
1 player
E Marlow
2 player
E Burns
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
E Marlow
2 player
B Heath
No Correlation
-0.38
1 player
E Marlow
2 player
K Levick
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.25
1 player
E Marlow
2 player
H Armitage
Weak Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
E Marlow
2 player
S Kalis
No Correlation
-0.29
1 player
E Marlow
2 player
R Slater
Weak Negative Correlation
0.23
1 player
E Marlow
2 player
R Duckworth
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
E Marlow
2 player
S Turner
Weak Negative Correlation
0.2
1 player
E Marlow
2 player
K Fraser
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
L Scott
2 player
E Marlow
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
L Scott
2 player
L Scott
Strong Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
L Scott
2 player
E Burns
Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
L Scott
2 player
B Heath
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
L Scott
2 player
K Levick
Weak Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
L Scott
2 player
H Armitage
Positive Correlation
-0.75
1 player
L Scott
2 player
S Kalis
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
L Scott
2 player
R Slater
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
L Scott
2 player
R Duckworth
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
L Scott
2 player
S Turner
Negative Correlation
-0.43
1 player
L Scott
2 player
K Fraser
Negative Correlation
-0.56
1 player
E Burns
2 player
E Marlow
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
E Burns
2 player
L Scott
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
E Burns
2 player
E Burns
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
E Burns
2 player
B Heath
No Correlation
0
1 player
E Burns
2 player
K Levick
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
E Burns
2 player
H Armitage
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
E Burns
2 player
S Kalis
No Correlation
-0.11
1 player
E Burns
2 player
R Slater
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
E Burns
2 player
R Duckworth
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
E Burns
2 player
S Turner
No Correlation
0
1 player
E Burns
2 player
K Fraser
No Correlation
0
1 player
B Heath
2 player
E Marlow
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
B Heath
2 player
L Scott
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
B Heath
2 player
E Burns
No Correlation
1
1 player
B Heath
2 player
B Heath
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.04
1 player
B Heath
2 player
K Levick
No Correlation
-0.12
1 player
B Heath
2 player
H Armitage
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
B Heath
2 player
S Kalis
No Correlation
-0.2
1 player
B Heath
2 player
R Slater
No Correlation
-0.23
1 player
B Heath
2 player
R Duckworth
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
B Heath
2 player
S Turner
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
B Heath
2 player
K Fraser
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.38
1 player
K Levick
2 player
E Marlow
Weak Negative Correlation
0.25
1 player
K Levick
2 player
L Scott
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
K Levick
2 player
E Burns
No Correlation
-0.04
1 player
K Levick
2 player
B Heath
No Correlation
1
1 player
K Levick
2 player
K Levick
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.17
1 player
K Levick
2 player
H Armitage
No Correlation
0.04
1 player
K Levick
2 player
S Kalis
No Correlation
-0.06
1 player
K Levick
2 player
R Slater
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
K Levick
2 player
R Duckworth
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
K Levick
2 player
S Turner
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.12
1 player
K Levick
2 player
K Fraser
No Correlation
-0.25
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
E Marlow
Weak Negative Correlation
0.5
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
L Scott
Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
E Burns
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.12
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
B Heath
No Correlation
-0.17
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
K Levick
No Correlation
1
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
H Armitage
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.48
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
S Kalis
Negative Correlation
0.18
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
R Slater
No Correlation
-0.23
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
R Duckworth
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.11
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
S Turner
No Correlation
-0.12
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
K Fraser
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
S Kalis
2 player
E Marlow
No Correlation
-0.75
1 player
S Kalis
2 player
L Scott
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
S Kalis
2 player
E Burns
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
S Kalis
2 player
B Heath
No Correlation
0.04
1 player
S Kalis
2 player
K Levick
No Correlation
-0.48
1 player
S Kalis
2 player
H Armitage
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
S Kalis
2 player
S Kalis
Strong Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
S Kalis
2 player
R Slater
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
S Kalis
2 player
R Duckworth
Negative Correlation
0.5
1 player
S Kalis
2 player
S Turner
Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
S Kalis
2 player
K Fraser
No Correlation
-0.29
1 player
R Slater
2 player
E Marlow
Weak Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
R Slater
2 player
L Scott
Positive Correlation
-0.11
1 player
R Slater
2 player
E Burns
No Correlation
-0.2
1 player
R Slater
2 player
B Heath
No Correlation
-0.06
1 player
R Slater
2 player
K Levick
No Correlation
0.18
1 player
R Slater
2 player
H Armitage
No Correlation
0.07
1 player
R Slater
2 player
S Kalis
No Correlation
1
1 player
R Slater
2 player
R Slater
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
R Slater
2 player
R Duckworth
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.25
1 player
R Slater
2 player
S Turner
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.4
1 player
R Slater
2 player
K Fraser
Weak Negative Correlation
0.23
1 player
R Duckworth
2 player
E Marlow
Weak Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
R Duckworth
2 player
L Scott
Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
R Duckworth
2 player
E Burns
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
R Duckworth
2 player
B Heath
Weak Negative Correlation
0.23
1 player
R Duckworth
2 player
K Levick
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
R Duckworth
2 player
H Armitage
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
R Duckworth
2 player
S Kalis
Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
R Duckworth
2 player
R Slater
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
R Duckworth
2 player
R Duckworth
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
R Duckworth
2 player
S Turner
Weak Negative Correlation
0.23
1 player
R Duckworth
2 player
K Fraser
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
S Turner
2 player
E Marlow
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
S Turner
2 player
L Scott
Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
S Turner
2 player
E Burns
No Correlation
0
1 player
S Turner
2 player
B Heath
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
S Turner
2 player
K Levick
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.11
1 player
S Turner
2 player
H Armitage
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
S Turner
2 player
S Kalis
Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
S Turner
2 player
R Slater
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
S Turner
2 player
R Duckworth
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
S Turner
2 player
S Turner
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
S Turner
2 player
K Fraser
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
K Fraser
2 player
E Marlow
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.43
1 player
K Fraser
2 player
L Scott
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
K Fraser
2 player
E Burns
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
K Fraser
2 player
B Heath
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.12
1 player
K Fraser
2 player
K Levick
No Correlation
-0.12
1 player
K Fraser
2 player
H Armitage
No Correlation
0.12
1 player
K Fraser
2 player
S Kalis
No Correlation
-0.4
1 player
K Fraser
2 player
R Slater
Weak Negative Correlation
0.23
1 player
K Fraser
2 player
R Duckworth
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
K Fraser
2 player
S Turner
No Correlation
1
1 player
K Fraser
2 player
K Fraser
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick L Scott and R Duckworth together
Positive Correlation

Pick E Marlow and L Scott together
Negative Correlation

Pick L Scott and S Kalis together
Negative Correlation

Pick L Scott and S Turner together
Negative Correlation

Pick S Kalis and R Duckworth together
Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 K Levick

BOW
Similar Perfomance
S Turner 0.33
L Scott 0.25
R Duckworth 0.23
S Kalis 0.04
Opposite Perfomance
E Marlow -0.38
H Armitage -0.17
K Fraser -0.12
R Slater -0.06
B Heath -0.04

2 H Armitage

AR
Similar Perfomance
L Scott 0.5
E Burns 0.2
R Slater 0.18
Opposite Perfomance
S Kalis -0.48
E Marlow -0.25
R Duckworth -0.23
K Levick -0.17
B Heath -0.12
K Fraser -0.12
S Turner -0.11

3 B Heath

WK
Similar Perfomance
L Scott 0.25
K Fraser 0.2
S Kalis 0.08
Opposite Perfomance
R Duckworth -0.23
R Slater -0.2
H Armitage -0.12
K Levick -0.04

4 S Kalis

BAT
Similar Perfomance
S Turner 0.5
E Marlow 0.14
K Fraser 0.12
B Heath 0.08
R Slater 0.07
K Levick 0.04
Opposite Perfomance
L Scott -0.75
R Duckworth -0.7
H Armitage -0.48

5 R Slater

BOW
Similar Perfomance
L Scott 0.7
H Armitage 0.18
S Kalis 0.07
Opposite Perfomance
K Fraser -0.4
E Marlow -0.29
S Turner -0.25
R Duckworth -0.23
B Heath -0.2
E Burns -0.11
K Levick -0.06

Best THN Player Combinations

Best THN Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
K Cross BOW THDER
S Morris BOW THDER
G Johnson AR THDER
K Mack BAT THDER
T Norris BOW THDER
E Threlkeld WK THDER
E Lamb BAT THDER
F Morris AR THDER
P Graham BOW THDER
L Heap BAT THDER
S Smale WK THDER
K Cross
S Morris
G Johnson
K Mack
T Norris
E Threlkeld
E Lamb
F Morris
P Graham
L Heap
S Smale
1
1 player
K Cross
2 player
K Cross
Strong Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
K Cross
2 player
S Morris
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
K Cross
2 player
G Johnson
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
K Cross
2 player
K Mack
No Correlation
-0.56
1 player
K Cross
2 player
T Norris
Negative Correlation
-0.07
1 player
K Cross
2 player
E Threlkeld
No Correlation
-0.08
1 player
K Cross
2 player
E Lamb
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
K Cross
2 player
F Morris
Positive Correlation
-0.5
1 player
K Cross
2 player
P Graham
Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
K Cross
2 player
L Heap
Weak Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
K Cross
2 player
S Smale
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
S Morris
2 player
K Cross
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
S Morris
2 player
S Morris
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
S Morris
2 player
G Johnson
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
S Morris
2 player
K Mack
Negative Correlation
-0.42
1 player
S Morris
2 player
T Norris
Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
S Morris
2 player
E Threlkeld
No Correlation
0
1 player
S Morris
2 player
E Lamb
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
S Morris
2 player
F Morris
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
S Morris
2 player
P Graham
Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
S Morris
2 player
L Heap
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
S Morris
2 player
S Smale
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
G Johnson
2 player
K Cross
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
G Johnson
2 player
S Morris
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
G Johnson
2 player
G Johnson
Strong Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
G Johnson
2 player
K Mack
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
G Johnson
2 player
T Norris
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
G Johnson
2 player
E Threlkeld
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
G Johnson
2 player
E Lamb
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
G Johnson
2 player
F Morris
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
G Johnson
2 player
P Graham
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
G Johnson
2 player
L Heap
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
G Johnson
2 player
S Smale
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
K Mack
2 player
K Cross
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
K Mack
2 player
S Morris
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
K Mack
2 player
G Johnson
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
K Mack
2 player
K Mack
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
K Mack
2 player
T Norris
No Correlation
-0.35
1 player
K Mack
2 player
E Threlkeld
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
K Mack
2 player
E Lamb
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
K Mack
2 player
F Morris
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
K Mack
2 player
P Graham
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
K Mack
2 player
L Heap
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
K Mack
2 player
S Smale
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.56
1 player
T Norris
2 player
K Cross
Negative Correlation
-0.42
1 player
T Norris
2 player
S Morris
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
T Norris
2 player
G Johnson
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
T Norris
2 player
K Mack
No Correlation
1
1 player
T Norris
2 player
T Norris
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.29
1 player
T Norris
2 player
E Threlkeld
Weak Negative Correlation
0.47
1 player
T Norris
2 player
E Lamb
Positive Correlation
-0.12
1 player
T Norris
2 player
F Morris
No Correlation
0.56
1 player
T Norris
2 player
P Graham
Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
T Norris
2 player
L Heap
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.09
1 player
T Norris
2 player
S Smale
No Correlation
-0.07
1 player
E Threlkeld
2 player
K Cross
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
E Threlkeld
2 player
S Morris
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
E Threlkeld
2 player
G Johnson
Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
E Threlkeld
2 player
K Mack
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.29
1 player
E Threlkeld
2 player
T Norris
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
E Threlkeld
2 player
E Threlkeld
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.13
1 player
E Threlkeld
2 player
E Lamb
No Correlation
-0.26
1 player
E Threlkeld
2 player
F Morris
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
E Threlkeld
2 player
P Graham
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
E Threlkeld
2 player
L Heap
No Correlation
0
1 player
E Threlkeld
2 player
S Smale
No Correlation
-0.08
1 player
E Lamb
2 player
K Cross
No Correlation
0
1 player
E Lamb
2 player
S Morris
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
E Lamb
2 player
G Johnson
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
E Lamb
2 player
K Mack
No Correlation
0.47
1 player
E Lamb
2 player
T Norris
Positive Correlation
-0.13
1 player
E Lamb
2 player
E Threlkeld
No Correlation
1
1 player
E Lamb
2 player
E Lamb
Strong Positive Correlation
0.06
1 player
E Lamb
2 player
F Morris
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
E Lamb
2 player
P Graham
No Correlation
-0.27
1 player
E Lamb
2 player
L Heap
Weak Negative Correlation
0.6
1 player
E Lamb
2 player
S Smale
Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
F Morris
2 player
K Cross
Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
F Morris
2 player
S Morris
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
F Morris
2 player
G Johnson
Negative Correlation
0.35
1 player
F Morris
2 player
K Mack
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.12
1 player
F Morris
2 player
T Norris
No Correlation
-0.26
1 player
F Morris
2 player
E Threlkeld
Weak Negative Correlation
0.06
1 player
F Morris
2 player
E Lamb
No Correlation
1
1 player
F Morris
2 player
F Morris
Strong Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
F Morris
2 player
P Graham
No Correlation
-0.54
1 player
F Morris
2 player
L Heap
Negative Correlation
-0.17
1 player
F Morris
2 player
S Smale
No Correlation
-0.5
1 player
P Graham
2 player
K Cross
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
P Graham
2 player
S Morris
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
P Graham
2 player
G Johnson
Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
P Graham
2 player
K Mack
Weak Positive Correlation
0.56
1 player
P Graham
2 player
T Norris
Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
P Graham
2 player
E Threlkeld
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
P Graham
2 player
E Lamb
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
P Graham
2 player
F Morris
No Correlation
1
1 player
P Graham
2 player
P Graham
Strong Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
P Graham
2 player
L Heap
Positive Correlation
-0.11
1 player
P Graham
2 player
S Smale
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
L Heap
2 player
K Cross
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
L Heap
2 player
S Morris
Weak Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
L Heap
2 player
G Johnson
Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
L Heap
2 player
K Mack
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
L Heap
2 player
T Norris
Weak Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
L Heap
2 player
E Threlkeld
No Correlation
-0.27
1 player
L Heap
2 player
E Lamb
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.54
1 player
L Heap
2 player
F Morris
Negative Correlation
0.42
1 player
L Heap
2 player
P Graham
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
L Heap
2 player
L Heap
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
L Heap
2 player
S Smale
Weak Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
S Smale
2 player
K Cross
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
S Smale
2 player
S Morris
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
S Smale
2 player
G Johnson
Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
S Smale
2 player
K Mack
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.09
1 player
S Smale
2 player
T Norris
No Correlation
0
1 player
S Smale
2 player
E Threlkeld
No Correlation
0.6
1 player
S Smale
2 player
E Lamb
Positive Correlation
-0.17
1 player
S Smale
2 player
F Morris
No Correlation
-0.11
1 player
S Smale
2 player
P Graham
No Correlation
-0.25
1 player
S Smale
2 player
L Heap
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
S Smale
2 player
S Smale
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick G Johnson and K Mack together
Positive Correlation

Pick G Johnson and E Lamb together
Positive Correlation

Pick G Johnson and P Graham together
Positive Correlation

Pick G Johnson and S Smale together
Positive Correlation

Pick E Lamb and S Smale together
Positive Correlation

Pick K Cross and G Johnson together
Negative Correlation

Pick S Morris and G Johnson together
Negative Correlation

Pick S Morris and K Mack together
Negative Correlation

Pick S Morris and P Graham together
Negative Correlation

Pick G Johnson and F Morris together
Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 E Lamb

BAT
Similar Perfomance
G Johnson 0.7
S Smale 0.6
T Norris 0.47
P Graham 0.14
F Morris 0.06
Opposite Perfomance
L Heap -0.27
E Threlkeld -0.13
K Cross -0.08

2 F Morris

AR
Similar Perfomance
K Cross 0.4
K Mack 0.35
P Graham 0.11
E Lamb 0.06
Opposite Perfomance
G Johnson -0.7
L Heap -0.54
E Threlkeld -0.26
S Smale -0.17
S Morris -0.14
T Norris -0.12

3 E Threlkeld

WK
Similar Perfomance
G Johnson 0.7
S Morris 0.14
L Heap 0.08
Opposite Perfomance
K Mack -0.35
T Norris -0.29
F Morris -0.26
P Graham -0.14
E Lamb -0.13
K Cross -0.07

4 K Cross

BOW
Similar Perfomance
F Morris 0.4
S Smale 0.33
S Morris 0.23
Opposite Perfomance
G Johnson -0.7
T Norris -0.56
P Graham -0.5
L Heap -0.33
E Lamb -0.08
E Threlkeld -0.07

5 T Norris

BOW
Similar Perfomance
G Johnson 0.7
P Graham 0.56
E Lamb 0.47
L Heap 0.23
Opposite Perfomance
K Cross -0.56
S Morris -0.42
E Threlkeld -0.29
F Morris -0.12
S Smale -0.09

More on PL Labs

ND vs THN

PerfectLineup © 2025. All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer - PerfectLineup is an educational tool providing detailed analysis of sports players based on their past performances. We are not associated with any gaming activity and do not host any kind of paid or free contests or pool games. Our focus is purely on data-driven solutions to enhance our users' knowledge.

Perfect Lineup is not affiliated in any way to and claims no association, in any capacity whatsoever, with the Residents of the states of SIKKIM, ASSAM, ODISHA, TELANGANA, NAGALAND, ANDHRA PRADESH and where otherwise prohibited by law are not eligible to access Perfect Lineup.

This platform is applicable for users 18+ Only