Upcoming
Fixtures
View All
VP 30 May 07:30 pm WS

Lineup Out

The Rose Bowl
Charlotte Edwards Cup

Best Player Combinations For
VP vs WS

How it Works?

This guide is super useful for identifying player combinations that are likely to score big. Use the filters to identify the best player combinations according to specific match scenarios.

Player correlate positively

Both players generally perform similarly when picked together. They either score high together or score low together. Maximise FPts by picking players that correlate positively with top players.

Player correlate negatively

Both players generally perform in an opposite manner. If one player scores high, the other usually scores low. Avoid picking players that correlate negatively with top player

More on PL Labs

VP vs WS

Show Player Combinations on the basis of:

Best VP Player Combinations

Best VP Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
L Smith BOW SVP
F Davies BAT SVP
G Elwiss BAT SVP
C Knott AR SVP
R Southby WK SVP
A Monaghan BOW SVP
G Adams AR SVP
E Windsor BAT SVP
F Kemp BOW SVP
N Harman AR SVP
M Taylor BOW SVP
L Smith
F Davies
G Elwiss
C Knott
R Southby
A Monaghan
G Adams
E Windsor
F Kemp
N Harman
M Taylor
1
1 player
L Smith
2 player
L Smith
Strong Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
L Smith
2 player
F Davies
Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
L Smith
2 player
G Elwiss
Weak Positive Correlation
0.37
1 player
L Smith
2 player
C Knott
Weak Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
L Smith
2 player
R Southby
Positive Correlation
0.01
1 player
L Smith
2 player
A Monaghan
No Correlation
0.36
1 player
L Smith
2 player
G Adams
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.09
1 player
L Smith
2 player
E Windsor
No Correlation
0.12
1 player
L Smith
2 player
F Kemp
No Correlation
-0.02
1 player
L Smith
2 player
N Harman
No Correlation
0.04
1 player
L Smith
2 player
M Taylor
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
F Davies
2 player
L Smith
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
F Davies
2 player
F Davies
Strong Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
F Davies
2 player
G Elwiss
Weak Positive Correlation
0.45
1 player
F Davies
2 player
C Knott
Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
F Davies
2 player
R Southby
Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
F Davies
2 player
A Monaghan
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
F Davies
2 player
G Adams
Weak Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
F Davies
2 player
E Windsor
No Correlation
0.3
1 player
F Davies
2 player
F Kemp
Weak Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
F Davies
2 player
N Harman
No Correlation
0.3
1 player
F Davies
2 player
M Taylor
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
G Elwiss
2 player
L Smith
Weak Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
G Elwiss
2 player
F Davies
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
G Elwiss
2 player
G Elwiss
Strong Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
G Elwiss
2 player
C Knott
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
G Elwiss
2 player
R Southby
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.13
1 player
G Elwiss
2 player
A Monaghan
No Correlation
0.34
1 player
G Elwiss
2 player
G Adams
Weak Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
G Elwiss
2 player
E Windsor
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
G Elwiss
2 player
F Kemp
Weak Positive Correlation
0.01
1 player
G Elwiss
2 player
N Harman
No Correlation
0.05
1 player
G Elwiss
2 player
M Taylor
No Correlation
0.37
1 player
C Knott
2 player
L Smith
Weak Positive Correlation
0.45
1 player
C Knott
2 player
F Davies
Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
C Knott
2 player
G Elwiss
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
C Knott
2 player
C Knott
Strong Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
C Knott
2 player
R Southby
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.24
1 player
C Knott
2 player
A Monaghan
Weak Negative Correlation
0.59
1 player
C Knott
2 player
G Adams
Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
C Knott
2 player
E Windsor
Weak Negative Correlation
0.32
1 player
C Knott
2 player
F Kemp
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.36
1 player
C Knott
2 player
N Harman
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.25
1 player
C Knott
2 player
M Taylor
Weak Negative Correlation
0.43
1 player
R Southby
2 player
L Smith
Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
R Southby
2 player
F Davies
Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
R Southby
2 player
G Elwiss
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
R Southby
2 player
C Knott
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
R Southby
2 player
R Southby
Strong Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
R Southby
2 player
A Monaghan
No Correlation
0.22
1 player
R Southby
2 player
G Adams
Weak Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
R Southby
2 player
E Windsor
Weak Positive Correlation
0.59
1 player
R Southby
2 player
F Kemp
Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
R Southby
2 player
N Harman
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
R Southby
2 player
M Taylor
Weak Positive Correlation
0.01
1 player
A Monaghan
2 player
L Smith
No Correlation
0.1
1 player
A Monaghan
2 player
F Davies
No Correlation
-0.13
1 player
A Monaghan
2 player
G Elwiss
No Correlation
-0.24
1 player
A Monaghan
2 player
C Knott
Weak Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
A Monaghan
2 player
R Southby
No Correlation
1
1 player
A Monaghan
2 player
A Monaghan
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.16
1 player
A Monaghan
2 player
G Adams
No Correlation
0.36
1 player
A Monaghan
2 player
E Windsor
Weak Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
A Monaghan
2 player
F Kemp
Weak Positive Correlation
0.48
1 player
A Monaghan
2 player
N Harman
Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
A Monaghan
2 player
M Taylor
Weak Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
G Adams
2 player
L Smith
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
G Adams
2 player
F Davies
Weak Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
G Adams
2 player
G Elwiss
Weak Positive Correlation
0.59
1 player
G Adams
2 player
C Knott
Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
G Adams
2 player
R Southby
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.16
1 player
G Adams
2 player
A Monaghan
No Correlation
1
1 player
G Adams
2 player
G Adams
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.15
1 player
G Adams
2 player
E Windsor
No Correlation
0.12
1 player
G Adams
2 player
F Kemp
No Correlation
-0.19
1 player
G Adams
2 player
N Harman
No Correlation
-0.3
1 player
G Adams
2 player
M Taylor
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.09
1 player
E Windsor
2 player
L Smith
No Correlation
0.1
1 player
E Windsor
2 player
F Davies
No Correlation
0.09
1 player
E Windsor
2 player
G Elwiss
No Correlation
-0.23
1 player
E Windsor
2 player
C Knott
Weak Negative Correlation
0.36
1 player
E Windsor
2 player
R Southby
Weak Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
E Windsor
2 player
A Monaghan
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.15
1 player
E Windsor
2 player
G Adams
No Correlation
1
1 player
E Windsor
2 player
E Windsor
Strong Positive Correlation
0.46
1 player
E Windsor
2 player
F Kemp
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
E Windsor
2 player
N Harman
Positive Correlation
0.49
1 player
E Windsor
2 player
M Taylor
Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
F Kemp
2 player
L Smith
No Correlation
0.3
1 player
F Kemp
2 player
F Davies
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
F Kemp
2 player
G Elwiss
Weak Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
F Kemp
2 player
C Knott
Weak Positive Correlation
0.59
1 player
F Kemp
2 player
R Southby
Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
F Kemp
2 player
A Monaghan
Weak Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
F Kemp
2 player
G Adams
No Correlation
0.46
1 player
F Kemp
2 player
E Windsor
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
F Kemp
2 player
F Kemp
Strong Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
F Kemp
2 player
N Harman
No Correlation
0.38
1 player
F Kemp
2 player
M Taylor
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.02
1 player
N Harman
2 player
L Smith
No Correlation
0.07
1 player
N Harman
2 player
F Davies
No Correlation
0.01
1 player
N Harman
2 player
G Elwiss
No Correlation
-0.36
1 player
N Harman
2 player
C Knott
Weak Negative Correlation
0.34
1 player
N Harman
2 player
R Southby
Weak Positive Correlation
0.48
1 player
N Harman
2 player
A Monaghan
Positive Correlation
-0.19
1 player
N Harman
2 player
G Adams
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
N Harman
2 player
E Windsor
Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
N Harman
2 player
F Kemp
No Correlation
1
1 player
N Harman
2 player
N Harman
Strong Positive Correlation
0.56
1 player
N Harman
2 player
M Taylor
Positive Correlation
0.04
1 player
M Taylor
2 player
L Smith
No Correlation
0.3
1 player
M Taylor
2 player
F Davies
Weak Positive Correlation
0.05
1 player
M Taylor
2 player
G Elwiss
No Correlation
-0.25
1 player
M Taylor
2 player
C Knott
Weak Negative Correlation
0.28
1 player
M Taylor
2 player
R Southby
Weak Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
M Taylor
2 player
A Monaghan
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.3
1 player
M Taylor
2 player
G Adams
Weak Negative Correlation
0.49
1 player
M Taylor
2 player
E Windsor
Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
M Taylor
2 player
F Kemp
Weak Positive Correlation
0.56
1 player
M Taylor
2 player
N Harman
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M Taylor
2 player
M Taylor
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick E Windsor and N Harman together
Positive Correlation

High Performing Players

1 G Adams

AR
Similar Perfomance
C Knott 0.59
L Smith 0.36
G Elwiss 0.34
F Davies 0.23
R Southby 0.22
F Kemp 0.12
Opposite Perfomance
M Taylor -0.3
N Harman -0.19
A Monaghan -0.16
E Windsor -0.15

2 G Elwiss

BAT
Similar Perfomance
C Knott 0.39
F Kemp 0.35
G Adams 0.34
R Southby 0.33
F Davies 0.31
L Smith 0.23
E Windsor 0.09
M Taylor 0.05
N Harman 0.01
Opposite Perfomance
A Monaghan -0.13

3 L Smith

BOW
Similar Perfomance
R Southby 0.43
F Davies 0.42
C Knott 0.37
G Adams 0.36
G Elwiss 0.23
F Kemp 0.12
M Taylor 0.04
A Monaghan 0.01
Opposite Perfomance
E Windsor -0.09
N Harman -0.02

4 C Knott

AR
Similar Perfomance
G Adams 0.59
F Davies 0.45
G Elwiss 0.39
L Smith 0.37
F Kemp 0.32
R Southby 0.25
Opposite Perfomance
N Harman -0.36
M Taylor -0.25
A Monaghan -0.24
E Windsor -0.23

5 F Kemp

BOW
Similar Perfomance
R Southby 0.59
E Windsor 0.46
M Taylor 0.38
G Elwiss 0.35
C Knott 0.32
F Davies 0.3
A Monaghan 0.21
N Harman 0.18
L Smith 0.12
G Adams 0.12

Best WS Player Combinations

Best WS Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
E Anderson BOW WSS
A Wellington AR WSS
S Luff BAT WSS
A Griffiths AR WSS
N Wraith WK WSS
E Corney BAT WSS
N Holland BAT WSS
I Wong BOW WSS
M Robbins BOW WSS
C Skelton BOW WSS
S Smale AR WSS
E Anderson
A Wellington
S Luff
A Griffiths
N Wraith
E Corney
N Holland
I Wong
M Robbins
C Skelton
S Smale
1
1 player
E Anderson
2 player
E Anderson
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.05
1 player
E Anderson
2 player
A Wellington
No Correlation
0.1
1 player
E Anderson
2 player
S Luff
No Correlation
0.26
1 player
E Anderson
2 player
A Griffiths
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.06
1 player
E Anderson
2 player
N Wraith
No Correlation
0
1 player
E Anderson
2 player
E Corney
No Correlation
0.6
1 player
E Anderson
2 player
N Holland
Positive Correlation
0.06
1 player
E Anderson
2 player
I Wong
No Correlation
-0.3
1 player
E Anderson
2 player
M Robbins
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.03
1 player
E Anderson
2 player
C Skelton
No Correlation
-0.01
1 player
E Anderson
2 player
S Smale
No Correlation
-0.05
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
E Anderson
No Correlation
1
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
A Wellington
Strong Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
S Luff
No Correlation
0.3
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
A Griffiths
Weak Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
N Wraith
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
E Corney
Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
N Holland
Weak Negative Correlation
0.08
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
I Wong
No Correlation
-0.47
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
M Robbins
Negative Correlation
0.09
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
C Skelton
No Correlation
0.48
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
S Smale
Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
S Luff
2 player
E Anderson
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
S Luff
2 player
A Wellington
No Correlation
1
1 player
S Luff
2 player
S Luff
Strong Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
S Luff
2 player
A Griffiths
No Correlation
0.21
1 player
S Luff
2 player
N Wraith
Weak Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
S Luff
2 player
E Corney
Weak Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
S Luff
2 player
N Holland
Weak Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
S Luff
2 player
I Wong
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
S Luff
2 player
M Robbins
Weak Positive Correlation
0.05
1 player
S Luff
2 player
C Skelton
No Correlation
0.37
1 player
S Luff
2 player
S Smale
Weak Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
A Griffiths
2 player
E Anderson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
A Griffiths
2 player
A Wellington
Weak Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
A Griffiths
2 player
S Luff
No Correlation
1
1 player
A Griffiths
2 player
A Griffiths
Strong Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
A Griffiths
2 player
N Wraith
Weak Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
A Griffiths
2 player
E Corney
Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
A Griffiths
2 player
N Holland
Weak Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
A Griffiths
2 player
I Wong
Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
A Griffiths
2 player
M Robbins
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
A Griffiths
2 player
C Skelton
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
A Griffiths
2 player
S Smale
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.06
1 player
N Wraith
2 player
E Anderson
No Correlation
0.1
1 player
N Wraith
2 player
A Wellington
No Correlation
0.21
1 player
N Wraith
2 player
S Luff
Weak Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
N Wraith
2 player
A Griffiths
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
N Wraith
2 player
N Wraith
Strong Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
N Wraith
2 player
E Corney
Weak Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
N Wraith
2 player
N Holland
Weak Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
N Wraith
2 player
I Wong
No Correlation
0.45
1 player
N Wraith
2 player
M Robbins
Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
N Wraith
2 player
C Skelton
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
N Wraith
2 player
S Smale
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
E Corney
2 player
E Anderson
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
E Corney
2 player
A Wellington
Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
E Corney
2 player
S Luff
Weak Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
E Corney
2 player
A Griffiths
Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
E Corney
2 player
N Wraith
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
E Corney
2 player
E Corney
Strong Positive Correlation
0.55
1 player
E Corney
2 player
N Holland
Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
E Corney
2 player
I Wong
No Correlation
0.1
1 player
E Corney
2 player
M Robbins
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
E Corney
2 player
C Skelton
No Correlation
0.37
1 player
E Corney
2 player
S Smale
Weak Positive Correlation
0.6
1 player
N Holland
2 player
E Anderson
Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
N Holland
2 player
A Wellington
Weak Negative Correlation
0.34
1 player
N Holland
2 player
S Luff
Weak Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
N Holland
2 player
A Griffiths
Weak Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
N Holland
2 player
N Wraith
Weak Positive Correlation
0.55
1 player
N Holland
2 player
E Corney
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
N Holland
2 player
N Holland
Strong Positive Correlation
0.37
1 player
N Holland
2 player
I Wong
Weak Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
N Holland
2 player
M Robbins
Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
N Holland
2 player
C Skelton
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
N Holland
2 player
S Smale
Weak Positive Correlation
0.06
1 player
I Wong
2 player
E Anderson
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
I Wong
2 player
A Wellington
No Correlation
0.22
1 player
I Wong
2 player
S Luff
Weak Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
I Wong
2 player
A Griffiths
Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
I Wong
2 player
N Wraith
No Correlation
0.18
1 player
I Wong
2 player
E Corney
No Correlation
0.37
1 player
I Wong
2 player
N Holland
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
I Wong
2 player
I Wong
Strong Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
I Wong
2 player
M Robbins
Positive Correlation
0.63
1 player
I Wong
2 player
C Skelton
Positive Correlation
0.01
1 player
I Wong
2 player
S Smale
No Correlation
-0.3
1 player
M Robbins
2 player
E Anderson
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.47
1 player
M Robbins
2 player
A Wellington
Negative Correlation
0.2
1 player
M Robbins
2 player
S Luff
Weak Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
M Robbins
2 player
A Griffiths
No Correlation
0.45
1 player
M Robbins
2 player
N Wraith
Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
M Robbins
2 player
E Corney
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
M Robbins
2 player
N Holland
Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
M Robbins
2 player
I Wong
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M Robbins
2 player
M Robbins
Strong Positive Correlation
0.6
1 player
M Robbins
2 player
C Skelton
Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
M Robbins
2 player
S Smale
No Correlation
-0.03
1 player
C Skelton
2 player
E Anderson
No Correlation
0.09
1 player
C Skelton
2 player
A Wellington
No Correlation
0.05
1 player
C Skelton
2 player
S Luff
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
C Skelton
2 player
A Griffiths
Weak Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
C Skelton
2 player
N Wraith
Weak Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
C Skelton
2 player
E Corney
No Correlation
0.22
1 player
C Skelton
2 player
N Holland
Weak Positive Correlation
0.63
1 player
C Skelton
2 player
I Wong
Positive Correlation
0.6
1 player
C Skelton
2 player
M Robbins
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
C Skelton
2 player
C Skelton
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.01
1 player
C Skelton
2 player
S Smale
No Correlation
-0.01
1 player
S Smale
2 player
E Anderson
No Correlation
0.48
1 player
S Smale
2 player
A Wellington
Positive Correlation
0.37
1 player
S Smale
2 player
S Luff
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
S Smale
2 player
A Griffiths
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
S Smale
2 player
N Wraith
Weak Positive Correlation
0.37
1 player
S Smale
2 player
E Corney
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
S Smale
2 player
N Holland
Weak Positive Correlation
0.01
1 player
S Smale
2 player
I Wong
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
S Smale
2 player
M Robbins
No Correlation
-0.01
1 player
S Smale
2 player
C Skelton
No Correlation
1
1 player
S Smale
2 player
S Smale
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick E Anderson and N Holland together
Positive Correlation

Pick I Wong and C Skelton together
Positive Correlation

Pick M Robbins and C Skelton together
Positive Correlation

High Performing Players

1 S Luff

BAT
Similar Perfomance
S Smale 0.37
E Corney 0.34
N Holland 0.34
I Wong 0.22
N Wraith 0.21
M Robbins 0.2
A Wellington 0.11
E Anderson 0.1
A Griffiths 0.07
C Skelton 0.05

2 S Smale

AR
Similar Perfomance
A Wellington 0.48
S Luff 0.37
E Corney 0.37
A Griffiths 0.25
N Holland 0.25
N Wraith 0.2
M Robbins 0.08
I Wong 0.01
Opposite Perfomance
E Anderson -0.01
C Skelton -0.01

3 A Wellington

AR
Similar Perfomance
S Smale 0.48
E Corney 0.42
A Griffiths 0.3
S Luff 0.11
N Wraith 0.1
C Skelton 0.09
I Wong 0.08
Opposite Perfomance
M Robbins -0.47
N Holland -0.25
E Anderson -0.05

4 A Griffiths

AR
Similar Perfomance
I Wong 0.4
E Corney 0.4
N Wraith 0.39
N Holland 0.36
C Skelton 0.35
A Wellington 0.3
E Anderson 0.26
S Smale 0.25
M Robbins 0.13
S Luff 0.07

5 N Wraith

WK
Similar Perfomance
M Robbins 0.45
A Griffiths 0.39
C Skelton 0.34
N Holland 0.31
E Corney 0.26
S Luff 0.21
S Smale 0.2
A Wellington 0.1
I Wong 0.09
Opposite Perfomance
E Anderson -0.06

Best VP Player Combinations

Best VP Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
L Smith BOW SVP
F Davies BAT SVP
G Elwiss BAT SVP
C Knott AR SVP
R Southby WK SVP
A Monaghan BOW SVP
G Adams AR SVP
E Windsor BAT SVP
F Kemp BOW SVP
N Harman AR SVP
M Taylor BOW SVP
L Smith
F Davies
G Elwiss
C Knott
R Southby
A Monaghan
G Adams
E Windsor
F Kemp
N Harman
M Taylor
1
1 player
L Smith
2 player
L Smith
Strong Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
L Smith
2 player
F Davies
Positive Correlation
-0.2
1 player
L Smith
2 player
G Elwiss
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
L Smith
2 player
C Knott
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
L Smith
2 player
R Southby
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.38
1 player
L Smith
2 player
A Monaghan
Weak Negative Correlation
0.18
1 player
L Smith
2 player
G Adams
No Correlation
-0.43
1 player
L Smith
2 player
E Windsor
Negative Correlation
-0.38
1 player
L Smith
2 player
F Kemp
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.5
1 player
L Smith
2 player
N Harman
Negative Correlation
-0.4
1 player
L Smith
2 player
M Taylor
Weak Negative Correlation
0.4
1 player
F Davies
2 player
L Smith
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
F Davies
2 player
F Davies
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
F Davies
2 player
G Elwiss
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
F Davies
2 player
C Knott
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
F Davies
2 player
R Southby
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.43
1 player
F Davies
2 player
A Monaghan
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
F Davies
2 player
G Adams
No Correlation
-0.5
1 player
F Davies
2 player
E Windsor
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
F Davies
2 player
F Kemp
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
F Davies
2 player
N Harman
Weak Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
F Davies
2 player
M Taylor
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.2
1 player
G Elwiss
2 player
L Smith
No Correlation
0
1 player
G Elwiss
2 player
F Davies
No Correlation
1
1 player
G Elwiss
2 player
G Elwiss
Strong Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
G Elwiss
2 player
C Knott
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
G Elwiss
2 player
R Southby
No Correlation
-0.5
1 player
G Elwiss
2 player
A Monaghan
Negative Correlation
0.41
1 player
G Elwiss
2 player
G Adams
Positive Correlation
-0.18
1 player
G Elwiss
2 player
E Windsor
No Correlation
0.16
1 player
G Elwiss
2 player
F Kemp
No Correlation
-0.29
1 player
G Elwiss
2 player
N Harman
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.2
1 player
G Elwiss
2 player
M Taylor
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
C Knott
2 player
L Smith
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
C Knott
2 player
F Davies
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
C Knott
2 player
G Elwiss
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
C Knott
2 player
C Knott
Strong Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
C Knott
2 player
R Southby
No Correlation
-0.71
1 player
C Knott
2 player
A Monaghan
Negative Correlation
0.6
1 player
C Knott
2 player
G Adams
Positive Correlation
-0.71
1 player
C Knott
2 player
E Windsor
Negative Correlation
0.11
1 player
C Knott
2 player
F Kemp
No Correlation
-0.71
1 player
C Knott
2 player
N Harman
Negative Correlation
-0.67
1 player
C Knott
2 player
M Taylor
Negative Correlation
0.2
1 player
R Southby
2 player
L Smith
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
R Southby
2 player
F Davies
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
R Southby
2 player
G Elwiss
No Correlation
0.09
1 player
R Southby
2 player
C Knott
No Correlation
1
1 player
R Southby
2 player
R Southby
Strong Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
R Southby
2 player
A Monaghan
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
R Southby
2 player
G Adams
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.71
1 player
R Southby
2 player
E Windsor
Negative Correlation
0.78
1 player
R Southby
2 player
F Kemp
Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
R Southby
2 player
N Harman
No Correlation
0
1 player
R Southby
2 player
M Taylor
No Correlation
-0.38
1 player
A Monaghan
2 player
L Smith
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.43
1 player
A Monaghan
2 player
F Davies
Negative Correlation
-0.5
1 player
A Monaghan
2 player
G Elwiss
Negative Correlation
-0.71
1 player
A Monaghan
2 player
C Knott
Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
A Monaghan
2 player
R Southby
No Correlation
1
1 player
A Monaghan
2 player
A Monaghan
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.6
1 player
A Monaghan
2 player
G Adams
Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
A Monaghan
2 player
E Windsor
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
A Monaghan
2 player
F Kemp
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
A Monaghan
2 player
N Harman
Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
A Monaghan
2 player
M Taylor
Weak Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
G Adams
2 player
L Smith
No Correlation
0
1 player
G Adams
2 player
F Davies
No Correlation
0.41
1 player
G Adams
2 player
G Elwiss
Positive Correlation
0.6
1 player
G Adams
2 player
C Knott
Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
G Adams
2 player
R Southby
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.6
1 player
G Adams
2 player
A Monaghan
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
G Adams
2 player
G Adams
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.65
1 player
G Adams
2 player
E Windsor
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
G Adams
2 player
F Kemp
No Correlation
-0.43
1 player
G Adams
2 player
N Harman
Negative Correlation
-0.8
1 player
G Adams
2 player
M Taylor
Negative Correlation
-0.43
1 player
E Windsor
2 player
L Smith
Negative Correlation
-0.5
1 player
E Windsor
2 player
F Davies
Negative Correlation
-0.18
1 player
E Windsor
2 player
G Elwiss
No Correlation
-0.71
1 player
E Windsor
2 player
C Knott
Negative Correlation
-0.71
1 player
E Windsor
2 player
R Southby
Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
E Windsor
2 player
A Monaghan
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.65
1 player
E Windsor
2 player
G Adams
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
E Windsor
2 player
E Windsor
Strong Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
E Windsor
2 player
F Kemp
Weak Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
E Windsor
2 player
N Harman
Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
E Windsor
2 player
M Taylor
Positive Correlation
-0.38
1 player
F Kemp
2 player
L Smith
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
F Kemp
2 player
F Davies
No Correlation
0.16
1 player
F Kemp
2 player
G Elwiss
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
F Kemp
2 player
C Knott
No Correlation
0.78
1 player
F Kemp
2 player
R Southby
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
F Kemp
2 player
A Monaghan
No Correlation
0
1 player
F Kemp
2 player
G Adams
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
F Kemp
2 player
E Windsor
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
F Kemp
2 player
F Kemp
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
F Kemp
2 player
N Harman
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
F Kemp
2 player
M Taylor
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.5
1 player
N Harman
2 player
L Smith
Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
N Harman
2 player
F Davies
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.29
1 player
N Harman
2 player
G Elwiss
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.71
1 player
N Harman
2 player
C Knott
Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
N Harman
2 player
R Southby
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
N Harman
2 player
A Monaghan
Positive Correlation
-0.43
1 player
N Harman
2 player
G Adams
Negative Correlation
0.4
1 player
N Harman
2 player
E Windsor
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
N Harman
2 player
F Kemp
No Correlation
1
1 player
N Harman
2 player
N Harman
Strong Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
N Harman
2 player
M Taylor
Positive Correlation
-0.4
1 player
M Taylor
2 player
L Smith
Weak Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
M Taylor
2 player
F Davies
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.2
1 player
M Taylor
2 player
G Elwiss
No Correlation
-0.67
1 player
M Taylor
2 player
C Knott
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
M Taylor
2 player
R Southby
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
M Taylor
2 player
A Monaghan
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.8
1 player
M Taylor
2 player
G Adams
Negative Correlation
0.4
1 player
M Taylor
2 player
E Windsor
Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
M Taylor
2 player
F Kemp
Weak Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
M Taylor
2 player
N Harman
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M Taylor
2 player
M Taylor
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick C Knott and G Adams together
Positive Correlation

Pick R Southby and F Kemp together
Positive Correlation

Pick C Knott and A Monaghan together
Negative Correlation

Pick C Knott and E Windsor together
Negative Correlation

Pick C Knott and N Harman together
Negative Correlation

Pick C Knott and M Taylor together
Negative Correlation

Pick R Southby and E Windsor together
Negative Correlation

Pick A Monaghan and G Adams together
Negative Correlation

Pick G Adams and E Windsor together
Negative Correlation

Pick G Adams and M Taylor together
Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 G Adams

AR
Similar Perfomance
C Knott 0.6
G Elwiss 0.41
R Southby 0.2
L Smith 0.18
Opposite Perfomance
M Taylor -0.8
E Windsor -0.65
A Monaghan -0.6
N Harman -0.43

2 G Elwiss

BAT
Similar Perfomance
G Adams 0.41
C Knott 0.2
F Kemp 0.16
Opposite Perfomance
A Monaghan -0.5
N Harman -0.29
L Smith -0.2
M Taylor -0.2
E Windsor -0.18

3 L Smith

BOW
Similar Perfomance
F Davies 0.4
C Knott 0.2
R Southby 0.2
G Adams 0.18
Opposite Perfomance
N Harman -0.5
E Windsor -0.43
M Taylor -0.4
A Monaghan -0.38
F Kemp -0.38
G Elwiss -0.2

4 C Knott

AR
Similar Perfomance
G Adams 0.6
L Smith 0.2
F Davies 0.2
G Elwiss 0.2
F Kemp 0.11
R Southby 0.09
Opposite Perfomance
A Monaghan -0.71
E Windsor -0.71
N Harman -0.71
M Taylor -0.67

5 F Kemp

BOW
Similar Perfomance
R Southby 0.78
E Windsor 0.33
M Taylor 0.2
G Elwiss 0.16
C Knott 0.11
Opposite Perfomance
L Smith -0.38

Best WS Player Combinations

Best WS Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
E Anderson BOW WSS
A Wellington AR WSS
S Luff BAT WSS
A Griffiths AR WSS
N Wraith WK WSS
E Corney BAT WSS
N Holland BAT WSS
I Wong BOW WSS
M Robbins BOW WSS
C Skelton BOW WSS
S Smale AR WSS
E Anderson
A Wellington
S Luff
A Griffiths
N Wraith
E Corney
N Holland
I Wong
M Robbins
C Skelton
S Smale
1
1 player
E Anderson
2 player
E Anderson
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.42
1 player
E Anderson
2 player
A Wellington
Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
E Anderson
2 player
S Luff
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
E Anderson
2 player
A Griffiths
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
E Anderson
2 player
N Wraith
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
E Anderson
2 player
E Corney
Weak Negative Correlation
0.35
1 player
E Anderson
2 player
N Holland
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
E Anderson
2 player
I Wong
No Correlation
0
1 player
E Anderson
2 player
M Robbins
No Correlation
0
1 player
E Anderson
2 player
C Skelton
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
E Anderson
2 player
S Smale
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.42
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
E Anderson
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
A Wellington
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
S Luff
Weak Negative Correlation
0.42
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
A Griffiths
Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
N Wraith
Positive Correlation
0.67
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
E Corney
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
N Holland
Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
I Wong
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
M Robbins
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
C Skelton
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
S Smale
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
S Luff
2 player
E Anderson
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.25
1 player
S Luff
2 player
A Wellington
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
S Luff
2 player
S Luff
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.57
1 player
S Luff
2 player
A Griffiths
Negative Correlation
-0.15
1 player
S Luff
2 player
N Wraith
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
S Luff
2 player
E Corney
No Correlation
0
1 player
S Luff
2 player
N Holland
No Correlation
-0.5
1 player
S Luff
2 player
I Wong
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
S Luff
2 player
M Robbins
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
S Luff
2 player
C Skelton
No Correlation
-0.05
1 player
S Luff
2 player
S Smale
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
A Griffiths
2 player
E Anderson
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
A Griffiths
2 player
A Wellington
Positive Correlation
-0.57
1 player
A Griffiths
2 player
S Luff
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
A Griffiths
2 player
A Griffiths
Strong Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
A Griffiths
2 player
N Wraith
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
A Griffiths
2 player
E Corney
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
A Griffiths
2 player
N Holland
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
A Griffiths
2 player
I Wong
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Griffiths
2 player
M Robbins
No Correlation
-0.09
1 player
A Griffiths
2 player
C Skelton
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
A Griffiths
2 player
S Smale
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
N Wraith
2 player
E Anderson
Weak Negative Correlation
0.5
1 player
N Wraith
2 player
A Wellington
Positive Correlation
-0.15
1 player
N Wraith
2 player
S Luff
No Correlation
0.13
1 player
N Wraith
2 player
A Griffiths
No Correlation
1
1 player
N Wraith
2 player
N Wraith
Strong Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
N Wraith
2 player
E Corney
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
N Wraith
2 player
N Holland
No Correlation
0
1 player
N Wraith
2 player
I Wong
No Correlation
0
1 player
N Wraith
2 player
M Robbins
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
N Wraith
2 player
C Skelton
No Correlation
-0.26
1 player
N Wraith
2 player
S Smale
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
E Corney
2 player
E Anderson
Weak Negative Correlation
0.67
1 player
E Corney
2 player
A Wellington
Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
E Corney
2 player
S Luff
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
E Corney
2 player
A Griffiths
No Correlation
0.43
1 player
E Corney
2 player
N Wraith
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
E Corney
2 player
E Corney
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
E Corney
2 player
N Holland
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.35
1 player
E Corney
2 player
I Wong
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.35
1 player
E Corney
2 player
M Robbins
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.43
1 player
E Corney
2 player
C Skelton
Negative Correlation
0.43
1 player
E Corney
2 player
S Smale
Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
N Holland
2 player
E Anderson
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
N Holland
2 player
A Wellington
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
N Holland
2 player
S Luff
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
N Holland
2 player
A Griffiths
No Correlation
0
1 player
N Holland
2 player
N Wraith
No Correlation
-0.35
1 player
N Holland
2 player
E Corney
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
N Holland
2 player
N Holland
Strong Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
N Holland
2 player
I Wong
Weak Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
N Holland
2 player
M Robbins
Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
N Holland
2 player
C Skelton
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.38
1 player
N Holland
2 player
S Smale
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
I Wong
2 player
E Anderson
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
I Wong
2 player
A Wellington
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.5
1 player
I Wong
2 player
S Luff
Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
I Wong
2 player
A Griffiths
No Correlation
0
1 player
I Wong
2 player
N Wraith
No Correlation
-0.35
1 player
I Wong
2 player
E Corney
Weak Negative Correlation
0.23
1 player
I Wong
2 player
N Holland
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
I Wong
2 player
I Wong
Strong Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
I Wong
2 player
M Robbins
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
I Wong
2 player
C Skelton
No Correlation
-0.43
1 player
I Wong
2 player
S Smale
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
M Robbins
2 player
E Anderson
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
M Robbins
2 player
A Wellington
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
M Robbins
2 player
S Luff
No Correlation
0
1 player
M Robbins
2 player
A Griffiths
No Correlation
0
1 player
M Robbins
2 player
N Wraith
No Correlation
-0.35
1 player
M Robbins
2 player
E Corney
Weak Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Robbins
2 player
N Holland
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Robbins
2 player
I Wong
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M Robbins
2 player
M Robbins
Strong Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
M Robbins
2 player
C Skelton
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
M Robbins
2 player
S Smale
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
C Skelton
2 player
E Anderson
No Correlation
0
1 player
C Skelton
2 player
A Wellington
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
C Skelton
2 player
S Luff
No Correlation
-0.09
1 player
C Skelton
2 player
A Griffiths
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
C Skelton
2 player
N Wraith
No Correlation
-0.43
1 player
C Skelton
2 player
E Corney
Negative Correlation
0.2
1 player
C Skelton
2 player
N Holland
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
C Skelton
2 player
I Wong
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
C Skelton
2 player
M Robbins
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
C Skelton
2 player
C Skelton
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.54
1 player
C Skelton
2 player
S Smale
Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
S Smale
2 player
E Anderson
Weak Negative Correlation
0.25
1 player
S Smale
2 player
A Wellington
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.05
1 player
S Smale
2 player
S Luff
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
S Smale
2 player
A Griffiths
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.26
1 player
S Smale
2 player
N Wraith
Weak Negative Correlation
0.43
1 player
S Smale
2 player
E Corney
Positive Correlation
-0.38
1 player
S Smale
2 player
N Holland
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.43
1 player
S Smale
2 player
I Wong
Negative Correlation
-0.35
1 player
S Smale
2 player
M Robbins
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.54
1 player
S Smale
2 player
C Skelton
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
S Smale
2 player
S Smale
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick A Wellington and E Corney together
Positive Correlation

Pick N Holland and M Robbins together
Positive Correlation

Pick I Wong and M Robbins together
Positive Correlation

Pick A Wellington and N Holland together
Negative Correlation

Pick A Wellington and M Robbins together
Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 S Luff

BAT
Similar Perfomance
E Corney 0.14
Opposite Perfomance
A Griffiths -0.57
I Wong -0.5
E Anderson -0.33
A Wellington -0.25
N Wraith -0.15
C Skelton -0.14
S Smale -0.05

2 S Smale

AR
Similar Perfomance
E Corney 0.43
A Wellington 0.25
A Griffiths 0.25
Opposite Perfomance
C Skelton -0.54
I Wong -0.43
N Holland -0.38
M Robbins -0.35
E Anderson -0.33
N Wraith -0.26
S Luff -0.05

3 N Wraith

WK
Similar Perfomance
A Wellington 0.5
E Corney 0.43
C Skelton 0.14
A Griffiths 0.13
Opposite Perfomance
E Anderson -0.33
S Smale -0.26
S Luff -0.15

4 A Griffiths

AR
Similar Perfomance
A Wellington 0.42
S Smale 0.25
I Wong 0.14
N Wraith 0.13
N Holland 0.08
Opposite Perfomance
S Luff -0.57
E Anderson -0.14
E Corney -0.14
C Skelton -0.09

5 C Skelton

BOW
Similar Perfomance
M Robbins 0.35
N Holland 0.2
N Wraith 0.14
Opposite Perfomance
S Smale -0.54
E Corney -0.43
S Luff -0.14
A Griffiths -0.09

More on PL Labs

VP vs WS

PerfectLineup © 2025. All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer - PerfectLineup is an educational tool providing detailed analysis of sports players based on their past performances. We are not associated with any gaming activity and do not host any kind of paid or free contests or pool games. Our focus is purely on data-driven solutions to enhance our users' knowledge.

Perfect Lineup is not affiliated in any way to and claims no association, in any capacity whatsoever, with the Residents of the states of SIKKIM, ASSAM, ODISHA, TELANGANA, NAGALAND, ANDHRA PRADESH and where otherwise prohibited by law are not eligible to access Perfect Lineup.

This platform is applicable for users 18+ Only