SPE 27 May 06:17 pm WIM

Lineup Out

Raynes Park Sports Ground
ECS England T10

Best Player Combinations For
SPE vs WIM

How it Works?

This guide is super useful for identifying player combinations that are likely to score big. Use the filters to identify the best player combinations according to specific match scenarios.

Player correlate positively

Both players generally perform similarly when picked together. They either score high together or score low together. Maximise FPts by picking players that correlate positively with top players.

Player correlate negatively

Both players generally perform in an opposite manner. If one player scores high, the other usually scores low. Avoid picking players that correlate negatively with top player

Show Player Combinations on the basis of:

Best SPE Player Combinations

Best SPE Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad
H Stothard BOW SPE
M Evans BOW SPE
D Adams BOW SPE
C Ponsonby BOW SPE
G Grant BOW SPE
R Barker AR SPE
D Mansfield BAT SPE
WD Cani BAT SPE
A Macpherson WK SPE
T Johnson BAT SPE
T Barker BAT SPE
H Stothard
M Evans
D Adams
C Ponsonby
G Grant
R Barker
D Mansfield
WD Cani
A Macpherson
T Johnson
T Barker
1
1 player
H Stothard
2 player
H Stothard
Strong Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
H Stothard
2 player
M Evans
Positive Correlation
0.52
1 player
H Stothard
2 player
D Adams
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
H Stothard
2 player
C Ponsonby
Strong Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
H Stothard
2 player
G Grant
Positive Correlation
0.85
1 player
H Stothard
2 player
R Barker
Strong Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
H Stothard
2 player
D Mansfield
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
H Stothard
2 player
WD Cani
Weak Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
H Stothard
2 player
A Macpherson
Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
H Stothard
2 player
T Johnson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
H Stothard
2 player
T Barker
Weak Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
M Evans
2 player
H Stothard
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M Evans
2 player
M Evans
Strong Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
M Evans
2 player
D Adams
Weak Positive Correlation
0.6
1 player
M Evans
2 player
C Ponsonby
Positive Correlation
0.75
1 player
M Evans
2 player
G Grant
Positive Correlation
0.8
1 player
M Evans
2 player
R Barker
Strong Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
M Evans
2 player
D Mansfield
Weak Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
M Evans
2 player
WD Cani
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Evans
2 player
A Macpherson
Positive Correlation
-0.18
1 player
M Evans
2 player
T Johnson
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
M Evans
2 player
T Barker
Positive Correlation
0.52
1 player
D Adams
2 player
H Stothard
Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
D Adams
2 player
M Evans
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
D Adams
2 player
D Adams
Strong Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
D Adams
2 player
C Ponsonby
Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
D Adams
2 player
G Grant
Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
D Adams
2 player
R Barker
Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
D Adams
2 player
D Mansfield
No Correlation
0.62
1 player
D Adams
2 player
WD Cani
Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
D Adams
2 player
A Macpherson
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
D Adams
2 player
T Johnson
Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
D Adams
2 player
T Barker
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
C Ponsonby
2 player
H Stothard
Strong Positive Correlation
0.6
1 player
C Ponsonby
2 player
M Evans
Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
C Ponsonby
2 player
D Adams
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
C Ponsonby
2 player
C Ponsonby
Strong Positive Correlation
0.85
1 player
C Ponsonby
2 player
G Grant
Strong Positive Correlation
0.8
1 player
C Ponsonby
2 player
R Barker
Strong Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
C Ponsonby
2 player
D Mansfield
No Correlation
0.1
1 player
C Ponsonby
2 player
WD Cani
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
C Ponsonby
2 player
A Macpherson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
C Ponsonby
2 player
T Johnson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
C Ponsonby
2 player
T Barker
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
G Grant
2 player
H Stothard
Positive Correlation
0.75
1 player
G Grant
2 player
M Evans
Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
G Grant
2 player
D Adams
Positive Correlation
0.85
1 player
G Grant
2 player
C Ponsonby
Strong Positive Correlation
1
1 player
G Grant
2 player
G Grant
Strong Positive Correlation
1
1 player
G Grant
2 player
R Barker
Strong Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
G Grant
2 player
D Mansfield
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.13
1 player
G Grant
2 player
WD Cani
No Correlation
0.77
1 player
G Grant
2 player
A Macpherson
Positive Correlation
0.03
1 player
G Grant
2 player
T Johnson
No Correlation
0.44
1 player
G Grant
2 player
T Barker
Positive Correlation
0.85
1 player
R Barker
2 player
H Stothard
Strong Positive Correlation
0.8
1 player
R Barker
2 player
M Evans
Strong Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
R Barker
2 player
D Adams
Positive Correlation
0.8
1 player
R Barker
2 player
C Ponsonby
Strong Positive Correlation
1
1 player
R Barker
2 player
G Grant
Strong Positive Correlation
1
1 player
R Barker
2 player
R Barker
Strong Positive Correlation
0.37
1 player
R Barker
2 player
D Mansfield
Weak Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
R Barker
2 player
WD Cani
No Correlation
0.6
1 player
R Barker
2 player
A Macpherson
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
R Barker
2 player
T Johnson
No Correlation
0.37
1 player
R Barker
2 player
T Barker
Weak Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
D Mansfield
2 player
H Stothard
Weak Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
D Mansfield
2 player
M Evans
Weak Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
D Mansfield
2 player
D Adams
No Correlation
0.13
1 player
D Mansfield
2 player
C Ponsonby
No Correlation
0.26
1 player
D Mansfield
2 player
G Grant
Weak Positive Correlation
0.37
1 player
D Mansfield
2 player
R Barker
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
D Mansfield
2 player
D Mansfield
Strong Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
D Mansfield
2 player
WD Cani
No Correlation
0.54
1 player
D Mansfield
2 player
A Macpherson
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
D Mansfield
2 player
T Johnson
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
D Mansfield
2 player
T Barker
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
WD Cani
2 player
H Stothard
Weak Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
WD Cani
2 player
M Evans
No Correlation
0.62
1 player
WD Cani
2 player
D Adams
Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
WD Cani
2 player
C Ponsonby
No Correlation
-0.13
1 player
WD Cani
2 player
G Grant
No Correlation
0.13
1 player
WD Cani
2 player
R Barker
No Correlation
0.18
1 player
WD Cani
2 player
D Mansfield
No Correlation
1
1 player
WD Cani
2 player
WD Cani
Strong Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
WD Cani
2 player
A Macpherson
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
WD Cani
2 player
T Johnson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
WD Cani
2 player
T Barker
Weak Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
A Macpherson
2 player
H Stothard
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
A Macpherson
2 player
M Evans
Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
A Macpherson
2 player
D Adams
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
A Macpherson
2 player
C Ponsonby
Weak Positive Correlation
0.77
1 player
A Macpherson
2 player
G Grant
Positive Correlation
0.6
1 player
A Macpherson
2 player
R Barker
Positive Correlation
0.54
1 player
A Macpherson
2 player
D Mansfield
Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
A Macpherson
2 player
WD Cani
No Correlation
1
1 player
A Macpherson
2 player
A Macpherson
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.47
1 player
A Macpherson
2 player
T Johnson
Negative Correlation
0.76
1 player
A Macpherson
2 player
T Barker
Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
T Johnson
2 player
H Stothard
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.18
1 player
T Johnson
2 player
M Evans
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
T Johnson
2 player
D Adams
Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
T Johnson
2 player
C Ponsonby
Weak Positive Correlation
0.03
1 player
T Johnson
2 player
G Grant
No Correlation
0
1 player
T Johnson
2 player
R Barker
No Correlation
0
1 player
T Johnson
2 player
D Mansfield
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
T Johnson
2 player
WD Cani
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.47
1 player
T Johnson
2 player
A Macpherson
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
T Johnson
2 player
T Johnson
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.43
1 player
T Johnson
2 player
T Barker
Negative Correlation
0.35
1 player
T Barker
2 player
H Stothard
Weak Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
T Barker
2 player
M Evans
Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
T Barker
2 player
D Adams
Weak Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
T Barker
2 player
C Ponsonby
No Correlation
0.44
1 player
T Barker
2 player
G Grant
Positive Correlation
0.37
1 player
T Barker
2 player
R Barker
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
T Barker
2 player
D Mansfield
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
T Barker
2 player
WD Cani
Weak Positive Correlation
0.76
1 player
T Barker
2 player
A Macpherson
Positive Correlation
-0.43
1 player
T Barker
2 player
T Johnson
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
T Barker
2 player
T Barker
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick H Stothard and C Ponsonby together
Strong Positive Correlation

Pick H Stothard and R Barker together
Strong Positive Correlation

Pick M Evans and C Ponsonby together
Positive Correlation

Pick M Evans and G Grant together
Positive Correlation

Pick M Evans and R Barker together
Strong Positive Correlation

Pick M Evans and A Macpherson together
Positive Correlation

Pick D Adams and WD Cani together
Positive Correlation

Pick C Ponsonby and G Grant together
Strong Positive Correlation

Pick C Ponsonby and R Barker together
Strong Positive Correlation

Pick G Grant and R Barker together
Strong Positive Correlation

Pick G Grant and A Macpherson together
Positive Correlation

Pick R Barker and A Macpherson together
Positive Correlation

Pick A Macpherson and T Barker together
Positive Correlation

High Performing Players

1 T Johnson

BAT
Similar Perfomance
D Adams 0.42
WD Cani 0.35
H Stothard 0.28
C Ponsonby 0.23
G Grant 0.03
Opposite Perfomance
A Macpherson -0.47
T Barker -0.43
M Evans -0.18

2 D Mansfield

BAT
Similar Perfomance
A Macpherson 0.54
H Stothard 0.38
R Barker 0.37
M Evans 0.36
T Barker 0.28
G Grant 0.26
WD Cani 0.18
D Adams 0.15
C Ponsonby 0.13

3 D Adams

BOW
Similar Perfomance
WD Cani 0.62
H Stothard 0.52
C Ponsonby 0.5
R Barker 0.5
G Grant 0.43
T Johnson 0.42
M Evans 0.38
T Barker 0.2
A Macpherson 0.18
D Mansfield 0.15

4 WD Cani

BAT
Similar Perfomance
D Adams 0.62
H Stothard 0.35
T Johnson 0.35
T Barker 0.33
D Mansfield 0.18
R Barker 0.13
M Evans 0.1
C Ponsonby 0.1
A Macpherson 0.1
Opposite Perfomance
G Grant -0.13

5 H Stothard

BOW
Similar Perfomance
C Ponsonby 1
R Barker 0.85
D Adams 0.52
G Grant 0.5
A Macpherson 0.5
M Evans 0.42
D Mansfield 0.38
WD Cani 0.35
T Barker 0.35
T Johnson 0.28

Best WIM Player Combinations

Best WIM Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad
OL Pike BOW WIM
J Palsar BOW WIM
Whipple AR WIM
J Weir BAT WIM
N Hucker WK WIM
A Slater BAT WIM
S Reeves AR WIM
B Sewell AR WIM
K Winder AR WIM
J Boyle BAT WIM
M Boyle BAT WIM
OL Pike
J Palsar
Whipple
J Weir
N Hucker
A Slater
S Reeves
B Sewell
K Winder
J Boyle
M Boyle
1
1 player
OL Pike
2 player
OL Pike
Strong Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
OL Pike
2 player
J Palsar
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
OL Pike
2 player
Whipple
No Correlation
0.12
1 player
OL Pike
2 player
J Weir
No Correlation
0.8
1 player
OL Pike
2 player
N Hucker
Strong Positive Correlation
0.8
1 player
OL Pike
2 player
A Slater
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
OL Pike
2 player
S Reeves
Weak Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
OL Pike
2 player
B Sewell
Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
OL Pike
2 player
K Winder
Weak Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
OL Pike
2 player
J Boyle
No Correlation
0
1 player
OL Pike
2 player
M Boyle
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
J Palsar
2 player
OL Pike
No Correlation
1
1 player
J Palsar
2 player
J Palsar
Strong Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
J Palsar
2 player
Whipple
Weak Positive Correlation
0.53
1 player
J Palsar
2 player
J Weir
Positive Correlation
0.85
1 player
J Palsar
2 player
N Hucker
Strong Positive Correlation
0.85
1 player
J Palsar
2 player
A Slater
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
J Palsar
2 player
S Reeves
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
J Palsar
2 player
B Sewell
Weak Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
J Palsar
2 player
K Winder
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
J Palsar
2 player
J Boyle
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
J Palsar
2 player
M Boyle
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
Whipple
2 player
OL Pike
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
Whipple
2 player
J Palsar
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
Whipple
2 player
Whipple
Strong Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
Whipple
2 player
J Weir
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
Whipple
2 player
N Hucker
No Correlation
-0.08
1 player
Whipple
2 player
A Slater
No Correlation
0.22
1 player
Whipple
2 player
S Reeves
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
Whipple
2 player
B Sewell
Weak Positive Correlation
0.55
1 player
Whipple
2 player
K Winder
Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
Whipple
2 player
J Boyle
Weak Positive Correlation
0.19
1 player
Whipple
2 player
M Boyle
No Correlation
0.12
1 player
J Weir
2 player
OL Pike
No Correlation
0.53
1 player
J Weir
2 player
J Palsar
Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
J Weir
2 player
Whipple
No Correlation
1
1 player
J Weir
2 player
J Weir
Strong Positive Correlation
0.16
1 player
J Weir
2 player
N Hucker
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
J Weir
2 player
A Slater
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.13
1 player
J Weir
2 player
S Reeves
No Correlation
-0.27
1 player
J Weir
2 player
B Sewell
Weak Negative Correlation
0.85
1 player
J Weir
2 player
K Winder
Strong Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
J Weir
2 player
J Boyle
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.07
1 player
J Weir
2 player
M Boyle
No Correlation
0.8
1 player
N Hucker
2 player
OL Pike
Strong Positive Correlation
0.85
1 player
N Hucker
2 player
J Palsar
Strong Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
N Hucker
2 player
Whipple
No Correlation
0.16
1 player
N Hucker
2 player
J Weir
No Correlation
1
1 player
N Hucker
2 player
N Hucker
Strong Positive Correlation
0.79
1 player
N Hucker
2 player
A Slater
Positive Correlation
-0.1
1 player
N Hucker
2 player
S Reeves
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
N Hucker
2 player
B Sewell
Weak Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
N Hucker
2 player
K Winder
Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
N Hucker
2 player
J Boyle
Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
N Hucker
2 player
M Boyle
Positive Correlation
0.8
1 player
A Slater
2 player
OL Pike
Strong Positive Correlation
0.85
1 player
A Slater
2 player
J Palsar
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.08
1 player
A Slater
2 player
Whipple
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
A Slater
2 player
J Weir
Weak Positive Correlation
0.79
1 player
A Slater
2 player
N Hucker
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
A Slater
2 player
A Slater
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.19
1 player
A Slater
2 player
S Reeves
No Correlation
0.13
1 player
A Slater
2 player
B Sewell
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
A Slater
2 player
K Winder
Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
A Slater
2 player
J Boyle
No Correlation
0.09
1 player
A Slater
2 player
M Boyle
No Correlation
-0.23
1 player
S Reeves
2 player
OL Pike
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
S Reeves
2 player
J Palsar
No Correlation
0.22
1 player
S Reeves
2 player
Whipple
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.13
1 player
S Reeves
2 player
J Weir
No Correlation
-0.1
1 player
S Reeves
2 player
N Hucker
No Correlation
-0.19
1 player
S Reeves
2 player
A Slater
No Correlation
1
1 player
S Reeves
2 player
S Reeves
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.03
1 player
S Reeves
2 player
B Sewell
No Correlation
-0.35
1 player
S Reeves
2 player
K Winder
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.01
1 player
S Reeves
2 player
J Boyle
No Correlation
-0.08
1 player
S Reeves
2 player
M Boyle
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
B Sewell
2 player
OL Pike
Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
B Sewell
2 player
J Palsar
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
B Sewell
2 player
Whipple
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.27
1 player
B Sewell
2 player
J Weir
Weak Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
B Sewell
2 player
N Hucker
Weak Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
B Sewell
2 player
A Slater
No Correlation
-0.03
1 player
B Sewell
2 player
S Reeves
No Correlation
1
1 player
B Sewell
2 player
B Sewell
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.15
1 player
B Sewell
2 player
K Winder
No Correlation
-0.22
1 player
B Sewell
2 player
J Boyle
Weak Negative Correlation
0.31
1 player
B Sewell
2 player
M Boyle
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
K Winder
2 player
OL Pike
Weak Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
K Winder
2 player
J Palsar
Positive Correlation
0.55
1 player
K Winder
2 player
Whipple
Positive Correlation
0.85
1 player
K Winder
2 player
J Weir
Strong Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
K Winder
2 player
N Hucker
Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
K Winder
2 player
A Slater
Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
K Winder
2 player
S Reeves
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.15
1 player
K Winder
2 player
B Sewell
No Correlation
1
1 player
K Winder
2 player
K Winder
Strong Positive Correlation
1
1 player
K Winder
2 player
J Boyle
Strong Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
K Winder
2 player
M Boyle
Weak Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
J Boyle
2 player
OL Pike
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
J Boyle
2 player
J Palsar
Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
J Boyle
2 player
Whipple
Weak Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
J Boyle
2 player
J Weir
Weak Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
J Boyle
2 player
N Hucker
Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
J Boyle
2 player
A Slater
No Correlation
-0.01
1 player
J Boyle
2 player
S Reeves
No Correlation
-0.22
1 player
J Boyle
2 player
B Sewell
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
J Boyle
2 player
K Winder
Strong Positive Correlation
1
1 player
J Boyle
2 player
J Boyle
Strong Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
J Boyle
2 player
M Boyle
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
M Boyle
2 player
OL Pike
No Correlation
0
1 player
M Boyle
2 player
J Palsar
No Correlation
0.19
1 player
M Boyle
2 player
Whipple
No Correlation
-0.07
1 player
M Boyle
2 player
J Weir
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
M Boyle
2 player
N Hucker
Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
M Boyle
2 player
A Slater
No Correlation
-0.08
1 player
M Boyle
2 player
S Reeves
No Correlation
0.31
1 player
M Boyle
2 player
B Sewell
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
M Boyle
2 player
K Winder
Weak Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
M Boyle
2 player
J Boyle
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M Boyle
2 player
M Boyle
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick OL Pike and N Hucker together
Strong Positive Correlation

Pick OL Pike and A Slater together
Strong Positive Correlation

Pick OL Pike and B Sewell together
Positive Correlation

Pick J Palsar and N Hucker together
Strong Positive Correlation

Pick J Palsar and A Slater together
Strong Positive Correlation

Pick J Palsar and K Winder together
Positive Correlation

Pick J Palsar and J Boyle together
Positive Correlation

Pick J Weir and K Winder together
Strong Positive Correlation

Pick N Hucker and A Slater together
Positive Correlation

Pick K Winder and J Boyle together
Strong Positive Correlation

High Performing Players

1 Whipple

AR
Similar Perfomance
K Winder 0.55
J Palsar 0.25
B Sewell 0.23
S Reeves 0.22
J Boyle 0.2
M Boyle 0.19
OL Pike 0.14
J Weir 0.12
N Hucker 0.11
Opposite Perfomance
A Slater -0.08

2 S Reeves

AR
Similar Perfomance
Whipple 0.22
Opposite Perfomance
K Winder -0.35
OL Pike -0.23
A Slater -0.19
J Weir -0.13
N Hucker -0.1
M Boyle -0.08
B Sewell -0.03
J Boyle -0.01

3 M Boyle

BAT
Similar Perfomance
N Hucker 0.5
K Winder 0.35
J Boyle 0.34
B Sewell 0.31
Whipple 0.19
A Slater 0.09
Opposite Perfomance
S Reeves -0.08
J Weir -0.07

4 J Weir

BAT
Similar Perfomance
K Winder 0.85
J Palsar 0.53
A Slater 0.33
J Boyle 0.3
N Hucker 0.16
OL Pike 0.12
Whipple 0.12
Opposite Perfomance
B Sewell -0.27
S Reeves -0.13
M Boyle -0.07

5 B Sewell

AR
Similar Perfomance
OL Pike 0.7
N Hucker 0.33
M Boyle 0.31
Whipple 0.23
J Palsar 0.2
A Slater 0.13
Opposite Perfomance
J Weir -0.27
J Boyle -0.22
K Winder -0.15
S Reeves -0.03

Best SPE Player Combinations

Best SPE Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad
H Stothard BOW SPE
M Evans BOW SPE
D Adams BOW SPE
C Ponsonby BOW SPE
G Grant BOW SPE
R Barker AR SPE
D Mansfield BAT SPE
WD Cani BAT SPE
A Macpherson WK SPE
T Johnson BAT SPE
T Barker BAT SPE
H Stothard
M Evans
D Adams
C Ponsonby
G Grant
R Barker
D Mansfield
WD Cani
A Macpherson
T Johnson
T Barker
1
1 player
H Stothard
2 player
H Stothard
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
H Stothard
2 player
M Evans
Weak Negative Correlation
0.35
1 player
H Stothard
2 player
D Adams
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
H Stothard
2 player
C Ponsonby
No Correlation
0
1 player
H Stothard
2 player
G Grant
No Correlation
0
1 player
H Stothard
2 player
R Barker
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
H Stothard
2 player
D Mansfield
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
H Stothard
2 player
WD Cani
No Correlation
0
1 player
H Stothard
2 player
A Macpherson
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
H Stothard
2 player
T Johnson
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
H Stothard
2 player
T Barker
Negative Correlation
-0.35
1 player
M Evans
2 player
H Stothard
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
M Evans
2 player
M Evans
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.5
1 player
M Evans
2 player
D Adams
Negative Correlation
0.23
1 player
M Evans
2 player
C Ponsonby
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
M Evans
2 player
G Grant
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
M Evans
2 player
R Barker
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
M Evans
2 player
D Mansfield
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.35
1 player
M Evans
2 player
WD Cani
Weak Negative Correlation
0.35
1 player
M Evans
2 player
A Macpherson
Weak Positive Correlation
-1
1 player
M Evans
2 player
T Johnson
Strong Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
M Evans
2 player
T Barker
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
D Adams
2 player
H Stothard
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.5
1 player
D Adams
2 player
M Evans
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
D Adams
2 player
D Adams
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
D Adams
2 player
C Ponsonby
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
D Adams
2 player
G Grant
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
D Adams
2 player
R Barker
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.25
1 player
D Adams
2 player
D Mansfield
Weak Negative Correlation
0.35
1 player
D Adams
2 player
WD Cani
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
D Adams
2 player
A Macpherson
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
D Adams
2 player
T Johnson
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
D Adams
2 player
T Barker
No Correlation
0
1 player
C Ponsonby
2 player
H Stothard
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
C Ponsonby
2 player
M Evans
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
C Ponsonby
2 player
D Adams
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
C Ponsonby
2 player
C Ponsonby
Strong Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
C Ponsonby
2 player
G Grant
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
C Ponsonby
2 player
R Barker
Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
C Ponsonby
2 player
D Mansfield
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
C Ponsonby
2 player
WD Cani
Negative Correlation
0.23
1 player
C Ponsonby
2 player
A Macpherson
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
C Ponsonby
2 player
T Johnson
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
C Ponsonby
2 player
T Barker
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
G Grant
2 player
H Stothard
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
G Grant
2 player
M Evans
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
G Grant
2 player
D Adams
Weak Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
G Grant
2 player
C Ponsonby
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
G Grant
2 player
G Grant
Strong Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
G Grant
2 player
R Barker
Positive Correlation
-0.43
1 player
G Grant
2 player
D Mansfield
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
G Grant
2 player
WD Cani
Negative Correlation
0.35
1 player
G Grant
2 player
A Macpherson
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
G Grant
2 player
T Johnson
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
G Grant
2 player
T Barker
No Correlation
0
1 player
R Barker
2 player
H Stothard
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
R Barker
2 player
M Evans
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
R Barker
2 player
D Adams
Weak Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
R Barker
2 player
C Ponsonby
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
R Barker
2 player
G Grant
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
R Barker
2 player
R Barker
Strong Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
R Barker
2 player
D Mansfield
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
R Barker
2 player
WD Cani
Negative Correlation
0.23
1 player
R Barker
2 player
A Macpherson
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
R Barker
2 player
T Johnson
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
R Barker
2 player
T Barker
Weak Negative Correlation
0.35
1 player
D Mansfield
2 player
H Stothard
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
D Mansfield
2 player
M Evans
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.25
1 player
D Mansfield
2 player
D Adams
Weak Negative Correlation
0.23
1 player
D Mansfield
2 player
C Ponsonby
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.43
1 player
D Mansfield
2 player
G Grant
Negative Correlation
0.23
1 player
D Mansfield
2 player
R Barker
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
D Mansfield
2 player
D Mansfield
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
D Mansfield
2 player
WD Cani
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
D Mansfield
2 player
A Macpherson
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
D Mansfield
2 player
T Johnson
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
D Mansfield
2 player
T Barker
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
WD Cani
2 player
H Stothard
No Correlation
-0.35
1 player
WD Cani
2 player
M Evans
Weak Negative Correlation
0.35
1 player
WD Cani
2 player
D Adams
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
WD Cani
2 player
C Ponsonby
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
WD Cani
2 player
G Grant
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
WD Cani
2 player
R Barker
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
WD Cani
2 player
D Mansfield
No Correlation
1
1 player
WD Cani
2 player
WD Cani
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
WD Cani
2 player
A Macpherson
Weak Negative Correlation
0.35
1 player
WD Cani
2 player
T Johnson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
WD Cani
2 player
T Barker
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
A Macpherson
2 player
H Stothard
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
A Macpherson
2 player
M Evans
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
A Macpherson
2 player
D Adams
Negative Correlation
0.23
1 player
A Macpherson
2 player
C Ponsonby
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
A Macpherson
2 player
G Grant
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
A Macpherson
2 player
R Barker
Weak Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
A Macpherson
2 player
D Mansfield
Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
A Macpherson
2 player
WD Cani
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
A Macpherson
2 player
A Macpherson
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
A Macpherson
2 player
T Johnson
Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
A Macpherson
2 player
T Barker
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
T Johnson
2 player
H Stothard
Weak Positive Correlation
-1
1 player
T Johnson
2 player
M Evans
Strong Negative Correlation
1
1 player
T Johnson
2 player
D Adams
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
T Johnson
2 player
C Ponsonby
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.35
1 player
T Johnson
2 player
G Grant
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
T Johnson
2 player
R Barker
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
T Johnson
2 player
D Mansfield
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
T Johnson
2 player
WD Cani
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
T Johnson
2 player
A Macpherson
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
T Johnson
2 player
T Johnson
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
T Johnson
2 player
T Barker
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
T Barker
2 player
H Stothard
Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
T Barker
2 player
M Evans
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
T Barker
2 player
D Adams
No Correlation
-0.23
1 player
T Barker
2 player
C Ponsonby
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
T Barker
2 player
G Grant
No Correlation
-0.23
1 player
T Barker
2 player
R Barker
Weak Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
T Barker
2 player
D Mansfield
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
T Barker
2 player
WD Cani
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
T Barker
2 player
A Macpherson
No Correlation
-0.23
1 player
T Barker
2 player
T Johnson
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
T Barker
2 player
T Barker
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick D Adams and T Johnson together
Strong Positive Correlation

Pick H Stothard and T Barker together
Negative Correlation

Pick M Evans and T Johnson together
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick D Adams and A Macpherson together
Negative Correlation

Pick C Ponsonby and WD Cani together
Negative Correlation

Pick G Grant and WD Cani together
Negative Correlation

Pick R Barker and WD Cani together
Negative Correlation

Pick A Macpherson and T Johnson together
Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 D Mansfield

BAT
Similar Perfomance
A Macpherson 0.42
H Stothard 0.35
T Barker 0.33
C Ponsonby 0.23
R Barker 0.23
Opposite Perfomance
G Grant -0.43
M Evans -0.25
D Adams -0.25

2 D Adams

BOW
Similar Perfomance
T Johnson 1
H Stothard 0.35
WD Cani 0.35
Opposite Perfomance
A Macpherson -0.7
M Evans -0.5
G Grant -0.33
D Mansfield -0.25
C Ponsonby -0.23
R Barker -0.23
T Barker -0.14

3 T Johnson

BAT
Similar Perfomance
D Adams 1
H Stothard 0.35
WD Cani 0.35
Opposite Perfomance
M Evans -1
A Macpherson -0.7
G Grant -0.35
C Ponsonby -0.23
R Barker -0.23
T Barker -0.23

4 WD Cani

BAT
Similar Perfomance
D Adams 0.35
T Johnson 0.35
T Barker 0.23
Opposite Perfomance
G Grant -0.7
C Ponsonby -0.7
R Barker -0.7
M Evans -0.35
A Macpherson -0.23

5 A Macpherson

WK
Similar Perfomance
D Mansfield 0.42
M Evans 0.35
G Grant 0.35
C Ponsonby 0.23
R Barker 0.23
T Barker 0.14
Opposite Perfomance
D Adams -0.7
T Johnson -0.7
WD Cani -0.23

Best WIM Player Combinations

Best WIM Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad
OL Pike BOW WIM
J Palsar BOW WIM
Whipple AR WIM
J Weir BAT WIM
N Hucker WK WIM
A Slater BAT WIM
S Reeves AR WIM
B Sewell AR WIM
K Winder AR WIM
J Boyle BAT WIM
M Boyle BAT WIM
OL Pike
J Palsar
Whipple
J Weir
N Hucker
A Slater
S Reeves
B Sewell
K Winder
J Boyle
M Boyle
1
1 player
OL Pike
2 player
OL Pike
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
OL Pike
2 player
J Palsar
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
OL Pike
2 player
Whipple
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.67
1 player
OL Pike
2 player
J Weir
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
OL Pike
2 player
N Hucker
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
OL Pike
2 player
A Slater
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
OL Pike
2 player
S Reeves
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
OL Pike
2 player
B Sewell
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
OL Pike
2 player
K Winder
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
OL Pike
2 player
J Boyle
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
OL Pike
2 player
M Boyle
No Correlation
-0.35
1 player
J Palsar
2 player
OL Pike
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
J Palsar
2 player
J Palsar
Strong Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
J Palsar
2 player
Whipple
Weak Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
J Palsar
2 player
J Weir
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
J Palsar
2 player
N Hucker
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
J Palsar
2 player
A Slater
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
J Palsar
2 player
S Reeves
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
J Palsar
2 player
B Sewell
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
J Palsar
2 player
K Winder
No Correlation
0
1 player
J Palsar
2 player
J Boyle
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
J Palsar
2 player
M Boyle
Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
Whipple
2 player
OL Pike
Weak Negative Correlation
0.35
1 player
Whipple
2 player
J Palsar
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
Whipple
2 player
Whipple
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.07
1 player
Whipple
2 player
J Weir
No Correlation
0.43
1 player
Whipple
2 player
N Hucker
Positive Correlation
-0.56
1 player
Whipple
2 player
A Slater
Negative Correlation
0.25
1 player
Whipple
2 player
S Reeves
Weak Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
Whipple
2 player
B Sewell
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
Whipple
2 player
K Winder
No Correlation
-0.11
1 player
Whipple
2 player
J Boyle
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
Whipple
2 player
M Boyle
Positive Correlation
-0.67
1 player
J Weir
2 player
OL Pike
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
J Weir
2 player
J Palsar
Positive Correlation
-0.07
1 player
J Weir
2 player
Whipple
No Correlation
1
1 player
J Weir
2 player
J Weir
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.71
1 player
J Weir
2 player
N Hucker
Negative Correlation
-0.11
1 player
J Weir
2 player
A Slater
No Correlation
-0.25
1 player
J Weir
2 player
S Reeves
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.5
1 player
J Weir
2 player
B Sewell
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
J Weir
2 player
K Winder
No Correlation
-0.11
1 player
J Weir
2 player
J Boyle
No Correlation
-0.25
1 player
J Weir
2 player
M Boyle
Weak Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
N Hucker
2 player
OL Pike
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
N Hucker
2 player
J Palsar
No Correlation
0.43
1 player
N Hucker
2 player
Whipple
Positive Correlation
-0.71
1 player
N Hucker
2 player
J Weir
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
N Hucker
2 player
N Hucker
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
N Hucker
2 player
A Slater
No Correlation
0
1 player
N Hucker
2 player
S Reeves
No Correlation
0.67
1 player
N Hucker
2 player
B Sewell
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
N Hucker
2 player
K Winder
Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
N Hucker
2 player
J Boyle
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
N Hucker
2 player
M Boyle
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
A Slater
2 player
OL Pike
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
A Slater
2 player
J Palsar
Negative Correlation
-0.56
1 player
A Slater
2 player
Whipple
Negative Correlation
-0.11
1 player
A Slater
2 player
J Weir
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
A Slater
2 player
N Hucker
No Correlation
1
1 player
A Slater
2 player
A Slater
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
A Slater
2 player
S Reeves
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
A Slater
2 player
B Sewell
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Slater
2 player
K Winder
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
A Slater
2 player
J Boyle
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.25
1 player
A Slater
2 player
M Boyle
Weak Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
S Reeves
2 player
OL Pike
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
S Reeves
2 player
J Palsar
Negative Correlation
0.25
1 player
S Reeves
2 player
Whipple
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
S Reeves
2 player
J Weir
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
S Reeves
2 player
N Hucker
No Correlation
-0.25
1 player
S Reeves
2 player
A Slater
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
S Reeves
2 player
S Reeves
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
S Reeves
2 player
B Sewell
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
S Reeves
2 player
K Winder
Negative Correlation
-0.25
1 player
S Reeves
2 player
J Boyle
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
S Reeves
2 player
M Boyle
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
B Sewell
2 player
OL Pike
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
B Sewell
2 player
J Palsar
Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
B Sewell
2 player
Whipple
Positive Correlation
-0.5
1 player
B Sewell
2 player
J Weir
Negative Correlation
0.67
1 player
B Sewell
2 player
N Hucker
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
B Sewell
2 player
A Slater
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
B Sewell
2 player
S Reeves
No Correlation
1
1 player
B Sewell
2 player
B Sewell
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
B Sewell
2 player
K Winder
Negative Correlation
-0.25
1 player
B Sewell
2 player
J Boyle
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
B Sewell
2 player
M Boyle
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
K Winder
2 player
OL Pike
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
K Winder
2 player
J Palsar
No Correlation
0
1 player
K Winder
2 player
Whipple
No Correlation
0
1 player
K Winder
2 player
J Weir
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
K Winder
2 player
N Hucker
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
K Winder
2 player
A Slater
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
K Winder
2 player
S Reeves
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
K Winder
2 player
B Sewell
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
K Winder
2 player
K Winder
Strong Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
K Winder
2 player
J Boyle
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
K Winder
2 player
M Boyle
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
J Boyle
2 player
OL Pike
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
J Boyle
2 player
J Palsar
No Correlation
-0.11
1 player
J Boyle
2 player
Whipple
No Correlation
-0.11
1 player
J Boyle
2 player
J Weir
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
J Boyle
2 player
N Hucker
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
J Boyle
2 player
A Slater
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.25
1 player
J Boyle
2 player
S Reeves
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.25
1 player
J Boyle
2 player
B Sewell
Weak Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
J Boyle
2 player
K Winder
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
J Boyle
2 player
J Boyle
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
J Boyle
2 player
M Boyle
No Correlation
0
1 player
M Boyle
2 player
OL Pike
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Boyle
2 player
J Palsar
Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
M Boyle
2 player
Whipple
Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
M Boyle
2 player
J Weir
Weak Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
M Boyle
2 player
N Hucker
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
M Boyle
2 player
A Slater
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
M Boyle
2 player
S Reeves
No Correlation
1
1 player
M Boyle
2 player
B Sewell
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
M Boyle
2 player
K Winder
No Correlation
0
1 player
M Boyle
2 player
J Boyle
No Correlation
1
1 player
M Boyle
2 player
M Boyle
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick OL Pike and S Reeves together
Positive Correlation

Pick J Palsar and J Weir together
Positive Correlation

Pick J Palsar and B Sewell together
Positive Correlation

Pick J Palsar and M Boyle together
Positive Correlation

Pick N Hucker and B Sewell together
Positive Correlation

Pick B Sewell and M Boyle together
Strong Positive Correlation

Pick OL Pike and J Weir together
Negative Correlation

Pick OL Pike and K Winder together
Negative Correlation

Pick OL Pike and J Boyle together
Negative Correlation

Pick J Palsar and S Reeves together
Negative Correlation

Pick J Weir and N Hucker together
Negative Correlation

Pick N Hucker and K Winder together
Negative Correlation

Pick S Reeves and K Winder together
Negative Correlation

Pick B Sewell and K Winder together
Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 Whipple

AR
Similar Perfomance
B Sewell 0.5
M Boyle 0.5
N Hucker 0.43
J Palsar 0.35
S Reeves 0.25
Opposite Perfomance
A Slater -0.56
OL Pike -0.33
J Boyle -0.11
J Weir -0.07

2 J Weir

BAT
Similar Perfomance
J Palsar 0.7
Opposite Perfomance
N Hucker -0.71
OL Pike -0.67
B Sewell -0.5
S Reeves -0.25
M Boyle -0.25
A Slater -0.11
J Boyle -0.11
Whipple -0.07

3 S Reeves

AR
Similar Perfomance
OL Pike 0.7
Whipple 0.25
Opposite Perfomance
J Palsar -0.7
K Winder -0.7
J Weir -0.25
A Slater -0.25
J Boyle -0.25
B Sewell -0.14
M Boyle -0.14

4 M Boyle

BAT
Similar Perfomance
B Sewell 1
J Palsar 0.7
Whipple 0.5
N Hucker 0.33
Opposite Perfomance
J Weir -0.25
A Slater -0.25
S Reeves -0.14

5 B Sewell

AR
Similar Perfomance
M Boyle 1
OL Pike 0.7
J Palsar 0.7
N Hucker 0.67
Whipple 0.5
Opposite Perfomance
K Winder -0.7
J Weir -0.5
J Boyle -0.25
S Reeves -0.14

PerfectLineup © 2024. All Rights Reserved