WIM 27 May 09:40 pm TWI

Lineup Out

Raynes Park Sports Ground
ECS England T10

Best Player Combinations For
WIM vs TWI

How it Works?

This guide is super useful for identifying player combinations that are likely to score big. Use the filters to identify the best player combinations according to specific match scenarios.

Player correlate positively

Both players generally perform similarly when picked together. They either score high together or score low together. Maximise FPts by picking players that correlate positively with top players.

Player correlate negatively

Both players generally perform in an opposite manner. If one player scores high, the other usually scores low. Avoid picking players that correlate negatively with top player

Show Player Combinations on the basis of:

Best WIM Player Combinations

Best WIM Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad
OL Pike BOW WIM
J Palsar BOW WIM
Whipple AR WIM
J Weir BAT WIM
N Hucker WK WIM
A Slater BAT WIM
S Reeves AR WIM
B Sewell AR WIM
K Winder AR WIM
J Boyle BAT WIM
M Boyle BAT WIM
OL Pike
J Palsar
Whipple
J Weir
N Hucker
A Slater
S Reeves
B Sewell
K Winder
J Boyle
M Boyle
1
1 player
OL Pike
2 player
OL Pike
Strong Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
OL Pike
2 player
J Palsar
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
OL Pike
2 player
Whipple
No Correlation
0.12
1 player
OL Pike
2 player
J Weir
No Correlation
0.8
1 player
OL Pike
2 player
N Hucker
Strong Positive Correlation
0.8
1 player
OL Pike
2 player
A Slater
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
OL Pike
2 player
S Reeves
Weak Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
OL Pike
2 player
B Sewell
Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
OL Pike
2 player
K Winder
Weak Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
OL Pike
2 player
J Boyle
No Correlation
0
1 player
OL Pike
2 player
M Boyle
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
J Palsar
2 player
OL Pike
No Correlation
1
1 player
J Palsar
2 player
J Palsar
Strong Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
J Palsar
2 player
Whipple
Weak Positive Correlation
0.53
1 player
J Palsar
2 player
J Weir
Positive Correlation
0.85
1 player
J Palsar
2 player
N Hucker
Strong Positive Correlation
0.85
1 player
J Palsar
2 player
A Slater
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
J Palsar
2 player
S Reeves
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
J Palsar
2 player
B Sewell
Weak Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
J Palsar
2 player
K Winder
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
J Palsar
2 player
J Boyle
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
J Palsar
2 player
M Boyle
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
Whipple
2 player
OL Pike
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
Whipple
2 player
J Palsar
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
Whipple
2 player
Whipple
Strong Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
Whipple
2 player
J Weir
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
Whipple
2 player
N Hucker
No Correlation
-0.08
1 player
Whipple
2 player
A Slater
No Correlation
0.22
1 player
Whipple
2 player
S Reeves
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
Whipple
2 player
B Sewell
Weak Positive Correlation
0.55
1 player
Whipple
2 player
K Winder
Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
Whipple
2 player
J Boyle
Weak Positive Correlation
0.19
1 player
Whipple
2 player
M Boyle
No Correlation
0.12
1 player
J Weir
2 player
OL Pike
No Correlation
0.53
1 player
J Weir
2 player
J Palsar
Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
J Weir
2 player
Whipple
No Correlation
1
1 player
J Weir
2 player
J Weir
Strong Positive Correlation
0.16
1 player
J Weir
2 player
N Hucker
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
J Weir
2 player
A Slater
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.13
1 player
J Weir
2 player
S Reeves
No Correlation
-0.27
1 player
J Weir
2 player
B Sewell
Weak Negative Correlation
0.85
1 player
J Weir
2 player
K Winder
Strong Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
J Weir
2 player
J Boyle
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.07
1 player
J Weir
2 player
M Boyle
No Correlation
0.8
1 player
N Hucker
2 player
OL Pike
Strong Positive Correlation
0.85
1 player
N Hucker
2 player
J Palsar
Strong Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
N Hucker
2 player
Whipple
No Correlation
0.16
1 player
N Hucker
2 player
J Weir
No Correlation
1
1 player
N Hucker
2 player
N Hucker
Strong Positive Correlation
0.79
1 player
N Hucker
2 player
A Slater
Positive Correlation
-0.1
1 player
N Hucker
2 player
S Reeves
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
N Hucker
2 player
B Sewell
Weak Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
N Hucker
2 player
K Winder
Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
N Hucker
2 player
J Boyle
Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
N Hucker
2 player
M Boyle
Positive Correlation
0.8
1 player
A Slater
2 player
OL Pike
Strong Positive Correlation
0.85
1 player
A Slater
2 player
J Palsar
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.08
1 player
A Slater
2 player
Whipple
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
A Slater
2 player
J Weir
Weak Positive Correlation
0.79
1 player
A Slater
2 player
N Hucker
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
A Slater
2 player
A Slater
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.19
1 player
A Slater
2 player
S Reeves
No Correlation
0.13
1 player
A Slater
2 player
B Sewell
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
A Slater
2 player
K Winder
Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
A Slater
2 player
J Boyle
No Correlation
0.09
1 player
A Slater
2 player
M Boyle
No Correlation
-0.23
1 player
S Reeves
2 player
OL Pike
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
S Reeves
2 player
J Palsar
No Correlation
0.22
1 player
S Reeves
2 player
Whipple
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.13
1 player
S Reeves
2 player
J Weir
No Correlation
-0.1
1 player
S Reeves
2 player
N Hucker
No Correlation
-0.19
1 player
S Reeves
2 player
A Slater
No Correlation
1
1 player
S Reeves
2 player
S Reeves
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.03
1 player
S Reeves
2 player
B Sewell
No Correlation
-0.35
1 player
S Reeves
2 player
K Winder
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.01
1 player
S Reeves
2 player
J Boyle
No Correlation
-0.08
1 player
S Reeves
2 player
M Boyle
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
B Sewell
2 player
OL Pike
Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
B Sewell
2 player
J Palsar
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
B Sewell
2 player
Whipple
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.27
1 player
B Sewell
2 player
J Weir
Weak Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
B Sewell
2 player
N Hucker
Weak Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
B Sewell
2 player
A Slater
No Correlation
-0.03
1 player
B Sewell
2 player
S Reeves
No Correlation
1
1 player
B Sewell
2 player
B Sewell
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.15
1 player
B Sewell
2 player
K Winder
No Correlation
-0.22
1 player
B Sewell
2 player
J Boyle
Weak Negative Correlation
0.31
1 player
B Sewell
2 player
M Boyle
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
K Winder
2 player
OL Pike
Weak Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
K Winder
2 player
J Palsar
Positive Correlation
0.55
1 player
K Winder
2 player
Whipple
Positive Correlation
0.85
1 player
K Winder
2 player
J Weir
Strong Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
K Winder
2 player
N Hucker
Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
K Winder
2 player
A Slater
Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
K Winder
2 player
S Reeves
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.15
1 player
K Winder
2 player
B Sewell
No Correlation
1
1 player
K Winder
2 player
K Winder
Strong Positive Correlation
1
1 player
K Winder
2 player
J Boyle
Strong Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
K Winder
2 player
M Boyle
Weak Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
J Boyle
2 player
OL Pike
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
J Boyle
2 player
J Palsar
Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
J Boyle
2 player
Whipple
Weak Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
J Boyle
2 player
J Weir
Weak Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
J Boyle
2 player
N Hucker
Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
J Boyle
2 player
A Slater
No Correlation
-0.01
1 player
J Boyle
2 player
S Reeves
No Correlation
-0.22
1 player
J Boyle
2 player
B Sewell
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
J Boyle
2 player
K Winder
Strong Positive Correlation
1
1 player
J Boyle
2 player
J Boyle
Strong Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
J Boyle
2 player
M Boyle
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
M Boyle
2 player
OL Pike
No Correlation
0
1 player
M Boyle
2 player
J Palsar
No Correlation
0.19
1 player
M Boyle
2 player
Whipple
No Correlation
-0.07
1 player
M Boyle
2 player
J Weir
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
M Boyle
2 player
N Hucker
Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
M Boyle
2 player
A Slater
No Correlation
-0.08
1 player
M Boyle
2 player
S Reeves
No Correlation
0.31
1 player
M Boyle
2 player
B Sewell
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
M Boyle
2 player
K Winder
Weak Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
M Boyle
2 player
J Boyle
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M Boyle
2 player
M Boyle
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick OL Pike and N Hucker together
Strong Positive Correlation

Pick OL Pike and A Slater together
Strong Positive Correlation

Pick OL Pike and B Sewell together
Positive Correlation

Pick J Palsar and N Hucker together
Strong Positive Correlation

Pick J Palsar and A Slater together
Strong Positive Correlation

Pick J Palsar and K Winder together
Positive Correlation

Pick J Palsar and J Boyle together
Positive Correlation

Pick J Weir and K Winder together
Strong Positive Correlation

Pick N Hucker and A Slater together
Positive Correlation

Pick K Winder and J Boyle together
Strong Positive Correlation

High Performing Players

1 Whipple

AR
Similar Perfomance
K Winder 0.55
J Palsar 0.25
B Sewell 0.23
S Reeves 0.22
J Boyle 0.2
M Boyle 0.19
OL Pike 0.14
J Weir 0.12
N Hucker 0.11
Opposite Perfomance
A Slater -0.08

2 S Reeves

AR
Similar Perfomance
Whipple 0.22
Opposite Perfomance
K Winder -0.35
OL Pike -0.23
A Slater -0.19
J Weir -0.13
N Hucker -0.1
M Boyle -0.08
B Sewell -0.03
J Boyle -0.01

3 M Boyle

BAT
Similar Perfomance
N Hucker 0.5
K Winder 0.35
J Boyle 0.34
B Sewell 0.31
Whipple 0.19
A Slater 0.09
Opposite Perfomance
S Reeves -0.08
J Weir -0.07

4 J Weir

BAT
Similar Perfomance
K Winder 0.85
J Palsar 0.53
A Slater 0.33
J Boyle 0.3
N Hucker 0.16
OL Pike 0.12
Whipple 0.12
Opposite Perfomance
B Sewell -0.27
S Reeves -0.13
M Boyle -0.07

5 B Sewell

AR
Similar Perfomance
OL Pike 0.7
N Hucker 0.33
M Boyle 0.31
Whipple 0.23
J Palsar 0.2
A Slater 0.13
Opposite Perfomance
J Weir -0.27
J Boyle -0.22
K Winder -0.15
S Reeves -0.03

Best TWI Player Combinations

Best TWI Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad
F Fourie AR TWI
D Manuwelge AR TWI
D Prophet BOW TWI
A Mather BOW TWI
M Hunt BOW TWI
B Linde AR TWI
E Berger AR TWI
N Talbot BAT TWI
P Dixon BAT TWI
M Ahmad WK TWI
R Mullahzada AR TWI
F Fourie
D Manuwelge
D Prophet
A Mather
M Hunt
B Linde
E Berger
N Talbot
P Dixon
M Ahmad
R Mullahzada
1
1 player
F Fourie
2 player
F Fourie
Strong Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
F Fourie
2 player
D Manuwelge
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
F Fourie
2 player
D Prophet
Weak Negative Correlation
0.34
1 player
F Fourie
2 player
A Mather
Weak Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
F Fourie
2 player
M Hunt
No Correlation
0.73
1 player
F Fourie
2 player
B Linde
Positive Correlation
0.62
1 player
F Fourie
2 player
E Berger
Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
F Fourie
2 player
N Talbot
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
F Fourie
2 player
P Dixon
Weak Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
F Fourie
2 player
M Ahmad
Weak Positive Correlation
0.44
1 player
F Fourie
2 player
R Mullahzada
Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
D Manuwelge
2 player
F Fourie
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
D Manuwelge
2 player
D Manuwelge
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
D Manuwelge
2 player
D Prophet
Weak Negative Correlation
0.52
1 player
D Manuwelge
2 player
A Mather
Positive Correlation
0.55
1 player
D Manuwelge
2 player
M Hunt
Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
D Manuwelge
2 player
B Linde
Weak Positive Correlation
0.59
1 player
D Manuwelge
2 player
E Berger
Positive Correlation
0.05
1 player
D Manuwelge
2 player
N Talbot
No Correlation
0.34
1 player
D Manuwelge
2 player
P Dixon
Weak Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
D Manuwelge
2 player
M Ahmad
Weak Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
D Manuwelge
2 player
R Mullahzada
No Correlation
-0.35
1 player
D Prophet
2 player
F Fourie
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.35
1 player
D Prophet
2 player
D Manuwelge
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
D Prophet
2 player
D Prophet
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
D Prophet
2 player
A Mather
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
D Prophet
2 player
M Hunt
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.15
1 player
D Prophet
2 player
B Linde
No Correlation
-0.13
1 player
D Prophet
2 player
E Berger
No Correlation
0.27
1 player
D Prophet
2 player
N Talbot
Weak Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
D Prophet
2 player
P Dixon
Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
D Prophet
2 player
M Ahmad
Weak Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
D Prophet
2 player
R Mullahzada
Weak Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
A Mather
2 player
F Fourie
Weak Positive Correlation
0.52
1 player
A Mather
2 player
D Manuwelge
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
A Mather
2 player
D Prophet
No Correlation
1
1 player
A Mather
2 player
A Mather
Strong Positive Correlation
0.78
1 player
A Mather
2 player
M Hunt
Positive Correlation
0.59
1 player
A Mather
2 player
B Linde
Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
A Mather
2 player
E Berger
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
A Mather
2 player
N Talbot
Weak Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
A Mather
2 player
P Dixon
No Correlation
0.54
1 player
A Mather
2 player
M Ahmad
Positive Correlation
0.37
1 player
A Mather
2 player
R Mullahzada
Weak Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
M Hunt
2 player
F Fourie
No Correlation
0.55
1 player
M Hunt
2 player
D Manuwelge
Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
M Hunt
2 player
D Prophet
Weak Positive Correlation
0.78
1 player
M Hunt
2 player
A Mather
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M Hunt
2 player
M Hunt
Strong Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
M Hunt
2 player
B Linde
Weak Positive Correlation
0.05
1 player
M Hunt
2 player
E Berger
No Correlation
0.6
1 player
M Hunt
2 player
N Talbot
Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
M Hunt
2 player
P Dixon
Weak Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
M Hunt
2 player
M Ahmad
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.2
1 player
M Hunt
2 player
R Mullahzada
No Correlation
0.73
1 player
B Linde
2 player
F Fourie
Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
B Linde
2 player
D Manuwelge
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.15
1 player
B Linde
2 player
D Prophet
No Correlation
0.59
1 player
B Linde
2 player
A Mather
Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
B Linde
2 player
M Hunt
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
B Linde
2 player
B Linde
Strong Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
B Linde
2 player
E Berger
Weak Positive Correlation
0.48
1 player
B Linde
2 player
N Talbot
Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
B Linde
2 player
P Dixon
Weak Positive Correlation
0.6
1 player
B Linde
2 player
M Ahmad
Positive Correlation
0.44
1 player
B Linde
2 player
R Mullahzada
Positive Correlation
0.62
1 player
E Berger
2 player
F Fourie
Positive Correlation
0.59
1 player
E Berger
2 player
D Manuwelge
Positive Correlation
-0.13
1 player
E Berger
2 player
D Prophet
No Correlation
0.26
1 player
E Berger
2 player
A Mather
Weak Positive Correlation
0.05
1 player
E Berger
2 player
M Hunt
No Correlation
0.34
1 player
E Berger
2 player
B Linde
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
E Berger
2 player
E Berger
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.03
1 player
E Berger
2 player
N Talbot
No Correlation
0.44
1 player
E Berger
2 player
P Dixon
Positive Correlation
0.53
1 player
E Berger
2 player
M Ahmad
Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
E Berger
2 player
R Mullahzada
No Correlation
0.3
1 player
N Talbot
2 player
F Fourie
Weak Positive Correlation
0.05
1 player
N Talbot
2 player
D Manuwelge
No Correlation
0.27
1 player
N Talbot
2 player
D Prophet
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
N Talbot
2 player
A Mather
Weak Positive Correlation
0.6
1 player
N Talbot
2 player
M Hunt
Positive Correlation
0.48
1 player
N Talbot
2 player
B Linde
Positive Correlation
-0.03
1 player
N Talbot
2 player
E Berger
No Correlation
1
1 player
N Talbot
2 player
N Talbot
Strong Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
N Talbot
2 player
P Dixon
Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
N Talbot
2 player
M Ahmad
No Correlation
0.36
1 player
N Talbot
2 player
R Mullahzada
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
P Dixon
2 player
F Fourie
Weak Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
P Dixon
2 player
D Manuwelge
Weak Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
P Dixon
2 player
D Prophet
Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
P Dixon
2 player
A Mather
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
P Dixon
2 player
M Hunt
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
P Dixon
2 player
B Linde
Weak Positive Correlation
0.44
1 player
P Dixon
2 player
E Berger
Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
P Dixon
2 player
N Talbot
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
P Dixon
2 player
P Dixon
Strong Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
P Dixon
2 player
M Ahmad
Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
P Dixon
2 player
R Mullahzada
Weak Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
M Ahmad
2 player
F Fourie
Weak Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
M Ahmad
2 player
D Manuwelge
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
M Ahmad
2 player
D Prophet
Weak Positive Correlation
0.54
1 player
M Ahmad
2 player
A Mather
Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
M Ahmad
2 player
M Hunt
Weak Positive Correlation
0.6
1 player
M Ahmad
2 player
B Linde
Positive Correlation
0.53
1 player
M Ahmad
2 player
E Berger
Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
M Ahmad
2 player
N Talbot
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
M Ahmad
2 player
P Dixon
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M Ahmad
2 player
M Ahmad
Strong Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
M Ahmad
2 player
R Mullahzada
Positive Correlation
0.44
1 player
R Mullahzada
2 player
F Fourie
Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
R Mullahzada
2 player
D Manuwelge
No Correlation
0.27
1 player
R Mullahzada
2 player
D Prophet
Weak Positive Correlation
0.37
1 player
R Mullahzada
2 player
A Mather
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.2
1 player
R Mullahzada
2 player
M Hunt
No Correlation
0.44
1 player
R Mullahzada
2 player
B Linde
Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
R Mullahzada
2 player
E Berger
No Correlation
0.36
1 player
R Mullahzada
2 player
N Talbot
Weak Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
R Mullahzada
2 player
P Dixon
Weak Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
R Mullahzada
2 player
M Ahmad
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
R Mullahzada
2 player
R Mullahzada
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick F Fourie and B Linde together
Positive Correlation

Pick F Fourie and E Berger together
Positive Correlation

Pick A Mather and M Hunt together
Positive Correlation

Pick M Hunt and N Talbot together
Positive Correlation

Pick B Linde and M Ahmad together
Positive Correlation

High Performing Players

1 F Fourie

AR
Similar Perfomance
B Linde 0.73
E Berger 0.62
R Mullahzada 0.44
M Ahmad 0.38
D Manuwelge 0.34
A Mather 0.34
N Talbot 0.3
P Dixon 0.2
M Hunt 0.1
Opposite Perfomance
D Prophet -0.35

2 B Linde

AR
Similar Perfomance
F Fourie 0.73
M Ahmad 0.6
A Mather 0.59
N Talbot 0.48
R Mullahzada 0.44
D Manuwelge 0.36
M Hunt 0.35
E Berger 0.34
P Dixon 0.23
Opposite Perfomance
D Prophet -0.15

3 E Berger

AR
Similar Perfomance
F Fourie 0.62
D Manuwelge 0.59
M Ahmad 0.53
P Dixon 0.44
B Linde 0.34
A Mather 0.26
R Mullahzada 0.1
M Hunt 0.05
Opposite Perfomance
D Prophet -0.13
N Talbot -0.03

4 D Manuwelge

AR
Similar Perfomance
E Berger 0.59
M Hunt 0.55
A Mather 0.52
B Linde 0.36
F Fourie 0.34
P Dixon 0.34
M Ahmad 0.3
R Mullahzada 0.13
N Talbot 0.05
Opposite Perfomance
D Prophet -0.35

5 A Mather

BOW
Similar Perfomance
M Hunt 0.78
B Linde 0.59
M Ahmad 0.54
D Manuwelge 0.52
R Mullahzada 0.37
N Talbot 0.35
F Fourie 0.34
E Berger 0.26
P Dixon 0.13

Best WIM Player Combinations

Best WIM Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad
OL Pike BOW WIM
J Palsar BOW WIM
Whipple AR WIM
J Weir BAT WIM
N Hucker WK WIM
A Slater BAT WIM
S Reeves AR WIM
B Sewell AR WIM
K Winder AR WIM
J Boyle BAT WIM
M Boyle BAT WIM
OL Pike
J Palsar
Whipple
J Weir
N Hucker
A Slater
S Reeves
B Sewell
K Winder
J Boyle
M Boyle
1
1 player
OL Pike
2 player
OL Pike
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
OL Pike
2 player
J Palsar
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
OL Pike
2 player
Whipple
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.67
1 player
OL Pike
2 player
J Weir
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
OL Pike
2 player
N Hucker
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
OL Pike
2 player
A Slater
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
OL Pike
2 player
S Reeves
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
OL Pike
2 player
B Sewell
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
OL Pike
2 player
K Winder
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
OL Pike
2 player
J Boyle
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
OL Pike
2 player
M Boyle
No Correlation
-0.35
1 player
J Palsar
2 player
OL Pike
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
J Palsar
2 player
J Palsar
Strong Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
J Palsar
2 player
Whipple
Weak Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
J Palsar
2 player
J Weir
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
J Palsar
2 player
N Hucker
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
J Palsar
2 player
A Slater
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
J Palsar
2 player
S Reeves
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
J Palsar
2 player
B Sewell
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
J Palsar
2 player
K Winder
No Correlation
0
1 player
J Palsar
2 player
J Boyle
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
J Palsar
2 player
M Boyle
Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
Whipple
2 player
OL Pike
Weak Negative Correlation
0.35
1 player
Whipple
2 player
J Palsar
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
Whipple
2 player
Whipple
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.07
1 player
Whipple
2 player
J Weir
No Correlation
0.43
1 player
Whipple
2 player
N Hucker
Positive Correlation
-0.56
1 player
Whipple
2 player
A Slater
Negative Correlation
0.25
1 player
Whipple
2 player
S Reeves
Weak Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
Whipple
2 player
B Sewell
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
Whipple
2 player
K Winder
No Correlation
-0.11
1 player
Whipple
2 player
J Boyle
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
Whipple
2 player
M Boyle
Positive Correlation
-0.67
1 player
J Weir
2 player
OL Pike
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
J Weir
2 player
J Palsar
Positive Correlation
-0.07
1 player
J Weir
2 player
Whipple
No Correlation
1
1 player
J Weir
2 player
J Weir
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.71
1 player
J Weir
2 player
N Hucker
Negative Correlation
-0.11
1 player
J Weir
2 player
A Slater
No Correlation
-0.25
1 player
J Weir
2 player
S Reeves
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.5
1 player
J Weir
2 player
B Sewell
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
J Weir
2 player
K Winder
No Correlation
-0.11
1 player
J Weir
2 player
J Boyle
No Correlation
-0.25
1 player
J Weir
2 player
M Boyle
Weak Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
N Hucker
2 player
OL Pike
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
N Hucker
2 player
J Palsar
No Correlation
0.43
1 player
N Hucker
2 player
Whipple
Positive Correlation
-0.71
1 player
N Hucker
2 player
J Weir
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
N Hucker
2 player
N Hucker
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
N Hucker
2 player
A Slater
No Correlation
0
1 player
N Hucker
2 player
S Reeves
No Correlation
0.67
1 player
N Hucker
2 player
B Sewell
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
N Hucker
2 player
K Winder
Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
N Hucker
2 player
J Boyle
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
N Hucker
2 player
M Boyle
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
A Slater
2 player
OL Pike
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
A Slater
2 player
J Palsar
Negative Correlation
-0.56
1 player
A Slater
2 player
Whipple
Negative Correlation
-0.11
1 player
A Slater
2 player
J Weir
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
A Slater
2 player
N Hucker
No Correlation
1
1 player
A Slater
2 player
A Slater
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
A Slater
2 player
S Reeves
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
A Slater
2 player
B Sewell
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Slater
2 player
K Winder
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
A Slater
2 player
J Boyle
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.25
1 player
A Slater
2 player
M Boyle
Weak Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
S Reeves
2 player
OL Pike
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
S Reeves
2 player
J Palsar
Negative Correlation
0.25
1 player
S Reeves
2 player
Whipple
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
S Reeves
2 player
J Weir
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
S Reeves
2 player
N Hucker
No Correlation
-0.25
1 player
S Reeves
2 player
A Slater
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
S Reeves
2 player
S Reeves
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
S Reeves
2 player
B Sewell
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
S Reeves
2 player
K Winder
Negative Correlation
-0.25
1 player
S Reeves
2 player
J Boyle
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
S Reeves
2 player
M Boyle
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
B Sewell
2 player
OL Pike
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
B Sewell
2 player
J Palsar
Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
B Sewell
2 player
Whipple
Positive Correlation
-0.5
1 player
B Sewell
2 player
J Weir
Negative Correlation
0.67
1 player
B Sewell
2 player
N Hucker
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
B Sewell
2 player
A Slater
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
B Sewell
2 player
S Reeves
No Correlation
1
1 player
B Sewell
2 player
B Sewell
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
B Sewell
2 player
K Winder
Negative Correlation
-0.25
1 player
B Sewell
2 player
J Boyle
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
B Sewell
2 player
M Boyle
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
K Winder
2 player
OL Pike
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
K Winder
2 player
J Palsar
No Correlation
0
1 player
K Winder
2 player
Whipple
No Correlation
0
1 player
K Winder
2 player
J Weir
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
K Winder
2 player
N Hucker
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
K Winder
2 player
A Slater
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
K Winder
2 player
S Reeves
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
K Winder
2 player
B Sewell
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
K Winder
2 player
K Winder
Strong Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
K Winder
2 player
J Boyle
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
K Winder
2 player
M Boyle
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
J Boyle
2 player
OL Pike
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
J Boyle
2 player
J Palsar
No Correlation
-0.11
1 player
J Boyle
2 player
Whipple
No Correlation
-0.11
1 player
J Boyle
2 player
J Weir
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
J Boyle
2 player
N Hucker
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
J Boyle
2 player
A Slater
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.25
1 player
J Boyle
2 player
S Reeves
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.25
1 player
J Boyle
2 player
B Sewell
Weak Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
J Boyle
2 player
K Winder
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
J Boyle
2 player
J Boyle
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
J Boyle
2 player
M Boyle
No Correlation
0
1 player
M Boyle
2 player
OL Pike
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Boyle
2 player
J Palsar
Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
M Boyle
2 player
Whipple
Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
M Boyle
2 player
J Weir
Weak Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
M Boyle
2 player
N Hucker
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
M Boyle
2 player
A Slater
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
M Boyle
2 player
S Reeves
No Correlation
1
1 player
M Boyle
2 player
B Sewell
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
M Boyle
2 player
K Winder
No Correlation
0
1 player
M Boyle
2 player
J Boyle
No Correlation
1
1 player
M Boyle
2 player
M Boyle
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick OL Pike and S Reeves together
Positive Correlation

Pick J Palsar and J Weir together
Positive Correlation

Pick J Palsar and B Sewell together
Positive Correlation

Pick J Palsar and M Boyle together
Positive Correlation

Pick N Hucker and B Sewell together
Positive Correlation

Pick B Sewell and M Boyle together
Strong Positive Correlation

Pick OL Pike and J Weir together
Negative Correlation

Pick OL Pike and K Winder together
Negative Correlation

Pick OL Pike and J Boyle together
Negative Correlation

Pick J Palsar and S Reeves together
Negative Correlation

Pick J Weir and N Hucker together
Negative Correlation

Pick N Hucker and K Winder together
Negative Correlation

Pick S Reeves and K Winder together
Negative Correlation

Pick B Sewell and K Winder together
Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 Whipple

AR
Similar Perfomance
B Sewell 0.5
M Boyle 0.5
N Hucker 0.43
J Palsar 0.35
S Reeves 0.25
Opposite Perfomance
A Slater -0.56
OL Pike -0.33
J Boyle -0.11
J Weir -0.07

2 J Weir

BAT
Similar Perfomance
J Palsar 0.7
Opposite Perfomance
N Hucker -0.71
OL Pike -0.67
B Sewell -0.5
S Reeves -0.25
M Boyle -0.25
A Slater -0.11
J Boyle -0.11
Whipple -0.07

3 S Reeves

AR
Similar Perfomance
OL Pike 0.7
Whipple 0.25
Opposite Perfomance
J Palsar -0.7
K Winder -0.7
J Weir -0.25
A Slater -0.25
J Boyle -0.25
B Sewell -0.14
M Boyle -0.14

4 M Boyle

BAT
Similar Perfomance
B Sewell 1
J Palsar 0.7
Whipple 0.5
N Hucker 0.33
Opposite Perfomance
J Weir -0.25
A Slater -0.25
S Reeves -0.14

5 B Sewell

AR
Similar Perfomance
M Boyle 1
OL Pike 0.7
J Palsar 0.7
N Hucker 0.67
Whipple 0.5
Opposite Perfomance
K Winder -0.7
J Weir -0.5
J Boyle -0.25
S Reeves -0.14

Best TWI Player Combinations

Best TWI Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

No data found

No data found

High Performing Players

PerfectLineup © 2024. All Rights Reserved