WIM vs TWI

This guide is super useful for identifying player combinations that are likely to score big. Use the filters to identify the best player combinations according to specific match scenarios.

Both players generally perform similarly when picked together. They either score high together or score low together. Maximise FPts by picking players that correlate positively with top players.

Both players generally perform in an opposite manner. If one player scores high, the other usually scores low. Avoid picking players that correlate negatively with top player

Show Player Combinations on the basis of:

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

OL Pike BOW WIM

J Palsar BOW WIM

Whipple AR WIM

J Weir BAT WIM

N Hucker WK WIM

A Slater BAT WIM

S Reeves AR WIM

B Sewell AR WIM

K Winder AR WIM

J Boyle BAT WIM

M Boyle BAT WIM

OL Pike

J Palsar

Whipple

J Weir

N Hucker

A Slater

S Reeves

B Sewell

K Winder

J Boyle

M Boyle

1

1 player

OL Pike

2 player

OL Pike

Strong Positive Correlation

0.14

1 player

OL Pike

2 player

J Palsar

No Correlation

0.14

1 player

OL Pike

2 player

Whipple

No Correlation

0.12

1 player

OL Pike

2 player

J Weir

No Correlation

0.8

1 player

OL Pike

2 player

N Hucker

Strong Positive Correlation

0.8

1 player

OL Pike

2 player

A Slater

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.23

1 player

OL Pike

2 player

S Reeves

Weak Negative Correlation

0.7

1 player

OL Pike

2 player

B Sewell

Positive Correlation

0.35

1 player

OL Pike

2 player

K Winder

Weak Positive Correlation

0.1

1 player

OL Pike

2 player

J Boyle

No Correlation

0

1 player

OL Pike

2 player

M Boyle

No Correlation

0.14

1 player

J Palsar

2 player

OL Pike

No Correlation

1

1 player

J Palsar

2 player

J Palsar

Strong Positive Correlation

0.25

1 player

J Palsar

2 player

Whipple

Weak Positive Correlation

0.53

1 player

J Palsar

2 player

J Weir

Positive Correlation

0.85

1 player

J Palsar

2 player

N Hucker

Strong Positive Correlation

0.85

1 player

J Palsar

2 player

A Slater

Strong Positive Correlation

0

1 player

J Palsar

2 player

S Reeves

No Correlation

0.2

1 player

J Palsar

2 player

B Sewell

Weak Positive Correlation

0.7

1 player

J Palsar

2 player

K Winder

Positive Correlation

0.7

1 player

J Palsar

2 player

J Boyle

Positive Correlation

0

1 player

J Palsar

2 player

M Boyle

No Correlation

0.14

1 player

Whipple

2 player

OL Pike

No Correlation

0.25

1 player

Whipple

2 player

J Palsar

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

Whipple

2 player

Whipple

Strong Positive Correlation

0.12

1 player

Whipple

2 player

J Weir

No Correlation

0.11

1 player

Whipple

2 player

N Hucker

No Correlation

-0.08

1 player

Whipple

2 player

A Slater

No Correlation

0.22

1 player

Whipple

2 player

S Reeves

Weak Positive Correlation

0.23

1 player

Whipple

2 player

B Sewell

Weak Positive Correlation

0.55

1 player

Whipple

2 player

K Winder

Positive Correlation

0.2

1 player

Whipple

2 player

J Boyle

Weak Positive Correlation

0.19

1 player

Whipple

2 player

M Boyle

No Correlation

0.12

1 player

J Weir

2 player

OL Pike

No Correlation

0.53

1 player

J Weir

2 player

J Palsar

Positive Correlation

0.12

1 player

J Weir

2 player

Whipple

No Correlation

1

1 player

J Weir

2 player

J Weir

Strong Positive Correlation

0.16

1 player

J Weir

2 player

N Hucker

No Correlation

0.33

1 player

J Weir

2 player

A Slater

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.13

1 player

J Weir

2 player

S Reeves

No Correlation

-0.27

1 player

J Weir

2 player

B Sewell

Weak Negative Correlation

0.85

1 player

J Weir

2 player

K Winder

Strong Positive Correlation

0.3

1 player

J Weir

2 player

J Boyle

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.07

1 player

J Weir

2 player

M Boyle

No Correlation

0.8

1 player

N Hucker

2 player

OL Pike

Strong Positive Correlation

0.85

1 player

N Hucker

2 player

J Palsar

Strong Positive Correlation

0.11

1 player

N Hucker

2 player

Whipple

No Correlation

0.16

1 player

N Hucker

2 player

J Weir

No Correlation

1

1 player

N Hucker

2 player

N Hucker

Strong Positive Correlation

0.79

1 player

N Hucker

2 player

A Slater

Positive Correlation

-0.1

1 player

N Hucker

2 player

S Reeves

No Correlation

0.33

1 player

N Hucker

2 player

B Sewell

Weak Positive Correlation

0.5

1 player

N Hucker

2 player

K Winder

Positive Correlation

0.43

1 player

N Hucker

2 player

J Boyle

Positive Correlation

0.5

1 player

N Hucker

2 player

M Boyle

Positive Correlation

0.8

1 player

A Slater

2 player

OL Pike

Strong Positive Correlation

0.85

1 player

A Slater

2 player

J Palsar

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.08

1 player

A Slater

2 player

Whipple

No Correlation

0.33

1 player

A Slater

2 player

J Weir

Weak Positive Correlation

0.79

1 player

A Slater

2 player

N Hucker

Positive Correlation

1

1 player

A Slater

2 player

A Slater

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.19

1 player

A Slater

2 player

S Reeves

No Correlation

0.13

1 player

A Slater

2 player

B Sewell

No Correlation

0.5

1 player

A Slater

2 player

K Winder

Positive Correlation

0.14

1 player

A Slater

2 player

J Boyle

No Correlation

0.09

1 player

A Slater

2 player

M Boyle

No Correlation

-0.23

1 player

S Reeves

2 player

OL Pike

Weak Negative Correlation

0

1 player

S Reeves

2 player

J Palsar

No Correlation

0.22

1 player

S Reeves

2 player

Whipple

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.13

1 player

S Reeves

2 player

J Weir

No Correlation

-0.1

1 player

S Reeves

2 player

N Hucker

No Correlation

-0.19

1 player

S Reeves

2 player

A Slater

No Correlation

1

1 player

S Reeves

2 player

S Reeves

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.03

1 player

S Reeves

2 player

B Sewell

No Correlation

-0.35

1 player

S Reeves

2 player

K Winder

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.01

1 player

S Reeves

2 player

J Boyle

No Correlation

-0.08

1 player

S Reeves

2 player

M Boyle

No Correlation

0.7

1 player

B Sewell

2 player

OL Pike

Positive Correlation

0.2

1 player

B Sewell

2 player

J Palsar

Weak Positive Correlation

0.23

1 player

B Sewell

2 player

Whipple

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.27

1 player

B Sewell

2 player

J Weir

Weak Negative Correlation

0.33

1 player

B Sewell

2 player

N Hucker

Weak Positive Correlation

0.13

1 player

B Sewell

2 player

A Slater

No Correlation

-0.03

1 player

B Sewell

2 player

S Reeves

No Correlation

1

1 player

B Sewell

2 player

B Sewell

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.15

1 player

B Sewell

2 player

K Winder

No Correlation

-0.22

1 player

B Sewell

2 player

J Boyle

Weak Negative Correlation

0.31

1 player

B Sewell

2 player

M Boyle

Weak Positive Correlation

0.35

1 player

K Winder

2 player

OL Pike

Weak Positive Correlation

0.7

1 player

K Winder

2 player

J Palsar

Positive Correlation

0.55

1 player

K Winder

2 player

Whipple

Positive Correlation

0.85

1 player

K Winder

2 player

J Weir

Strong Positive Correlation

0.5

1 player

K Winder

2 player

N Hucker

Positive Correlation

0.5

1 player

K Winder

2 player

A Slater

Positive Correlation

-0.35

1 player

K Winder

2 player

S Reeves

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.15

1 player

K Winder

2 player

B Sewell

No Correlation

1

1 player

K Winder

2 player

K Winder

Strong Positive Correlation

1

1 player

K Winder

2 player

J Boyle

Strong Positive Correlation

0.35

1 player

K Winder

2 player

M Boyle

Weak Positive Correlation

0.1

1 player

J Boyle

2 player

OL Pike

No Correlation

0.7

1 player

J Boyle

2 player

J Palsar

Positive Correlation

0.2

1 player

J Boyle

2 player

Whipple

Weak Positive Correlation

0.3

1 player

J Boyle

2 player

J Weir

Weak Positive Correlation

0.43

1 player

J Boyle

2 player

N Hucker

Positive Correlation

0.14

1 player

J Boyle

2 player

A Slater

No Correlation

-0.01

1 player

J Boyle

2 player

S Reeves

No Correlation

-0.22

1 player

J Boyle

2 player

B Sewell

Weak Negative Correlation

1

1 player

J Boyle

2 player

K Winder

Strong Positive Correlation

1

1 player

J Boyle

2 player

J Boyle

Strong Positive Correlation

0.34

1 player

J Boyle

2 player

M Boyle

Weak Positive Correlation

0

1 player

M Boyle

2 player

OL Pike

No Correlation

0

1 player

M Boyle

2 player

J Palsar

No Correlation

0.19

1 player

M Boyle

2 player

Whipple

No Correlation

-0.07

1 player

M Boyle

2 player

J Weir

No Correlation

0.5

1 player

M Boyle

2 player

N Hucker

Positive Correlation

0.09

1 player

M Boyle

2 player

A Slater

No Correlation

-0.08

1 player

M Boyle

2 player

S Reeves

No Correlation

0.31

1 player

M Boyle

2 player

B Sewell

Weak Positive Correlation

0.35

1 player

M Boyle

2 player

K Winder

Weak Positive Correlation

0.34

1 player

M Boyle

2 player

J Boyle

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

M Boyle

2 player

M Boyle

Strong Positive Correlation

Strong Positive Correlation

No Correlation

Strong Negative Correlation

Pick **OL Pike** and **N Hucker** together

Strong Positive Correlation

Pick **OL Pike** and **A Slater** together

Strong Positive Correlation

Pick **OL Pike** and **B Sewell** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **J Palsar** and **N Hucker** together

Strong Positive Correlation

Pick **J Palsar** and **A Slater** together

Strong Positive Correlation

Pick **J Palsar** and **K Winder** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **J Palsar** and **J Boyle** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **J Weir** and **K Winder** together

Strong Positive Correlation

Pick **N Hucker** and **A Slater** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **K Winder** and **J Boyle** together

Strong Positive Correlation

Similar Perfomance

K Winder 0.55

J Palsar 0.25

B Sewell 0.23

S Reeves 0.22

J Boyle 0.2

M Boyle 0.19

OL Pike 0.14

J Weir 0.12

N Hucker 0.11

Opposite Perfomance

A Slater -0.08

Similar Perfomance

Whipple 0.22

Opposite Perfomance

K Winder -0.35

OL Pike -0.23

A Slater -0.19

J Weir -0.13

N Hucker -0.1

M Boyle -0.08

B Sewell -0.03

J Boyle -0.01

Similar Perfomance

N Hucker 0.5

K Winder 0.35

J Boyle 0.34

B Sewell 0.31

Whipple 0.19

A Slater 0.09

Opposite Perfomance

S Reeves -0.08

J Weir -0.07

Similar Perfomance

K Winder 0.85

J Palsar 0.53

A Slater 0.33

J Boyle 0.3

N Hucker 0.16

OL Pike 0.12

Whipple 0.12

Opposite Perfomance

B Sewell -0.27

S Reeves -0.13

M Boyle -0.07

Similar Perfomance

OL Pike 0.7

N Hucker 0.33

M Boyle 0.31

Whipple 0.23

J Palsar 0.2

A Slater 0.13

Opposite Perfomance

J Weir -0.27

J Boyle -0.22

K Winder -0.15

S Reeves -0.03

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

F Fourie AR TWI

D Manuwelge AR TWI

D Prophet BOW TWI

A Mather BOW TWI

M Hunt BOW TWI

B Linde AR TWI

E Berger AR TWI

N Talbot BAT TWI

P Dixon BAT TWI

M Ahmad WK TWI

R Mullahzada AR TWI

F Fourie

D Manuwelge

D Prophet

A Mather

M Hunt

B Linde

E Berger

N Talbot

P Dixon

M Ahmad

R Mullahzada

1

1 player

F Fourie

2 player

F Fourie

Strong Positive Correlation

0.34

1 player

F Fourie

2 player

D Manuwelge

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.35

1 player

F Fourie

2 player

D Prophet

Weak Negative Correlation

0.34

1 player

F Fourie

2 player

A Mather

Weak Positive Correlation

0.1

1 player

F Fourie

2 player

M Hunt

No Correlation

0.73

1 player

F Fourie

2 player

B Linde

Positive Correlation

0.62

1 player

F Fourie

2 player

E Berger

Positive Correlation

0.3

1 player

F Fourie

2 player

N Talbot

Weak Positive Correlation

0.2

1 player

F Fourie

2 player

P Dixon

Weak Positive Correlation

0.38

1 player

F Fourie

2 player

M Ahmad

Weak Positive Correlation

0.34

1 player

D Manuwelge

2 player

F Fourie

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

D Manuwelge

2 player

D Manuwelge

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.35

1 player

D Manuwelge

2 player

D Prophet

Weak Negative Correlation

0.52

1 player

D Manuwelge

2 player

A Mather

Positive Correlation

0.55

1 player

D Manuwelge

2 player

M Hunt

Positive Correlation

0.36

1 player

D Manuwelge

2 player

B Linde

Weak Positive Correlation

0.59

1 player

D Manuwelge

2 player

E Berger

Positive Correlation

0.05

1 player

D Manuwelge

2 player

N Talbot

No Correlation

0.34

1 player

D Manuwelge

2 player

P Dixon

Weak Positive Correlation

0.3

1 player

D Manuwelge

2 player

M Ahmad

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.35

1 player

D Prophet

2 player

F Fourie

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.35

1 player

D Prophet

2 player

D Manuwelge

Weak Negative Correlation

1

1 player

D Prophet

2 player

D Prophet

Strong Positive Correlation

0

1 player

D Prophet

2 player

A Mather

No Correlation

0.33

1 player

D Prophet

2 player

M Hunt

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.15

1 player

D Prophet

2 player

B Linde

No Correlation

-0.13

1 player

D Prophet

2 player

E Berger

No Correlation

0.27

1 player

D Prophet

2 player

N Talbot

Weak Positive Correlation

0.43

1 player

D Prophet

2 player

P Dixon

Positive Correlation

0.33

1 player

D Prophet

2 player

M Ahmad

Weak Positive Correlation

0.34

1 player

A Mather

2 player

F Fourie

Weak Positive Correlation

0.52

1 player

A Mather

2 player

D Manuwelge

Positive Correlation

0

1 player

A Mather

2 player

D Prophet

No Correlation

1

1 player

A Mather

2 player

A Mather

Strong Positive Correlation

0.78

1 player

A Mather

2 player

M Hunt

Positive Correlation

0.59

1 player

A Mather

2 player

B Linde

Positive Correlation

0.26

1 player

A Mather

2 player

E Berger

Weak Positive Correlation

0.35

1 player

A Mather

2 player

N Talbot

Weak Positive Correlation

0.13

1 player

A Mather

2 player

P Dixon

No Correlation

0.54

1 player

A Mather

2 player

M Ahmad

Positive Correlation

0.1

1 player

M Hunt

2 player

F Fourie

No Correlation

0.55

1 player

M Hunt

2 player

D Manuwelge

Positive Correlation

0.33

1 player

M Hunt

2 player

D Prophet

Weak Positive Correlation

0.78

1 player

M Hunt

2 player

A Mather

Positive Correlation

1

1 player

M Hunt

2 player

M Hunt

Strong Positive Correlation

0.35

1 player

M Hunt

2 player

B Linde

Weak Positive Correlation

0.05

1 player

M Hunt

2 player

E Berger

No Correlation

0.6

1 player

M Hunt

2 player

N Talbot

Positive Correlation

0.25

1 player

M Hunt

2 player

P Dixon

Weak Positive Correlation

0.27

1 player

M Hunt

2 player

M Ahmad

Weak Positive Correlation

0.73

1 player

B Linde

2 player

F Fourie

Positive Correlation

0.36

1 player

B Linde

2 player

D Manuwelge

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.15

1 player

B Linde

2 player

D Prophet

No Correlation

0.59

1 player

B Linde

2 player

A Mather

Positive Correlation

0.35

1 player

B Linde

2 player

M Hunt

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

B Linde

2 player

B Linde

Strong Positive Correlation

0.34

1 player

B Linde

2 player

E Berger

Weak Positive Correlation

0.48

1 player

B Linde

2 player

N Talbot

Positive Correlation

0.23

1 player

B Linde

2 player

P Dixon

Weak Positive Correlation

0.6

1 player

B Linde

2 player

M Ahmad

Positive Correlation

0.62

1 player

E Berger

2 player

F Fourie

Positive Correlation

0.59

1 player

E Berger

2 player

D Manuwelge

Positive Correlation

-0.13

1 player

E Berger

2 player

D Prophet

No Correlation

0.26

1 player

E Berger

2 player

A Mather

Weak Positive Correlation

0.05

1 player

E Berger

2 player

M Hunt

No Correlation

0.34

1 player

E Berger

2 player

B Linde

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

E Berger

2 player

E Berger

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.03

1 player

E Berger

2 player

N Talbot

No Correlation

0.44

1 player

E Berger

2 player

P Dixon

Positive Correlation

0.53

1 player

E Berger

2 player

M Ahmad

Positive Correlation

0.3

1 player

N Talbot

2 player

F Fourie

Weak Positive Correlation

0.05

1 player

N Talbot

2 player

D Manuwelge

No Correlation

0.27

1 player

N Talbot

2 player

D Prophet

Weak Positive Correlation

0.35

1 player

N Talbot

2 player

A Mather

Weak Positive Correlation

0.6

1 player

N Talbot

2 player

M Hunt

Positive Correlation

0.48

1 player

N Talbot

2 player

B Linde

Positive Correlation

-0.03

1 player

N Talbot

2 player

E Berger

No Correlation

1

1 player

N Talbot

2 player

N Talbot

Strong Positive Correlation

0.47

1 player

N Talbot

2 player

P Dixon

Positive Correlation

0.07

1 player

N Talbot

2 player

M Ahmad

No Correlation

0.2

1 player

P Dixon

2 player

F Fourie

Weak Positive Correlation

0.34

1 player

P Dixon

2 player

D Manuwelge

Weak Positive Correlation

0.43

1 player

P Dixon

2 player

D Prophet

Positive Correlation

0.13

1 player

P Dixon

2 player

A Mather

No Correlation

0.25

1 player

P Dixon

2 player

M Hunt

Weak Positive Correlation

0.23

1 player

P Dixon

2 player

B Linde

Weak Positive Correlation

0.44

1 player

P Dixon

2 player

E Berger

Positive Correlation

0.47

1 player

P Dixon

2 player

N Talbot

Positive Correlation

1

1 player

P Dixon

2 player

P Dixon

Strong Positive Correlation

0.5

1 player

P Dixon

2 player

M Ahmad

Positive Correlation

0.38

1 player

M Ahmad

2 player

F Fourie

Weak Positive Correlation

0.3

1 player

M Ahmad

2 player

D Manuwelge

Weak Positive Correlation

0.33

1 player

M Ahmad

2 player

D Prophet

Weak Positive Correlation

0.54

1 player

M Ahmad

2 player

A Mather

Positive Correlation

0.27

1 player

M Ahmad

2 player

M Hunt

Weak Positive Correlation

0.6

1 player

M Ahmad

2 player

B Linde

Positive Correlation

0.53

1 player

M Ahmad

2 player

E Berger

Positive Correlation

0.07

1 player

M Ahmad

2 player

N Talbot

No Correlation

0.5

1 player

M Ahmad

2 player

P Dixon

Positive Correlation

1

1 player

M Ahmad

2 player

M Ahmad

Strong Positive Correlation

Strong Positive Correlation

No Correlation

Strong Negative Correlation

Pick **F Fourie** and **B Linde** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **F Fourie** and **E Berger** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **A Mather** and **M Hunt** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **M Hunt** and **N Talbot** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **B Linde** and **M Ahmad** together

Positive Correlation

Similar Perfomance

B Linde 0.73

E Berger 0.62

M Ahmad 0.38

D Manuwelge 0.34

A Mather 0.34

N Talbot 0.3

P Dixon 0.2

M Hunt 0.1

Opposite Perfomance

D Prophet -0.35

Similar Perfomance

F Fourie 0.73

M Ahmad 0.6

A Mather 0.59

N Talbot 0.48

D Manuwelge 0.36

M Hunt 0.35

E Berger 0.34

P Dixon 0.23

Opposite Perfomance

D Prophet -0.15

Similar Perfomance

F Fourie 0.62

D Manuwelge 0.59

M Ahmad 0.53

P Dixon 0.44

B Linde 0.34

A Mather 0.26

M Hunt 0.05

Opposite Perfomance

D Prophet -0.13

N Talbot -0.03

Similar Perfomance

E Berger 0.59

M Hunt 0.55

A Mather 0.52

B Linde 0.36

F Fourie 0.34

P Dixon 0.34

M Ahmad 0.3

N Talbot 0.05

Opposite Perfomance

D Prophet -0.35

Similar Perfomance

M Hunt 0.78

B Linde 0.59

M Ahmad 0.54

D Manuwelge 0.52

N Talbot 0.35

F Fourie 0.34

E Berger 0.26

P Dixon 0.13

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

OL Pike BOW WIM

J Palsar BOW WIM

Whipple AR WIM

J Weir BAT WIM

N Hucker WK WIM

A Slater BAT WIM

S Reeves AR WIM

B Sewell AR WIM

K Winder AR WIM

J Boyle BAT WIM

M Boyle BAT WIM

OL Pike

J Palsar

Whipple

J Weir

N Hucker

A Slater

S Reeves

B Sewell

K Winder

J Boyle

M Boyle

1

1 player

OL Pike

2 player

OL Pike

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.35

1 player

OL Pike

2 player

J Palsar

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.33

1 player

OL Pike

2 player

Whipple

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.67

1 player

OL Pike

2 player

J Weir

Negative Correlation

0.7

1 player

OL Pike

2 player

N Hucker

Positive Correlation

0

1 player

OL Pike

2 player

A Slater

No Correlation

0.7

1 player

OL Pike

2 player

S Reeves

Positive Correlation

0.7

1 player

OL Pike

2 player

B Sewell

Positive Correlation

-0.7

1 player

OL Pike

2 player

K Winder

Negative Correlation

-0.7

1 player

OL Pike

2 player

J Boyle

Negative Correlation

0

1 player

OL Pike

2 player

M Boyle

No Correlation

-0.35

1 player

J Palsar

2 player

OL Pike

Weak Negative Correlation

1

1 player

J Palsar

2 player

J Palsar

Strong Positive Correlation

0.35

1 player

J Palsar

2 player

Whipple

Weak Positive Correlation

0.7

1 player

J Palsar

2 player

J Weir

Positive Correlation

0

1 player

J Palsar

2 player

N Hucker

No Correlation

-0.7

1 player

J Palsar

2 player

A Slater

Negative Correlation

-0.7

1 player

J Palsar

2 player

S Reeves

Negative Correlation

0.7

1 player

J Palsar

2 player

B Sewell

Positive Correlation

0

1 player

J Palsar

2 player

K Winder

No Correlation

0

1 player

J Palsar

2 player

J Boyle

No Correlation

0.7

1 player

J Palsar

2 player

M Boyle

Positive Correlation

-0.33

1 player

Whipple

2 player

OL Pike

Weak Negative Correlation

0.35

1 player

Whipple

2 player

J Palsar

Weak Positive Correlation

1

1 player

Whipple

2 player

Whipple

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.07

1 player

Whipple

2 player

J Weir

No Correlation

0.43

1 player

Whipple

2 player

N Hucker

Positive Correlation

-0.56

1 player

Whipple

2 player

A Slater

Negative Correlation

0.25

1 player

Whipple

2 player

S Reeves

Weak Positive Correlation

0.5

1 player

Whipple

2 player

B Sewell

Positive Correlation

0

1 player

Whipple

2 player

K Winder

No Correlation

-0.11

1 player

Whipple

2 player

J Boyle

No Correlation

0.5

1 player

Whipple

2 player

M Boyle

Positive Correlation

-0.67

1 player

J Weir

2 player

OL Pike

Negative Correlation

0.7

1 player

J Weir

2 player

J Palsar

Positive Correlation

-0.07

1 player

J Weir

2 player

Whipple

No Correlation

1

1 player

J Weir

2 player

J Weir

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.71

1 player

J Weir

2 player

N Hucker

Negative Correlation

-0.11

1 player

J Weir

2 player

A Slater

No Correlation

-0.25

1 player

J Weir

2 player

S Reeves

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.5

1 player

J Weir

2 player

B Sewell

Negative Correlation

0

1 player

J Weir

2 player

K Winder

No Correlation

-0.11

1 player

J Weir

2 player

J Boyle

No Correlation

-0.25

1 player

J Weir

2 player

M Boyle

Weak Negative Correlation

0.7

1 player

N Hucker

2 player

OL Pike

Positive Correlation

0

1 player

N Hucker

2 player

J Palsar

No Correlation

0.43

1 player

N Hucker

2 player

Whipple

Positive Correlation

-0.71

1 player

N Hucker

2 player

J Weir

Negative Correlation

1

1 player

N Hucker

2 player

N Hucker

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.14

1 player

N Hucker

2 player

A Slater

No Correlation

0

1 player

N Hucker

2 player

S Reeves

No Correlation

0.67

1 player

N Hucker

2 player

B Sewell

Positive Correlation

-0.7

1 player

N Hucker

2 player

K Winder

Negative Correlation

-0.14

1 player

N Hucker

2 player

J Boyle

No Correlation

0.33

1 player

N Hucker

2 player

M Boyle

Weak Positive Correlation

0

1 player

A Slater

2 player

OL Pike

No Correlation

-0.7

1 player

A Slater

2 player

J Palsar

Negative Correlation

-0.56

1 player

A Slater

2 player

Whipple

Negative Correlation

-0.11

1 player

A Slater

2 player

J Weir

No Correlation

-0.14

1 player

A Slater

2 player

N Hucker

No Correlation

1

1 player

A Slater

2 player

A Slater

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.25

1 player

A Slater

2 player

S Reeves

Weak Negative Correlation

0

1 player

A Slater

2 player

B Sewell

No Correlation

0

1 player

A Slater

2 player

K Winder

No Correlation

-0.33

1 player

A Slater

2 player

J Boyle

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.25

1 player

A Slater

2 player

M Boyle

Weak Negative Correlation

0.7

1 player

S Reeves

2 player

OL Pike

Positive Correlation

-0.7

1 player

S Reeves

2 player

J Palsar

Negative Correlation

0.25

1 player

S Reeves

2 player

Whipple

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.25

1 player

S Reeves

2 player

J Weir

Weak Negative Correlation

0

1 player

S Reeves

2 player

N Hucker

No Correlation

-0.25

1 player

S Reeves

2 player

A Slater

Weak Negative Correlation

1

1 player

S Reeves

2 player

S Reeves

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.14

1 player

S Reeves

2 player

B Sewell

No Correlation

-0.7

1 player

S Reeves

2 player

K Winder

Negative Correlation

-0.25

1 player

S Reeves

2 player

J Boyle

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.14

1 player

S Reeves

2 player

M Boyle

No Correlation

0.7

1 player

B Sewell

2 player

OL Pike

Positive Correlation

0.7

1 player

B Sewell

2 player

J Palsar

Positive Correlation

0.5

1 player

B Sewell

2 player

Whipple

Positive Correlation

-0.5

1 player

B Sewell

2 player

J Weir

Negative Correlation

0.67

1 player

B Sewell

2 player

N Hucker

Positive Correlation

0

1 player

B Sewell

2 player

A Slater

No Correlation

-0.14

1 player

B Sewell

2 player

S Reeves

No Correlation

1

1 player

B Sewell

2 player

B Sewell

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.7

1 player

B Sewell

2 player

K Winder

Negative Correlation

-0.25

1 player

B Sewell

2 player

J Boyle

Weak Negative Correlation

1

1 player

B Sewell

2 player

M Boyle

Strong Positive Correlation

-0.7

1 player

K Winder

2 player

OL Pike

Negative Correlation

0

1 player

K Winder

2 player

J Palsar

No Correlation

0

1 player

K Winder

2 player

Whipple

No Correlation

0

1 player

K Winder

2 player

J Weir

No Correlation

-0.7

1 player

K Winder

2 player

N Hucker

Negative Correlation

0

1 player

K Winder

2 player

A Slater

No Correlation

-0.7

1 player

K Winder

2 player

S Reeves

Negative Correlation

-0.7

1 player

K Winder

2 player

B Sewell

Negative Correlation

1

1 player

K Winder

2 player

K Winder

Strong Positive Correlation

0.7

1 player

K Winder

2 player

J Boyle

Positive Correlation

0

1 player

K Winder

2 player

M Boyle

No Correlation

-0.7

1 player

J Boyle

2 player

OL Pike

Negative Correlation

0

1 player

J Boyle

2 player

J Palsar

No Correlation

-0.11

1 player

J Boyle

2 player

Whipple

No Correlation

-0.11

1 player

J Boyle

2 player

J Weir

No Correlation

-0.14

1 player

J Boyle

2 player

N Hucker

No Correlation

-0.33

1 player

J Boyle

2 player

A Slater

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.25

1 player

J Boyle

2 player

S Reeves

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.25

1 player

J Boyle

2 player

B Sewell

Weak Negative Correlation

0.7

1 player

J Boyle

2 player

K Winder

Positive Correlation

1

1 player

J Boyle

2 player

J Boyle

Strong Positive Correlation

0

1 player

J Boyle

2 player

M Boyle

No Correlation

0

1 player

M Boyle

2 player

OL Pike

No Correlation

0.7

1 player

M Boyle

2 player

J Palsar

Positive Correlation

0.5

1 player

M Boyle

2 player

Whipple

Positive Correlation

-0.25

1 player

M Boyle

2 player

J Weir

Weak Negative Correlation

0.33

1 player

M Boyle

2 player

N Hucker

Weak Positive Correlation

-0.25

1 player

M Boyle

2 player

A Slater

Weak Negative Correlation

-0.14

1 player

M Boyle

2 player

S Reeves

No Correlation

1

1 player

M Boyle

2 player

B Sewell

Strong Positive Correlation

0

1 player

M Boyle

2 player

K Winder

No Correlation

0

1 player

M Boyle

2 player

J Boyle

No Correlation

1

1 player

M Boyle

2 player

M Boyle

Strong Positive Correlation

Strong Positive Correlation

No Correlation

Strong Negative Correlation

Pick **OL Pike** and **S Reeves** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **J Palsar** and **J Weir** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **J Palsar** and **B Sewell** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **J Palsar** and **M Boyle** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **N Hucker** and **B Sewell** together

Positive Correlation

Pick **B Sewell** and **M Boyle** together

Strong Positive Correlation

Pick **OL Pike** and **J Weir** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **OL Pike** and **K Winder** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **OL Pike** and **J Boyle** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **J Palsar** and **S Reeves** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **J Weir** and **N Hucker** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **N Hucker** and **K Winder** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **S Reeves** and **K Winder** together

Negative Correlation

Pick **B Sewell** and **K Winder** together

Negative Correlation

Similar Perfomance

B Sewell 0.5

M Boyle 0.5

N Hucker 0.43

J Palsar 0.35

S Reeves 0.25

Opposite Perfomance

A Slater -0.56

OL Pike -0.33

J Boyle -0.11

J Weir -0.07

Similar Perfomance

J Palsar 0.7

Opposite Perfomance

N Hucker -0.71

OL Pike -0.67

B Sewell -0.5

S Reeves -0.25

M Boyle -0.25

A Slater -0.11

J Boyle -0.11

Whipple -0.07

Similar Perfomance

OL Pike 0.7

Whipple 0.25

Opposite Perfomance

J Palsar -0.7

K Winder -0.7

J Weir -0.25

A Slater -0.25

J Boyle -0.25

B Sewell -0.14

M Boyle -0.14

Similar Perfomance

B Sewell 1

J Palsar 0.7

Whipple 0.5

N Hucker 0.33

Opposite Perfomance

J Weir -0.25

A Slater -0.25

S Reeves -0.14

Similar Perfomance

M Boyle 1

OL Pike 0.7

J Palsar 0.7

N Hucker 0.67

Whipple 0.5

Opposite Perfomance

K Winder -0.7

J Weir -0.5

J Boyle -0.25

S Reeves -0.14

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

- Show result for
- Played Last Match
- Full Squad

No data found

No data found