Upcoming
Fixtures
View All
PRC 13 Feb 10:00 pm VDS

Lineup Out

Boland Park
South Africa T20 Boland League

Best Player Combinations For
PRC vs VDS

How it Works?

This guide is super useful for identifying player combinations that are likely to score big. Use the filters to identify the best player combinations according to specific match scenarios.

Player correlate positively

Both players generally perform similarly when picked together. They either score high together or score low together. Maximise FPts by picking players that correlate positively with top players.

Player correlate negatively

Both players generally perform in an opposite manner. If one player scores high, the other usually scores low. Avoid picking players that correlate negatively with top player

More on PL Labs

PRC vs VDS

Show Player Combinations on the basis of:

Best PRC Player Combinations

Best PRC Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
J Visser BAT PRC
E Moses AR PRC
D Hendricks BAT PRC
T Adams BOW PRC
W September BOW PRC
J Van der sandt WK PRC
Adrian du Toit AR PRC
Tom Stevens BOW PRC
Herschelle Poggenpoel BOW PRC
Luke Philander BOW PRC
C Fortuin WK PRC
J Visser
E Moses
D Hendricks
T Adams
W September
J Van der sandt
Adrian du Toit
Tom Stevens
Herschelle Poggenpoel
Luke Philander
C Fortuin
1
1 player
J Visser
2 player
J Visser
Strong Positive Correlation
0.54
1 player
J Visser
2 player
E Moses
Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
J Visser
2 player
D Hendricks
Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
J Visser
2 player
T Adams
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.24
1 player
J Visser
2 player
W September
Weak Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
J Visser
2 player
J Van der sandt
No Correlation
-0.42
1 player
J Visser
2 player
Adrian du Toit
Negative Correlation
0.04
1 player
J Visser
2 player
Tom Stevens
No Correlation
0.26
1 player
J Visser
2 player
Herschelle Poggenpoel
Weak Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
J Visser
2 player
Luke Philander
Positive Correlation
-0.57
1 player
J Visser
2 player
C Fortuin
Negative Correlation
0.54
1 player
E Moses
2 player
J Visser
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
E Moses
2 player
E Moses
Strong Positive Correlation
0.58
1 player
E Moses
2 player
D Hendricks
Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
E Moses
2 player
T Adams
Positive Correlation
0.16
1 player
E Moses
2 player
W September
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
E Moses
2 player
J Van der sandt
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.08
1 player
E Moses
2 player
Adrian du Toit
No Correlation
-0.2
1 player
E Moses
2 player
Tom Stevens
No Correlation
0.74
1 player
E Moses
2 player
Herschelle Poggenpoel
Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
E Moses
2 player
Luke Philander
Positive Correlation
0.06
1 player
E Moses
2 player
C Fortuin
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
D Hendricks
2 player
J Visser
Positive Correlation
0.58
1 player
D Hendricks
2 player
E Moses
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
D Hendricks
2 player
D Hendricks
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
D Hendricks
2 player
T Adams
No Correlation
0.21
1 player
D Hendricks
2 player
W September
Weak Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
D Hendricks
2 player
J Van der sandt
No Correlation
-0.04
1 player
D Hendricks
2 player
Adrian du Toit
No Correlation
-0.1
1 player
D Hendricks
2 player
Tom Stevens
No Correlation
0.44
1 player
D Hendricks
2 player
Herschelle Poggenpoel
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
D Hendricks
2 player
Luke Philander
No Correlation
0.37
1 player
D Hendricks
2 player
C Fortuin
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
T Adams
2 player
J Visser
Weak Negative Correlation
0.42
1 player
T Adams
2 player
E Moses
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
T Adams
2 player
D Hendricks
No Correlation
1
1 player
T Adams
2 player
T Adams
Strong Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
T Adams
2 player
W September
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
T Adams
2 player
J Van der sandt
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
T Adams
2 player
Adrian du Toit
Weak Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
T Adams
2 player
Tom Stevens
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
T Adams
2 player
Herschelle Poggenpoel
Weak Negative Correlation
0.47
1 player
T Adams
2 player
Luke Philander
Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
T Adams
2 player
C Fortuin
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.24
1 player
W September
2 player
J Visser
Weak Negative Correlation
0.16
1 player
W September
2 player
E Moses
No Correlation
0.21
1 player
W September
2 player
D Hendricks
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
W September
2 player
T Adams
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
W September
2 player
W September
Strong Positive Correlation
0.72
1 player
W September
2 player
J Van der sandt
Positive Correlation
0.44
1 player
W September
2 player
Adrian du Toit
Positive Correlation
0.19
1 player
W September
2 player
Tom Stevens
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
W September
2 player
Herschelle Poggenpoel
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
W September
2 player
Luke Philander
Weak Positive Correlation
0.53
1 player
W September
2 player
C Fortuin
Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
J Van der sandt
2 player
J Visser
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
J Van der sandt
2 player
E Moses
Weak Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
J Van der sandt
2 player
D Hendricks
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
J Van der sandt
2 player
T Adams
Weak Positive Correlation
0.72
1 player
J Van der sandt
2 player
W September
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
J Van der sandt
2 player
J Van der sandt
Strong Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
J Van der sandt
2 player
Adrian du Toit
Weak Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
J Van der sandt
2 player
Tom Stevens
Weak Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
J Van der sandt
2 player
Herschelle Poggenpoel
Positive Correlation
0.49
1 player
J Van der sandt
2 player
Luke Philander
Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
J Van der sandt
2 player
C Fortuin
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.42
1 player
Adrian du Toit
2 player
J Visser
Negative Correlation
-0.08
1 player
Adrian du Toit
2 player
E Moses
No Correlation
-0.04
1 player
Adrian du Toit
2 player
D Hendricks
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
Adrian du Toit
2 player
T Adams
Weak Positive Correlation
0.44
1 player
Adrian du Toit
2 player
W September
Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
Adrian du Toit
2 player
J Van der sandt
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
Adrian du Toit
2 player
Adrian du Toit
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.07
1 player
Adrian du Toit
2 player
Tom Stevens
No Correlation
0.12
1 player
Adrian du Toit
2 player
Herschelle Poggenpoel
No Correlation
0.07
1 player
Adrian du Toit
2 player
Luke Philander
No Correlation
0.12
1 player
Adrian du Toit
2 player
C Fortuin
No Correlation
0.04
1 player
Tom Stevens
2 player
J Visser
No Correlation
-0.2
1 player
Tom Stevens
2 player
E Moses
No Correlation
-0.1
1 player
Tom Stevens
2 player
D Hendricks
No Correlation
0.15
1 player
Tom Stevens
2 player
T Adams
No Correlation
0.19
1 player
Tom Stevens
2 player
W September
No Correlation
0.36
1 player
Tom Stevens
2 player
J Van der sandt
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.07
1 player
Tom Stevens
2 player
Adrian du Toit
No Correlation
1
1 player
Tom Stevens
2 player
Tom Stevens
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
Tom Stevens
2 player
Herschelle Poggenpoel
No Correlation
0.18
1 player
Tom Stevens
2 player
Luke Philander
No Correlation
0.13
1 player
Tom Stevens
2 player
C Fortuin
No Correlation
0.26
1 player
Herschelle Poggenpoel
2 player
J Visser
Weak Positive Correlation
0.74
1 player
Herschelle Poggenpoel
2 player
E Moses
Positive Correlation
0.44
1 player
Herschelle Poggenpoel
2 player
D Hendricks
Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
Herschelle Poggenpoel
2 player
T Adams
Weak Negative Correlation
0.35
1 player
Herschelle Poggenpoel
2 player
W September
Weak Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
Herschelle Poggenpoel
2 player
J Van der sandt
Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
Herschelle Poggenpoel
2 player
Adrian du Toit
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
Herschelle Poggenpoel
2 player
Tom Stevens
No Correlation
1
1 player
Herschelle Poggenpoel
2 player
Herschelle Poggenpoel
Strong Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
Herschelle Poggenpoel
2 player
Luke Philander
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
Herschelle Poggenpoel
2 player
C Fortuin
Weak Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
Luke Philander
2 player
J Visser
Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
Luke Philander
2 player
E Moses
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
Luke Philander
2 player
D Hendricks
No Correlation
0.47
1 player
Luke Philander
2 player
T Adams
Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
Luke Philander
2 player
W September
Weak Positive Correlation
0.49
1 player
Luke Philander
2 player
J Van der sandt
Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
Luke Philander
2 player
Adrian du Toit
No Correlation
0.18
1 player
Luke Philander
2 player
Tom Stevens
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
Luke Philander
2 player
Herschelle Poggenpoel
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
Luke Philander
2 player
Luke Philander
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.22
1 player
Luke Philander
2 player
C Fortuin
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.57
1 player
C Fortuin
2 player
J Visser
Negative Correlation
0.06
1 player
C Fortuin
2 player
E Moses
No Correlation
0.37
1 player
C Fortuin
2 player
D Hendricks
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
C Fortuin
2 player
T Adams
Weak Positive Correlation
0.53
1 player
C Fortuin
2 player
W September
Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
C Fortuin
2 player
J Van der sandt
Weak Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
C Fortuin
2 player
Adrian du Toit
No Correlation
0.13
1 player
C Fortuin
2 player
Tom Stevens
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
C Fortuin
2 player
Herschelle Poggenpoel
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.22
1 player
C Fortuin
2 player
Luke Philander
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
C Fortuin
2 player
C Fortuin
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick J Visser and Luke Philander together
Positive Correlation

Pick E Moses and Herschelle Poggenpoel together
Positive Correlation

Pick W September and J Van der sandt together
Positive Correlation

High Performing Players

1 Adrian du Toit

AR
Similar Perfomance
W September 0.44
T Adams 0.35
J Van der sandt 0.22
Herschelle Poggenpoel 0.12
C Fortuin 0.12
Luke Philander 0.07
Opposite Perfomance
J Visser -0.42
E Moses -0.08
Tom Stevens -0.07
D Hendricks -0.04

2 W September

BOW
Similar Perfomance
J Van der sandt 0.72
C Fortuin 0.53
Adrian du Toit 0.44
T Adams 0.35
Herschelle Poggenpoel 0.35
D Hendricks 0.21
Luke Philander 0.2
Tom Stevens 0.19
E Moses 0.16
Opposite Perfomance
J Visser -0.24

3 C Fortuin

WK
Similar Perfomance
W September 0.53
D Hendricks 0.37
T Adams 0.28
Herschelle Poggenpoel 0.25
J Van der sandt 0.23
Tom Stevens 0.13
Adrian du Toit 0.12
E Moses 0.06
Opposite Perfomance
J Visser -0.57
Luke Philander -0.22

4 E Moses

AR
Similar Perfomance
Herschelle Poggenpoel 0.74
D Hendricks 0.58
J Visser 0.54
Luke Philander 0.5
T Adams 0.42
J Van der sandt 0.2
W September 0.16
C Fortuin 0.06
Opposite Perfomance
Tom Stevens -0.2
Adrian du Toit -0.08

5 J Van der sandt

WK
Similar Perfomance
W September 0.72
Herschelle Poggenpoel 0.5
Luke Philander 0.49
Tom Stevens 0.36
T Adams 0.28
C Fortuin 0.23
Adrian du Toit 0.22
E Moses 0.2
D Hendricks 0.17
J Visser 0.14

Best VDS Player Combinations

Best VDS Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
E Cunningham AR VDS
C Ayford BAT VDS
G Hulley BAT VDS
D Smith BOW VDS
T Majebe BOW VDS
R Smit BOW VDS
T Kannemeyer AR VDS
N Engelbrecht WK VDS
A Hanekom BAT VDS
N Jacobs AR VDS
Niel Lochner AR VDS
E Cunningham
C Ayford
G Hulley
D Smith
T Majebe
R Smit
T Kannemeyer
N Engelbrecht
A Hanekom
N Jacobs
Niel Lochner
1
1 player
E Cunningham
2 player
E Cunningham
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.2
1 player
E Cunningham
2 player
C Ayford
No Correlation
0.3
1 player
E Cunningham
2 player
G Hulley
Weak Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
E Cunningham
2 player
D Smith
No Correlation
0.27
1 player
E Cunningham
2 player
T Majebe
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.47
1 player
E Cunningham
2 player
R Smit
Negative Correlation
0.34
1 player
E Cunningham
2 player
T Kannemeyer
Weak Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
E Cunningham
2 player
N Engelbrecht
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.24
1 player
E Cunningham
2 player
A Hanekom
Weak Negative Correlation
0.36
1 player
E Cunningham
2 player
N Jacobs
Weak Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
E Cunningham
2 player
Niel Lochner
No Correlation
-0.2
1 player
C Ayford
2 player
E Cunningham
No Correlation
1
1 player
C Ayford
2 player
C Ayford
Strong Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
C Ayford
2 player
G Hulley
Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
C Ayford
2 player
D Smith
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
C Ayford
2 player
T Majebe
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
C Ayford
2 player
R Smit
Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
C Ayford
2 player
T Kannemeyer
Positive Correlation
0.05
1 player
C Ayford
2 player
N Engelbrecht
No Correlation
0.48
1 player
C Ayford
2 player
A Hanekom
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
C Ayford
2 player
N Jacobs
No Correlation
0.1
1 player
C Ayford
2 player
Niel Lochner
No Correlation
0.3
1 player
G Hulley
2 player
E Cunningham
Weak Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
G Hulley
2 player
C Ayford
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
G Hulley
2 player
G Hulley
Strong Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
G Hulley
2 player
D Smith
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
G Hulley
2 player
T Majebe
Weak Positive Correlation
0.16
1 player
G Hulley
2 player
R Smit
No Correlation
0.49
1 player
G Hulley
2 player
T Kannemeyer
Positive Correlation
0.46
1 player
G Hulley
2 player
N Engelbrecht
Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
G Hulley
2 player
A Hanekom
No Correlation
0.18
1 player
G Hulley
2 player
N Jacobs
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
G Hulley
2 player
Niel Lochner
Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
D Smith
2 player
E Cunningham
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
D Smith
2 player
C Ayford
Weak Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
D Smith
2 player
G Hulley
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
D Smith
2 player
D Smith
Strong Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
D Smith
2 player
T Majebe
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.28
1 player
D Smith
2 player
R Smit
Weak Negative Correlation
0.34
1 player
D Smith
2 player
T Kannemeyer
Weak Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
D Smith
2 player
N Engelbrecht
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
D Smith
2 player
A Hanekom
Weak Positive Correlation
0.45
1 player
D Smith
2 player
N Jacobs
Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
D Smith
2 player
Niel Lochner
No Correlation
0.27
1 player
T Majebe
2 player
E Cunningham
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
T Majebe
2 player
C Ayford
Negative Correlation
0.35
1 player
T Majebe
2 player
G Hulley
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
T Majebe
2 player
D Smith
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
T Majebe
2 player
T Majebe
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.15
1 player
T Majebe
2 player
R Smit
No Correlation
0.15
1 player
T Majebe
2 player
T Kannemeyer
No Correlation
0.38
1 player
T Majebe
2 player
N Engelbrecht
Weak Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
T Majebe
2 player
A Hanekom
Weak Positive Correlation
0.57
1 player
T Majebe
2 player
N Jacobs
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
T Majebe
2 player
Niel Lochner
Positive Correlation
-0.47
1 player
R Smit
2 player
E Cunningham
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
R Smit
2 player
C Ayford
Positive Correlation
0.16
1 player
R Smit
2 player
G Hulley
No Correlation
-0.28
1 player
R Smit
2 player
D Smith
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.15
1 player
R Smit
2 player
T Majebe
No Correlation
1
1 player
R Smit
2 player
R Smit
Strong Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
R Smit
2 player
T Kannemeyer
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
R Smit
2 player
N Engelbrecht
Weak Negative Correlation
0.23
1 player
R Smit
2 player
A Hanekom
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
R Smit
2 player
N Jacobs
Weak Negative Correlation
0.22
1 player
R Smit
2 player
Niel Lochner
Weak Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
T Kannemeyer
2 player
E Cunningham
Weak Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
T Kannemeyer
2 player
C Ayford
Positive Correlation
0.49
1 player
T Kannemeyer
2 player
G Hulley
Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
T Kannemeyer
2 player
D Smith
Weak Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
T Kannemeyer
2 player
T Majebe
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
T Kannemeyer
2 player
R Smit
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
T Kannemeyer
2 player
T Kannemeyer
Strong Positive Correlation
0.06
1 player
T Kannemeyer
2 player
N Engelbrecht
No Correlation
0.54
1 player
T Kannemeyer
2 player
A Hanekom
Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
T Kannemeyer
2 player
N Jacobs
Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
T Kannemeyer
2 player
Niel Lochner
No Correlation
0.22
1 player
N Engelbrecht
2 player
E Cunningham
Weak Positive Correlation
0.05
1 player
N Engelbrecht
2 player
C Ayford
No Correlation
0.46
1 player
N Engelbrecht
2 player
G Hulley
Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
N Engelbrecht
2 player
D Smith
Weak Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
N Engelbrecht
2 player
T Majebe
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
N Engelbrecht
2 player
R Smit
Weak Negative Correlation
0.06
1 player
N Engelbrecht
2 player
T Kannemeyer
No Correlation
1
1 player
N Engelbrecht
2 player
N Engelbrecht
Strong Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
N Engelbrecht
2 player
A Hanekom
No Correlation
0.21
1 player
N Engelbrecht
2 player
N Jacobs
Weak Positive Correlation
0.54
1 player
N Engelbrecht
2 player
Niel Lochner
Positive Correlation
-0.24
1 player
A Hanekom
2 player
E Cunningham
Weak Negative Correlation
0.48
1 player
A Hanekom
2 player
C Ayford
Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
A Hanekom
2 player
G Hulley
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
A Hanekom
2 player
D Smith
Weak Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
A Hanekom
2 player
T Majebe
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
A Hanekom
2 player
R Smit
Weak Positive Correlation
0.54
1 player
A Hanekom
2 player
T Kannemeyer
Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
A Hanekom
2 player
N Engelbrecht
No Correlation
1
1 player
A Hanekom
2 player
A Hanekom
Strong Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
A Hanekom
2 player
N Jacobs
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
A Hanekom
2 player
Niel Lochner
Weak Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
N Jacobs
2 player
E Cunningham
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
N Jacobs
2 player
C Ayford
No Correlation
0.18
1 player
N Jacobs
2 player
G Hulley
No Correlation
0.45
1 player
N Jacobs
2 player
D Smith
Positive Correlation
0.57
1 player
N Jacobs
2 player
T Majebe
Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
N Jacobs
2 player
R Smit
Weak Negative Correlation
0.47
1 player
N Jacobs
2 player
T Kannemeyer
Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
N Jacobs
2 player
N Engelbrecht
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
N Jacobs
2 player
A Hanekom
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
N Jacobs
2 player
N Jacobs
Strong Positive Correlation
0.03
1 player
N Jacobs
2 player
Niel Lochner
No Correlation
0.15
1 player
Niel Lochner
2 player
E Cunningham
No Correlation
0.1
1 player
Niel Lochner
2 player
C Ayford
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
Niel Lochner
2 player
G Hulley
Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
Niel Lochner
2 player
D Smith
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
Niel Lochner
2 player
T Majebe
Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
Niel Lochner
2 player
R Smit
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
Niel Lochner
2 player
T Kannemeyer
No Correlation
0.54
1 player
Niel Lochner
2 player
N Engelbrecht
Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
Niel Lochner
2 player
A Hanekom
Weak Positive Correlation
0.03
1 player
Niel Lochner
2 player
N Jacobs
No Correlation
1
1 player
Niel Lochner
2 player
Niel Lochner
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick C Ayford and R Smit together
Positive Correlation

Pick T Majebe and Niel Lochner together
Positive Correlation

Don’t pick C Ayford and T Majebe in the same lineup
Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 E Cunningham

AR
Similar Perfomance
N Jacobs 0.36
T Kannemeyer 0.34
G Hulley 0.3
T Majebe 0.27
N Engelbrecht 0.22
Niel Lochner 0.15
D Smith 0.09
Opposite Perfomance
R Smit -0.47
A Hanekom -0.24
C Ayford -0.2

2 D Smith

BOW
Similar Perfomance
N Jacobs 0.45
G Hulley 0.39
T Kannemeyer 0.34
T Majebe 0.28
C Ayford 0.25
N Engelbrecht 0.24
A Hanekom 0.2
Niel Lochner 0.18
E Cunningham 0.09
Opposite Perfomance
R Smit -0.28

3 N Jacobs

AR
Similar Perfomance
T Majebe 0.57
T Kannemeyer 0.47
D Smith 0.45
E Cunningham 0.36
A Hanekom 0.35
N Engelbrecht 0.21
G Hulley 0.18
Niel Lochner 0.03
Opposite Perfomance
R Smit -0.23

4 T Kannemeyer

AR
Similar Perfomance
A Hanekom 0.54
G Hulley 0.49
N Jacobs 0.47
C Ayford 0.42
E Cunningham 0.34
D Smith 0.34
R Smit 0.28
T Majebe 0.15
Niel Lochner 0.14
N Engelbrecht 0.06

5 N Engelbrecht

WK
Similar Perfomance
Niel Lochner 0.54
G Hulley 0.46
T Majebe 0.38
D Smith 0.24
E Cunningham 0.22
N Jacobs 0.21
A Hanekom 0.14
T Kannemeyer 0.06
C Ayford 0.05
Opposite Perfomance
R Smit -0.25

Best PRC Player Combinations

Best PRC Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
J Visser BAT PRC
E Moses AR PRC
D Hendricks BAT PRC
T Adams BOW PRC
W September BOW PRC
J Van der sandt WK PRC
Adrian du Toit AR PRC
Tom Stevens BOW PRC
Herschelle Poggenpoel BOW PRC
Luke Philander BOW PRC
C Fortuin WK PRC
J Visser
E Moses
D Hendricks
T Adams
W September
J Van der sandt
Adrian du Toit
Tom Stevens
Herschelle Poggenpoel
Luke Philander
C Fortuin
1
1 player
J Visser
2 player
J Visser
Strong Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
J Visser
2 player
E Moses
No Correlation
0
1 player
J Visser
2 player
D Hendricks
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
J Visser
2 player
T Adams
Negative Correlation
-0.42
1 player
J Visser
2 player
W September
Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
J Visser
2 player
J Van der sandt
No Correlation
-0.42
1 player
J Visser
2 player
Adrian du Toit
Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
J Visser
2 player
Tom Stevens
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
J Visser
2 player
Herschelle Poggenpoel
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
J Visser
2 player
Luke Philander
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
J Visser
2 player
C Fortuin
Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
E Moses
2 player
J Visser
No Correlation
1
1 player
E Moses
2 player
E Moses
Strong Positive Correlation
0.67
1 player
E Moses
2 player
D Hendricks
Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
E Moses
2 player
T Adams
Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
E Moses
2 player
W September
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
E Moses
2 player
J Van der sandt
No Correlation
-0.11
1 player
E Moses
2 player
Adrian du Toit
No Correlation
-0.71
1 player
E Moses
2 player
Tom Stevens
Negative Correlation
0.42
1 player
E Moses
2 player
Herschelle Poggenpoel
Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
E Moses
2 player
Luke Philander
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
E Moses
2 player
C Fortuin
No Correlation
0
1 player
D Hendricks
2 player
J Visser
No Correlation
0.67
1 player
D Hendricks
2 player
E Moses
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
D Hendricks
2 player
D Hendricks
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
D Hendricks
2 player
T Adams
Weak Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
D Hendricks
2 player
W September
No Correlation
-0.43
1 player
D Hendricks
2 player
J Van der sandt
Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
D Hendricks
2 player
Adrian du Toit
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
D Hendricks
2 player
Tom Stevens
Negative Correlation
0.42
1 player
D Hendricks
2 player
Herschelle Poggenpoel
Positive Correlation
-0.42
1 player
D Hendricks
2 player
Luke Philander
Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
D Hendricks
2 player
C Fortuin
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
T Adams
2 player
J Visser
Negative Correlation
0.42
1 player
T Adams
2 player
E Moses
Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
T Adams
2 player
D Hendricks
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
T Adams
2 player
T Adams
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
T Adams
2 player
W September
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
T Adams
2 player
J Van der sandt
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
T Adams
2 player
Adrian du Toit
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
T Adams
2 player
Tom Stevens
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
T Adams
2 player
Herschelle Poggenpoel
Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
T Adams
2 player
Luke Philander
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
T Adams
2 player
C Fortuin
No Correlation
-0.42
1 player
W September
2 player
J Visser
Negative Correlation
0.11
1 player
W September
2 player
E Moses
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
W September
2 player
D Hendricks
No Correlation
0
1 player
W September
2 player
T Adams
No Correlation
1
1 player
W September
2 player
W September
Strong Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
W September
2 player
J Van der sandt
Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
W September
2 player
Adrian du Toit
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
W September
2 player
Tom Stevens
No Correlation
0
1 player
W September
2 player
Herschelle Poggenpoel
No Correlation
-0.71
1 player
W September
2 player
Luke Philander
Negative Correlation
0.67
1 player
W September
2 player
C Fortuin
Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
J Van der sandt
2 player
J Visser
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
J Van der sandt
2 player
E Moses
No Correlation
-0.43
1 player
J Van der sandt
2 player
D Hendricks
Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
J Van der sandt
2 player
T Adams
Weak Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
J Van der sandt
2 player
W September
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
J Van der sandt
2 player
J Van der sandt
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
J Van der sandt
2 player
Adrian du Toit
No Correlation
0.43
1 player
J Van der sandt
2 player
Tom Stevens
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
J Van der sandt
2 player
Herschelle Poggenpoel
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
J Van der sandt
2 player
Luke Philander
No Correlation
0
1 player
J Van der sandt
2 player
C Fortuin
No Correlation
-0.42
1 player
Adrian du Toit
2 player
J Visser
Negative Correlation
-0.11
1 player
Adrian du Toit
2 player
E Moses
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
Adrian du Toit
2 player
D Hendricks
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
Adrian du Toit
2 player
T Adams
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
Adrian du Toit
2 player
W September
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
Adrian du Toit
2 player
J Van der sandt
No Correlation
1
1 player
Adrian du Toit
2 player
Adrian du Toit
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.43
1 player
Adrian du Toit
2 player
Tom Stevens
Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
Adrian du Toit
2 player
Herschelle Poggenpoel
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
Adrian du Toit
2 player
Luke Philander
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
Adrian du Toit
2 player
C Fortuin
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
Tom Stevens
2 player
J Visser
No Correlation
-0.71
1 player
Tom Stevens
2 player
E Moses
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
Tom Stevens
2 player
D Hendricks
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
Tom Stevens
2 player
T Adams
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
Tom Stevens
2 player
W September
No Correlation
0.43
1 player
Tom Stevens
2 player
J Van der sandt
Positive Correlation
-0.43
1 player
Tom Stevens
2 player
Adrian du Toit
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
Tom Stevens
2 player
Tom Stevens
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.42
1 player
Tom Stevens
2 player
Herschelle Poggenpoel
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
Tom Stevens
2 player
Luke Philander
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
Tom Stevens
2 player
C Fortuin
Weak Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
Herschelle Poggenpoel
2 player
J Visser
Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
Herschelle Poggenpoel
2 player
E Moses
Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
Herschelle Poggenpoel
2 player
D Hendricks
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
Herschelle Poggenpoel
2 player
T Adams
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
Herschelle Poggenpoel
2 player
W September
No Correlation
0
1 player
Herschelle Poggenpoel
2 player
J Van der sandt
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
Herschelle Poggenpoel
2 player
Adrian du Toit
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.42
1 player
Herschelle Poggenpoel
2 player
Tom Stevens
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
Herschelle Poggenpoel
2 player
Herschelle Poggenpoel
Strong Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
Herschelle Poggenpoel
2 player
Luke Philander
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
Herschelle Poggenpoel
2 player
C Fortuin
Weak Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
Luke Philander
2 player
J Visser
Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
Luke Philander
2 player
E Moses
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.42
1 player
Luke Philander
2 player
D Hendricks
Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
Luke Philander
2 player
T Adams
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.71
1 player
Luke Philander
2 player
W September
Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
Luke Philander
2 player
J Van der sandt
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
Luke Philander
2 player
Adrian du Toit
No Correlation
0
1 player
Luke Philander
2 player
Tom Stevens
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
Luke Philander
2 player
Herschelle Poggenpoel
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
Luke Philander
2 player
Luke Philander
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
Luke Philander
2 player
C Fortuin
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
C Fortuin
2 player
J Visser
Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
C Fortuin
2 player
E Moses
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
C Fortuin
2 player
D Hendricks
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
C Fortuin
2 player
T Adams
No Correlation
0.67
1 player
C Fortuin
2 player
W September
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
C Fortuin
2 player
J Van der sandt
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
C Fortuin
2 player
Adrian du Toit
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
C Fortuin
2 player
Tom Stevens
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
C Fortuin
2 player
Herschelle Poggenpoel
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
C Fortuin
2 player
Luke Philander
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
C Fortuin
2 player
C Fortuin
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick E Moses and D Hendricks together
Positive Correlation

Pick W September and C Fortuin together
Positive Correlation

Pick J Visser and T Adams together
Negative Correlation

Pick J Visser and C Fortuin together
Negative Correlation

Pick E Moses and Tom Stevens together
Negative Correlation

Pick D Hendricks and Tom Stevens together
Negative Correlation

Pick T Adams and Herschelle Poggenpoel together
Negative Correlation

Pick W September and Luke Philander together
Negative Correlation

Pick Luke Philander and C Fortuin together
Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 Adrian du Toit

AR
Similar Perfomance
T Adams 0.33
C Fortuin 0.33
W September 0.2
Opposite Perfomance
Tom Stevens -0.43
J Visser -0.42
Herschelle Poggenpoel -0.33
D Hendricks -0.14
Luke Philander -0.14
E Moses -0.11

2 W September

BOW
Similar Perfomance
C Fortuin 0.67
J Van der sandt 0.4
Adrian du Toit 0.2
D Hendricks 0.14
E Moses 0.11
Opposite Perfomance
Luke Philander -0.71
J Visser -0.42
Tom Stevens -0.14

3 C Fortuin

WK
Similar Perfomance
W September 0.67
D Hendricks 0.33
Adrian du Toit 0.33
Tom Stevens 0.23
Opposite Perfomance
J Visser -0.7
Luke Philander -0.7
Herschelle Poggenpoel -0.35
E Moses -0.14

4 D Hendricks

BAT
Similar Perfomance
E Moses 0.67
Herschelle Poggenpoel 0.42
C Fortuin 0.33
W September 0.14
Opposite Perfomance
Tom Stevens -0.7
J Van der sandt -0.43
Luke Philander -0.42
T Adams -0.35
Adrian du Toit -0.14

5 E Moses

AR
Similar Perfomance
D Hendricks 0.67
T Adams 0.42
Herschelle Poggenpoel 0.42
Luke Philander 0.33
J Visser 0.14
W September 0.11
J Van der sandt 0.11
Opposite Perfomance
Tom Stevens -0.71
C Fortuin -0.14
Adrian du Toit -0.11

Best VDS Player Combinations

Best VDS Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
E Cunningham AR VDS
C Ayford BAT VDS
G Hulley BAT VDS
D Smith BOW VDS
T Majebe BOW VDS
R Smit BOW VDS
T Kannemeyer AR VDS
N Engelbrecht WK VDS
A Hanekom BAT VDS
N Jacobs AR VDS
Niel Lochner AR VDS
E Cunningham
C Ayford
G Hulley
D Smith
T Majebe
R Smit
T Kannemeyer
N Engelbrecht
A Hanekom
N Jacobs
Niel Lochner
1
1 player
E Cunningham
2 player
E Cunningham
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
E Cunningham
2 player
C Ayford
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
E Cunningham
2 player
G Hulley
No Correlation
-0.43
1 player
E Cunningham
2 player
D Smith
Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
E Cunningham
2 player
T Majebe
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
E Cunningham
2 player
R Smit
Weak Negative Correlation
0.42
1 player
E Cunningham
2 player
T Kannemeyer
Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
E Cunningham
2 player
N Engelbrecht
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.42
1 player
E Cunningham
2 player
A Hanekom
Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
E Cunningham
2 player
N Jacobs
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
E Cunningham
2 player
Niel Lochner
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
C Ayford
2 player
E Cunningham
No Correlation
1
1 player
C Ayford
2 player
C Ayford
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
C Ayford
2 player
G Hulley
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
C Ayford
2 player
D Smith
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
C Ayford
2 player
T Majebe
Negative Correlation
0.23
1 player
C Ayford
2 player
R Smit
Weak Positive Correlation
0.67
1 player
C Ayford
2 player
T Kannemeyer
Positive Correlation
-0.67
1 player
C Ayford
2 player
N Engelbrecht
Negative Correlation
0.42
1 player
C Ayford
2 player
A Hanekom
Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
C Ayford
2 player
N Jacobs
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
C Ayford
2 player
Niel Lochner
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
G Hulley
2 player
E Cunningham
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
G Hulley
2 player
C Ayford
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
G Hulley
2 player
G Hulley
Strong Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
G Hulley
2 player
D Smith
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
G Hulley
2 player
T Majebe
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
G Hulley
2 player
R Smit
Negative Correlation
0.25
1 player
G Hulley
2 player
T Kannemeyer
Weak Positive Correlation
0.71
1 player
G Hulley
2 player
N Engelbrecht
Positive Correlation
-0.42
1 player
G Hulley
2 player
A Hanekom
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
G Hulley
2 player
N Jacobs
No Correlation
0
1 player
G Hulley
2 player
Niel Lochner
No Correlation
-0.43
1 player
D Smith
2 player
E Cunningham
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
D Smith
2 player
C Ayford
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
D Smith
2 player
G Hulley
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
D Smith
2 player
D Smith
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
D Smith
2 player
T Majebe
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.35
1 player
D Smith
2 player
R Smit
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.25
1 player
D Smith
2 player
T Kannemeyer
Weak Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
D Smith
2 player
N Engelbrecht
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
D Smith
2 player
A Hanekom
No Correlation
-0.25
1 player
D Smith
2 player
N Jacobs
Weak Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
D Smith
2 player
Niel Lochner
No Correlation
-0.23
1 player
T Majebe
2 player
E Cunningham
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
T Majebe
2 player
C Ayford
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
T Majebe
2 player
G Hulley
No Correlation
-0.35
1 player
T Majebe
2 player
D Smith
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
T Majebe
2 player
T Majebe
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
T Majebe
2 player
R Smit
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
T Majebe
2 player
T Kannemeyer
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
T Majebe
2 player
N Engelbrecht
No Correlation
-0.23
1 player
T Majebe
2 player
A Hanekom
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
T Majebe
2 player
N Jacobs
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
T Majebe
2 player
Niel Lochner
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
R Smit
2 player
E Cunningham
Weak Negative Correlation
0.23
1 player
R Smit
2 player
C Ayford
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
R Smit
2 player
G Hulley
Negative Correlation
-0.35
1 player
R Smit
2 player
D Smith
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
R Smit
2 player
T Majebe
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
R Smit
2 player
R Smit
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
R Smit
2 player
T Kannemeyer
No Correlation
-0.23
1 player
R Smit
2 player
N Engelbrecht
Weak Negative Correlation
0.23
1 player
R Smit
2 player
A Hanekom
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
R Smit
2 player
N Jacobs
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
R Smit
2 player
Niel Lochner
Weak Negative Correlation
0.42
1 player
T Kannemeyer
2 player
E Cunningham
Positive Correlation
0.67
1 player
T Kannemeyer
2 player
C Ayford
Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
T Kannemeyer
2 player
G Hulley
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
T Kannemeyer
2 player
D Smith
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
T Kannemeyer
2 player
T Majebe
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
T Kannemeyer
2 player
R Smit
No Correlation
1
1 player
T Kannemeyer
2 player
T Kannemeyer
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
T Kannemeyer
2 player
N Engelbrecht
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
T Kannemeyer
2 player
A Hanekom
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
T Kannemeyer
2 player
N Jacobs
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
T Kannemeyer
2 player
Niel Lochner
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
N Engelbrecht
2 player
E Cunningham
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.67
1 player
N Engelbrecht
2 player
C Ayford
Negative Correlation
0.71
1 player
N Engelbrecht
2 player
G Hulley
Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
N Engelbrecht
2 player
D Smith
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
N Engelbrecht
2 player
T Majebe
No Correlation
-0.23
1 player
N Engelbrecht
2 player
R Smit
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
N Engelbrecht
2 player
T Kannemeyer
No Correlation
1
1 player
N Engelbrecht
2 player
N Engelbrecht
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.43
1 player
N Engelbrecht
2 player
A Hanekom
Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
N Engelbrecht
2 player
N Jacobs
No Correlation
-0.42
1 player
N Engelbrecht
2 player
Niel Lochner
Negative Correlation
-0.42
1 player
A Hanekom
2 player
E Cunningham
Negative Correlation
0.42
1 player
A Hanekom
2 player
C Ayford
Positive Correlation
-0.42
1 player
A Hanekom
2 player
G Hulley
Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
A Hanekom
2 player
D Smith
No Correlation
-0.23
1 player
A Hanekom
2 player
T Majebe
Weak Negative Correlation
0.23
1 player
A Hanekom
2 player
R Smit
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
A Hanekom
2 player
T Kannemeyer
No Correlation
-0.43
1 player
A Hanekom
2 player
N Engelbrecht
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
A Hanekom
2 player
A Hanekom
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
A Hanekom
2 player
N Jacobs
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Hanekom
2 player
Niel Lochner
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
N Jacobs
2 player
E Cunningham
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
N Jacobs
2 player
C Ayford
No Correlation
0
1 player
N Jacobs
2 player
G Hulley
No Correlation
-0.25
1 player
N Jacobs
2 player
D Smith
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
N Jacobs
2 player
T Majebe
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
N Jacobs
2 player
R Smit
Weak Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
N Jacobs
2 player
T Kannemeyer
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
N Jacobs
2 player
N Engelbrecht
No Correlation
0
1 player
N Jacobs
2 player
A Hanekom
No Correlation
1
1 player
N Jacobs
2 player
N Jacobs
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
N Jacobs
2 player
Niel Lochner
Weak Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
Niel Lochner
2 player
E Cunningham
Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
Niel Lochner
2 player
C Ayford
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
Niel Lochner
2 player
G Hulley
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
Niel Lochner
2 player
D Smith
No Correlation
-0.23
1 player
Niel Lochner
2 player
T Majebe
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
Niel Lochner
2 player
R Smit
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
Niel Lochner
2 player
T Kannemeyer
No Correlation
-0.42
1 player
Niel Lochner
2 player
N Engelbrecht
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
Niel Lochner
2 player
A Hanekom
No Correlation
-0.23
1 player
Niel Lochner
2 player
N Jacobs
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
Niel Lochner
2 player
Niel Lochner
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick E Cunningham and Niel Lochner together
Positive Correlation

Pick C Ayford and T Kannemeyer together
Positive Correlation

Pick G Hulley and N Engelbrecht together
Positive Correlation

Pick C Ayford and N Engelbrecht together
Negative Correlation

Pick G Hulley and R Smit together
Negative Correlation

Pick T Majebe and R Smit together
Negative Correlation

Pick T Majebe and T Kannemeyer together
Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 E Cunningham

AR
Similar Perfomance
Niel Lochner 0.7
T Kannemeyer 0.42
G Hulley 0.14
N Jacobs 0.14
Opposite Perfomance
D Smith -0.43
A Hanekom -0.42
N Engelbrecht -0.33
T Majebe -0.23
R Smit -0.23

2 G Hulley

BAT
Similar Perfomance
N Engelbrecht 0.71
D Smith 0.5
T Kannemeyer 0.25
E Cunningham 0.14
Opposite Perfomance
R Smit -0.7
A Hanekom -0.42
C Ayford -0.33

3 N Jacobs

AR
Similar Perfomance
T Kannemeyer 0.33
E Cunningham 0.14
Opposite Perfomance
D Smith -0.25
T Majebe -0.23
R Smit -0.23
Niel Lochner -0.23
C Ayford -0.14
N Engelbrecht -0.14

4 D Smith

BOW
Similar Perfomance
G Hulley 0.5
N Engelbrecht 0.33
Niel Lochner 0.14
Opposite Perfomance
E Cunningham -0.43
T Majebe -0.35
R Smit -0.35
T Kannemeyer -0.25
N Jacobs -0.25
A Hanekom -0.14

5 T Kannemeyer

AR
Similar Perfomance
C Ayford 0.67
E Cunningham 0.42
N Jacobs 0.33
G Hulley 0.25
A Hanekom 0.14
Opposite Perfomance
T Majebe -0.7
D Smith -0.25
N Engelbrecht -0.14

More on PL Labs

PRC vs VDS

PerfectLineup © 2025. All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer - PerfectLineup is an educational tool providing detailed analysis of sports players based on their past performances. We are not associated with any gaming activity and do not host any kind of paid or free contests or pool games. Our focus is purely on data-driven solutions to enhance our users' knowledge.

Perfect Lineup is not affiliated in any way to and claims no association, in any capacity whatsoever, with the Residents of the states of SIKKIM, ASSAM, ODISHA, TELANGANA, NAGALAND, ANDHRA PRADESH and where otherwise prohibited by law are not eligible to access Perfect Lineup.

This platform is applicable for users 18+ Only