Upcoming
Fixtures
View All
WS 22 May 11:00 pm CES

Lineup Out

The Cooper Associates County Ground, Taunton
Charlotte Edwards Cup

Best Player Combinations For
WS vs CES

How it Works?

This guide is super useful for identifying player combinations that are likely to score big. Use the filters to identify the best player combinations according to specific match scenarios.

Player correlate positively

Both players generally perform similarly when picked together. They either score high together or score low together. Maximise FPts by picking players that correlate positively with top players.

Player correlate negatively

Both players generally perform in an opposite manner. If one player scores high, the other usually scores low. Avoid picking players that correlate negatively with top player

More on PL Labs

WS vs CES

Show Player Combinations on the basis of:

Best WS Player Combinations

Best WS Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
F Wilson BAT WSS
A Wellington AR WSS
D Gibson AR WSS
S Luff BAT WSS
A Griffiths AR WSS
N Wraith WK WSS
E Corney BAT WSS
N Holland BAT WSS
M Robbins BOW WSS
C Skelton BOW WSS
S Smale AR WSS
F Wilson
A Wellington
D Gibson
S Luff
A Griffiths
N Wraith
E Corney
N Holland
M Robbins
C Skelton
S Smale
1
1 player
F Wilson
2 player
F Wilson
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.16
1 player
F Wilson
2 player
A Wellington
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
F Wilson
2 player
D Gibson
No Correlation
0.29
1 player
F Wilson
2 player
S Luff
Weak Positive Correlation
0.16
1 player
F Wilson
2 player
A Griffiths
No Correlation
0.36
1 player
F Wilson
2 player
N Wraith
Weak Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
F Wilson
2 player
E Corney
No Correlation
0.12
1 player
F Wilson
2 player
N Holland
No Correlation
0.6
1 player
F Wilson
2 player
M Robbins
Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
F Wilson
2 player
C Skelton
Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
F Wilson
2 player
S Smale
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.16
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
F Wilson
No Correlation
1
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
A Wellington
Strong Positive Correlation
0.57
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
D Gibson
Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
S Luff
No Correlation
0.3
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
A Griffiths
Weak Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
N Wraith
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
E Corney
Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
N Holland
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.47
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
M Robbins
Negative Correlation
0.09
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
C Skelton
No Correlation
0.48
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
S Smale
Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
D Gibson
2 player
F Wilson
No Correlation
0.57
1 player
D Gibson
2 player
A Wellington
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
D Gibson
2 player
D Gibson
Strong Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
D Gibson
2 player
S Luff
No Correlation
-0.03
1 player
D Gibson
2 player
A Griffiths
No Correlation
0.03
1 player
D Gibson
2 player
N Wraith
No Correlation
0.13
1 player
D Gibson
2 player
E Corney
No Correlation
-0.32
1 player
D Gibson
2 player
N Holland
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.4
1 player
D Gibson
2 player
M Robbins
Weak Negative Correlation
0.38
1 player
D Gibson
2 player
C Skelton
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.06
1 player
D Gibson
2 player
S Smale
No Correlation
0.29
1 player
S Luff
2 player
F Wilson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
S Luff
2 player
A Wellington
No Correlation
0.12
1 player
S Luff
2 player
D Gibson
No Correlation
1
1 player
S Luff
2 player
S Luff
Strong Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
S Luff
2 player
A Griffiths
No Correlation
0.21
1 player
S Luff
2 player
N Wraith
Weak Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
S Luff
2 player
E Corney
Weak Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
S Luff
2 player
N Holland
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
S Luff
2 player
M Robbins
Weak Positive Correlation
0.05
1 player
S Luff
2 player
C Skelton
No Correlation
0.37
1 player
S Luff
2 player
S Smale
Weak Positive Correlation
0.16
1 player
A Griffiths
2 player
F Wilson
No Correlation
0.3
1 player
A Griffiths
2 player
A Wellington
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.03
1 player
A Griffiths
2 player
D Gibson
No Correlation
0.07
1 player
A Griffiths
2 player
S Luff
No Correlation
1
1 player
A Griffiths
2 player
A Griffiths
Strong Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
A Griffiths
2 player
N Wraith
Weak Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
A Griffiths
2 player
E Corney
Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
A Griffiths
2 player
N Holland
Weak Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
A Griffiths
2 player
M Robbins
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
A Griffiths
2 player
C Skelton
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
A Griffiths
2 player
S Smale
Weak Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
N Wraith
2 player
F Wilson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
N Wraith
2 player
A Wellington
No Correlation
0.03
1 player
N Wraith
2 player
D Gibson
No Correlation
0.21
1 player
N Wraith
2 player
S Luff
Weak Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
N Wraith
2 player
A Griffiths
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
N Wraith
2 player
N Wraith
Strong Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
N Wraith
2 player
E Corney
Weak Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
N Wraith
2 player
N Holland
Weak Positive Correlation
0.45
1 player
N Wraith
2 player
M Robbins
Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
N Wraith
2 player
C Skelton
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
N Wraith
2 player
S Smale
Weak Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
E Corney
2 player
F Wilson
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
E Corney
2 player
A Wellington
Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
E Corney
2 player
D Gibson
No Correlation
0.34
1 player
E Corney
2 player
S Luff
Weak Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
E Corney
2 player
A Griffiths
Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
E Corney
2 player
N Wraith
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
E Corney
2 player
E Corney
Strong Positive Correlation
0.55
1 player
E Corney
2 player
N Holland
Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
E Corney
2 player
M Robbins
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
E Corney
2 player
C Skelton
No Correlation
0.37
1 player
E Corney
2 player
S Smale
Weak Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
N Holland
2 player
F Wilson
No Correlation
-0.25
1 player
N Holland
2 player
A Wellington
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.32
1 player
N Holland
2 player
D Gibson
Weak Negative Correlation
0.34
1 player
N Holland
2 player
S Luff
Weak Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
N Holland
2 player
A Griffiths
Weak Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
N Holland
2 player
N Wraith
Weak Positive Correlation
0.55
1 player
N Holland
2 player
E Corney
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
N Holland
2 player
N Holland
Strong Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
N Holland
2 player
M Robbins
Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
N Holland
2 player
C Skelton
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
N Holland
2 player
S Smale
Weak Positive Correlation
0.6
1 player
M Robbins
2 player
F Wilson
Positive Correlation
-0.47
1 player
M Robbins
2 player
A Wellington
Negative Correlation
-0.4
1 player
M Robbins
2 player
D Gibson
Weak Negative Correlation
0.2
1 player
M Robbins
2 player
S Luff
Weak Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
M Robbins
2 player
A Griffiths
No Correlation
0.45
1 player
M Robbins
2 player
N Wraith
Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
M Robbins
2 player
E Corney
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
M Robbins
2 player
N Holland
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M Robbins
2 player
M Robbins
Strong Positive Correlation
0.6
1 player
M Robbins
2 player
C Skelton
Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
M Robbins
2 player
S Smale
No Correlation
0.47
1 player
C Skelton
2 player
F Wilson
Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
C Skelton
2 player
A Wellington
No Correlation
0.38
1 player
C Skelton
2 player
D Gibson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.05
1 player
C Skelton
2 player
S Luff
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
C Skelton
2 player
A Griffiths
Weak Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
C Skelton
2 player
N Wraith
Weak Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
C Skelton
2 player
E Corney
No Correlation
0.22
1 player
C Skelton
2 player
N Holland
Weak Positive Correlation
0.6
1 player
C Skelton
2 player
M Robbins
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
C Skelton
2 player
C Skelton
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.01
1 player
C Skelton
2 player
S Smale
No Correlation
0.3
1 player
S Smale
2 player
F Wilson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.48
1 player
S Smale
2 player
A Wellington
Positive Correlation
-0.06
1 player
S Smale
2 player
D Gibson
No Correlation
0.37
1 player
S Smale
2 player
S Luff
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
S Smale
2 player
A Griffiths
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
S Smale
2 player
N Wraith
Weak Positive Correlation
0.37
1 player
S Smale
2 player
E Corney
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
S Smale
2 player
N Holland
Weak Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
S Smale
2 player
M Robbins
No Correlation
-0.01
1 player
S Smale
2 player
C Skelton
No Correlation
1
1 player
S Smale
2 player
S Smale
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick F Wilson and M Robbins together
Positive Correlation

Pick M Robbins and C Skelton together
Positive Correlation

High Performing Players

1 D Gibson

AR
Similar Perfomance
A Wellington 0.57
C Skelton 0.38
E Corney 0.13
S Luff 0.12
F Wilson 0.11
N Wraith 0.03
Opposite Perfomance
M Robbins -0.4
N Holland -0.32
S Smale -0.06
A Griffiths -0.03

2 S Luff

BAT
Similar Perfomance
S Smale 0.37
N Holland 0.34
E Corney 0.34
F Wilson 0.29
N Wraith 0.21
M Robbins 0.2
D Gibson 0.12
A Wellington 0.11
A Griffiths 0.07
C Skelton 0.05

3 S Smale

AR
Similar Perfomance
A Wellington 0.48
S Luff 0.37
E Corney 0.37
F Wilson 0.3
A Griffiths 0.25
N Holland 0.25
N Wraith 0.2
M Robbins 0.08
Opposite Perfomance
D Gibson -0.06
C Skelton -0.01

4 A Wellington

AR
Similar Perfomance
D Gibson 0.57
S Smale 0.48
E Corney 0.42
A Griffiths 0.3
S Luff 0.11
N Wraith 0.1
C Skelton 0.09
Opposite Perfomance
M Robbins -0.47
N Holland -0.25
F Wilson -0.16

5 F Wilson

BAT
Similar Perfomance
M Robbins 0.6
C Skelton 0.47
N Wraith 0.36
S Smale 0.3
S Luff 0.29
A Griffiths 0.16
E Corney 0.12
N Holland 0.12
D Gibson 0.11
Opposite Perfomance
A Wellington -0.16

Best CES Player Combinations

Best CES Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
C Webb BAT CES
K George AR CES
A Freeborn WK CES
E Jones BAT CES
A Campbell BAT CES
B Ellis AR CES
G Davis BOW CES
E Arlott AR CES
G Potts BOW CES
H Baker BOW CES
D Perrin BAT CES
C Webb
K George
A Freeborn
E Jones
A Campbell
B Ellis
G Davis
E Arlott
G Potts
H Baker
D Perrin
1
1 player
C Webb
2 player
C Webb
Strong Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
C Webb
2 player
K George
No Correlation
-0.1
1 player
C Webb
2 player
A Freeborn
No Correlation
0.39
1 player
C Webb
2 player
E Jones
Weak Positive Correlation
0.53
1 player
C Webb
2 player
A Campbell
Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
C Webb
2 player
B Ellis
No Correlation
0.05
1 player
C Webb
2 player
G Davis
No Correlation
0.01
1 player
C Webb
2 player
E Arlott
No Correlation
0.05
1 player
C Webb
2 player
G Potts
No Correlation
0.45
1 player
C Webb
2 player
H Baker
Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
C Webb
2 player
D Perrin
Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
K George
2 player
C Webb
No Correlation
1
1 player
K George
2 player
K George
Strong Positive Correlation
0.04
1 player
K George
2 player
A Freeborn
No Correlation
0.48
1 player
K George
2 player
E Jones
Positive Correlation
0.16
1 player
K George
2 player
A Campbell
No Correlation
0.22
1 player
K George
2 player
B Ellis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
K George
2 player
G Davis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
K George
2 player
E Arlott
Weak Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
K George
2 player
G Potts
No Correlation
0.19
1 player
K George
2 player
H Baker
No Correlation
0.21
1 player
K George
2 player
D Perrin
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.1
1 player
A Freeborn
2 player
C Webb
No Correlation
0.04
1 player
A Freeborn
2 player
K George
No Correlation
1
1 player
A Freeborn
2 player
A Freeborn
Strong Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
A Freeborn
2 player
E Jones
Weak Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
A Freeborn
2 player
A Campbell
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.18
1 player
A Freeborn
2 player
B Ellis
No Correlation
0.07
1 player
A Freeborn
2 player
G Davis
No Correlation
-0.03
1 player
A Freeborn
2 player
E Arlott
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
A Freeborn
2 player
G Potts
Weak Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
A Freeborn
2 player
H Baker
No Correlation
0.31
1 player
A Freeborn
2 player
D Perrin
Weak Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
E Jones
2 player
C Webb
Weak Positive Correlation
0.48
1 player
E Jones
2 player
K George
Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
E Jones
2 player
A Freeborn
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
E Jones
2 player
E Jones
Strong Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
E Jones
2 player
A Campbell
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.06
1 player
E Jones
2 player
B Ellis
No Correlation
0.45
1 player
E Jones
2 player
G Davis
Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
E Jones
2 player
E Arlott
Weak Positive Correlation
0.41
1 player
E Jones
2 player
G Potts
Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
E Jones
2 player
H Baker
Weak Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
E Jones
2 player
D Perrin
Weak Positive Correlation
0.53
1 player
A Campbell
2 player
C Webb
Positive Correlation
0.16
1 player
A Campbell
2 player
K George
No Correlation
0.38
1 player
A Campbell
2 player
A Freeborn
Weak Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
A Campbell
2 player
E Jones
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
A Campbell
2 player
A Campbell
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.08
1 player
A Campbell
2 player
B Ellis
No Correlation
0.18
1 player
A Campbell
2 player
G Davis
No Correlation
-0.06
1 player
A Campbell
2 player
E Arlott
No Correlation
0.06
1 player
A Campbell
2 player
G Potts
No Correlation
0.37
1 player
A Campbell
2 player
H Baker
Weak Positive Correlation
0.46
1 player
A Campbell
2 player
D Perrin
Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
B Ellis
2 player
C Webb
No Correlation
0.22
1 player
B Ellis
2 player
K George
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.18
1 player
B Ellis
2 player
A Freeborn
No Correlation
-0.06
1 player
B Ellis
2 player
E Jones
No Correlation
-0.08
1 player
B Ellis
2 player
A Campbell
No Correlation
1
1 player
B Ellis
2 player
B Ellis
Strong Positive Correlation
0.16
1 player
B Ellis
2 player
G Davis
No Correlation
0.52
1 player
B Ellis
2 player
E Arlott
Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
B Ellis
2 player
G Potts
Positive Correlation
-0.42
1 player
B Ellis
2 player
H Baker
Negative Correlation
-0.01
1 player
B Ellis
2 player
D Perrin
No Correlation
0.05
1 player
G Davis
2 player
C Webb
No Correlation
0.32
1 player
G Davis
2 player
K George
Weak Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
G Davis
2 player
A Freeborn
No Correlation
0.45
1 player
G Davis
2 player
E Jones
Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
G Davis
2 player
A Campbell
No Correlation
0.16
1 player
G Davis
2 player
B Ellis
No Correlation
1
1 player
G Davis
2 player
G Davis
Strong Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
G Davis
2 player
E Arlott
Weak Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
G Davis
2 player
G Potts
Weak Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
G Davis
2 player
H Baker
Weak Positive Correlation
0.06
1 player
G Davis
2 player
D Perrin
No Correlation
0.01
1 player
E Arlott
2 player
C Webb
No Correlation
0.24
1 player
E Arlott
2 player
K George
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.03
1 player
E Arlott
2 player
A Freeborn
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
E Arlott
2 player
E Jones
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.06
1 player
E Arlott
2 player
A Campbell
No Correlation
0.52
1 player
E Arlott
2 player
B Ellis
Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
E Arlott
2 player
G Davis
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
E Arlott
2 player
E Arlott
Strong Positive Correlation
0.05
1 player
E Arlott
2 player
G Potts
No Correlation
0.17
1 player
E Arlott
2 player
H Baker
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
E Arlott
2 player
D Perrin
No Correlation
0.05
1 player
G Potts
2 player
C Webb
No Correlation
0.17
1 player
G Potts
2 player
K George
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
G Potts
2 player
A Freeborn
Weak Positive Correlation
0.41
1 player
G Potts
2 player
E Jones
Positive Correlation
0.06
1 player
G Potts
2 player
A Campbell
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
G Potts
2 player
B Ellis
Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
G Potts
2 player
G Davis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.05
1 player
G Potts
2 player
E Arlott
No Correlation
1
1 player
G Potts
2 player
G Potts
Strong Positive Correlation
0.01
1 player
G Potts
2 player
H Baker
No Correlation
0.32
1 player
G Potts
2 player
D Perrin
Weak Positive Correlation
0.45
1 player
H Baker
2 player
C Webb
Positive Correlation
0.19
1 player
H Baker
2 player
K George
No Correlation
0.07
1 player
H Baker
2 player
A Freeborn
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
H Baker
2 player
E Jones
Weak Positive Correlation
0.37
1 player
H Baker
2 player
A Campbell
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.42
1 player
H Baker
2 player
B Ellis
Negative Correlation
0.24
1 player
H Baker
2 player
G Davis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
H Baker
2 player
E Arlott
No Correlation
0.01
1 player
H Baker
2 player
G Potts
No Correlation
1
1 player
H Baker
2 player
H Baker
Strong Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
H Baker
2 player
D Perrin
Weak Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
D Perrin
2 player
C Webb
Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
D Perrin
2 player
K George
Weak Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
D Perrin
2 player
A Freeborn
Weak Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
D Perrin
2 player
E Jones
Weak Positive Correlation
0.46
1 player
D Perrin
2 player
A Campbell
Positive Correlation
-0.01
1 player
D Perrin
2 player
B Ellis
No Correlation
0.06
1 player
D Perrin
2 player
G Davis
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
D Perrin
2 player
E Arlott
No Correlation
0.32
1 player
D Perrin
2 player
G Potts
Weak Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
D Perrin
2 player
H Baker
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
D Perrin
2 player
D Perrin
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

No data found

High Performing Players

1 E Arlott

AR
Similar Perfomance
B Ellis 0.52
E Jones 0.33
G Davis 0.32
K George 0.24
H Baker 0.17
G Potts 0.05
C Webb 0.01
Opposite Perfomance
D Perrin -0.14
A Campbell -0.06
A Freeborn -0.03

2 E Jones

BAT
Similar Perfomance
K George 0.48
G Davis 0.45
G Potts 0.41
C Webb 0.39
A Campbell 0.36
E Arlott 0.33
A Freeborn 0.25
D Perrin 0.24
H Baker 0.23
Opposite Perfomance
B Ellis -0.06

3 G Potts

BOW
Similar Perfomance
B Ellis 0.42
E Jones 0.41
G Davis 0.36
D Perrin 0.32
A Freeborn 0.23
K George 0.17
A Campbell 0.06
C Webb 0.05
E Arlott 0.05
H Baker 0.01

4 A Freeborn

WK
Similar Perfomance
A Campbell 0.38
D Perrin 0.31
E Jones 0.25
G Potts 0.23
G Davis 0.07
H Baker 0.07
K George 0.04
Opposite Perfomance
B Ellis -0.18
C Webb -0.1
E Arlott -0.03

5 K George

AR
Similar Perfomance
E Jones 0.48
G Davis 0.32
E Arlott 0.24
B Ellis 0.22
D Perrin 0.21
H Baker 0.19
C Webb 0.17
G Potts 0.17
A Campbell 0.16
A Freeborn 0.04

Best WS Player Combinations

Best WS Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
F Wilson BAT WSS
A Wellington AR WSS
D Gibson AR WSS
S Luff BAT WSS
A Griffiths AR WSS
N Wraith WK WSS
E Corney BAT WSS
N Holland BAT WSS
M Robbins BOW WSS
C Skelton BOW WSS
S Smale AR WSS
F Wilson
A Wellington
D Gibson
S Luff
A Griffiths
N Wraith
E Corney
N Holland
M Robbins
C Skelton
S Smale
1
1 player
F Wilson
2 player
F Wilson
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.43
1 player
F Wilson
2 player
A Wellington
Negative Correlation
-0.07
1 player
F Wilson
2 player
D Gibson
No Correlation
0.1
1 player
F Wilson
2 player
S Luff
No Correlation
0.06
1 player
F Wilson
2 player
A Griffiths
No Correlation
0
1 player
F Wilson
2 player
N Wraith
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
F Wilson
2 player
E Corney
Weak Negative Correlation
0.23
1 player
F Wilson
2 player
N Holland
Weak Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
F Wilson
2 player
M Robbins
Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
F Wilson
2 player
C Skelton
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
F Wilson
2 player
S Smale
No Correlation
-0.43
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
F Wilson
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
A Wellington
Strong Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
D Gibson
Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
S Luff
Weak Negative Correlation
0.42
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
A Griffiths
Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
N Wraith
Positive Correlation
0.67
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
E Corney
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
N Holland
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
M Robbins
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
C Skelton
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
S Smale
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.07
1 player
D Gibson
2 player
F Wilson
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
D Gibson
2 player
A Wellington
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
D Gibson
2 player
D Gibson
Strong Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
D Gibson
2 player
S Luff
No Correlation
-0.11
1 player
D Gibson
2 player
A Griffiths
No Correlation
0
1 player
D Gibson
2 player
N Wraith
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
D Gibson
2 player
E Corney
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.6
1 player
D Gibson
2 player
N Holland
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
D Gibson
2 player
M Robbins
Negative Correlation
0.25
1 player
D Gibson
2 player
C Skelton
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
D Gibson
2 player
S Smale
Weak Negative Correlation
0.1
1 player
S Luff
2 player
F Wilson
No Correlation
-0.25
1 player
S Luff
2 player
A Wellington
Weak Negative Correlation
0.1
1 player
S Luff
2 player
D Gibson
No Correlation
1
1 player
S Luff
2 player
S Luff
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.57
1 player
S Luff
2 player
A Griffiths
Negative Correlation
-0.15
1 player
S Luff
2 player
N Wraith
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
S Luff
2 player
E Corney
No Correlation
0
1 player
S Luff
2 player
N Holland
No Correlation
0
1 player
S Luff
2 player
M Robbins
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
S Luff
2 player
C Skelton
No Correlation
-0.05
1 player
S Luff
2 player
S Smale
No Correlation
0.06
1 player
A Griffiths
2 player
F Wilson
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
A Griffiths
2 player
A Wellington
Positive Correlation
-0.11
1 player
A Griffiths
2 player
D Gibson
No Correlation
-0.57
1 player
A Griffiths
2 player
S Luff
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
A Griffiths
2 player
A Griffiths
Strong Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
A Griffiths
2 player
N Wraith
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
A Griffiths
2 player
E Corney
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
A Griffiths
2 player
N Holland
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Griffiths
2 player
M Robbins
No Correlation
-0.09
1 player
A Griffiths
2 player
C Skelton
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
A Griffiths
2 player
S Smale
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
N Wraith
2 player
F Wilson
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
N Wraith
2 player
A Wellington
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
N Wraith
2 player
D Gibson
No Correlation
-0.15
1 player
N Wraith
2 player
S Luff
No Correlation
0.13
1 player
N Wraith
2 player
A Griffiths
No Correlation
1
1 player
N Wraith
2 player
N Wraith
Strong Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
N Wraith
2 player
E Corney
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
N Wraith
2 player
N Holland
No Correlation
0
1 player
N Wraith
2 player
M Robbins
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
N Wraith
2 player
C Skelton
No Correlation
-0.26
1 player
N Wraith
2 player
S Smale
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
E Corney
2 player
F Wilson
Weak Negative Correlation
0.67
1 player
E Corney
2 player
A Wellington
Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
E Corney
2 player
D Gibson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
E Corney
2 player
S Luff
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
E Corney
2 player
A Griffiths
No Correlation
0.43
1 player
E Corney
2 player
N Wraith
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
E Corney
2 player
E Corney
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
E Corney
2 player
N Holland
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.35
1 player
E Corney
2 player
M Robbins
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.43
1 player
E Corney
2 player
C Skelton
Negative Correlation
0.43
1 player
E Corney
2 player
S Smale
Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
N Holland
2 player
F Wilson
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
N Holland
2 player
A Wellington
Negative Correlation
-0.6
1 player
N Holland
2 player
D Gibson
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
N Holland
2 player
S Luff
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
N Holland
2 player
A Griffiths
No Correlation
0
1 player
N Holland
2 player
N Wraith
No Correlation
-0.35
1 player
N Holland
2 player
E Corney
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
N Holland
2 player
N Holland
Strong Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
N Holland
2 player
M Robbins
Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
N Holland
2 player
C Skelton
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.38
1 player
N Holland
2 player
S Smale
Weak Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Robbins
2 player
F Wilson
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
M Robbins
2 player
A Wellington
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
M Robbins
2 player
D Gibson
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
M Robbins
2 player
S Luff
No Correlation
0
1 player
M Robbins
2 player
A Griffiths
No Correlation
0
1 player
M Robbins
2 player
N Wraith
No Correlation
-0.35
1 player
M Robbins
2 player
E Corney
Weak Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Robbins
2 player
N Holland
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M Robbins
2 player
M Robbins
Strong Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
M Robbins
2 player
C Skelton
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
M Robbins
2 player
S Smale
Weak Negative Correlation
0.38
1 player
C Skelton
2 player
F Wilson
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
C Skelton
2 player
A Wellington
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
C Skelton
2 player
D Gibson
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
C Skelton
2 player
S Luff
No Correlation
-0.09
1 player
C Skelton
2 player
A Griffiths
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
C Skelton
2 player
N Wraith
No Correlation
-0.43
1 player
C Skelton
2 player
E Corney
Negative Correlation
0.2
1 player
C Skelton
2 player
N Holland
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
C Skelton
2 player
M Robbins
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
C Skelton
2 player
C Skelton
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.54
1 player
C Skelton
2 player
S Smale
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
S Smale
2 player
F Wilson
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
S Smale
2 player
A Wellington
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
S Smale
2 player
D Gibson
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.05
1 player
S Smale
2 player
S Luff
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
S Smale
2 player
A Griffiths
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.26
1 player
S Smale
2 player
N Wraith
Weak Negative Correlation
0.43
1 player
S Smale
2 player
E Corney
Positive Correlation
-0.38
1 player
S Smale
2 player
N Holland
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.35
1 player
S Smale
2 player
M Robbins
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.54
1 player
S Smale
2 player
C Skelton
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
S Smale
2 player
S Smale
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick A Wellington and D Gibson together
Positive Correlation

Pick A Wellington and E Corney together
Positive Correlation

Pick N Holland and M Robbins together
Positive Correlation

Pick A Wellington and N Holland together
Negative Correlation

Pick A Wellington and M Robbins together
Negative Correlation

Pick D Gibson and N Holland together
Negative Correlation

Pick D Gibson and M Robbins together
Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 D Gibson

AR
Similar Perfomance
A Wellington 0.7
C Skelton 0.25
E Corney 0.23
S Luff 0.1
Opposite Perfomance
M Robbins -0.7
N Holland -0.6
S Smale -0.23
A Griffiths -0.11
F Wilson -0.07

2 S Luff

BAT
Similar Perfomance
E Corney 0.14
F Wilson 0.1
D Gibson 0.1
Opposite Perfomance
A Griffiths -0.57
A Wellington -0.25
N Wraith -0.15
C Skelton -0.14
S Smale -0.05

3 S Smale

AR
Similar Perfomance
E Corney 0.43
A Wellington 0.25
A Griffiths 0.25
Opposite Perfomance
C Skelton -0.54
N Holland -0.38
M Robbins -0.35
N Wraith -0.26
D Gibson -0.23
S Luff -0.05

4 N Wraith

WK
Similar Perfomance
A Wellington 0.5
E Corney 0.43
C Skelton 0.14
A Griffiths 0.13
Opposite Perfomance
S Smale -0.26
S Luff -0.15

5 A Griffiths

AR
Similar Perfomance
A Wellington 0.42
S Smale 0.25
N Wraith 0.13
N Holland 0.08
F Wilson 0.06
Opposite Perfomance
S Luff -0.57
E Corney -0.14
D Gibson -0.11
C Skelton -0.09

Best CES Player Combinations

Best CES Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
C Webb BAT CES
K George AR CES
A Freeborn WK CES
E Jones BAT CES
A Campbell BAT CES
B Ellis AR CES
G Davis BOW CES
E Arlott AR CES
G Potts BOW CES
H Baker BOW CES
D Perrin BAT CES
C Webb
K George
A Freeborn
E Jones
A Campbell
B Ellis
G Davis
E Arlott
G Potts
H Baker
D Perrin
1
1 player
C Webb
2 player
C Webb
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.45
1 player
C Webb
2 player
K George
Negative Correlation
-0.27
1 player
C Webb
2 player
A Freeborn
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
C Webb
2 player
E Jones
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
C Webb
2 player
A Campbell
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
C Webb
2 player
B Ellis
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.64
1 player
C Webb
2 player
G Davis
Negative Correlation
-0.2
1 player
C Webb
2 player
E Arlott
No Correlation
-0.09
1 player
C Webb
2 player
G Potts
No Correlation
0
1 player
C Webb
2 player
H Baker
No Correlation
0.45
1 player
C Webb
2 player
D Perrin
Positive Correlation
-0.45
1 player
K George
2 player
C Webb
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
K George
2 player
K George
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.37
1 player
K George
2 player
A Freeborn
Weak Negative Correlation
0.25
1 player
K George
2 player
E Jones
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.43
1 player
K George
2 player
A Campbell
Negative Correlation
0.25
1 player
K George
2 player
B Ellis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
K George
2 player
G Davis
No Correlation
0.29
1 player
K George
2 player
E Arlott
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
K George
2 player
G Potts
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.12
1 player
K George
2 player
H Baker
No Correlation
-0.41
1 player
K George
2 player
D Perrin
Negative Correlation
-0.27
1 player
A Freeborn
2 player
C Webb
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.37
1 player
A Freeborn
2 player
K George
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
A Freeborn
2 player
A Freeborn
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.2
1 player
A Freeborn
2 player
E Jones
No Correlation
0.05
1 player
A Freeborn
2 player
A Campbell
No Correlation
-0.56
1 player
A Freeborn
2 player
B Ellis
Negative Correlation
0.16
1 player
A Freeborn
2 player
G Davis
No Correlation
-0.22
1 player
A Freeborn
2 player
E Arlott
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.24
1 player
A Freeborn
2 player
G Potts
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
A Freeborn
2 player
H Baker
No Correlation
0.18
1 player
A Freeborn
2 player
D Perrin
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
E Jones
2 player
C Webb
Weak Negative Correlation
0.25
1 player
E Jones
2 player
K George
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.2
1 player
E Jones
2 player
A Freeborn
No Correlation
1
1 player
E Jones
2 player
E Jones
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.11
1 player
E Jones
2 player
A Campbell
No Correlation
-0.43
1 player
E Jones
2 player
B Ellis
Negative Correlation
0.62
1 player
E Jones
2 player
G Davis
Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
E Jones
2 player
E Arlott
Weak Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
E Jones
2 player
G Potts
Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
E Jones
2 player
H Baker
No Correlation
-0.43
1 player
E Jones
2 player
D Perrin
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
A Campbell
2 player
C Webb
No Correlation
-0.43
1 player
A Campbell
2 player
K George
Negative Correlation
0.05
1 player
A Campbell
2 player
A Freeborn
No Correlation
-0.11
1 player
A Campbell
2 player
E Jones
No Correlation
1
1 player
A Campbell
2 player
A Campbell
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.11
1 player
A Campbell
2 player
B Ellis
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
A Campbell
2 player
G Davis
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.5
1 player
A Campbell
2 player
E Arlott
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
A Campbell
2 player
G Potts
No Correlation
0.06
1 player
A Campbell
2 player
H Baker
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Campbell
2 player
D Perrin
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
B Ellis
2 player
C Webb
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
B Ellis
2 player
K George
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.56
1 player
B Ellis
2 player
A Freeborn
Negative Correlation
-0.43
1 player
B Ellis
2 player
E Jones
Negative Correlation
-0.11
1 player
B Ellis
2 player
A Campbell
No Correlation
1
1 player
B Ellis
2 player
B Ellis
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
B Ellis
2 player
G Davis
Weak Negative Correlation
0.35
1 player
B Ellis
2 player
E Arlott
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
B Ellis
2 player
G Potts
No Correlation
-0.71
1 player
B Ellis
2 player
H Baker
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
B Ellis
2 player
D Perrin
No Correlation
-0.64
1 player
G Davis
2 player
C Webb
Negative Correlation
0.18
1 player
G Davis
2 player
K George
No Correlation
0.16
1 player
G Davis
2 player
A Freeborn
No Correlation
0.62
1 player
G Davis
2 player
E Jones
Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
G Davis
2 player
A Campbell
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
G Davis
2 player
B Ellis
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
G Davis
2 player
G Davis
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
G Davis
2 player
E Arlott
No Correlation
0.29
1 player
G Davis
2 player
G Potts
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
G Davis
2 player
H Baker
No Correlation
-0.29
1 player
G Davis
2 player
D Perrin
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.2
1 player
E Arlott
2 player
C Webb
No Correlation
0.29
1 player
E Arlott
2 player
K George
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.22
1 player
E Arlott
2 player
A Freeborn
Weak Negative Correlation
0.3
1 player
E Arlott
2 player
E Jones
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.5
1 player
E Arlott
2 player
A Campbell
Negative Correlation
0.35
1 player
E Arlott
2 player
B Ellis
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
E Arlott
2 player
G Davis
No Correlation
1
1 player
E Arlott
2 player
E Arlott
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
E Arlott
2 player
G Potts
No Correlation
0
1 player
E Arlott
2 player
H Baker
No Correlation
-0.5
1 player
E Arlott
2 player
D Perrin
Negative Correlation
-0.09
1 player
G Potts
2 player
C Webb
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
G Potts
2 player
K George
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.24
1 player
G Potts
2 player
A Freeborn
Weak Negative Correlation
0.4
1 player
G Potts
2 player
E Jones
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
G Potts
2 player
A Campbell
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
G Potts
2 player
B Ellis
No Correlation
0.29
1 player
G Potts
2 player
G Davis
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
G Potts
2 player
E Arlott
No Correlation
1
1 player
G Potts
2 player
G Potts
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.29
1 player
G Potts
2 player
H Baker
Weak Negative Correlation
0.08
1 player
G Potts
2 player
D Perrin
No Correlation
0
1 player
H Baker
2 player
C Webb
No Correlation
-0.12
1 player
H Baker
2 player
K George
No Correlation
0
1 player
H Baker
2 player
A Freeborn
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
H Baker
2 player
E Jones
No Correlation
0.06
1 player
H Baker
2 player
A Campbell
No Correlation
-0.71
1 player
H Baker
2 player
B Ellis
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
H Baker
2 player
G Davis
No Correlation
0
1 player
H Baker
2 player
E Arlott
No Correlation
-0.29
1 player
H Baker
2 player
G Potts
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
H Baker
2 player
H Baker
Strong Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
H Baker
2 player
D Perrin
No Correlation
0.45
1 player
D Perrin
2 player
C Webb
Positive Correlation
-0.41
1 player
D Perrin
2 player
K George
Negative Correlation
0.18
1 player
D Perrin
2 player
A Freeborn
No Correlation
-0.43
1 player
D Perrin
2 player
E Jones
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
D Perrin
2 player
A Campbell
No Correlation
0
1 player
D Perrin
2 player
B Ellis
No Correlation
-0.29
1 player
D Perrin
2 player
G Davis
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.5
1 player
D Perrin
2 player
E Arlott
Negative Correlation
0.08
1 player
D Perrin
2 player
G Potts
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
D Perrin
2 player
H Baker
No Correlation
1
1 player
D Perrin
2 player
D Perrin
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick E Jones and G Davis together
Positive Correlation

Pick C Webb and G Davis together
Negative Correlation

Pick B Ellis and H Baker together
Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 E Arlott

AR
Similar Perfomance
B Ellis 0.35
E Jones 0.3
K George 0.29
Opposite Perfomance
A Campbell -0.5
D Perrin -0.5
A Freeborn -0.22
C Webb -0.2
G Davis -0.14
G Potts -0.14

2 E Jones

BAT
Similar Perfomance
G Davis 0.62
G Potts 0.4
E Arlott 0.3
K George 0.25
H Baker 0.14
Opposite Perfomance
B Ellis -0.43
D Perrin -0.43
C Webb -0.33
A Freeborn -0.2
A Campbell -0.11

3 A Freeborn

WK
Similar Perfomance
D Perrin 0.18
G Davis 0.16
A Campbell 0.05
Opposite Perfomance
B Ellis -0.56
K George -0.37
C Webb -0.27
G Potts -0.24
E Arlott -0.22
E Jones -0.2

4 K George

AR
Similar Perfomance
E Arlott 0.29
E Jones 0.25
B Ellis 0.25
G Potts 0.2
G Davis 0.18
Opposite Perfomance
C Webb -0.45
A Campbell -0.43
D Perrin -0.41
A Freeborn -0.37
H Baker -0.12

5 H Baker

BOW
Similar Perfomance
E Jones 0.14
D Perrin 0.14
A Campbell 0.06
Opposite Perfomance
B Ellis -0.71
G Potts -0.29
K George -0.12

More on PL Labs

WS vs CES

PerfectLineup © 2025. All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer - PerfectLineup is an educational tool providing detailed analysis of sports players based on their past performances. We are not associated with any gaming activity and do not host any kind of paid or free contests or pool games. Our focus is purely on data-driven solutions to enhance our users' knowledge.

Perfect Lineup is not affiliated in any way to and claims no association, in any capacity whatsoever, with the Residents of the states of SIKKIM, ASSAM, ODISHA, TELANGANA, NAGALAND, ANDHRA PRADESH and where otherwise prohibited by law are not eligible to access Perfect Lineup.

This platform is applicable for users 18+ Only