Upcoming
Fixtures
View All
RMC 16 Mar 12:00 am MTK

Lineup Out

Cartama Oval
European T10 Cricket League

Best Player Combinations For
RMC vs MTK

How it Works?

This guide is super useful for identifying player combinations that are likely to score big. Use the filters to identify the best player combinations according to specific match scenarios.

Player correlate positively

Both players generally perform similarly when picked together. They either score high together or score low together. Maximise FPts by picking players that correlate positively with top players.

Player correlate negatively

Both players generally perform in an opposite manner. If one player scores high, the other usually scores low. Avoid picking players that correlate negatively with top player

More on PL Labs

RMC vs MTK

Show Player Combinations on the basis of:

Best RMC Player Combinations

Best RMC Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
Z Ali AR RMC
A Naththandige BOW RMC
C Fernando AR RMC
M Kanageshwaram AR RMC
B Khan BOW RMC
S Rillagodage WK RMC
D Marage BAT RMC
C Kalugamage BOW RMC
D Seneviratne BAT RMC
M Siriwardana AR RMC
P Samarage AR RMC
Z Ali
A Naththandige
C Fernando
M Kanageshwaram
B Khan
S Rillagodage
D Marage
C Kalugamage
D Seneviratne
M Siriwardana
P Samarage
1
1 player
Z Ali
2 player
Z Ali
Strong Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
Z Ali
2 player
A Naththandige
Weak Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
Z Ali
2 player
C Fernando
Positive Correlation
0.03
1 player
Z Ali
2 player
M Kanageshwaram
No Correlation
0.12
1 player
Z Ali
2 player
B Khan
No Correlation
0.31
1 player
Z Ali
2 player
S Rillagodage
Weak Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
Z Ali
2 player
D Marage
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
Z Ali
2 player
C Kalugamage
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
Z Ali
2 player
D Seneviratne
No Correlation
0.49
1 player
Z Ali
2 player
M Siriwardana
Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
Z Ali
2 player
P Samarage
No Correlation
0.22
1 player
A Naththandige
2 player
Z Ali
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
A Naththandige
2 player
A Naththandige
Strong Positive Correlation
0.19
1 player
A Naththandige
2 player
C Fernando
No Correlation
0.31
1 player
A Naththandige
2 player
M Kanageshwaram
Weak Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
A Naththandige
2 player
B Khan
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
A Naththandige
2 player
S Rillagodage
Weak Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
A Naththandige
2 player
D Marage
Weak Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
A Naththandige
2 player
C Kalugamage
No Correlation
0.32
1 player
A Naththandige
2 player
D Seneviratne
Weak Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
A Naththandige
2 player
M Siriwardana
Weak Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
A Naththandige
2 player
P Samarage
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
C Fernando
2 player
Z Ali
Positive Correlation
0.19
1 player
C Fernando
2 player
A Naththandige
No Correlation
1
1 player
C Fernando
2 player
C Fernando
Strong Positive Correlation
0.05
1 player
C Fernando
2 player
M Kanageshwaram
No Correlation
0.26
1 player
C Fernando
2 player
B Khan
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
C Fernando
2 player
S Rillagodage
Weak Positive Correlation
0.29
1 player
C Fernando
2 player
D Marage
Weak Positive Correlation
0.56
1 player
C Fernando
2 player
C Kalugamage
Positive Correlation
-0.15
1 player
C Fernando
2 player
D Seneviratne
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
C Fernando
2 player
M Siriwardana
Weak Positive Correlation
0.37
1 player
C Fernando
2 player
P Samarage
Weak Positive Correlation
0.03
1 player
M Kanageshwaram
2 player
Z Ali
No Correlation
0.31
1 player
M Kanageshwaram
2 player
A Naththandige
Weak Positive Correlation
0.05
1 player
M Kanageshwaram
2 player
C Fernando
No Correlation
1
1 player
M Kanageshwaram
2 player
M Kanageshwaram
Strong Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
M Kanageshwaram
2 player
B Khan
Weak Positive Correlation
0.54
1 player
M Kanageshwaram
2 player
S Rillagodage
Positive Correlation
0.02
1 player
M Kanageshwaram
2 player
D Marage
No Correlation
-0.03
1 player
M Kanageshwaram
2 player
C Kalugamage
No Correlation
0.41
1 player
M Kanageshwaram
2 player
D Seneviratne
Positive Correlation
-0.06
1 player
M Kanageshwaram
2 player
M Siriwardana
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
M Kanageshwaram
2 player
P Samarage
Weak Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
B Khan
2 player
Z Ali
No Correlation
0.18
1 player
B Khan
2 player
A Naththandige
No Correlation
0.26
1 player
B Khan
2 player
C Fernando
Weak Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
B Khan
2 player
M Kanageshwaram
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
B Khan
2 player
B Khan
Strong Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
B Khan
2 player
S Rillagodage
Weak Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
B Khan
2 player
D Marage
Weak Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
B Khan
2 player
C Kalugamage
No Correlation
-0.04
1 player
B Khan
2 player
D Seneviratne
No Correlation
0.07
1 player
B Khan
2 player
M Siriwardana
No Correlation
0.19
1 player
B Khan
2 player
P Samarage
No Correlation
0.31
1 player
S Rillagodage
2 player
Z Ali
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
S Rillagodage
2 player
A Naththandige
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
S Rillagodage
2 player
C Fernando
Weak Positive Correlation
0.54
1 player
S Rillagodage
2 player
M Kanageshwaram
Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
S Rillagodage
2 player
B Khan
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
S Rillagodage
2 player
S Rillagodage
Strong Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
S Rillagodage
2 player
D Marage
Weak Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
S Rillagodage
2 player
C Kalugamage
No Correlation
0.31
1 player
S Rillagodage
2 player
D Seneviratne
Weak Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
S Rillagodage
2 player
M Siriwardana
Weak Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
S Rillagodage
2 player
P Samarage
Weak Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
D Marage
2 player
Z Ali
Weak Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
D Marage
2 player
A Naththandige
Weak Positive Correlation
0.29
1 player
D Marage
2 player
C Fernando
Weak Positive Correlation
0.02
1 player
D Marage
2 player
M Kanageshwaram
No Correlation
0.3
1 player
D Marage
2 player
B Khan
Weak Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
D Marage
2 player
S Rillagodage
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
D Marage
2 player
D Marage
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.05
1 player
D Marage
2 player
C Kalugamage
No Correlation
-0.06
1 player
D Marage
2 player
D Seneviratne
No Correlation
0.3
1 player
D Marage
2 player
M Siriwardana
Weak Positive Correlation
0.29
1 player
D Marage
2 player
P Samarage
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
C Kalugamage
2 player
Z Ali
Weak Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
C Kalugamage
2 player
A Naththandige
No Correlation
0.56
1 player
C Kalugamage
2 player
C Fernando
Positive Correlation
-0.03
1 player
C Kalugamage
2 player
M Kanageshwaram
No Correlation
0.12
1 player
C Kalugamage
2 player
B Khan
No Correlation
0.15
1 player
C Kalugamage
2 player
S Rillagodage
No Correlation
-0.05
1 player
C Kalugamage
2 player
D Marage
No Correlation
1
1 player
C Kalugamage
2 player
C Kalugamage
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
C Kalugamage
2 player
D Seneviratne
No Correlation
0.18
1 player
C Kalugamage
2 player
M Siriwardana
No Correlation
0.15
1 player
C Kalugamage
2 player
P Samarage
No Correlation
0
1 player
D Seneviratne
2 player
Z Ali
No Correlation
0.32
1 player
D Seneviratne
2 player
A Naththandige
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.15
1 player
D Seneviratne
2 player
C Fernando
No Correlation
0.41
1 player
D Seneviratne
2 player
M Kanageshwaram
Positive Correlation
-0.04
1 player
D Seneviratne
2 player
B Khan
No Correlation
0.31
1 player
D Seneviratne
2 player
S Rillagodage
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.06
1 player
D Seneviratne
2 player
D Marage
No Correlation
0
1 player
D Seneviratne
2 player
C Kalugamage
No Correlation
1
1 player
D Seneviratne
2 player
D Seneviratne
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
D Seneviratne
2 player
M Siriwardana
No Correlation
-0.13
1 player
D Seneviratne
2 player
P Samarage
No Correlation
0.49
1 player
M Siriwardana
2 player
Z Ali
Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
M Siriwardana
2 player
A Naththandige
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
M Siriwardana
2 player
C Fernando
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.06
1 player
M Siriwardana
2 player
M Kanageshwaram
No Correlation
0.07
1 player
M Siriwardana
2 player
B Khan
No Correlation
0.39
1 player
M Siriwardana
2 player
S Rillagodage
Weak Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
M Siriwardana
2 player
D Marage
Weak Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
M Siriwardana
2 player
C Kalugamage
No Correlation
0
1 player
M Siriwardana
2 player
D Seneviratne
No Correlation
1
1 player
M Siriwardana
2 player
M Siriwardana
Strong Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
M Siriwardana
2 player
P Samarage
Weak Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
P Samarage
2 player
Z Ali
No Correlation
0.18
1 player
P Samarage
2 player
A Naththandige
No Correlation
0.37
1 player
P Samarage
2 player
C Fernando
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
P Samarage
2 player
M Kanageshwaram
Weak Positive Correlation
0.19
1 player
P Samarage
2 player
B Khan
No Correlation
0.38
1 player
P Samarage
2 player
S Rillagodage
Weak Positive Correlation
0.29
1 player
P Samarage
2 player
D Marage
Weak Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
P Samarage
2 player
C Kalugamage
No Correlation
-0.13
1 player
P Samarage
2 player
D Seneviratne
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
P Samarage
2 player
M Siriwardana
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
P Samarage
2 player
P Samarage
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

No data found

High Performing Players

1 C Fernando

AR
Similar Perfomance
C Kalugamage 0.56
Z Ali 0.42
P Samarage 0.37
M Siriwardana 0.33
D Marage 0.29
B Khan 0.26
S Rillagodage 0.2
A Naththandige 0.19
M Kanageshwaram 0.05
Opposite Perfomance
D Seneviratne -0.15

2 P Samarage

AR
Similar Perfomance
S Rillagodage 0.38
C Fernando 0.37
M Kanageshwaram 0.33
D Marage 0.29
M Siriwardana 0.23
B Khan 0.19
A Naththandige 0.18
C Kalugamage 0.15
Z Ali 0.09
Opposite Perfomance
D Seneviratne -0.13

3 D Marage

BAT
Similar Perfomance
S Rillagodage 0.32
B Khan 0.3
M Siriwardana 0.3
C Fernando 0.29
P Samarage 0.29
A Naththandige 0.24
Z Ali 0.21
M Kanageshwaram 0.02
Opposite Perfomance
D Seneviratne -0.06
C Kalugamage -0.05

4 C Kalugamage

BOW
Similar Perfomance
C Fernando 0.56
Z Ali 0.35
A Naththandige 0.18
M Siriwardana 0.18
S Rillagodage 0.15
P Samarage 0.15
B Khan 0.12
Opposite Perfomance
D Marage -0.05
M Kanageshwaram -0.03

5 M Siriwardana

AR
Similar Perfomance
Z Ali 0.49
S Rillagodage 0.39
C Fernando 0.33
D Marage 0.3
A Naththandige 0.26
P Samarage 0.23
C Kalugamage 0.18
B Khan 0.07
Opposite Perfomance
M Kanageshwaram -0.06

Best MTK Player Combinations

Best MTK Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
J Riley BOW MTK
L Burns AR MTK
A Hillman WK MTK
C Packard BAT MTK
K Nestor BAT MTK
T Singh-I BAT MTK
L Bruce AR MTK
S Bodha BOW MTK
M Nayak AR MTK
M Whelan BOW MTK
I Latin AR MTK
J Riley
L Burns
A Hillman
C Packard
K Nestor
T Singh-I
L Bruce
S Bodha
M Nayak
M Whelan
I Latin
1
1 player
J Riley
2 player
J Riley
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
J Riley
2 player
L Burns
No Correlation
0
1 player
J Riley
2 player
A Hillman
No Correlation
0
1 player
J Riley
2 player
C Packard
No Correlation
0
1 player
J Riley
2 player
K Nestor
No Correlation
0
1 player
J Riley
2 player
T Singh-I
No Correlation
0
1 player
J Riley
2 player
L Bruce
No Correlation
0
1 player
J Riley
2 player
S Bodha
No Correlation
0
1 player
J Riley
2 player
M Nayak
No Correlation
0
1 player
J Riley
2 player
M Whelan
No Correlation
0
1 player
J Riley
2 player
I Latin
No Correlation
0
1 player
L Burns
2 player
J Riley
No Correlation
1
1 player
L Burns
2 player
L Burns
Strong Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
L Burns
2 player
A Hillman
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
L Burns
2 player
C Packard
Weak Positive Correlation
0.03
1 player
L Burns
2 player
K Nestor
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
L Burns
2 player
T Singh-I
Positive Correlation
0.77
1 player
L Burns
2 player
L Bruce
Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
L Burns
2 player
S Bodha
Weak Positive Correlation
0.77
1 player
L Burns
2 player
M Nayak
Positive Correlation
-0.55
1 player
L Burns
2 player
M Whelan
Negative Correlation
0.1
1 player
L Burns
2 player
I Latin
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Hillman
2 player
J Riley
No Correlation
0.38
1 player
A Hillman
2 player
L Burns
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
A Hillman
2 player
A Hillman
Strong Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
A Hillman
2 player
C Packard
No Correlation
0.53
1 player
A Hillman
2 player
K Nestor
Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
A Hillman
2 player
T Singh-I
Positive Correlation
0.45
1 player
A Hillman
2 player
L Bruce
Positive Correlation
0.85
1 player
A Hillman
2 player
S Bodha
Strong Positive Correlation
0.6
1 player
A Hillman
2 player
M Nayak
Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
A Hillman
2 player
M Whelan
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
A Hillman
2 player
I Latin
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
C Packard
2 player
J Riley
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
C Packard
2 player
L Burns
Weak Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
C Packard
2 player
A Hillman
No Correlation
1
1 player
C Packard
2 player
C Packard
Strong Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
C Packard
2 player
K Nestor
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.08
1 player
C Packard
2 player
T Singh-I
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
C Packard
2 player
L Bruce
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
C Packard
2 player
S Bodha
Weak Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
C Packard
2 player
M Nayak
Weak Positive Correlation
0.55
1 player
C Packard
2 player
M Whelan
Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
C Packard
2 player
I Latin
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
K Nestor
2 player
J Riley
No Correlation
0.03
1 player
K Nestor
2 player
L Burns
No Correlation
0.53
1 player
K Nestor
2 player
A Hillman
Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
K Nestor
2 player
C Packard
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
K Nestor
2 player
K Nestor
Strong Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
K Nestor
2 player
T Singh-I
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
K Nestor
2 player
L Bruce
No Correlation
0.67
1 player
K Nestor
2 player
S Bodha
Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
K Nestor
2 player
M Nayak
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
K Nestor
2 player
M Whelan
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
K Nestor
2 player
I Latin
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
T Singh-I
2 player
J Riley
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
T Singh-I
2 player
L Burns
Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
T Singh-I
2 player
A Hillman
Positive Correlation
-0.08
1 player
T Singh-I
2 player
C Packard
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
T Singh-I
2 player
K Nestor
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
T Singh-I
2 player
T Singh-I
Strong Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
T Singh-I
2 player
L Bruce
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
T Singh-I
2 player
S Bodha
Weak Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
T Singh-I
2 player
M Nayak
Positive Correlation
-0.55
1 player
T Singh-I
2 player
M Whelan
Negative Correlation
-0.15
1 player
T Singh-I
2 player
I Latin
No Correlation
0
1 player
L Bruce
2 player
J Riley
No Correlation
0.77
1 player
L Bruce
2 player
L Burns
Positive Correlation
0.45
1 player
L Bruce
2 player
A Hillman
Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
L Bruce
2 player
C Packard
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
L Bruce
2 player
K Nestor
No Correlation
0.38
1 player
L Bruce
2 player
T Singh-I
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
L Bruce
2 player
L Bruce
Strong Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
L Bruce
2 player
S Bodha
Weak Positive Correlation
0.52
1 player
L Bruce
2 player
M Nayak
Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
L Bruce
2 player
M Whelan
Weak Negative Correlation
0.32
1 player
L Bruce
2 player
I Latin
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
S Bodha
2 player
J Riley
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
S Bodha
2 player
L Burns
Weak Positive Correlation
0.85
1 player
S Bodha
2 player
A Hillman
Strong Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
S Bodha
2 player
C Packard
Weak Positive Correlation
0.67
1 player
S Bodha
2 player
K Nestor
Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
S Bodha
2 player
T Singh-I
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
S Bodha
2 player
L Bruce
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
S Bodha
2 player
S Bodha
Strong Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
S Bodha
2 player
M Nayak
Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
S Bodha
2 player
M Whelan
Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
S Bodha
2 player
I Latin
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
M Nayak
2 player
J Riley
No Correlation
0.77
1 player
M Nayak
2 player
L Burns
Positive Correlation
0.6
1 player
M Nayak
2 player
A Hillman
Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
M Nayak
2 player
C Packard
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
M Nayak
2 player
K Nestor
Weak Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
M Nayak
2 player
T Singh-I
Positive Correlation
0.52
1 player
M Nayak
2 player
L Bruce
Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
M Nayak
2 player
S Bodha
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M Nayak
2 player
M Nayak
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.4
1 player
M Nayak
2 player
M Whelan
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
M Nayak
2 player
I Latin
No Correlation
0
1 player
M Whelan
2 player
J Riley
No Correlation
-0.55
1 player
M Whelan
2 player
L Burns
Negative Correlation
0.15
1 player
M Whelan
2 player
A Hillman
No Correlation
0.55
1 player
M Whelan
2 player
C Packard
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
M Whelan
2 player
K Nestor
No Correlation
-0.55
1 player
M Whelan
2 player
T Singh-I
Negative Correlation
-0.35
1 player
M Whelan
2 player
L Bruce
Weak Negative Correlation
0.5
1 player
M Whelan
2 player
S Bodha
Positive Correlation
-0.4
1 player
M Whelan
2 player
M Nayak
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
M Whelan
2 player
M Whelan
Strong Positive Correlation
0.55
1 player
M Whelan
2 player
I Latin
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
I Latin
2 player
J Riley
No Correlation
0.1
1 player
I Latin
2 player
L Burns
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
I Latin
2 player
A Hillman
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
I Latin
2 player
C Packard
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
I Latin
2 player
K Nestor
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.15
1 player
I Latin
2 player
T Singh-I
No Correlation
0.32
1 player
I Latin
2 player
L Bruce
Weak Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
I Latin
2 player
S Bodha
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
I Latin
2 player
M Nayak
No Correlation
0.55
1 player
I Latin
2 player
M Whelan
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
I Latin
2 player
I Latin
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick L Burns and L Bruce together
Positive Correlation

Pick L Burns and M Nayak together
Positive Correlation

Pick A Hillman and S Bodha together
Strong Positive Correlation

Pick A Hillman and M Nayak together
Positive Correlation

Pick K Nestor and S Bodha together
Positive Correlation

High Performing Players

1 L Burns

AR
Similar Perfomance
M Nayak 0.77
L Bruce 0.77
T Singh-I 0.42
A Hillman 0.38
C Packard 0.35
S Bodha 0.2
I Latin 0.1
K Nestor 0.03
Opposite Perfomance
M Whelan -0.55

2 C Packard

BAT
Similar Perfomance
M Whelan 0.55
L Burns 0.35
M Nayak 0.3
I Latin 0.28
L Bruce 0.25
K Nestor 0.23
S Bodha 0.2
A Hillman 0.18
Opposite Perfomance
T Singh-I -0.08

3 L Bruce

AR
Similar Perfomance
L Burns 0.77
M Nayak 0.52
A Hillman 0.45
T Singh-I 0.38
I Latin 0.32
S Bodha 0.28
C Packard 0.25
Opposite Perfomance
M Whelan -0.35

4 M Nayak

AR
Similar Perfomance
L Burns 0.77
A Hillman 0.6
L Bruce 0.52
T Singh-I 0.5
S Bodha 0.42
K Nestor 0.33
C Packard 0.3
Opposite Perfomance
M Whelan -0.4

5 T Singh-I

BAT
Similar Perfomance
M Nayak 0.5
L Burns 0.42
A Hillman 0.42
L Bruce 0.38
S Bodha 0.28
K Nestor 0.23
Opposite Perfomance
M Whelan -0.55
I Latin -0.15
C Packard -0.08

Best RMC Player Combinations

Best RMC Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
Z Ali AR RMC
A Naththandige BOW RMC
C Fernando AR RMC
M Kanageshwaram AR RMC
B Khan BOW RMC
S Rillagodage WK RMC
D Marage BAT RMC
C Kalugamage BOW RMC
D Seneviratne BAT RMC
M Siriwardana AR RMC
P Samarage AR RMC
Z Ali
A Naththandige
C Fernando
M Kanageshwaram
B Khan
S Rillagodage
D Marage
C Kalugamage
D Seneviratne
M Siriwardana
P Samarage
1
1 player
Z Ali
2 player
Z Ali
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
Z Ali
2 player
A Naththandige
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
Z Ali
2 player
C Fernando
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.27
1 player
Z Ali
2 player
M Kanageshwaram
Weak Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
Z Ali
2 player
B Khan
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
Z Ali
2 player
S Rillagodage
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
Z Ali
2 player
D Marage
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
Z Ali
2 player
C Kalugamage
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
Z Ali
2 player
D Seneviratne
No Correlation
0.47
1 player
Z Ali
2 player
M Siriwardana
Positive Correlation
-0.07
1 player
Z Ali
2 player
P Samarage
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Naththandige
2 player
Z Ali
No Correlation
1
1 player
A Naththandige
2 player
A Naththandige
Strong Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
A Naththandige
2 player
C Fernando
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.38
1 player
A Naththandige
2 player
M Kanageshwaram
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
A Naththandige
2 player
B Khan
No Correlation
-0.5
1 player
A Naththandige
2 player
S Rillagodage
Negative Correlation
-0.05
1 player
A Naththandige
2 player
D Marage
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
A Naththandige
2 player
C Kalugamage
Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
A Naththandige
2 player
D Seneviratne
No Correlation
-0.17
1 player
A Naththandige
2 player
M Siriwardana
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
A Naththandige
2 player
P Samarage
Weak Negative Correlation
0.2
1 player
C Fernando
2 player
Z Ali
Weak Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
C Fernando
2 player
A Naththandige
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
C Fernando
2 player
C Fernando
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.53
1 player
C Fernando
2 player
M Kanageshwaram
Negative Correlation
0.16
1 player
C Fernando
2 player
B Khan
No Correlation
-0.21
1 player
C Fernando
2 player
S Rillagodage
Weak Negative Correlation
0.3
1 player
C Fernando
2 player
D Marage
Weak Positive Correlation
0.6
1 player
C Fernando
2 player
C Kalugamage
Positive Correlation
-0.67
1 player
C Fernando
2 player
D Seneviratne
Negative Correlation
0.2
1 player
C Fernando
2 player
M Siriwardana
Weak Positive Correlation
0.29
1 player
C Fernando
2 player
P Samarage
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.27
1 player
M Kanageshwaram
2 player
Z Ali
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.38
1 player
M Kanageshwaram
2 player
A Naththandige
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.53
1 player
M Kanageshwaram
2 player
C Fernando
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
M Kanageshwaram
2 player
M Kanageshwaram
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.56
1 player
M Kanageshwaram
2 player
B Khan
Negative Correlation
-0.06
1 player
M Kanageshwaram
2 player
S Rillagodage
No Correlation
-0.38
1 player
M Kanageshwaram
2 player
D Marage
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.45
1 player
M Kanageshwaram
2 player
C Kalugamage
Negative Correlation
0.67
1 player
M Kanageshwaram
2 player
D Seneviratne
Positive Correlation
-0.27
1 player
M Kanageshwaram
2 player
M Siriwardana
Weak Negative Correlation
0.06
1 player
M Kanageshwaram
2 player
P Samarage
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
B Khan
2 player
Z Ali
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
B Khan
2 player
A Naththandige
No Correlation
0.16
1 player
B Khan
2 player
C Fernando
No Correlation
-0.56
1 player
B Khan
2 player
M Kanageshwaram
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
B Khan
2 player
B Khan
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
B Khan
2 player
S Rillagodage
No Correlation
0.43
1 player
B Khan
2 player
D Marage
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
B Khan
2 player
C Kalugamage
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
B Khan
2 player
D Seneviratne
No Correlation
0.17
1 player
B Khan
2 player
M Siriwardana
No Correlation
-0.1
1 player
B Khan
2 player
P Samarage
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
S Rillagodage
2 player
Z Ali
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.5
1 player
S Rillagodage
2 player
A Naththandige
Negative Correlation
-0.21
1 player
S Rillagodage
2 player
C Fernando
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.06
1 player
S Rillagodage
2 player
M Kanageshwaram
No Correlation
0
1 player
S Rillagodage
2 player
B Khan
No Correlation
1
1 player
S Rillagodage
2 player
S Rillagodage
Strong Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
S Rillagodage
2 player
D Marage
No Correlation
-0.2
1 player
S Rillagodage
2 player
C Kalugamage
No Correlation
-0.29
1 player
S Rillagodage
2 player
D Seneviratne
Weak Negative Correlation
0.47
1 player
S Rillagodage
2 player
M Siriwardana
Positive Correlation
-0.07
1 player
S Rillagodage
2 player
P Samarage
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
D Marage
2 player
Z Ali
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.05
1 player
D Marage
2 player
A Naththandige
No Correlation
0.3
1 player
D Marage
2 player
C Fernando
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.38
1 player
D Marage
2 player
M Kanageshwaram
Weak Negative Correlation
0.43
1 player
D Marage
2 player
B Khan
Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
D Marage
2 player
S Rillagodage
No Correlation
1
1 player
D Marage
2 player
D Marage
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
D Marage
2 player
C Kalugamage
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.69
1 player
D Marage
2 player
D Seneviratne
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
D Marage
2 player
M Siriwardana
No Correlation
0.18
1 player
D Marage
2 player
P Samarage
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
C Kalugamage
2 player
Z Ali
Weak Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
C Kalugamage
2 player
A Naththandige
Positive Correlation
0.6
1 player
C Kalugamage
2 player
C Fernando
Positive Correlation
-0.45
1 player
C Kalugamage
2 player
M Kanageshwaram
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
C Kalugamage
2 player
B Khan
No Correlation
-0.2
1 player
C Kalugamage
2 player
S Rillagodage
No Correlation
-0.25
1 player
C Kalugamage
2 player
D Marage
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
C Kalugamage
2 player
C Kalugamage
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
C Kalugamage
2 player
D Seneviratne
No Correlation
0.07
1 player
C Kalugamage
2 player
M Siriwardana
No Correlation
-0.2
1 player
C Kalugamage
2 player
P Samarage
No Correlation
0
1 player
D Seneviratne
2 player
Z Ali
No Correlation
0.09
1 player
D Seneviratne
2 player
A Naththandige
No Correlation
-0.67
1 player
D Seneviratne
2 player
C Fernando
Negative Correlation
0.67
1 player
D Seneviratne
2 player
M Kanageshwaram
Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
D Seneviratne
2 player
B Khan
No Correlation
-0.29
1 player
D Seneviratne
2 player
S Rillagodage
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.69
1 player
D Seneviratne
2 player
D Marage
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
D Seneviratne
2 player
C Kalugamage
No Correlation
1
1 player
D Seneviratne
2 player
D Seneviratne
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
D Seneviratne
2 player
M Siriwardana
No Correlation
-0.57
1 player
D Seneviratne
2 player
P Samarage
Negative Correlation
0.47
1 player
M Siriwardana
2 player
Z Ali
Positive Correlation
-0.17
1 player
M Siriwardana
2 player
A Naththandige
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
M Siriwardana
2 player
C Fernando
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.27
1 player
M Siriwardana
2 player
M Kanageshwaram
Weak Negative Correlation
0.17
1 player
M Siriwardana
2 player
B Khan
No Correlation
0.47
1 player
M Siriwardana
2 player
S Rillagodage
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
M Siriwardana
2 player
D Marage
No Correlation
0.07
1 player
M Siriwardana
2 player
C Kalugamage
No Correlation
0
1 player
M Siriwardana
2 player
D Seneviratne
No Correlation
1
1 player
M Siriwardana
2 player
M Siriwardana
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.07
1 player
M Siriwardana
2 player
P Samarage
No Correlation
-0.07
1 player
P Samarage
2 player
Z Ali
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
P Samarage
2 player
A Naththandige
Weak Negative Correlation
0.29
1 player
P Samarage
2 player
C Fernando
Weak Positive Correlation
0.06
1 player
P Samarage
2 player
M Kanageshwaram
No Correlation
-0.1
1 player
P Samarage
2 player
B Khan
No Correlation
-0.07
1 player
P Samarage
2 player
S Rillagodage
No Correlation
0.18
1 player
P Samarage
2 player
D Marage
No Correlation
-0.2
1 player
P Samarage
2 player
C Kalugamage
No Correlation
-0.57
1 player
P Samarage
2 player
D Seneviratne
Negative Correlation
-0.07
1 player
P Samarage
2 player
M Siriwardana
No Correlation
1
1 player
P Samarage
2 player
P Samarage
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick C Fernando and C Kalugamage together
Positive Correlation

Pick M Kanageshwaram and D Seneviratne together
Positive Correlation

Pick C Fernando and D Seneviratne together
Negative Correlation

Pick D Marage and D Seneviratne together
Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 C Fernando

AR
Similar Perfomance
C Kalugamage 0.6
A Naththandige 0.36
D Marage 0.3
P Samarage 0.29
Z Ali 0.2
M Siriwardana 0.2
B Khan 0.16
Opposite Perfomance
D Seneviratne -0.67
M Kanageshwaram -0.53
S Rillagodage -0.21

2 P Samarage

AR
Similar Perfomance
C Fernando 0.29
D Marage 0.18
M Kanageshwaram 0.06
Opposite Perfomance
D Seneviratne -0.57
A Naththandige -0.33
C Kalugamage -0.2
B Khan -0.1
Z Ali -0.07
S Rillagodage -0.07
M Siriwardana -0.07

3 D Marage

BAT
Similar Perfomance
B Khan 0.43
C Fernando 0.3
Z Ali 0.25
P Samarage 0.18
S Rillagodage 0.09
Opposite Perfomance
D Seneviratne -0.69
M Kanageshwaram -0.38
C Kalugamage -0.25
A Naththandige -0.05

4 A Naththandige

BOW
Similar Perfomance
C Kalugamage 0.5
C Fernando 0.36
D Seneviratne 0.09
Opposite Perfomance
S Rillagodage -0.5
M Kanageshwaram -0.38
P Samarage -0.33
M Siriwardana -0.17
D Marage -0.05

5 S Rillagodage

WK
Similar Perfomance
M Siriwardana 0.47
Z Ali 0.2
D Marage 0.09
Opposite Perfomance
A Naththandige -0.5
D Seneviratne -0.29
C Fernando -0.21
C Kalugamage -0.2
P Samarage -0.07
M Kanageshwaram -0.06

Best MTK Player Combinations

Best MTK Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
J Riley BOW MTK
L Burns AR MTK
A Hillman WK MTK
C Packard BAT MTK
K Nestor BAT MTK
T Singh-I BAT MTK
L Bruce AR MTK
S Bodha BOW MTK
M Nayak AR MTK
M Whelan BOW MTK
I Latin AR MTK
J Riley
L Burns
A Hillman
C Packard
K Nestor
T Singh-I
L Bruce
S Bodha
M Nayak
M Whelan
I Latin
1
1 player
J Riley
2 player
J Riley
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
J Riley
2 player
L Burns
No Correlation
0
1 player
J Riley
2 player
A Hillman
No Correlation
0
1 player
J Riley
2 player
C Packard
No Correlation
0
1 player
J Riley
2 player
K Nestor
No Correlation
0
1 player
J Riley
2 player
T Singh-I
No Correlation
0
1 player
J Riley
2 player
L Bruce
No Correlation
0
1 player
J Riley
2 player
S Bodha
No Correlation
0
1 player
J Riley
2 player
M Nayak
No Correlation
0
1 player
J Riley
2 player
M Whelan
No Correlation
0
1 player
J Riley
2 player
I Latin
No Correlation
0
1 player
L Burns
2 player
J Riley
No Correlation
1
1 player
L Burns
2 player
L Burns
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
L Burns
2 player
A Hillman
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
L Burns
2 player
C Packard
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
L Burns
2 player
K Nestor
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
L Burns
2 player
T Singh-I
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
L Burns
2 player
L Bruce
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
L Burns
2 player
S Bodha
Weak Negative Correlation
0.35
1 player
L Burns
2 player
M Nayak
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
L Burns
2 player
M Whelan
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
L Burns
2 player
I Latin
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Hillman
2 player
J Riley
No Correlation
-0.35
1 player
A Hillman
2 player
L Burns
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
A Hillman
2 player
A Hillman
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
A Hillman
2 player
C Packard
Weak Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
A Hillman
2 player
K Nestor
Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
A Hillman
2 player
T Singh-I
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
A Hillman
2 player
L Bruce
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
A Hillman
2 player
S Bodha
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
A Hillman
2 player
M Nayak
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
A Hillman
2 player
M Whelan
Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
A Hillman
2 player
I Latin
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
C Packard
2 player
J Riley
No Correlation
0
1 player
C Packard
2 player
L Burns
No Correlation
-0.35
1 player
C Packard
2 player
A Hillman
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
C Packard
2 player
C Packard
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
C Packard
2 player
K Nestor
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
C Packard
2 player
T Singh-I
Negative Correlation
-0.35
1 player
C Packard
2 player
L Bruce
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.35
1 player
C Packard
2 player
S Bodha
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.35
1 player
C Packard
2 player
M Nayak
Weak Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
C Packard
2 player
M Whelan
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
C Packard
2 player
I Latin
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
K Nestor
2 player
J Riley
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
K Nestor
2 player
L Burns
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
K Nestor
2 player
A Hillman
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
K Nestor
2 player
C Packard
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
K Nestor
2 player
K Nestor
Strong Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
K Nestor
2 player
T Singh-I
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
K Nestor
2 player
L Bruce
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
K Nestor
2 player
S Bodha
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
K Nestor
2 player
M Nayak
No Correlation
0
1 player
K Nestor
2 player
M Whelan
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
K Nestor
2 player
I Latin
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
T Singh-I
2 player
J Riley
No Correlation
0
1 player
T Singh-I
2 player
L Burns
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
T Singh-I
2 player
A Hillman
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
T Singh-I
2 player
C Packard
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
T Singh-I
2 player
K Nestor
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
T Singh-I
2 player
T Singh-I
Strong Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
T Singh-I
2 player
L Bruce
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
T Singh-I
2 player
S Bodha
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
T Singh-I
2 player
M Nayak
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
T Singh-I
2 player
M Whelan
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
T Singh-I
2 player
I Latin
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
L Bruce
2 player
J Riley
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
L Bruce
2 player
L Burns
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
L Bruce
2 player
A Hillman
No Correlation
-0.35
1 player
L Bruce
2 player
C Packard
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
L Bruce
2 player
K Nestor
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
L Bruce
2 player
T Singh-I
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
L Bruce
2 player
L Bruce
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
L Bruce
2 player
S Bodha
No Correlation
0
1 player
L Bruce
2 player
M Nayak
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
L Bruce
2 player
M Whelan
Negative Correlation
-0.35
1 player
L Bruce
2 player
I Latin
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
S Bodha
2 player
J Riley
No Correlation
-0.35
1 player
S Bodha
2 player
L Burns
Weak Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
S Bodha
2 player
A Hillman
Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
S Bodha
2 player
C Packard
Weak Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
S Bodha
2 player
K Nestor
Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
S Bodha
2 player
T Singh-I
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
S Bodha
2 player
L Bruce
No Correlation
1
1 player
S Bodha
2 player
S Bodha
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
S Bodha
2 player
M Nayak
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
S Bodha
2 player
M Whelan
Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
S Bodha
2 player
I Latin
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
M Nayak
2 player
J Riley
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
M Nayak
2 player
L Burns
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
M Nayak
2 player
A Hillman
No Correlation
-0.35
1 player
M Nayak
2 player
C Packard
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
M Nayak
2 player
K Nestor
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
M Nayak
2 player
T Singh-I
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
M Nayak
2 player
L Bruce
No Correlation
0
1 player
M Nayak
2 player
S Bodha
No Correlation
1
1 player
M Nayak
2 player
M Nayak
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
M Nayak
2 player
M Whelan
Negative Correlation
-0.35
1 player
M Nayak
2 player
I Latin
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
M Whelan
2 player
J Riley
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
M Whelan
2 player
L Burns
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Whelan
2 player
A Hillman
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Whelan
2 player
C Packard
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
M Whelan
2 player
K Nestor
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
M Whelan
2 player
T Singh-I
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
M Whelan
2 player
L Bruce
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Whelan
2 player
S Bodha
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
M Whelan
2 player
M Nayak
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
M Whelan
2 player
M Whelan
Strong Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Whelan
2 player
I Latin
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
I Latin
2 player
J Riley
No Correlation
0
1 player
I Latin
2 player
L Burns
No Correlation
-0.35
1 player
I Latin
2 player
A Hillman
Weak Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
I Latin
2 player
C Packard
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
I Latin
2 player
K Nestor
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
I Latin
2 player
T Singh-I
Negative Correlation
-0.35
1 player
I Latin
2 player
L Bruce
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.35
1 player
I Latin
2 player
S Bodha
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.35
1 player
I Latin
2 player
M Nayak
Weak Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
I Latin
2 player
M Whelan
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
I Latin
2 player
I Latin
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick A Hillman and K Nestor together
Positive Correlation

Pick A Hillman and M Whelan together
Positive Correlation

Pick C Packard and M Whelan together
Positive Correlation

Pick C Packard and I Latin together
Positive Correlation

Pick K Nestor and T Singh-I together
Positive Correlation

Pick S Bodha and M Whelan together
Positive Correlation

Pick M Whelan and I Latin together
Positive Correlation

Pick L Burns and K Nestor together
Negative Correlation

Pick L Burns and M Whelan together
Negative Correlation

Pick C Packard and K Nestor together
Negative Correlation

Pick C Packard and T Singh-I together
Negative Correlation

Pick K Nestor and I Latin together
Negative Correlation

Pick T Singh-I and M Whelan together
Negative Correlation

Pick T Singh-I and I Latin together
Negative Correlation

Pick L Bruce and M Whelan together
Negative Correlation

Pick M Nayak and M Whelan together
Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 L Burns

AR
Similar Perfomance
L Bruce 0.35
M Nayak 0.35
Opposite Perfomance
K Nestor -0.7
M Whelan -0.7
A Hillman -0.35
S Bodha -0.35

2 L Bruce

AR
Similar Perfomance
L Burns 0.35
T Singh-I 0.35
Opposite Perfomance
M Whelan -0.7
C Packard -0.35
I Latin -0.35

3 M Nayak

AR
Similar Perfomance
L Burns 0.35
T Singh-I 0.35
Opposite Perfomance
M Whelan -0.7
C Packard -0.35
I Latin -0.35

4 C Packard

BAT
Similar Perfomance
M Whelan 0.7
I Latin 0.7
Opposite Perfomance
K Nestor -0.7
T Singh-I -0.7
A Hillman -0.35
L Bruce -0.35
S Bodha -0.35
M Nayak -0.35

5 I Latin

AR
Similar Perfomance
C Packard 0.7
M Whelan 0.7
Opposite Perfomance
K Nestor -0.7
T Singh-I -0.7
A Hillman -0.35
L Bruce -0.35
S Bodha -0.35
M Nayak -0.35

More on PL Labs

RMC vs MTK

PerfectLineup © 2025. All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer - PerfectLineup is an educational tool providing detailed analysis of sports players based on their past performances. We are not associated with any gaming activity and do not host any kind of paid or free contests or pool games. Our focus is purely on data-driven solutions to enhance our users' knowledge.

Perfect Lineup is not affiliated in any way to and claims no association, in any capacity whatsoever, with the Residents of the states of SIKKIM, ASSAM, ODISHA, TELANGANA, NAGALAND, ANDHRA PRADESH and where otherwise prohibited by law are not eligible to access Perfect Lineup.

This platform is applicable for users 18+ Only