TYP-W vs DG-W

This guide is super useful for identifying player combinations that are likely to score big. Use the filters to identify the best player combinations according to specific match scenarios.

Both players generally perform similarly when picked together. They either score high together or score low together. Maximise FPts by picking players that correlate positively with top players.

Both players generally perform in an opposite manner. If one player scores high, the other usually scores low. Avoid picking players that correlate negatively with top player

TYP-W vs DG-W

Show Player Combinations on the basis of:

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

A Squires BAT TYP-W

J Loughran WK TYP-W

L McBride AR TYP-W

R Stokell BAT TYP-W

S Forbes BAT TYP-W

Z Craig AR TYP-W

A Canning BOW TYP-W

F Sargent BOW TYP-W

R Searle WK TYP-W

G Dempsey BOW TYP-W

A Squires

J Loughran

L McBride

R Stokell

S Forbes

Z Craig

A Canning

F Sargent

R Searle

G Dempsey

1

1 player

J Loughran

2 player

J Loughran

Strong Positive Correlation

0.38

1 player

J Loughran

2 player

R Stokell

Weak Positive Correlation

0.26

1 player

J Loughran

2 player

S Forbes

Weak Positive Correlation

0.48

1 player

J Loughran

2 player

F Sargent

Positive Correlation

0.21

1 player

J Loughran

2 player

R Searle

Weak Positive Correlation

0.36

1 player

J Loughran

2 player

G Dempsey

Weak Positive Correlation

0.38

1 player

R Stokell

2 player

J Loughran

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

R Stokell

2 player

R Stokell

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.02

1 player

R Stokell

2 player

S Forbes

No Correlation

0.22

1 player

R Stokell

2 player

F Sargent

Weak Positive Correlation

0.09

1 player

R Stokell

2 player

R Searle

No Correlation

0.14

1 player

R Stokell

2 player

G Dempsey

No Correlation

0.26

1 player

S Forbes

2 player

J Loughran

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.02

1 player

S Forbes

2 player

R Stokell

No Correlation

1

1 player

S Forbes

2 player

S Forbes

Strong Positive Correlation

0.14

1 player

S Forbes

2 player

F Sargent

No Correlation

0.45

1 player

S Forbes

2 player

R Searle

Positive Correlation

0.01

1 player

S Forbes

2 player

G Dempsey

No Correlation

0.48

1 player

F Sargent

2 player

J Loughran

Positive Correlation

0.22

1 player

F Sargent

2 player

R Stokell

Weak Positive Correlation

0.14

1 player

F Sargent

2 player

S Forbes

No Correlation

1

1 player

F Sargent

2 player

F Sargent

Strong Positive Correlation

0.15

1 player

F Sargent

2 player

R Searle

No Correlation

0.2

1 player

F Sargent

2 player

G Dempsey

Weak Positive Correlation

0.21

1 player

R Searle

2 player

J Loughran

Weak Positive Correlation

0.09

1 player

R Searle

2 player

R Stokell

No Correlation

0.45

1 player

R Searle

2 player

S Forbes

Positive Correlation

0.15

1 player

R Searle

2 player

F Sargent

No Correlation

1

1 player

R Searle

2 player

R Searle

Strong Positive Correlation

0.38

1 player

R Searle

2 player

G Dempsey

Weak Positive Correlation

0.36

1 player

G Dempsey

2 player

J Loughran

Weak Positive Correlation

0.14

1 player

G Dempsey

2 player

R Stokell

No Correlation

0.01

1 player

G Dempsey

2 player

S Forbes

No Correlation

0.2

1 player

G Dempsey

2 player

F Sargent

Weak Positive Correlation

0.38

1 player

G Dempsey

2 player

R Searle

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

G Dempsey

2 player

G Dempsey

Strong Positive Correlation

Strong Positive Correlation

No Correlation

Strong Negative Correlation

Pick **A Squires** and **R Searle** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **J Loughran** and **Z Craig** together

Positive Correlation

Similar Perfomance

S Forbes 0.45

G Dempsey 0.38

J Loughran 0.21

F Sargent 0.15

R Stokell 0.09

Opposite Perfomance

Similar Perfomance

R Searle 0.45

J Loughran 0.26

F Sargent 0.14

G Dempsey 0.01

Opposite Perfomance

R Stokell -0.02

Similar Perfomance

R Searle 0.38

J Loughran 0.36

F Sargent 0.2

R Stokell 0.14

S Forbes 0.01

Similar Perfomance

J Loughran 0.38

F Sargent 0.22

G Dempsey 0.14

R Searle 0.09

Opposite Perfomance

S Forbes -0.02

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

A Fisher BAT DG-W

L Mcqrahan WK DG-W

T Dunne BAT DG-W

E Noble BAT DG-W

L Little AR DG-W

A Kelly AR DG-W

M Devine BOW DG-W

O Prendergast AR DG-W

A Dalzell BOW DG-W

C Murray BOW DG-W

A Fisher

L Mcqrahan

T Dunne

E Noble

L Little

A Kelly

M Devine

O Prendergast

A Dalzell

C Murray

1

1 player

L Mcqrahan

2 player

L Mcqrahan

Strong Positive Correlation

0.85

1 player

L Mcqrahan

2 player

T Dunne

Strong Positive Correlation

0.55

1 player

L Mcqrahan

2 player

E Noble

Positive Correlation

0.7

1 player

L Mcqrahan

2 player

L Little

Positive Correlation

0

1 player

L Mcqrahan

2 player

A Kelly

No Correlation

0.2

1 player

L Mcqrahan

2 player

O Prendergast

Weak Positive Correlation

0.4

1 player

L Mcqrahan

2 player

A Dalzell

Positive Correlation

0.35

1 player

L Mcqrahan

2 player

C Murray

Weak Positive Correlation

0.85

1 player

T Dunne

2 player

L Mcqrahan

Strong Positive Correlation

1

1 player

T Dunne

2 player

T Dunne

Strong Positive Correlation

0.57

1 player

T Dunne

2 player

E Noble

Positive Correlation

0.4

1 player

T Dunne

2 player

L Little

Positive Correlation

-0.02

1 player

T Dunne

2 player

A Kelly

No Correlation

-0.05

1 player

T Dunne

2 player

O Prendergast

No Correlation

0.22

1 player

T Dunne

2 player

A Dalzell

Weak Positive Correlation

0.22

1 player

T Dunne

2 player

C Murray

Weak Positive Correlation

0.55

1 player

E Noble

2 player

L Mcqrahan

Positive Correlation

0.57

1 player

E Noble

2 player

T Dunne

Positive Correlation

1

1 player

E Noble

2 player

E Noble

Strong Positive Correlation

0.47

1 player

E Noble

2 player

L Little

Positive Correlation

-0.13

1 player

E Noble

2 player

A Kelly

No Correlation

0.7

1 player

E Noble

2 player

O Prendergast

Positive Correlation

0.1

1 player

E Noble

2 player

A Dalzell

No Correlation

0.23

1 player

E Noble

2 player

C Murray

Weak Positive Correlation

0.7

1 player

L Little

2 player

L Mcqrahan

Positive Correlation

0.4

1 player

L Little

2 player

T Dunne

Positive Correlation

0.47

1 player

L Little

2 player

E Noble

Positive Correlation

1

1 player

L Little

2 player

L Little

Strong Positive Correlation

0.16

1 player

L Little

2 player

A Kelly

No Correlation

0.36

1 player

L Little

2 player

O Prendergast

Weak Positive Correlation

0.32

1 player

L Little

2 player

A Dalzell

Weak Positive Correlation

0.28

1 player

L Little

2 player

C Murray

Weak Positive Correlation

0

1 player

A Kelly

2 player

L Mcqrahan

No Correlation

-0.02

1 player

A Kelly

2 player

T Dunne

No Correlation

-0.13

1 player

A Kelly

2 player

E Noble

No Correlation

0.16

1 player

A Kelly

2 player

L Little

No Correlation

1

1 player

A Kelly

2 player

A Kelly

Strong Positive Correlation

0.41

1 player

A Kelly

2 player

O Prendergast

Positive Correlation

0.38

1 player

A Kelly

2 player

A Dalzell

Weak Positive Correlation

0.28

1 player

A Kelly

2 player

C Murray

Weak Positive Correlation

0.2

1 player

O Prendergast

2 player

L Mcqrahan

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.05

1 player

O Prendergast

2 player

T Dunne

No Correlation

0.7

1 player

O Prendergast

2 player

E Noble

Positive Correlation

0.36

1 player

O Prendergast

2 player

L Little

Weak Positive Correlation

0.41

1 player

O Prendergast

2 player

A Kelly

Positive Correlation

1

1 player

O Prendergast

2 player

O Prendergast

Strong Positive Correlation

0.28

1 player

O Prendergast

2 player

A Dalzell

Weak Positive Correlation

0.36

1 player

O Prendergast

2 player

C Murray

Weak Positive Correlation

0.4

1 player

A Dalzell

2 player

L Mcqrahan

Positive Correlation

0.22

1 player

A Dalzell

2 player

T Dunne

Weak Positive Correlation

0.1

1 player

A Dalzell

2 player

E Noble

No Correlation

0.32

1 player

A Dalzell

2 player

L Little

Weak Positive Correlation

0.38

1 player

A Dalzell

2 player

A Kelly

Weak Positive Correlation

0.28

1 player

A Dalzell

2 player

O Prendergast

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

A Dalzell

2 player

A Dalzell

Strong Positive Correlation

0.33

1 player

A Dalzell

2 player

C Murray

Weak Positive Correlation

0.35

1 player

C Murray

2 player

L Mcqrahan

Weak Positive Correlation

0.22

1 player

C Murray

2 player

T Dunne

Weak Positive Correlation

0.23

1 player

C Murray

2 player

E Noble

Weak Positive Correlation

0.28

1 player

C Murray

2 player

L Little

Weak Positive Correlation

0.28

1 player

C Murray

2 player

A Kelly

Weak Positive Correlation

0.36

1 player

C Murray

2 player

O Prendergast

Weak Positive Correlation

0.33

1 player

C Murray

2 player

A Dalzell

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

C Murray

2 player

C Murray

Strong Positive Correlation

Strong Positive Correlation

No Correlation

Strong Negative Correlation

Pick **L Mcqrahan** and **T Dunne** together

Strong Positive Correlation

Pick **L Mcqrahan** and **L Little** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **E Noble** and **O Prendergast** together

Positive Correlation

Similar Perfomance

O Prendergast 0.41

A Dalzell 0.38

C Murray 0.28

L Little 0.16

Opposite Perfomance

E Noble -0.13

T Dunne -0.02

Similar Perfomance

E Noble 0.7

A Kelly 0.41

L Little 0.36

C Murray 0.36

A Dalzell 0.28

L Mcqrahan 0.2

Opposite Perfomance

T Dunne -0.05

Similar Perfomance

O Prendergast 0.36

L Mcqrahan 0.35

A Dalzell 0.33

L Little 0.28

A Kelly 0.28

E Noble 0.23

T Dunne 0.22

Similar Perfomance

L Mcqrahan 0.4

A Kelly 0.38

C Murray 0.33

L Little 0.32

O Prendergast 0.28

T Dunne 0.22

E Noble 0.1

Similar Perfomance

L Mcqrahan 0.7

E Noble 0.47

T Dunne 0.4

O Prendergast 0.36

A Dalzell 0.32

C Murray 0.28

A Kelly 0.16

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

A Squires BAT TYP-W

J Loughran WK TYP-W

L McBride AR TYP-W

R Stokell BAT TYP-W

S Forbes BAT TYP-W

Z Craig AR TYP-W

A Canning BOW TYP-W

F Sargent BOW TYP-W

R Searle WK TYP-W

G Dempsey BOW TYP-W

A Squires

J Loughran

L McBride

R Stokell

S Forbes

Z Craig

A Canning

F Sargent

R Searle

G Dempsey

1

1 player

J Loughran

2 player

J Loughran

Strong Positive Correlation

0.17

1 player

J Loughran

2 player

R Stokell

No Correlation

0.09

1 player

J Loughran

2 player

S Forbes

No Correlation

0.33

1 player

J Loughran

2 player

F Sargent

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.33

1 player

J Loughran

2 player

R Searle

Weak Negative Correlation

0.2

1 player

J Loughran

2 player

G Dempsey

Weak Positive Correlation

0.17

1 player

R Stokell

2 player

J Loughran

No Correlation

1

1 player

R Stokell

2 player

R Stokell

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.33

1 player

R Stokell

2 player

S Forbes

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.4

1 player

R Stokell

2 player

F Sargent

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.29

1 player

R Stokell

2 player

R Searle

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.33

1 player

R Stokell

2 player

G Dempsey

Weak Negative Correlation

0.09

1 player

S Forbes

2 player

J Loughran

No Correlation

-0.33

1 player

S Forbes

2 player

R Stokell

Weak Negative Correlation

1

1 player

S Forbes

2 player

S Forbes

Strong Positive Correlation

0

1 player

S Forbes

2 player

F Sargent

No Correlation

0.67

1 player

S Forbes

2 player

R Searle

Positive Correlation

-0.2

1 player

S Forbes

2 player

G Dempsey

No Correlation

0.33

1 player

F Sargent

2 player

J Loughran

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.4

1 player

F Sargent

2 player

R Stokell

Weak Negative Correlation

0

1 player

F Sargent

2 player

S Forbes

No Correlation

1

1 player

F Sargent

2 player

F Sargent

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.14

1 player

F Sargent

2 player

R Searle

No Correlation

0.17

1 player

F Sargent

2 player

G Dempsey

No Correlation

-0.33

1 player

R Searle

2 player

J Loughran

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.29

1 player

R Searle

2 player

R Stokell

Weak Negative Correlation

0.67

1 player

R Searle

2 player

S Forbes

Positive Correlation

-0.14

1 player

R Searle

2 player

F Sargent

No Correlation

1

1 player

R Searle

2 player

R Searle

Strong Positive Correlation

0.27

1 player

R Searle

2 player

G Dempsey

Weak Positive Correlation

0.2

1 player

G Dempsey

2 player

J Loughran

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.33

1 player

G Dempsey

2 player

R Stokell

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.2

1 player

G Dempsey

2 player

S Forbes

No Correlation

0.17

1 player

G Dempsey

2 player

F Sargent

No Correlation

0.27

1 player

G Dempsey

2 player

R Searle

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

G Dempsey

2 player

G Dempsey

Strong Positive Correlation

Strong Positive Correlation

No Correlation

Strong Negative Correlation

Pick **L McBride** and **Z Craig** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **L McBride** and **A Canning** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **S Forbes** and **R Searle** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **A Squires** and **L McBride** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **A Squires** and **Z Craig** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **A Squires** and **G Dempsey** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **L McBride** and **S Forbes** together

Strong Negative Correlation

Pick **L McBride** and **R Searle** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **Z Craig** and **R Searle** together

Negative Correlation

Similar Perfomance

J Loughran 0.17

Opposite Perfomance

F Sargent -0.4

S Forbes -0.33

G Dempsey -0.33

R Searle -0.29

Similar Perfomance

R Searle 0.27

J Loughran 0.2

F Sargent 0.17

Opposite Perfomance

R Stokell -0.33

S Forbes -0.2

Similar Perfomance

R Searle 0.67

J Loughran 0.09

Opposite Perfomance

R Stokell -0.33

G Dempsey -0.2

Similar Perfomance

J Loughran 0.33

G Dempsey 0.17

Opposite Perfomance

R Stokell -0.4

R Searle -0.14

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

No data found

No data found

TYP-W vs DG-W